Saturday, March 6, 2010

ATTRITION WORKS! Painless, Cheap, Non-Violent, Quick - BUT LA RAZA DEMS SAY HELL NO! WE NEED ILLEGALS' VOTES!

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*
What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday August 18, 2008

The largest business lobby in the country is again meddling in Immigration policy. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has issued a scathing report on requiring federal contractors to use E-Verify, the federal program designed to check the legal status of all workers. President Bush signed an executive order
requiring federal contractors to use the system, but the open-borders Chamber of Commerce calls the initiative, "misguided, premature, and unwarranted.”
*
ATTRITION WORKS! PUT THE EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS IN JAIL! WATCH THEM OVERNIGHT STOP HIRING ILLEGALS WITH STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. WATCH THE ILLEGALS HEAD HOME AND DEMAND THEIR OWN COUNTRY, INSTEAD OF OURS, HAND THEM JOBS, WELFARE AND FREE MEDICAL!
THE RESIDUAL OF THIS IS EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGAL WOULD HAVE TO PAY LIVING WAGES! LIVING WAGES FOR AMERICAN MEANS HIGHER TAXES. THE END OF THE MEXICAN WELFARE AND PRISON STATE, WOULD MEAN LESS DEFICITS, MELTDOWNS, AND BILLIONS SAVED THAT ARE WASTED PAYING FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE AND PRISONS STATE!
THE IMPEDIMENT TO GETTING OUR COUNTRY BACK ARE THE CORPORATE OWNED LA RAZA DEMS. OBAMA WANTS POCKETS FULL OF BANKSTER MONEY AND THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS. NANCY PELOSI HAS LONG ILLEGALLY HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY. DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL. BOTH FIGHT TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY!
*

ASK YOURSELF WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE MAJOR DONORS TO LA RAZA, THE MEXICAN SUPREMACIST FASCIST PARTY?
*
Small Business Owners: 79 percent said inadequate enforcement ( 17% unemployment)
________________________________________
Date: 2010-02-05, 11:11AM PST
Reply to: comm-hfte5-1587500470@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]
________________________________________

New Poll Reveals Business Leaders and Union Members Favor Enforcement over Amnesty
Wednesday, - posted on NumbersUSA


A new Zogby poll (see the full report from the Center for Immigration Studies) reveals that when given the choice between enforcing immigration laws causing illegal aliens to leave the country or offering a mass amnesty, senior business executives, small business owners and union members favor enforcement. This is in stark contrast to the business and union lobbyists who are pushing for an amnesty.

Among the findings...

When asked to choose between enforcement that would cause illegal immigrants in the country to go home or offering them a pathway to citizenship with conditions, most members of the business community and unions choose enforcement.

Executives (e.g. CEOs, CFOs, VPs etc.): 59 percent support enforcement to encourage illegals to go home; 30 percent support conditional legalization.
Small Business Owners: 67 percent support enforcement; 22 percent support conditional legalization.
Union Households: 58 percent support enforcement; 28 percent support conditional legalization.
One of the most interesting findings of the survey is that members of the business community think there are plenty of Americans available to fill unskilled jobs. Union members feel the same way.

Executives: 16 percent said legal immigration should be increased to fill unskilled jobs, 61 percent said there are plenty of Americans available to do unskilled jobs, employers just need to pay more.
Small Business Owners: 13 percent said increase immigration; 65 percent said plenty of Americans are available.
Union Households: 10 percent said increase immigration; 72 percent said plenty of Americans are available.
Most members of the business community and union households do not feel that illegal immigration is caused by limits on legal immigration, as many of their lobbyists argue; instead, members feel it is due to a lack of enforcement.

Executives: Just 13 percent said illegal immigration is caused by not letting in enough legal immigrants; 75 percent said inadequate enforcement.
Small Business Owners: 10 percent said not enough legal immigration; 79 percent said inadequate enforcement.
Union Households: 13 percent said not enough legal immigration; 74 percent said inadequate enforcement efforts.
In contrast to many businesses group and union leaders, most executives and union members think im- migration is too high.

Executives: 63 percent said it is too high; 5 percent said too low; 16 percent said just right.
Small Business Owners: 70 percent said it is too high; 4 percent said too low; 13 percent said just right.
Union Households: 63 percent said immigration is too high; 5 percent said too low; 14 percent said just right.
The key question in the poll asked whether business leaders and union members would choose enforcement versus amnesty, and the overwhelming majority choose enforcement.


*
What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

By David R. Francis
from the June 23, 2008 edition
What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.
Amazingly, that is happening now – to some degree. This trend may already be shrinking the flood across the Mexican border and have a modest positive impact on job prospects for "native born" Americans during the present economic slump.
Immigration prosecutions reached an all-time high in March, reports the Trans_actional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), a data research and distribution group at Syracuse University in New York. Using data from the Justice Department, it calculates that prosecutions were up 49 percent from February and 72.7 percent from March of last year. This highly unusual surge is filling up US detention centers and jails.
March prosecutions numbered 9,360. That's small compared to the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants in the US. Nonetheless, "It's working," says Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington think tank that would like immigration levels reduced considerably.
The hike in prosecutions stems from an expansion of "Operation Streamline" last year by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Under the effort, undocumented aliens caught by border guards are no longer simply steered into "air-conditioned buses," as Mr. Krikorian puts it, and driven back across the border to try crossing again. Instead, they are charged with crimes and detained.
The most common charge is "reentry of a deported alien." But there are at least nine other crimes, including entry of an alien at an improper time or place. The result is detention until trial, usually before US Magistrate Courts. A typical sentence is one month, and then "removal."
That time under detention, DHS hopes, will deter these aliens from trying again and discourage others from even trying. Border crossings have plunged, especially in areas where those caught are put into lockups. Border patrol apprehensions along the Mexican border were down 17 percent to 347,372 between October 2007 and March 2008, compared with the same period a year previous.


BECOME A BLOG FOLLOWER:
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
In addition to the border measures, immigration officials have stepped up well-publicized raids on meatpacking firms and other companies hiring undocumented workers. States, including Arizona, also have been cracking down on employers of illegal immigrants, a crime often harder to prove in court than illegal border crossing.
Krikorian guesses that in the past, 800,000 to 900,000 illegal immigrants successfully entered the US every year, and about 400,000 left voluntarily or were deported each year – a net growth of about 500,000 illegal immigrants a year.
If current moves to restrain illegal immigration trim that growth by 100,000 to 200,000 immigrants, it should have some effect on the nation's labor supply, notes University of Chicago economist Jeffrey Grogger. He's coauthor of a paper calculating that a 10 percent increase in the supply of a particular skill group caused by higher immigration prompted a reduction in the wages of similarly low-skilled black men by 4 percent between 1960 and 2000, lowered their employment rate by a huge 3.5 percentage points, and increased their incarceration rate by almost a full percentage point.
So, presumably, fewer low-skilled immigrants could gradually induce more work for low-skilled native Americans.
The weaker economy and labor market should also prove less of a draw for immigrants, mostly undocumented ones, over the next year or two, cutting the flow by "several hundred thousand" per year, reckons a new study by four economists with Goldman Sachs, a prominent Wall Street investment bank. That would reduce labor-force growth by 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points compared with the growth rate in the past few years – and thus the potential for greater economic growth. The Goldman Sachs economists would welcome an increase in the flow of immigrants as a way to absorb the excess inventory of homes troubling the housing industry, and mitigate the "incipient pressures on the federal budget due to the impending retirement of the baby boom generation."
But a study by Northeastern University's Center for Labor Market Studies in Boston attributes the "unprecedented" levels of legal, illegal, and temporary immigration as a factor underlying the "devastation" in the job scene for America's teens and young adults over the past seven years. That's especially the case for males with no schooling beyond high school and youths from low-income families. Summer seasonal jobs as a proportion of all jobs are at the lowest level now in the past 30 years.
………………
NOTE THE DATE OF THE BELOW CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR article

(HILLARY CLINTON WAS BOUGHT BY WALMART. AS A FORMER “BOARD MEMBER” CLINTON HAS NEVER AND WILL NEVER SPEAK OUT ABOUT THE EXPLOITATION BY AMERICAN’S LARGEST EMPLOYER…. FIVE OWNERS, THE WALTONS, HAVE ASSETS OF $20 !BILLIION! YES, BILLION EACH, YES, EACH)

from the March 28, 2005 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0328/p08s01-comv.html j
Joke on America: Hiring Illegals
The Monitor's View
Ha ha ha. That's a good one. Wal-Mart, a company with $285 billion in sales, gets fined a mere $11 million earlier this month for having hundreds of illegal immigrants clean its stores.
The federal government boasts it's the largest fine of its kind. But for Wal-Mart, it amounts to a rounding error - and no admittance of wrongdoing since it claims it didn't know its contractors hired the illegals.
If it weren't so easy for illegals and employers to skirt worker ID verification, the settlement's requirement that Wal-Mart also improve hiring controls might have a ripple effect in corporate America. But the piddling fine will hardly deter businesses from hiring cheap labor from a pool of illegals that's surged by 23 percent since 2000.
It's commonly argued that Americans don't want the jobs illegals take. But a workforce of perhaps 7 million undocumented workers depresses wages. Those wages would readjust upward, and be attractive to Americans and legal immigrants, if the stream of illegals significantly abated. Promise of work in the US encourages illegal (and dangerous) border crossing. That's why the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 provided for sanctions against businesses that hire the undocumented.
But enforcement is pathetically inadequate, especially since 9/11.
Facing limited resources, immigration officials have necessarily redirected priorities to protecting critical infrastructure. For instance, more than 1,100 unauthorized alien workers with access to sensitive areas at airports have been arrested.
Even so, the sanctions' decline is staggering. In 1999, fines totaling $3.69 million were collected from 890 companies. Last year, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) collected $118,500 from 64 companies. But it levied zero fines. Zero.
Lax enforcement spans administrations, and experts blame the twin pressures of ethnic advocacy and business interests. Decentralized hiring and high turnover compound the problem. Many large corporations have fobbed off hiring responsibility on contractors, and after them come scads of smaller businesses that rely on the undocumented.
That's why it's especially important that local law enforcement be alert. The ICE might never have stumbled upon the Wal-Mart case had it not been for the local police in Honesdale, Pa., whose follow-up on a hit-and-run accident led them to the Wal-Mart workers. But like the feds, state and county governments also face limited resources.
The ICE says Wal-Mart's fine will fund future enforcement. That could be a model - but only if fines amount to more than a slap on the wrist.

No comments: