Saturday, July 17, 2010

MEXICO - HOME TO LARGEST NUMBER OF BILLIONAIRES & DRUG CARTELS

EVERY WONDER WHY THE NEW YORK TIMES SELDOM HAS AN ARTICLE ON THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION? GO TO LOS ANGELES TIMES, AND DO SEARCH FOR MEXICAN GANGS OR MEXICO UNDER SIEGE AND COMPARE.
THE REASON WHY THE NYT DOESN’T IS BECAUSE IT’S OWNED BY A DIRTY LITTLE MEX MONSTER NAMED CARLOS “THE CORPORATE JACKAL” SLIM. THE NYTIMES CAN’T HISPANDER ENOUGH. CAN’T KISS THE ILLEGALS’ ASS ENOUGH. CAN’T PUBLISH AN ARTICLE ON THE STAGGERING COST TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS OF BEING MEXICO’S WELFARE SYSTEM, SO SCUM LIKE CARLOS SLIM AND POCKET MEXICO’S ECONOMY!

HERE’S HOW THE MEXICAN OLIGARCHY GETS TO POCKET THE MEXICAN ECONOMY: PACK UP THEIR POOR --- ABOUT 95% OF THE POPULATION, THEIR CRIMINAL AND FREQUENTLY PREGNANT AND SHIP THEM OVER THE BORDER TO GRINGOLAND, WHICH WE ALL KNOW IS REALLY JUST A NORTHERN MEXICAN TERRITORY!
THEN WITH THE TENS OF BILLIONS OF MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL MONEY WIRED BACK TO NARCOMEX BY LA RAZA DONORS, WELLS FARGO AND BANK OF AMERICA, YOU BUY ENOUGH PEONS TO CLEAN UP, AND TAKE THE TRASH OUT.
FOR GRINGOS, THERE’S A REASON WHY THE HIGHLY RACIST POLITICAL PART OF LA RAZA “THE RACE” IS BANKROLLED NOT ONLY BY THE FORTUNE 500, BUT BY YOUR TAX DOLLARS. YES, YOUR TAXES ARE SPENT FOR A FOREIGN POLITICAL PARTY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION = DEPRESS WAGES FOR WALL ST BY TAXES. THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE DEM THAT DOES NOT SUPPORT TAX DOLLARS TO LA RAZA AND PROMOTE OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY, NO ENGLISH ONLY, NO ID FOR ILLEGALS TO ILLEGALLY VOTE, AND NO ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS. AT THE TOP OF THE LIST OF LA RAZA ENDORSED POLITICIANS IS:
OBAMA
KENNEDY
FEINSTEIN
BOXER
PELOSI
REID
WAXMAN
CLINTON
*
THE NEW YORKER
PROFILES
SLIM’S TIME
Who is Carlos Slim, and does he want the paper of record?
by Lawrence Wright JUNE 1, 2009
LAWRENCE WRIGHT, PROFILES, “SLIM’S TIME,” THE NEW YORKER, JUNE 1, 2009, P. 52
ABSTRACT: PROFILE of Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim.

Writer describes how Slim came to lend two hundred and fifty million dollars to the New York Times Company in 2008. In return, the Times awarded him stock-purchase warrants on 15.9 million shares. Slim became the company’s largest creditor and was poised to become one of its largest stockholders. In modern history, no one has dominated a major economy the way Carlos Slim does that of Mexico. Slim and his heirs control more than two hundred companies. His portfolio contains Inbursa, one of Mexico’s most prominent banks, Volaris, an airline; a mining company, a cigarette manufacturer, and much valuable real estate. The foundation of his empire is Telmex, the telecommunications company, which he acquired in 1990, and the cell-phone business, América Móvil, which is now the third-largest company in Latin America. Although Slim has often been described as a merciless predator, he has never been caught in one of the scandals that periodically spill onto the front pages of Mexican newspapers. His nationalism, humility, and relatively modest personal habits stand as a kind of rebuke to the image that Mexicans typically have of their oligarchs. Tells about Slim’s father, Khalil, who emigrated to Mexico from Lebanon and became a successful merchant. Describes Slim’s childhood and his early interest in numbers and money. He invested from a youthful age and abandoned engineering to go into business. Discusses Slim’s visit to the 1964 World’s Fair and its influence on his interest in technology. Writer gives a brief history of the Times’s recent economic difficulties and considers why Slim would be interested in the paper. Also tells about David Geffen’s bid for the Times. Writer chronicles the growth of Slim’s business holdings from the mid-sixties to his acquisition of Telmex. Slim has often used recessions as an opportunity to buy businesses at reduced prices. Writer interviews Randall Stephenson, who worked for Slim in the nineties. “He’s probably the most intelligent businessman I’ve met,” Stephenson says. Discusses how Slim challenged the established ideas on pricing wireless service and spun off América Móvil, one of the most profitable telecom companies in the world. Tells about the Mexican government’s efforts to reform the telecom sector and allow for greater competition and its attempt to broker a deal with Slim that would allow him access to the television market. Mentions Slim’s acquisition of substantial amounts of Saks Fifth Avenue stock. Discusses criticism of Slim by the writer Denise Dresser, who believes that Slim is emblematic of crony capitalism in Mexico. Mentions Slim’s charitable activities and his comments on the Bush and Obama plans to rescue the faltering U.S. economy.
………………….
“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
WHY THE NEW JOBS GO TO IMMIGRANTS

By David R. Francis

Wall Street cheered and stock prices rose when the US Labor Department announced last Friday that employers had expanded their payrolls by 262,000 positions in February.
But it wasn't entirely good news. The statisticians also indicated that the share of the adult population holding jobs had slipped slightly from January to 62.3 percent. That's now two full percentage points below the level in the brief recession that began in March 2001.

Why the apparent contradiction? Reasons abound: population growth, rising retirements. But one factor that gets little attention is immigration. In the past four years, the number of immigrants into the US, legal and illegal, has closely matched the number of new jobs. That suggests newcomers have, in effect, snapped up all of the new jobs. "There has been no net job gain for natives," says
THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

Immigration bill sticker shock $127 BILLION (dated)

“WE ARE NOW JUST BEGINNING TO SEE A GLIMPSE OF THE STAGGERING BURDEN ON AMERICAN TAXPAYERS” OF THE MEXICAN INVASION.......

A government study puts the cost of the Senate's version of reform at $127 billion over 10 years.

By Gail Russell Chaddock - Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
WASHINGTON
The price tag for comprehensive immigration reform was not a key issue when the Senate passed its bill last May. But it is now.
One reason: It took the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) - the gold standard for determining what a bill will cost - until last week to estimate that federal spending for this vast and complex bill would hit $127 billion over the next 10 years.
At the same time, federal revenues would drop by about $79 billion, according to the CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation. If lawmakers fix a tax glitch, that loss would be cut in half, they add.
In field hearings across the nation this month, House GOP leaders are zeroing in on the costs of the Senate bill. It's a bid to define the issue heading into fall elections and muster support for the House bill, which focuses on border security. They say that the more people know about the Senate version, including a path to citizenship for some 11 million people now in the country illegally, the less they will be inclined to support it.

“WE ARE NOW JUST BEGINNING TO SEE A GLIMPSE OF THE STAGGERING BURDEN ON AMERICAN TAXPAYERS” OF THE MEXICAN INVASION.......
"We are now just beginning to see a glimpse of the staggering burden on American taxpayers the Reid-Kennedy immigration legislation contains," said House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, who convened a field hearing at the State House in Concord, N.H., Thursday on the costs of the Senate bill.
But business groups and others backing the Senate bill say that the cost to the US economy of not resolving the status of illegal immigrants and expanding guest-worker programs is higher still. "In my opinion, the fairer question is: How will illegal immigrants impact the costs of healthcare, local education, and social services without passage of comprehensive immigration reform?" said John Young, co-chairman of the Agriculture Coalition for Immigration Reform, at Thursday's hearing.
"Had we solved this problem in a truly comprehensive way in 1986 ... we would not have the daily news reporting outright shortages of farm labor threatening the very existence of agricultural industries coast to coast," he adds.

Experts are poring over the new CBO data - and coming up with radically different assessments of the social costs of reform, ranging from tens of billions of dollars higher to a net wash.
On the issue of border security - a feature in both bills - there is little disagreement. The CBO estimates that the cost of hardening US borders in the Senate bill is $78.3 billion over 10 years, or about 62 percent of the bill's total cost.
The fireworks involve new entitlement spending in the Senate version. The CBO sets the price tag for services for some 16 million new citizens and guest workers at $48.4 billion through fiscal year 2016. That includes $24.5 billion for earned income and child tax credits, $11.7 billion for Medicaid, $5.2 billion for Social Security, $3.7 billion for Medicare, and $2.4 billion for food stamps.
But it's easier to estimate the cost of a mile of fence than to assess the prospects for millions of workers, once they can work legally and claim benefits.

“THE AMNESTY ALONE WILL BE THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE WELFARE SYSTEM IN THE LAST 25 YEARS” Heritage Foundation
"The amnesty alone will be the largest expansion of the welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector, a senior analyst at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary Committee field hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to hit their peak around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very narrow time horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If even a small fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on Medicaid, you're looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year."
*
Your Tax Dollars To Fund Illegal Immigration
________________________________________
Reply to: see below
Date: 2007-12-04, 11:56AM PST


United States Representative Ruben Hinojosa from Texas has introduced a bill that will fund the pro-illegal immigration group: The National Council of La Raza (NCLR). This bill, the Hope Fund Act of 2007 (H.R. 1999) would appropriate $5 million to NCLR in 2008 and $10 million each year thereafter.

The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration”

To get updates on the pillage of the middle class and the Mexican invasion and occupation, sign up for LOU DOBBS’ daily program emails.

AMERICAN TAXPAYERS BEING FORCED TO SUPPORT LATINO NAZI PARTY
By Dave Gibson (09/17/2006) http://americandaily.com/article/15577
In 2005, the Latino group known as La Raza (The Race) was given $15.2 million in U.S. federal grants. La Raza also received an additional $4 million in so-called 'earmarks' tucked into the 2005 Housing Bill, which our Congress passed and President Bush signed. Considering the racist agenda of La Raza, giving federal funds to this group is tantamount to the U.S. funding the Nazis in the 1930's. The comparison to the Nazi Party is well deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino Americans out of a portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call for 'Reconquista' or the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the re-occupation of the Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is the utopian all-Latino version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf Hitler planned to called his utopia Germania).
BILL CLINTON ATTENDS RACIST PARTY CONVENTION WITH BUSH’S ARCHITECT OF OPEN BORDERS FOR DEPRESSED WAGES, KARL ROVE
Karl Rove was one of the keynote speakers at this year's annual National Council of La Raza Conference. The event was held in Los Angeles (the eventual capital of Atzlan). Other speakers included Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, and the virulent racist L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The fact that Karl Rove is the President's top political adviser and addressed the group with Bush's blessing, is a strong indicator that this nation is being subverted at the very highest levels. If La Raza was a white supremacist group with equally deep pockets, the U.S. government would place them on a terrorist watch list, infiltrate them with undercover FBI agents, and subject them to constant harassment by the Internal Revenue Service. Eventually, the group's leaders would be jailed and the group itself would be rendered irrelevant. However, because La Raza is a Latino supremacist group, the Bush administration and most of Congress offer them financial support! One of La Raza's biggest supporters is Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV). In 2001, Reid asked the Senate Appropriations Committee for $5 million to help further the racist goals of that organization. That same year, La Raza gave Sen. Reid their Capital Award for "his commitment to advance legislation priorities of the Latino community." Reid in turn praised La Raza by saying: "La Raza is like the biblical David, fighting all these Goliaths." Taxpayer funds are also funneled to La Raza through the Department of Health and Human Services, The Environmental Protection Agency, and even NASA. Tax dollars are hidden in these government agencies, earmarked to be specifically given away to La Raza. Inside the halls of Congress, the practice is known as discretionary funding...In the real world it is known as money laundering! In 2005, $7.9 million was stolen from the American taxpayers and given out to Latino-only charter schools in the form of U.S. Department of Education grants. The following is a list of a few of those schools: -La Academia Semillas del Pueblo (Los Angeles) -Atzlan Academy (Tucson, AZ) -Mexicayotl Academy (Nogales, AZ) -The Dolores Huerta Prepatory High School (Pueblo, CO) -Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School (St. Paul, MN) These schools stress Latino culture, the Spanish language, the reconquest of the American Southwest, ethnic cleansing and the establishment of the mythical Atzlan, and even Aztec math!...Again, all taught on your dime! According to the Capital Research Center, La Raza has assets well in excess of $50 million. This same group reports that La Raza spends about $1 million annually on lobbying and fundraising. Can you imagine a high-ranking member of the Roosevelt administration making a trip to Berlin to show support for the Nazi Party? Or perhaps the Congress appropriating money to the Ku Klux Klan? While those scenarios both sound absurd, the support that our elected officials are giving to the racist group known as La Raza is no different. One has to wonder, if the KKK offered extremely cheap labor to unscrupulous American businesses and potential votes to equally unscrupulous politicians...Would Congress fund whites-only charter schools? Posted by Mark Finkelstein on March 28, 2006 - 09:03.

No comments: