FAIRUS.org
U.S. Taxpayers Spend
$113 Billion Annually on Illegal Aliens
|
|
America has never been able to afford the costs of illegal
immigration. With rising unemployment and skyrocketing deficits, federal and
state lawmakers are now facing the results of failed policies. A new,
groundbreaking report from FAIR, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers,
takes a comprehensive look at the estimated fiscal costs resulting from
federal, state and local expenditures on illegal aliens and their U.S.-born
children.
Expanding upon the series of state studies done in the
past, FAIR has estimated the annual cost of illegal immigration to be $113
billion, with much of the cost — $84.2 billon — coming at the state and local
level.
|
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS
TO CUT WAGES!
“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs
taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”
*
MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO LA RAZA – THE MEXICAN
FASCIST POLITICAL PARTY. THESE FIGURES ARE DATED. CNN CALCULATES THAT WAGES ARE
DEPRESSED $300 - $400 BILLION PER YEAR!
“The principal
beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire
immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George
Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed
wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.”
Christian Science Monitor
*
Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
FAIRUS.org
FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION REFORM
FAIR CHARACTERIZES THE OBAMA,
AND LA RAZA DEMS PLAN FOR AMNESTY AS FOLLOWS:
That's
why, throughout 2009 FAIR has been tracking every move the administration and
Congress has made to undermine our immigration laws, reward illegal aliens and
burden taxpayers.
- Foot-dragging
on proven methods of immigration law enforcement including border
structures and E-Verify.
- Appointment
of several illegal alien advocates to important administration posts.
- Watering
down of the 287(g) program to limit local law in their own jurisdictions.
- Health care
reform that mandates a “public option” for newly-arrived legal immigrants
as well as illegal aliens.
*
! YOU LIE! THE BELOW IS EXACTLY
WHAT THE DEMS DO TO US EVERY DAY. THEY LIE ABOUT DEFENDED OUR BORDERS, JOBS,
AND CULTURE, WHILE THEY CONTINUALLY PUT OUT INDUCEMENTS FOR MORE ILLEGALS TO
CLIMB OUR BORDERS, AND HEAD FOR THE VOTING BOOTHS!
*
OBAMA STACKS HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY MEMBERS!
Immigration
will be Obama's Waterloo. We now know Obama is a closet leftist radical
who has a tin ear when it comes to listening to the American people.
Obama has appointed immigration radicals to high positions in his
Administration such as Hilda Solis (Secretary of Labor), Senior White House
Advisor Celia Munoz (former Sr. Vice President of La Raza), and ICE’s William
Hurtt. These actions stand in stark contrast to the clearly expressed
will of the vast majority of American people, who want our existing immigration
laws enforced, our border brought under control, and no grant of amnesty to
millions of law breaking illegal aliens who are wreaking havoc on our
society -- and who cost taxpaying Americans a lot of money. The American public
will not permit mass amnesty to be granted to illegal aliens -- before or after
November. Too many American citizens and legal residents understand the
enormous stakes at play (including the very future of this country).
Obama sees 12-20 million new voter registration cards – and he does not care if
they are submitted by people who have no right to be in our country, whose
first act coming here was to break our laws, and who if granted amnesty will
literally bankrupt us.
*
“What's
needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known
for years: Enforce existing law.” ….. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
INVESTORS.com
Amnesty In Disguise
Posted 08/10/2010 06:51 PM ET
Border: After
suing Arizona to assert federal supremacy over states on immigration, it turns
out that ICE, Washington's immigration cop on the beat, isn't enforcing the law
at all. This is amnesty by another name.
Oh,
what a hullabaloo the Justice Department made last month over Arizona's SB
1070, arguing before a federal district judge that the law must be struck down
because the federal government has "pre-eminent authority to regulate
immigration matters."
Arizona's
effort was depicted as some sort of secessionist usurpation of federal
prerogatives, despite the fact that SB 1070 mirrored federal law.
Incredibly,
Judge Susan Bolton, an appointee of President Clinton, agreed and issued an
injunction on those grounds.
In
practical terms, her decision means that Arizona's 15,000 lawmen could not help
federal agents enforce the law on America's largest and most dangerous
immigrant-smuggling corridor.
Now
it's obvious why: The Justice Department isn't interested in enforcing the law.
Last
week, 259 representatives of the union that represents 7,000 Immigration and
Customs Enforcement agents handed down a unanimous vote of "no
confidence" in ICE leaders, whose policies keep them from doing their job.
Based
on those policies, agents can no longer arrest illegal immigrants even if they
announce their status on a sandwich board.
According
to a June 29 memo from ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton, ICE must now
"prioritize the apprehension and removal of aliens who only pose a threat
to national security and/or public safety, such as criminals and
terrorists."
Given
that all police agencies look for such targets, such a premise is absurd.
Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, after all, was arrested by a traffic cop,
not a fancy anti-terror strike force, in 1995.
And
aside from wondering why terrorists are being released at all across a border
they'll have no trouble recrossing, Morton's policy effectively means no one is
looking for illegal immigrants once they make it past the Border Patrol.
This is
taking pick-and-choose law enforcement to an extreme and runs counter to best
police practices, such as James Q. Wilson's "broken window" theory of
criminology. This holds that enforcement against minor crimes in an area helps
prevent an escalation into more serious crime.
ICE's
Morton claims the agency has limited resources, so it can deport only 400,000
illegal immigrants a year. From a government agency with a $2.6 billion
detention and removal budget, that comes to about $6,500 per deportee, a de
facto statement of government inefficiency and waste. And it affects only 4% of
all illegal border-crossers.
*
OBAMA LOADS OUR SECURITY WITH OPEN BORDERS – AMNESTY
LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS….
*
Heather Mac Donald: White House doesn't
want to enforce immigration
By: Heather Mac Donald
OpEd Contributor
August 4, 2010
OpEd Contributor
August 4, 2010
The real motivation for the
Justice Department's lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration statute was the
only one not mentioned in the department's brief: The Obama administration has
no intention of enforcing the immigration laws against the majority of illegal
aliens already in the country.
It is that policy alone
which conflicts with SB 1070: Arizona wants to enforce the law; the Obama
administration does not. Reasonable minds can differ on whether that conflict
puts Arizona in violation of the Constitution's Supremacy Clause.
But what is indisputable is
that the failure of the federal government to openly acknowledge the real
ground for its opposition to SB 1070 has rendered incoherent not just its own
public arguments against the law, but the judicial ruling which largely rubber
stamps those arguments as well.
The Arizona statute affirms
the power of a local police officer or sheriff's deputy to inquire into
someone's immigration status, if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the
person is in the country illegally, and if doing so is practicable. Under SB
1070, such an inquiry may occur only during a lawful stop to investigate a
non-immigration offense.
Both the Justice Department
and U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton, in striking down most of SB 1070, couched
their opposition to the statute exclusively in terms of its effect on legal, as
opposed to illegal, aliens. SB 1070, Judge Bolton wrote, would impermissibly
burden legal immigrants already in the country by subjecting them to
unwarranted immigration checks.
There are two problems with
this line of argument: First, it ignores the fact that Congress has already
anticipated and approved precisely the sort of local immigration inquiries that
Judge Bolton now finds unconstitutional. Second, the argument would make all
immigration enforcement impossible.
In 1996, Congress banned
so-called sanctuary policies, by which cities and states prohibit their
employees from working with federal immigration authorities regarding illegal
aliens. It was in the federal interest, Congress declared, that local and
federal authorities cooperate in the "apprehension, detention or removal
of [illegal] aliens."
In pursuance of that
mandate, the federal government operates an immigration clearinghouse, the Law
Enforcement Support Center (LESC), to provide just the sort of
immigration-status information to local and state law-enforcement officials
that SB 1070 seeks.
It is therefore absurd to
now claim, as Judge Bolton and the Obama Administration do, that such local
inquiries conflict with the federal immigration scheme. It is even more absurd
to argue that the risk that a legal alien will be questioned about his
immigration status makes the alleged conflict unconstitutional.
Any immigration enforcement
carries the possibility that a legal alien or U.S. citizen will be stopped and
questioned. The only way to guarantee that legal aliens are never asked to
present their immigration papers is to suspend immigration enforcement
entirely. (The same possibility of stopping innocent people for questioning
applies to law enforcement generally; that possibility has never been held to
invalidate the police investigative power.)
If Congress intended to
create such a blanket ban on asking legal aliens for proof of legal residency,
it could have revoked the 1952 law requiring aliens to carry their certificate
of alien registration. Such a requirement makes sense only on the assumption
that legal aliens will upon occasion be asked to prove their legal status.
Such unpersuasive reasoning
suggests that something else is going on. That something is the fact that SB
1070 would have put the Obama administration in the uncomfortable position of
repeatedly telling Arizona's law enforcement officers that it is not interested
in detaining or deporting the illegal aliens that they have encountered in the
course of their duties; the law, in other words, would have exposed the
administration's de facto amnesty policy.
And SB 1070 would have
shown that immigration-law enforcement can work simply by creating a deterrent
to illegal entry and presence. Even before it went into operation, the Arizona
law was already inducing illegal aliens to leave the state, according to news
reports.
Illegal aliens are
virtually absent from the Justice Department's brief or from Judge Bolton's
opinion. Despite this studied avoidance, it's time to have a public debate
about how much immigration enforcement this country wants and which enforcement
policies--the administration's or Arizona's -- best represent the public will.
Heather
Mac Donald is a contributing editor of City Journal and co-author of The
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/White-House-doesn_t-want-to-enforce-immigration-1007060-99891419.html#ixzz0w8gI2nha
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIALWATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
IN FACT THERE ARE SO MANY MILLIONS OF MEXICANS USING
FRAUDULENT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS WITH COMMON HISPANIC NAMES, THAT E-VERIFY
MAY BE ALREADY BE A WASTE OF TIME.
HOWEVER,
EVEN WITH THE STAGGERING UNEMPLOYMENT, FOR WHICH OBAMA HAS DONE NADA, HE’S
STILL MAKING IT EASY FOR ILLEGALS TO TAKE OUR JOBS
Obama
Administration Challenges Arizona E-Verify Law
The Obama administration has asked the
Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law
that punishes employers who hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor
Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Brief). Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law
requires all employers in Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the
business licenses of those who hire illegal workers shall be repealed.
From the date of enactment, the Chamber of Commerce and other special interest
groups have been trying to undo it, attacking it through a failed ballot
initiative and also through a lawsuit. Now the Chamber is asking the United
States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria),
and the Obama Administration is weighing in against the law.
To date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has
been upheld by all lower courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as an exercise of a state’s
traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010). Obama’s Justice Department, however,
disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said in his filing with the
Supreme Court that the lower courts were wrong to uphold the statute because
federal immigration law expressly preempts any state law imposing sanctions on
employers hiring illegal immigrants. Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a
licensing law, but “a statute that prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens
and uses suspension and revocation of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate
sanction.” (Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Brief, p. 10). This is the administration’s first court
challenge to a state’s authority to act against illegal immigration, and could
be a preview of the battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration
crackdown through SB 1070.
Napolitano has made no comment on the
Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the 2007 law, but federal
officials said that she has taken an active part in the debate over whether to
do so. (Politico,
May 28, 2010). As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed
the state law was valid and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it.
(Id.).
206
Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are
hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.
Why do Americans still protect the illegals??
http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=
*
Why do Americans still protect the illegals??
http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=
*
TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
OBAMA HAS FILLED HIS
ADMINSTRATION WITH PRIMARILY LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS.
Here’s his Sec. Labor, HILDA
SOLIS:
While in Congress, she
opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of illegal alien
benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition discounts), embraced
sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal homeland security
officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively championed a mass
amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker organizing movement
in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting Big Labor groups
led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now caused a Capitol
Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and outreach campaign
to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
Michelle Malkin
The U.S. Department of Illegal Alien Labor
President
Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is supposed to represent American workers.
What you need to know is that this longtime open-borders sympathizer has always
had a rather radical definition of "American." At a Latino voter
registration project conference in Los Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted
to thunderous applause, "We are all Americans, whether you are legalized or
not."
That's
right. The woman in charge of enforcing our employment laws doesn't give a hoot
about our immigration laws -- or about the fundamental distinction between
those who followed the rules in pursuit of the American dream and those who
didn't.
While in Congress, she
opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of illegal alien
benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition discounts), embraced
sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal homeland security officials
to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively championed a mass amnesty. Solis
was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker organizing movement in Southern
California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting Big Labor groups led by the
Service Employees International Union. She has now caused a Capitol Hill
firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and outreach campaign to
illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
"I'm
here to tell you that your president, your secretary of labor and this
department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her rightful pay --
especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard and often
dangerous hours," Solis says in the video pitch. "We can help, and we
will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our laws. And you
can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those protections
work for you."
To be
sure, no one should be scammed out of "fair wages." Employers that
hire and exploit illegal immigrant workers deserve full sanctions and
punishment. But it's the timing, tone-deafness and underlying blanket amnesty
agenda of Solis' illegal alien outreach that has so many American workers and
their representatives on Capitol Hill rightly upset.
With
double-digit unemployment and a growing nationwide revolt over Washington's
border security failures, why has Solis chosen now to hire 250 new government
field investigators to bolster her illegal alien workers' rights campaign?
(Hint: Leftists unhappy with Obama's lack of progress on "comprehensive
immigration reform" need appeasing. This is a quick bone to distract
them.)
Unfortunately,
the federal government is not alone in lavishing attention and resources on
workers who shouldn't be here in the first place. As of 2008, California,
Florida, Nevada, New York, Texas and Utah all expressly included illegal aliens
in their state workers' compensation plans -- and more than a dozen other
states implicitly cover them.
Solis'
public service announcement comes on the heels of little-noticed but far more
troubling comments encouraging illegal alien workers in the Gulf Coast. Earlier
this month, in the aftermath of the BP oil spill, according to Spanish language
publication El Diario La Prensa, Solis signaled that her department was going
out of its way to shield illegal immigrant laborers involved in cleanup
efforts. "My purpose is to assist the workers with respect to safety and
protection," she said. "We're protecting all workers regardless of
migration status because that's the federal law." She told reporters that
her department was in talks with local Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) officials who had visited coastal worksites to try to verify that workers
were legal.
No word
yet on whether she gave ICE her "we are all Americans, whether you are
legalized or not" lecture. But it's a safe bet.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
From the above blog,
email articles to those concerned about Obama’s endless push for amnesty.
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE and PRISON SYSTEMS!
“Mexico’s government has
provided its nationals with valuable tools to help them cross the border safely
but Dominguez is the first American resident, with a salary provided by U.S.
taxpayers, to openly promote such a gadget. A few years ago Mexican officials
published a 32-page booklet (Guia Del Migrante Mexicano) with safety
tips for border crossers and distributed hand-held satellite devices to ensure
the violators complete their journey safely.”
No comments:
Post a Comment