OBAMA’S ADMIN IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA!
HIS SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA
SOLIS.
OBAMA FUNDS AND OPERATES LA RAZA FASCISM OUT OF THE WHITE
HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA CECILIA MUNOZ.
HISPANDERING OBAMA CONTINUES HIS BUILDING OF HIS LA RAZA
PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.
HOW MANY JOBS, AND HOW MANY BILLIONS IN “DREAM ACTS” WILL IT
COST US FOR OBAMA TO BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES?
Congressional Report Highlights President Obama’s
Immigration Power Grab
November 1, 2012 By FAIR Gov't Relations Team 2
Comments
The following story
appeared in FAIR’s October 31 Legislative Update. To subscribe to FAIR’s
Legislative Update click here.
Last week,
Congressional leadership finally spoke out regarding the Obama
Administration&’s unprecedented actions to circumvent Congress. The
criticism came in the form of a report released by House Majority Leader Eric
Cantor that chronicles the Administration&’s power-grab through what he
refers to as an “Imperial Presidency.” (See The Imperial Presidency Report, Oct. 2012) According to the report, President Obama
has “attempted to garner legislative authority, failed, and then acted
unilaterally in defiance. In other instances, the President…ignored Congress
and its authority from the outset.” (Id.)
The report consists
of forty examples of the President&’s deliberate circumvention of Congress,
including two incidents illustrating the President&’s usurpation of federal
immigration laws. (Id. at p. 20) The first is administrative amnesty,
which was enacted through a series of memos from Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) Director John Morton in 2011. Through these memos, President
Obama has “systematically, on an ongoing basis, [blocked] illegal aliens from
being placed into removal proceedings, already-initiated removal proceedings,
and [ended] deportations for potentially large numbers of criminals aliens.” (Id.;
see alsoFAIR Morton Memos Summary,
Jan. 2012)
The second
immigration-specific example in the report is President Obama&’s
administrative implementation of the DREAM Act (what the Administration refers
to as DACA or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). Despite
the fact that Congress rejected the DREAM Act as recently as December of 2010, Secretary
Napolitano nonetheless issued a memo in June announcing illegal aliens under
thirty who meet certain criteria will be allowed to stay and work in the United
States. (FAIR Legislative Update , June 19, 2012) The estimated 1.7
million illegal aliens who meet the criteria will be eligible for deferred
action and work authorization “despite the fact that such deferred action is
not authorized and under the law such individuals are subject to removal.” (See
Report at p. 21, Oct. 2012)
The Administration
initiated its backdoor amnesty programs despite President Obama&’s
concession that he could not simply bypass Congress to implement the DREAM Act.
“That,” he said, “[is] not how our democracy functions. That&’s not how our
Constitution is written.” (National Journal , June 18, 2012) Illegal aliens granted
work authorization under DACA will now be able to compete for jobs with the
nation&’s 14.7% unemployed and underemployed individuals. (See BLS
U-6 Unemployment
Data , Sept. 2012)
Obama’s State of the Campaign Address
By Alan W. Dowd
January 26, 2012
In Daily Mailer,
It was officially called the State of the Union Address, but
what President Obama actually delivered on Tuesday night was a campaign speech
targeted directly at his base. The message went something like this: “Unions,
environmentalists, teachers, Hispanic
immigrants, women, I’m your president…I’m your candidate.”
Consider the code words and messages sprinkled throughout
the speech.
The president began with a shameless signal to the Code Pink
crowd and anti-war left—the folks who fueled his rise and run for the White
House. “For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in
Iraq,” he declared, sidestepping the unraveling situation that has emerged as a
result. And he went on: “We’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Ten
thousand of our troops have come home. Twenty-three thousand more will leave by
the end of this summer.” Again, never mind what is left behind.
For Big Labor, he boasted about his efforts to get “workers
and automakers to settle their differences” and get a government-owned,
union-run General Motors “back on top as the world’s number one automaker.”
He gratuitously mentioned a “unionized plant in Milwaukee”
and cited key union cities in key states for good measure: “Detroit and Toledo
and Chicago…Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”
For the teachers’ unions, he lamented how “tight budgets
have forced states to lay off thousands of teachers” and called on Congress to
give states “the resources to keep good teachers on the job.” Drifting into
meaningless platitudes, he promised that in exchange he would support programs
to “replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.”
While on the subject of meaningless platitudes, the
president boasted that “there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took
office.” The reason for that, of course, is that he’s presiding over the worst
economy in four decades. In other words,
there are no jobs to entice immigrants to cross America’s southern
border—legally or illegally. (See Mitch Daniels’ sparkling rebuttal for
more on why.)
But the president’s
main message on immigration was for the amnesty lobby: “Hundreds of thousands
of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The
fact that they aren’t yet American citizens. Many were brought here as small children,
are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of
deportation,” he chided. “Let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible
young people,” who, it pays to recall, are not responsible enough to legalize
their status. The president’s environmental bloc had to wade through some
throw-away lines. For example, his boast that the country relies “less on
foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years” has a lot to do with low
demand caused by a beleaguered economy. And when he noted that “We don’t have
to choose between our environment and our economy,” he failed to mention that
when given the opportunity—in the form of the Keystone XL pipeline—he chose the
environmental lobby rather than economic recovery.
When he finally got on message, he got on a roll. “Renewable
energy use has nearly doubled,” he declared. “I will not walk away from the
promise of clean energy,” he gushed. And putting our money where his mouth is,
he unveiled plans to “allow the development of clean energy on enough public
land to power three million homes.” He then announced his decision to dragoon
the Department of Defense into the quixotic effort by directing it to “make one
of the largest commitments to clean energy in history,” thus turning America’s
shrinking Armed Forces into the R&D arm of his green agenda.
With lines that sounded strangely anachronistic, he rallied
another important bloc of his coalition, declaring that “Women should earn
equal pay for equal work.” He then vowed that he would not allow America to “go
back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to…charge
women differently from men.”
That brings us to the crescendo of his State of the Campaign
Address: the obligatory class-warfare rhetoric.
In the span of about 40 minutes, the president took credit
for the automaker bailout that saved “a million jobs”—but happened to be
launched in the waning hours of the Bush presidency—and then lambasted the bank
bailouts.
(NO PRESIDENT IN
HISTORY HAS TAKEN MORE LOOT FROM CRIMINAL BANKSTER THAN BARACK OBAMA! THERE IS
A REASON!!! BANKSTERS LOOTED MORE $$$ IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF OBAMA’S CORRUPT
ADMINISTRATION, THAN ALL EIGHT YEARS UNDER BUSH! IF YOU’RE NOT CONNECTED TO
OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, YOU MUST BE A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY
MEMBER TO BE A PART OF OBAMA’S “CHANGE” PERFORMANCE!)
“No bailouts, no handouts and no copouts,” he said in
ripping into banks, Wall Street and a financial system that “was allowed to
play by its own set of rules.”
He spoke of giving banks “a chance to repay a deficit of
trust,” tried to shame Congress into ending the “tax break for the wealthiest 2
percent of Americans” and decried “the corrosive influence of money in
politics.”
In a speech full of eye-rollers, that last one may take the prize.
After all, it was the Obama campaign that raised millions from undisclosed
donors in 2008. As Newsweek reported at the time, tens of thousands of dollars
poured into the Obama campaign from “individuals” with names like “Doodad Pro”
of Nunda, New York, and “Good Will” of Austin, Texas. “Good Will,” Newsweek
observed, “listed his employer as ‘Loving’ and his occupation as ‘You,’ while
supplying as his address 1015 Norwood Park Boulevard, which is shared by the
Austin nonprofit Goodwill Industries.” Moreover, it is the Obama campaign
that’s now boasting about raising $1 billion dollars for 2012.
By this time next year, we’ll know if the president’s
promises have held his coalition together.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click
here.
________________________________________
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine:
http://frontpagemag.com
*
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION OF AMERICA
FOR THE LA RAZA VOTE:
*
WIKI LEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN
BORDERS AGENDA – BUILDING A BORDERLESS TERRITORY WITH NARCOMEX:
OBAMA’S
HISPANDERING STARTS FROM HIS FIRST DAYS IN OUR WHITE HOUSE… OR IS IT MEXICO’S WHITE HOUSE???
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Plus, outrage after President Obama prepares to push ahead with his plan for so-called comprehensive immigration reform. Pres. Obama is fulfilling a campaign promise to give
legal status to millions of illegal aliens as he panders to the pro-amnesty, open borders lobby. Tonight we will have complete coverage.
*
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Plus, outrage after President Obama prepares to push ahead with his plan for so-called comprehensive immigration reform. Pres. Obama is fulfilling a campaign promise to give
legal status to millions of illegal aliens as he panders to the pro-amnesty, open borders lobby. Tonight we will have complete coverage.
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 16, 2009
Monday, February 16, 2009
Construction of the 670 miles of border fence mandated by
the Bush administration is almost complete. The Border Patrol says the new
fencing, more agents and new technology
have reduced illegal alien apprehensions. But fence opponents are trying to stop the last few miles from being finished. We will have a full report, tonight.
Plus, even open border advocates agree that the most effective way of fighting illegal immigration is to crack down on the employment of illegal aliens. Yet, those same groups are
opposed to E-Verify, which has an initial accuracy rate of 99.6% making it one the most accurate programs ever. E-Verify was stripped from the stimulus bill but who stripped it out and who is opposed to verifying employment status is still not clear.
have reduced illegal alien apprehensions. But fence opponents are trying to stop the last few miles from being finished. We will have a full report, tonight.
Plus, even open border advocates agree that the most effective way of fighting illegal immigration is to crack down on the employment of illegal aliens. Yet, those same groups are
opposed to E-Verify, which has an initial accuracy rate of 99.6% making it one the most accurate programs ever. E-Verify was stripped from the stimulus bill but who stripped it out and who is opposed to verifying employment status is still not clear.
*
“The
president's straddling can work for the time being. But unless he wants to end
up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually have to hop on one horse and lead
the way. That would have to be the horse named "Enforcement First." CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
“What's
needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known
for years: Enforce existing law.” CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
Obama's immigration straddle
If he wants Americans to
consider a "path to citizenship" for illegal aliens, he'll have to
lead on "enforcement first."
By the
Monitor's Editorial Board
from the June
23, 2009 edition
On the campaign trail,
President Obama promised to make immigration reform a top priority in his
first year as president. Now that he's in the White House, he's dragging his
heels.
After two postponements,
he'll meet with a select group of lawmakers on Thursday to discuss
legislation. So far, he's set neither a timeline for a bill, nor outlined
one.
The difference between the
campaign trail and the Oval Office is political reality. As White House Press
Secretary Robert Gibbs admitted last week, "The votes aren't there right
now."
MOST SOURCES CALCULATE
THERE ARE MORE LIKE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS. COME TO CALIFORNIA AND YOU KNOW
IMMEDIATELY THAT THERE ARE MORE THAN THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPAGANDA OF 12
MILLION !!!!
For one thing, the timing
is all wrong. A move to put the country's 11.6 million illegal immigrants on
a "path to citizenship" – and legal jobs – would upset Americans
mired in a deep recession.
Meanwhile, the White House
has put two big legislative priorities ahead of immigration this year:
healthcare and energy. That's a lot for Congress to digest – maybe too much.
Then there's politics. The
president owes voters who backed him in swing states such as Indiana, North
Carolina, and Ohio; many of them strenuously oppose what is seen as amnesty
in disguise. On the other hand, he's indebted to Latino voters who helped him
carry the key swing states of New Mexico, Colorado, and Nevada. Indeed, the
Democratic Senate majority leader, Harry Reid from Nevada, vows to move on
immigration reform this year.
THAT’S WHAT OBAMA IS. A
CIRCUS PERFORMER DANCING FOR WALL STREET BRIBES!
This leaves Obama in the
role of a circus performer, trying to straddle two horses at once:
He's trying to keep one
group with him by continuing many of President Bush's enforcement policies –
and by even expanding them. His budget proposes increased funding for
E-Verify (the electronic system that allows employers to check the legal
status of their workers); more money to hire people to identify criminal
illegal immigrants in US jails and prisons – and then deport them; and a
commitment to put a barrier of electronic detectors along the Mexican border.
With the other group, the
president is refocusing raids on the managers and owners who hire illegal
immigrants rather than on the migrants themselves. The Justice Department
recently reversed a Bush ruling that had denied effective legal
representation to illegal immigrants facing deportation. By concentrating on
employers, criminal illegal aliens, and smuggling networks, the total number
of deportations will likely fall.
The president's straddling can work for the time being.
But unless he wants to end up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually
have to hop on one horse and lead the way. That would have to be the horse
named "Enforcement First."
The president should take
his cue from Michael Chertoff, the head of homeland security for President
Bush. Mr. Chertoff found that the big lesson from failed immigration reform
in 2007 was that most Americans want to make sure the law is being enforced
before they'll consider anything else.
Obama, too, understands the
importance of enforcement. "The American people believe in immigration,
but they also believe that we can't tolerate a situation where people come to
the United States in violation of the law," he said last week at a
Hispanic prayer breakfast. But does he fully perceive the importance of
"first?"
If he wants immigration
reform, there is no other way than proving his administration is willing and
able to uphold the law – first. It must show – through tighter borders,
sustained pressure on employers, and reduced numbers of illegal immigrants –
that it has the will to enforce the law now and after reform (the last big
reform in the 1980s simply helped increase the flow of illegal immigration).
Proving commitment to
enforcement will take time and results, and will require gentle persuasion
for patience among the backers of citizenship for illegal immigrants.
Political reality affords
Obama some time. But only he can deliver the results, and the persuasion.
|
*
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITIOR
Illegal immigrants netted by local
police could be released
The Obama
administration directive comes as the president begins to assert control of the
immigration issue.
Atlanta
Some
undocumented immigrants swept up on minor charges such as fishing without a
license won’t face federal detention. Instead, they’ll be released on their own
recognizance under an Obama administration directive to a Nashville, Tenn.,
sheriff who charged 6,000 people with immigration crimes over the past 2-1/2
years.
The “release on
recognizance” order by Immigration and Customs Enforcement – a branch of the US
Department of Homeland Security – could affect at least some of the 66 US law
enforcement jurisdictions that are part of a controversial program which, in
essence, deputizes local police to act as de facto immigration agents.
The directive,
made earlier this month, is the result of overcrowding in federal prisons, but
also ties into a broader, ongoing review of the program, known as 287(g), and
its impact on immigrant communities.
“There hasn’t
been a [policy] change: ICE always puts a priority on criminal aliens who pose
a national security threat,” says Matt Chandler, a Department of Homeland
Security spokesman in Washington. But he acknowledges: “We are taking a deep,
hard look at the program.”
The sheriff who
received the ICE email earlier this month, Davidson County’s Daron Hall, says
that it’s been standard practice over the past three years to detain most
undocumented workers apprehended under the 287(g) program until their
immigration court hearing.
Releasing
nondangerous detainees could take a bite out of the 287(g) program, experts
say. Pre-2006 studies showed that about 85 percent of illegal immigrants
released on bond did not show up for their court date.
Releasing those
who pose little criminal threat is a sign of shifting priorities on immigration
policy in Washington, some say.
“There’s
definitely a change in focus,” says Michelle Waslin, senior policy analyst at
the Immigration Policy Center in Washington. “[The Obama administration] is
reasserting federal control over immigration reform.”
President Obama
is scheduled to meet Thursday with congressional leaders about immigration
reform.
The 287(g)
program has become politically popular in places like Arizona’s Maricopa
County, where Sheriff Joe Arpaio uses it to conduct drug and gang raids.
But it’s been
widely criticized, too.
In Davidson
County, Sheriff Hall hired a prisoner advocate, eased visitation rules, and
even changed the jail menu to reflect Tex-Mex tastes after a Hispanic woman in
custody gave birth while bearing shackles.
Hall says he met
with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano Tuesday morning
at a sheriffs’ round table. Secretary Napolitano “wants to see the program more
clearly defined so people aren’t doing it differently, which has been a
problem,” Hall says.
The sheriff adds
that there’s been no directive from ICE to stop processing people for minor
violations: “I see this less as a shift in policy and more about economics” of
prison management.
Immigration-rights
groups say the new directive won’t change anybody’s deportation status, but it
will make finding counsel and making preparations for departure easier and more
humane for families.
Others see the
directive as part of a broader Obama administration move to defang a core tenet
of the 287(g) program: The ability of local police to deal with local crime
problems such as drug smuggling and immigrant gangs. Last year, local police
made 20 percent of all immigration-related arrests in the US.
“For ICE to say,
‘We need to constrict your ability to use the program’ could be a very big
problem for those jurisdictions,” says Jessica Vaughan, senior policy analyst
at the Center for Immigration Studies.
*
“The principal
beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire
immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George
Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed
wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.”
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
from
the May 28, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
What will America stand
for in 2050?
The US should
think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.
By
Lawrence Harrison
Palo Alto, Calif.
President Obama
has encouraged Americans to start laying a new foundation for the country – on
a number of fronts. He has stressed that we'll need to have the courage to make
some hard choices. One of those hard choices is how to handle immigration. The
US must get serious about the tide of legal and illegal immigrants, above all
from Latin America.
It's not just a
short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment
approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of
healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as
a nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment