Thursday, July 14, 2011

U.S. SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS STATES' AUTHORITY to REQUIRE USE OF E-VERIFY

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds States’ Authority to Require Use of E-Verify
*

THERE IS NOTHING THAT WOULD HINDER THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION AND EXPANDING WELFARE STATE THAN TO KEEP THEM OUT OF OUR JOBS!

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE HALF OF THOSE WITH A JOB ARE ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THIS SAME COUNTY PUTS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS AND IS CHARACTERIZED BY THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR AS THE “MEXICAN GANG CAPITAL OF AMERICA”. THE CA ATTORNEY GENERAL DECLARES THAT NEARLY HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!

OBAMA, AND HIS LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION, INCLUDING HIS SEC. OF LABOR, HILDA SOLIS (LA RAZA SUPREMACY PARTY) ARE FIGHTING TOOTH AND NAIL AGAINST E-VERIFY! SO IS THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BENT ON KEEPING ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS, AND WAGES DEPRESSED!
IN MEXIFORNIA, LA RAZA ENDORSED FEINSTEIN, PELOSI, BOXER, LOFGREN, ALONG WITH THE HISPANIC CAUCUS MEMBERS (LA RAZA IN CONGRESS), Reps. BECERRA, BACA AND THE FAMOUS SANCHEZ SISTERS, HAVE ALL VOWED TO FIGHT E-VERIFY! THEY WERE ALL PUT IN OFFICE WITH THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS!!!

*
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds States’ Authority to Require
Use of E-Verify

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a 2007 Arizona law requiring all employers in the state to use the E-Verify system to check that the workers they hire are legally eligible to hold jobs in the U.S. In addition to requiring the use of E-Verify, the law, known as the Arizona Legal Workers Act, allows the state to suspend and/or revoke the business licenses of employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. The Chamber of Commerce filed suit in 2007 seeking to have the law struck down. That effort was supported by the Obama administration, which filed a brief in 2010 in support of the Chamber’s lawsuit.
By a 5-3 ruling on Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 563 U.S. (2011), the Court rejected each of the plaintiff’s arguments and held that the Arizona Legal Workers Act is constitutional. (Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the case because of her previous role as Solicitor General in the Obama administration.) Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts held that Arizona’s requirement that businesses use E-Verify “is entirely consistent with federal law. And the consequences of not using E-Verify under Arizona law are the same as the consequences of not using the system under federal law.”
The Court also reaffirmed the principle that state and local governments have a legitimate role to play in the enforcement of immigration policy. “As with any piece of legislation, Congress did indeed seek to strike a balance among a variety of interests when it enacted IRCA. Part of that balance, however, involved allocating authority between the Federal Government and the States,” wrote the Chief Justice.
The Supreme Court also upheld Arizona’s right to suspend or revoke the licenses of businesses that knowingly employ illegal aliens. In its suit, the Chamber contended that Arizona’s policy violated a provision of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) which preempted state and local penalties against employers who hire illegal aliens. The Court flatly dismissed the Chamber’s contention stating that Arizona’s licensing law “falls well within the confines of the authority that Congress chose to leave to the States…”
The majority opinion also rejected the argument that the Arizona law was not a licensing scheme, but an effort to make an end run around the IRCA preemption provision. That argument, too, was flatly rejected, calling it “contrary to common sense” with “no basis in law, fact or logic.”
The Whiting decision was a clear and unequivocal victory for the immigration reform movement and, potentially, for American workers all across the country. It is nearly universally acknowledged that the lure of jobs is the single biggest draw for illegal immigration. The Whiting decision provides a green light to state and local governments to require employers to check work eligibility using E-Verify and to revoke the business licenses of companies that knowingly hire illegal aliens. The ruling empowers other states to take similar measures to protect legal U.S. workers from losing jobs and wages to illegal workers and to discourage illegal aliens from settling or remaining within those jurisdictions.
Armed with this clear legal precedent, FAIR will continue its work of promoting meaningful state and local policies aimed at deterring illegal immigration. With strong public support for state-based measures and unquestionable legal authority for states to pursue such policies, FAIR expects to be able to expand its work with legislators around the country to provide similar protections to American workers in other states.
FAIR and the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) take special pride in having helped shape the Arizona Legal Workers Act and subsequently defend both in the courts and at the ballot box. In addition to the failed lawsuit, the Chamber launched an ill-fated attempt in 2009 to gut the law through a deceptive ballot initiative. FAIR’s efforts to expose the Chamber’s deception contributed to the initiative’s defeat by Arizona
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/07/unemployment-for-legals-not-high-enough.html

*
“The president's straddling can work for the time being. But unless he wants to end up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually have to hop on one horse and lead the way. That would have to be the horse named "Enforcement First." CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
Illegals make more than US workers
Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Ready? Now pay attention...
Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year.. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631 .00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $280.00 per family member/ month federal CASH AID for four family members . Jose Illegal has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.
Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $ 43,200.00. stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.."actually Jose illegal doesn't pay for most utilities in many states as he gets county assistance to pay the bills and his late fees"
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work. "and pays a higher tax rate if he earns above a certain amount"
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
…. AND THEN JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILL TO SUPPORT ALL THIS “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR, AND THE CRIME TIDAL WAVE THAT COMES WITH THE OCCUPATION!

*
“THE AMNESTY ALONE WILL BE THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE WELFARE SYSTEM IN THE LAST 25 YEARS” Heritage Foundation
"The amnesty alone will be the largest expansion of the welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector, a senior analyst at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary Committee field hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to hit their peak around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very narrow time horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If even a small fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on Medicaid, you're looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year."

No comments: