OBAMA and the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA 'THE RACE'

OBAMA’S ADMIN IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA!

HIS SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS.

OBAMA FUNDS AND OPERATES LA RAZA FASCISM OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA CECILIA MUNOZ.

HISPANDERING OBAMA CONTINUES HIS BUILDING OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.

HOW MANY JOBS, AND HOW MANY BILLIONS IN “DREAM ACTS” WILL IT COST US FOR OBAMA TO BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES?

Congressional Report Highlights President Obama’s Immigration Power Grab

November 1, 2012 By FAIR Gov't Relations Team 2 Comments

The following story appeared in FAIR’s October 31 Legislative Update. To subscribe to FAIR’s Legislative Update click here.

Last week, Congressional leadership finally spoke out regarding the Obama Administration&’s unprecedented actions to circumvent Congress. The criticism came in the form of a report released by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor that chronicles the Administration&’s power-grab through what he refers to as an “Imperial Presidency.” (See The Imperial Presidency Report, Oct. 2012) According to the report, President Obama has “attempted to garner legislative authority, failed, and then acted unilaterally in defiance. In other instances, the President…ignored Congress and its authority from the outset.” (Id.)

The report consists of forty examples of the President&’s deliberate circumvention of Congress, including two incidents illustrating the President&’s usurpation of federal immigration laws. (Id. at p. 20) The first is administrative amnesty, which was enacted through a series of memos from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director John Morton in 2011. Through these memos, President Obama has “systematically, on an ongoing basis, [blocked] illegal aliens from being placed into removal proceedings, already-initiated removal proceedings, and [ended] deportations for potentially large numbers of criminals aliens.” (Id.; see alsoFAIR Morton Memos Summary, Jan. 2012)

The second immigration-specific example in the report is President Obama&’s administrative implementation of the DREAM Act (what the Administration refers to as DACA or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). Despite the fact that Congress rejected the DREAM Act as recently as December of 2010, Secretary Napolitano nonetheless issued a memo in June announcing illegal aliens under thirty who meet certain criteria will be allowed to stay and work in the United States. (FAIR Legislative Update , June 19, 2012) The estimated 1.7 million illegal aliens who meet the criteria will be eligible for deferred action and work authorization “despite the fact that such deferred action is not authorized and under the law such individuals are subject to removal.” (See Report at p. 21, Oct. 2012)

The Administration initiated its backdoor amnesty programs despite President Obama&’s concession that he could not simply bypass Congress to implement the DREAM Act. “That,” he said, “[is] not how our democracy functions. That&’s not how our Constitution is written.” (National Journal , June 18, 2012) Illegal aliens granted work authorization under DACA will now be able to compete for jobs with the nation&’s 14.7% unemployed and underemployed individuals. (See BLS U-6 Unemployment Data , Sept. 2012)

 

Obama’s State of the Campaign Address

By Alan W. Dowd

 January 26, 2012

In Daily Mailer,

It was officially called the State of the Union Address, but what President Obama actually delivered on Tuesday night was a campaign speech targeted directly at his base. The message went something like this: “Unions, environmentalists, teachers, Hispanic immigrants, women, I’m your president…I’m your candidate.”

Consider the code words and messages sprinkled throughout the speech.

The president began with a shameless signal to the Code Pink crowd and anti-war left—the folks who fueled his rise and run for the White House. “For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq,” he declared, sidestepping the unraveling situation that has emerged as a result. And he went on: “We’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Ten thousand of our troops have come home. Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer.” Again, never mind what is left behind.

For Big Labor, he boasted about his efforts to get “workers and automakers to settle their differences” and get a government-owned, union-run General Motors “back on top as the world’s number one automaker.”

He gratuitously mentioned a “unionized plant in Milwaukee” and cited key union cities in key states for good measure: “Detroit and Toledo and Chicago…Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”

For the teachers’ unions, he lamented how “tight budgets have forced states to lay off thousands of teachers” and called on Congress to give states “the resources to keep good teachers on the job.” Drifting into meaningless platitudes, he promised that in exchange he would support programs to “replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.”

While on the subject of meaningless platitudes, the president boasted that “there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.” The reason for that, of course, is that he’s presiding over the worst economy in four decades. In other words, there are no jobs to entice immigrants to cross America’s southern border—legally or illegally. (See Mitch Daniels’ sparkling rebuttal for more on why.)

But the president’s main message on immigration was for the amnesty lobby: “Hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens. Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation,” he chided. “Let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people,” who, it pays to recall, are not responsible enough to legalize their status. The president’s environmental bloc had to wade through some throw-away lines. For example, his boast that the country relies “less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years” has a lot to do with low demand caused by a beleaguered economy. And when he noted that “We don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy,” he failed to mention that when given the opportunity—in the form of the Keystone XL pipeline—he chose the environmental lobby rather than economic recovery.

When he finally got on message, he got on a roll. “Renewable energy use has nearly doubled,” he declared. “I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy,” he gushed. And putting our money where his mouth is, he unveiled plans to “allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.” He then announced his decision to dragoon the Department of Defense into the quixotic effort by directing it to “make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history,” thus turning America’s shrinking Armed Forces into the R&D arm of his green agenda.

With lines that sounded strangely anachronistic, he rallied another important bloc of his coalition, declaring that “Women should earn equal pay for equal work.” He then vowed that he would not allow America to “go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to…charge women differently from men.”

That brings us to the crescendo of his State of the Campaign Address: the obligatory class-warfare rhetoric.

In the span of about 40 minutes, the president took credit for the automaker bailout that saved “a million jobs”—but happened to be launched in the waning hours of the Bush presidency—and then lambasted the bank bailouts.

(NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS TAKEN MORE LOOT FROM CRIMINAL BANKSTER THAN BARACK OBAMA! THERE IS A REASON!!! BANKSTERS LOOTED MORE $$$ IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF OBAMA’S CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION, THAN ALL EIGHT YEARS UNDER BUSH! IF YOU’RE NOT CONNECTED TO OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, YOU MUST BE A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY MEMBER TO BE A PART OF OBAMA’S “CHANGE” PERFORMANCE!)

“No bailouts, no handouts and no copouts,” he said in ripping into banks, Wall Street and a financial system that “was allowed to play by its own set of rules.”

He spoke of giving banks “a chance to repay a deficit of trust,” tried to shame Congress into ending the “tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans” and decried “the corrosive influence of money in politics.”

In a speech full of eye-rollers, that last one may take the prize. After all, it was the Obama campaign that raised millions from undisclosed donors in 2008. As Newsweek reported at the time, tens of thousands of dollars poured into the Obama campaign from “individuals” with names like “Doodad Pro” of Nunda, New York, and “Good Will” of Austin, Texas. “Good Will,” Newsweek observed, “listed his employer as ‘Loving’ and his occupation as ‘You,’ while supplying as his address 1015 Norwood Park Boulevard, which is shared by the Austin nonprofit Goodwill Industries.” Moreover, it is the Obama campaign that’s now boasting about raising $1 billion dollars for 2012.

By this time next year, we’ll know if the president’s promises have held his coalition together.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

________________________________________

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

*

OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION OF AMERICA FOR THE LA RAZA VOTE:

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-push.html

*

WIKI LEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA – BUILDING A BORDERLESS TERRITORY WITH NARCOMEX:

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html

 

OBAMA’S HISPANDERING STARTS FROM HIS FIRST DAYS IN OUR WHITE HOUSE… OR  IS IT MEXICO’S WHITE HOUSE???

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Thursday, April 9, 2009

 Plus, outrage after President Obama prepares to push ahead with his plan for so-called comprehensive immigration reform. Pres. Obama is fulfilling a campaign promise to give
legal status to millions of illegal aliens as he panders to the pro-amnesty, open borders lobby. Tonight we will have complete coverage.
*

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 16, 2009

Construction of the 670 miles of border fence mandated by the Bush administration is almost complete. The Border Patrol says the new fencing, more agents and new technology
have reduced illegal alien apprehensions. But fence opponents are trying to stop the last few miles from being finished. We will have a full report, tonight.


 Plus, even open border advocates agree that the most effective way of fighting illegal immigration is to crack down on the employment of illegal aliens. Yet, those same groups are
opposed to E-Verify, which has an initial accuracy rate of 99.6% making it one the most accurate programs ever. E-Verify was stripped from the stimulus bill but who stripped it out and who is opposed to verifying employment status is still not clear.

 

*

“The president's straddling can work for the time being. But unless he wants to end up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually have to hop on one horse and lead the way. That would have to be the horse named "Enforcement First."  CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

*

“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

*

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

Obama's immigration straddle If he wants Americans to consider a "path to citizenship" for illegal aliens, he'll have to lead on "enforcement first." By the Monitor's Editorial Board from the June 23, 2009 edition          On the campaign trail, President Obama promised to make immigration reform a top priority in his first year as president. Now that he's in the White House, he's dragging his heels. After two postponements, he'll meet with a select group of lawmakers on Thursday to discuss legislation. So far, he's set neither a timeline for a bill, nor outlined one. The difference between the campaign trail and the Oval Office is political reality. As White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs admitted last week, "The votes aren't there right now." MOST SOURCES CALCULATE THERE ARE MORE LIKE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS. COME TO CALIFORNIA AND YOU KNOW IMMEDIATELY THAT THERE ARE MORE THAN THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPAGANDA OF 12 MILLION !!!! For one thing, the timing is all wrong. A move to put the country's 11.6 million illegal immigrants on a "path to citizenship" – and legal jobs – would upset Americans mired in a deep recession. Meanwhile, the White House has put two big legislative priorities ahead of immigration this year: healthcare and energy. That's a lot for Congress to digest – maybe too much. Then there's politics. The president owes voters who backed him in swing states such as Indiana, North Carolina, and Ohio; many of them strenuously oppose what is seen as amnesty in disguise. On the other hand, he's indebted to Latino voters who helped him carry the key swing states of New Mexico, Colorado, and Nevada. Indeed, the Democratic Senate majority leader, Harry Reid from Nevada, vows to move on immigration reform this year. THAT’S WHAT OBAMA IS. A CIRCUS PERFORMER DANCING FOR WALL STREET BRIBES! This leaves Obama in the role of a circus performer, trying to straddle two horses at once: He's trying to keep one group with him by continuing many of President Bush's enforcement policies – and by even expanding them. His budget proposes increased funding for E-Verify (the electronic system that allows employers to check the legal status of their workers); more money to hire people to identify criminal illegal immigrants in US jails and prisons – and then deport them; and a commitment to put a barrier of electronic detectors along the Mexican border. With the other group, the president is refocusing raids on the managers and owners who hire illegal immigrants rather than on the migrants themselves. The Justice Department recently reversed a Bush ruling that had denied effective legal representation to illegal immigrants facing deportation. By concentrating on employers, criminal illegal aliens, and smuggling networks, the total number of deportations will likely fall. The president's straddling can work for the time being. But unless he wants to end up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually have to hop on one horse and lead the way. That would have to be the horse named "Enforcement First." The president should take his cue from Michael Chertoff, the head of homeland security for President Bush. Mr. Chertoff found that the big lesson from failed immigration reform in 2007 was that most Americans want to make sure the law is being enforced before they'll consider anything else. Obama, too, understands the importance of enforcement. "The American people believe in immigration, but they also believe that we can't tolerate a situation where people come to the United States in violation of the law," he said last week at a Hispanic prayer breakfast. But does he fully perceive the importance of "first?" If he wants immigration reform, there is no other way than proving his administration is willing and able to uphold the law – first. It must show – through tighter borders, sustained pressure on employers, and reduced numbers of illegal immigrants – that it has the will to enforce the law now and after reform (the last big reform in the 1980s simply helped increase the flow of illegal immigration). Proving commitment to enforcement will take time and results, and will require gentle persuasion for patience among the backers of citizenship for illegal immigrants. Political reality affords Obama some time. But only he can deliver the results, and the persuasion.

 

*

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITIOR

 

Illegal immigrants netted by local police could be released

 

The Obama administration directive comes as the president begins to assert control of the immigration issue.

 

By Patrik Jonsson  |  Staff writer/ June 23, 2009 edition

Atlanta

Some undocumented immigrants swept up on minor charges such as fishing without a license won’t face federal detention. Instead, they’ll be released on their own recognizance under an Obama administration directive to a Nashville, Tenn., sheriff who charged 6,000 people with immigration crimes over the past 2-1/2 years.

The “release on recognizance” order by Immigration and Customs Enforcement – a branch of the US Department of Homeland Security – could affect at least some of the 66 US law enforcement jurisdictions that are part of a controversial program which, in essence, deputizes local police to act as de facto immigration agents.

The directive, made earlier this month, is the result of overcrowding in federal prisons, but also ties into a broader, ongoing review of the program, known as 287(g), and its impact on immigrant communities.

“There hasn’t been a [policy] change: ICE always puts a priority on criminal aliens who pose a national security threat,” says Matt Chandler, a Department of Homeland Security spokesman in Washington. But he acknowledges: “We are taking a deep, hard look at the program.”

The sheriff who received the ICE email earlier this month, Davidson County’s Daron Hall, says that it’s been standard practice over the past three years to detain most undocumented workers apprehended under the 287(g) program until their immigration court hearing.

Releasing nondangerous detainees could take a bite out of the 287(g) program, experts say. Pre-2006 studies showed that about 85 percent of illegal immigrants released on bond did not show up for their court date.

Releasing those who pose little criminal threat is a sign of shifting priorities on immigration policy in Washington, some say.

“There’s definitely a change in focus,” says Michelle Waslin, senior policy analyst at the Immigration Policy Center in Washington. “[The Obama administration] is reasserting federal control over immigration reform.”

President Obama is scheduled to meet Thursday with congressional leaders about immigration reform.

The 287(g) program has become politically popular in places like Arizona’s Maricopa County, where Sheriff Joe Arpaio uses it to conduct drug and gang raids.

But it’s been widely criticized, too.

In Davidson County, Sheriff Hall hired a prisoner advocate, eased visitation rules, and even changed the jail menu to reflect Tex-Mex tastes after a Hispanic woman in custody gave birth while bearing shackles.

Hall says he met with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano Tuesday morning at a sheriffs’ round table. Secretary Napolitano “wants to see the program more clearly defined so people aren’t doing it differently, which has been a problem,” Hall says.

The sheriff adds that there’s been no directive from ICE to stop processing people for minor violations: “I see this less as a shift in policy and more about economics” of prison management.

Immigration-rights groups say the new directive won’t change anybody’s deportation status, but it will make finding counsel and making preparations for departure easier and more humane for families.

Others see the directive as part of a broader Obama administration move to defang a core tenet of the 287(g) program: The ability of local police to deal with local crime problems such as drug smuggling and immigrant gangs. Last year, local police made 20 percent of all immigration-related arrests in the US.

“For ICE to say, ‘We need to constrict your ability to use the program’ could be a very big problem for those jurisdictions,” says Jessica Vaughan, senior policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies.

*

“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.”

 

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

 

 

from the May 28, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html

What will America stand for in 2050?

The US should think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.

By Lawrence Harrison

 

Palo Alto, Calif.

President Obama has encouraged Americans to start laying a new foundation for the country – on a number of fronts. He has stressed that we'll need to have the courage to make some hard choices. One of those hard choices is how to handle immigration. The US must get serious about the tide of legal and illegal immigrants, above all from Latin America.

It's not just a short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as a nation.