HERE’S WHAT 20 YEARS OF BUSH,
HILLARY, BILLARY, BUSH and their combine WAR PROFITEER, and OBAMA DONOR, DIANNE
FEINSTEIN got us! WAVE AFTER WAVE OF CORPORATE RAPE and PILLAGE, BIG BUSH SAUDI
OIL – CARLYLE GROUP WAR AND OIL PROFITS, along with 38 MILLION “CHEAP” LABOR
ILLEGALS that loathe this country, our laws, flag, language and culture.
ALL ACCELERATED BY BARACK OBAMA’S
SELLOUT TO HIS BANKSTERS DONORS, BIG DRUGSTERS and LA RAZA.
Can we really afford to keep
electing these LIFER-POLITICIANS?
*
*
NEW YORK TIMES
January
5, 2010
Op-Ed
Columnist
An Uneasy Feeling
I’m starting the new year with the sinking feeling that important
opportunities are slipping from the nation’s grasp. Our collective
consciousness tends to obsess indiscriminately over one or two issues — the
would-be bomber on the flight into Detroit, the Tiger Woods saga — while
enormous problems that should be engaged get short shrift.
Staggering numbers of Americans are
still unemployed and nearly a quarter of all homeowners owe more on their
mortgages than their homes are worth. Forget the false hope of modestly
improving monthly job numbers. The real story right now is the entrenched
suffering (with no end in sight) that has been inflicted on scores of millions
of working Americans by the Great Recession and the misguided economic policies
that preceded it.
As The Washington Post reported over
the weekend, the entire past decade “was the worst for the U.S. economy in
modern times.” There was no net job creation — none — between December 1999 and
now. None!
The
Post article read like a lament, a longing for the U.S. as we’d once known it:
“No previous decade going back to the 1940s had job growth of less than 20
percent.”
Middle-class families in 2008 actually
earned less, adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999. The data for 2009
are not yet in, but you can just imagine what happened to those families in
that nightmarish downturn. Small children over the holidays were asking Santa
Claus to bring mommy or daddy a job.
One in eight Americans, and one in
four children, are on food stamps. Some six million Americans, according
to an article in The Times on Sunday, have said that food stamps were
their only income.
This is a society in deep, deep
trouble and the fixes currently in the works are in no way adequate to the
enormous challenges we’re facing. For example, an end to the mantra of monthly
job losses would undoubtedly be welcomed. But even if the economy manages to
create a few hundred thousand new jobs a month, it would do little to haul us
from the unemployment pit dug for us by the Great Recession. We need to create
more than 10 million new jobs just to get us back to where we were when the
recession began in December 2007.
What’s needed are big new innovative
efforts to fashion an economy that creates jobs for all who want and need to
work. Just getting us back in fits and starts over the next few years to where
we were when the recession began should not be acceptable to anyone. We should
be moving now to invest aggressively in a new, greener economy, leading the
world in the development of alternative fuels, advanced transportation networks
and the effort to restrain the poisoning of the planet. We should be developing
an industrial policy that emphasizes the need for America to regain its
manufacturing mojo, as tough as that might seem, and we need to rebuild our
infrastructure.
We’re not smart as a nation. We
don’t learn from the past, and we don’t plan for the future. We’ve spent a year
turning ourselves inside out with arguments of every sort over health care
reform only to come up with a bloated, Rube Goldberg legislative mess that
protects the insurance and drug industries and does not rein in runaway health
care costs.
The politicians will be back soon,
trust me, screaming about the need to rein in health costs.
We keep talking about how essential
it is to radically improve public education while, at the same time, we’re
closing libraries and firing teachers by the tens of thousands for economic
reasons.
The fault lies everywhere. The
president, the Congress, the news media and the public are all to blame. Shared
sacrifice is not part of anyone’s program. Politicians can’t seem to tell the
difference between wasteful spending and investments in a more sustainable
future. Any talk of raising taxes is considered blasphemous, but there is a
constant din of empty yapping about controlling budget deficits.
Oh, yes, and we’re fighting two
wars.
If America can’t change, then the
current state of decline is bound to continue. You can’t have a healthy economy
with so many millions of people out of work, and there is no plan now that
would result in the creation of millions of new jobs any time soon.
Voters were primed at the beginning
of the Obama administration for fundamental changes that would have altered the
trajectory of American life for the better. Politicians of all stripes, many of
them catering to the nation’s moneyed interests, fouled that up to a
fare-thee-well.
Now we’re escalating in Afghanistan,
falling back into panic mode over an attempted act of terror and squandering a
golden opportunity to build a better society.
*
WSWS.org … get on their free no-ads
emails.
*
New Year in America: A portrait of
social misery
By Tom Eley
5 January 2010
5 January 2010
The
new decade finds the US working class suffering a level of social misery not
seen since the Great Depression. Unemployment, poverty, hunger, utility
cutoffs, homelessness, foreclosures and bankruptcies have become common
experiences for millions.
But
unlike in the Great Depression, when limited reforms were put in place in
response to the crisis, the Obama administration, Congress, and state and local
governments are taking no serious measures to provide relief. On the contrary,
the two parties of big business are exacerbating the crisis through budget cuts
at the state and local level and the federal government is preparing new
austerity measures.
Unemployment:
At over 10
percent, the official US jobless rate reached in October and November was the
highest since June of 1983. A broader measure of unemployment, taking into
account those who have fallen out of the official workforce, reveals that
something approaching one in five workers is unemployed or underemployed.
The
economy has not added jobs since December 2007, and in that same time span has
lost 7.2 million jobs overall. Coupling these losses with population growth—the
economy must add about 150,000 jobs per month to break even—the net jobs
deficit in the period is well over 10.5 million.
It
is widely acknowledged that most of the jobs lost will not return for years, if
ever. Even by the optimistic forecast of the Federal Reserve Board, the jobless
rate will remain above 7 percent through 2011. Those without jobs face long
periods of unemployment, the most recent figures showing that 38.3 percent of
the unemployed have been without work for 27 weeks or longer.
Data
for November show that all 50 states have witnessed an increase in unemployment
since the end of 2008. Michigan continued to have the highest official jobless
rate at 14.7 percent. Detroit, its principal city and the longtime hub of US
auto production, had an official unemployment rate of 27 percent. The real rate
approaches 50 percent, a number in line with the worst levels of big city
unemployment during the Great Depression.
(THE
LA RAZA DEMS HAVE A SOLUTION FOR UNEMPLOYMENT IN CA. IT’S CALLED UNLIMITED
AMNESTY AND “CHAIN MIGRATION” SO THE REST OF MEXICO CAN HOP OUR BORDERS AND
JOBS!)
In
California, 12.3 percent of the official workforce was unemployed in November.
The most populous US state had by itself shed 617,000 jobs over the previous
year.
What
remains of the US social safety net is woefully unprepared to meet this crisis,
with jobless benefits reaching well under half of unemployed workers. In
December nearly ten million workers in the US were receiving jobless benefits,
not quite half of these in the form of extended or emergency relief. There were
some 5.6 million workers who had both exhausted their unemployment benefits and
given up looking up for work.
Those
fortunate enough to keep their jobs in 2009 saw their hours, wages and benefits
cut, even as employers drove up their productivity. In real terms, average
weekly wages fell by 1 percent last year, while worker productivity was
ratcheted up by 8.1 percent in the third quarter and 6.4 percent in the second.
Foreclosures
and bankruptcies:
Increasing numbers of unemployed and financially stressed workers have been
unable to meet their mortgage payments. During the third quarter, the number of
US homes in foreclosure surpassed one million. In October, a survey by the
Mortgage Bankers Association found that about one in ten mortgages was at least
one payment behind, while 4.47 percent were in the process of foreclosure.
Most
of the recent increase in foreclosures has occurred outside of the subprime
loan market, among households that had previously qualified for loans based on
stable employment and income.
The
Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that filings for personal
bankruptcy rose to 1.41 million in 2009, up by almost one third. The newspaper
called the increase “a surge largely driven by foreclosures and job losses.”
Poverty
and hunger:
Poverty and hunger, already on the rise in 2008 before the brunt of the
economic crisis hit, have intensified.
Analysis
of the 2008 US census using criteria favored by the National Academy of
Sciences shows that 47.4 million Americans, 15.8 percent of the population,
were living below the official poverty line. The official government tally
recorded 39.8 million people in poverty in 2008, or 13.2 percent of the
population. One in five US children was living in poverty in 2008, according to
the official data.
The
real poverty rate is far higher, since the income threshold set by the
government—$22,000 for a family of four—is absurdly low.
Judy
Putnam, a spokesperson for the Michigan League for Human Services, discussed
with the World Socialist Web Site her organization’s new study “Michigan
by the Numbers: Hard Times Continue.” According to Putnam, 22 percent of the state’s children
under five are growing up in poverty. For African American children, the figure
is 45 percent, with half the children in Detroit growing up poor.
“Many
of those who would have received cash assistance in past recessions are not
getting it now,” Putnam said. “Only a third are getting cash assistance
compared with two-thirds before ‘welfare reform’ in 1996. All of these folks
who need assistance have been squeezed off the safety net. People in Michigan
are heavily dependent on food stamps and, if they qualify, for unemployment
benefits. But unlike previous recessions only the very, very poor qualify for
cash assistance.”
The
evidence of widespread hunger in the US is unmistakable. In December, the
National Conference of Mayors released a study of 27 major cities conducted
between October 2008 and September 2009. The report revealed the largest
increase in those seeking food assistance since 1991.
In
November, the United States Department of Agriculture reported that a record
49.1 million Americans, one sixth of the population, lacked dependable access
to adequate food in 2008.
Also
in November, Feeding America, a national food assistance organization, released
details of an economic impact survey of some of its 63,000 member food
charities. It found that between summer 2008 and summer 2009, demand for food
charity rose by over 30 percent nationally.
Many
of those reliant on food assistance have no other source of income, a new
analysis of state data by the New York Times reveals. Six million
Americans, or 1 in 50, report no income beyond what they receive in food stamps
through the joint federal-state Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
(SNAP).
According
to a recent study published in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent
Medicine, about half of US children will rely on food stamps at some point
during their childhood. The figure is 90 percent for black children.
Homelessness
and utility cutoffs:
With a bitter cold snap settling over much of the nation last week, those
suffering homelessness and utility cutoffs found themselves in dangerous
conditions.
The
caseload of the government’s Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
increased by 25 percent in 2009, and is projected to increase by another 20
percent in 2010.
Among
the 27 major cities surveyed by the US Conference of Mayors report, 19 reported
an increase in family homelessness between the autumns of 2008 and 2009. The
largest increases were in Dallas (20 percent), Boston and Kansas City (22
percent each), and Charleston (41 percent).
Across
the US, shantytowns reminiscent of the “Hoovervilles” of the 1930s have
emerged. People in these encampments live in tents or shacks built of old wood,
scrap metal, cardboard and other waste, with no running water, electricity,
plumbing, or garbage removal.
An
indelible scene took place in Detroit on October 5, when an estimated 50,000
city residents formed a long line stretching around the Cobo Hall convention
center after hearing rumors that the city was dispensing assistance for utility
bills and housing payments. City officials said only a tiny fraction of those
seeking assistance would receive help.
Conditions
of the youth:
The economic crisis has exacted perhaps its greatest toll on the youth. All of
the data related to hunger, homelessness and unemployment show that young
people are disproportionately affected.
A
study by the Pew Research Center published in November shows that one in ten
adults under the age of 35 has moved back to his parents’ home as a result of
the recession. Overall, half of those aged 18 to 24 now live with their
parents. Only about half of young people have jobs, the lowest figure on record
dating back to 1948.
A
recent study showed that less than half of students graduate on schedule after
signing up for a two- or four-year college program, and that most who quit or
delay their studies do so on account of economic hardship.
Those
who do graduate enter the worst market for degree holders in 30 years, and with
record levels of student debt. The average college graduate in 2008 carried a
burden of $23,000 in student loan debt, while the unemployment rate for college
graduates aged 20 to 24 reached 10.6 percent in the third quarter.
Meanwhile,
one in ten male high school dropouts, ages 16 to 24, is currently either in
prison or juvenile detention. Among black male high school dropouts, more than
a fifth are incarcerated, a study by researchers at Northeastern University
shows. For the population as a whole, the Justice Department recently reported
that 1 in 31 US adults is behind bars or on probation or parole.
The
response of the government: The response of state and local governments to this social
catastrophe is drastic reductions in social services and job cuts, under
conditions where the Obama administration refuses to provide emergency aid to
help cover budget deficits.
The
total deficit of the states from 2009 to 2012 is now estimated at $460 billion,
a figure that is likely to grow as more state capitals adjust estimates for
rapidly declining tax revenue.
”Anything
and everything’s on the table,” said Todd Haggerty, a policy associate with the
National Conference of State Legislators. States have “cut the fat, cut the
muscle and are now cutting bone. The easy decisions have already been made.”
The
fiscal situation confronting the states is expected to deteriorate sharply next
year when funds from the federal economic stimulus package, the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act, are exhausted.
Like
the states, the federal government faces a fiscal catastrophe, with cumulative
US budget deficits expected to top $10 trillion by the end of the new decade,
according to the Obama administration’s rather optimistic forecast. Cuts in
spending must be put in place, in part, to convince creditors, especially
China, that the US “can get its finances back in order,” the Wall Street
Journal wrote Monday in a feature on the annual gathering of the American
Economic Association.
The
response of the Obama administration is to call for an unprecedented program of
fiscal austerity and sharp cuts in social spending, to be announced in his
State of the Union address early next month and outlined in the new federal
budget proposal shortly thereafter. Obama’s repeated insistence on the need for
Americans to reduce their consumption—even as trillions more are allocated for
the banks and for ever-expanding wars in Central Asia and the Middle East—is
code language for a deepening of the assault on the working class.
The
discussion of possible deficit reduction measures includes regressive taxes
such as a national sales tax and sweeping cuts in entitlement programs on which
millions of people rely, such as Medicare and Social Security.
Such
measures are on top of the administration’s health care overhaul, which will
reduce costs for corporations and the government while slashing benefits and
increasing out-of-pocket expenses for millions of working people.
*
Shaping up to be the most corrupt
administration in American history:
administration in American history:
- Obama’s team:
Not the “best of the Washington insiders,” as the liberal media style
them, but rather, a dysfunctional and dangerous conglomerate of
business-as-usual cronies and hacks
- In the first two
weeks alone of his infant administration, Obama had made no fewer than 17
exceptions to his “no-lobbyist” rule
- Why the fact
that the massive infusion of union dues into his campaign treasury didn’t
trouble him in the least reveals Obama’s credibility as a reformer
- The lack of
unprecedented pace of withdrawals and botched appointments -- and how
getting through the confirmation process was no guarantee of ethical
cleanliness or competence, even as Obama’s cheerleaders were glorifying
the Greatest Transition in World History
- Inconsistency:
How Obama, erstwhile critic of the campaign finance practice known as
“bundling,” happily accepted more than $350,000 in bundled contributions
from billionaire hedge-fund managers
- How Obama broke
his transparency pledge with the very first bill he signed into law --
helping make hostility to transparency is a running thread through Obama’s
cabinet
- Michelle Obama:
Beneath the cultured pearls, sleeveless designer dresses, and eyelashes
applied by her full-time makeup artist, is a hardball Chicago politico
- Joe Biden: It’s
not just that he lies, it’s that he lies so well that you think he really
believes the stuff he makes up
- Treasury
Secretary Geithner: His ineptness and epic blundering -- including how he
nearly caused the collapse of the dollar in international trade with a
single remark
- The appalling
story of Technology Czar Vivek Kundra, the convicted shoplifter in charge
of the entire federal government’s information security infrastructure
- Obama’s “Porker
of the Month” Transportation Secretary, Roy LaHood: An earmark-addicted
influence peddler born and raised on the politics of pay-to-play
- SEIU:
Responsible for installing a cabal of hand-chosen officers who exploited
their cash-infused fiefdoms for personal gain and presided over rigged
elections -- in the process, becoming all that they had professed to stand
against as representatives of the downtrodden worker
- How Obama lied
on his “Fight the Smears” campaign website when he claimed that he “never
organized with ACORN”
- ACORN: How the
profound threat the group poses is not merely ideological or economic --
it’s electoral
- ACORN’s own
internal review of shady money transfers among its web of affiliates: How
it underscores concerns that conservatives have long raised about the
organization
- Liar, liar,
pantsuit on fire: How Hillary Clinton has already trampled upon her
promise not to let her husband’s financial dealings sway her decisions as
Secretary of State
- How even a few
principled progressives are finally beginning to question the cult of
Obama -- even as Obama sycophants in the mainstream media continue to
celebrate his “hipness” and “swagga”
No comments:
Post a Comment