MEXICANS GIVE UP JOBS TO HOP OUR
BORDERS FOR OURS. ALONG WITH OUR JOB THE GET “FREE” MEDICAL, “FREE” EDUCATION,
“FREE” DREAM ACTS, AND LIVE IN THE MEX TAX-FREE UNDERGROUND ECONOMY. NEXT TO
DRUGS, MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS ARE POVERTY, VIOLENCE, CRIMINALS, AND ANCHOR
BABY BREEDERS!
CA IS A STATE IN MELTDOWN DUE TO THE CORRUPTION OF THE
LIFER-POLITICIANS LIKE FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, WAXMAN, LOFGREN and the rise
of the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA NOW SENDING LA RAZA SUPREMACIST REPS.
XAVIER BECERRA, JOE BACA, INFAMOUS RACIST SISTER LINDA AND LORETTA SANCHEZ and
GRACE NAPOLITANO.
THEY PUSH OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, NO LEGAL NEED APPLY, NO
E-VERIFY, DREAM ACTS NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED FOR, LAWSUITS AGAINST AMERICAN STATES
LIKE ARIZONA ATTEMPTING TO PUSH BACK THE LA RAZA INVASION, AND AMNESTY… or
continued NON-ENFORCEMENT.
LA RAZA SUPREMACY:
THE LA RAZA FACTION (illegals) OF CA STATE LEGISLATURE JUST PASSED A
LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY!!!
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN MEX-GANG
INFESTED LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE 90% OF THE SERVICE SECTOR and CONSTRUCTION
JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THIS SAME COUNTY PUTS
OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS (source: JUDICIAL WATCH), AND
HAS A TAX-FREE MEXICAN UNDERGROUND ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $2
BILLION PER YEAR! VIVA LA RAZA?
LOS ANGELES ANCHOR BABY WELFARE PROGRAM:THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts
CHRISTIAN
SCIENCE MONITOR
Why the new jobs go to immigrants
By David R. Francis
Wall Street
cheered and stock prices rose when the US Labor Department announced last
Friday that employers had expanded their payrolls by 262,000 positions in
February.
But it
wasn't entirely good news. The statisticians also indicated that the share of
the adult population holding jobs had slipped slightly from January to 62.3
percent. That's now two full percentage points below the level in the
brief recession that began in March 2001.
Why the
apparent contradiction? Reasons abound: population growth, rising retirements.
But one factor that gets little attention is immigration.
In the past
four years, the number of immigrants into the US, legal and illegal, has
closely matched the number of new jobs. That suggests newcomers have, in
effect, snapped up all of the new jobs.
"There
has been no net job gain for natives," says Andrew Sum, an economist at
Northeastern University.
In the
US, President Bush calls for giving millions of illegal immigrants a kind of
guest-worker status as a legal path to US citizenship. So far, no specific
legislation to implement his suggestion has been put before Congress.
Meanwhile,
US border patrols spend millions of dollars a year trying to keep illegals out.
And yet, they keep coming, evidently little discouraged by recession or the
9/11 attacks. In the past four years alone, the number of immigrants ran some
2.5 million to 3 million, of which about half were illegal.
They
come for jobs, of course. And the Bush administration makes barely any effort
to enforce current law. In 2003, a total of 13 employers were fined for hiring
undocumented employees.
In fact,
neither Republicans nor Democrats have promoted enforcement of immigration law
prohibiting the hiring of illegal immigrants, says Mr. Sum, head of
Northeastern's Center for Labor Market Studies.
What
employers really want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage
costs, experts say.
*
Most Mexican Immigrants in New Study Gave Up Jobs to Take Their Chances
in U.S.
By NINA BERNSTEIN New York Times
A report about the work lives of
recent Mexican immigrants in seven cities across the United States suggests
that they typically traded jobs in Mexico for the prospect of work here, despite serious bouts of
unemployment, job instability and poor wages.
The report, released Tuesday by
the Pew Hispanic Center, was based on surveys of nearly 5,000 Mexicans, most of
them here illegally.
Those surveyed were seeking
identity documents at Mexican consulates in New York, Atlanta and Raleigh,
N.C., where recent arrivals have gravitated toward construction, hotel and
restaurant jobs, and in Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Fresno, Calif., where
they have been more likely to work in agriculture and manufacturing.
Unlike the stereotype of jobless
Mexicans heading north, most of the immigrants had been employed in Mexico, the
report found.
Once in the United States, they
soon found that their illegal status was no barrier to being hired here. And
though the jobs they landed, typically with help from relatives, were often
unstable and their median earnings only $300 a week, that was enough to keep
drawing newcomers because wages here far exceeded those in Mexico.
"We're getting a peek at a
segment of the U.S. labor force that is large, that is growing by illegal
migration, and that is bringing an entirely new set of issues into the U.S.
labor market," said Rakesh Kochhar, associate director for research at the
Pew Hispanic Center and author of the study.
The report suggested that policies
intended to reduce migration pressures by improving the Mexican economy would
have to look beyond employment to wages and perceptions of opportunity.
The survey found that the most
recent to arrive were more likely to have worked in construction or commerce,
rather than agriculture, in Mexico. Only 5 percent had been unemployed there;
they were "drawn not from the fringes, but from the heart of Mexico's
labor force," the report said.
After a difficult transition in
their first six months in the United States - about 15 percent of the
respondents said they did not work during that time - the rate of unemployment
plummeted, to an average of 5 percent.
But in one of the most striking
findings, 38 percent reported an unemployment spell lasting a month or more in
the previous year, regardless of their location, legal status or length of time
in the United States.
"These are workers with no
safety net," Mr. Kochhar said. "The long-run implication is a
generation of workers without health or pension benefits, without any
meaningful asset accumulation."
On the other hand, Mr. Kochhar and
Roberto Suro, director of the Pew Hispanic Center, said the flexibility of this
work force was a boon to certain industries like home construction, an
important part of the nation's economic growth since the last recession.
Among respondents to the survey,
those who settled in Atlanta and Dallas were the best off, with 56 percent in
each city receiving a weekly wage higher than the $300-a-week median. The worst
off were in Fresno, where more than half of the survey respondents worked in
agriculture and 60 percent reported earning less than $300 a week. The lowest
wages were reported by women, people who spoke little or no English, and those
without identification.
To some scholars of immigration,
the report underlines the lack of incentives for employers to turn to a guest
worker program like the one proposed by President Bush because their needs are
met cheaply by illegal workers - and all without paperwork or long-term
commitment.
Guest workers might instead appeal
to corporations like Wal-Mart, the scholars said, where service jobs are now
the target of union organizing drives.
"You can't plausibly argue
that immigrant-dominated sectors have a labor shortage," said Robert
Courtney Smith, a sociologist and author of "Mexican New York:
Transnational Lives of New Immigrants." Instead, he said, the report and
evidence of falling wages among Mexican immigrants over time point to an
oversupply of vulnerable workers competing with each other.
But Brendan Flanagan, a spokesman
for the National Restaurant Association, which supports a guest worker program,
disagreed. "In many places it is difficult to fill jobs with domestic
workers," Mr. Flanagan said. "We've seen a simple lack of applicants,
regardless of what wage is offered."
Although the survey, conducted
from July 2004 to January 2005, was not random or weighted to represent all
Mexican immigrants, it offers a close look at a usually elusive population.
Those surveyed were not questioned
directly about their immigration status, but they were asked whether they had
any photo identification issued by a government agency in the United States.
Slightly more than half over all, and 75 percent in New York, said they did
not.
The migration is part of a historic
restructuring of the Mexican economy comparable to America's industrial
revolution, said Kathleen Newland, director of the Migration Policy Institute,
a research organization based in Washington.
The institute released its own
report on Tuesday, arguing that border enforcement efforts have failed.
Workplace enforcement, which has been neglected, would be a crucial part of
making a guest worker program successful.
For now, Mexicans keep arriving
illegally.
"It doesn't matter if it's
winter," said Ricardo Cortes, 23, a construction worker waiting for a
friend outside the Mexican consulate in New York on Tuesday. "People are
still coming because there's no money over there."
*
HERE’S HOW NO E-VERIFY BREAKS
DOWN:
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
CA MAKES E-VERIFY
ILLEGAL! COURTESY THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California...
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California...
You have 2 families..."Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.
"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted...."Jose Illegal" also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Joe Legal...$25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, $52,000 per year
Now take 30% away for state and federal tax
Joe Legal now has $31,231.00
Jose Illegal...$15.00 per hour x 40 hours $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year
Jose Illegal pays no taxes...
Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage
$1000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $19,231.00
Jose Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal makes too much money is not eligible for Food Stamps or welfare
Joe Legal pays for food
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $ 7,231.00
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for Food Stamps and Welfare
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays rent of
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal is now in the hole... minus (-) $4,769.00
Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy
Jose Illegal pays rent
$500.00 per month
$6,000.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $25,200.00
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch.
Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Don't vote/support any politician that supports illegal aliens...
Its WAY PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
*
Is Illegal
Immigration Moral?
By
Victor Davis Hanson
11/25/2010
We know illegal immigration is no
longer really unlawful, but is it moral?
Usually Americans debate the fiscal
costs of illegal immigration. Supporters of open borders rightly remind us that
illegal immigrants pay sales taxes. Often their payroll-tax contributions are
not later tapped by Social Security payouts.
Opponents counter that illegal
immigrants are more likely to end up on state assistance, are less likely to
report cash income, and cost the state more through the duplicate issuing of
services and documents in both English and Spanish. Such to-and-fro talking
points are endless.
So is the debate over beneficiaries
of illegal immigration. Are profit-minded employers villains who want cheap
labor in lieu of hiring more expensive Americans? Or is the culprit a cynical
Mexican government that counts on billions of dollars in remittances from its
expatriate poor that it otherwise ignored?
Or is the engine that drives illegal
immigration the American middle class? Why should millions of suburbanites assume
that, like 18th-century French aristocrats, they should have imported labor to
clean their homes, manicure their lawns and watch over their kids?
Or is the catalyst the
self-interested professional Latino lobby in politics and academia that sees a
steady stream of impoverished Latin American nationals as a permanent
victimized constituency, empowering and showcasing elite self-appointed
spokesmen such as themselves?
Or is the real advocate the
Democratic Party that wishes to remake the electoral map of the American
Southwest by ensuring larger future pools of natural supporters? Again, the
debate over who benefits and why is never-ending.
But what is often left out of the
equation is the moral dimension of illegal immigration. We see the issue too often
reduced to caricature, involving a noble, impoverished victim without much free
will and subject to cosmic forces of sinister oppression. But everyone makes
free choices that affect others. So ponder the ethics of a guest arriving in a
host country knowingly against its sovereign protocols and laws.
First, there is the larger effect on
the sanctity of a legal system. If a guest ignores the law -- and thereby often
must keep breaking more laws -- should citizens also have the right to
similarly pick and choose which statutes they find worthy of honoring and which
are too bothersome? Once it is deemed moral for the impoverished to cross a
border without a passport, could not the same arguments of social justice be
used for the poor of any status not to report earned income or even file a 1040
form?
Second, what is the effect of mass
illegal immigration on impoverished U.S. citizens? Does anyone care? When 10
million to 15 million aliens are here illegally, where is the leverage for the
American working poor to bargain with employers? If it is deemed ethical to
grant in-state tuition discounts to illegal-immigrant students, is it equally
ethical to charge three times as much for out-of-state, financially needy
American students -- whose federal government usually offers billions to
subsidize state colleges and universities? If foreign nationals are afforded
more entitlements, are there fewer for U.S. citizens?
Third, consider the moral
ramifications on legal immigration -- the traditional great strength of the
American nation. What are we to tell the legal immigrant from Oaxaca who got a
green card at some cost and trouble, or who, once legally in the United States,
went through the lengthy and expensive process of acquiring citizenship? Was he
a dupe to dutifully follow our laws?
And given the current precedent, if
a million soon-to-be-impoverished Greeks, 2 million fleeing North Koreans, or 5
million starving Somalis were to enter the United States illegally and en
masse, could anyone object to their unlawful entry and residence? If so, on
what legal, practical or moral grounds?
Fourth, examine the morality of
remittances. It is deemed noble to send billions of dollars back to families
and friends struggling in Latin America. But how is such a considerable loss of
income made up? Are American taxpayers supposed to step in to subsidize
increased social services so that illegal immigrants can afford to send billions
of dollars back across the border? What is the morality of that equation in
times of recession? Shouldn't illegal immigrants at least try to buy health
insurance before sending cash back to Mexico?
The debate over illegal immigration
is too often confined to costs and benefits. But ultimately it is a complicated
moral issue -- and one often ignored by all too many moralists.
Victor Davis Hanson
Victor
Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford
University, and a recipient of the 2007 National Humanities Medal.
*
JUDICIAL WATCH
SANCTUARY COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS
County Spends $600 Mil On
Welfare For Illegal Immigrants
Last Updated: Thu, 03/11/2010 - 3:14pm
For the second consecutive year taxpayers in a
single U.S. county will dish out more than half a billion dollars just to cover
the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants.
Los Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a dire financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens. In January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants collected more than $50 million in welfare benefits. At that rate the cash-strapped county will pay around $600 million this year to provide illegal aliens’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare perks.
The exorbitant figure, revealed this week by a
county supervisor, doesn’t even include the enormous cost of educating,
medically treating or incarcerating illegal aliens in the sprawling county of
about 10 million residents. Los Angeles County annually spends more than $1
billion for those combined services, including $500 million for healthcare and
$350 million for public safety.
About a quarter of the county’s welfare and food
stamp issuances go to parents who reside in the United States illegally and
collect benefits for their anchor babies, according to the figures from the
county’s Department of Social Services. In 2009 the tab ran $570 million and
this year’s figure is expected to increase by several million dollars.
Illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic
impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county supervisor
(Michael Antonovich) who revealed the information has said. The former fifth-grade
history teacher has repeatedly come under fire from his liberal counterparts
for publicizing statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has
had on the region. Antonovich, who has served on the board for nearly three
decades, represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the size of
Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.
His district is simply a snippet of a larger crisis. Nationwide, Americans pay around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare benefits that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in public schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC) for low-income women and their children. Tens of billions more are spent on other social services, medical care, public education and legal costs such as incarceration and public defenders.
*
Anchor Babies Grab One Quarter of Welfare
Dollars in LA Co
The anchor baby scam has proven lucrative for illegal aliens in Los Angeles County, at considerable cost to our own poor and downtrodden legal citizenry.
The numbers show that more than $50 million in CalWORKS benefits and food stamps for January went to children born in the United States whose parents are in the country without documentation. This represents approximately 23 percent of the total benefits under the state welfare and food stamp programs, Antonovich said.
"When you add this to $350 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for health care, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county taxpayers far exceeds $1 billion a year -- not including the millions of dollars for education," Antonovich said.
I love children and I'm all for compassion -- smart, teach-them-to-fish compassion. But when laws, the Constitution, and enforcement allow illegal aliens (the operative word here being "illegal") to insinuate themselves into our nation and bleed us of our precious financial resources, then laws, the Constitution and enforcement need to be changed.
ANCHOR BABIES BORN IN OUR BORDERS ARE STILL CITIZENS OF MEXICO!
"Remember
187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens --
was the last gasp of white America in California." ---Art Torres, Chairman
of the California Democratic Party
Anchor Baby Power
La Voz de Aztlan has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de Aztlan believes that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year.
The video below depicts the many faces of the "Anchor Baby Generation". The video includes a fascinating segment showing a group of elementary school children in Santa Ana, California confronting the Minutemen vigilantes. The video ends with a now famous statement by Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez of the University of Texas at Austin.
http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY
No comments:
Post a Comment