JOBS: NO LEGAL NEED APPLY! Joe Legal vs Jose Illegal & LA RAZA SUPREMACY - WHO GETS THE JOBS?

WASHINGTON’S WAR ON LIVING WAGES STARTS AT OUR BORDERS. OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY, NON-ENFORCEMENT HAS PUT MILLIONS OF “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS!

HOW “CHEAP” IS THAT LABOR?

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE HALF THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS. THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS! IT ALSO HAS A TAX-FREE MEXICAN ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE MORE THAN $2 BILLION PER YEAR!

LA RAZA DEM GOV JERRY BROWN JUST SIGNED A LAW PUSHED BY THE LA RAZA FACTION OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IN SACRAMENTO, MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!

*

“Moreover, Professor Addy assumes that employers will not make the adjustments necessary to convert to a legal workforce by offering better wages, conditions, and benefits. Many of the jobs done by illegal aliens only exist because employers have had access to low-wage, illegal labor. Jobs necessary to the economy will remain, will offer better pay to legal workers, and will boost tax payments as well as reducing costs of providing for unemployed and /or impoverished legal residents of the state.”

Cost Study Attempts To Undermine AL Immigration Enforcement Law

Last week, the University of Alabama Economist Samuel Addy released a study on the state’s immigration enforcement law, HB 56, concluding that the law’s costs are greater than its benefits. (Addy Report, January 2012) Specifically, Mr. Addy finds that HB 56 will cause illegal aliens to leave Alabama, leading a “reduction in aggregate demand.” (Addy Report, p.1) The reduction in demand, Addy says, will cause: (1) a loss of jobs in the state, (2) a reduction in Alabama’s gross domestic product, (3) a reduction in state income and sales taxes, and (4) a reduction in local sales taxes.

Mr. Addy reaches these conclusions by setting forth what he calls a “cost-benefit analysis” of the law. Addy sets forth several “potential economic benefits” of HB 56 to the state. These include: (1) savings of public benefits provided to illegal aliens, (2) improved public safety, (3) more business, employment, and education opportunities for legal residents, and (4) restoring the integrity of state programs and services. (Addy Report, p.3) Remarkably, however, Addy dismisses these benefits as minimal and fails to attributes any dollar amount to them. For example, he merely describes savings from public benefits given to illegal aliens, including public education, as “likely to be small and decline over time.” (Addy Report, p. 4) FAIR estimates that the annual cost of educating children of illegal aliens alone is $187 million. (FAIR National Cost Study, p. 48 (2010))

Unlike his analysis of the law’s benefits, Mr. Addy is more explicit about what he perceives to be the costs of HB 56. According to Addy, these include: (1) the costs of implementation, enforcement, and litigation, (2) Increased costs for citizens, legal residents and businesses, (3) Damage to the state’s reputation reducing economic development opportunities, and (4) Economic impact of reduced aggregate demand. (Addy Report, p. 5) Addy spends the bulk of his cost analysis focusing on what he believes will be reduced economic demand resulting from illegal aliens leaving the state. This reduced demand, Addy concludes, will cause the state to lose anywhere from $2.3 to $10.8 billion in economic activity—an “estimate” in which the highest figure is nearly five times the lowest figure. (Addy Report, p. 9)

In addition providing a lopsided cost-benefit analysis, Professor Addy’s principle argument is that a reduced population necessarily means reduced economic activity and therefore loss. This ignores the fact that a small state may have a healthier economy and tax revenue per capita than a much larger state. (Gross State Product) GSP only measures the sum total of economic activity in Alabama. It is not an indicator of economic prosperity or income levels, or a measure of the standard of living in the state. Quality of jobs is more important than quantity in determining the economic health. If that were not true, a state would be as willing to host sweatshops as high tech manufacturing plants, which Professor Addy is implying Alabama should do.

Moreover, Professor Addy assumes that employers will not make the adjustments necessary to convert to a legal workforce by offering better wages, conditions, and benefits. Many of the jobs done by illegal aliens only exist because employers have had access to low-wage, illegal labor. Jobs necessary to the economy will remain, will offer better pay to legal workers, and will boost tax payments as well as reducing costs of providing for unemployed and /or impoverished legal residents of the state.

Ironically, the most reasonable conclusion from Professor Addy’s study is that HB 56 works. His analysis of the impact of HB 56 is predicated entirely on the fact that illegal aliens will leave Alabama. Thus, Professor Addy has acknowledges that increased enforcement will deter illegal immigration.

*

THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!

“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”

*

MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO LA RAZA – THE MEXICAN FASCIST POLITICAL PARTY. THESE FIGURES ARE DATED. CNN CALCULATES THAT WAGES ARE DEPRESSED $300 - $400 BILLION PER YEAR!

“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor

*

JOE LEGAL vs LA RAZA “THE RACE” JOSE ILLEGAL.

Illegals make more than US workers

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Ready? Now pay attention...
Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year.. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631 .00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $280.00 per family member/ month federal CASH AID for four family members . Jose Illegal has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.
Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $ 43,200.00. stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.."actually Jose illegal doesn't pay for most utilities in many states as he gets county assistance to pay the bills and his late fees"
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work. "and pays a higher tax rate if he earns above a certain amount"
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

…. AND THEN JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILL TO SUPPORT ALL THIS “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR, AND THE CRIME TIDAL WAVE THAT COMES WITH THE OCCUPATION!

*

“THE AMNESTY ALONE WILL BE THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE WELFARE SYSTEM IN THE LAST 25 YEARS” Heritage Foundation

"The amnesty alone will be the largest expansion of the welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector, a senior analyst at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary Committee field hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to hit their peak around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very narrow time horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If even a small fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on Medicaid, you're looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year." (SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS IN CALIFORNIA ALONE ARE NOT UP TO $20 BILLION PER YEAR. WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN NEVADA, NOW 25% ILLEGAL, IS SOARING!)

*

FAIRUS.org

U.S. Taxpayers Spend $113 Billion Annually on Illegal Aliens

America has never been able to afford the costs of illegal immigration. With rising unemployment and skyrocketing deficits, federal and state lawmakers are now facing the results of failed policies. A new, groundbreaking report from FAIR, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, takes a comprehensive look at the estimated fiscal costs resulting from federal, state and local expenditures on illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children. Expanding upon the series of state studies done in the past, FAIR has estimated the annual cost of illegal immigration to be $113 billion, with much of the cost — $84.2 billon — coming at the state and local level.

*

JUDICIAL WATCH

SANCTUARY COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS

County Spends $600 Mil On Welfare For Illegal Immigrants

Last Updated: Thu, 03/11/2010 - 3:14pm

For the second consecutive year taxpayers in a single U.S. county will dish out more than half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants.  

Los Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a dire financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens. In January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants collected more than $50 million in welfare benefits. At that rate the cash-strapped county will pay around $600 million this year to provide illegal aliens’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare perks.

The exorbitant figure, revealed this week by a county supervisor, doesn’t even include the enormous cost of educating, medically treating or incarcerating illegal aliens in the sprawling county of about 10 million residents. Los Angeles County annually spends more than $1 billion for those combined services, including $500 million for healthcare and $350 million for public safety. 

About a quarter of the county’s welfare and food stamp issuances go to parents who reside in the United States illegally and collect benefits for their anchor babies, according to the figures from the county’s Department of Social Services. In 2009 the tab ran $570 million and this year’s figure is expected to increase by several million dollars. 

Illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who revealed the information has said. The former fifth-grade history teacher has repeatedly come under fire from his liberal counterparts for publicizing statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has had on the region. Antonovich, who has served on the board for nearly three decades, represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the size of Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.

His district is simply a snippet of a larger crisis. Nationwide, Americans pay around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare benefits that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in public schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC) for low-income women and their children. Tens of billions more are spent on other social services, medical care, public education and legal costs such as incarceration and public defenders. 

*

Anchor Babies Grab One Quarter of Welfare Dollars in LA Co

The anchor baby scam has proven lucrative for illegal aliens in Los Angeles County, at considerable cost to our own poor and downtrodden legal citizenry.

The numbers show that more than $50 million in CalWORKS benefits and food stamps for January went to children born in the United States whose parents are in the country without documentation. This represents approximately 23 percent of the total benefits under the state welfare and food stamp programs, Antonovich said.

"When you add this to $350 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for health care, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county taxpayers far exceeds $1 billion a year -- not including the millions of dollars for education," Antonovich said.

I love children and I'm all for compassion -- smart, teach-them-to-fish compassion. But when laws, the Constitution, and enforcement allow illegal aliens (the operative word here being "illegal") to insinuate themselves into our nation and bleed us of our precious financial resources, then laws, the Constitution and enforcement need to be changed.