WHO PAYS FOR CA'S LA RAZA WELFARE & CRIME STATE?
CA IS IN MELTDOWN.
MEXICAN GANGS ARE GUILTY OF HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN LA RAZA INFESTED MEXIFORNIA.
JOBS ONLY GO TO ILLEGALS, EVEN IF THEY CAN'T SPEAK A WORD OF ENGLISH AND HAVE A POCKETFUL OF STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
CA PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. ON TOP OF THIS COUNTIES PAY OUT EVEN MORE. LOS ANGELES COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS AND MEXICO'S ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE PROGRAM.
CA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE NATION. HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.
OF LOS ANGELES' TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, 183 ARE MEXICANS.
AND YES... OBAMA AND PELOSI LIED ABOUT ILLEGALS NOT BEING PART OF OBAMAcare!
PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY. HER CORRUPT LA RAZA SISTER, SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, ONLY MILES FROM HER $16 MILLION DOLLLAR WAR PROFITEER MANSION!
THE UTTERLY WORTHLESS AND ENTIRELY CORRUPT SEN. BARBARA BOXER WAS REELECTED BY ILLEGALS BECAUSE OF BOXER'S LA RAZA DEM AGENDA OF AMNESTY, OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT!
*
ANCHOR BABY CASE STUDIES – HOW MEXICO BREEDS AN OCCUPATION AT OUR COST:
*
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE SYSTEM!
AND IT COSTS US BILLIONS!
*
|
Illegals Receiving Health Care …."But....( of course there is!)"
CNN INTERVIEW OF LYING LA RAZA PELOSI ON HEALTHCARE TO
ILLEGALS
“If you’re in this country illegally, should you be able to get health care?” CNN’s John King asked Mrs. Pelosi.
“No, illegal immigrants are not covered by this plan,” she replied.
Mrs. Pelosi’s remarks are downright deceptive, according to Congressman Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who points out that the proposed health care legislation “ contains gaping loopholes that will allow illegal immigrants to receive taxpayer-funded benefits .”
These loopholes, Rep. Smith maintains, are “no accident.” He maintains that the proposed legislation, despite months of debate, still contains no mechanism for verifying if applicants are legal residents or not.
The Republican members of the Ways and Means Committee attempted to address this loophole by an amendment proposed by Congressman Dick Heller (R-Nevada) which would have required applicants for government provided or subsidized health care to demonstrate eligibility through the Income and Eligibility Verification System (IEVS) and the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) systems.
The Federal for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) believes the legislation is now purposefully self-contradictory in order to ensure that the millions of illegal Latinos will receive coverage. FAIR points out that while one provision of the proposed health care reform bill states illegal immigrants will not be eligible for benefits, the legislation remains without any system of verification for determining if a patient is a legal or illegal U. S. resident.
Moreover, Fair insists, the bill leaves open the possibility that if one citizen family member is eligible for benefits, then the entire family — including illegal immigrants — is also eligible for the benefits.
“At a time when the federal government is running trillion dollar deficits, and the projected costs of the proposed health care overhaul seem to grow with each passing day, the committee that writes our tax laws wants Americans to pay for the health care costs of illegal aliens,” says FAIR President Dan Stein. “Given the opportunity to close loopholes that would cost the public billions of dollars each year, Democrats on the committee unanimously rejected an amendment that would bar illegal aliens from a national health care program.”
The cost of treating illegal aliens amounts to nearly $11 billion a year, according to calculations done by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a non-profit group that opposes illegal immigration. And that cost is not expected to go away if a health insurance reform bill becomes law.
According to FAIR’s Director of Special Projects Jack Martin, illegal immigrants presently cost U. S. taxpayers $10.7 billion a year for health care. The numbers are contained in a report that FAIR plans to publish in the near future.
“The current health care bill is looking as if it is leaving a very large loophole for medical coverage being provided to illegal aliens,” Martin said.
So again, yes, the speaker of the House can say: "We've made no provision for Health Care for Illegal Aliens". But, is she in fact telling you the WHOLE truth or only half a truth. I am an independent voter and I, at this point, have my opinion. You be the judge for your own opinion.
*
The politics of Healthcare Reform
from the AP -
"Immigration analyst James R. Edwards Jr. reported last week in National Review that "no health legislation on the table requires federal, state or local agencies -- or private institutions receiving federal funds -- to check the immigration status of health-program applicants, so some of the money distributed via Medicaid and tax credits inevitably would go to illegal aliens." Moreover, the Senate Finance Committee plan creates a preference for illegal aliens by exempting them from the mandate to buy insurance.
That's right. Lawabiding, uninsured Americans would be fined if they didn't submit to the ObamaCare prescription.
Lawbreaking bordercrossers and deportation fugitives would be spared.
For years, advocates of uncontrolled immigration have argued that illegals aren't getting free health care, and that even if they were, they'd not be draining government budgets. The fiscal crisis in California gives lie to those talking points. In March, the Associated Press reported that Sacramento and Contra Costa counties were slashing staff and closing clinics due to the prohibitive costs of providing nonemergency health services for illegals.
"The general situation there is being faced by nearly every health department across the country, and if not right now, shortly," Robert M. Pestronk of the National Association of County and City Health Officials, told the AP."
from the AP -
"Immigration analyst James R. Edwards Jr. reported last week in National Review that "no health legislation on the table requires federal, state or local agencies -- or private institutions receiving federal funds -- to check the immigration status of health-program applicants, so some of the money distributed via Medicaid and tax credits inevitably would go to illegal aliens." Moreover, the Senate Finance Committee plan creates a preference for illegal aliens by exempting them from the mandate to buy insurance.
That's right. Lawabiding, uninsured Americans would be fined if they didn't submit to the ObamaCare prescription.
Lawbreaking bordercrossers and deportation fugitives would be spared.
For years, advocates of uncontrolled immigration have argued that illegals aren't getting free health care, and that even if they were, they'd not be draining government budgets. The fiscal crisis in California gives lie to those talking points. In March, the Associated Press reported that Sacramento and Contra Costa counties were slashing staff and closing clinics due to the prohibitive costs of providing nonemergency health services for illegals.
"The general situation there is being faced by nearly every health department across the country, and if not right now, shortly," Robert M. Pestronk of the National Association of County and City Health Officials, told the AP."
Immigration bill sticker
shock $127 BILLION (dated)
A government study puts the cost of the Senate's version of
reform at $127 billion over 10 years.
By Gail Russell Chaddock - Staff writer of The Christian Science
Monitor
WASHINGTON
The price tag for comprehensive immigration reform was not
a key issue when the Senate passed its bill last May. But it is now.
One reason: It took the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) -
the gold standard for determining what a bill will cost - until last week to
estimate that federal spending for this vast and complex bill would hit $127
billion over the next 10 years.
At the same time, federal revenues would drop by about $79
billion, according to the CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation. If lawmakers
fix a tax glitch, that loss would be cut in half, they add.
In field hearings across the nation this month, House GOP
leaders are zeroing in on the costs of the Senate bill. It's a bid to define
the issue heading into fall elections and muster support for the House bill,
which focuses on border security. They say that the more people know about the
Senate version, including a path to citizenship for some 11 million people now
in the country illegally, the less they will be inclined to support it.
“WE ARE NOW JUST BEGINNING TO SEE
A GLIMPSE OF THE STAGGERING BURDEN ON AMERICAN TAXPAYERS” OF THE MEXICAN
INVASION.......
"We are now just beginning to see a glimpse of the
staggering burden on American taxpayers the Reid-Kennedy immigration
legislation contains," said House Judiciary Committee Chairman James
Sensenbrenner, who convened a field hearing at the State House in Concord,
N.H., Thursday on the costs of the Senate bill.
But business groups and others backing the Senate bill say
that the cost to the US economy of not resolving the status of illegal immigrants
and expanding guest-worker programs is higher still. "In my opinion, the
fairer question is: How will illegal immigrants impact the costs of healthcare,
local education, and social services without passage of comprehensive
immigration reform?" said John Young, co-chairman of the Agriculture
Coalition for Immigration Reform, at Thursday's hearing.
"Had we solved this problem in a truly comprehensive
way in 1986 ... we would not have the daily news reporting outright shortages
of farm labor threatening the very existence of agricultural industries coast
to coast," he adds.
Experts are poring over the new CBO data - and coming up
with radically different assessments of the social costs of reform, ranging
from tens of billions of dollars higher to a net wash.
On the issue of border security - a feature in both bills -
there is little disagreement. The CBO estimates that the cost of hardening US
borders in the Senate bill is $78.3 billion over 10 years, or about 62 percent
of the bill's total cost.
The fireworks involve new entitlement spending in the
Senate version. The CBO sets the price tag for services for some 16 million new
citizens and guest workers at $48.4 billion through fiscal year 2016. That includes
$24.5 billion for earned income and child tax credits, $11.7 billion for
Medicaid, $5.2 billion for Social Security, $3.7 billion for Medicare, and $2.4
billion for food stamps.
But it's easier to estimate the cost of a mile of fence than
to assess the prospects for millions of workers, once they can work legally and
claim benefits.
“THE AMNESTY ALONE WILL BE THE
LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE WELFARE SYSTEM IN THE LAST 25 YEARS” Heritage
Foundation
"The amnesty alone will be the largest expansion of
the welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector, a senior
analyst at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary
Committee field hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to
hit their peak around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very
narrow time horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If
even a small fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on
Medicaid, you're looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year."
No comments:
Post a Comment