The Times is unabashedly PRO AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS, PATHWAY TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE FOR MEXICANS, AND NO E-VERIFY publisher.
You won’t read about the staggering crime rates that come with the MEXICAN INVASION and OCCUPATION. Nothing on gang murders, ID theft, car theft, shop lifting to the scale of operations pulling in millions from theft.
You won’t read in the Times anything on the Mexican’s contempt for our language, culture, or flag. The inherent Mexican racism is never discussed while Mexicans call every American that thinks the Mexicans should obey our laws, or speak English “RACIST”.
The reason we don’t read about the Mexican occupation from the NEW YORK TIMES is because that struggling paper is 10% owned by CARLOS SLIM, the Mexican billionaire.
While Mexico has more billionaires than Saudi Arabia or Switzerland, you won’t hear in this country or Mexico, any notions that the Mexican oligarchy should do something to help its people other than dumping 38 million of them over our border. 38 million of their poor, illiterate, criminal and frequently pregnant to depress wages $200 - $300 BILLION PER YEAR. No wonder the FORTUNE 500 are generous LA RAZA DONORS!
EVERY YEAR 1.5 MILLION ILLEGALS CROSS OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS.
EVERY YEAR 1.5 MILLION AMERICAN FALL INTO POVERTY.
EVERY DAY THERE ARE 12 AMERICANS MURDERED BY ILLEGALS FROM MEXICO.
EVERY DAY THERE ARE 8 CHILDREN MOLESTED BY ILLEGALS FROM MEXICO.
THE REASON THE WALL ISN’T BUILT ISN’T JUST BECAUSE WE’RE NOT FIGHTING THE TERRORIST ON OUR MEXICAN BORDER, WHO MURDER, RAPE, KIDNAP AND LOP OFF HEADS, AND NOT BECAUSE WE’RE SQUANDERING BILLIONS DEFENDING THE BIG BUSH SAUDIS OVER THERE AGAINST SADDAM, IT’S BECAUSE THE SPECIAL INTERESTS DON’T WANT IT BUILT!
OBAMA IS DETERMINED TO BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES WITH AMNESTY.
NANCY PELOSI HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY. SHE VOWS THE WALL WILL NEVER BE BUILT.
NEW YORK TIMES
September 22, 2009
EDITORIAL
Border Fantasies
Members of Congress who voted for the Southwest border fence as the fix for illegal immigration professed shock — shock at the news that the project is running years behind, and billions of dollars ahead, of the Bush administration’s early, rosy projections.
Auditors reported last week that the high-tech, 28-mile “virtual” section of the fence was running a mere seven years behind this month’s planned opening. Initially, designers talked of using off-the-shelf technology for the radar, cameras and other sensors, but problems cropped up. (Imagine, discovering that cameras tremble in rough weather.) “I’m trying to figure out why this is so difficult,” said Representative Michael McCaul of Texas. “These are basically cameras on a pole.”
The current cost estimate for the Buck Rogers barrier? $1.1 billion.
Investigators from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office report that the larger, actual fence — covering a 600 mile-plus stretch between San Diego and Brownsville, Tex. — cost $2.4 billion to build and will cost an extra $6.5 billion in upkeep across two decades.
Investigators also concluded that there’s no good way of gauging the effectiveness of the fence.
The current decline in border arrests could be because of the bad economy as much as the fence (which the innovative have already learned to breach with cutters, torches and ladders). Even then, the fence covers only the more manageable third of the border with Mexico.
Members of the House border security subcommittee voiced grave concern but didn’t peer much beyond fencing technology to the more complex reality: the need for Congress to reform the nation’s immigration laws. No fence can keep a determined immigrant out or absolve Congress of that responsibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment