THE NEW YORK TIMES IS NOW 10% OWNED BY THE RICHEST MAN IN
THE WORLD, AND NO, THAT MAN IS NOT AMERICAN BILL GATES. IT IS MEXICAN CORPORATE
MONSTER CARLOS SLIM!
THE TIMES IS THEREFORE THE MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
YOU WON’T READ AN ARTICLE ABOUT MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE, LA
RAZA FASCISM, ILLEGALS VOTING, ILLEGALS DEMANDING POLITICIANS DEFEAT E-VERIFY
OR ILLEGAL USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS TO GET OUR JOBS!
IN LA RAZA MEXICAN MELTDOWN STATE OF MEXIFORNIA, THE COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS (source:
JUDICIAL WATCH)! THIS SAME COUNTY HAS A MEXICAN TAX-FREE UNDERGROUND ECONOMY
CALCULATED TO BE MORE THAN $2 BILLION PER YEAR.
NEARLY HALF OF ALL JOBS IN LOS ANGELES ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS
USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THE LA RAZA CONTROLLED STATE LEGISLATURE,
SUPPORTED AND SIGNED BY LA RAZA DEM, JERRY BROWN, SIGNED A LAW MAKING IT !!!
ILLEGAL !!! FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!
OBAMA HAS SUED THE STATE of ARIZONA TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY!
ARIZONA IS THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS SECOND MOST TRAFFICKED
ENTRANCE TO OUR NATION NEXT TO LOS ANGELES.
PHOENIX IS MEX GANG INFESTED AND SECOND LARGEST CENTER FOR
MEXICAN KIDNAPPING NEXT TO MEXICO CITY!
PHOENIX IS THE MEX CAR THEFT CAPITAL IN OUR BORDERS!
PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEXICAN HOME INVASION TERRORISM.
THE AMERICAN (LEGALS) PEOPLE OF PHOENIX ARE FORCED TO PAY
OUT MILLION IN WELFARE TO MEXICO’S BREEDERS THAT HOP THE BORDER PREGNANT FOR “FREE”
ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING, AND THEN 18 YEARS OF LA RAZA WELFARE!
Praising
Arizona
The state’s new immigration law is perfectly reasonable, but you wouldn’t know it from the New York Times.
30 April 2010
Supporters of
Arizona’s new law strengthening immigration enforcement in the state should
take heart from today’s New York Times editorial blasting it. “Stopping Arizona” contains
so many blatant falsehoods that a reader can be fully confident that the law as
actually written is a reasonable, lawful response to a pressing problem. Only
by distorting the law’s provisions can the Times and the law’s many
other critics make it out to be a racist assault on fundamental American
rights.
The law, SB 1070,
empowers local police officers to check the immigration status of individuals
whom they have encountered during a “lawful contact,” if an officer reasonably
suspects the person stopped of being in the country illegally, and if an
inquiry into the person’s status is “practicable.” The officer may not base his
suspicion of illegality “solely [on] race, color or national origin.” (Arizona
lawmakers recently amended the law to change the term “lawful
contact” to “lawful stop, detention or arrest” and deleted the word “solely”
from the phrase regarding race, color, and national origin. The governor is
expected to sign the amendments.) The law also requires aliens to carry their
immigration documents, mirroring an identical federal requirement. Failure to
comply with the federal law on carrying immigration papers becomes a state
misdemeanor under the Arizona law.
Good luck finding any
of these provisions in the Times’s editorial. Leave aside for the moment
the sweeping conclusions with which the Times begins its screed—such
gems as the charge that the law “turns all of the state’s Latinos, even legal
immigrants and citizens, into criminal suspects” and is an act of “racial
separation.” Instead, let’s see how the Times characterizes the specific
legislative language, which is presumably the basis for its indictment.
The paper alleges
that the “statute requires police officers to stop and question anyone who
looks like an illegal immigrant.” False. The law gives an officer the
discretion, when practicable, to determine someone’s immigration status only
after the officer has otherwise made a lawful stop, detention, or arrest. It
does not allow, much less require, fishing expeditions for illegal aliens. But
if, say, after having stopped someone for running a red light, an officer discovers
that the driver does not have a driver’s license, does not speak English, and
has no other government identification on him, the officer may, if practicable,
send an inquiry to his dispatcher to check the driver’s status with a federal
immigration clearinghouse.
The Times then
alleges that the law “empower[s] police officers to stop anyone they choose and
demand to see papers.” False again, for the reasons stated above. An officer
must have a lawful, independent basis for a stop; he can only ask to see papers
if he has “reasonable suspicion” to believe that the person is in the country
illegally. “Reasonable suspicion” is a legal concept of long-standing validity,
rooted in the Constitution’s prohibition of “unreasonable searches and
seizures.” It meaningfully constrains police activity; officers are trained in
its contours, which have evolved through common-law precedents, as a matter of
course. If the New York Times now thinks that the concept is
insufficient as a check on police power, it will have to persuade every court
and every law enforcement agency in the country to throw out the phrase—and the
Constitution with it—and come up with something that suits the Times’s
contempt for police power.
On broader legal
issues, the Times is just as misleading. The paper alleges that the
“Supreme Court has consistently ruled that states cannot make their own
immigration laws.” Actually, the law on preemption is almost impossibly murky.
As the Times later notes in its editorial, the Justice Department ruled
in 2002, after surveying the relevant Supreme Court and appellate precedents,
that “state and local police had ‘inherent authority’ to make immigration
arrests.” The paper does not like that conclusion, but it has not been revoked
as official legal advice. If states have inherent authority to make immigration
arrests, they can certainly do so under a state law that merely tracks the
federal law requiring that immigrants carry documentation.
The Times tips
its hand at the end of the editorial. It calls for the Obama administration to
end a program that trains local law enforcement officials in relevant aspects
of immigration law and that deputizes them to act as full-fledged immigration
agents. The so-called 287(g) program acts as a “force multiplier,” as the Times
points out, adding local resources to immigration law enforcement—just as
Arizona’s SB 1070 does. At heart, this force-multiplier effect is what the
hysteria over Arizona’s law is all about: SB 1070 ups the chances that an
illegal alien will actually be detected and—horror of horrors—deported. The
illegal-alien lobby, of which the New York Times is a charter member,
does not believe that U.S. immigration laws should be enforced. Usually
unwilling for political reasons to say so explicitly, the lobby comes up with
smoke screens—such as the Times’s demagogic charges about SB 1070 as an
act of “racial separation”—to divert attention from the underlying issue.
Playing the race card is the tactic of those unwilling to make arguments on the
merits. (The Times’s other contribution today to the prevailing de facto
amnesty for illegal aliens was to fail to disclose, in an article about a brutal 2007 schoolyard execution
in Newark, that the suspected leader was an illegal alien and member of the predominantly illegal-alien gang Mara
Salvatrucha.)
The Arizona law is
not about race; it’s not an attack on Latinos or legal immigrants. It’s about
one thing and one thing only: making immigration enforcement a reality. It is
time for a national debate: Do we or don’t we want to enforce the country’s
immigration laws? If the answer is yes, the Arizona law is a necessary and
lawful tool for doing so. If the answer is no, we should end the charade of
inadequate, half-hearted enforcement, enact an amnesty now, and remove future
penalties for immigration violations.
Heather Mac Donald is
a contributing editor of City
Journal, the John M. Olin Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and the
coauthor of The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan
Than Today’s.
*
AZ planning crackdown on tax fraud; new scrutiny may
affect migrants most
Posted: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:00 am
|
PHOENIX - Armed with a new computer
program, the Arizona Department of Revenue is cracking down on tax fraud this
year.
And although administrators say illegal
immigrants aren't the target, they're likely to be the majority of those caught
up in the effort.
People whose federal tax-identification
numbers doesn't match the information provided on their W-2 forms will not get
their refunds unless they can prove they are the ones who did the work.
The state and the Internal Revenue
Service encourage illegal immigrants to file income-tax forms and comply with
tax laws, which apply to individuals who earn money in the United States
regardless of their legal status.
In Arizona, where it's a crime to
knowingly hire an illegal immigrant, an immigrant will often work using either
a fake Social Security number or one that belongs to someone else. Their
employer puts that Social Security number on his or her W-2 form.
For tax filing, illegal immigrants - or
anyone in the United States legally who isn't eligible for a Social Security
number - must apply to the IRS for an Individual Tax Identification Number.
They then file taxes under that number.
The Arizona Department of Revenue's new
program will check all tax documents filed with tax ID numbers to make sure any
listed Social Security number and the tax ID number both belong to the employee
named.
If they don't, the state will send out
a letter asking the employee to prove he or she is the one who actually did the
work.
Anthony Forschino, assistant director
at the Department of Revenue, said about 60,000 Arizona residents filed taxes
last year using a tax ID number, resulting in about $6 million in refunds.
He said the state sampled a
"pretty good portion" of those returns and found that in 80 to 85
percent of them, the ID number did not match information provided on an
associated W-2.
This year, the new program will allow
the state to go through all the returns.
"We have a responsibility to try
and stop fraudulent returns," Forschino said. Forschino said officials
want to give refunds to those who earned them, regardless of legal status.
He said his department is still trying
to work out details of what sort of documentation an individual could show to
prove he or she is the one who did the work and paid the taxes.
*
For some, a struggle WHO THINKS ABOUT THE STRUGGLE OF THE AMERICANS?
Some illegal immigrants have used stolen Social Security
numbers to qualify for health programs -- a form of medical identity theft
increasingly on hospital radars. Many more scramble to pay for their medicine
and doctors visits in cash, a challenge in an economy where day-laborer work
has dried up.For some, a struggle WHO THINKS ABOUT THE STRUGGLE OF THE AMERICANS?
*
MEXICO BREEDS AN OCCUPATION AND HANDS US THE TAX BILLS FOR THEIR WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!
“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY
http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm
*
LA RAZA WELFARE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE:
THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County& JUDICIAL WATCH)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts
*
The Mexican Invasion................................................
Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html
*
Where To Go When Your Local Emergency Room Goes Bankrupt?"
During the past ten years 84 California hospitals have declared bankruptcy and closed their Emergency Rooms forever. Financially crippled by legislative and judicial mandates to treat illegal aliens have bankrupted hospitals! In 2010, in Los Angeles County alone, over 2 million illegal aliens recorded visits to county emergency rooms for both routine and emergency care. Per official figures, the cost is $1,000 dollars for every taxpayer in Los Angeles County.
http://justcommonsense-lostinamerica.blogspot.com/2011/03/where-to-go-when-your-local-emergency.html
April 29, 2010
Survivor
Recounts Horror of Attack in Newark Schoolyard
By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
NEWARK — She
lay face-down on the pavement, trying in terror to follow the orders of those
who had already robbed and molested her. “Somebody had their knee on my back,”
she said, when suddenly, “They pulled my hair up and was trying to chop my neck
off with a machete.”
“I guess the
knife was dull, because I just felt banging,” Natasha Aeriel told a jury here
Thursday morning. “But then I saw a bunch of blood.” Screaming for mercy, she
managed to push one attacker off her and rose to flee, when another shot her in
the head.
The sole
survivor of a notorious
attack in a Newark schoolyard that left her brother and two
friends dead almost three years ago, Ms. Aeriel told her story publicly for the
first time in State Superior Court in Essex County. She recounted the
horror of Aug. 4, 2007, in grim detail, in testimony that is at the heart of the
prosecution’s case in the first trial of one of the six men accused in the
slayings.
Despite
partial facial paralysis from the shooting that forces her to talk from one
side of her mouth, Ms. Aeriel, 22, spoke clearly in three and a half hours on
the witness stand, pausing just once to regain her composure. But her left hand
was in nervous motion much of the time, holding her chin or her cheek, playing
with the collar of her light brown jacket or running through her braids.
More than 20
relatives and friends of the victims sat in the gallery, underlining her words
with a few gasps, silent tears, even a little laughter and, at one point, a
smattering of applause, which brought a rebuke from Judge Michael L. Ravin.
She calmly
described her wounds, tugging at her gray blouse to reveal a machete scar on
her right shoulder, and pointing to the spot where the bullet struck behind her
left ear. She told of living in chronic pain and of multiple operations to
remove bullet fragments from her head, reattach her ear and partially
reconstruct her jaw.
But what she
could not do was say much about the defendant in this trial, Rodolfo Godinez,
26. She identified another of the accused as the one who shot her and said a
third hacked at her neck and shoulders. In the aftermath of the attack, she was
able to identify some of the defendants from pictures, but not Mr. Godinez,
whose lawyers have acknowledged that he was there but say he did not
participate in the attack.
Investigators
have described Mr. Godinez, a native of Nicaragua, as a recruiter for MS-13, or
Mara
Salvatrucha, a violent street gang composed mostly of Central Americans.
Mr. Godinez’s
lawyer, Roy Greenman, repeatedly raised questions about possible gaps or
inconsistencies in Ms. Aeriel’s memory of that night. Earlier in the
investigation, for example, she said there were six or seven people in the
group that attacked her and her friends, but on Thursday she testified that it
was definitely six.
Mr. Greenman
also had her recount how police detectives, after interviewing her in summer 2007,
did not talk to her again for almost a year — and so were unaware that she had
firmly identified a suspect she saw on television as the one who shot her.
Much of Ms.
Aeriel’s testimony could have been lifted from a horror movie script, starting
with an innocent gathering of four friends behind Mount Vernon School in the
Ivy Hill neighborhood, relaxing and listening to music on their car radio on a
hot summer night.
There was Ms.
Aeriel, then 19; her brother, Terrance Aeriel, 18; Ms. Aeriel’s best friend,
Iofemi Hightower, 20; and Dashon Harvey, 20, whom she remembered dancing to the
rap song “Wipe Me Down.” Three were students at Delaware State University, and Ms.
Hightower had planned to enroll there.
Mr. Godinez
and a friend were already in the schoolyard, drinking beer, and a while later
four more people — a mix of young men and teenage boys — joined them. At that
point, Mr. Aeriel, who had stepped away from his friends to make a phone call,
sensed that something was wrong. He sent his sister a text message saying that
they should leave, she testified, and walked swiftly back to his friends with a
serious expression.
They were
preparing to get back in the car, Ms. Aeriel said Thursday, when the other
group, at least two of them armed with guns, surrounded them and ordered them
to lie face-down on the ground and to empty their pockets.
“They was
checking our pockets, telling us if they find anything, we’re dead, don’t hold
nothing back,” she said. Under questioning by Mr. Greenman, she insisted that
each of the six was demanding their valuables and threatening them.
Mr. Harvey
had a new cellphone that he tried to hide, she said, but it began ringing. “I
was scared they were going to take my car,” she said. “I didn’t think they
would start going crazy the way they did.”
“They was
like, ‘Mama, you sexy,’ that kind of craziness,” Ms. Aeriel told the jury.
Someone tried to pull down Ms. Hightower’s pants, but she was wearing a belt.
Then someone yanked down Ms. Aeriel’s basketball shorts and touched her, she
said, and “all I could keep doing was saying, ‘Jesus, Jesus, Jesus,
Jesus.’ ”
Turning her
head slightly, Ms. Aeriel said, she caught the last glimpse she would ever get
of her brother and her friends. The attackers marched the other three to a
different spot, and then Ms. Aeriel felt the machete.
As she fought
off the attacker, “I was screaming, ‘Don’t do that, please don’t do that,
why?’ ” she recalled. As she stood up, she heard gunshots, and she kept
screaming. Moments later, she said, one of the group shot her.
Ms. Aeriel
testified that she had repeatedly tried to get to her feet, crawled a short
distance, and “then I’d fall in a pool of blood.” She finally blacked out.
Regaining
consciousness in an ambulance, she testified, “I kept saying, ‘Leave me here,
leave me here; it’s some kids behind that wall — go take care of them.’ ”
*
BOOK:
The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan Than Today's [Hardcover]
*
Product
Description
Heather Mac Donald describes how an epidemic of crime, gangs, and
illegitimacy is creating a new Hispanic underclass, and how the Mexican
government aids and abets illegal immigration to the United States and thwarts
state and local attempts to resist it. Steven Malanga shows how, despite much
argument to the contrary, Hispanic immigrants produce a net cost to the
American economy, not a net benefit, and he goes on to outline the kind of
immigration policy that would be both liberal and in America's interest. Victor
Davis Hanson writes about his own experience growing up in California's farm
country and watching the Hispanic immigrant influx transform his state for the
worse. The Immigration Solution proposes the same kind of policy in place in
other advanced nations, one that admits skilled and educated people on the
basis of what they can do for the country, not what the country can do for
them.
*
A READER’S REVIEW ON AMAZON:
In the introduction of this well argued
collection of essays, Myron Magnet points out how the illegal immigrant
advocates engage in an Orwellian misuse of language. They describe themselves
as "pro-immigration" and not defenders of law breaking. The Late
Milton Friedman warned, "that you can't have free immigration and a
welfare state." Rarely, if ever, in our nation's past did immigrants
receive welfare benefits. Illegitimacy rates were low and the newest residents
desperately attempted to improve their lot in life. Today's illegal immigrants,
especially within the Hispanic community, are often anti-intellectual and
hostile towards the very idea of assimilating into the wider American
community. A dangerous permanent underclass is turning many of our cities and
towns into dystopian hell holes. Many well meaning people are so intimidated by
the false charge of racism and "nativism" that they prefer to pretend
the problem really doesn't exist. The intellectual virus of political
correctness regretfully dominates the discussion. Rational and dispassionate
dialogue is often near impossible. Sadly, many Hispanic citizens are also guilt
tripped into believing they owe something to these illegal residents. The
situation is only getting worse. Time may not be on our side. We obviously are
not going to shoot and mistreat the illegals. It is best that we instead find
realistic solutions to resolve the crisis. This book offers some excellent
recommendations.
The MSM hides the brutal truth from the American people. Few realize that the Mexican government, for instance, hypocritically encourages its own citizens to enter our country illegally---while it treats its own illegal immigrants like subhuman creatures. This is a relatively short book of only 183 pages and an index. It is perhaps the best book available for those who desire to acquire a better understanding of this issue in a relatively short period of time. You need to especially read The Immigration Solution before voting in November.
The MSM hides the brutal truth from the American people. Few realize that the Mexican government, for instance, hypocritically encourages its own citizens to enter our country illegally---while it treats its own illegal immigrants like subhuman creatures. This is a relatively short book of only 183 pages and an index. It is perhaps the best book available for those who desire to acquire a better understanding of this issue in a relatively short period of time. You need to especially read The Immigration Solution before voting in November.
*
Review"...A call to arms combined with an outline for a sensible immigration policy." -- Thomas Tancredo, United States Congressman from Colorado
*
"Demolishes open-borders myths and provides a clear, sane path toward an immigration plan that benefits America..." -- Michelle Malkin, author of Invasion
*
"Even if you disagree with their preferred policy changes, their suggestions are serious, provocative, and worthy of careful thought..." -- Dr. George Borjas, Robert W. Scrivner Professor of Economics and Social Policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and the author of Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy
"Even if you disagree with their preferred policy changes, their suggestions are serious, provocative, and worthy of careful thought..." -- Dr. George Borjas, Robert W. Scrivner Professor of Economics and Social Policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and the author of Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy
*
"In this book, the writers from City Journal again show why that magazine is so indispensable. Having helped change conventional wisdom on the urban problems of crime and welfare, they have now taken a hard look at an issue even more suffused with sentimentality and cliché. The Immigration Solution is essential reading for anyone seeking to develop an informed opinion on this vital national issue." -- Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies
"In this book, the writers from City Journal again show why that magazine is so indispensable. Having helped change conventional wisdom on the urban problems of crime and welfare, they have now taken a hard look at an issue even more suffused with sentimentality and cliché. The Immigration Solution is essential reading for anyone seeking to develop an informed opinion on this vital national issue." -- Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies
*
"The Immigration Solution demolishes open-borders myths and provides a clear, sane path toward an immigration plan that benefits America and adheres to the rule of law. Heather Mac Donald, Victor Davis Hanson, and Steven Malanga battle muddled amnesty advocates with impeccable logic, facts, and principle. This book is not just a must-read. It's a must-do. -- Michelle Malkin, author of Invasion
"The Immigration Solution demolishes open-borders myths and provides a clear, sane path toward an immigration plan that benefits America and adheres to the rule of law. Heather Mac Donald, Victor Davis Hanson, and Steven Malanga battle muddled amnesty advocates with impeccable logic, facts, and principle. This book is not just a must-read. It's a must-do. -- Michelle Malkin, author of Invasion
*
"The Immigration Solution is a cogent analysis of our illegal immigration crisis and the public policy choices facing America. This book is a critically important read for our elected officials and the citizens they should be representing." -- Lou Dobbs
"The Immigration Solution is a cogent analysis of our illegal immigration crisis and the public policy choices facing America. This book is a critically important read for our elected officials and the citizens they should be representing." -- Lou Dobbs
*
"The Immigration Solution is essential reading for anyone seeking to develop an informed opinion on this vital national issue." -- Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies
"The Immigration Solution is essential reading for anyone seeking to develop an informed opinion on this vital national issue." -- Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies
*
"The Immigration Solution is not just another book about the catastrophe cause by millions of illegal aliens flooding our country; it is a call to arms combined with an outline for a sensible immigration policy. If every member of Congress would read this book, we might be able to beginning the process of securing our borders and reducing the number of illegal immigrants within them." -- Thomas Tancredo, United States Congressman from Colorado
"The Immigration Solution is not just another book about the catastrophe cause by millions of illegal aliens flooding our country; it is a call to arms combined with an outline for a sensible immigration policy. If every member of Congress would read this book, we might be able to beginning the process of securing our borders and reducing the number of illegal immigrants within them." -- Thomas Tancredo, United States Congressman from Colorado
*
"The Immigration Solution" is an excellent new book that discusses illegal immigration without the political rhetoric, spin, demagoguery, and unsubstantiated claims that have become all too common in the media and among politicians.
"The Immigration Solution" is an excellent new book that discusses illegal immigration without the political rhetoric, spin, demagoguery, and unsubstantiated claims that have become all too common in the media and among politicians.
*
It was written by three scholars at leading think tanks -- Heather Mac Donald and Steve Malanga of the Manhattan Institute and Victor Davis Hanson of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. Unlike many other scholars, they know how to write so that the general public can understand what they are saying."--- -- Thomas Sowell, Real Clear Politics
*
"The divisive debate over immigration is going to continue for some time to come. MacDonald, Malanga, and Hanson lucidly present their concerns over the current direction of immigration policy and offer more than a few suggestions for change. Even if you disagree with their preferred policy changes, their suggestions are serious, provocative, and worthy of careful thought-and, regardless of your ideological background, you might actually find yourself nodding more than a few times as you read through the book." -- Dr. George Borjas, Robert W. Scrivner Professor of Economics and Social Policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and the author of Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy
"A comprehensive and enjoyable history of the machinations behind and history of DreamWorks and the personalities involved. ... A valuable resource to discover some of the inner workings of the DreamWorks story." --Thomas Jackson, American Renaissance, August 2008
*
·
Hardcover: 224 pages
·
Publisher: Ivan R Dee (November 2,
2007)
·
Language: English
·
ISBN-10: 1566637600
·
ISBN-13: 978-1566637602
*
No comments:
Post a Comment