OBAMA IS PRESIDENT FOR WALL STREET LOOTERS, THE 1%, HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTERS and HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.
THE MIDDLE CLASS SIMPLY GETS THE TAX BILLS FOR THE CRIMES OF THE AFOREMENTIONED.
PAT BUCHANAN - How Obama Turned Us Over to NARCOMEX for looting
PATRICK BUCHANAN How Barack Obama and the Democrat Party Surrendered America's Sovereignty to Mexico
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY is NOW THE PARTY FOR ILLEGALS, OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY AND NO ID REQUIRED OF LA RAZA VOTERS.
WHOSE COUNTRY IS IT?
MEXICO SAYS IT IS THEIRS AND RIPE FOR THE LOOTING. DEMS AGREE AND HAVE PROMISED TO TURN ALL 49 OTHER STATES INTO MEX-INFESTED MEXIFORNIAS.
CA NOW PUTS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS, AND HALF THE MURDERS ARE NOW BY MEXICAN GANGS!
PAT BUCHANAN ON OBAMA'S HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS' VOTES:
What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
*
TOWNHALL.com
Whose Country Is This?
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.
Arizona acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.
"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable situation."
We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.
What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
WHAT IS THE STATE of the AMERICAN DEMOCRACY WHERE THE
GOVERNMENT ABATES A MEXICAN INVASION, AND THEN HANDS THE TAX BILLS FOR THE
OCCUPATION TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS WITHOUT EVEN ONE VOTE?
DID YOU VOTE TO BE LOOTED BY MEXICO?
FORTY MILLION AMERICANS HAVE FALLEN INTO POVERTY AND THESE
NUMBERS ARE CONSERVATIVE.
THERE ARE NOW 40 MILLION MEXICANS OCCUPYING AMERICA. THEY
GET AMERICAN JOBS, ANCHOR BABY WELFARE AND “FREE” EDUCATION, “FREE” MEDICAL AT
ANY EMERGENCY ROOM HOSPITAL.
MEX-INFESTED LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION
PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. PREGNANT
MEXICAN WOMEN IS ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS. THESE ANCHOR BABIES DELIVER
18 YEARS OF WELFARE TO THE ILLEGAL, AND HELP ANCHOR MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN
AMERICA.
SO, WHO PAYS FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE AND PRISON STATE IN
AMERICA? NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED TO BE LOOTED BY MEXICO. THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS NOW
THE PARTY of ILLEGALS. THEIR AGENDA IS OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY, MUCHO DREAM
ACTS, AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY = VOTES.
*
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California."
---Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party
*
Richard
Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council "They're afraid we're going to take
over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We
will take them over. . We are here to stay."
*
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
*
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing "La Reconquista" in California."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing "La Reconquista" in California."
*
Since the 1986 “amnesty” give
away, there have been yearly 1.5 million illegals walk over our borders waving
their Mexican flags, and slipping right into our jobs, welfare lines and
hospital emergency rooms to give birth.
Meanwhile every year there are 1.5 million Americans
that fall into poverty.
Daily there are 12 Americans murdered by illegals.
In California alone there have been 2,000 Americans murdered by illegals that
fled back to Mexico.
Foreclosure is the highest in states with the
heaviest Mexican occupation. The highest foreclosure rate in this country is in
La Raza Harry Reid’s Nevada where 25% of the population are ILLEGALS.
In Mexican occupied Los Angeles, 47% of those
employed are illegals. L.A. county pays out $50 MILLION PER MONTH in welfare to
illegals.
And yet hispandering Barack Obama and his banksters’
LA RAZA DEMS are at this very moment working for bit by bit amnesty.
In fact hispandering OBAMA just took 400 border
patrol guards off the border with NarcoMex. Pelosi, Feinstein and Boxer have
all vowed quick amnesty, NO WALL, no
e-verify, and NO ID for illegals to vote dem!
Who pays?
US Census Bureau report: 40 million
living in poverty
By Kate Randall
30 September 2009
30 September 2009
The overall poverty rate in
the US rose to 13.2 percent in 2008, as workers across all sectors of the
economy became jobless and increasing numbers of families were forced into
destitution, according to a new government report. Real median household income
also declined by 3.6 percent.
The report released Tuesday,
part of the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, is the most recent to
measure the recession’s impact on working class families and the poor. Based on
the changes between 2007 and 2008, the first full year of the recession, its
findings do not reflect increases in poverty and joblessness this year as the
consequences of the crisis have become even more acute.
The official poverty rate of
13.2 percent in 2008 was up from 12.5 percent in 2007. This figure translates
into 39.8 million people in poverty across America. The official poverty level
is set at $22,000 annually for a family of four with two children or $12,000
for an individual, an absurdly low threshold. This means that far more people
than indicated by the survey do not have adequate resources to pay for food,
shelter, medical care and other basic necessities.
The poverty rate rose across
virtually all demographic groups. Poverty among Hispanics climbed from 21.5
percent in 2007 to 23.2 percent in 2008. Non-Hispanic whites saw poverty rise
from 8.2 percent in 2007 to 8.6 percent in 2008, while poverty among Asians was
up from 10.2 percent in 2007 to 11.8 percent in 2008. African-Americans were
the only group where poverty remained statistically unchanged at a staggering
24.7 percent, or about one in four people.
The Census Bureau reported a
rise in poverty in 31 states and the District of Columbia. Two of the four most
populous states—California and Florida—saw poverty rates rise by 1 percent, to
just over 13 percent in each state.
Connecticut saw the largest
increase in poverty, rising to 9.3 percent, with an additional 1.4 percent of
the state’s population living in poverty. Connecticut’s proximity to Wall
Street, the center of the financial collapse, contributed to the state’s
poverty as spending cuts by bankers and other financial employees in the New
York City suburbs were reflected in declines in income for the lowest paid
workers.
William Frey, a demographer
at the Brookings Institution, commented in an interview, “People don’t go from
being a CEO or a hedge fund manager into poverty, but there is a trickle-down
effect when these groups of people start to cut back on their spending. In many
places, the first people to go when things get tight are the lowest-earning
workers.”
Michigan, which has been
devastated by the collapse of the auto industry, is the only state that has
seen poverty increase for two years in a row, with the rate now standing at 13
percent. The industrial states of Pennsylvania and Indiana also saw significant
increases in poverty, along with Oregon and Hawaii.
The South remained the most
impoverished, at 14.3 percent, up slightly from 14.2 percent in 2007.
Mississippi, with 21.2 percent in poverty, saw the highest rate of any state,
while poverty in Kentucky, West Virginia and Arkansas hovered around 17
percent.
The Midwest poverty rate rose
to 12.4 percent from 11.1 percent the previous year. The West saw the largest
increase in poverty, up by 1.5 percent, rising from 12 percent in 2007 to 13.5
percent. The Northeast, which saw an increase in poverty in 2007, saw the rate
remain statistically unchanged, at 11.6 percent in 2008.
The rate of poverty among
America’s children is alarming, with 19 percent—14.1 million children—affected
in 2008, up a full percentage point from a year earlier. This rate increased in
26 states and in Washington, DC. Children in families headed by a single female
suffered the highest rates of poverty: 43.5 percent of those under 18 years of
age live in poverty, while 53.3 percent of children under 6 years are poor.
Increasing numbers of
families, both the jobless and workers facing shrinking hours and paychecks,
are turning to food pantries and the Food Stamp program. Food Stamp use in 2008
jumped 13 percent to nearly 9.8 million US households, led by Louisiana, Maine
and Kentucky. Two cities—Pharr, Texas, and the former General Motors production
center, Flint, Michigan—each had more than a third of their residents on food
stamps. Families with two or more workers accounted for 28.4 percent of food
stamp recipients in 2008, up 1.5 percent from 2007.
Following three years of
annual income increases, real median income declined in the US by 3.6 percent
between 2007 and 2008, falling from $52,163 to $50,303. The Midwest and South
saw the biggest declines in median income, 4 percent and 4.9 percent
respectively.
The gap between the richest
and poorest Americans is also widening as the economic crisis ravages household
budgets. An Associated Press analysis of the Census Bureau statistics shows
that the wealthiest 10 percent of Americans, those making $138,000 or more a
year, earned 11.4 times the $12,000 made by individuals living below the
poverty line in 2008. In 2007, the richest 10 percent made 11.2 times more.
The jump in poverty and
income inequality comes as the job market continues to shrink, even as
government and economic analysts speak of a turnaround. According to US Labor
Department figures from July, job seekers now outnumber openings six to one,
with only 2.4 million full-time, permanent jobs open while 14.5 million people
are officially unemployed and looking for work.
Many companies remain
cautious about hiring new workers in the uncertain economic environment. Having
trimmed back workers’ hours and laid off temporary workers, even if businesses
do expand in the future they are likely to increase output by increasing the
workload on existing employees.
Heidi Shierholz, an economist
at the Economic Policy Institute, told the New York Times, “They have
tons of room to increase work without hiring a single person. For people who
are out of work, we do not see signs of light at the end of the tunnel.”
From December 2007 through
July 2009, job openings have declined in every area of the country: 45 percent
in the West and South, 36 percent in the Midwest, and 23 percent in the
Northeast. According to the Times, since the end of 2008 virtually every
sector of the economy has been hit by the collapse in job openings, which have
shrunk 47 percent in manufacturing, 37 percent in construction, 22 percent in
retail, and 21 percent in education and health services.
While it is estimated that
the government could spend in excess of $23 trillion to bail out the banks, and
hundreds of billions to pursue its military conquests in Iraq and Afghanistan,
nothing of any substance is being done to help the millions of Americans being
plunged into joblessness and poverty.
The National Employment Law
Project, an advocacy group, estimates that 400,000 Americans nationwide could
exhaust their unemployment benefits by the end of September and 1.4 million
long-term unemployed could stop receiving checks by the end of the year. (WITHOUT VOTE
OF AMERICANS (LEGALS) IN CA, THE LA RAZA CONTROLLED STATE LEGISLATURE JUST
PASSED A LAW TO HAND HALF A MILLION ILLEGALS UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS… WHO PAYS???)
In some states, such as
California, where the unemployment rate hit 12.2 percent in July—the highest
level since 1940—workers laid off early in the recession have received three
extensions on the regular 26 weeks of benefits, bringing them to a maximum of
79 weeks of payments.
The US House recently passed a
$1.4 billion bill to provide another 13 weeks of jobless benefits in high
unemployment states like California. The legislation still faces a vote in the
Senate. The extension in benefits, however, would not cover many of the newly
unemployed, or those yet to lose their jobs.
In California, for instance,
hundreds of thousands who filed claims after June 14 of this year would be
eligible for no more than 39 weeks of benefits. A House bill that would have
provided longer extensions through 2010 was scrapped because it would have cost
$70 billion, a price tag the lawmakers were unwilling to authorize.
*
DEMS ARE THE PARTY for
ILLEGALS. THEY VOTE TO LAW ANYTHING LA RAZA DEMANDS. IT IS A SANCTUARY STATE
WHICH FLIES THE MEXICAN FLAG, SPEAKS SPANISH FIRST AND NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
WHILE LEGALS MAY LOSE
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE of MEXIFORNIA IS PUSHING TO
HAND ILLEGALS UNEMPLOYMENT INSTEAD OF DEPORTING THEM.
COME TO CA. LOOK
AROUND YOU. COUNT HOW MANY NON-HISPANICS ARE IN AMERICAN JOBS!
More than 400,000
Californians could lose unemployment benefits
By Kevin Martinez and Norisa Diaz
28 December 2012
28 December 2012
In the discussion on the so-called “fiscal cliff,” very little
attention has been devoted by the political establishment and media to the
imminent expiration of extended federal unemployment benefits. If these
benefits are allowed to expire, some 2 million people throughout the US,
including 400,000 in California, will be immediately cut off from this limited
form of cash assistance.
*
"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to
the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot." ---Excelsior, the national newspaper of
Mexico
*
Illegal alien
population may be as high as 38 million Study: Illegal alien population may be
as high as 38 million
A new report
finds the Homeland Security Department "grossly underestimates" the
number of illegal aliens living in the U.S. Homeland Security's Office of
Immigration Studies released a report August 31 that estimates the number of
illegal aliens residing in the U.S. is between 8 and 12 million. But the group Californians for
Population Stabilization, or CAPS, has unveiled a report estimating the illegal
population is actually between 20 and 38 million. Four experts, all of whom
contributed to the study prepared by CAPS, discussed their findings at a news
conference at the National Press Club in Washington Wednesday. James Walsh, a
former associate general counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service,
said he is "appalled" that the Bush administration, lawyers on the
Senate Judiciary Committee, and every Democratic presidential candidate, with
the exception of Joe Biden, have no problem with sanctuary cities for illegal
aliens. "Ladies and gentlemen, the sanctuary cities and the people that
support them are violating the laws of the United States of America. They're
violating 8 USC section 1324 and 1325, which is a felony -- [it's] a felony to
aid, support, transport, shield, harbor illegal aliens," Walsh stated.
Walsh said his analysis indicating there are 38 million illegal aliens in the
U.S. was calculated using the conservative estimate of three illegal immigrants
entering the U.S. for each one apprehended. According to Walsh, "In the
United States, immigration is in a state of anarchy -- not chaos, but
anarchy."
*
UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS,
BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL. IN CA MORE THAN 90% OF ALL SERVICE AND CONSTRUCTION
JOBS GO TO HISPANICS. MOST ILLEGALS USING A STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.
*
WHY THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS:
“What employers really
want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage costs, experts
say.”
*
UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF
ILLEGALS!
"We have a situation
where the job market — the bottom fell out, yet we kept legal immigration
relatively high without even a national debate," he said. "As a
consequence, a lot of the job growth has been going to immigrants."
Mr. Obama did take action
this year to grant many illegal immigrants up to 30 years of age a tentative
legal status that prevents them from being deported and authorizes them to work
in the United States.
Some Republicans in
Congress have criticized Mr. Obama's policy, saying it violates his powers and
will mean more competition for scarce jobs.
*
“The ranks of the unemployed in the
United States rose last year to 49.7 million, based on a new measure that
provides a fuller picture of poverty than that previously reported by U.S.
Census Bureau data.”
THERE ARE NOW NEARLY 50 MILLION HEAVY BREEDING MEXICANS IN
OUR BORDERS, JOBS, WELFARE LINES and JAILS & PRISONS.
MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS ARE DRUGS, CRIMINALS, POVERTY,
VIOLENCE, RACISM, AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.
OBAMA SPENT HIS ENTIRE FIRST TERM HISPANDERING TO ILLEGALS
AND EASING THEM INTO OUR JOBS BY SUING AMERICAN STATES TO BLOCK E-VERIFY AND
DROPPING WORKFORCE ENFORCEMENT ON LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT of ILLEGALS
BY 70%.
OBAMA, AND THE DEMS, NOW PARTY for ILLEGALS, HAND THEM
OBAMACARE, DREAM ACTS, OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS and LA RAZA SUPREMACY.
Nearly
50 million living in poverty in US
By
Kate Randall
16 November 2012
16 November 2012
The ranks of the unemployed in the
United States rose last year to 49.7 million, based on a new measure that
provides a fuller picture of poverty than that previously reported by U.S.
Census Bureau data.
The revised poverty rate of 16.1 percent is up more than a percentage point
from the 15 percent figure reported by the government in September.
Coming a little more
than a week after the 2012 elections, the news that nearly one in six Americans
is living in poverty received little attention in the media or from the Obama
administration. Neither big-business party has any policies to alleviate
growing poverty, which is exacerbated by entrenched unemployment and a sluggish
economy.
The Supplemental
Poverty Measure (SPM), devised a year ago, factors in expenses for food,
clothing, shelter, utilities, health care and other essentials beyond what the
previous official formula took into account. It includes in its income measure
such government-provided benefits as Social Security, unemployment benefits and
nutrition assistance.
The SPM figures
released by the Census Bureau on Thursday show that while some households may
have incomes above the poverty line, factors such as medical expenses are
pushing increasing numbers into poverty. The new figures also indicate that the
tepid job growth in the more than four years since the financial crisis has
come mostly in the form of low-wage jobs that in many cases are not able to
lift families out of poverty.
More than 15 percent
of working-age adults, aged 18-64, lived in poverty in 2011. Among those with
some form of employment, 9.4 percent fell below the poverty line. Those working
less than full-time, year-round, saw an 18.5 percent poverty rate. A third of
those working less than one week in the course of the year—16.2 million, or
33.5 percent—lived in poverty last year.
Based on the SPM, the
poverty rates were dramatically higher for several segments of the population.
The share of people 65 years and older living in poverty was 15.1 percent,
nearly double the 8.7 percent figure according to the official measure. This
rise came despite including Medicare and Social Security benefits in income.
The single biggest economic burden on seniors is medical expenses that must be
paid out of pocket.
The poverty rate
among Hispanics stood at 28 percent in 2001 using the SPM, significantly higher
than the 25.4 percent rate using the older measure. This difference is
attributed to limited access by immigrants to government programs, as well as
the concentration of Hispanics in regions of the country that have seen big
cutbacks to government programs.
(ASK WHAT OBAMA HAS DONE FOR BLACK
AMERICA COMPARED WITH WHAT HE HAS DONE FOR MEXICANS!)
According to the new
measurement, more than a quarter of all African-American households were living
in poverty in 2011. Poverty in households headed by a single female stood at 30
percent. Among households renting their homes, 29.3 percent were poor.
Also hard-hit are
people living in urban areas where living expenses are higher and assistance
from government programs has not kept pace with growing need. Under the newly devised standard,
California saw the highest poverty rate of any state. A staggering 8.8 million
people—23.5 percent—of Californians are living in poverty, a figure largely
driven by the state’s high cost of living and sharp budget cuts to social
programs.
Following closely
behind California is the nation’s capital, Washington, D.C., where 23.2 percent
lived in poverty last year according to the SPM. The next most impoverished
state was Florida, at 19.5 percent.
Use of the new census
measurement also showed a significant shift in poverty among the various
regions of the country. In the West, 20 percent of households were living in
poverty in 2011, compared to 16 percent in the South, the region of the country
historically more impoverished. This is undoubtedly largely influenced by
factors such as the assault on social programs in California and the collapse
of the housing market in Nevada.
The new Census
measurement also reveals that Social Security is by far the most important
program contributing to a reduction in poverty. According to the SPM, when
calculating the effects of benefits and expenses on overall poverty rates in
the American population, poverty was reduced by more than 8 percent due to
Social Security benefits, while medical expenses increased poverty by about 3.5
percent.
The SNAP food stamp
program and unemployment insurance benefits also provide significant protection
against poverty. But it is precisely these programs—along with Medicare and
Medicaid—that are being targeted for cuts as part of the bipartisan assault on
social programs being prepared in the wake of the 2012 elections under the
cynical pretext of averting a looming “fiscal cliff.”
Coming just more than
a week after the presidential election, the new poverty figures put the lie to
claims by the Obama administration that significant gains have been made on the
way to recovery. Also on Thursday, the Labor Department released initial claims
for state unemployment benefits, which rose 78,000 last week to a seasonally
adjusted 439,000.
This was the biggest
one-week jump since the spike in claims caused by Hurricane Katrina in
September 2005. The number has been significantly impacted by last month’s
Hurricane Sandy, which left millions of homes and businesses without power,
paralyzed transportation and caused widespread damage in the Northeast US.
But the rise points
to a more general trend of slow job growth. Economists polled by Reuters before
Thursday’s jobless claims were released said they expected the pace of job
growth to slow to an average 144,000 jobs per month in the fourth quarter, down
from 174,000 in the third quarter.
Long-term
unemployment remains entrenched. According to the new Census report, about 16.4
million Americans of working age worked less than one week in all of 2011. Of
these, fully a third are living in poverty, according to the new SPM
measurement. Federally funded extended unemployment benefits are set to expire
in January, threatening to deprive more than 2 million jobless workers of cash
assistance and plunging more American households into poverty.
*
Over 70% of the
United States annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida,
and New York) results from immigration.
*
Some Interestng Quotes from
Hispanic "Leaders" :
MEXICO’S FASCIST BABY BREEDING PROGRAM AT GRINGO COST:
MEXICO’S FASCIST BABY BREEDING PROGRAM AT GRINGO COST:
"Go back to Boston!
Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims!
Get out!
We are the future.
You are old and tired.
Go on.
We have beaten you.
Leave like beaten rats.
You old white people.
It is your duty to die ...
Through love of having children, we are going to take over."
---Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets
*
Anchor Baby Power
La Voz de
Aztlan has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been
born as US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined
to transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there
are over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year whereas George
Putnam, a radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de
Aztlan believes that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor
Babies" born every year.
The
video below depicts the many faces of the "Anchor Baby Generation".
The video includes a fascinating segment showing a group of elementary school
children in Santa Ana, California confronting the Minutemen vigilantes. The
video ends with a now famous statement by Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez of the
University of Texas at Austin.
THIS ALSO COMES WITH
THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION.
THESE FIGURES ARE VERY DATED!
Subject: From the L.A. Times Newspaper
1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County (L. A. County has 10 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. Los Angeles County reports 2 billion dollars in the underground economy is lost.
1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County (L. A. County has 10 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. Los Angeles County reports 2 billion dollars in the underground economy is lost.
*
2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens. There have been 2000 Californians murdered by illegals who then fled back to Mexico to avoid prosecution.
2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens. There have been 2000 Californians murdered by illegals who then fled back to Mexico to avoid prosecution.
*
3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.
3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.
*
4. Over 2/3's of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
4. Over 2/3's of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
*
5. Nearly 25% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally. Los Angeles County spends millions in jail cost for illegals still actively drug trafficking. To solve this problem, the county dispersed the Mexican drug dealers to jails over the states. This only propagated the drug dealers operations. The County spends millions in fighting Mexican gangs which have spread all over the United States. The County also spends millions on graffiti abatement.
5. Nearly 25% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally. Los Angeles County spends millions in jail cost for illegals still actively drug trafficking. To solve this problem, the county dispersed the Mexican drug dealers to jails over the states. This only propagated the drug dealers operations. The County spends millions in fighting Mexican gangs which have spread all over the United States. The County also spends millions on graffiti abatement.
*
6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.
6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.
*
7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border. It’s assumed the vast majority of the other half are Mexicans living here legally.
7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border. It’s assumed the vast majority of the other half are Mexicans living here legally.
*
8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.
8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.
*
9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking. They united Mexicans in protest demanding “rights” they presume to be entitled to. (They seem to have one program. Convince the Mexican invaders this country actually belongs to the Mexicans.)
9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking. They united Mexicans in protest demanding “rights” they presume to be entitled to. (They seem to have one program. Convince the Mexican invaders this country actually belongs to the Mexicans.)
*
10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English. 3.9 million speak Spanish (10.2 million people in L. A. County). ( How many Mexicans do you know that have contempt for the English language?) Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops but 29% are on welfare. Over 70% of the United States annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York) results from immigration.
10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English. 3.9 million speak Spanish (10.2 million people in L. A. County). ( How many Mexicans do you know that have contempt for the English language?) Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops but 29% are on welfare. Over 70% of the United States annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York) results from immigration.
*
SANCTUARY
COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS
County
Spends $600 Mil On Welfare For Illegal Immigrants
03/11/2010
For
the second consecutive year taxpayers in a single U.S. county will dish out
more than half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs
of illegal immigrants.
Los
Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a dire
financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens. In
January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants collected
more than $50 million in welfare benefits. At that
rate the cash-strapped county will pay around $600 million this year to provide
illegal aliens’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare perks.
THE
EXORBITANT FIGURE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ENORMOUS COST OF EDUCATING, MEDICALLY
TREATING, OR INCARCERATING ILLEGALS ALIENS. THIS COSTS THE COUNTY AN ADDITIONAL
ONE BILLION DOLLARS.
The
exorbitant figure, revealed this week by a county supervisor, doesn’t even
include the enormous cost of educating, medically treating or incarcerating
illegal aliens in the sprawling county of about 10 million residents. Los
Angeles County annually spends more than $1 billion for those combined
services, including $500 million for healthcare and $350 million for public safety.
About
a quarter of the county’s welfare and food stamp issuances go to parents who
reside in the United States illegally and collect benefits for their anchor
babies, according to the figures from the county’s Department of Social
Services. In 2009 the tab ran $570 million and this year’s figure is expected
to increase by several million dollars.
Illegal
immigration continues to have a “catastrophic
impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who
revealed the information has said. The former fifth-grade history teacher has
repeatedly come under fire from his liberal counterparts for publicizing
statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has had on the
region. Antonovich, who has served on the board for nearly three decades,
represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the size of Rhode
Island and has about 2 million residents.
His
district is simply a snippet of a larger crisis. Nationwide, Americans pay
around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare benefits
that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in public
schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC)
for low-income women and their children. Tens of billions more are spent on
other social services, medical care, public education and legal costs such as incarceration
and public defenders.
*
Stop anchor baby benefits /300,000 a
year born in US
Most countries don’t even
allow that many LEGAL immigrants per year into their country...
A proposition to stop automatic benefits to children of illegals (anchor babies) is coming soon.
The cost to California is 4 to 6 billion a year. This prop is not driven by racism, but by citizen-ism... to prevent people from taking dollars from legal taxpayers to give to another illegal group of non-citizen parents....
A proposition to stop automatic benefits to children of illegals (anchor babies) is coming soon.
The cost to California is 4 to 6 billion a year. This prop is not driven by racism, but by citizen-ism... to prevent people from taking dollars from legal taxpayers to give to another illegal group of non-citizen parents....
It will also help to prevent illegals crossing our border and having a baby for this purpose (and then later complaining about unfair/exploitation) This also will help stop Birth-Tourism.
Illegal immigration will never stop, as long our laws stay the same, are not enforced, and we act like idiots and give our hard earned taxes, freedoms and citizen rights away.
300,000 illegal babies a year are born here.
97 percent of anchor baby births are paid for by US taxpayers - your money that you need for your own kids.
Ted Hilton with the TAXPAYER REVOLUTION has launched a June 2010 ballot initiative to help solve California's budget deficit crisis. The laws address the problems of "birth tourism," welfare dependency and other benefits used by those here unlawfully which are draining U.S. citizens' tax dollars. Mail all petitions to POB 9985, San Diego, CA 92169.
go to this link to DOWNLOAD the petiton for the June 2010 Ballot initiative:
*
CITY JOURNAL
HISPANIC FAMILY
City journal
HISPANIC FAMILY
Runaway illegitimacy is creating a new U.S. underclass. Heather Mac Donald Autumn 2006 |
Unless the life chances of children raised by single mothers
suddenly improve, the explosive growth of the U.S. Hispanic population over the
next couple of decades does not bode well for American social stability.
Hispanic immigrants bring near–Third World levels of fertility to America,
coupled with what were once thought to be First World levels of illegitimacy. (In fact, family breakdown
is higher in many Hispanic countries than here.) Nearly half of the children
born to Hispanic mothers in the U.S. are born out of wedlock, a proportion that
has been increasing rapidly with no signs of slowing down. Given what
psychologists and sociologists now know about the much higher likelihood of
social pathology among those who grow up in single-mother households, the
Hispanic baby boom is certain to produce more juvenile delinquents, more school
failure, more welfare use, and more teen pregnancy in the future.
The
government social-services sector has already latched onto this new client
base; as the Hispanic population expands, so will the demands for a larger
welfare state. Since conservative open-borders advocates have yet to
acknowledge the facts of Hispanic family breakdown, there is no way to know
what their solution to it is. But they had better come up with one quickly,
because the problem is here—and growing.
The
dimensions of the Hispanic baby boom are startling. The Hispanic birthrate is
twice as high as that of the rest of the American population. That high
fertility rate—even more than unbounded levels of immigration—will fuel the
rapid Hispanic population boom in the coming decades. By 2050, the Latino
population will have tripled, the Census Bureau projects. One in four Americans
will be Hispanic by mid-century, twice the current ratio. In states such as
California and Texas, Hispanics will be in the clear majority. Nationally,
whites will drop from near 70 percent of the total population in 2000 to just
half by 2050. Hispanics will account for 46 percent of the nation’s added
population over the next two decades, the Pew Hispanic Center reports.
But
it’s the fertility surge among unwed Hispanics that should worry
policymakers. Hispanic women have the highest unmarried birthrate in the
country—over three times that of whites and Asians, and nearly one and a half
times that of black women, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Every
1,000 unmarried Hispanic women bore 92 children in 2003 (the latest year for which
data exist), compared with 28 children for every 1,000 unmarried white women,
22 for every 1,000 unmarried Asian women, and 66 for every 1,000 unmarried
black women. Forty-five percent of all Hispanic births occur outside of
marriage, compared with 24 percent of white births and 15 percent of Asian
births. Only the percentage of black out-of-wedlock births—68 percent—exceeds
the Hispanic rate. But the black population is not going to triple over the
next few decades.
As if
the unmarried Hispanic birthrate weren’t worrisome enough, it is increasing
faster than among other groups. It jumped 5 percent from 2002 to 2003, whereas
the rate for other unmarried women remained flat. Couple the high and
increasing illegitimacy rate of Hispanics with their higher overall fertility
rate, and you have a recipe for unstoppable family breakdown.
The
only bright news in this demographic disaster story concerns teen births.
Overall teen childbearing in the U.S. declined for the 12th year in a row in
2003, having dropped by more than a third since 1991. Yet even here, Hispanics
remain a cause for concern. The rate of childbirth for Mexican teenagers, who
come from by far the largest and fastest-growing immigrant population, greatly
outstrips every other group. The Mexican teen birthrate is 93 births per every
1,000 girls, compared with 27 births for every 1,000 white girls, 17 births for
every 1,000 Asian girls, and 65 births for every 1,000 black girls. To put
these numbers into international perspective, Japan’s teen birthrate is 3.9,
Italy’s is 6.9, and France’s is 10. Even though the outsize U.S. teen birthrate
is dropping, it continues to inflict unnecessary costs on the country, to which
Hispanics contribute disproportionately.
To
grasp the reality behind those numbers, one need only talk to people working on
the front lines of family breakdown. Social workers in Southern California, the
national epicenter for illegal Hispanic immigrants and their progeny, are in
despair over the epidemic of single parenting. Not only has illegitimacy become
perfectly acceptable, they say, but so has the resort to welfare and social
services to cope with it.
Dr.
Ana Sanchez delivers babies at St. Joseph’s Hospital in the city of Orange,
California, many of them to Hispanic teenagers. To her dismay, they view having
a child at their age as normal. A recent patient just had her second baby at
age 17; the baby’s father is in jail. But what is “most alarming,” Sanchez
says, is that the “teens’ parents view having babies outside of marriage as
normal, too. A lot of the grandmothers are single as well; they never married,
or they had successive partners. So the mom sends the message to her daughter
that it’s okay to have children out of wedlock.”
Sanchez
feels almost personally involved in the problem: “I’m Hispanic myself. I wish I
could find out what the Asians are doing right.” She guesses that Asian
parents’ passion for education inoculates their children against teen pregnancy
and the underclass trap. “Hispanics are not picking that up like the Asian
kids,” she sighs.
Conservatives
who support open borders are fond of invoking “Hispanic family values” as a
benefit of unlimited Hispanic immigration. Marriage is clearly no longer one of
those family values. But other kinds of traditional Hispanic values have
survived—not all of them necessarily ideal in a modern economy, however. One of
them is the importance of having children early and often. “It’s considered
almost a badge of honor for a young girl to have a baby,” says Peggy Schulze of
Chrysalis House, an adoption agency in Fresno. (Fresno has one of the highest
teen pregnancy rates in California, typical of the state’s heavily Hispanic
farm districts.) It is almost impossible to persuade young single Hispanic
mothers to give up their children for adoption, Schulze says. “The attitude is:
‘How could you give away your baby?’ I don’t know how to break through.”
The
most powerful Hispanic family value—the tight-knit extended family—facilitates
unwed child rearing. A single mother’s relatives often step in to make up for
the absence of the baby’s father. I asked Mona, a 19-year-old parishioner at
St. Joseph’s Church in Santa Ana, California, if she knew any single mothers.
She laughed: “There are so many I can’t even name them.” Two of her cousins,
aged 25 and 19, have children without having husbands. The situation didn’t
seem to trouble this churchgoer too much. “They’ll be strong enough to raise
them. It’s totally okay with us,” she said. “We’re very close; we’re there to
support them. They’ll do just fine.”
As
Mona’s family suggests, out-of-wedlock child rearing among Hispanics is by no
means confined to the underclass. The St. Joseph’s parishioners are precisely
the churchgoing, blue-collar workers whom open-borders conservatives celebrate.
Yet this community is as susceptible as any other to illegitimacy.
Fifty-year-old Irma and her husband, Rafael, came legally from Mexico in the
early 1970s. Rafael works in a meatpacking plant in Brea; they have raised five
husky boys who attend church with them. Yet Irma’s sister—a homemaker like
herself, also married to a factory hand—is now the grandmother of two
illegitimate children, one by each daughter. “I saw nothing in the way my
sister and her husband raised her children to explain it,” Irma says. “She gave
them everything.” One of the fathers of Irma’s young nieces has four other
children by a variety of different mothers. His construction wages are being
garnished for child support, but he is otherwise not involved in raising his
children.
The
fathers of these illegitimate children are often problematic in even more
troubling ways. Social workers report that the impregnators of younger Hispanic
women are with some regularity their uncles, not necessarily seen as a bad
thing by the mother’s family. Alternatively, the father may be the boyfriend of
the girl’s mother, who then continues to stay with the grandmother. Older men
seek out young girls in the belief that a virgin cannot get pregnant during her
first intercourse, and to avoid sexually transmitted diseases.
The
tradition of starting families young and expand- ing them quickly can come into
conflict with more modern American mores. Ron Storm, the director of the
Hillview Acres foster-care home in Chino, tells of a 15-year-old girl who was
taken away from the 21-year-old father of her child by a local child-welfare
department. The boyfriend went to jail, charged with rape. But the girl’s
parents complained about the agency’s interference, and eventually both the
girl and her boyfriend ended up going back to Mexico, presumably to have more
children. “At 15, as the Quinceañera tradition celebrates, you’re considered
ready for marriage,” says Storm. Or at least for childbearing; the marriage
part is disappearing.
But
though older men continue to take advantage of younger women, the age gap
between the mother and the father of an illegitimate child is quickly closing.
Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties tries to teach young
fathers to take responsibility for their children. “We’re seeing a lot more 13-
and 14-year-old fathers,” says Kathleen Collins, v.p. of health education. The
day before we spoke, Scott Montoya, an Orange County sheriff’s deputy, arrested
two 14-year-old boys who were bragging about having sexual relations with a cafeteria
worker from an Olive Garden restaurant. “It’s now all about getting girls
pregnant when you’re age 15,” he says. One 18-year-old in the Planned
Parenthood fathers’ program has two children by two different girls and is
having sex with five others, says health worker Jason Warner. “A lot of [the
adolescent sexual behavior] has to do with getting respect from one’s peers,”
observes Warner.
Normally,
the fathers, of whatever age, take off. “The father may already be married or
in prison or doing drugs,” says Amanda Gan, director of operations for Toby’s
House, a maternity home in Dana Point, California. Mona, the 19-year-old
parishioner at St. Joseph’s Church, says that the boys who impregnated her two
cousins are “nowhere to be found.” Her family knows them but doesn’t know if
they are working or in jail.
Two
teen mothers at the Hillview Acres home represent the outer edge of Hispanic
family dysfunction. Yet many aspects of their lives are typical. Though these
teenagers’ own mothers were unusually callous and irresponsible, the social
milieu in which they were raised is not unusual.
Irene’s
round, full face makes her look younger than her 14 years, certainly too young
to be a mother. But her own mother’s boyfriend repeatedly forced sex on her,
with the mother’s acquiescence. The result was Irene’s baby, Luz. Baby Luz has
an uncle her own age, Irene’s new 13-month-old brother. Like Irene, Irene’s
mother had her first child at 14, and produced five more over the next 16
years, all of whom went into foster care. Irene’s father committed suicide
before she was old enough to know him. The four fathers of her siblings are out
of the picture, too: one of them, the father of her seven-year-old brother and
five-year-old sister, was deported back to Mexico after he showed up drunk for
a visit with his children, in violation of his probation conditions.
Irene
is serene and articulate—remarkably so, considering that in her peripatetic
early life in Orange County she went to school maybe twice a week. She likes to
sing and to read books that are sad, she says, especially books by Dave Pelzer,
a child-abuse victim who has published three best-selling memoirs about his
childhood trauma. She says she will never get married: “I don’t want another
man in my life. I don’t want that experience again.”
Eighteen-year-old
Jessica at least escaped rape, but her family experiences were bad enough. The
large-limbed young woman, whose long hair is pulled back tightly from her
heart-shaped face, grew up in the predominantly Hispanic farming community of
Indio in the Coachella Valley. She started “partying hard” in fifth grade, she
says—at around the same time that her mother, separated from her father, began
using drugs and going clubbing. By the eighth grade, Jessica and her mother
were drinking and smoking marijuana together. Jessica’s family had known her
boyfriend’s family since she was four; when she had her first child by him—she
was 14 and he was 21—her mother declared philosophically that she had always
known that it would happen. “It was okay with her, so long as he continued to
give her drugs.”
Jessica
originally got pregnant to try to clean up her life, she says. “I knew what I
was doing was not okay, so having a baby was a way for me to stop doing what I
was doing. In that sense, the baby was planned.” She has not used drugs since
her first pregnancy, though she occasionally drinks. After her daughter was
born, she went to live with her boyfriend in a filthy trailer without plumbing;
they scrounged food from dumpsters, despite the income from his illegal drug
business. They planned to get married, but by the time she got pregnant again
with a son, “We were having a lot of problems. We’d be holding hands, and he’d
be looking at other girls. I didn’t want him to touch me.” Eventually, the
county welfare agency removed her and put her in foster care with her two children.
Both
Jessica and her caddish former boyfriend illustrate the evanescence of the
celebrated Hispanic “family values.” Her boyfriend’s family could not be more
traditional. Two years ago, Jessica went back to Mexico to celebrate her
boyfriend’s parents’ 25th wedding anniversary and the renewal of their wedding
vows. Jessica’s own mother got married at 15 to her father, who was ten years
her senior. Her father would not let his wife work; she was a “stay-at-home
wife,” Jessica says. But don’t blame the move to the U.S. for the behavior of
younger generations; the family crack-up is happening even faster in Latin
America.
Jessica’s
mother may have been particularly negligent, but Jessica’s experiences are not
so radically different from those of her peers. “Everybody’s having babies
now,” she says. “The Coachella Valley is filled with girls’ pregnancies. Some
girls live with their babies’ dads; they consider them their husbands.” These
cohabiting relationships rarely last, however, and a new cohort of fatherless
children goes out into the world.
Despite
the strong family support, the prevalence of single parenting among Hispanics
is producing the inevitable slide into the welfare system. “The girls aren’t
marrying the guys, so they are married to the state,” Dr. Sanchez observes.
Hispanics now dominate the federal Women, Infants, and Children free food
program; Hispanic enrollment grew over 25 percent from 1996 to 2002, while
black enrollment dropped 12 percent and white enrollment dropped 6.5 percent.
Illegal immigrants can get WIC and other welfare programs for their
American-born children. If Congress follows President Bush’s urging and grants
amnesty to most of the 11 million illegal aliens in the country today, expect
the welfare rolls to skyrocket as the parents themselves become eligible.
Amy
Braun works for Mary’s Shelter, a home for young single mothers who are
homeless or in crisis, in Orange County, California. It has become “culturally
okay” for the Hispanic population to use the shelter and welfare system, Braun
says. A case manager at a program for pregnant homeless women in the city of
Orange observes the same acculturation to the social-services sector, with its
grievance mongering and sense of victimhood. “I’ll have women in my office on
their fifth child, when the others have already been placed in foster care,”
says Anita Berry of Casa Teresa. “There’s nothing shameful about having
multiple children that you can’t care for, and to be pregnant again, because
then you can blame the system.”
The consequences
of family breakdown are now being passed down from one generation to the next,
in an echo of the black underclass. “The problems are deeper and wider,” says
Berry. “Now you’re getting the second generation of foster care and group home
residents. The dysfunction is multigenerational.”
The
social-services complex has responded with barely concealed enthusiasm to this
new flood of clients. As Hispanic social problems increase, so will the
government sector that ministers to them. In July, a New York Times
editorial, titled young latinas and a cry for help, pointed out the elevated
high school dropout rates and birthrates among Hispanic girls. A quarter of all
Latinas are mothers by the age of 20, reported the Times. With the usual
melodrama that accompanies the pitch for more government services, the Times
designated young Latinas as “endangered” in the same breath that it disclosed
that they are one of the fastest-growing segments of the population. “The time
to help is now,” said the Times—by which it means ratcheting up the
taxpayer-subsidized social-work industry.
In
response to the editorial, Carmen Barroso, regional director of International
Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Hemisphere Region, proclaimed in a letter
to the editor the “urgent need for health care providers, educators and
advocates to join the sexual and reproductive health movement to ensure the
fundamental right to services for young Latinas.”
Wherever
these “fundamental rights” might come from, Barroso’s call nevertheless seems
quite superfluous, since there is no shortage of taxpayer-funded “services” for
troubled Latinas—or Latinos. The schools in California’s San Joaquin Valley
have day care for their students’ babies, reports Peggy Schulze of Chrysalis
House. “The girls get whatever they need—welfare, medical care.” Advocates for
young unwed moms in New York’s South Bronx are likewise agitating for more
day-care centers in high schools there, reports El Diario/La Prensa. A
bill now in Congress, the Latina Adolescent Suicide Prevention Act, aims to
channel $10 million to “culturally competent” social agencies to improve the
self-esteem of Latina girls and to provide “support services” to their families
and friends if they contemplate suicide.
The
trendy “case management” concept, in which individual “cases” become the focal
point around which a solar system of social workers revolves, has even reached
heavily Hispanic elementary and middle schools. “We have a coordinator, who
brings in a collaboration of agencies to deal with the issues that don’t allow
a student to meet his academic goals, such as domestic violence or drugs,”
explains Sylvia Rentria, director of the Family Resource Center at Berendo
Middle School in Los Angeles. “We can provide individual therapy.” Rentria offers
the same program at nearby Hoover Elementary School for up to 100 students.
This
July, Rentria launched a new session of Berendo’s Violence Intervention Program
for parents of children who are showing signs of gang involvement and other
antisocial behavior. Ghady M., 55 and a “madre soltera” (single mother), like
most of the mothers in the program, has been called in because her 16-year-old
son, Christian, has been throwing gang signs at school, cutting half his
classes, and ending up in the counseling office every day. The illegal
Guatemalan is separated from her partner, who was “muy malo,” she says; he was
probably responsible for her many missing teeth. (The detectives in the heavily
Hispanic Rampart Division of the Los Angeles Police Department, which includes
the Berendo school, spend inordinate amounts of time on domestic violence
cases.) Though Ghady used to work in a factory on Broadway in downtown L.A.—
often referred to as Little Mexico City—she now collects $580 in welfare
payments and $270 in food stamps for her two American-born children.
Christian
is a husky smart aleck in a big white T-shirt; his fashionably pomaded hair
stands straight up. He goes to school but doesn’t do homework, he grins; and
though he is not in a gang, he says, he has friends who are. Keeping Ghady and
Christian company at the Violence Intervention Program is Ghady’s grandniece,
Carrie, a lively ten-year-old. Carrie lives with her 26-year-old mother but
does not know her father, who also sired her 12-year-old brother. Her
five-year-old brother has a different father.
Yet
for all these markers of social dysfunction, fatherless Hispanic families
differ from the black underclass in one significant area: many of the mothers
and the absent fathers work, even despite growing welfare use. The former
boyfriend of Jessica, the 18-year-old mother at the Hillview Acres foster home,
works in construction and moonlights on insulation jobs; whether he still deals
drugs is unknown. Jessica is postponing joining her father in Texas until she
finishes high school, because once she moves in with him, she will feel
obligated to get a job to help the family finances. The mother of Hillview’s
14-year-old Irene used to fix soda machines in Anaheim, California, though she
got fired because she was lazy, Irene says. Now, under court compulsion, she
works in a Lunchables factory in Santa Ana, a condition of getting her children
back from foster care. The 18-year-old Lothario and father of two, whom Planned
Parenthood’s Jason Warner is trying to counsel, works at a pet store. The
mother of Carrie, the vivacious ten-year-old sitting in on Berendo Middle
School’s Violence Intervention Program, makes pizza at a Papa John’s pizza
outlet.
How
these two value systems—a lingering work ethic and underclass mating norms—will
interact in the future is anyone’s guess. Orange County sheriff’s deputy
Montoya says that the older Hispanic generation’s work ethic is fast
disappearing among the gangbanging youngsters whom he sees. “Now, it’s all
about fast money, drugs, and sex.” It may be that the willingness to work will
plummet along with marriage rates, leading to even greater social problems than
are now rife among Hispanics. Or it may be that the two contrasting practices
will remain on parallel tracks, creating a new kind of underclass: a culture
that tolerates free-floating men who impregnate women and leave, like the vast
majority of black men, yet who still labor in the noncriminal economy. The
question is whether, if the disposition to work remains relatively strong, a
working parent will inoculate his or her illegitimate children against the
worst degradations that plague black ghettos.
From an intellectual
standpoint, this is a fascinating social experiment, one that academicians
are—predictably—not attuned to. But the consequences will be more than
intellectual: they may severely strain the social fabric. Nevertheless, it is
an experiment that we seem destined to see to its end. Tisha Roberts, a
supervisor at an Orange County, California, institution that assists children
in foster care, has given up hope that the illegitimacy rate will taper off.
“It’s going to continue to grow,” she said.
*
THERE
IS NO ONE THAT WORKS HARDER FOR ILLEGALS THAN BARACK OBAMA!
*
Since the 1986 “amnesty” give away, there have been
yearly 1.5 million illegals walk over our borders waving their Mexican flags,
and slipping right into our jobs, welfare lines and hospital emergency rooms to
give birth.
Meanwhile every year there are 1.5 million Americans
that fall into poverty.
Daily there are 12 Americans murdered by illegals.
In California alone there have been 2,000 Americans murdered by illegals that
fled back to Mexico.
Foreclosure is the highest in states with the
heaviest Mexican occupation. The highest foreclosure rate in this country is in
La Raza Harry Reid’s Nevada where 25% of the population are ILLEGALS.
In Mexican occupied Los Angeles, 47% of those
employed are illegals. L.A. county pays out $50 MILLION PER MONTH in welfare to
illegals.
And yet hispandering Barack Obama and his banksters’
LA RAZA DEMS are at this very moment working for bit by bit amnesty.
In fact hispandering OBAMA just took 400 border
patrol guards off the border with NarcoMex. Pelosi, Feinstein and Boxer have
all vowed quick amnesty, NO WALL, no
e-verify, and NO ID for illegals to vote dem!
Who pays?
No comments:
Post a Comment