“PHOENIX
– The state senator in Arizona who wrote the nation's toughest law against
illegal immigrants said Tuesday he's collecting support across the country from
legislators to challenge automatic U.S. citizenship to the children of illegal
immigrants.”
IT’S A DIFFERENT STORY IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA! LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. THESE CHILDREN OF ILLEGALS WILL STILL BE MEXICAN CITIZENS AND RAISED TO ABHOR ANYTHING AMERICAN, INCLUDING ENGLISH!
CALIFORNIA, THE FORMER AMERICAN STATE, NOW
UNDER LA RAZA OCCUPATION, IS IN MELTDOWN.
THE STATE OPERATES DEFICITS OF $28 BILLION PER YEAR, AND STILL PAYS OUT
$20 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS!IT’S A DIFFERENT STORY IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA! LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. THESE CHILDREN OF ILLEGALS WILL STILL BE MEXICAN CITIZENS AND RAISED TO ABHOR ANYTHING AMERICAN, INCLUDING ENGLISH!
ALL DEMS IN CA ARE PUSHING TO EXPAND LA
RAZA SUPREMACY, AND THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE!
MEXIFORNIA IS A STATE WHERE ILLEGALS GET
THE JOBS FIRST! THE LA RAZA FACTION OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE
Through love of having children, we are going to take
over."
---Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets
---Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets
YOU’RE PAYING FOR ALL THIS ANCHOR BABY WELFARE TO EXPAND MEXICO’S WELFARE SYSTEM IN OUR BORDERS!
WE ARE
MEXICO’S WELFARE, BIRTHING CENTERS, JOBS & JAILS program!
Mexico
expands their occupation of our country by birthing anchors! Mexico is a
shameless nation that exports their pregnant women, poor, illiterate and
criminals over our borders.
When an
illegal gives birth to her child at our expense, she collects welfare for the
next 18 years. During these years she will teach her child they are Mexicans!
NOT AMERICANS! She will teach her child to demand that Spanish be spoken by
legals. She will watch with pride as her child marches waving a Mexican flag
demanding no-strings OBAMA AMNESTY!
CHILDREN
BORN IN THE UNITED STATES BY MEXICAN ILLEGALS ARE AUTOMATICALLY MEXICAN
CITIZENS.
WHAT ARE
YOU DOING TO EXPAND THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION?
OBAMA AND
THE LA RAZA DEMS ARE CUTTING SOCIAL PROGRAMS, SUCH AS SOCIAL SECURITY, EVEN AS
THEY’VE TRIED REPEATEDLY TO HAND OVER SSI TO ILLEGALS!
*
CHILDREN
OF ILLEGALS BORN HERE AT YOUR COST, ARE AUTOMATICALLY CITIZENS OF MEXICO!
State
Law makers preparing citizenship legislation (Will this help win for the
republicans)
State lawmakers preparing citizenship legislation
Davenport And Amanda Lee Myers, Associated Press Writers – Tue Oct 19, 9:27 pm ET
Davenport And Amanda Lee Myers, Associated Press Writers – Tue Oct 19, 9:27 pm ET
*
PHOENIX – The state senator in Arizona who wrote the nation's toughest law against illegal immigrants said Tuesday he's collecting support across the country from legislators to challenge automatic U.S. citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.
Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce's target is the 14th Amendment, but it is unclear how the state lawmaker can or will influence a federal statue.
"This is a battle of epic proportions," Pearce said Tuesday during a news conference at the Arizona Capitol. "We've allowed the hijacking of the 14th Amendment."
Pearce declined to say how the legislation will differ from similar measures that have been introduced in each two-year congressional session since 2005. None of them made it out of committee.
He and another Arizona lawmaker did argue that wording in the amendment that guarantees citizenship to people born in the U.S. who are "subject to the jurisdiction" of this country does not apply to the children of illegal immigrants because such families don't owe sole allegiance to the U.S.
The efforts by Pearce and the other lawmakers come amid calls to change the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Supporters cite costs to taxpayers for services provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
Changing the Constitution is difficult.
It requires approval by two-thirds majorities in both chambers of Congress, an impossibility now because Democrats have the majority in both houses and most oppose such a measure. Even if Republicans gain power in November and legislation is passed, an amendment would still need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states.
Paul Bender, a constitutional law professor at Arizona State University, said if the lawmakers focus their argument on the "subject to jurisdiction" wording, they won't get very far because the founders only meant it to apply to the children of foreign diplomats born in the U.S.
"If the British ambassador and his wife have a child in the U.S., that child is not a citizen because he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. We cannot put him in jail, we cannot even give him a parking ticket," Bender said.
The 14th Amendment "could have easily have said you're a citizen if you owe your allegiance, but our Constitution doesn't say that," he said. "It says if you're born here, and you're not a diplomat's child, then you become a citizen, and that's the way its been for 100 years."
Carlos Galindo-Elvira, vice president of Valle del Sol, a Phoenix group that provides social services to community members and advocates for immigrants, said Pearce's interpretation of the amendment is an effort to "legitimize bullying babies."
He also questioned why lawmakers would focus on this issue rather than the country's economic woes and high unemployment rate. "All it does is split the country," he said.
Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, the founder of a national group of legislators critical of illegal immigration, said the 14th Amendment "greatly incentives foreign invaders to violate our border and our laws." He had a news conference Tuesday in Harrisburg, Pa., on the multistate endeavor.
The effort could run afoul of the language in the 14th Amendment and lead to a court battle over the constitutionality of the law. But Metcalfe said providing birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants is an "ongoing distortion and twisting" of the amendment.
Metcalfe's office said lawmakers in at least 12 other states besides Arizona and Pennsylvania said they were making their own announcements about working on the citizenship legislation. Those other states: Alabama, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.
Pearce was the main sponsor of a tough new Arizona law that would require police enforcing other laws to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the U.S. illegally. It was to go into effect this summer, but a judge put on hold key provisions pending the resolution of a legal challenge.
Pearce also was the chief sponsor of a 2007 state law targeting employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the 2010 law and who is championing the state's legal defense of it against a court challenge mounted by the U.S. Justice Department, was noncommittal when asked whether lawmakers should approve legislation on citizenship.
However, Brewer said she was "always concerned" by the possibility of involving the state in a court fight. "No one wants to be in court. No one wants to be fighting the federal government," she said.
PHOENIX – The state senator in Arizona who wrote the nation's toughest law against illegal immigrants said Tuesday he's collecting support across the country from legislators to challenge automatic U.S. citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.
Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce's target is the 14th Amendment, but it is unclear how the state lawmaker can or will influence a federal statue.
"This is a battle of epic proportions," Pearce said Tuesday during a news conference at the Arizona Capitol. "We've allowed the hijacking of the 14th Amendment."
Pearce declined to say how the legislation will differ from similar measures that have been introduced in each two-year congressional session since 2005. None of them made it out of committee.
He and another Arizona lawmaker did argue that wording in the amendment that guarantees citizenship to people born in the U.S. who are "subject to the jurisdiction" of this country does not apply to the children of illegal immigrants because such families don't owe sole allegiance to the U.S.
The efforts by Pearce and the other lawmakers come amid calls to change the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Supporters cite costs to taxpayers for services provided to illegal immigrants and their children.
Changing the Constitution is difficult.
It requires approval by two-thirds majorities in both chambers of Congress, an impossibility now because Democrats have the majority in both houses and most oppose such a measure. Even if Republicans gain power in November and legislation is passed, an amendment would still need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states.
Paul Bender, a constitutional law professor at Arizona State University, said if the lawmakers focus their argument on the "subject to jurisdiction" wording, they won't get very far because the founders only meant it to apply to the children of foreign diplomats born in the U.S.
"If the British ambassador and his wife have a child in the U.S., that child is not a citizen because he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. We cannot put him in jail, we cannot even give him a parking ticket," Bender said.
The 14th Amendment "could have easily have said you're a citizen if you owe your allegiance, but our Constitution doesn't say that," he said. "It says if you're born here, and you're not a diplomat's child, then you become a citizen, and that's the way its been for 100 years."
Carlos Galindo-Elvira, vice president of Valle del Sol, a Phoenix group that provides social services to community members and advocates for immigrants, said Pearce's interpretation of the amendment is an effort to "legitimize bullying babies."
He also questioned why lawmakers would focus on this issue rather than the country's economic woes and high unemployment rate. "All it does is split the country," he said.
Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, the founder of a national group of legislators critical of illegal immigration, said the 14th Amendment "greatly incentives foreign invaders to violate our border and our laws." He had a news conference Tuesday in Harrisburg, Pa., on the multistate endeavor.
The effort could run afoul of the language in the 14th Amendment and lead to a court battle over the constitutionality of the law. But Metcalfe said providing birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants is an "ongoing distortion and twisting" of the amendment.
Metcalfe's office said lawmakers in at least 12 other states besides Arizona and Pennsylvania said they were making their own announcements about working on the citizenship legislation. Those other states: Alabama, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.
Pearce was the main sponsor of a tough new Arizona law that would require police enforcing other laws to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the U.S. illegally. It was to go into effect this summer, but a judge put on hold key provisions pending the resolution of a legal challenge.
Pearce also was the chief sponsor of a 2007 state law targeting employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the 2010 law and who is championing the state's legal defense of it against a court challenge mounted by the U.S. Justice Department, was noncommittal when asked whether lawmakers should approve legislation on citizenship.
However, Brewer said she was "always concerned" by the possibility of involving the state in a court fight. "No one wants to be in court. No one wants to be fighting the federal government," she said.
*
Through love of having children, we are
going to take over."
---Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets
---Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets
SINCE THE
2004 ARTICLE BELOW WAS PUBLISHED, BILLIONS HAVE BEEN PAID OUT FOR ILLEGALS THAT
COME OVER OUR BORDER TO GIVE BIRTH TO ANCHORS AND COLLECT WELFARE! IN LOS
ANGELES COUNTY ALONE ILLEGALS COLLECT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE!!!
HOW TO
BREED AN EXPANDED MEXICAN OCCUPATION: ANCHOR BABIES = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE FOR
PREGNANT ILLEGALS CLIMBING OUR BORDERS
Anchor
Babies: Born in the USA -- The Abuse of the Fourteenth Amendment - Part I
Article
by Stephany Gabbard and Frosty Wooldridge
July
6, 2004
My commute to work exceeds fifty miles
but it gives me time to reflect. It is 1987 and I am an obstetrical nurse
working in the crowded San Fernando Valley of California. Tonight I drive to my
job in "Labor and Delivery," knowing the scenario before I arrive.
Eight other nurses will battle through the night in this very busy obstetrical
unit. Our patients are 99 percent pregnant illegal alien women who have broken
United States immigration law to birth an American citizen child.
This will be their
families' entry ticket into the United States. For them, no pesky visa
applications and no waiting in line for several years like so many millions
that enter this country through the front door. Pregnant Third World women have
discovered that the only thing they have to do is cross the U.S.--Mexico
border. The Fourteenth Amendment is their ticket.
It is now seventeen
years later and things have worsened. The babies I helped deliver are older
teenagers. When they turn 21, they will be eligible to bring their family
members from Mexico, Central America and South America, i.e., chain migration
on an ever-accelerating spinning wheel. Whole industries have now developed around
abusing the Fourteenth Amendment. Pregnant Korean tourists come to the U.S. on
travel visas to have their "anchor" babies. Coyotes dealing in human
traffic are paid $1,500.00 to $25,000.00 per person to shuttle pregnant illegal
aliens across our southern border. Our politicians and elites wink at this
blatant law breaking and do nothing. The colonization of our country continues
with the cooperation of our government. That means your senator and
representative aid this illegal baby invasion. None dare call it treason. Most
Americans mistakenly trust their politicians to do the right thing.
Congressional members from every state betray that trust daily.
The Fourteenth
Amendment: It's a simple document, a constitutional amendment drafted after the
Civil War to assure that newly emancipated black slaves would never be denied
citizenship by the States. The drafters had no idea that years later it would
be used to make a mockery of our immigration laws. Alan Wall, an American
journalist living in Mexico states, "An illegal alien can cross the
border, have a baby five minutes later, and that baby is automatically declared
a citizen of the USA automatically."
The illegal aliens
don't have to go through any legal doors. They are exempt from that. They are,
in fact, rewarded for disobeying U.S. laws by having their children granted
automatic citizenship. In addition, the happy family is entitled to welfare
benefits. And, illegal alien parents who have children born in the U.S. are
seldom deported. That's why their children are called "anchor babies"
- they anchor their families securely in the USA.
It doesn't have to be
this way. Most European countries have done away with birthright citizenship
because they experienced the same abuses we are seeing. The Irish Supreme Court
recently ruled that immigrant parents could be deported even if they have an
Irish child. "It was becoming common for 'single pregnant woman' to come
to Ireland from countries outside the 15-nation EU, most frequently from
Nigeria, to claim political asylum," states Shawn Pogatchnik, AP writer.
Ireland saw a wave of immigration abuse and promptly put a stop to it.
Recently, the Irish voted to end birthright citizenship. Britain and Australia
both changed their citizenship laws in the 1980's for the same reasons. If you
are born in Switzerland you will not automatically become a Swiss citizen. Why
should Americans allow our country to be invaded by people who do not honor
allegiance to our laws?
Allegiance is the key
word. Senator Jacob Howard, co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th
Amendment, stated in 1866, "Every Person born within the limits of the
United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law
and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course,
include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who
belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the
Government of the United States, but will include every other class of
persons."
The Fourteenth Amendment
states,"(A) Persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." However a
proviso limits foreigners who have babies in America. It couldn't be clearer,
children of foreigners, aliens or diplomats, who are subject to the
jurisdiction of their home country, are ineligible for citizenship. At the time
the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified we didn't have immigration laws. One
hundred and thirty eight years later we are paying for the misinterpretation of
it.
Congress has the
power to step in and correct this wrong, but don't hold your breath. There have
been several bills dealing with this issue and most have died in committee.
Except for a few brave individuals like Tom Tancredo of Colorado and Rep. Goode
of Virginia, there isn't enough chutzpah on Capital Hill to fill a thimble.
Where are the Thomas Jefferson's and Ben Franklin's when we need them? An
important case, Hamdi vs Rumsfeld was recently heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Yaser Hamdi was captured during the Afghanistan war fighting for the Taliban.
It was later learned that he had been born in Louisiana to Saudi nationals when
his father was employed as a chemical engineer on a work visa. The family
subsequently moved back to Saudi Arabia where Hamdi was raised. Hamdi sued the
U.S. government for holding him in a Navy stockade for two years. He demanded
full rights of U.S. citizenship since by accident he happened to be born here.
The U.S. government wanted Hamdi charged as a non-combatant and denied due
process. Rumsfeld representing the U.S. government didn't raise this issue
because he wanted to end birthright citizenship but other groups saw the
possibility to finally challenge this fatal flaw in our immigration law that is
wrecking havoc on our country.
One such group, Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement, submitted a 'friend of the court' or Amicus brief. They asked the Supreme Court to address the issue of whether Hamdi should be considered an American citizen at all, since at the time of his birth his parents were foreign nationals with no fealty to this nation.
The decision came down this week and just like the rest of the elite establishment in this country the U.S. Supreme Court ignored the issue of birthright citizenship except for a brief statement by Justices Scalia and Stevens stating Hamdi was a "presumed American citizen." So we live to fight another day. In the meantime the invasion/colonization of our country marches on. South Korean women can continue to visit www.birthinusa.com and plan their very pregnant United States vacations!
One such group, Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement, submitted a 'friend of the court' or Amicus brief. They asked the Supreme Court to address the issue of whether Hamdi should be considered an American citizen at all, since at the time of his birth his parents were foreign nationals with no fealty to this nation.
The decision came down this week and just like the rest of the elite establishment in this country the U.S. Supreme Court ignored the issue of birthright citizenship except for a brief statement by Justices Scalia and Stevens stating Hamdi was a "presumed American citizen." So we live to fight another day. In the meantime the invasion/colonization of our country marches on. South Korean women can continue to visit www.birthinusa.com and plan their very pregnant United States vacations!
*
Anchor Babies Grab One Quarter of
Welfare Dollars in LA Co
The anchor baby scam has proven lucrative for illegal aliens in Los Angeles County, at considerable cost to our own poor and downtrodden legal citizenry.
The numbers show that more than $50 million in CalWORKS benefits and food stamps for January went to children born in the United States whose parents are in the country without documentation. This represents approximately 23 percent of the total benefits under the state welfare and food stamp programs, Antonovich said.
"When you add this to $350 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for health care, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county taxpayers far exceeds $1 billion a year -- not including the millions of dollars for education," Antonovich said.
I love children and I'm all for compassion -- smart, teach-them-to-fish compassion. But when laws, the Constitution, and enforcement allow illegal aliens (the operative word here being "illegal") to insinuate themselves into our nation and bleed us of our precious financial resources, then laws, the Constitution and enforcement need to be changed.
*
"Remember
187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California."
---Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party
non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California."
---Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party
Anchor Baby Power
La Voz de Aztlan
has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as
US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to
transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are
over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year whereas George Putnam, a
radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de Aztlan believes
that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor Babies" born every
year.
The
video below depicts the many faces of the "Anchor Baby Generation".
The video includes a fascinating segment showing a group of elementary school
children in Santa Ana, California confronting the Minutemen vigilantes. The
video ends with a now famous statement by Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez of the
University of Texas at Austin.
Mexican Militants Tell white to "GET OUT"
http://creoleneworleans.typepad.com/creole_folks/2010/07/latino-amnesty-supporters-tell-whites-to-go-back-to-europe.html
Why isn’t the media splashing this video all over tv?
"This
is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This
is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to
Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California
through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via
President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
No comments:
Post a Comment