There is an effort to pass Amnesty for illegal aliens underway in the compromised media and the US Senate today. Currently,we eagerly await the US Supreme Court ruling on Arizona's SB 1070 which could give us a brief opportunity to go on offense against illegal immigration in America!
This email is an effort to warn you and get you organized quickly. We have beaten them before and ALIPAC can beat them again, if enough of you rise to the occasion.
The fate of Amnesty for illegal aliens will be decided in this year's elections. There will be legislation that US Senator Marco Rubio, a man that gutted 31 of our illegal immigration fighting bills in the Florida legislature, plans to file soon.
As you can see in these articles, Marco Rubio plans to have his 'Republican Version' of the Dream Act Amnesty in place before college students return to school in Fall 2012! He is also traipsing about with Mitt Romney in Florida today!
Article (Please read, understand, utilize, and circulate)
Rubio Wants GOP DREAM Act AMNESTY for illegals in Place in Time for Fall College Semester
http://www.alipac.us/content/rubio-w...-semester-409/
Dream Act Amnesty Supporter Marco Rubio hits the trail with Mitt Romney
http://www.alipac.us/content/marco-r...tt-romney-414/
TAKE ACTION NOW
Step 1: Call this new Amnesty supporting traitor Senator Marco Rubio and tell him what you think of his illegal alien Amnesty plans.
Remember that all calls are monitored and while you should be firm, don't go over the top or Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security will put you in a bag and hold you up for the nation to see.
Call Rubio's offices with your own version of our sample messages.
"I'm calling to tell Senator Rubio that I am one of the vast majority of Americans who oppose his illegal alien Dream Act Amnesty plans."
or
"I'm calling/writing to tell Senator Rubio that I oppose his illegal alien Amnesty plans and that I will work to make sure that his political career is ended. Accurate polls show that Americans oppose Dream Act Amnesty concepts 2 to 1 (Rasmussen Polling Oct 2007) and Senator Rubio has made a big career mistake trying to become the next John McCain and Lindsay Graham with illegal immigration issues. Dream Act Amnesty for illegal aliens will only encourage more illegal aliens and the courts will eventually allow Marco Rubio's illegal aliens voting rights, which will steal political power from millions of innocent Americans. Rubio's Dream Act Amnesty bill will cost many Americans their votes, jobs, taxpayer resources, and very lives. We need immigration enforcement not Amnesty!"
LIGHT UP THOSE PHONE LINES NOW USING THESE NUMBERS! Remember, calls are the most effective tool you have.
Senator Marco Rubio
DC Office
317 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington DC, 20510
Phone: 202-224-3041
Senator Marco Rubio
201 South Orange Avenue
Suite 350
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: (407) 254-2573
toll free in Florida 1-866-630-7106
*
MAYBE
AMERICANS THAT VOTE DEMOCRAT SHOULD WAKE UP TO WHAT THE DEM PARTY HAS DONE FOR
ALL THAT STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR!
THEY’RE
TURNING THIS NATION INTO A MEXICAN COLONY FOR LOOTING!
CALIFORNIA
UNDER MEX OCCUPATION:
1.
PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS AGAINST $28
BILLION PER YEAR IN DEFICITS.
2.
ON TOP OF THIS COUNTIES PUT OUT EVEN MORE. MEX-INFESTED LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
WHERE NO LEGAL CAN GET A JOB, PAYS OUT $600 MILLION, PRIMARILY FOR ANCHOR BABY
BIRTHERS = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE.
3.
OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CITY of L.A., 176 ARE MEXICANS, AND
MOST OF THE REST ARE RUSSIANS.
4.
THE CA ATTORNEY GENERAL (LA RAZA DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS) DECLARES THAT NEARLY !!!
HALF !!! OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS!
5.
THE LA RAZA FACTION OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE JUST PASSED ANOTHER OCCUPATION
LAW. IT IS NOW ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY! VIVA LA RAZA AGAIN! THIS,
AFTER THEY PASSED A LAW HANDING SPECIAL HIGHER EDUCATION DISCOUNTS TO ILLEGALS
AS TUITION RATES FOR LEGALS HAS SOARED 30%!
"Any
reversal on these positions would destroy his credibility, alienate
conservative American voters who outnumber Latino voters, and exert the same
pressures on Mitt Romney that destroyed John McCain and Rick Perry's campaigns,"
said William Gheen, the head of the anti-illegal immigration group ALIPAC.
"Not only would a Romney shift on immigration hurt him among Americans
concerned about illegal immigration but it would signal that he cannot be
trusted on any issue or topic whatsoever."
Border hawks warn Mitt Romney not to soften
immigration stance
By
Cameron Joseph - 04/22/12 07:00 AM ET
Immigration hawks are
warning Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, not to moderate the
hard-line stances on border security and deportation that he took during the
GOP primary.
Conservatives who
focus on an anti-illegal immigration message are worried that Romney will move
toward the political center in the general election election campaign after he
suggested the GOP develop a “Republican DREAM Act.”
"Any
reversal on these positions would destroy his credibility, alienate
conservative American voters who outnumber Latino voters, and exert the same
pressures on Mitt Romney that destroyed John McCain and Rick Perry's
campaigns," said William Gheen, the head of the anti-illegal immigration
group ALIPAC. "Not only would a Romney shift on immigration hurt him among
Americans concerned about illegal immigration but it would signal that he
cannot be trusted on any issue or topic whatsoever."
Romney, took a hard
line on immigration during the GOP primary and said he would veto the “DREAM
Act,” which in its current incarnation would allow some illegal immigrants a
path to citizenship. But he said at a private fundraiser last weekend that his
campaign was “doomed” if he didn’t improve his standing with Hispanic voters.
Romney did not detail policy specifics of a “Republican DREAM Act” and avoided discussing those comments
when asked about them on Friday in Arizona.
Former Rep. Tom
Tancredo (R-Colo.), a longtime anti-immigration activist, said he was
unsurprised that Romney seemed to be signaling a shift.
“It should be
expected with him,” Tancredo told The Hill. “It’s not as if he’s a guy with a
deep philosophical commitment one way or the other ... there’s nothing you can
count on including any philosophical roadmap for his presidency. I don’t have
any idea what he’ll do, and I’m not sure he does.”
Tancredo said that
any version of the DREAM Act is “simply wrong.”
Romney will spend
Monday campaigning with Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who is working on
introducing his own version of the “DREAM Act” this summer that would give some
illegal immigrants permanent residency rather than a pathway to citizenship.
Many consider Rubio a top contender to be Romney's choice for vice president.
Romney also recently
added former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, a centrist on
immigration, as a senior adviser in his campaign.
Latinos are the
fastest growing voting bloc in the country, doubling as a percentage of total
voters in the 20 years between 1988 and 2008. Roughly 9.7 million Latino voters
turned out in 2008 – 7.4 percent of the total – and they supported President
Obama by a ratio of 2:1.
Romney's campaign and
the Republican National Committee have launched efforts to win over Latino
voters. Romney put out a statement on Friday arguing that Obama “has brought
hard times to Hispanics in America.”
Other top Republicans
said they though Romney had boxed himself in on immigration and would be
perceived as a flip-flopper if he tried to move toward the center.
“Anything that you
say and do in public or in your pajamas lives forever in cyberspace,” said Rep.
Steve King (R-Iowa.). “'Etch-a-sketch' is an archaic concept that cannot exist in
the modern social media world so I don’t think that that actually could work
and I don’t think that’s what’s going to be applied.”
King joked that
Gillespie isn’t “completely reformed yet” when asked about his views on
immigration, and pointed out that Romney had stressed his border hawk bona
fides numerous times in Iowa, a key swing state in the presidential race.
“Iowans are going to
want to the hear solid, consistent immigration policy that Mitt Romney has
delivered for five or more years in Iowa,” he said.
When asked if he was
trying to box in Romney on the issue, King laughed.
“I know what I heard
and so does cyberspace,” he said.
Romney’s campaign
declined to comment for this story.
Kansas Secretary of
State Kris Kobach (R), an informal adviser to the Romney campaign who co-wrote
Arizona's controversial immigration law, predicted Romney would stick with his
previous positions on border control.
“Governor Romney and
the Romney team remain firmly opposed to amnesty,” he told The Hill earlier
this week. “I’m not getting any sense he’s changing his positions. He’s staked
them out in the [presidential] debates with considerable specificity. He said
the Arizona bill should be a model. He said the concept of self-deportation
should be one that’s used. I hadn’t heard at all he’s moving and I doubt he
will.”
Kobach said that
Romney’s “DREAM Act” comments didn’t concern him — but said any support of a
bill that changed the status of illegal immigrants is beyond the pale for him.
“I would not be
amenable to any status adjustment for illegal aliens,” he said. “Any status
adjustment to illegal aliens would be amnesty — I would not be in favor of any
of that,” he said.
Tancredo expressed
hope that Kobach could convince Romney to hold his position on the DREAM Act
and keep up the rhetoric he used during the primary, but doubted he would.
“If I were in his
camp I’d counsel him to stand firm on it because I think it’s a winning
political issue, but I don’t know if there’s anyone high the campaign that will
advise him that,” he said. “My guess is Gillespie’s voice will be louder than
Kris Kobach’s."
*
PAT BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S
HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:
What is the response of
Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully
executed?
He is siding with the
law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a
Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is
commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to
fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
*
TOWNHALL.com
Whose
Country Is This?
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With
the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and
police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom
now reside there.
Arizona
acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to
protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration
laws.
"We
in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act,"
said Gov. Jan Brewer. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have
created an unacceptable situation."
We
have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.
What is the response of
Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully
executed?
He is siding with the
law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a
Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is
commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to
fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
He
has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice
Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's
civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona
who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in
their midst.
How's
that for Andrew Jackson-style leadership?
Obama
has done everything but his duty to enforce the law.
Undeniably,
making it a state as well as a federal crime to be in this country illegally,
and requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone they have a
"reasonable suspicion" is here illegally, is tough and burdensome.
But what choice did Arizona have?
The
state has a fiscal crisis caused in part by the burden of providing schooling
and social welfare for illegals and their families, who consume far more in
services than they pay in taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain
is now calling for 3,000 troops on the border.
Police
officers and a prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been
kidnappings believed to be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly
high-speed chases through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at
risk.
If
Arizona does not get control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens
will stop coming to Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already
fleeing California.
A country that cannot control
its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
What
we are talking about here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into
ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot
control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
The
tasks that Arizonans are themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right,
the Constitution and federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, and Homeland Security.
Arizona
has been compelled to assume the feds' role because the feds won't do their
job. And for that dereliction of duty the buck stops on the desk of the
president of the United States.
Why
is Obama paralyzed? Why does he not enforce the law, even if he dislikes it, by
punishing the businessmen who hire illegals and by sending the 12 million to 20
million illegals back home? President Eisenhower did it. Why won't he?
*
OBAMA
THE HISPANDERING PRESIDENT SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
*
Because
he is politically correct. Because he owes a big debt to the Hispanic lobby
that helped deliver two-thirds of that vote in 2008. Though most citizens of
Hispanic descent in Arizona want the border protected and the laws enforced,
the Hispanic lobby demands that the law be changed.
Fair
enough. But the nation rose up as one to reject the
"path-to-citizenship" -- i.e., amnesty -- that the 2007 plan of
George W. Bush, McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama envisioned.
Al
Sharpton threatens to go to Phoenix and march in the streets against the new
Arizona law. Let him go.
JOBS?
NO LEGAL NEED APPLY HERE!
Let
us see how many African-Americans, who are today frozen out of the 8 million
jobs held by illegal aliens that might otherwise go to them or their children,
will march to defend an invasion for which they are themselves paying the
heaviest price.
Last
year, while Americans were losing a net of 5 million jobs, the U.S. government
-- Bush and Obama both -- issued 1,131,000 green cards to legal immigrants to
come and take the jobs that did open up, a flood of immigrants equaled in only
four other years in our history.
What
are we doing to our own people?
Whose
country is this, anyway?
America
today has an establishment that, because it does not like the immigration laws,
countenances and condones wholesale violation of those laws.
Nevertheless,
under those laws, the U.S. government is obligated to deport illegal aliens and
punish businesses that knowingly hire them.
This
is not an option. It is an obligation.
Can
anyone say Barack Obama is meeting that obligation?
*
FAIRUS.org
The
Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department.
By
Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The
setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a
“Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing.
Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration
and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a
mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United
States.
Arguing
the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she
described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the
administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to
serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and
workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging
that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to
effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of
previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to
reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For
starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where
it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight,
she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country
as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its
approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the
interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed
worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If
Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP
speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he
wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data
to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of
border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for
the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the
same 894 miles.
The
administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is
just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers
shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that
administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between
2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for
criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments,
and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While
the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President
Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite
enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The
administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them
with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the
payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no
adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the
illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set
of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers
willing to accept substandard wages.
In
Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under
“effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of
immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard
to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything,
the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of
future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re
printed on.
As
Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy,
they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that
they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all
but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and
workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed
or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As
Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually
accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to
enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this
administration is “Mission Aborted.”
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
*
*
*
PERHAPS THE ARTICLE SHOULD BE TITLED “OBAMA AGAINST ALL OF
AMERICAN BUT ILLEGALS, AND HIS BANKSTER DONORS!
*
Black America vs. Obama?
"The Disappearing Black Middle Class" ran the headline over the Chicago Sun-Times story. And the statistics from the Economic Policy Institute were indeed sobering.
In 2007, best year of the Bush era, white households had a median net worth of $134,280, compared with $13,450 for black households.
By 2009, the median net worth for white households had fallen 24 percent to $97,860. For black households, it had plummeted 83 percent to $2,170, a near wipeout.
As Algernon Austin of EPI's Program on Race, Ethnicity and the Economy put it, "In 2009, for every dollar of wealth the average white household had, black households had two cents."
One explanation for this surely is the wave of foreclosures on subprime mortgages, a large share of which were held by African-Americans.
But while unemployment among white men has surged in the Great Recession, among black men it has hit 16 percent, the highest level since the Department of Labor began to keep records in 1972.
Ominously, things are likely to get worse, because Bill Clinton's assertion, "The era of big government is over!" is today palpably true.
Not only in Wisconsin, Ohio and New Jersey, run by Republicans, is this so, but in liberal mega-states like New York and California. There, Govs. Andrew Cuomo and Jerry Brown run the show, and government payrolls are also being slashed and government pensions pared back.
From Greece to Portugal to Ireland to Italy, an age of austerity has begun. And now that age is about to begin in Barack Obama's Washington.
Why should this adversely affect black America?
Because not only are African-Americans disproportionately the beneficiaries of federal programs, from the Earned Income Tax Credit to aid for education and student loans, they are even more over-represented in the federal workforce than they are on state payrolls.
Though 10 percent of the U.S. civilian labor force, African-Americans are 18 percent of U.S. government workers. They are 25 percent of the employees at Treasury and Veterans Affairs, 31 percent of the State Department, 37 percent of Department of Education employees and 38 percent of Housing and Urban Development. They are 42 percent of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 55 percent of the employees at the Government Printing Office and 82 percent at the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.
When the Obama administration suggested shutting down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants whose losses of $150 billion have had to be made up by taxpayers, The Washington Post warned, in a story headlined, "Winding Down Fannie and Freddie Could Put Minority Careers at Risk," that 44 percent of Fannie employees and 50 percent of Freddie's were persons of color.
In Washington, D.C., we have also seen the result of government cuts on African-American leaders who had to approve those cuts.
When Mayor Adrian Fenty stood behind schools chancellor Michelle Rhee, who fired hundreds of teachers, most of them African-American, the wards east of the Anacostia cut him dead. In 2010, Fenty was thrown out by many of the black voters who elected him.
Not only are African-Americans over-represented among government employees, these jobs are the backbone of the black middle class. For federal pay and benefits in recent years have far outstripped those of the private sector.
From 2000 to 2010, the number of federal employees earning over $150,000 increased tenfold. That number doubled in the first two years alone of the Obama administration. The average pay of federal civil servants in 2009, after benefits were factored in, was $123,000, twice the average pay and benefits of $61,000 in the private sector.
Indeed, because of the salaries and benefits that District of Columbia and federal employees receive, Washington is first among all metropolitan areas in per-capita income. And the three congressional districts north and west of the city in Maryland and Virginia are among the top 10 in the nation in average income.
The half-century since the Great Society was launched in the mid-1960s have been the salad days of the government sector. No segment of the population has benefited more than black America.
But with the U.S. government running its third deficit of 10 percent of gross domestic product, and Obama talking of cutting $4 trillion from future spending, those days are over. And as black America benefited immensely from the Great Society, so it is likely to hurt most as the cuts come.
Already, black voices are beginning to blame the black president whom fate has chosen to preside over the downsizing.
Obama, says Princeton professor Cornell West, "lacks backbone." He is a "black mascot of Wall Street and a black puppet of corporate plutocrats. ... I don't think in good conscience I could tell anybody to vote for Barack Obama."
Incredibly, the question must be asked.
Is this Democratic administration about to go to war with its base? Is black America souring on Barack Obama?
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/alipac-obamas-pursuing-executive.html
OBAMA QUIETLY PURSUING HIS BIT BY BIT BY BIT AMNESTY BY
NON-ENFORCEMENT!
ALIPAC NOTE: The US Constitution does not allow the President to
make policy out of legislation that has been defeated in Congress 8
times. These new authoritarian orders are not Constitutional and we are
asking all of our supporters to be ready for emergency measures in defense of
the American Republic in the coming weeks. This unlawful AMNESTY for
ILLEGAL ALIENS will not stand!
----
White House loosens border rules for 2012 elections
The Daily Caller
06/20/2011 | Updated: 7:31 PM 06/20/2011
President Barack Obama’s administration is quietly offering a quasi-amnesty for hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants aiming to win reelection by mobilizing a wave of new Hispanic voters without alienating the populous at large, say supporters of stronger immigration law enforcement.
*
----
White House loosens border rules for 2012 elections
The Daily Caller
06/20/2011 | Updated: 7:31 PM 06/20/2011
President Barack Obama’s administration is quietly offering a quasi-amnesty for hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants aiming to win reelection by mobilizing a wave of new Hispanic voters without alienating the populous at large, say supporters of stronger immigration law enforcement.
*
SHOCKING FACTS ON OBAMA’S FUNDING OF THE MEXICAN SUPREMACIST
MOVEMENT OF LA RAZA
*
*
*
*
No comments:
Post a Comment