Nothing
about illegal immigration quite adds up… THIS MAY BE BECAUSE IT’S ONLY A SHAM!
OBAMA SAYS HE WANTS TO IMPLEMENT E-VERIFY IN THE NEWEST AMNESTY SCAM. BUT HE
HAS SABOTAGED IT NATIONWIDE. WORKPLACE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE
EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS PLUMMETED UNDER OBAMA 70%.
BORDER SECURITY IS VIRTUALLY
NON-EXISTENT.
*
LA RAZA PREFERS THE KIND OF MEXICAN
WELFARE STATE THAT THE DEMS HAVE CREATED IN MEXIFORNIA. IT COSTS LEGALS $22
BILLION PER YEAR, AND THE ILLEGALS STILL GET THE JOBS!
When
the Pew Research Center recently surveyed Latinos and asked whether they
preferred high taxes and big government or low taxes and small government, they
preferred high taxes and big government by a 75–19 margin.
Nothing about illegal immigration quite adds up.
Conservative corporate employers still support the idea of
imported, cheap, non-union labor — in a strange alliance with liberal
activists who want the larger blocs of Latino voters that eventually follow
massive influxes from Latin America.
Yet how conservative are businesses that in the past
flouted federal law — and how liberal are activists who undermined the
bargaining power of American minimum-wage, entry-level workers, many of them
minorities?
The remedies for illegal immigration under discussion are
just as incoherent. If the government now plans to offer some foreign
nationals a pathway to citizenship, does it also suddenly have the will to
determine who among illegal immigrants does not qualify for citizenship?
Millions of illegal immigrants have resided in the United
States for some time. They have not been convicted of crimes. And they have been
hard-working and self-supporting. But if the majority deserve a chance to
obtain legal residence and begin the process of citizenship, what about
others who would not qualify under those same considerations?
There is talk of reforming legal immigration as well.
Under the proposed system, from now on we would select most immigrants for
citizenship not by their place of origin, or by the fact of their prior
illegal residence in the United States, but on the basis of needed skill sets
and education and their willingness to wait in line legally.
Yet are loud proponents of “comprehensive immigration
reform” really willing to embrace the reforms they boast about? It might
spell the end of privileging millions from Latin America to enter the United
States without requisite concern about legality, education, English fluency,
or particular skill sets.
Massive illegal immigration is not ethnically blind or
based on education. For decades it has favored more proximate Latin American
arrivals who can easily cross the U.S.-Mexican border over those from distant
Asia, Africa, or Europe who simply cannot.
The politics of immigration are just as weird. Democrats, buoyed by the two election victories of Barack
Obama, now welcome large pools of new Latino citizens to vote en bloc for
Democratic candidates. But if the border were actually closed and
immigration were once again handled through a legal, systematic process, then
in time Latinos — in the pattern of Greek, Italian, and Armenian Americans —
would follow most other ethnic minorities and decouple their ethnic
allegiances from politics.
Republicans seem more confused. After needlessly bombastic
talk in the 2012 presidential primaries, they have gone to the other extreme
of emphasizing amnesties instead of enforcement — largely in efforts to
pander to growing numbers of Latino voters.
Here, too, paradoxes abound. Various polls suggest that
immigration was not the primary reason why Latinos voted overwhelmingly for
Barack Obama.
When the
Pew Research Center recently surveyed Latinos and asked whether they
preferred high taxes and big government or low taxes and small government,
they preferred high taxes and big government by a 75–19 margin. And they
usually see liberal Democrats as far better stewards of redistributionist
government, and Republicans more as heartless advocates of a capricious free
market.
Asian Americans, for whom illegal immigration is not
really an issue, voted for Democrats by about the same margins as did Latinos
— and perhaps because of similar perceptions of minority-friendly big
government.
Moreover, the largest concentrations of Latino voters are
in southwestern blue states such as California, New Mexico, and Nevada, where
Republicans usually lose anyway, and for a variety of reasons other than immigration.
Ironically, the best long-term strategy for Republicans would be to close the
border and allow the forces of upward mobility, assimilation, and the natural
social conservatism of Latinos to work.
Everyone talks grandly of passing bipartisan comprehensive
immigration reform as if the present system had not sprung up to serve the
needs of all sorts of special interests that certainly have not gone away.
We forget that too many employers still want
the cheap labor of foreign nationals.
The
Mexican government still promotes illegal immigration as a political safety
valve and a valuable source of cash remittances.
Too many ethnic activists, whose support derives from
large numbers of under-assimilated Latinos, don’t want to deport anyone and
do not welcome legal immigration redefined by ethnically blind, skill-based
criteria.
Democratic politicos don’t want closed borders, only to
see the melting pot someday turn their loyal supporters into independent
voters. And panicky Republicans simply have no idea what they want — other
than to cater to as many constituencies as they can.
The present system of immigration is far too often illegal
and immoral. But it is also weirdly rational in the way that it serves so
well so many lobbies — and so poorly the shared public interest at large.
— NRO contributor Victor
Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
His The Savior Generals will appear
in the spring from Bloomsbury Books.(c) 2013 Tribune Media Services, Inc.
|
Judicial Watch
Mexicans Say Amnesty Will Boost Illegal Immigration
If
President Obama keeps his promise of giving the nation’s 12
million illegal aliens amnesty it will encourage more Mexicans to enter the
United States, according to residents of the struggling Latin American country
who are undoubtedly rooting for the commander-in-chief’s plan.
The
majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. are from Mexico therefore the
president’s reprieve project will greatly affect that nation. Two-thirds of
Mexicans say they know someone living in the United States and around one-third
have an immediate member of their household or close relative living in the
U.S.
A
majority of those residing south of the border say legalizing their
undocumented countrymen will inspire more Mexicans to head north, according to
a recent survey conducted by an internationally known polling and market research company. A vast majority of Mexicans
with a relative in the United States said a legalization program would make
people they know more likely to go to America illegally.
The
results of the survey were made public this week by a research organization dedicated to studying the
economic, social, fiscal and demographic impacts of immigration in the U.S. It
reveals that nearly one-third of Mexican residents (nearly 40 million people)
would like to live in the U.S. and if there was an amnesty a large number would
come illegally with the hope of qualifying for a future exoneration.
An
amnesty, therefore, would stimulate more illegal immigration which is the last
thing this country needs. Furthermore, rewarding those who have violated our
nation’s laws with coveted U.S. residency and possibly citizenship demeans the
system, especially for those who follow the appropriate steps to come
lawfully.
It’s
bad enough that U.S. taxpayers annually dish out billions of dollars to
educate, medically treat and incarcerate illegal aliens who are, in many cases,
depleting local governments. Los Angeles County alone spends more than $1 billion a
year,
including $48 million a month in welfare costs, to provide services for illegal
aliens. The crisis is hardly limited to border states, which have traditionally
been the most impacted. Georgia’s skyrocketing illegal population costs
taxpayers nearly $2 billion a year.
*
ILLEGAL ALIEN POPULATION MAY BE AS HIGH AS 38 MILLION
Study:
Illegal alien population may be as high as 38 million A new report finds the
Homeland Security Department "grossly underestimates" the number of
illegal aliens living in the U.S. Homeland Security's Office of Immigration
Studies released a report August 31 that estimates the number of illegal aliens
residing in the U.S. is between 8 and 12 million. But the group Californians
for Population Stabilization, or CAPS, has unveiled a report estimating the
illegal population is actually between 20 and 38 million. Four experts, all of
whom contributed to the study prepared by CAPS, discussed their findings at a
news conference at the National Press Club in Washington Wednesday. James
Walsh, a former associate general counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization
Service, said he is "appalled" that the Bush administration, lawyers
on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and every Democratic presidential candidate,
with the exception of Joe Biden, have no problem with sanctuary cities for
illegal aliens. "Ladies and gentlemen, the sanctuary cities and the people
that support them are violating the laws of the United States of America.
They're violating 8 USC section 1324 and 1325, which is a felony -- [it's] a
felony to aid, support, transport, shield, harbor illegal aliens," Walsh
stated. Walsh said his analysis indicating there are 38 million illegal aliens
in the U.S. was calculated using the conservative estimate of three illegal
immigrants entering the U.S. for each one apprehended. According to Walsh, "In
the United States, immigration is in a state of anarchy -- not chaos, but
anarchy."
BOOK:
Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)
*
LOS ANGELES ANCHOR BABY WELFARE PROGRAM:
THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts
*
Where
To Go When Your Local Emergency Room Goes Bankrupt?"
THE QUESTION SHOULD BE WHERE DO ILLEGALS GO FOR
“FREE”MEDICAL.
During the past ten years 84 California hospitals have declared bankruptcy and closed their Emergency Rooms forever. Financially crippled by legislative and judicial mandates to treat illegal aliens have bankrupted hospitals! In 2010, in Los Angeles County alone, over 2 million illegal aliens recorded visits to county emergency rooms for both routine and emergency care. Per official figures, the cost is $1,000 dollars for every taxpayer in Los Angeles County.
During the past ten years 84 California hospitals have declared bankruptcy and closed their Emergency Rooms forever. Financially crippled by legislative and judicial mandates to treat illegal aliens have bankrupted hospitals! In 2010, in Los Angeles County alone, over 2 million illegal aliens recorded visits to county emergency rooms for both routine and emergency care. Per official figures, the cost is $1,000 dollars for every taxpayer in Los Angeles County.
http://justcommonsense-lostinamerica.blogspot.com/2011/03/where-to-go-when-your-local-emergency.html
*
THE
ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs
taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”
*
“The principal beneficiaries of our current
immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard
wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American
workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant
flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian
Science Monitor
“In the end, the unions only continue to stagger on at the behest
of a section of big business and the government, which believe the attacks on
the working class can be carried out more effectively by using the services of
union apparatus than without them.
This is what lies behind the unions’ support for President Barack
Obama and the Democratic Party, even as they collaborate with the Republicans
to slash social services, dismantle public education and attack the jobs,
living standards and social rights of the working class. A case in point is the
2009 auto bailout, where the UAW was handed a substantial ownership stake in GM
and Chrysler in exchange for agreeing to a 50 percent wage cut for new hires,
the elimination of the eight-hour day and other concessions.”
*
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by
70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully
belong to citizens and legal workers.
*
*
Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief).
Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in
Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who
hire illegal workers shall be repealed. From the date of enactment, the
Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo
it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit.
Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber
of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in
against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).
Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal
Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were
wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts
any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.
Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that
prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation
of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.” (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief,
p. 10). This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s
authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the
battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB
1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*
“The
president's straddling can work for the time being. But unless he wants to end
up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually have to hop on one horse and
lead the way. That would have to be the horse named "Enforcement
First." CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED WITH
HORDES MORE ILLEGALS LOOTING OUR COUNTRY
WHY THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS:
“What employers really
want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage costs, experts
say.”
*
UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF
ILLEGALS!
"We have a situation
where the job market — the bottom fell out, yet we kept legal immigration
relatively high without even a national debate," he said. "As a
consequence, a lot of the job growth has been going to immigrants."
Mr. Obama did take action
this year to grant many illegal immigrants up to 30 years of age a tentative
legal status that prevents them from being deported and authorizes them to work
in the United States.
Some Republicans in
Congress have criticized Mr. Obama's policy, saying it violates his powers and
will mean more competition for scarce jobs.
*
Guess LA
RAZA his happy with OBAMA’S endless hispandering! THEY SHOULD BE!
There are only eight states with a larger
population than LOS ANGELES COUNTY, where 47% of those with a job are ILLEGALS
USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS! This same mex gang infested county puts
out $600 million in welfare to illegals!
*
“The
inspections have determined that hundreds of companies throughout the U.S. have
significant
numbers of illegal immigrants on their payroll yet none have been punished, according to a Houston
newspaper that obtained internal ICE records through the Freedom of Information
Act. At least 430 audit cases listed as “closed” by the agency had high
percentages of workers with “questionable” documents yet they faced no
consequences.”
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN
IS TO CUT WAGES!
Is Illegal Immigration Moral?
By Victor Davis Hanson
11/25/2010
We
know illegal immigration is no longer really unlawful, but is it moral?
Usually
Americans debate the fiscal costs of illegal immigration. Supporters of open
borders rightly remind us that illegal immigrants pay sales taxes. Often their
payroll-tax contributions are not later tapped by Social Security payouts.
Opponents
counter that illegal immigrants are more likely to end up on state assistance,
are less likely to report cash income, and cost the state more through the
duplicate issuing of services and documents in both English and Spanish. Such
to-and-fro talking points are endless.
So
is the debate over beneficiaries of illegal immigration. Are profit-minded
employers villains who want cheap labor in lieu of hiring more expensive
Americans? Or is the culprit a cynical Mexican government that counts on
billions of dollars in remittances from its expatriate poor that it otherwise
ignored?
OBAMA'S AMERICA: Open
& Undefended Borders!
"What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans."
"What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans."
IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE THIS IS
REALITY, RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW, MAKE A TRIP TO MEX-INFESTED MEXIFORNIA! ALL
JOBS GO TO HISPANICS ONLY. THE STATE PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL
SERVICES TO ILLEGALS AND, ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY
HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS! VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY? THE LA
RAZA-CONTROLLED STATE LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS
TO USE E-VERIFY!
No comments:
Post a Comment