MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
From the above blog,
email articles to those concerned about Obama’s endless push for amnesty.
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
THE LOOTING IS GOOD IN RE-CONQUERED MEX TERRITORIES!
MEXICANS SAY AMNESTY WILL INCREASE INVASION –
*
Despite Arizona Law, Illegals Vow to Keep Coming
DESPITE ARIZONA LAW, ILLEGALS VOW to KEEP COMING
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 5:33 am
by Associated Press
Illegal migrants targeted by a tough new Arizona law dismiss
it as just another obstacle that pales in comparison to the extortion, arrests
and kidnappings they already risk to reach U.S. soil.
NOGALES, Mexico — The line of Mexicans waiting to go
shopping in Arizona snakes twice around the sun-drenched plaza, even as
politicians nearby slap stickers on cars calling for a boycott of the U.S.
state.
And the illegal migrants targeted by a tough new Arizona law
dismiss it as just another obstacle that pales in comparison to the extortion,
arrests and kidnappings they already risk to reach U.S. soil. They vow to keep
on coming.
Topics: Illegal Immigration, Arizona SB 1070,
Resentment has erupted throughout Mexico over the
immigration law in Arizona that is considered racist here. But crossing back
and forth between the countries is so intrinsic to their lives that many
Mexicans find it hard to give it up despite calls by immigration activists for
a boycott of Arizona.
"Border cities depend on each other and it has been
that way for many years," said Maria Romero, a nurse from Nogales, which
lies across from the Arizona town of the same name. "It seems they don't
understand that on the other side and are always looking for ways to make
things more difficult."
There are few signs so far that the bill has deterred
Mexicans from crossing into Arizona — legally or not. The wait to drive across
the border is more than two hours.
The legislation signed by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer last week
requires local and state police who stop people for another reason to question
them about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the
country illegally. Suspects would be detained if they are not carrying proper
documents.
Supporters say the law is necessary because the federal
government has failed to secure the border and because of rising anxiety over
crime.
The measure has provoked huge protests in the United States
by immigrant advocates who say it will encourage racial profiling. But the
outcry south of the border has been subdued as Mexicans wait for the law to
take effect and see how it will be implemented.
Some Mexican officials even warn that an economic boycott of
Arizona could backfire if companies there lay off Mexican workers who would
then no longer be able to send remittances back home.
For many of the tens of thousands of Mexicans who legally
visit Arizona every day to shop for bargains or visit relatives, the cost of
not going is too high — despite their dislike of the law.
In Nogales, Mexico, Romero lined up with hundreds of others
at the border crossing, inching forward around a plaza and past vendors hawking
jewelry and cheap souvenirs. She needed to buy a tuxedo for her 5-year-old son
to wear to his kindergarten graduation and hoped to find it for a third of what
it would cost in Mexico.
"No one should cross, but we go because we want to
save," Romero said.
Life in the two cities is tightly interwoven despite the
corrugated steel wall that runs along the hillsides, separating a string of
fast-food restaurants and cheap clothing stores on the U.S. side from the dusty
streets and nightclubs to the south.
The Mexican city, founded in the 19th century along a
north-south railway line built to promote trade between the two countries, has
become the largest point of entry for the estimated 65,000 Mexicans who visit
Arizona every day, mostly for the big shopping malls.
At least 23,400 jobs in Arizona depend on the more than
$7.35 million that Mexican visitors spend every day in stores, restaurants,
hotels and other businesses, according to a University of Arizona study
sponsored by the state's Office of Tourism.
In Santa Cruz county — where Arizona's Nogales is located —
Mexican visitors account for 50 percent of taxable sales, the research found.
Mexicans angry about the immigration law want to deprive
Arizona of that income.
The Institute for Mexicans Abroad, an autonomous government
agency that supports Mexicans living and working in the United States, called
for boycotts of Tempe, Arizona-based US Airways, the Arizona Diamondbacks and
the Phoenix Suns until those organizations denounce the law.
Mexican legislators of all political stripes have called on
the government of President Felipe Calderon to consider breaking commercial
ties with Arizona. The government has issued a travel alert for the state,
warning that migrants face an adverse political environment there.
A group of politicians handed out stickers at the Nogales
border crossing over the weekend, urging Mexicans not to buy Arizona products.
"Made in Arizona SB 1070. I don't buy from those who
discriminate," the stickers read, in reference to the bill.
The movement has yet to take off.
Nogales Mayor Jose Angel Hernandez said many Arizona shops,
business and factories employ Mexicans who send money back to relatives south
of the border.
"I have family in Nogales, Arizona, and I have a lot of
friends who live and work there, and they help Nogales, Sonora," Hernandez
said in an interview with The Associated Press. "That's why I worry that
if the boycott is not directed correctly, it could harm our Mexican brothers
who are there and are helping us."
At a shelter in Nogales, meanwhile, deported migrants
discussed how soon they could get back across the border.
"I'll return to Arizona because I know a lot of people
there, and I'll go where people will give me work, law or no law," said
Nicasio Benitez, who worked in landscaping there until he was deported last
week after being caught in a car with a cracked windshield.
He said he would visit family in the Gulf coast state of
Veracruz before heading back to the border in a month.
"You live under a lot of pressure in Arizona. You have
a hard time finding a place to rent, being able to drive," said Benitez, a
father of three teenagers. "But what you make in the U.S. in one day, you
make it in Mexico in one week."
"Life there is awful, but I don't go to the U.S.
because I like living there," he added. "I go because I like
dollars."
*
INVASION
PROSPECTS IN 2009
Judicial Watch
Mexicans Say Amnesty Will Boost Illegal
Immigration
last
Updated: Wed, 10/14/2009 - 3:02pm
If
President Obama keeps his promise of giving the nation’s 12
million illegal aliens amnesty it will encourage more Mexicans to enter the
United States, according to residents of the struggling Latin American country
who are undoubtedly rooting for the commander-in-chief’s plan.
The
majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. are from Mexico therefore the
president’s reprieve project will greatly affect that nation. Two-thirds of
Mexicans say they know someone living in the United States and around one-third
have an immediate member of their household or close relative living in the
U.S.
A
majority of those residing south of the border say legalizing their
undocumented countrymen will inspire more Mexicans to head north, according to
a recent survey conducted by an internationally known polling and market research company. A vast majority of Mexicans
with a relative in the United States said a legalization program would make
people they know more likely to go to America illegally.
The
results of the survey were made public this week by a research organization dedicated to studying the
economic, social, fiscal and demographic impacts of immigration in the U.S. It
reveals that nearly one-third of Mexican residents (nearly 40 million people)
would like to live in the U.S. and if there was an amnesty a large number would
come illegally with the hope of qualifying for a future exoneration.
An
amnesty, therefore, would stimulate more illegal immigration which is the last
thing this country needs. Furthermore, rewarding those who have violated our
nation’s laws with coveted U.S. residency and possibly citizenship demeans the
system, especially for those who follow the appropriate steps to come
lawfully.
It’s
bad enough that U.S. taxpayers annually dish out billions of dollars to
educate, medically treat and incarcerate illegal aliens who are, in many cases,
depleting local governments. Los Angeles County alone spends more than $1 billion a
year,
including $48 million a month in welfare costs, to provide services for illegal
aliens. The crisis is hardly limited to border states, which have traditionally
been the most impacted. Georgia’s skyrocketing illegal population costs
taxpayers nearly $2 billion a year.
*
REALITY CHECK:
THE INVASION IS BY INVITATION!
WHEN IN THE HISTORY OF CIVILIZATION
HAS ANY NATION INVITED 38 MILLION INVADERS OVER THEIR BORDERS? MEXICANS LOATH
THIS NATION, OUR LAWS, ORDINANCES, CULTURE, FLAG, AND LANGUAGE…. And still they
come!
“As one member of the U.S. Border Patrol (search) told me,
“They believe that they are only responding to an invitation.”
Thursday
, February 19, 2004
By Matt Hayes
On
Jan. 27, the Copley News Service reported that shortly after President Bush
announced his plans to amnesty millions of illegal aliens in the U.S.,
more than half of the Mexicans trying to sneak into the U.S. through San
Ysidro (search) told
authorities they were doing so to position themselves for the amnesty.
As one member of the U.S. Border Patrol (search) told me,
“They believe that they are only responding to an invitation.”
The
percentage suggested by Copley probably does not come close to the actual
number of people who are running for the American border as word of Bush’s
immigration plan (search) spreads
through Mexico -- and indeed throughout the world. Mexico, it seems, is now
regarded the world over as the doorway to the United States.
In
the last several weeks, a staggering 90 percent of all illegal aliens
intercepted in one sector in southern Texas claim they’ve come for the
amnesty.
Officers
of the Border Patrol have now been directed to ask a set of questions of the
illegal aliens they apprehend running across the border. One of those
questions is: Is the person attempting to illegally enter
the U.S. in response to the Bush amnesty proposal? To make arrests,
Border Patrol officers often must dodge rocks being thrown at
them by aliens as they cross. They then are told by all but 10 percent
of the illegals they apprehend that it is the Bush amnesty (search) they've
come for.
“The
agents were soon told to stop collecting this information, presumably because
it appeared as if the proposal was acting as a lure,” says my source within the
Border Patrol.
Word
of the 2000-mile wide open door between Mexico and the U.S. has spread far
beyond Mexico. It is not just Mexicans who are flooding into our
border states anymore. Along with the Nicaraguans, Brazilians,
Venezuelans, Ecuadorians, and Chileans, agents of the Border Patrol now
encounter Chinese, Pakistanis, and Indians. Nationals of countries other
than Mexico are known, in Border Patrol parlance, as “OTMs.” (search) Because
they cannot easily be returned to their home country (whereas a Mexican
national might be driven right back across the border), OTMs are permitted to
enter the U.S. and given a Notice to Appear, which is a piece of paper
demanding their appearance before an Immigration Judge.
“I’m
an OTM and I want my NTA,” some have been known to declare to the Border
Patrol. Rules require that most be given their NTA, upon which the OTM
departs forever for some unknown location in America.
“A
lot of OTMs want to be caught so they can get their "papers," which
makes them legal enough to get past our checkpoint without having to ride in
the back of an 18-wheeler or crammed into the trunk of a car,” says one agent.
This
is what the Bush amnesty proposal has caused to happen at our border with
Mexico. Foreign nationals walk nearly unimpeded into our country -- fully
aware of ways in which our immigration laws can be used to their advantage
and even the nomenclature of immigration law enforcement-- and demand that our
federal officers take a certain action that gives them the greatest likelihood
of disappearing within the U.S.
Like
a loss-making business that is kept alive by its corporate parent so it can be
used as a tax write-off, the Border Patrol remains deliberately undermanned and
hogtied while the administration tries to keep up the appearance that the
borders of the United States actually mean something.
At
a Democratic rally in Tennessee, Al Gore dumbfounded observers when, in
criticizing President Bush's invasion of Iraq, he baroquely claimed the
president had "betrayed his country." Right now, thousands of
registered Republicans -- particularly those in border states -- are
experiencing a tangible sense of betrayal. Some things are sacrosanct to
the modern Republican, and along with such values as a strong national defense
and limited government, one is a secure national border. That
disappeared with President Bush’s amnesty proposal, just as if he had announced
that the GOP is no longer interested in reducing taxes.
I
doubt that most principled Republicans will forget it.
*
FAIRUS.org
The
Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department.
By
Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The
setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a
“Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing.
Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration
and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a
mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United
States.
Arguing
the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she
described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the
administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to
serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and
workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging
that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to
effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of
previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to
reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For
starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where
it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight,
she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country
as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its
approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the
interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed
worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If
Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP
speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he
wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data
to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of
border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for
the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the
same 894 miles.
The
administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is
just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers
shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that
administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between
2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for
criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments,
and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While
the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President
Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite
enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The
administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them
with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the
payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no
adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the
illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set
of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers
willing to accept substandard wages.
In
Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under
“effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of
immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard
to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything,
the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of
future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re
printed on.
As
Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy,
they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that
they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all
but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and
workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed
or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As
Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually
accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to
enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this
administration is “Mission Aborted.”
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
No comments:
Post a Comment