No president in history has worked harder
to put illegals in our jobs than Barack Obama!
His SEC. of LABOR is LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
HILDA SOLIS.
BUT FOR BLACK AMERICANS…..? NADA!
Old Obama acquaintance voices South Side’s
disillusionment with his former ally
By Michael Leahy, Published: August 16
CHICAGO — He still walks
the same streets here as his old acquaintance Barack Obama once did. That is
about all they have in common anymore. At 50, Chicago activist Mark Allen lives
with his parents, barely able to pay his bills. The head of a small, community-assistance
organization called Black Wall Street Chicago,
Allen regards his personal survival alone as a small victory, grateful he can
pay the rent on his modest office space, aware he is doing better than many on
this city’s restive South Side.
“Things haven’t gone the
way we’d hoped after Barack got elected,” he says. Surveys place unemployment
rates above 25 percent here, and indications are that South Side residents such
as Allen aren’t nearly as passionate about the 2012 election as they were
during Obama’s trailblazing 2008 campaign.
Historically, community
organizers such as Allen have wielded outsize influence in the black-majority
neighborhoods of the South Side, with none better known than Obama, who
directed a group called the Developing Communities Project for three years
during the 1980s. But old bonds between the two have frayed. Allen, who as a
member of another group worked on community issues with Obama during their organizing
days, has grown frustrated with his former ally in the Oval Office.
Obama’s much ballyhooed
2009 stimulus package has failed to touch ordinary South Side residents, says
Allen, who has reached out to Obama administration officials, including fellow
Chicagoan and prominent White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, to express his
dismay. He wants red tape cut, and he wants to see more business loans for the
area and more jobs for local residents on construction and infrastructure
projects.
Allen, who views the South
Side’s pain as common to U.S. inner cities, also offers a political warning for
Obama’s campaign strategists. The disillusionment of once fierce Obama
admirers, he suggests, may hamper the president’s reelection chances by subtly
dampening black voter turnout.
“His people should’ve done
something more about it by now,” he says. “But that’s Barack’s problem, not
mine.”
Besides, he couldn’t care
less about politics at the moment, he adds. It explains why he is hurrying past
a portrait of Obama and out of his office. He steps onto the streets of the
largely African American community of Bronzeville, which occupies a special
place in the South Side psyche. Bronzeville was a jewel during the first half
of the 20th century, when black-owned businesses accounted for a thriving
commercial district, and a vibrant nightlife sparkling with renowned jazz clubs
drew legendary headliners, including Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington. The
“Black Wall Street,” residents regularly called the community then, which inspired
the name Allen embraced for his organization. Nowadays, the glamorous clubs and
bustling businesses are almost all gone.
Although some new smaller
clubs and a cultural center stand nearby, jobs are as scarce as ever. The place
evokes the gritty despair famously memorialized during the last century in
Gwendolyn Brooks’s first collection of poems, “A Street in Bronzeville.”
At this moment, men down the street, near an “L” train stop, are furtively
plying their street trades. Standing on a street corner, a quiet Allen is
taking in the scene when someone howls his name.
He wheels around to see a
short man in a sweat-streaked tank top and torn jeans. He warily looks him
over.
“Allen?” the man yells.
“You Allen, right? It’s me, man. It’s Shorty.”
Allen languidly nods. “Hey,
man.” He leans forward and taps 44-year-old William “Shorty” Strand on the
shoulder. The two haven’t seen each other in about 20 years, not since they
worked together at the same activist organization. Allen is thinking that this
man with the hooded eyes and thin silver whiskers looks like a worn-down man at
midlife.
“You know how it is, man,”
Shorty says. “I could use a few dollars.”
“Don’t stretch me out,
Shorty,” Allen says, reluctant to hand over any money, given how thin his own
wallet has been stretched. He gives him two bucks anyway.
“I need some work,” Shorty
says, explaining that he has been doing odd jobs, lawn work and landscaping
mostly. He has been sleeping at the apartment of some friends. He is hanging
on, but just barely. “I need a job,” he repeats, more urgently.
Allen says he’ll keep his
ears open. As a grateful Shorty trudges off, Allen mutters, “Where’s the
stimulus for a guy like Shorty?”
It is a frustrated
reference to the Obama administration’s
$800 billion stimulus package, which has awarded
$11.9 billion to Illinois’s public and private sectors since early 2009,
according to administration statistics, and created jobs for about 3,900
Illinoisans in the last quarter alone. But not for many South Siders, Allen
says.
“We haven’t seen much of
the stimulus trickle down to our people here,” he says. “Sure, you see the
signs saying that some road or construction project is being done near here
with stimulus funds. But when you look at the people working on them . . . you see one or two community people maybe, like the guy who holds
the ‘drive slowly’ sign for the [motorists] passing by.”
It is a common complaint
among local activists and community leaders. South Side critics point to road
and construction crews that are overwhelmingly white and from outside their
neighborhoods. This summer, Bobby L. Rush (D), a South Side congressman
probably best known for having defeated an upstart Obama in a congressional
primary 12 years ago, balked at a $133 million rail project, financed in
substantial part by stimulus funds, after learning that the only jobs committed
to local African Americans had stemmed from a $120,000 security contract. Even
after Rush recently said that he had negotiated an agreement with the project’s
principal contractor on employment opportunities for South Side residents,
local activists were roundly skeptical, insisting nothing had been guaranteed,
as Rush had yet to release a written agreement.
Meanwhile, administration
defenders point out that the stimulus law was never chiefly designed as an
infrastructure program. Most of the stimulus money has gone to the kinds of
initiatives principally designed to stoke consumer demand, bolster the social
safety net and preserve existing jobs: tax credits for lower- and middle-income
families, more public education funding, additional assistance to Medicaid.
Asked about the South
Side’s struggles amid the stimulus program, the White House referred to modest
economic gains in the community and nationally.
“When President Obama took
office, the economy was losing almost a million private sector jobs per month,”
said Matt Lehrich, a White House spokesman. “. . . While much work remains, we now have 29 straight
months of private-sector job creation.” The Recovery Act, Lehrich added, was
“designed to have maximum economic impact and benefit those who needed it most,
even if that meant folks didn’t always realize the help they were getting was
from the Recovery Act.”
Allen views the South
Side’s jobless and its struggling entrepreneurs as having been overlooked. “The
president tells people, ‘We’re trying to ease the barriers,’ ” Allen says.
“But I’d say to Barack: People around places like this elected you on one
promise, to bring hope and change to a community like this. Look around. . . . What’s really changed?”
Allen recalls that he had
gone around the nearby community of Roseland with Obama during their community
organizing days, when Allen worked for Operation PUSH, a Chicago-based group
led by the Rev. Jesse Jackson. The two young activists lobbied for more
community input at local meetings, recounts Allen, a recollection that prompted
a White House spokesperson to say that it is likely the two were at some
meetings together. “He was smart, and he was impatient with red tape,” Allen
recalls of the young Obama. “I liked the community organizer Obama better than
President Obama. . . . Democrats say Barack has got 90 percent or
whatever of the black vote wrapped up. What they don’t tell you is it’s 90
percent of those who actually come out and vote. . . . What if it’s 90 percent of just 30 or 40 percent who vote?”
With no great hope that
Washington will provide additional help anytime soon, Allen’s organization is
principally focused on aiding small-business owners struggling to get ventures
off the ground. His organization makes available office space, in the form of
cubicles, for budding entrepreneurs who are looking for capital, workers and
affordable places to house businesses. He assists the dreamers in the sometimes
confounding process of applying for commercial loans and government grants, and
he must occasionally guide them through the frustrations of credit repair.
Always, he says, he is looking to pair them with local potential investors who
have already made it, but the ranks of the winners are small. In the meantime,
he tries to find any part-time jobs for the desperate. It is a grind.
“We need loosened credit
from Barack’s people; we need strings untied. Not easy,” he says.
He hasn’t completely given
up on lobbying the administration for help. He has expressed his frustrations
in an e-mail to Jarrett, who, he says, politely answered that the
administration thinks that it has been appropriately responsive to the community
(the White House says it has no reason to doubt that the two were in contact
with each other). He says he has not heard back from Obama strategist David
Plouffe, to whom he also sent a note. And he says he has met with Ken Bennett,
a Chicago-based Department of Labor official, to see what can be done to get
more residents working on South Side projects supported by stimulus dollars.
“I’m trying to be a bridge here,” he says.
Back in his office, Allen
shares his frustrations with other activists, including a young firebrand named
Mark Carter who, within the past year, has formed a new political party, dubbed
the Broke Party, part of a protest against the Obama administration and
mainstream politics in general. At this moment, the two men are struggling to come
up with the names of South Side African Americans who have clout with the Obama
administration — those who can get meaningful funding, in contrast with the
impotence that they think characterizes the lives of most South Side residents.
One name comes up that elicits nods: Richard Tolliver.
Carter smiles wanly.
“Tolliver is big,” Carter says. “Be nice to have his connections.”
Funding for some groups
Tolliver is a prominent
Episcopalian priest and the chief executive of the St. Edmund’s Redevelopment
Corp., which is in Washington Park, a neighborhood a few miles from
Bronzeville. Since its creation in 1990, it has been responsible for the
development of about 600 housing units in 28 buildings, largely for a mix of
poor and working-class residents.
The reliability of St.
Edmund’s has proven alluring to donors: For two decades, the corporation’s
funding has principally come from government grants and philanthropic
organizations. Since Obama entered the White House, St. Edmund’s has been the
recipient of millions in stimulus money and other federal funding, which has
gone toward new buildings that have set aside units for low-income earners and
the elderly.
The photographs of
luminaries in Tolliver’s office bespeak his clout. The most prominent pictures
are those of Tolliver with Obama. The 67-year-old reverend proudly points to a
photo of the two engaged in conversation during a recent Obama fundraiser. “He
knows of my work,” Tolliver says, smiling. “He asked, ‘How are things going?’
We were just two people talking. Very relaxed.”
The St. Edmund’s story
reflects the success of several South Side groups in accessing government funds
from the Obama administration, typically established groups that have enjoyed
federal support in the past. What irks Allen and other activists isn’t
Tolliver’s success, but the inability of newer groups on the South Side, those
without long track records, to lay claim to stimulus dollars and grants.
Tolliver is keenly aware of
his status. He says with pride that St. Edmund’s has been the only community
development corporation in Chicago to receive three different sources of
federal funding from the Obama administration for housing construction.
“People like to support
winners,” he explains, pointing to the upside of the influence of St. Edmund’s:
“Some of our poor and elderly receive quality housing. How is that anything but
good?”
But on some points,
Tolliver sympathizes with critics such as Allen. He sees persistent obstacles
to training and hiring opportunities for large numbers of local residents,
especially those who have spent time in prison. Overall, Tolliver says, he is
in agreement with skeptics who contend that the lives of too few local
residents have been touched by the stimulus package.
“It wasn’t big enough to
begin with . . . as economists say. . . . It didn’t trickle down to enough people here and in other cities,”
he says.
Still, the loyalist
Tolliver thinks political opponents, particularly congressional Republicans,
have unfairly constrained the president. Moreover, he regards Obama as a victim
of supporters’ huge expectations.
“It’s been difficult, but
what the administration has done for us and some others shows they are trying
hard,” he says.
‘I need to see something more’
Back in Bronzeville, in his
office on a recent Friday, Allen is on the phone. It is the end of a long week,
further complicated when he had to rush to the bank because the check for his
phone bill had not cleared. “Looky here,” he says to his caller, a Bronzeville
resident trying to help someone else. “I know he needs work. You don’t think I
know? I’ll see what I can do.”
A visitor arrives, Harold
Lucas, the 70-year-old director of the Bronzeville Visitor Information Center
and a passionate Obama supporter in 2008, when he sold Obama buttons and
bumpers stickers. Lucas projects a cautiously optimistic air about some of the
stimulus projects in the pipeline for Chicago. But, joined by a seething Carter,
he has the same worries about jobs as other community leaders in Bronzeville.
“I like the president,” Lucas says. “But I need to see something more happening
here.”
Carter, who has been
listening, wearing his Broke Party T-shirt, begins talking in a rush about
Obama being part of “the 1 percenters.”
“The 1 percenters,” Lucas
says softly, trying out the phrase. “Which makes us the 99 percenters, I
guess.”
“Damn right,” Carter says.
Allen just watches them.
“The 1 percenters,” Lucas
repeats, looking at Allen and then gesturing at the young renegade. “It’s
painful for me to hear [Carter] say these things. . . . But I can’t argue with it. What you have here are three
generations of the 99 percenters within the African American community. Within
four years of the president’s election, we all feel like we’re disenfranchised
and on the outside. . . . This close to the election, that’s a problem for
the president. Can’t have people stay at home.”
Carter mutters an obscenity
about the election. He looks at Allen and points a finger at him. “I’m not
going to deny the truth or be lulled to sleep just because it’s Obama. You
understand? I’m pointing a finger at Obama and . . .”
“Hey,” Allen interrupts,
smiling. He carves out his survival by playing conciliator among the hot and
the hotter. “I’m just trying to connect the dots here, okay? Maybe get
something done.”
“I’m for that,” Lucas says,
laughing. With that, their meeting winds down.
It’s late in the afternoon,
and Allen hurries downstairs, talking on his cellphone, promising yet another
caller that he’ll help him with a job search while assuring an acquaintance
that he’ll put $100 in his pocket by day’s end. He hangs up. “Poor guy is broke
and got his car towed,” he says. “He did some work for me. I’ve got to get the
money for him before the bank closes. Maybe get some donations.”
By the time he reaches the
sidewalk, Allen is breathing hard. “A rough week,” he says. A car pulls up,
another indignity: He is bumming a ride from a friend to the bank. But it is
then that he says he sees it, a real benefit to his ragtag crusader’s life,
some advantage — maybe the only one he enjoys — over an old comrade who once
traveled these roads with him.
“I don’t get to ride in
jets and motorcades like him with sirens going off,” he says. “But I get to see
these streets as they really are. I’m always seeing the Shortys.”
*
OBAMA’S
LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION HELPS MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS DEFRAUD AMERICA AND
GRAB AN AMERICAN JOB!
WELFARE
FOR ILLEGALS IN CA NOW EXCEEDS $22 BILLION PER YEAR. AND HALF THE MURDERS IN CA
ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!
10 Things You Need to Know About Obama’s Amnesty
Yesterday,
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) began accepting applications for
deferred action through US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). FAIR
has been closely tracking developments in President Obama’s executive amnesty
since its announcement on June 15. Below are some of the things you need to
know about the President’s unilateral changes to U.S. immigration policy.
- President
Obama’s amnesty will add nearly 2 million workers – possibly more – to the U.S. job
market. This is a negligent economic and social policy with over 8%
unemployment and half of recent young college graduates unemployed or
underemployed.
- Lax
documentation requirements to prove eligibility. DHS application instructions explicitly state that only copies
of documents will be required to meet the eligibility criteria for amnesty
including length of presence in the U.S., education, and even identity.
Also, illegal aliens will be able to submit any and all documents they
deem relevant to prove their eligibility. Virtually any form of
documentation will be accepted, from report cards and plane tickets to
mere personal correspondence.
- The
Administration is making this up as they go along. In June,
President Obama touted this policy as the “right thing to do” for some of
the best and brightest. However, it is clear that the educational,
residency and character requirements are becoming increasingly lax as more
details about the implementation of the amnesty emerge.
- No face-to-face
interview required. Most applications will be approved based only on the
documentation submitted.
- Few safeguards
against and limited consequences for filing fraudulent applications or
documents.
If DHS is actually diligent enough to identify fraud, the new amnesty
instructions merely state that the Administration “may” elect to penalize
illegal aliens by denying immigration benefits or placing them into
removal proceedings. However, since illegal aliens are only required to
submit copies – which lack identifiers of authenticity – it is unknown how
USCIS employees will be able to identify fraud in the first place.
- USCIS turns
blind eye to past illegal employment. Illegal aliens may use employment
records to show eligibility for amnesty despite the fact illegal aliens
are barred from working in the U.S. Past employers of illegal alien
applicants are not likely to face prosecution for hiring illegal aliens.
- Family of
deferred action recipients will also reap the benefits. Application instructions explicitly state
that information collected on an illegal alien will not be used against
him or her, or their “family members and guardians,” for the purpose of
immigration enforcement.
- Illegal aliens
granted work authorization can obtain Social Security cards. Illegal aliens
granted deferred action must apply for employment authorization if they
present an “economic necessity.” Once received, DHS work authorization
will allow them to apply for a Social Security Number and possibly other
benefits like driver’s licenses.
- Illegal aliens
with a criminal history DO qualify. DHS says only felony
convictions will make illegal aliens ineligible for amnesty, and even
then, convictions won’t necessarily be considered if they are expunged.
Additionally, criminal convictions in foreign countries will go undetected
and DHS will “exercise discretion” when considering juvenile records.
- USCIS doesn’t
have a great track record. Earlier this year, the DHS Inspector General found that USCIS
leadership told employees to rubber-stamp applications for immigration
benefits – including work authorization. In leaked documents to the Associated Press, USCIS
estimated that it will review 3,000 deferred action and work authorization
applications daily, only increasing the pressure to overlook possible
fraud and approve benefits quickly.
*
“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into
the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” …..
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
ARTICLE BELOW:
The study, based on 2010 and 2011
census data, found that 43 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S. at
least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as high
as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent immigrants.
*
“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy
are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end
work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190
billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the
labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor
*
“Law enforcement and public safety
have taken a back seat to attempts to satisfy immigrant advocacy groups,” Crane
told the panel of congressmen.
“What we're seeing is our Congress
and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness
becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have
more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can
drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical
care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy
free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
*
Slow path to progress for U.S. immigrants
43% on
welfare after 20 years
Immigrants lag behind
native-born Americans on most measures of economic well-being — even those who
have been in the U.S. the longest, according to a report from the Center for Immigration
Studies, which argues that
full assimilation is a more complex task than overcoming language or cultural differences.
The study, which
covers all immigrants, legal and illegal, and their U.S.-born children younger
than 18, found that immigrants tend to make economic progress by most measures
the longer they live in the U.S. but lag well behind native-born Americans on
factors such as poverty, health insurance coverage and homeownership.
The study, based on 2010 and 2011
census data, found that 43 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S. at
least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as high
as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent immigrants.
The report was
released at a time when both major presidential candidates have backed policies
that would make it easier to immigrate legally and would boost the numbers of
people coming to the U.S.
Steven A. Camarota, the center’s research director and author of the
96-page study, said it shows that questions about the pros and cons of
immigration extend well beyond the sheer numbers and touch on the broader
consequences of assimilating a population defined by tougher socioeconomic
challenges.
“Look, we know a lot
of these folks are going to be poor, we get it. But don’t tell the public it’s
all going great, which is the story line I think a lot of people want to
sell,” Mr. Camarota said. “There is progress over
time. Every measure shows improvement over time, but still, the situation does
not look like we’d like it to look, particularly for the less-educated. They
lag well behind natives even when they’ve been here for two decades, and that is
very disconcerting.”
Federal law requires
that the government deny immigrant visas to potential immigrants who are likely
to be unable to support themselves and thereby become public charges.
On Tuesday, a handful
of Republican senators wrote to the Homeland Security and State departments
asking them to explain why they don’t consider whether potential immigrants
would use many of the nearly 80 federal welfare programs when they evaluate
visa applications.
Neither department
responded to messages Tuesday seeking a response to the senators’ letter.
Expanding
legal immigration is a contentious issue for voters, the vast majority of whom
tell pollsters that they want the levels either retained or decreased.
But most politicians
want legal immigration expanded.
During his time in the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama backed
bills that would have dramatically boosted legal immigration, potentially by
hundreds of thousands a year. As president, he has called for the same thing.
(LA RAZA DEMS FEINSTEIN AND BOXER HAVE THREE (3) TIMES ATTEMPTED
A “SPECIAL AMNESTY” FOR 1.5 MILLION “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS. THEY DO
THIS ON BEHALF OF THEIR FILTHY RICH BIG AG BIZ DONORS…. DESPITE THE FACT THAT
ONE-THIRD OF ALL “CHEAP” FARM WORKERS WILL END UP ON WELFARE! – CA NOW PUTS OUT
$22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS!!! ON TOP OF THIS COUNTIES
HAND OUT MORE, WITH LOS ANGELLES LEADING. L.A. COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER
YEAR IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS! NOT ONE AMERICAN
(LEGAL) VOTED TO BE MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE! DEMS ARE THE PARTY of ILLEGALS!)
“We need to provide our farms a legal
way to hire workers that they rely on, and a path for those workers to earn
legal status. And our laws should respect families following the rules —
reuniting them more quickly instead of splitting them apart,” Mr. Obama said
in a major speech on the subject in El Paso, Texas, in 2011.
His presumed
Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, in June called for increasing legal
immigration for students who study in high-tech fields and admitting unlimited
family members of those who hold green cards.
“Our immigration
system should help promote strong families as well — not keep them apart. Our
nation benefits when moms and dads and their kids are all living together under
the same roof,” Mr. Romney told the National Association of
Latino Elected and Appointed Officials.
Mr. Camarota’s report took a broad look at the
immigrant population and found that immigrants are contributing to major
changes in American society, including that one-fourth of public school
students now speak languages other than English at home.
It also found that
immigrants as a population lead complex economic lives that aren’t easily put
into one category or another.
Immigrants made up
more than half of all farmworkers, 41 percent of taxi drivers and 48 percent of
maids and housecleaners, but they also represented about one-third of all
computer programmers and 27 percent of doctors.
The statistics varied
greatly by geography. In Massachusetts, native-led households averaged $89,000
in income while immigrant households averaged $66,000.
In Virginia,
immigrant-led households averaged $93,000 in income, far outstripping native
households’ $80,000 average. Likewise, immigrant families averaged a larger tax
burden in Virginia — though they also had higher rates of use of welfare or
Medicaid.
The center found that use of public benefits
varied dramatically based on where immigrants originated.
Mexicans were most
likely to use means-tested benefit programs, with 57 percent, while 6 percent
of those from the United Kingdom did. The rate for native-born Americans is 23
percent.
Mr. Camarota said a key dividing line is
educational attainment. Immigrants who have been in the U.S. 20 years and who
have bachelor’s degrees or higher make slightly more than the average
native-born American. But immigrants with only high school educations make less
no matter how long they have been in the U.S.
“The fact is the
less-educated in particular — they don’t do well over time,” he said. “It’s not
reasonable to expect an immigrant who comes to America with only a high school
education to close the gap with the native-born.”
Scholars debate
whether the current wave of immigrants will assimilate differently from those
in the 1800s and at the start of the 20th century.
George Borjas, a Harvard University
professor, has argued that second-generation Americans — the children of
today’s immigrants — will fall behind in wages by about 10 percent by 2030.
(THE BELOW STATS HAVE
NOTHING TO DO WITH ASSIMILATION! COME TO MEXIFORNIA WHERE 90% OF ALL SERVICE
SECTOR AND CONSTRUCTION JOBS ARE HELD BY MEXICANS. YOU WON’T HEAR THEM SPEAKING
ENGLISH!)
But in “Assimilation
Tomorrow,” a report released in November, Dowell Myers and John Pitkin said
immigrants of the 1990s eventually will attain high rates of homeownership and
71 percent will become U.S. citizens by 2030.
Those authors said
immigrants were set back by the recent recession but were still on track to
follow the same assimilation path as previous waves of immigrants.
(THE THING IS… MOST SOURCES PUT THE
NUMBER OF ILLEGALS AT 40 MILLION AND BREEDING FAST! THERE ARE 12 MILLION OF
THESE “11 MILLION” ILLEGALS IN SOUTHERN CA ALONE!)
They also said a
program to legalize the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S.
would be critical to helping assimilation.
*
“What we're seeing is our Congress and
national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness
becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have
more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can
drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical
care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy
free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
FAIR Legislative Update July 30, 2012
|
At a Capitol Hill press
conference last Thursday, leaders from the two unions representing Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and Border Patrol agents denounced the
Obama Administration's immigration policy. Flanked by Senators Jeff Sessions (R-AL),
Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and David Vitter (R-LA), these two union leaders painted
a stark picture of the state of immigration enforcement across the United
States.
ICE union leader Chris Crane, who represents over 7,000 agents,
decried the Obama Administration's policy of "prosecutorial
discretion," which directs enforcement agents to release illegal aliens
who do not meet the Administration's enforcement priorities. Calling it "a
failing policy," Crane described how the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) had launched it without any planning or foresight. "Every manager in
the field is interpreting these new policies different," Crane said.
"It's impossible to even get a picture of what our priorities are now. I
have never seen or heard of the type of fly by the seat of your pants,
disorganized confusion in a law enforcement organization like what we are
currently experiencing at ICE." (CQ Transcript, July 26, 2012)
Mr.
Crane also sharply criticized the President's new policy that grants
"deferred action" to illegal aliens who meet the eligibility criteria
for the DREAM Act. In particular, he warned of wide-spread abuse of the
process. "Prosecutorial discretion for DREAMers," Crane said,
"is solely based on the individual's claims. Our orders are: if an alien
says they went to high school, then let them go; if they say they have a GED,
then let them go. Officers have been told that there is no burden for the alien
to prove anything. .... At this point, we do not understand why DHS has any
criteria at all, as there is no requirement or burden to prove anything on the
part of the alien. We believe a significant number of people who are not
DREAMers are taking advantage of this practice to avoid arrest." (Id.)
Meanwhile Border Patrol Council President George McCubbin
criticized the attempt by DHS to portray the drop in illegal alien arrest rates
as a sign of success. The drop in arrest rates, McCubbin said, had more to do
with the Administration's change in enforcement tactics than its success at
combating illegal immigration. He noted as examples, DHS's termination of
immigration checks at transportation hubs near the border and its recent
decision to close nine border patrol stations. "Apprehensions at just one
of our stations have fallen from over 600 annually to just under 30 even though
now they have 10 times the number of agents assigned to that one station."
In short, McCubbin said, "Our agency has made it impossible for the agents
to go out there and do their jobs." (Id.)
Like Crane, McCubbin also
had strong words regarding President Obama's policy of "prosecutorial
discretion." "The action taken by President Obama undermines
immigration enforcement. Fraud will run rampant and our agents will have to err
on the side of caution to grant prosecutorial discretion so that they don't put
themselves into a position where they may find themselves involved in a civil
lawsuit. ... The agents we represent are not happy regarding this. We feel as
if we are political victims." (Id.)
The press conference came
just days after FAIR released its report President Obama's Record
of Dismantling Immigration Enforcement, a step-by-step look at how the President has undermined
immigration enforcement and the rule of law. To watch the press conference in
full, visit FAIR's YouTube page here.
*
OBAMA FUNDS LA RAZA
SUPREMACY WHICH OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA VP CECILIA MUNOZ
CECILIA MUNOZ IS ONE OF OBAMA’S MANY LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
OPERATING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. NO ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY HAS BEEN SO
INFESTED WITH A FOREIGN BASED POLITICAL PARTY AS OBAMA’S.
THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN
AMERICAN IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA –THE PARTY of ILLEGALS AND
MEXICAN SUPREMACY. THEIR GOAL IS OBAMA AMNESTY OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT, NO
E-VERIFY, OPEN BORDERS AND DE FACTO CITIZENSHIPS WITH DRIVERS’ LICENSES!
VIVA LA RAZA! YOU ARE! OBAMA HAS
SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE FUNDING TO EXPAND MEXICAN SUPREMACY IN OUR BORDERS!
On Thursday, Director of Intergovernmental
Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the Department of Homeland Security will
review its entire deportation caseload - that's 300,000 cases -to "clear
out low priority" cases and "make more room to deport people who have
been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk."
Obama's
lowest priority: some deportation cases
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
PresidentObama is in a
pickle. Immigration enforcement actually is working - or, at least, it was
working.
Under the Obama
administration, the government has removed almost 400,000 illegal immigrants
annually. That's 4 percent of the 10 million illegal immigrants estimated to be
living in America - and it sends a warning to those thinking of illegally
entering the United States.
Thanks to the Secure
Communities program, which requires local law enforcement to share arrestees'
fingerprints with Washington, about half of those deported have criminal
records. According to the administration, the vast majority of the rest either
re-crossed the border after deportation or were recently caught.
So what did the White House
announce last week? On Thursday,
Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the Department
of Homeland Security will review its entire deportation caseload -that's
300,000 cases - to "clear out low priority" cases and "make more
room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security
risk."
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.,
told the New York Times that the policy would protect youths with clean
criminal records whose parents brought them into the country when they were
minors. That is, he likened the Obama policy to his proposed legislation, the
Dream (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors) Act.
Actually, the Obama policy
goes much further than shielding minors. Under the guise of "prosecutorial
discretion," a Department of Homeland Security memo advises officials to
consider a number of "positive factors" before prosecuting offenders.
"Positive factors" include military service, "long-time lawful
permanent" residency, "minors and elderly individuals," nursing,
pregnant and disabled.
On the one hand, the policy
seems smart - let the government concentrate on deporting threats to public
safety.
On the other hand, the
White House essentially has announced that individuals who break federal
immigration law are a "low priority" and unlikely to face legal
consequences. So much for deterrence.
Worse, the new policy will
allow individuals who have been caught up in a Secure Communities' review to
apply for work permits. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the
pro-enforcement Center for Immigration Studies, said that the new policy makes
getting arrested equivalent to winning the lottery: "Their fellow illegal
aliens who were not arrested don't get work authorization."
Krikorian calls the new
policy "administrative amnesty." Obama failed to persuade Congress to
change the law. Now with the 2012 presidential election looming, he changed
policies implemented in the Clinton and George W. Bush years by fiat.
Bush's Secure Communities
program enabled Obama to boast that his administration delivered the greatest
number of illegal immigrant removals ever - 395,165 - in Fiscal Year 2009. In
2010, the number fell. Last month, he told the National Council of La Raza,
"Here's the only thing you should know. The Democrats and your president
are with you."
Re-election, after all,
is his highest priority.
*
FROM
JUDICIAL WATCH
GET ON THEIR E-NEWS!
Obama Starts Suspending Deportations TO BUILD HIS PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS
Last
Updated: Tue, 08/23/2011 - 4:14pm
Keeping its promise to suspend
deportations for a broad class of illegal immigrants, the Obama Administration
has officially started the process that’s expected to spare tens of thousands
from removal in the coming months.
Among the first illegal aliens to
benefit from the president’s backdoor amnesty plan is a Mexican man living in
Florida. He got busted a few years ago after applying for a work permit and was
earmarked for deportation. Earlier this month local media portrayed the man,
Manuel Guerra, as a desperate undocumented
workertrying
to build a new life after fleeing violent street gangs in his native Mexico.
This week the 27-year-old, who has
lived in the U.S. illegally for more than a decade, became the poster child for
Obama’s newly implemented amnesty program. Federal immigration authorities
officially suspended his deportation, according a mainstream newspaper
report that says Guerra had been caught in a“tortuous and seemingly failing
five-year court fight against deportation.”
Guerra
was spared after a working group from the departments of Homeland Security and
Justice met to start reviewing 300,000 deportation cases pending before
immigration courts nationwide. Under Obama’s new plan, authorities will have wide discretion to halt
deportationsand
will be encouraged to do so in cases where illegal immigrants attend school,
have family in the military or are primary bread winners.
The stealth amnesty plan was first
introduced last year in case Congress doesn’t pass legislation to legalize the
nation’s 12 million undocumented immigrants. Earlier this year political
appointees at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), actually
issued a directive to enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative
action.” The plan includes delaying deportation indefinitely (“deferred
action”), granting green cards, allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the
U.S. indefinitely while they seek legal status (known as “parole in place”) and
expanding the definition of “extreme hardships” so any illegal alien could meet
the criteria and remain in the country.
This goes hand in hand with the
president’s new blueprint for immigration reform, which was recently issued by
the White House. Titled “Building A 21stCentury
Immigration System,” the plan strives to strengthen the U.S. economy
and“competitiveness” by creating a legal immigration system that reflects the
nation’s “values and diverse needs.” After all, it claims that the“overwhelming
majority” of people living in the U.S. with “no legal status” are“simply
seeking a better life for themselves and their children.”
The president’s new plan, which has
already allocated $8 million to community groups that operate immigrant
“integrational programs,”also expands “anti discrimination provisions of
immigration law” and provides more “comprehensive anti-retaliation
protections.”
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/nclr-funding-skyrockets-after-obama-hires-its-vp
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/nclr-funding-skyrockets-after-obama-hires-its-vp
NATIONAL COUNSEL of LA RAZA "THE
RACE" - MEX FASCISM IN OUR BORDERS:
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
06/17/2011
A Judicial Watch investigation reveals that federal funding for a Mexican La Raza group that for years has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars has skyrocketed since one of its top officials got a job in the Obama White House.
The influential and politically-
No comments:
Post a Comment