Tuesday, February 5, 2013

ALIPAC: The LA RAZA-OWNED Gang of Eight - DON'T LET THEM GIVE YOUR JOB TO AN ILLEGAL!

SEE OBAMA and MEXICO'S AMNESTY LIES AT BOTTOM

Americans for Legal Immigration PAC

AMNESTY LIES: WHAT OBAMA, MEXICO and LA RAZA DO NOT WANT AMERICANS (LEGALS) TO KNOW
 
THE OBAMA LIES ON IMMIGRATION REFORM – THE AMNESTY SCAM and HIS ASSAULT ON BLACK AMERICANS
OBAMA’S LA RAZA PROPAGANDA CRAP:
“Both plans called for a crack down on companies hiring undocumented workers and a path to secure citizenship for the 11 million undocumented workers in the United States”.
REALITY: OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA DEM PARTY of CORRUPTION HAS ASSAULTED E-VERIFY NATIONWIDE. HE MOVED TO BLOCK BY SUING THE AMERICAN STATE OF ARIZONA, NOW GATEWAY TO THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST FOR THE MEX DRUG CARTELS.
UNDER OBAMA, WORKFORCE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBTING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS PLUMMETED 70% DURING OBAM’S FIRST TERM, AND EXPECTED TO BE NON-EXISTANT HIS SECOND AFTER ILLEGALS REELETED HIM. DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, 2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILELGAL!
“What employers really want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage costs, experts say.”
 
*
UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
 
 
 
*
THANKFULLY NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS MORE THAN OBAMA! HE HAS REPEATEDLY REMOVED BORDER GUARDS WHILE THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS HAVE INVADED! THE DHS IS NOW THE DEPT. of HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP, AND AMERICAN’S JOB AND VOTING BOOTHS!
“The president’s plan also call for increased border controls, but the congressmen’s proposal would condition the citizenship path on the US certifying that it has indeed secured its borders”. 
*
43% OF ALL IMMIGRANTS END UP ON WELFARE. OF THE “CHEAP”LABOR FARM IMMIGRANTS BROUGHT IN TO EXPLOIT, TWO-THIRDS WILL END UP ON WELFARE!
 
“Because these immigrants are low wage and skilled, they may likely send their children to public school, rely on public clinics or hospitals when they are sick or some may resort to fraud in order to obtain some social welfare benefits, food stamps or other housing subsidies.”
*
Immigration Reform & the Leap Frog Effect
WASHINGTON, DC, January 31, 2013  - Tuesday, president Obama presented his proposal for a comprehensive immigration law package at a Las Vegas, Nevada high school.  His announcement came one day after a group of eight US Senators introduced guiding principles for a Congressionally-originated plan.  Florida Senator and Tea Party darling Marco Rubio, Former Presidential candidate Arizona Senator John McCain, New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez and Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, creator of the DREAM ACT, were among the 8 signatories to the principles. 
Both plans called for a crack down on companies hiring undocumented workers and a path to secure citizenship for the 11 million undocumented workers in the United States. The would-be beneficiaries include some who snuck across the Mexican-American border and about half who overstayed their visa authorization.  According to the plans, that almost mirror one-another, the immigrants would  have to pay back-owed taxes, wait for their green cards by standing in line behind those already undergoing the legal immigration process, learn English and pass criminal background checks. The president’s plan also call for increased border controls, but the congressmen’s proposal would condition the citizenship path on the US certifying that it has indeed secured its borders. 
 
Within the past two days, conventional talk has summarized doubt as to whether either package would get through the Republican-controlled House.  McCain acknowledged that his participation in the “Gang of 8” Senators proposing CIR has partially to do with the decreasing number of Hispanic voter support for his Republican party. 
Between the Gang of 8 and the Obama administration’s plans, combined with a plan House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner has been working on with other lawmakers, there could be some breakthrough this year….possibly. 
I foresee some consensus building and  likely relief for migrant workers, high-skilled, degree holding high tech immigrants and the perhaps for the  “DREAMERS”, named for the ACT that would have awarded a path to citizenship for the 4 million children of undocumented people brought to America by their parents. But there remain challenges for all else. 
Certainly, there are passionate members of the Republican base, which includes a nucleus of still quite powerful Tea Party members, who are strongly against any measure that could be interpreted as an amnesty.  Although Republican president Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to 2.6 million immigrants during his administration in the 80s, there is little support and appetite for it among many Republicans today still.  They say it awards law breakers, undermines the constitution and encourages additional and future illegal immigration. 
A recent University of Texas/Texas Tribune Poll revealed that 58 percent of mainline Republicans and 73 percent of Tea Party Republicans opposed the proposal. 
But the Tea Party may not be the only ones against CIR.  
Scholarly survey and anecdotal research suggest that some African Americans resent immigration reform because of a universal belief that every immigrant group that has come to the United States since the Emancipation Proclamation have been able to leap frog them socially, economically, and politically. There is a perception that the system is rigged against them in favor of immigrants. 
In a November 2006 issue of News Policy, author Gilbert Jonas writes about the stagnant state of black unemployment and underemployment in metropolitan regions nationwide: 
“Does immigration affect this pattern? Since the liberalization of immigration in 1965, about thirty-five million immigrants have reached our shores -- roughly equal to the entire African-American population today. With real unemployment (including those who have abandoned hope of a job) nearing ten percent, wages stagnant or worse, and unionization declining, common sense dictates that the steady flow of immigrants has impacted negatively -- and harshly -- on black workers, as well as on overall wage levels.” 
There is that looming dilemma and possible division. 
Also, personally, each day, when I drop my children at school, I sometimes stop by at a local 7-11 convenient store that is literally littered with and surrounded by loitering day laborers waiting around for a contractor, or construction managers, to pick them up for a day’s work. They would be paid under the table, work long hours, and not expect any benefits or extra pay for extra hours. Neither would they ask for nor expect the benefit of any time of labor relief that the laws require employers provide legal US employers. Their income goes into the Social Security trust fund or towards federal and state taxes that they never take back out because of their illegal status. 
Those unearned US benefits flip on the state and local level.
 Because these immigrants are low wage and skilled, they may likely send their children to public school, rely on public clinics or hospitals when they are sick or some may resort to fraud in order to obtain some social welfare benefits, food stamps or other housing subsidies. Undoubtedly, on a State and local level, they may be considered a drain on public tax-payer funded resources. 
Still, the jobs they take – as dishwashers, janitors, housekeepers, nannies, nursing home aides, maids, agricultural workers, are still seen as beneath many Americans – some of whom would rather stay home and collect unemployment than take such work. 
So in sum, it could be quite true that if granted a path to citizenship, this group would take advantage of the opportunities to work, to college and accomplish the American dream.  The very well may indeed leap frog African Americans’ progress.
 But they have always had the opportunity to attend public schools for free, pay attention, do well, excel and go to college on a federal Pell grant or get other federal loans or use their entrepreneurial spirit to open up a business, apply for and get a Small Business Loan. 
They cannot seriously blame another group for taking advantage of chances they’ve always had but failed to fully maximize. 
But of course they can and will. 
*
Judicial Watch
Mexicans Say Amnesty Will Boost Illegal Immigration…but isn’t that the Dems grand plan to keep wages depressed? HORDES AND HORDES OF HEAVY BREEDING MEXICANS?
last Updated: Wed, 10/14/2009 - 3:02pm
If President Obama keeps his promise of giving the nation’s 12 million illegal aliens amnesty it will encourage more Mexicans to enter the United States, according to residents of the struggling Latin American country who are undoubtedly rooting for the commander-in-chief’s plan.
The majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. are from Mexico therefore the president’s reprieve project will greatly affect that nation. Two-thirds of Mexicans say they know someone living in the United States and around one-third have an immediate member of their household or close relative living in the U.S. 
A majority of those residing south of the border say legalizing their undocumented countrymen will inspire more Mexicans to head north, according to a recent survey conducted by an internationally known polling and market research company. A vast majority of Mexicans with a relative in the United States said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally.
The results of the survey were made public this week by a research organization dedicated to studying the economic, social, fiscal and demographic impacts of immigration in the U.S. It reveals that nearly one-third of Mexican residents (nearly 40 million people) would like to live in the U.S. and if there was an amnesty a large number would come illegally with the hope of qualifying for a future exoneration. 
An amnesty, therefore, would stimulate more illegal immigration which is the last thing this country needs. Furthermore, rewarding those who have violated our nation’s laws with coveted U.S. residency and possibly citizenship demeans the system, especially for those who follow the appropriate steps to come lawfully. 
It’s bad enough that U.S. taxpayers annually dish out billions of dollars to educate, medically treat and incarcerate illegal aliens who are, in many cases, depleting local governments. Los Angeles County alone spends more than $1 billion a year, including $48 million a month in welfare costs, to provide services for illegal aliens. The crisis is hardly limited to border states, which have traditionally been the most impacted. Georgia’s skyrocketing illegal population costs taxpayers nearly $2 billion a year.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIALWATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.
Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.
The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.
In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.
As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”
*
 
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009

And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
*
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA – THE NATION HE SEEMS TO HATE!

No comments: