http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/05/case-of-incest-barack-obama-and.html
Why hasn’t Obama been impeached?
His violations of our borders laws, inducing illegals to vote, sabotage of jobs
for Americans, connections to criminal banksters…. WHAT DOES IT TAKE?
NO WORKS IN THE CORRUPT OBAMA WHITE HOUSE THAT IS NOT
CONNECTED TO THE BANKSTERS THAT OWN OBAMA, OR THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA!
THE REASON OBAMA BROUGHT IN DALEY WAS BECAUSE WAS FROM
JPMORGAN, AND AN ADVOCATE FOR OPEN BORDERS.
For much of Obama’s tenure, Jamie Dimon was known as the
White House’s “favorite banker.” According to White House logs, Dimon visited
the White House at least 18 times, often to talk to his former subordinate at
JPMorgan, William Daley, who had been named White House chief of staff by Obama
after the Democratic rout in the 2010 elections.
OBAMA PROMISED HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS NO
PRISON TIME AND NO REAL REGULATION. DID HE DELIVER?
The JPMorgan scandal also throws into
relief the government’s failure to prosecute those responsible for the 2008
financial meltdown. Despite overwhelming evidence of wrongdoing and criminality
uncovered by two federal investigations last year, those responsible have been
shielded from prosecution.
The JPMorgan debacle
15
May 2012
The economic and
political fallout from JPMorgan Chase’s sudden announcement last Thursday night
that it lost more than $2 billion from speculative bets on credit derivatives
continued to grow on Monday. The biggest US bank announced the forced retirement
of Ina Drew, who headed up the bank’s London-based Chief Investment Office,
which placed huge bets on the creditworthiness of a collection of US
corporations. Other top executives and traders are expected to be sacked or
demoted.
The bank’s shares
fell another 3.2 percent, bringing its two-day market capitalization loss to
nearly $19 billion. The Wall Street Journal reported that JPMorgan was
prepared for a total loss of more than $4 billion over the next year from its
soured stake in credit default swaps—the same investment vehicle that played a
central role in the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the government bailout of
insurance giant American International Group (AIG) in September of 2008.In an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program on Sunday, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon sought to present the loss as an innocent mistake, resulting from “errors, sloppiness and bad judgment.” Only a month ago, Dimon, who has led the public campaign by Wall Street against even the mildest restrictions on speculative banking practices, dismissed warnings over the massive bets being made by his Chief Investment Office as “a complete tempest in a teapot.”
The scale of the loss and the denials that preceded it raise the likelihood that banking rules and laws against investor fraud and deception were breached.
President Obama, however, rushed to the
defense of JPMorgan and Dimon, declaring on a daytime television talk show
Monday that JPMorgan was “one of the best managed banks there is” and Dimon was
“one of the smartest bankers we got.”
At the same time he cited the bank’s loss as a vindication of the Dodd-Frank
financial regulatory bill that he signed into law in July of 2010. “This is why
we passed Wall Street reform,” he said.
In fact, the JPMorgan debacle
demonstrates that nearly four years after the Wall Street crash nothing has
changed for the financial aristocracy. No measures have been taken to rein in
the banks, which received trillions of dollars in government handouts,
guarantees and cheap loans. The same forms of speculation and outright
swindling that led to the financial meltdown and the worst economic crisis
since the Great Depression continue unabated.
The big banks, such as JPMorgan, have
increased their stranglehold over the US economy. They have recorded bumper
profits by withholding credit from consumers and small businesses, keeping
unemployment high, while speculating on credit default swaps and other exotic
financial instruments that drain resources from the real economy. On this
basis, bank executives and traders, including those at bailed-out institutions,
have continued to rake in eight-figure compensation packages. Last year, Ina
Drew made $14 million, and Jamie Dimon took in $26 million.The Dodd-Frank law trumpeted by Obama is a fraud, an attempt to give the appearance of financial reform while enabling the banks to continue their parasitic and criminal activities. A case in point is the so-called Volcker Rule, named after the former chairman of the Federal Reserve and economic adviser to the Obama White House, Paul Volcker.
The rule, incorporated into the Dodd-Frank Act and supposedly one of its most daring provisions, ostensibly bars proprietary trading—speculation by a bank on its own account—by commercial banks whose consumer deposits are guaranteed by the federal government. The idea is to prevent government-insured banks from speculating with depositors’ money.
But the regulation as drafted by federal regulators—under pressure from the Federal Reserve and Obama’s treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, as well as the banks—would actually allow the type of speculative bet made by JPMorgan in the guise of a “hedge” to offset risk in the bank’s overall investment portfolio.
The Volcker Rule, whose precise form is yet to be announced, will do nothing to halt speculation by government-backed banks using small depositors’ money.
The JPMorgan scandal also throws into relief the government’s failure to prosecute those responsible for the 2008 financial meltdown. Despite overwhelming evidence of wrongdoing and criminality uncovered by two federal investigations last year, those responsible have been shielded from prosecution.
When Iowa Senator
Charles Grassley submitted a letter to the Justice Department earlier this year
asking how many bank executives had been prosecuted in response to the
financial crisis, the Justice Department replied it did not know because it was
not keeping a list.
According to a study by Syracuse University, however, federal financial fraud prosecutions have fallen to 20-year lows under the Obama administration, and are down 39 percent since 2003. Under Obama, the number of financial fraud cases has fallen to one-third the level of the Clinton administration.
These facts demonstrate the de facto dictatorship exercised by the financial aristocracy over the entire political system and both major parties. The Obama administration, in particular, is an instrument of the most powerful financial institutions. It has focused its efforts on protecting and increasing the wealth of the privileged elite while utilizing the crisis to permanently slash the wages and living standards of the working class.
For much of Obama’s tenure, Jamie Dimon
was known as the White House’s “favorite banker.” According to White House
logs, Dimon visited the White House at least 18 times, often to talk to his
former subordinate at JPMorgan, William Daley, who had been named White House
chief of staff by Obama after the Democratic rout in the 2010 elections.
The incestuous and
corrupt relations between Wall Street, the Obama administration and the entire
political system underscore the necessity for the working class to build its
own mass socialist movement to fight for its interests in opposition to the
ruling elite.
The bankers
responsible for the financial crisis, including Dimon and his co-conspirators,
must be held criminally liable for their lawlessness and held accountable for the
social suffering that has resulted from their actions. The ill-gotten trillions
accumulated by the banks must be expropriated, with full protection for small
depositors and small businesses, and used to provide decent jobs, housing,
health care and education for all.
There is no way to
rein in the banks and end their socially destructive activities within the
framework of the capitalist system. The only way to stop the fraud and
parasitism that go on every day on Wall Street is to nationalize the banks and
run them as democratically controlled public utilities.
Andre Damon and Barry Grey
FACT: JP MORGAN IS ONE OF BANKSTER-BOUGHT OBAMA’S BIGGEST
PAYMASTERS! HE’S PROMISED THEM NO PRISON TIME AND NO REAL REGULATION.
THERE IS A REASON WHY THE BANKSTERS INVESTED HEAVILY IN
OBAMA’S CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION!
Records show that four out of Obama's
top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman
Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup
($358,054).
Obama: JPMorgan Is 'One of the
Best-Managed Banks'
By Mary Bruce | ABC
OTUS News – 2 hrs 31 mins ago
Obama:
JPMorgan Is 'One of the …
Lou
Rocco / ABC News
Just
hours after a top JPMorgan Chase executive retired in the wake of a
stunning $2 billion trading loss, President Obama
told the hosts of ABC's "The View" that the bank's risky bets
exemplified the need for Wall Street reform.
"JPMorgan is one of the best managed banks there
is. Jamie Dimon, the head of it, is one of
the smartest bankers we got and they still lost $2 billion and counting,"
the president said. "We don't know all the details. It's going to be
investigated, but this is why we passed Wall Street
reform."
The
full interview airs on "The View"
Tuesday on ABC at 11 a.m. ET
I know an illegal making over $2,000 a week at an auto upholstery shop. That's over 100K yearly! How many of our college-grad teachers earn that much? Most Americans DON'T.
And he told me he sends almost 90 percent of his paycheck home to his family in Mexico City, while living here with a "girlfriend" collecting welfare and food stamps.
Plus, he conserves his paycheck further by getting "free" food, clothing, etc. from taxpayer-funded agencies and church donations intended for our own needy people.
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.
*
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
From the Desk of
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:
Sotomayor Evasive, Disingenuous During Confirmation Hearings
The eagerly anticipated confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor got underway this week. And how did she do?
Let’s start with Sotomayor’s rambling and constantly shifting explanation for one of her most controversial statements – that she “would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.” This racist remark was made during a speech Sotomayor delivered to students at Cal Berkeley in 2001. The reason it is getting so much attention is that it calls into question Judge Sotomayor’s impartiality – and she made the remark repeatedly through the years. (Judicial Watch addressed this comment and many other troublesome statements and activities by Sotomayor in a letter to Senators Patrick Leahy, D-VT, and Jeff Sessions, R-AL, last week. You can read it by clicking here.)
During the hearing, at first, Sotomayor dismissed the statement as a “rhetorical flourish” that “fell flat.” However, under subsequent questioning Sotomayor attempted to defend her remarks, indicating that it was an attempt to “inspire” her audience. Of course Sotomayor quickly added that the comment has nothing to do with her attitude towards dispensing justice, which she claims is firmly rooted in the rule of law. (Action by the Supreme Court might argue this point, given that the High Court just overturned the decision she helped make in the Ricci racial discrimination matter. Click here for more.)
Sotomayor also tried to justify the comment by comparing it to allegedly similar ones made by Justice Alito and former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. And in another explanation she said her words shouldn’t be taken literally.
“I think she just made it more muddled,” said Senator Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee. In sum, Judge Sotomayor tried to deny the plain meaning of her “wise Latina” statements. This disingenuous approach may pass muster in Washington, but most people would be troubled by her lawyerly evasions.
Can you recall a Supreme Court nominee in recent years that has had to spend so much time defending their impartiality as a judge? I can’t.
On the issue of abortion Sotomayor said that she feels Roe v Wade is “settled law.” According to The Associated Press: “Supreme Court aspirant Sonia Sotomayor said Tuesday that she considers the question of abortion rights is settled precedent and says there is a constitutional right to privacy...Answering a question later from Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Sotomayor said that “all precedents of the Supreme Court I consider settled law…” This doesn’t mean much, as the Supreme Court regularly overturns its precedents.
Judge Sotomayor said she had no idea why one of her former colleagues at the New York law firm Pavia & Harcourt would say, "I can guarantee she'll be for abortion rights." Maybe he knew of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund’s radical pro-abortion agenda when she helped run the organization? But Judge Sotomayor professed to have no clue about the legal positions of her former group, despite the fact that she set the group’s litigation agenda.
Senator Lindsey Graham also initiated a tough, dramatic line of questioning with respect to Sotomayor’s temperament. In fact, Senator Graham flat out asked her: “Do you have a temperament problem?” (Sotomayor has been described as a “bully” on the bench.) Sotomayor attempted to defend herself against the charge but the issue was still left hanging in the hearing room.
Sotomayor’s problem for this hearing was a big one. She has had to defend the indefensible. She did this by reversing course, professing fidelity to the law, disavowing her radical judicial philosophy as described in her many speeches and writings, and by misleading the committee on one some of her more controversial decisions.
The judge went so far as to disavow President Obama’s lawless “empathy” standard for picking judges. Judge Sotomayor said that she would apply the law to the facts. She said, “Judges can’t rely on what is in their heart.”
In the end, she sounded like the most conservative nominee to the Supreme Court by a Democratic president in thirty years. (It is interesting that, even in the age of Obama, liberal jurists must pretend to be conservatives to gain Senate approval. It confirms the victory of conservatives in framing the public policy debate over liberal judicial activism. Even Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court must pretend to reject judicial activism.)
There is no question, given all of her “wise Latina” and other radical statements and her long-term connection to groups such as the far-left Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, that Judge Sotomayor is the wrong judge for a seat on the Supreme Court. I don’t believe her confirmation conversion to “fidelity to the law.”
Unfortunately, Republicans seem resigned to the fact that Judge Sotomayor will be confirmed with little debate, but it’s not too late to change the situation. You must make your voices heard! Even liberal Senator Feinstein (D-CA) admitted this week that she had received calls of concern on the Sotomayor nomination. These calls matter. Call the U.S. Capitol switchboard today at 202-224-3121, and let your senators know your thoughts.
Some in the press have characterized the Sotomayor hearings as “grueling.” I attended them for a bit and I found them interesting – in how a nominee can evade questions, deny her record, and largely control the room in the face of questioning by hapless senators. A well-prepared lawyer like Judge Sotomayor can do these types of hearings in their sleep.
There have been some tough questions for sure, but without an underlying commitment to carefully making the case against this nomination too many of the questions amounted to nothing more than “rhetorical flourishes” that “fall flat.” As a result, Americans may end up with a biased, activist justice on the Supreme Court.
Speeches reveal more about Sotomayor's thoughts on race
TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY
BASE OF ILLEGALS, OBAMA HAS UNLEASHED HIS CORRUPT HOLDER DOJ TO HARASS AND SUE
AMERICAN STATES LIKE ARIZONA.
OBAMA HAS SUED TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY SO
ILLEGALS GET OUR JOBS. HE’S SUED TO ASSURE ILLEGALS THERE WOULD BE NO I.D.
REQUIREMENT FOR ILLEGALS VOTING.
OBAMA’S SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS LA
RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS!
THE TAX- FREE MEX UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IN
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE IS CALCULATED TO BE $2 BILLION A YEAR. THIS SAME
COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION A YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS!
Untold Story of American Workers Vs.
Illegal Immigration
By William Gheen
*
Across America a terrible story unfolds trapping honest and hard working Americans between the proverbial rock and a hard space. It is a story that I have gleaned from conversations with those directly impacted. It is a story I have learned from reading between the lines in the print media.
Many of America's print media publications are now facing well deserved financial extinction due to their penchant for bias, censorship, and promotions of unpopular political positions, rather than reporting facts. No issue illustrates their heavy bias more than illegal immigration.
American readers are bombarded on a daily basis with the latest illegal alien sob stories about how illegal aliens are getting laid off, being profiled, discriminated against, or finding it harder to get licenses and government benefits from mean and hateful Americans, while the most important part of the story is conspicuously absent!
The Americans who are falling down in historic numbers are not in these articles or publications!
The propagandists at the newspapers should take heed, when I remind them of two important things. One, people read the news to learn the facts and not the asserted political positions of the paper. Two, readers look for characters in articles, as well as in movies and books, who they can identify with.
Americans are losing their wages, jobs, homes, health, and sanity in numbers unprecedented since the Great Depression, yet you will not hear their trials and troubles in your elitist newspapers. And if you do get a glimpse of the horror of your neighbors and fellow countrymen, you will most certainly never hear of what I will speak of next.
You will not hear about how illegal immigration is trapping Americans in a vise which is leading to the destruction of their lives.
I hope no one in America needs a lecture on how horrible losing your job can be when there are no other jobs available and that not being able to provide health insurance or even food for your children is a life threatening situation. Marching your belongings and loved ones out of your house in front of a Sheriff's deputy is a story Americans are living out in larger numbers daily.
Many studies tell us that American workers work harder, longer, and more productively than many others on the planet. We are known for getting the job done and done well. Before the recent political invention of "jobs Americans won't do" we got the houses built, the landscapes tended, the chickens plucked, and the bathrooms cleaned without 15 million illegal aliens in the country.
Here is the scenario and perspective you will not find in your newspaper that must be told to the nation.
It has long been a tradition in America for wage earners to take a menial job or an extra job, when times got tough for their individual families, a region, or during a national economic downturn.
If your husband was injured, the wife would take on an extra job waiting tables or as a cashier. If you lost your job, you would seek another one no matter what it was, as long as it would help you keep food on the table and a roof over you and your family's head.
In 2009, when you go to look for a new job of any kind you will find that many jobs are not even listed in the Want Ads because those jobs are filled with illegal aliens and a surplus of legal immigrants. The employers have no desire to spend money on newspaper ads, if they have an opening they just tell the foreman, ask their existing workers, or in some cases call up the drug and human importing cartels in Mexico to order a new shipment of illegal aliens workers, as was the case with Tyson Foods here in North Carolina.
So American workers are not even finding notices for many jobs in construction, landscaping, hospitality and food industries, agriculture, meat processing, textiles, raw materials production, etc...
And even if you do approach one of these employers, you may find yourself in the position that many ALIPAC supporters have reported.
The employers of illegal aliens and H2B visa immigrants do not want Americans in the mix. There is rampant discrimination against America workers because they do not speak Spanish, are more concerned about worker health and safety laws, and might contact Immigration and Customs Enforcement to report illegal workers and visa fraud.
Even if you did go out on your own to find the non-advertised menial jobs, and you made it past the discrimination factors, you still have two major hurdles.
One, multiple studies have documented the common sense knowledge that illegal immigration greatly depreciates wages for American workers and legal immigrants. As far back as 1968, the renowned labor leader Cesar Chavez patrolled the border and ordered his union to call Federal authorities to try and stop illegal immigration. Wages have been significantly depressed due to the intentional hyper inflation of the labor markets.
If you are a full tax paying and debt carrying American, many of these jobs now offer wages that are insufficient for you to even make ends meet!
But illegal aliens are not just in the menial jobs or unskilled labor sector of our economy. We have seen countless news reports over the last few years documenting illegal aliens working on commercial jet engines, or in nuclear power plants, or the technical fields?
With the almost minimal enforcement levels of our existing immigration laws, illegal aliens are working in jobs across the spectrum!
Anyone seeking a job in a call center or the Information Technology fields will find many of those jobs have been sent offshore to India. As for the jobs which remain here at home with Google, IBM, Microsoft, and many others, the positions are taken and being filled with H1B visa holders from India and China.
According to our unenforced existing immigration laws, an H1B visa worker can only be used, if an American worker cannot be found for the position and if the immigrant will be paid the same as an American worker would.
But, since nobody is enforcing those laws, many Global companies are intentionally throwing out their American workers and replacing them with foreign labor that will work for much less!
And if you go out in search of an American small business that plays by the rules and respects our laws, you will find fewer and fewer of them. Honest employers who hire Americans and legal immigrants have found themselves unable to compete with the low bids of less scrupulous competitors who hire illegal aliens. You won't hear their voices in this barage of biased articles either!
Only through the valiant efforts of talk radio show hosts and brave men and women like Glen Beck, Lou Dobbs, and Michelle Malkin will you hear these voices represented in the media. And each of them faces the same threat of smears and lies from the ideology fascists for speaking out for the innocent American workers and millions of victims of illegal immigration, corporate greed, and political corruption in our nation.
So American workers are facing what I call "The Great American Replacement Act" where Americans are being replaced in jobs, homes, schools, colleges, and at the ballot box through rampant illegal immigration combined with historically high levels of new worker visas being issued.
To ad further insult to injury, the illegal alien Amnesty supporting groups and politicians are now trying to claim that even though 11 Million Americans are out of work, we need Comprehensive Immigration Reform Amnesty right away for the approximately 7 million illegal aliens, which are currently holding jobs that our existing laws mandate are illegal for them to have in the first place!
How can so many politicians and people in the media ignore and neglect innocent Americans who are suffering and having their lives ruined? The dire consequences for Americans due to the bad economy combined with rampant illegal immigration are horrific. The fact that their stories are not told and their voices are censored by the print media is even more horrifying.
For things to improve for Americans, we need our existing immigration laws, and all workplace and financial regulatory laws fully enforced. Those left in the media with a soul need to illuminate these problems and side with the American public before it is too late.
We need to know how much the influence the billions of dollars in perks, contributions, and payoffs coming into Washington, DC (See Bill and Hillary Clinton) from Global corporations and countries hostile to the United States like Saudi Arabia and China are responsible for these dastardly, illegal, and unconstitutional policies.
The American public is no longer in control of our national destiny. We are no longer self governed or secure. We are not being asked for our support, we are being told we will suffer in silence or face aggressive ridicule. We are being dictated to by politicians who's pockets are lined with the gold of powerful bankers and foreign nations.
We are now entering an even more dangerous phase where many Americans are losing all faith in the political process. There is dangerous talk in private conversations, and many are saying "America has already been conquered without a shot fired."
Perhaps America's most powerful enemies have discovered how to take us with a Trojan horse? No adversary would want to take us on militarily or do anything to awaken the ire of the American populace. Our own politicians, bureaucrats, and Wall Street leaders have already deeply wounded this nation more than Osama Bin Laden's attacks on 9/11.
Perhaps they have moved on America's Achilles heal of greed and corruption to incrementally reduce the American populace to such a desperate level surrounded by financially empowered subservient foreign workers that we cannot defend ourselves.
If this is the case and if these atrocities are not corrected soon by political means, may God help us endure, survive, or prevail against whatever evil our conquerors have planned for us next.
http://newsblaze.com/story/20090113140640zzzz.nb/topstory.html
Across America a terrible story unfolds trapping honest and hard working Americans between the proverbial rock and a hard space. It is a story that I have gleaned from conversations with those directly impacted. It is a story I have learned from reading between the lines in the print media.
Many of America's print media publications are now facing well deserved financial extinction due to their penchant for bias, censorship, and promotions of unpopular political positions, rather than reporting facts. No issue illustrates their heavy bias more than illegal immigration.
American readers are bombarded on a daily basis with the latest illegal alien sob stories about how illegal aliens are getting laid off, being profiled, discriminated against, or finding it harder to get licenses and government benefits from mean and hateful Americans, while the most important part of the story is conspicuously absent!
The Americans who are falling down in historic numbers are not in these articles or publications!
The propagandists at the newspapers should take heed, when I remind them of two important things. One, people read the news to learn the facts and not the asserted political positions of the paper. Two, readers look for characters in articles, as well as in movies and books, who they can identify with.
Americans are losing their wages, jobs, homes, health, and sanity in numbers unprecedented since the Great Depression, yet you will not hear their trials and troubles in your elitist newspapers. And if you do get a glimpse of the horror of your neighbors and fellow countrymen, you will most certainly never hear of what I will speak of next.
You will not hear about how illegal immigration is trapping Americans in a vise which is leading to the destruction of their lives.
I hope no one in America needs a lecture on how horrible losing your job can be when there are no other jobs available and that not being able to provide health insurance or even food for your children is a life threatening situation. Marching your belongings and loved ones out of your house in front of a Sheriff's deputy is a story Americans are living out in larger numbers daily.
Many studies tell us that American workers work harder, longer, and more productively than many others on the planet. We are known for getting the job done and done well. Before the recent political invention of "jobs Americans won't do" we got the houses built, the landscapes tended, the chickens plucked, and the bathrooms cleaned without 15 million illegal aliens in the country.
Here is the scenario and perspective you will not find in your newspaper that must be told to the nation.
It has long been a tradition in America for wage earners to take a menial job or an extra job, when times got tough for their individual families, a region, or during a national economic downturn.
If your husband was injured, the wife would take on an extra job waiting tables or as a cashier. If you lost your job, you would seek another one no matter what it was, as long as it would help you keep food on the table and a roof over you and your family's head.
In 2009, when you go to look for a new job of any kind you will find that many jobs are not even listed in the Want Ads because those jobs are filled with illegal aliens and a surplus of legal immigrants. The employers have no desire to spend money on newspaper ads, if they have an opening they just tell the foreman, ask their existing workers, or in some cases call up the drug and human importing cartels in Mexico to order a new shipment of illegal aliens workers, as was the case with Tyson Foods here in North Carolina.
So American workers are not even finding notices for many jobs in construction, landscaping, hospitality and food industries, agriculture, meat processing, textiles, raw materials production, etc...
And even if you do approach one of these employers, you may find yourself in the position that many ALIPAC supporters have reported.
The employers of illegal aliens and H2B visa immigrants do not want Americans in the mix. There is rampant discrimination against America workers because they do not speak Spanish, are more concerned about worker health and safety laws, and might contact Immigration and Customs Enforcement to report illegal workers and visa fraud.
Even if you did go out on your own to find the non-advertised menial jobs, and you made it past the discrimination factors, you still have two major hurdles.
One, multiple studies have documented the common sense knowledge that illegal immigration greatly depreciates wages for American workers and legal immigrants. As far back as 1968, the renowned labor leader Cesar Chavez patrolled the border and ordered his union to call Federal authorities to try and stop illegal immigration. Wages have been significantly depressed due to the intentional hyper inflation of the labor markets.
If you are a full tax paying and debt carrying American, many of these jobs now offer wages that are insufficient for you to even make ends meet!
But illegal aliens are not just in the menial jobs or unskilled labor sector of our economy. We have seen countless news reports over the last few years documenting illegal aliens working on commercial jet engines, or in nuclear power plants, or the technical fields?
With the almost minimal enforcement levels of our existing immigration laws, illegal aliens are working in jobs across the spectrum!
Anyone seeking a job in a call center or the Information Technology fields will find many of those jobs have been sent offshore to India. As for the jobs which remain here at home with Google, IBM, Microsoft, and many others, the positions are taken and being filled with H1B visa holders from India and China.
According to our unenforced existing immigration laws, an H1B visa worker can only be used, if an American worker cannot be found for the position and if the immigrant will be paid the same as an American worker would.
But, since nobody is enforcing those laws, many Global companies are intentionally throwing out their American workers and replacing them with foreign labor that will work for much less!
And if you go out in search of an American small business that plays by the rules and respects our laws, you will find fewer and fewer of them. Honest employers who hire Americans and legal immigrants have found themselves unable to compete with the low bids of less scrupulous competitors who hire illegal aliens. You won't hear their voices in this barage of biased articles either!
Only through the valiant efforts of talk radio show hosts and brave men and women like Glen Beck, Lou Dobbs, and Michelle Malkin will you hear these voices represented in the media. And each of them faces the same threat of smears and lies from the ideology fascists for speaking out for the innocent American workers and millions of victims of illegal immigration, corporate greed, and political corruption in our nation.
So American workers are facing what I call "The Great American Replacement Act" where Americans are being replaced in jobs, homes, schools, colleges, and at the ballot box through rampant illegal immigration combined with historically high levels of new worker visas being issued.
To ad further insult to injury, the illegal alien Amnesty supporting groups and politicians are now trying to claim that even though 11 Million Americans are out of work, we need Comprehensive Immigration Reform Amnesty right away for the approximately 7 million illegal aliens, which are currently holding jobs that our existing laws mandate are illegal for them to have in the first place!
How can so many politicians and people in the media ignore and neglect innocent Americans who are suffering and having their lives ruined? The dire consequences for Americans due to the bad economy combined with rampant illegal immigration are horrific. The fact that their stories are not told and their voices are censored by the print media is even more horrifying.
For things to improve for Americans, we need our existing immigration laws, and all workplace and financial regulatory laws fully enforced. Those left in the media with a soul need to illuminate these problems and side with the American public before it is too late.
We need to know how much the influence the billions of dollars in perks, contributions, and payoffs coming into Washington, DC (See Bill and Hillary Clinton) from Global corporations and countries hostile to the United States like Saudi Arabia and China are responsible for these dastardly, illegal, and unconstitutional policies.
The American public is no longer in control of our national destiny. We are no longer self governed or secure. We are not being asked for our support, we are being told we will suffer in silence or face aggressive ridicule. We are being dictated to by politicians who's pockets are lined with the gold of powerful bankers and foreign nations.
We are now entering an even more dangerous phase where many Americans are losing all faith in the political process. There is dangerous talk in private conversations, and many are saying "America has already been conquered without a shot fired."
Perhaps America's most powerful enemies have discovered how to take us with a Trojan horse? No adversary would want to take us on militarily or do anything to awaken the ire of the American populace. Our own politicians, bureaucrats, and Wall Street leaders have already deeply wounded this nation more than Osama Bin Laden's attacks on 9/11.
Perhaps they have moved on America's Achilles heal of greed and corruption to incrementally reduce the American populace to such a desperate level surrounded by financially empowered subservient foreign workers that we cannot defend ourselves.
If this is the case and if these atrocities are not corrected soon by political means, may God help us endure, survive, or prevail against whatever evil our conquerors have planned for us next.
http://newsblaze.com/story/20090113140640zzzz.nb/topstory.html
COST OF MEXICAN OCCUPATION
FOR ALL THAT “CHEAP” LABOR:
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal
aliens each year by state 20 governments.
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
Verify 20 at! : http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are cause d by the illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html
11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.
Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://.com/t9sht
12. The National policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'
Verify at: http://www.nati onalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation
13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.
Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm>;
14. ' The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:! Nearly One million sex crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'
Verify at: http: // http://www.drdsk.com/articles.html
The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.
*
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
Verify 20 at! : http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are cause d by the illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html
11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.
Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://.com/t9sht
12. The National policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'
Verify at: http://www.nati onalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation
13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.
Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm>;
14. ' The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:! Nearly One million sex crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'
Verify at: http: // http://www.drdsk.com/articles.html
The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.
*
OBAMA, AND THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE SABOTAGED E-VERIFY
NATIONWIDE TO ASSURE THEIR CORPORATE PAYMASTERS DEPRESSED WAGES WITH HORDES OF
ILLEGALS.
IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA, THE LA RAZA (DEMS
ELECTED BY ILLEGALS) CONTROLLED STATE
LEGISLATURE HAS PASSED A LAW QUICKLY SIGNED BY LA RAZA JERRY BROWN, MAKING IT
ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!
HOW MANY AMERICANS PUT OUT OF JOBS?
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION
GREATER THAN MEX-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE NEARLY 90% OF ALL SERVICE
SECTOR JOBS, AND 95% OF ALL CONSTRUCTION JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS!
THIS SAME COUNTY ALSO PUTS OUT$600 MILLION IN
WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, THE LA RAZA ANCHOR BABY PROGRAM: MEXICO EXPORTS PREGNANT
WOMEN FOR “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING= 18 YEARS OF WELFARE. THIS CHILD BORN OF
ILLEGALS IN OUR BORDERS IS STILL A CITIZEN OF MEXICO! NOT
ONE LEGAL VOTED TO PAY FOR MEXICO’S WELFARE SYSTEM IN OUR BORDERS. EVERY DEM IN THE STATE
LEGISLATURE OR D.C. ARE SHOVING DREAM ACTS of WELFARE DOWN OUR THROATS TO
INDUCE MORE ILLEGALS TO VOTE FOR THEM, AND FILL OUR JOBS WITH STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE “CHEAP” MEX
LABOR!
*
Obama and the jobs crisis
12 November 2009
In the face of a record rise in joblessness,
the Obama administration continues to demonstrate its callous indifference to
the plight of millions of unemployed workers and their families.
The official
unemployment rate shot up to 10.2 percent in October, the highest level since
1983. Nearly 16 million people are jobless, an increase of 7 million since the
recession began. If workers who have given up looking for work and those forced
to work part-time are added, the real unemployment rate is 17.5 percent—or more
than one out of every six workers in the US—the highest rate since the Great
Depression.
The White House
responded to the job figures by repeating its mantra that employment is a
“lagging indicator” in an otherwise recovering economy. While acknowledging 10
percent was a “sobering number,” the president said, “History tells us that job
growth always lags behind economic growth.” The president added complacently,
“Although it will take time and it will take patience, I am confident that we
are moving in the right direction.”
The suggestion that
the unemployment trend will soon reverse itself is a lie. Most economists now
predict that double-digit unemployment will last for years. Nevertheless, the
administration has rejected any government-funded public works program to hire
the unemployed. The Washington Post recently noted that White House
officials reject the idea because it “does not produce long-term value”; that
is to say, it does not produce profits for big business.
The issue of
employment has long been at the center of economic and political life in
America. The last century saw New Deal public works projects, and “Full
Employment” programs, which, while woefully inadequate, were presented as an
effort to battle the scourge of mass unemployment. In the Obama administration
the question has become a non-issue.
This inaction and
indifference has produced a series of warnings from Obama’s liberal supporters
concerned over the explosive social and political consequences of a worsening
jobs crisis.
On Tuesday, New
York Times columnist Bob Herbert worried that “more and more Americans are
questioning [Obama’s] priorities, including millions that went to the mat for
him in last year’s election.” “The lack of jobs,” he continued, “is fueling the
nervousness, anxiety and full-blown anger that are becoming increasing evident
in the public at large.”
In a Washington
Post article, entitled, “Why won’t Obama give you a job?,” staff writer
Alec MacGillis complained that the administration has “studiously avoided
paying people to go to work” like the government did in the 1930s and 1970s.
“Engaging in more forthright job creation could invite some political pitfalls
(such as those constant accusations of socialism), but is double-digit
unemployment any less a political risk?”
Such appeals fall on
deaf ears. Obama’s disinterest is not a tactical mistake but the result of the
social and class interests the president and both political parties defend.
While doing nothing
to relieve working people, the administration has spared no expense and wasted
no time in augmenting the wealth and power of the financial oligarchy that
rules America. It has handed trillions to Wall Street, driven GM and Chrysler
into bankruptcy to slash the wages of auto workers, and pushed the
restructuring of the health care system to gut Medicare and reduce medical
costs for big business. In foreign policy, the administration has squandered
hundreds of billions and the lives of thousands of soldiers in two colonial
wars to control the energy rich regions of world.
The continued high
level of joblessness and economic insecurity is a deliberate aim of the
administration. The threat of job losses is being used to break the resistance
of American workers to a permanent reduction in their living standards and
working conditions.
In the July-September
quarter, productivity grew at a 9.5 percent annual rate, according to a
government report. Even though working hours fell by a 5 percent annual rate,
output increased at a 4 percent rate. “So people working shorter hours had to
do the same amount of work as before, or more,” BusinessWeek noted.
“People who kept their jobs had to pick up the work of ex-colleagues” or simply
put in extra hours that weren’t counted in the statistics. As a result, unit
labor costs fell 3.6 percent over the past year, the largest decrease since
records were first kept in 1948.
This increase in
exploitation is central to the administration’s plans to restructure American
capitalism on behalf of the most powerful sections of the financial elite. The
ruling class is seeking to lift itself out of the ruins of its own economic
crisis by transforming the US into a cheap labor platform to increase exports,
and by carrying out a policy of austerity at home to make the working class pay
for the bailout of Wall Street.
If the working class
is to oppose this assault it must assert it own class interests and develop a
programmatic response to the economic crisis.
The Socialist
Equality Party insists that employment and decent living standards must be
guaranteed to all. The guiding principle of jobs policy must be to protect the
working population from destitution, and provide employment for the purpose of
raising the material and cultural level of the people, not profits for the
capitalists.
The SEP calls for the
sharing of available work among all workers with no loss of pay. Every worker
should be guaranteed 30 hours of work at 40 hours of pay, with quality health
and retirement benefits.
A multi-trillion
public works program must be launched to hire the unemployed and put them to
work to address pressing social needs. Projects must be launched to build
affordable housing, guarantee high quality health care and education, expand
public transportation and carry out other improvements in the physical and
social infrastructure.
To secure the
necessary resources, the grip of the financial aristocracy must be broken by
nationalizing the banks under public ownership and confiscating the ill-gotten
gains of the rich and super-rich. Capitalism is incapable of meeting the social
needs produced by its own calamity. It must be replaced with a social system
that does, socialism.
In place of the
anarchy and socially destructive “free market” system, the economy must be
reorganized on the basis of a democratic plan to meet the needs of society as a
whole, not private profit. The socialist transformation of the US economy must
be part of a globally planned economy, in which working people control the
wealth that they produce.
The fight for this
requires the building of a new political party of the working class to oppose
the twin parties of big business and fight for political power. Such a party
must be based on the fight for its political independence, internationalism and
the socialist transformation of society. This is aim of the Socialist Equality
Party.
Jerry White
READER OF THE
WASHINGTON POST WRITES:
I know an illegal making over $2,000 a week at an auto upholstery shop. That's over 100K yearly! How many of our college-grad teachers earn that much? Most Americans DON'T.
And he told me he sends almost 90 percent of his paycheck home to his family in Mexico City, while living here with a "girlfriend" collecting welfare and food stamps.
Plus, he conserves his paycheck further by getting "free" food, clothing, etc. from taxpayer-funded agencies and church donations intended for our own needy people.
*
OBAMA, AND THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE SABOTAGED E-VERIFY
NATIONWIDE TO ASSURE THEIR CORPORATE PAYMASTERS DEPRESSED WAGES WITH HORDES OF
ILLEGALS.
IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA, THE LA RAZA (DEMS
ELECTED BY ILLEGALS) CONTROLLED STATE
LEGISLATURE HAS PASSED A LAW QUICKLY SIGNED BY LA RAZA JERRY BROWN, MAKING IT
ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!
HOW MANY AMERICANS PUT OUT OF JOBS?
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION
GREATER THAN MEX-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE NEARLY 90% OF ALL SERVICE
SECTOR JOBS, AND 95% OF ALL CONSTRUCTION JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS!
THIS SAME COUNTY ALSO PUTS OUT$600 MILLION IN
WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, THE LA RAZA ANCHOR BABY PROGRAM: MEXICO EXPORTS PREGNANT
WOMEN FOR “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING= 18 YEARS OF WELFARE. THIS CHILD BORN OF
ILLEGALS IN OUR BORDERS IS STILL A CITIZEN OF MEXICO! NOT
ONE LEGAL VOTED TO PAY FOR MEXICO’S WELFARE SYSTEM IN OUR BORDERS. EVERY DEM IN THE STATE
LEGISLATURE OR D.C. ARE SHOVING DREAM ACTS of WELFARE DOWN OUR THROATS TO
INDUCE MORE ILLEGALS TO VOTE FOR THEM, AND FILL OUR JOBS WITH STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE “CHEAP” MEX
LABOR!
Obama and the jobs crisis
12 November 2009
In
the face of a record rise in joblessness, the Obama administration continues to
demonstrate its callous indifference to the plight of millions of unemployed
workers and their families.
The
official unemployment rate shot up to 10.2 percent in October, the highest
level since 1983. Nearly 16 million people are jobless, an increase of 7
million since the recession began. If workers who have given up looking for
work and those forced to work part-time are added, the real unemployment rate
is 17.5 percent—or more than one out of every six workers in the US—the highest
rate since the Great Depression.
The
White House responded to the job figures by repeating its mantra that
employment is a “lagging indicator” in an otherwise recovering economy. While
acknowledging 10 percent was a “sobering number,” the president said, “History
tells us that job growth always lags behind economic growth.” The president
added complacently, “Although it will take time and it will take patience, I am
confident that we are moving in the right direction.”
The
suggestion that the unemployment trend will soon reverse itself is a lie. Most
economists now predict that double-digit unemployment will last for years.
Nevertheless, the administration has rejected any government-funded public
works program to hire the unemployed. The Washington Post recently noted
that White House officials reject the idea because it “does not produce
long-term value”; that is to say, it does not produce profits for big business.
The
issue of employment has long been at the center of economic and political life
in America. The last century saw New Deal public works projects, and “Full
Employment” programs, which, while woefully inadequate, were presented as an
effort to battle the scourge of mass unemployment. In the Obama administration
the question has become a non-issue.
This
inaction and indifference has produced a series of warnings from Obama’s
liberal supporters concerned over the explosive social and political
consequences of a worsening jobs crisis.
On
Tuesday, New York Times columnist Bob Herbert worried that “more and
more Americans are questioning [Obama’s] priorities, including millions that
went to the mat for him in last year’s election.” “The lack of jobs,” he
continued, “is fueling the nervousness, anxiety and full-blown anger that are
becoming increasing evident in the public at large.”
In
a Washington Post article, entitled, “Why won’t Obama give you a job?,”
staff writer Alec MacGillis complained that the administration has “studiously
avoided paying people to go to work” like the government did in the 1930s and
1970s. “Engaging in more forthright job creation could invite some political
pitfalls (such as those constant accusations of socialism), but is double-digit
unemployment any less a political risk?”
Such
appeals fall on deaf ears. Obama’s disinterest is not a tactical mistake but
the result of the social and class interests the president and both political
parties defend.
While
doing nothing to relieve working people, the administration has spared no
expense and wasted no time in augmenting the wealth and power of the financial
oligarchy that rules America. It has handed trillions to Wall Street, driven GM
and Chrysler into bankruptcy to slash the wages of auto workers, and pushed the
restructuring of the health care system to gut Medicare and reduce medical
costs for big business. In foreign policy, the administration has squandered
hundreds of billions and the lives of thousands of soldiers in two colonial
wars to control the energy rich regions of world.
The
continued high level of joblessness and economic insecurity is a deliberate aim
of the administration. The threat of job losses is being used to break the
resistance of American workers to a permanent reduction in their living
standards and working conditions.
In
the July-September quarter, productivity grew at a 9.5 percent annual rate,
according to a government report. Even though working hours fell by a 5 percent
annual rate, output increased at a 4 percent rate. “So people working shorter
hours had to do the same amount of work as before, or more,” BusinessWeek
noted. “People who kept their jobs had to pick up the work of ex-colleagues” or
simply put in extra hours that weren’t counted in the statistics. As a result,
unit labor costs fell 3.6 percent over the past year, the largest decrease
since records were first kept in 1948.
This
increase in exploitation is central to the administration’s plans to
restructure American capitalism on behalf of the most powerful sections of the
financial elite. The ruling class is seeking to lift itself out of the ruins of
its own economic crisis by transforming the US into a cheap labor platform to
increase exports, and by carrying out a policy of austerity at home to make the
working class pay for the bailout of Wall Street.
If
the working class is to oppose this assault it must assert it own class
interests and develop a programmatic response to the economic crisis.
The
Socialist Equality Party insists that employment and decent living standards
must be guaranteed to all. The guiding principle of jobs policy must be to
protect the working population from destitution, and provide employment for the
purpose of raising the material and cultural level of the people, not profits
for the capitalists.
The
SEP calls for the sharing of available work among all workers with no loss of
pay. Every worker should be guaranteed 30 hours of work at 40 hours of pay,
with quality health and retirement benefits.
A
multi-trillion public works program must be launched to hire the unemployed and
put them to work to address pressing social needs. Projects must be launched to
build affordable housing, guarantee high quality health care and education,
expand public transportation and carry out other improvements in the physical
and social infrastructure.
To
secure the necessary resources, the grip of the financial aristocracy must be
broken by nationalizing the banks under public ownership and confiscating the
ill-gotten gains of the rich and super-rich. Capitalism is incapable of meeting
the social needs produced by its own calamity. It must be replaced with a
social system that does, socialism.
In
place of the anarchy and socially destructive “free market” system, the economy
must be reorganized on the basis of a democratic plan to meet the needs of
society as a whole, not private profit. The socialist transformation of the US
economy must be part of a globally planned economy, in which working people
control the wealth that they produce.
The
fight for this requires the building of a new political party of the working
class to oppose the twin parties of big business and fight for political power.
Such a party must be based on the fight for its political independence,
internationalism and the socialist transformation of society. This is aim of
the Socialist Equality Party.
Jerry
White
*
AN AMERICAN SEES
& SPEAKS
tncdel wrote:
It appears that Pelosi isn't as
clueless and out-of-touch as many of us thought ... at least not as far as
being aware that she needs to do something to be re-elected.
But how can she justify her position on trying to give amnesty and everything else [even a Dream Act to go to college for Chrissakes!] to the over 20 million illegals in the U.S., so as to encourage them to invite all their extended family members and job-stealing amigos to come here too?
Pelosi sends mixed signals to those she is supposed to be serving, by instead serving the interests of foreign nationals here illegally.
How can the Democrats claim in good faith that they are truly concerned about our country's economy as long as they are trying to do things that wreak havoc upon it?
I know an illegal making over $2,000 a week at an auto upholstery shop. That's over 100K yearly! How many of our college-grad teachers earn that much? Most Americans DON'T.
And he told me he sends almost 90 percent of his paycheck home to his family in Mexico City, while living here with a "girlfriend" collecting welfare and food stamps.
Plus, he conserves his paycheck further by getting "free" food, clothing, etc. from taxpayer-funded agencies and church donations intended for our own needy people.
He even got one taxpayer-funded Latin Community group to pay for his CELLPHONE! So he can stay in touch with his family.
The illegal alien's name is Ruben. And that car upholstery shop has a "phantom workforce" to supplement its legally employed workforce, which is all they report for tax purposes. Ruben's brother also works there.
Here's how he gets paid: If the shop charges a customer $1500 to re-upholster car seats, and it only takes Ruben 3 hours to do it, he gets HALF. So he gets paid about $250 per hour. And both Ruben and the shop are quite happy with their arrangement.
I reported it, giving the name and location of the shop, to my Democrat federal senator's office, asking them to investigate and prosecute. But they ignored my request... which is typical of most Democrats and many Republicans in Congress. For they are deliberately turning a blind eye to it.
This is far from an isolated example. Illegals are not only stealing high-paying skilled blue-collar type jobs, but also many illegals own their own businesses [construction, home improvement, landscaping, auto repair, roofing, paving, janitorial services, housekeeping, etc., etc.].
Next time you're in Home Depot or Lowes, look for illegals there getting supplies for their plumbing jobs, etc.
I have a friend who tried starting a janitorial services business. But he gave up after a few months, telling me he couldn't compete with illegals paying their illegal employees $3 an hour.
Another illegal near me was selling used cars with open titles, parking them at a shopping center with "for sale" signs on anywhere from one to three cars at a time. And he was selling them quickly. Every week I saw different cars. But I reported it to my state's motor vehicle department, and about a month later they towed his cars away and warned the shopping center to not let anyone sell cars there.
In Pelosi's state she has allowed them to bankrupt over 100 hospitals and to render California's infrastructure virtually gasping for its breath.
But how can she justify her position on trying to give amnesty and everything else [even a Dream Act to go to college for Chrissakes!] to the over 20 million illegals in the U.S., so as to encourage them to invite all their extended family members and job-stealing amigos to come here too?
Pelosi sends mixed signals to those she is supposed to be serving, by instead serving the interests of foreign nationals here illegally.
How can the Democrats claim in good faith that they are truly concerned about our country's economy as long as they are trying to do things that wreak havoc upon it?
I know an illegal making over $2,000 a week at an auto upholstery shop. That's over 100K yearly! How many of our college-grad teachers earn that much? Most Americans DON'T.
And he told me he sends almost 90 percent of his paycheck home to his family in Mexico City, while living here with a "girlfriend" collecting welfare and food stamps.
Plus, he conserves his paycheck further by getting "free" food, clothing, etc. from taxpayer-funded agencies and church donations intended for our own needy people.
He even got one taxpayer-funded Latin Community group to pay for his CELLPHONE! So he can stay in touch with his family.
The illegal alien's name is Ruben. And that car upholstery shop has a "phantom workforce" to supplement its legally employed workforce, which is all they report for tax purposes. Ruben's brother also works there.
Here's how he gets paid: If the shop charges a customer $1500 to re-upholster car seats, and it only takes Ruben 3 hours to do it, he gets HALF. So he gets paid about $250 per hour. And both Ruben and the shop are quite happy with their arrangement.
I reported it, giving the name and location of the shop, to my Democrat federal senator's office, asking them to investigate and prosecute. But they ignored my request... which is typical of most Democrats and many Republicans in Congress. For they are deliberately turning a blind eye to it.
This is far from an isolated example. Illegals are not only stealing high-paying skilled blue-collar type jobs, but also many illegals own their own businesses [construction, home improvement, landscaping, auto repair, roofing, paving, janitorial services, housekeeping, etc., etc.].
Next time you're in Home Depot or Lowes, look for illegals there getting supplies for their plumbing jobs, etc.
I have a friend who tried starting a janitorial services business. But he gave up after a few months, telling me he couldn't compete with illegals paying their illegal employees $3 an hour.
Another illegal near me was selling used cars with open titles, parking them at a shopping center with "for sale" signs on anywhere from one to three cars at a time. And he was selling them quickly. Every week I saw different cars. But I reported it to my state's motor vehicle department, and about a month later they towed his cars away and warned the shopping center to not let anyone sell cars there.
In Pelosi's state she has allowed them to bankrupt over 100 hospitals and to render California's infrastructure virtually gasping for its breath.
*
AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS
I THOUGHT ILLEGALS CAME TO WORK (haight ashbury)
it seems that
they came to fleece us. they get food stamps, section eight housing medical,
heat vouchers, and a job off the books that they stole from an american citizen
who jusy happens to not have a college degree. What do we get in return? we get
a violent culture where their own politicians get killed if they don't follow
the drug lords' will. We get gangs of cowards who have no respect for human
life.We get drive-by shootings. We get our jails filled up.They force other
weaker illegals into the sex trade. we get our cars stolen, our children raped,
our homes, burglarized and for what? So a handful of selfish politicians can
get elected by catering to the hispanic vote. I'm very disappointed in american
hispanics who put foreign hispanics before their own countrymen of a different
color. To me, it shows their true colors and that it is all about increasing
their political power. You know we whites can play the racist game too. What
have mexicans ever invented? Cars, planes, trains, phones, t.v.,
computers,sewing machines, rocket ships that can take a man to the moon and
beyond. WHAT? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Yet we americans are willing to share all
these things with you ,even though you people didn't know what a wheel was or
how to use it when we met you! But still you people come over in record numbers
and try to take over. If you ever did take over through the selfishness of our
self centered politicians who are in reality traitors under the guise of
liberalism, evolution and progress would come to a screeching halt and within a
few centuries we would be like 'planet of the apes'.
*
“What's
needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known
for years: Enforce existing law.” CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN
IS TO CUT WAGES!
“We could cut
unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers,”
said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim
American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on the wrong side of the American
people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens
and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to
enforce immigration laws.”
*
MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE
GENEROUS DONORS TO LA RAZA – THE MEXICAN FASCIST POLITICAL PARTY. THESE FIGURES
ARE DATED. CNN CALCULATES THAT WAGES ARE DEPRESSED $300 - $400 BILLION PER
YEAR!
“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration
policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for
low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers
lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding
of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor
*
Illegals
make more than US workers
Joe Legal
works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour
with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Ready? Now pay attention...
Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year.. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631 .00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $280.00 per family member/ month federal CASH AID for four family members . Jose Illegal has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.
Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $ 43,200.00. stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.."actually Jose illegal doesn't pay for most utilities in many states as he gets county assistance to pay the bills and his late fees"
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work. "and pays a higher tax rate if he earns above a certain amount"
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Ready? Now pay attention...
Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year.. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631 .00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $280.00 per family member/ month federal CASH AID for four family members . Jose Illegal has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.
Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $ 43,200.00.
Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $ 43,200.00. stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.."actually Jose illegal doesn't pay for most utilities in many states as he gets county assistance to pay the bills and his late fees"
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work. "and pays a higher tax rate if he earns above a certain amount"
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
…. AND THEN
JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILL TO SUPPORT ALL THIS “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR,
AND THE CRIME TIDAL WAVE THAT COMES WITH THE OCCUPATION!
*
In Los Angeles 47% of those
employed are illegals. What is it the rest of the state (which pays out $18
billion per year in social services to illegals)??? Look around you anywhere
and see how many speak English? Know of any construction sites that have an
American born tradesman that actually speaks English?
Working tirelessly for employers
breaking the law by hiring illegals are: Feinstein, Boxer, Pelosi, Waxman,
Eshoo, Lofgren, Farr, Baca, and La Raza candidate for governor, Antonio “Taco
Runt” Villaraigosa.
OBAMA
HANDS MASSIVE WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, ALONG WITH OUR JOBS TO BUY THE ILLEGALS'
ILLEGAL VOTES!
The
truth about the DREAM Act
Published
March 20, 2012
|
FoxNews.com
The
DREAM Act has become a rallying cry for President Obama, members of his
administration, and liberal Democrats everywhere. President Obama has vowed to
“keep fighting for the DREAM Act,” which would grant amnesty to millions of
illegal immigrants.
It’s
true when listeners or those polled don’t know the facts that the DREAM Act has
some appeal. After all, we are all naturally sympathetic when children are
involved.
But
the descriptions of the DREAM Act voiced by President Obama and his cohorts are
not accurate. And the consequences are never told.
DREAM
Act supporters claim that only children would benefit from such a bill, but the
facts tell another story. Under most DREAM Act proposals, amnesty would be
given to individuals up to the age of 30—not exactly children. And some other
proposals don’t even have an age limit.
These
supporters also maintain that illegal immigrants can’t go college without the
DREAM Act. But the truth is that illegal immigrants can already go to college
in most states.
And
ultimately, most versions of the DREAM Act actually don’t even force illegal
immigrants to comply with all the requirements in the bill, such as going to
college or joining the military. The administration can waive requirements
because of “hardship”at its complete discretion.
DREAM Act proposals are
also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal immigrants will fraudulently claim they
came here as children or that they are under 30. And the federal government has
no way to check whether their claims are true or not.
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S AGENDA OF LA RAZ SUPREMACY AND AN ILLEGAL
IN EVERY AMERICAN JOB TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED. THE LEGALS GET THE TAX BILLS FOR
THE MEX WELFARE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE.
AT A TIME OF UNEMPLOYMENT CRISIS, OBAMA HAS SUED
THE STATE OF ARIZONA FOR IMPLEMENTING E-VERIFY! OBVIOUSLY IF OBAMA DIDN'T KNOW
THAT E-VERIFY KEPT ILLEGALS OUT OF AMERICAN JOBS, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BOTHERED.
THE MAN WILL DO ANYTHING TO BUILD IS PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.
*
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
FROM HIS VERY FIRST DAY IN OFFICE, OBAMA HAS LIED TO THIS
NATION AS HE SERVICED HIS BANKSTER DONORS, AND BUILT HIS LA RAZA “THE RACE”
PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS!
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH CRIMINAL
BANKSTERS, LIKE TIM GEITHNER, AND LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, LIKE OBAMA’S SEC. of
LABOR HILDA SOLIS, OR LA RAZA V.P. CECELIA MUNOZ.
OBAMA’S CANDIDATE FOR THE SUPREME COURT WOULD HAVE TO BE A
PANDERER TO THE SPECIAL INTERESTS, AND LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER! HE FOUND SUCH A
CANDIDATE IN THE SELF-STYLED “WISE LATINA” SOTOMAYER, A MEMBER of THE MEXICAN
FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! ON THE BENCH, SOTOMAYER
REFERS TO ILLEGALS NOT AS LAWBREAKERS, BUT AS “UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”. OBAMA
REFERS TO ILLEGALS AS HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”!
*
BARACK OBAMA FROM THE FLOOR of the SENATE – STATE of the
UNION MESSAGE:
“I’m not here to punish banks!” ONE
OF THE FEW TRUTHS THIS MAN HAS EVER TOLD!
“Illegals
are not including in Obamacare” A LIE
*
OBAMA’S DEPT. of LA RAZA JUSTICE HAS CAUTIOUSLY DANCED
AROUND THE PROSECUTION OF ANY OF OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, BUT HAS
RABIDLY FOUGHT AGAINST AMERICAN INTERESTS, OUR LAWS, BORDERS AND VOTING LIMITED
TO AMERICAN CITIZENS!
OBAMA HAS SUED FOUR AMERICAN STATES ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA
PARTY BASE.
OBAMA HAS SUE ARIZONA, AN AMERICAN STATE THAT HAS ATTEMPTED
TO PUSH BACK THE MEX INVASION, CRIME STATE, WELFARE STATE, AND NARCOMEX
INVASION!
OBAMA HAS SUED TO STOP E-VERIFY TO ASSURE HIS PARTY BASE OF
ILLEGALS A QUICK PATHWAY TO OUR JOBS, AND VOTING BOOTHS.
OBAMA HAS SUED AMERICAN STATES TO STOP THESE STATES FROM
REQUIRING I.D.S TO HALT THE LA RAZA GET OUT THE VOTE!
OBAMA HAS TURNED OVER MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO THE MEXICAN
FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA TO HELP THEM ORGANIZE ILLEGALS INTO VOTING!
VIVA LA RAZA?
WHILE OBAMA HAS DONE FUCKING NOTHING FOR BLACK AMERICA, HE’S
GROVELED AT THE FEET OF HIS BANKSTERS AND LA RAZA FROM DAY ONE!!!
VOTERS). SOTOMAYER VOTED AGAINST MAKING E-VERIFY MANDATORY
NATION WIDE!
*
The fundamental social division is
class, not race or gender
28 May 2009
The introduction of Sonia
Sotomayor as President Obama’s first selection for the US Supreme Court took
place at a White House media event of a completely choreographed and
stereotyped character. Such ceremonies have become an essential part of how
America is governed. The less the political system is capable of actually
responding to the needs and aspirations of working people, the more it must put
on the pretense of concern, using biography as a substitute for policy.
As always on such occasions,
the nomination’s “roll-out” was an unrestrained exercise in public
tear-jerking. Led by President Obama, who based his own campaign on the
marketing of a compelling personal “narrative,” Sotomayor’s elevation was
presented as a triumph over all manner of adversity. There were tributes to the
humble origins of the future Supreme Court justice, noting her hard-working
immigrant parents, her poverty-stricken childhood in a South Bronx housing
project, the death of her father when she was nine years old, and even her struggle
with juvenile diabetes.
No doubt, it has not been an
easy personal journey for Judge Sotomayor, and there can be little doubt that
she is as tough as nails. However, amidst all the tributes to Judge Sotomayor’s
triumph, one cannot help but think about the conditions that confront the
hundreds of thousands of South Bronx residents whom she left behind.
There is another element of
Sotomayor’s nomination that deserves analysis. Media coverage of the
nomination, and the bulk of the political commentary, liberal and conservative,
approving and hostile, focused on the fact that she would become the first
Hispanic and third woman to take a seat on the highest US court. The premise of
both supporters and detractors was that Sotomayor’s gender and ethnic origins
were of decisive importance in evaluating her nomination and determining her
likely course on the court.
Totally obliterated in this
flood of commentary is the most fundamental social category in American
society: class. Sotomayor will go to the Supreme Court, not as the representative
or advocate of Hispanics, women or the socially disadvantaged more generally,
but as the representative of a definite social class at the top of American
society—the financial aristocracy whose interests she and every other federal
judge, and the entire capitalist state machine, loyally serve and defend.
Only one “mainstream”
bourgeois publication focused on this critical question. That was the Wall Street Journal, whose editorial
page serves as a major voice of the ultra-right—denouncing the Sotomayor nomination
in strident tones—but whose news pages explored her record as a well-paid
commercial litigator and federal judge, on issues of direct interest to big
business, including contract law, employment and property rights.
The newspaper quoted several Wall
Street lawyers describing Sotomayor as a safe choice for corporate America.
“There is no reason for the business community to be concerned,” said one
attorney. Barry Ostrager, a partner at Simpson Thacher LLP who defended a unit
of J.P. Morgan Chase in a lawsuit over fraudulent pricing of initial public
offerings, cited Sotomayor’s role in an appeals court ruling barring the
class-action suit. “That ruling demonstrated that in securities litigation, she
is in the judicial mainstream,” he told the Journal.
Barack Obama is the
culmination of this process. Celebrated as the first African-American
president, he has overseen the greatest handover of resources to the
billionaires and Wall Street speculators in history. In the restructuring of the
auto industry, with ever-escalating demands for cuts in jobs, pay and benefits
for auto workers, he has set the stage for the greatest assault on the working
class since the Reagan administration smashed the PATCO air traffic controllers
strike in 1981 and gave the signal for a nationwide campaign of wage-cutting
and union-busting. In this, Obama demonstrates that the class he serves, not
the color of his skin or his social origins, is the decisive political factor.
The
political development of the American working class requires, first and
foremost, the direct and open discussion of the class realities of American
society. No country in the world is as deeply and intractably divided along
economic lines as the United States, where the top 1 percent of the population
owns 40 percent of the wealth and monopolizes 20 percent of the income. Any
analysis of the political issues facing working people that does not take these
class divisions as the fundamental reality is an exercise in deception and
political stultification.
Patrick
Martin
*
“The
stimulus plan purports to address the deepest economic crisis since the Great
Depression without examining its underlying causes or the social interests that
underlie the crisis. This is no accident, since the fundamental premise of all
of the measures taken in response to the crisis, by Obama no less than Bush, is
the defense of the interests of the financial elite.”
*
Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors
are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG
($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).
*
OBAMA SELECTED LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA
SOLIS TO ADVANCE THE OBAMA AGENDA OF KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED, AND BUY THE
ILLEGALS’ VOTES BY MAKING SURE ILLEGALS GET OUR JOBS! THE EASIEST WAY TO DO
THIS IS TO SABOTAGE LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS. OBAMA, THE
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, THE OBAMA DEPT. of LA RAZA JUSTICE, AND THE LA RAZA DEMS
ARE SABOTAGING E-VERIFY ALL OVER THE NATION!
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Friday, June 5, 2009
Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor faces new questions about her views on group and identity politics... after it became clear she has a long history of making race-and-gender based remarks. We’ll have a special report. Sotomayor’s views on our Second Amendment rights are the
subject of our face off debate tonight.
Friday, June 5, 2009
Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor faces new questions about her views on group and identity politics... after it became clear she has a long history of making race-and-gender based remarks. We’ll have a special report. Sotomayor’s views on our Second Amendment rights are the
subject of our face off debate tonight.
*
From the Desk of
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:
Sotomayor Evasive, Disingenuous During Confirmation HearingsThe eagerly anticipated confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor got underway this week. And how did she do?
Let’s start with Sotomayor’s rambling and constantly shifting explanation for one of her most controversial statements – that she “would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.” This racist remark was made during a speech Sotomayor delivered to students at Cal Berkeley in 2001. The reason it is getting so much attention is that it calls into question Judge Sotomayor’s impartiality – and she made the remark repeatedly through the years. (Judicial Watch addressed this comment and many other troublesome statements and activities by Sotomayor in a letter to Senators Patrick Leahy, D-VT, and Jeff Sessions, R-AL, last week. You can read it by clicking here.)
During the hearing, at first, Sotomayor dismissed the statement as a “rhetorical flourish” that “fell flat.” However, under subsequent questioning Sotomayor attempted to defend her remarks, indicating that it was an attempt to “inspire” her audience. Of course Sotomayor quickly added that the comment has nothing to do with her attitude towards dispensing justice, which she claims is firmly rooted in the rule of law. (Action by the Supreme Court might argue this point, given that the High Court just overturned the decision she helped make in the Ricci racial discrimination matter. Click here for more.)
Sotomayor also tried to justify the comment by comparing it to allegedly similar ones made by Justice Alito and former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. And in another explanation she said her words shouldn’t be taken literally.
“I think she just made it more muddled,” said Senator Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee. In sum, Judge Sotomayor tried to deny the plain meaning of her “wise Latina” statements. This disingenuous approach may pass muster in Washington, but most people would be troubled by her lawyerly evasions.
Can you recall a Supreme Court nominee in recent years that has had to spend so much time defending their impartiality as a judge? I can’t.
On the issue of abortion Sotomayor said that she feels Roe v Wade is “settled law.” According to The Associated Press: “Supreme Court aspirant Sonia Sotomayor said Tuesday that she considers the question of abortion rights is settled precedent and says there is a constitutional right to privacy...Answering a question later from Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Sotomayor said that “all precedents of the Supreme Court I consider settled law…” This doesn’t mean much, as the Supreme Court regularly overturns its precedents.
Judge Sotomayor said she had no idea why one of her former colleagues at the New York law firm Pavia & Harcourt would say, "I can guarantee she'll be for abortion rights." Maybe he knew of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund’s radical pro-abortion agenda when she helped run the organization? But Judge Sotomayor professed to have no clue about the legal positions of her former group, despite the fact that she set the group’s litigation agenda.
Senator Lindsey Graham also initiated a tough, dramatic line of questioning with respect to Sotomayor’s temperament. In fact, Senator Graham flat out asked her: “Do you have a temperament problem?” (Sotomayor has been described as a “bully” on the bench.) Sotomayor attempted to defend herself against the charge but the issue was still left hanging in the hearing room.
Sotomayor’s problem for this hearing was a big one. She has had to defend the indefensible. She did this by reversing course, professing fidelity to the law, disavowing her radical judicial philosophy as described in her many speeches and writings, and by misleading the committee on one some of her more controversial decisions.
The judge went so far as to disavow President Obama’s lawless “empathy” standard for picking judges. Judge Sotomayor said that she would apply the law to the facts. She said, “Judges can’t rely on what is in their heart.”
In the end, she sounded like the most conservative nominee to the Supreme Court by a Democratic president in thirty years. (It is interesting that, even in the age of Obama, liberal jurists must pretend to be conservatives to gain Senate approval. It confirms the victory of conservatives in framing the public policy debate over liberal judicial activism. Even Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court must pretend to reject judicial activism.)
There is no question, given all of her “wise Latina” and other radical statements and her long-term connection to groups such as the far-left Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, that Judge Sotomayor is the wrong judge for a seat on the Supreme Court. I don’t believe her confirmation conversion to “fidelity to the law.”
Unfortunately, Republicans seem resigned to the fact that Judge Sotomayor will be confirmed with little debate, but it’s not too late to change the situation. You must make your voices heard! Even liberal Senator Feinstein (D-CA) admitted this week that she had received calls of concern on the Sotomayor nomination. These calls matter. Call the U.S. Capitol switchboard today at 202-224-3121, and let your senators know your thoughts.
Some in the press have characterized the Sotomayor hearings as “grueling.” I attended them for a bit and I found them interesting – in how a nominee can evade questions, deny her record, and largely control the room in the face of questioning by hapless senators. A well-prepared lawyer like Judge Sotomayor can do these types of hearings in their sleep.
There have been some tough questions for sure, but without an underlying commitment to carefully making the case against this nomination too many of the questions amounted to nothing more than “rhetorical flourishes” that “fall flat.” As a result, Americans may end up with a biased, activist justice on the Supreme Court.
*
VIVA LA RAZA?
Sonia Sotomayor opposes E-Verify
requirement
True to form, she said it was
illegal to make employers e-verify citizen status of new hires.
Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.
Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.
*
Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor
General's Amicus Curiae Brief). Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law
requires all employers in Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the
business licenses of those who hire illegal workers shall be repealed.
From the date of enactment, the Chamber of Commerce and other special interest
groups have been trying to undo it, attacking it through a failed ballot
initiative and also through a lawsuit. Now the Chamber is asking the United
States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria),
and the Obama Administration is weighing in against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco
Chronicle,
June 2, 2010). Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting
Solicitor General Neal Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that
the lower courts were wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration
law expressly preempts any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring
illegal immigrants. Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law,
but “a statute that prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses
suspension and revocation of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate
sanction.” (Solicitor
General's Amicus Curiae Brief, p. 10). This is the administration’s first court
challenge to a state’s authority to act against illegal immigration, and could
be a preview of the battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration
crackdown through SB 1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*
Sotomayor’s record: A judicial
pragmatist and defender of corporate interests
By Don Knowland
17 July 2009
17 July 2009
As
a nominee to the US Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor is reliable defender of
corporate interests, siding with big business, government authority and the
police far more than with the poor, the arrested or the oppressed. With 17
years on the federal courts, the most of any Supreme Court nominee in more than
half a century, she is anything but an unknown quantity.
In
her five years as a federal district court trial judge, Sotomayor issued
hundreds of written decisions. In 12 years on the appellate court, she has been
the principal author of over 150 opinions. She joined in the majority opinion
in over 350 cases.
A
survey of her written decisions reveals a jurist firmly wedded to the bourgeois
mainstream, particularly when business interests are at stake, and not given to
sweeping formulations. The New York Times legal correspondent assigned
to cover the Supreme Court wrote that Sotomayor’s opinions “reveal no larger
vision, seldom appeal to history and consistently avoid quotable language.”
A
Congressional Research Service analysis found that Sotomayor’s rulings could
not be easily categorized in ideological terms, and “showed an adherence to
precedent, an emphasis on the facts of a case, and an avoidance of overstepping
the court’s judicial role.”
According
to one of Sotomayor’s former law clerks, “She is a rule-bound pragmatist-very
geared toward determining what the right answer is and what the law
dictates...” Sotomayor herself has professed to follow a narrow “just the
facts” approach to judicial decision-making, a style described by some as
judicial minimalism.
However,
when important issues arise that affect more fundamental interests of the
ruling elite, such as national security matters or big economic questions,
Sotomayor comes down invariably on the side of the establishment, at the
expense of the majority of society.
A law-and-order judge
As
with most former prosecutors, Sotomayor has a negative if not hostile view of
the rights of those accused of crimes. Encomiums from her former associates at
the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and various New York and national
police organizations were read into the record of her confirmation hearing.
According
to Leroy Frazer Jr., first assistant district attorney in Manhattan and a
former colleague of Sotomayor, she “has contributed greatly to law enforcement
in New York” as a judge. John Siffert, an attorney who taught appellate
advocacy with Sotomayor at New York University School of Law for ten years,
confirms that she is loath to overturn criminal convictions. “She was not
viewed as a pro-defense judge” while she sat as a trial judge, Siffert told the
press.
One
decision Sotomayor authored as an appellate judge upheld the use of evidence
police seized mistakenly, thinking they had a warrant. The Supreme Court’s
five-justice conservative bloc came to the same conclusion this year, over the
dissent of the court’s four moderate justices. Jeffrey Fisher, a Stanford Law
School professor who was on the losing side of the January Supreme Court
decision, said Judge Sotomayor’s ruling displayed her “willingness to give
police the benefit of the doubt.”
One
case decided by Sotomayor as an appellate judge involved the timeliness of the habeas
corpus petition filed by a prisoner convicted of murder and rape. Congress
had only recently passed President Bill Clinton’s Anti-Terrorism-Effective
Death Penalty Act, which imposed a one-year time limit on such petitions.
Confusion existed in the federal courts regarding how the new law would be
applied to pending cases. Following the advice of a court clerk, the
defendant’s attorney mailed in rather than filed the appeal the day it was due.
Sotomayor
and her colleagues on the case refused to consider the petition, ruling that it
was untimely and that its lateness was not excusable. They also summarily
brushed off the defendant’s claim to innocence, even though guilt was based on
a confession the police coerced when the defendant was 17. The defendant then
spent six more years in jail before DNA testing conclusively established his
innocence.
Capital and labor
While
frequently dissenting against reactionary rulings on issues involving
democratic rights, the four-justice moderate bloc on the Supreme Court has
increasingly tended to join the court’s right wing in favoring big business
over workers and consumers where their economic interests are explicitly
counterposed, as in cases involving punitive damage awards against giant
corporations.
Sotomayor
is unlikely to buck that trend. She currently sits in the Second Circuit Court
of Appeals, which hears the most important appeals affecting Wall Street and
the financial industry. That court’s 2006 decision strongly favored Wall Street
in a group of cases involving thousands of investors suing dozens of the
largest banks and investment houses, including Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs,
Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and the now
defunct Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. The plaintiffs charged massive fraud
involving manipulation of the market for initial public offerings of company
shares. Such schemes played a major role in inflating the dot.com and telecom
bubbles.
As
a practical matter, the plaintiffs in the case could proceed only if they could
band together for class actions. The appellate ruling dismissed the cases on
the basis that questions as to what information and assurances individual
plaintiffs relied on in purchasing shares precluded finding sufficient
commonality to permit the cases to proceed on a class action basis. This
amounted to an extremely strained reading of the rules regarding class action
suits and reduced the value of the plaintiffs’ recovery by many billions of
dollars.
Sotomayor’s
most well known decision as a district court judge involved her issuing an
injunction in 1995 against baseball team owners during the longest strike in
baseball history, which followed an owner lock-out of players. Sotomayor ruled
that the National Relations Labor Board had cause to believe that baseball
owners committed unfair labor practices by eliminating free agency and salary
arbitration provisions of the expired collective bargaining agreement. She
ordered the owners to bargain in good faith on those issues. The strike then
ended.
As
an appellate judge, Sotomayor has favored working class plaintiffs mainly in
disability cases. In one case, Sotomayor ruled that New York did not
sufficiently accommodate a dyslexic applicant taking the bar examination.
Sotomayor
dissented in a 2003 case brought by the federal Equal Opportunity Employment
Commission against a major trucking company relating to discrimination against
drivers who took medication that the company believed impaired driving. Federal
regulations provide that discrimination occurs if a company perceives that a
worker or workers have an impairment as to a “class of jobs” compared to
average persons of comparable skill, as opposed to single jobs. The majority
dismissed the case, saying that the evidence showed only that the employer
perceived the drivers as incapable of long-distance, stressful driving jobs.
Sotomayor argued that there was sufficient evidence that the employer perceived
the impairment to extend to any truck driving jobs, an entire “class of jobs,”
such that the case should proceed to trial.
Constitutional rights
Outside
of the criminal case context, Sotomayor has shown some favor toward suits
challenging violation of the Fourth Amendment probable cause and warrant
requirements and due process rights.
In
a 2002 case, Sotomayor wrote that New York City’s policy of seizing and then keeping
for an extended period of time, sometimes for years, vehicles used by alleged
drunk drivers or in other misdemeanor crimes violated the due process clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
The
City’s ordinance permitted it to file a civil case seeking the forfeiture of
vehicles of those found guilty. But the forfeiture cases were often deferred
for many months or even years, while the underlying criminal cases were
resolved. Sotomayor’s ruling required a meaningful hearing at a meaningful time
as to whether the vehicle’s owner could recover it. Her decision reversed the
trial court ruling of then-District Judge Michael Mukasey, who later became
George Bush’s last attorney general.
In
a case seeking damages for a house search based on a flawed warrant, Sotomayor
dissented in order to challenge the formulation used by the majority to define
when a police officer is entitled to “qualified immunity” from suit for such a
violation. The Supreme Court excuses an officer from such constitutional violations
unless the law is so clear that an objectively reasonable officer could not
believe his conduct is lawful. Sotomayor objected to her circuit’s formulation
of this defense that gave police officers extra latitude in meeting that
standard.
Sotomayor
wrote a 2006 opinion approving suspicionless searches of passenger carry-on
luggage and car trunks before boarding a ferry, based on the government’s
purported interest in deterring terrorist attacks on large vessels engaged in
mass transportation. She joined another decision that struck down a portion of
the Patriot Act relating to disclosure of National Security Letters on First
Amendment grounds.
In
a 2002 case, Sotomayor authored an opinion that gave prison officials wide
latitude to infringe prisoner First Amendment rights by withholding incoming
mail if they could articulate some security justification for such action. In
other cases, Sotomayor has granted latitude to prisoners in exercising
religious rights.
Wsws.org…
get on their free daily emails for updates on corporate rape and pillage
*
Lou Dobbs
Tonight
Thursday, July 9, 2009
And Harvard economics professor JEFFREY MIRON will weigh in on the state of the U.S. economy—and why the only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination.
*Thursday, July 9, 2009
And Harvard economics professor JEFFREY MIRON will weigh in on the state of the U.S. economy—and why the only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination.
HECTOR TOBAR IS THE L.A. TIMES LA RAZA
SUPREMACIST
From the Los
Angeles Times
Latina lawyer learned law at
Harvard, gains wisdom in Compton ( COMPTON, MEX GANGLAND!)
Attorney Luz Herrera hopes that Sonia Sotomayor, if
confirmed to the Supreme Court, can get across the message that the Latino
experience is already 'a part of the fabric of U.S. society.'
Hector Tobar
June 2, 2009
I made a pilgrimage to Compton last week in search of wisdom, to a little storefront with bars over the windows and a liquor-grocer next door.
Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court nominee, set me off on this quest with her oft-repeated observation that "a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male . . . "
Southern California is home, arguably, to more wise Latinas than any other place in the United States. The only Latina in Obama's cabinet (Labor Secretary Hilda Solis) is from here. And I personally know dozens more, starting with my mother, my wife, my mother-in-law and assorted professors, activists and sharp-minded stay-at-home moms.
But Judge Sotomayor was referring, specifically, to the law. So I thought I should go find a smart Latina attorney and ask her if she thought that was true. Does American jurisprudence look different from a Latina woman's eyes, and if so, what does she see in the United States that a wise "white male" does not?
Until recently, Luz Herrera, 36, ran a solo law practice in Compton. She was born in Tijuana to Mexican parents and raised in heavily Latino neighborhoods of unincorporated West Whittier. But she'll be the first to tell you that her background alone didn't make her wise. Neither, she says, did Harvard Law School, from which she graduated in 1999.
"I learned to think like a lawyer there," she said of Harvard. "I learned how to be a lawyer here. That's what Compton gave me."
What Sotomayor can bring to American justice, Herrera told me, is something that Herrera longs for every day: the understanding that the Latino experience is already "a part of the fabric of U.S. society" and that this truth should be reflected in our legal system. PART OF THE FABRIC WE NEED TO RID OURSELVES OF!!!!
*
June 2, 2009
I made a pilgrimage to Compton last week in search of wisdom, to a little storefront with bars over the windows and a liquor-grocer next door.
Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court nominee, set me off on this quest with her oft-repeated observation that "a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male . . . "
Southern California is home, arguably, to more wise Latinas than any other place in the United States. The only Latina in Obama's cabinet (Labor Secretary Hilda Solis) is from here. And I personally know dozens more, starting with my mother, my wife, my mother-in-law and assorted professors, activists and sharp-minded stay-at-home moms.
But Judge Sotomayor was referring, specifically, to the law. So I thought I should go find a smart Latina attorney and ask her if she thought that was true. Does American jurisprudence look different from a Latina woman's eyes, and if so, what does she see in the United States that a wise "white male" does not?
Until recently, Luz Herrera, 36, ran a solo law practice in Compton. She was born in Tijuana to Mexican parents and raised in heavily Latino neighborhoods of unincorporated West Whittier. But she'll be the first to tell you that her background alone didn't make her wise. Neither, she says, did Harvard Law School, from which she graduated in 1999.
"I learned to think like a lawyer there," she said of Harvard. "I learned how to be a lawyer here. That's what Compton gave me."
What Sotomayor can bring to American justice, Herrera told me, is something that Herrera longs for every day: the understanding that the Latino experience is already "a part of the fabric of U.S. society" and that this truth should be reflected in our legal system. PART OF THE FABRIC WE NEED TO RID OURSELVES OF!!!!
*
From the Los Angeles Times
Speeches reveal more about Sotomayor's thoughts on race
The Senate Judiciary Committee receives a file on the
Supreme Court nominee's life from Princeton onward. She has spoken on other
occasions of ethnic identity and her hopes about 'wise Latina' judges.
By
David G. Savage
June 5, 2009
Reporting from Washington — Judge Sonia Sotomayor, already facing controversy for a 2001 speech on the virtue of having "a wise Latina" as a judge, made similar comments in a series of speeches released Thursday.
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white male, she said on several occasions.
Since her nomination, conservative activists have cited the comment as evidence that she would rule based on her ethnic identity.
President Obama sought to defuse the criticism last week. "I'm sure she would have restated it," he said, adding that she was "simply saying that her life experience will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through."
The speeches were among a thick file, including court opinions and financial documents, that the White House sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. They cover 35 years of Sotomayor's life, from her days as a Princeton student through her time as a prosecutor, corporate lawyer, trial judge and appeals court judge.
She reported a net worth of $740,000, consisting mostly of her $1.1-million condominium in New York City. She has a $381,000 mortgage and about $31,000 in the bank. She reported owning no stocks, bonds or mutual funds.
She said that White House Counsel Gregory Craig first contacted her about the Supreme Court vacancy on April 27 -- five days before Justice David H. Souter publicly announced he was retiring.
In a speech at Princeton in 1996, she said: "I began a lifelong commitment to identifying myself as a Latina" while at Princeton, "taking pride in being Hispanic, and in recognizing my obligation to help my community reach its fullest potential in this society."
She added: "I underscore that in saying this I am not promoting ethnic segregation. I am promoting just the opposite: an ethnic identity and pride which impels us to work with others in the larger society to achieve advancement for the people of our cultures."
"America has a deeply confused image of itself that is a perpetual source of tension," she said at a 2006 gathering of Latino students at Yale Law School. "We are a nation that takes pride in our ethnic diversity, recognizing its importance in shaping our society and in adding richness to its existence. Yet we simultaneously insist that we can and must function and live in a race- and colorblind way that ignores those very differences that in other contexts we laud."
She said that the Supreme Court was "just as fractured" as society over the role of race in public decisions, such as college affirmative action.
"This tension leads many of us to struggle with maintaining and promoting our cultural and ethnic identities in a society that is often ambivalent about to how to deal with its differences," she said.
Sotomayor repeated that she disagreed with a comment attributed to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor that "a wise old man and a wise old woman reach the same conclusion" in deciding cases. "I'm not so sure that I agree with the statement," she said at Seton Hall Law in 2003. "I would hope a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion."
Two years earlier, at the UC Berkeley law school, she said she hoped the "wise Latina" would reach "a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
June 5, 2009
Reporting from Washington — Judge Sonia Sotomayor, already facing controversy for a 2001 speech on the virtue of having "a wise Latina" as a judge, made similar comments in a series of speeches released Thursday.
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white male, she said on several occasions.
Since her nomination, conservative activists have cited the comment as evidence that she would rule based on her ethnic identity.
President Obama sought to defuse the criticism last week. "I'm sure she would have restated it," he said, adding that she was "simply saying that her life experience will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through."
The speeches were among a thick file, including court opinions and financial documents, that the White House sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. They cover 35 years of Sotomayor's life, from her days as a Princeton student through her time as a prosecutor, corporate lawyer, trial judge and appeals court judge.
She reported a net worth of $740,000, consisting mostly of her $1.1-million condominium in New York City. She has a $381,000 mortgage and about $31,000 in the bank. She reported owning no stocks, bonds or mutual funds.
She said that White House Counsel Gregory Craig first contacted her about the Supreme Court vacancy on April 27 -- five days before Justice David H. Souter publicly announced he was retiring.
In a speech at Princeton in 1996, she said: "I began a lifelong commitment to identifying myself as a Latina" while at Princeton, "taking pride in being Hispanic, and in recognizing my obligation to help my community reach its fullest potential in this society."
She added: "I underscore that in saying this I am not promoting ethnic segregation. I am promoting just the opposite: an ethnic identity and pride which impels us to work with others in the larger society to achieve advancement for the people of our cultures."
"America has a deeply confused image of itself that is a perpetual source of tension," she said at a 2006 gathering of Latino students at Yale Law School. "We are a nation that takes pride in our ethnic diversity, recognizing its importance in shaping our society and in adding richness to its existence. Yet we simultaneously insist that we can and must function and live in a race- and colorblind way that ignores those very differences that in other contexts we laud."
She said that the Supreme Court was "just as fractured" as society over the role of race in public decisions, such as college affirmative action.
"This tension leads many of us to struggle with maintaining and promoting our cultural and ethnic identities in a society that is often ambivalent about to how to deal with its differences," she said.
Sotomayor repeated that she disagreed with a comment attributed to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor that "a wise old man and a wise old woman reach the same conclusion" in deciding cases. "I'm not so sure that I agree with the statement," she said at Seton Hall Law in 2003. "I would hope a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion."
Two years earlier, at the UC Berkeley law school, she said she hoped the "wise Latina" would reach "a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
*
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A
POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE HALF OF ALL JOBS ARE HELD BY
ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. TO BLOCK THE USE OF E-VERIFY,
THE LA RAZA CONTROLLED STATE LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW SIGNED BY LA RAZA DEM
JERRY BROWN MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!!! THIS SAME COUNTY
PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, AND HAS A TAX-FREE
MEXICAN ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE MORE THAN $2 BILLION PER YEAR!
VIVA LA RAZA?
OBAMA’S AMERICA: Open & Undefended Borders!
“What we're seeing is our
Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them.
Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens
now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal
alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may
obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your
children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
* Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have
dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released
Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and
convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal
2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
(Article)
*
OBAMA
AND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
*
*
*
*
*
No comments:
Post a Comment