Nothing
about illegal immigration quite adds up… THIS MAY BE BECAUSE IT’S ONLY A SHAM!
OBAMA SAYS HE WANTS TO IMPLEMENT E-VERIFY IN THE NEWEST AMNESTY SCAM. BUT HE
HAS SABOTAGED IT NATIONWIDE. WORKPLACE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE
EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS PLUMMETED UNDER OBAMA 70%.
BORDER SECURITY IS VIRTUALLY
NON-EXISTENT.
LA RAZA PREFERS THE KIND OF MEXICAN
WELFARE STATE THAT THE DEMS HAVE CREATED IN MEXIFORNIA. IT COSTS LEGALS $22
BILLION PER YEAR, AND THE ILLEGALS STILL GET THE JOBS!
When
the Pew Research Center recently surveyed Latinos and asked whether they
preferred high taxes and big government or low taxes and small government, they
preferred high taxes and big government by a 75–19 margin.
|
Nothing about illegal immigration quite adds up.
Conservative corporate employers still support the idea of
imported, cheap, non-union labor — in a strange alliance with liberal
activists who want the larger blocs of Latino voters that eventually follow
massive influxes from Latin America.
Yet how conservative are businesses that in the past
flouted federal law — and how liberal are activists who undermined the
bargaining power of American minimum-wage, entry-level workers, many of them
minorities?
The remedies for illegal immigration under discussion are
just as incoherent. If the government now plans to offer some foreign
nationals a pathway to citizenship, does it also suddenly have the will to
determine who among illegal immigrants does not qualify for citizenship?
Millions of illegal immigrants have resided in the United
States for some time. They have not been convicted of crimes. And they have been
hard-working and self-supporting. But if the majority deserve a chance to
obtain legal residence and begin the process of citizenship, what about
others who would not qualify under those same considerations?
There is talk of reforming legal immigration as well.
Under the proposed system, from now on we would select most immigrants for
citizenship not by their place of origin, or by the fact of their prior
illegal residence in the United States, but on the basis of needed skill sets
and education and their willingness to wait in line legally.
Yet are loud proponents of “comprehensive immigration
reform” really willing to embrace the reforms they boast about? It might
spell the end of privileging millions from Latin America to enter the United
States without requisite concern about legality, education, English fluency,
or particular skill sets.
Massive illegal immigration is not ethnically blind or
based on education. For decades it has favored more proximate Latin American
arrivals who can easily cross the U.S.-Mexican border over those from distant
Asia, Africa, or Europe who simply cannot.
The politics of immigration are just as weird. Democrats, buoyed by the two election victories of Barack
Obama, now welcome large pools of new Latino citizens to vote en bloc for
Democratic candidates. But if the border were actually closed and
immigration were once again handled through a legal, systematic process, then
in time Latinos — in the pattern of Greek, Italian, and Armenian Americans —
would follow most other ethnic minorities and decouple their ethnic
allegiances from politics.
Republicans seem more confused. After needlessly bombastic
talk in the 2012 presidential primaries, they have gone to the other extreme
of emphasizing amnesties instead of enforcement — largely in efforts to
pander to growing numbers of Latino voters.
Here, too, paradoxes abound. Various polls suggest that
immigration was not the primary reason why Latinos voted overwhelmingly for
Barack Obama.
When the
Pew Research Center recently surveyed Latinos and asked whether they
preferred high taxes and big government or low taxes and small government,
they preferred high taxes and big government by a 75–19 margin. And they
usually see liberal Democrats as far better stewards of redistributionist
government, and Republicans more as heartless advocates of a capricious free
market.
Asian Americans, for whom illegal immigration is not
really an issue, voted for Democrats by about the same margins as did Latinos
— and perhaps because of similar perceptions of minority-friendly big
government.
Moreover, the largest concentrations of Latino voters are
in southwestern blue states such as California, New Mexico, and Nevada, where
Republicans usually lose anyway, and for a variety of reasons other than immigration.
Ironically, the best long-term strategy for Republicans would be to close the
border and allow the forces of upward mobility, assimilation, and the natural
social conservatism of Latinos to work.
Everyone talks grandly of passing bipartisan comprehensive
immigration reform as if the present system had not sprung up to serve the
needs of all sorts of special interests that certainly have not gone away.
We forget that too many employers still want
the cheap labor of foreign nationals.
The
Mexican government still promotes illegal immigration as a political safety
valve and a valuable source of cash remittances.
Too many ethnic activists, whose support derives from
large numbers of under-assimilated Latinos, don’t want to deport anyone and
do not welcome legal immigration redefined by ethnically blind, skill-based
criteria.
Democratic politicos don’t want closed borders, only to
see the melting pot someday turn their loyal supporters into independent
voters. And panicky Republicans simply have no idea what they want — other
than to cater to as many constituencies as they can.
The present system of immigration is far too often illegal
and immoral. But it is also weirdly rational in the way that it serves so
well so many lobbies — and so poorly the shared public interest at large.
— NRO contributor Victor
Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
His The Savior Generals will appear
in the spring from Bloomsbury Books.(c) 2013 Tribune Media Services, Inc.
|
*
THE WAR ON THE AMERICAN WORKER IS GOING WELL!
“Once again it is
clear that corporate America, special interests and the out-of-touch elites of
the Senate have little regard for truth, working Americans, the common good and
the national interest. The Democratic Party is now putting working Americans
and their families in the exact same position as the Republicans: last. This
Democratic-led Congress and this Republican President seem intent on pushing
middle-class Americans, and truth, into the shadows.” LOU DOBBS
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN THANK BARACK OBAMA FOR HIS OPEN
BORDERS, AND AGENDA OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY – BUYING THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES WITH OUR
JOBS AND ENDLESS GRINGO-PAID DREAM ACTS.
THE MEX OCCUPATION DEPRESSES WAGES FROM $300 TO $400 BILLION
PER YEAR, PARTICULARLY FOR BLACK AMERICANS, WHO ONCE AGAIN PERMITTED OBAMA TO
PUNK US DESPITE THE FACT HIS
ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, SUCH AS THE OUT GOING SEC.
OF LABOR, LA RAZA HILDA SOLIS!
DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, TWO-THIRDS OF ALL JOBS WENT TO
IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND LEGAL. THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S ENFORCEMENT OF
LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS WAS DOWN 70%.
VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY? NOW UNIONS ARE HISPANDERING FOR OPEN
BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY AND NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
UNIONS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN ORGANIZED CRIME. THEY’RE IN BED
WITH ANY SPECIAL INTERESTS OUT THERE, AND FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, THAT MEANS LA
RAZA SUPREMACY.
THESE CORRUPT UNIONS ARE NOW BELLYING UP TO THE U.S. CHAMBER
of COMMENCE, WHICH FRONT FOR BIG BUSINESS LOOTERS. THE CHAMBER SHOULD BE ANY
UNIONS’S WORST ENEMY.
THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE BEDS WITH OBAMA AND THE CORRUPT
DEM PARTY FOR OPEN BORDERS, ENDLESS HORDES OF HEAVY BREEDING MEXICANS. THE
CHAMBER, LIKE LA RAZA OBAMA, DEMANDS NO E-VERIFY, WHICH EFFECTIVELY WOULD END
ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS!
THE
ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs
taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”
*
“The principal beneficiaries of our current
immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard
wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American
workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant
flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian
Science Monitor
“In the end, the unions only continue to stagger on at the behest
of a section of big business and the government, which believe the attacks on
the working class can be carried out more effectively by using the services of
union apparatus than without them.
This is what lies behind the unions’ support for President Barack
Obama and the Democratic Party, even as they collaborate with the Republicans
to slash social services, dismantle public education and attack the jobs,
living standards and social rights of the working class. A case in point is the
2009 auto bailout, where the UAW was handed a substantial ownership stake in GM
and Chrysler in exchange for agreeing to a 50 percent wage cut for new hires,
the elimination of the eight-hour day and other concessions.”
The Administration's Phantom
Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very
little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and
gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the
flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner
as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American
Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano
declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama
administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of
illegal aliens already living in the United States.
Arguing the Obama
administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as
the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views
it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective
enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair
way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging that a lack of
confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce
the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to
gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American
public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For starters, the security
of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated
the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the
situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also
shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to
enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the
country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to
truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If Rep. Joe Wilson had been
in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had
a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on
the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of
Napolitano’s claims.
According to DHS’s own
reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are
secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to
have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607
miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s
stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.
The administration’s
strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical
as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a
strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of
immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The
department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of
immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent
fewer convictions.
While the official
unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office
in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement
strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The
administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them
with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the
payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no
adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the
illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of
fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing
to accept substandard wages.
In Janet Napolitano’s
alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control”
and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may
be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the
American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s
record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration
enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.
As Americans scrutinize the
administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find
little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The
first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second
– increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little
sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to
part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is
anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As Americans well know,
declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two
completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the
only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission
Aborted.”
*
Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped
precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday.
Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of
illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from
fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge
to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves
- but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the
Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top
Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil
is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take
jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com, JUDICIAL WATCH.org & WIKI-leaks
EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, FUNDING OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY, AND
HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
SHOCKING!
*
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by
70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully
belong to citizens and legal workers.
*
Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief).
Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in
Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who
hire illegal workers shall be repealed. From the date of enactment, the
Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo
it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit.
Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber
of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in
against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).
Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal
Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were
wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts
any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.
Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that
prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation
of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.” (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief,
p. 10). This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s
authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the
battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB
1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*
“The
president's straddling can work for the time being. But unless he wants to end
up in the sawdust, acrobat Obama will eventually have to hop on one horse and
lead the way. That would have to be the horse named "Enforcement
First." CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
FAIRUS.org
FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION REFORM
FAIR CHARACTERIZES THE OBAMA,
AND LA RAZA DEMS PLAN FOR AMNESTY AS FOLLOWS:
That's why, throughout 2009
FAIR has been tracking every move the administration and Congress has made to
undermine our immigration laws, reward illegal aliens and burden taxpayers.
· Foot-dragging on
proven methods of immigration law enforcement including border structures and
E-Verify.
· Appointment of several illegal alien advocates
to important administration posts.
· Watering down of
the 287(g) program to limit local law in their own jurisdictions.
· Health care
reform that mandates a “public option” for newly-arrived legal immigrants as
well as illegal aliens.
OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED WITH
HORDES MORE ILLEGALS LOOTING OUR COUNTRY
WHY THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS:
“What employers really
want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage costs, experts
say.”
*
UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF
ILLEGALS!
"We have a situation
where the job market — the bottom fell out, yet we kept legal immigration
relatively high without even a national debate," he said. "As a
consequence, a lot of the job growth has been going to immigrants."
Mr. Obama did take action
this year to grant many illegal immigrants up to 30 years of age a tentative
legal status that prevents them from being deported and authorizes them to work
in the United States.
Some Republicans in
Congress have criticized Mr. Obama's policy, saying it violates his powers and
will mean more competition for scarce jobs.
*
Guess LA
RAZA his happy with OBAMA’S endless hispandering! THEY SHOULD BE!
There are only eight states with a larger
population than LOS ANGELES COUNTY, where 47% of those with a job are ILLEGALS
USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS! This same mex gang infested county puts
out $600 million in welfare to illegals!
*
“The
inspections have determined that hundreds of companies throughout the U.S. have
significant
numbers of illegal immigrants on their payroll yet none have been punished, according to a Houston
newspaper that obtained internal ICE records through the Freedom of Information
Act. At least 430 audit cases listed as “closed” by the agency had high
percentages of workers with “questionable” documents yet they faced no
consequences.”
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN
IS TO CUT WAGES!
Is Illegal Immigration Moral?
By Victor Davis Hanson
11/25/2010
We
know illegal immigration is no longer really unlawful, but is it moral?
Usually
Americans debate the fiscal costs of illegal immigration. Supporters of open
borders rightly remind us that illegal immigrants pay sales taxes. Often their
payroll-tax contributions are not later tapped by Social Security payouts.
Opponents
counter that illegal immigrants are more likely to end up on state assistance,
are less likely to report cash income, and cost the state more through the
duplicate issuing of services and documents in both English and Spanish. Such
to-and-fro talking points are endless.
So
is the debate over beneficiaries of illegal immigration. Are profit-minded
employers villains who want cheap labor in lieu of hiring more expensive
Americans? Or is the culprit a cynical Mexican government that counts on
billions of dollars in remittances from its expatriate poor that it otherwise
ignored?
OBAMA'S AMERICA: Open
& Undefended Borders!
"What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans."
"What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans."
IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE THIS IS
REALITY, RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW, MAKE A TRIP TO MEX-INFESTED MEXIFORNIA! ALL
JOBS GO TO HISPANICS ONLY. THE STATE PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL
SERVICES TO ILLEGALS AND, ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY
HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS! VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY? THE LA
RAZA-CONTROLLED STATE LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS
TO USE E-VERIFY!
No comments:
Post a Comment