OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS
HE SPENT HIS FIRST YEAR IN OFFICE HANDING ANY AND EVERYTHING HIS BANKSTER DONORS WANTED, AND THEY WANTED WHAT EVER THEY HAD NOT ALREADY STOLEN!
ONE OF OBAMA’S BIG LIES PRIOR TO CONNING US INTO THE WHITE HOUSE, WAS THAT HE WOULD REVERSE THE SO CALLED “BANKRUPTCY REFORM”, IN FACT WRITTEN BY THE BANKSTERS THAT CAUSED THE MELTDOWN. AFTER THE “REFORM” CONSUMERS COULD NOT GO INTO OPEN COURT AND HAVE THEIR MORTGAGE SCAM FIXED.
THE BANKSTERS’ “BANKRUPTCY REFORM” WAS FRONTED BY THE BANKSTER WHORE DIANNE FEINSTEIN, aka BUSH WAR PROFITEER (YOU SAW HER DELIVERING PART OF OBAMA’S INAUGURAL. HER PIMP HUSBAND SAT RIGHT BEHIND OBAMA, AND IS A MAJOR DONOR TO EVERY CORRUPT DEM OUT THERE).
FEINSTEIN HAS LONG TAKEN BIG BRIBES FROM BIG BANKSTER MOBS LIKE WELLS FARGO & BANK of AMERICA, BOTH MADE OUT LIKE BANK ROBBERS PILLAGING CONSUMERS WITH MORTGAGES THEY TOOK THEIR FEES OFF THE TOP OF AND THEN DUMPED ON UNSUSPECTING INVESTORS.
WELLS FARGO HAS LOOOOOOOONG HAD THEIR CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE LICENSE REVOKED FOR CORPORATE CORRUPTION AND MALFEASANCE. THIS BANK WENT INTO COURT AND DEMANDED IT BE REINSTATED. THE COURT SAID NO! SO THIS BANK SIMPLY DECLARED ITSELF TO BE ABOVE STATE LAW AND WENT TO DESTROY COMMUNITIES ALL OVER THE COUNTY WITH THE SAME PRACTICES.
NONE OF THIS HAD ANY IMPACT ON FEINSTEIN OR OBAMA VOTING FOR THE WELLS FARGO BAILOUT TO BUY OTHER CRIMINAL BANKSTERS!
OBAMA WENT LIMP WHEN IT CAME TO KEEPING HIS PROMISE TO REVERSE THE “BANKRUPTCY REFORM” SO CONSUMERS COULD SEEK LEGAL REDRESS. HE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY WHEN THE BANKSTERS WERE GETTING THEIR NO-STRINGS FREE LOOT.
NOW WHAT HAS OBAMA DONE FOR HOMEOWNERS?
THIS CLOWN CAN’T STOP SERVICING HIS BANKSTER DONORS, LA RAZA DEMS, AND KISSING ILLEGALS ARSE FOR THEIR VOTES!
IN ADDITION, THE REST OF AMERICAN PAYS AND PAYS.
ONE-QUARTER OF ALL HOMES ARE UNDERWATER AND FORECLOSURES ARE SOARING!
Next up: a shift away from home ownership?
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
The Washington Post
WASHINGTON — After President Obama signs into law an overhaul of financial regulation at a ceremony Wednesday, his administration will turn to an area at the root of the financial crisis: the U.S. housing market.
Responding to the collapse in home prices and the huge number of foreclosures, the Obama administration is pursuing an overhaul of government policy that could diverge from the emphasis on homeownership embraced by former administrations.
"In previous eras, we haven't seen people question whether homeownership was the right decision. It was just assumed that's where you want to go," said Raphael Bostic, a senior official in the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). "You're not going to hear us say that."
Bostic, who has published leading scholarship on homeownership, added that owning a home has a lot of value, but "what we've seen in the last four years is that there really is an underside to homeownership."
The administration's narrower view of who should own a home and what the government should do to support them could have major implications for the economy as well as borrowers. Broadly, the administration may wind down some government backing for home loans but increase the focus on affordable rentals.
The shift in approach could mean higher down payments and interest rates on loans, more barriers to lower-income people buying houses and fewer homeowners overall, government officials said. But the change also could pave the way for a more stable housing market, one with fewer taxpayer dollars on the line and less of a risk that homeowners will not be able to pay their mortgages. And it could spell changes throughout the financial markets, as investors choose new places to put their money if the government withdraws incentives for investing in the U.S. mortgage market.
The carnage in the nation's housing market arguably has been the most destructive and enduring element of the recession. Since 2008, the federal government has committed hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it nonrecoverable, to try to keep housing afloat and ensure that borrowers can obtain loans. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage-finance giants seized by the government in September 2008, and the Federal Housing Administration have been nearly the only sources of backing for new loans.
The Obama administration now is beginning to look for ways to gradually unwind the massive government programs supporting homeownership and restore the traditional role of the private sector. Three months ago, the Treasury Department and HUD released seven broad questions about the future of housing. Comments from the public are due Tuesday, and the administration is required by the financial-overhaul legislation to offer a proposal for housing overhaul by year's end, including restructuring or replacing Fannie and Freddie.
The decision to focus more on rental housing and less on homeownership differs in many ways from the Bush and Clinton administrations. President George W. Bush touted an "ownership society" that sought to increase homeownership rates, specifically for low-income people. President Clinton had a "National Homeownership Strategy" that advocated for a specific homeownership rate.
HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan has been most out front in the administration in advocating a new approach. "While we continue to promote affordable homeownership, for many Americans renting will continue to be the only or preferred option," he said in recent congressional testimony.
Other administration officials, such as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, also have called for a new housing-finance system. He has said he favors government support both for homeownership in general and for low-income people.
But the Treasury has been divided about how to communicate its approach and reluctant to discuss it publicly because the housing market remains fragile.
Officials in a new Office of Capital Markets and Housing Finance set up in Treasury are studying options for an overhaul and generally have concluded that federal policy should focus on what they call "sustainable homeownership" and not on simply boosting the homeownership rate.
Andrew Williams, deputy assistant secretary for public affairs, cautioned against reading too much into the notion that the administration's policy differed significantly from previous administrations. "(Y)ou are overreading some kind of hard pivot here," he wrote in an e-mail. It's "just a recognition of how much the foreclosure crisis has hurt homeowners."
Williams declined to make a Treasury official available to discuss the administration's housing policy on the record.
Supporters of rental housing say they perceive an early but markedly different tone from the Obama administration. "My impression is that the administration, at pretty much every level, is serious about a balanced policy," said Vincent O'Donnell of Local Initiatives Support Corp. "Their purpose is to look at and make more workable rental-housing programs."
People on different sides of the debate warn about diverging too far from homeownership policies.
"This is confusing to me — the view that the best way to help someone accumulate savings over time is to subsidize their rent now," said Keith Hennessey, director of the National Economic Council under Bush.
"I want to be careful about the move away from homeownership," said Janis Bowdler of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil-rights group. "We have to define more clearly what we mean by homeownership for low-income families and make sure we don't ... come to a very simplistic reading of our recent history that it was simply lending to low-income families that got us into trouble."
*
More than 40 pct. leave Obama mortgage-aid program
More than 40 percent of homeowners seeking help from the Obama administration's flagship effort to rescue those at risk of foreclosure have dropped out of the program.
By ALAN ZIBEL
AP Real Estate Writer
WASHINGTON —
More than 40 percent of homeowners seeking help from the Obama administration's flagship effort to rescue those at risk of foreclosure have dropped out of the program.
The latest report on the program suggests foreclosures could rise in the second half of the year and weaken an ailing housing market.
About 530,000 borrowers have fallen out of the program as of last month, the Treasury Department said Tuesday. Nearly 1.3 million homeowners had enrolled since March 2009.
Treasury officials say few of these borrowers will wind up in foreclosure. But many analysts are concerned that a new wave of foreclosures could greatly impact the struggling housing industry.
Another 390,000 homeowners, or 30 percent of those who started the program, have received permanent loan modifications and are making payments on time.
A major reason so many have fallen out of the program is the Obama administration initially pressured banks to sign up borrowers without insisting first on proof of their income. When banks later moved to collect the information, many troubled homeowners were disqualified or dropped out.
Many borrowers complain of a bureaucratic nightmare. They say banks often lose their documents and then claim borrowers did not send back the necessary paperwork.
The banking industry said borrowers weren't sending back the necessary paperwork.
The Obama plan was designed to help people in financial trouble by lowering their monthly mortgage payments. Homeowners who qualify can receive an interest rate as low as 2 percent for five years and a longer repayment period. The average monthly payment has been cut by about $500 on average.
The homeowners receive temporary modifications. These are supposed to become permanent after borrowers make three payments on time and complete the required paperwork. That includes proof of income and a letter explaining the reason for their troubles. In practice, though, the process has taken far longer.
The more than 100 participating mortgage companies get taxpayer incentives to reduce payments. But as of mid-May only $132 million has been spent out of a potential $75 billion, according to the Government Accountability Office.
Though the program has been widely criticized for making only a small dent in the foreclosure crisis, administration officials defend their efforts. They say that the foreclosure prevention program has spurred changes in the mortgage industry, prodding lenders to make more significant cuts to borrowers' monthly payments than before the government effort started.
No comments:
Post a Comment