PLEASE SUPPORT NEBRASKA U.S. SENATOR DEB FISCHER AS SHE
SUPPORTS AMERICANS (LEGALS) AGAINST THE GROWING TIDE OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND
THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND THE
DEMS HAVE CREATED IN OUR BORDERS AND AT OUR EXPENSE.
Fischer will not support pathway to
citizenship for undocumented immigrants
U.S. Senator Deb Fischer says she cannot
support an immigration reform proposal that has a path to citizenship for
undocumented immigrants. A bi-partisan immigration reform proposal from a group
of eight Senators and President Obama's proposal both include a method for the
undocumented immigrants to meet certain requirements to be citizens. Fischer says while she is reserving judgement until she sees legislative language, she made it clear to reporters during her weekly conference call she cannot support a pathway to citizenship for people illegally in the country.
Fischer said, "We have a country that always supports the rule of law. Until we have undocumented immigrants stepping forward, we don't know who is in this country."
Fischer added." nce we start that process of some kind of legal status to have people in the country, we are going to have to deport people who are criminals."
Fischer said she was pleased the proposals do stress border security as one of their chief priorities.
*
*
“Through love of having
children, we are going to take over.”
AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN
BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY
2003: Mexican
population in U.S. reported to have increased 10 percent in just three years,
mostly as a result of illegal immigration. Mexicans encouraged to breed at all
costs. "A baby a year" Mexican pride slogan emerges
*
MEXICANS ARE LOOTERS.
MEXICANS ARE LOOTERS.
ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS
NEXT TO DRUGS ARE ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. LA RAZA DEM POLITICIANS ARE DOWN ON THE
BORDER WELCOMING PREGNANT WOMEN TO HOP OUR BORDERS FOR “FREE” ANCHOR BABY
BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE.
THIS CHILD OF ILLEGAL LOOTERS WILL
BE AN AMERICAN CITIZEN AND ALSO STILL A CITIZEN OF MEXICO.
THE LA RAZA POPULATION IS
EXPLODING! AMERICANS ARE BEING FORCED TO PAY FOR MEXICO’S ANCHORING OF THEIR
OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH – get on their
E-NEWS!
Mexican Drug
Lords Have U.S. Anchor Babies
A
Texas newspaper column known as “Narco
Confidential”
reveals that the women in a renowned Mexican drug lord’s family like delivering
their babies in the United States, further fueling the already heated anchor
baby controversy.
The
story comes up because last week the pregnant daughter of Joaquin “El Chapo”
Guzman, got busted trying to enter the U.S.
from Mexico at San Diego’s San Ysidro border crossing. Guzman is the head of
the Sinaloa Cartel and the U.S. government has offered a multi-million-dollar
reward for his capture. He’s considered one of the world’s most wanted drug
lords and his heavily-armed cartel controls trafficking along much of the U.S.
border with Mexico.
The
drug king’s daughter, Alejandrina Gisselle Guzman Salazar, wants to have a
U.S.-born child with automatic American citizenship and all the benefits that
accompany it. When illegal immigrants like Guzman Salazar have children in the
U.S., the kids are known as anchor babies. The term was adopted because the
U.S.-born children not only automatically qualify for a variety of benefits,
they provide permanent residency for immediate family members – mother, father
and siblings – and the link to future citizenship.
Guzman
Salazar admitted to federal authorities that she intended to go to Los Angeles
to give birth. She has been charged with fraud and misuse of visas, permits and
other documents. No further information has been provided about what will
happen to her.
Last
year El Chapo’s wife, Emma Coronel, gave birth to twin girls at a southern
California hospital. Other Mexican drug lords, such as Ramon Arellano Felix,
have sent family to the U.S. to give birth to anchor babies, according to news
reports. Clearly, the nation’s generous policies are being exploited by
hardcore criminals and American dream seekers alike.
This
has been going on for years and it’s not just our neighbors to the south
creating this anchor baby crisis in the U.S. The Chinese are doing it too. A large
number of upper-class Chinese women who have the resources to enter the country
legally, do so to deliver their offspring and essentially purchase American
citizenship. A loophole in American law allows the rich to travel to the United
States to give birth, according to a Chines anchor baby news report.
Not
surprisingly, most anchor babies are born to Mexican illegal immigrants. This
costs U.S. taxpayers astronomical sums just to educate them in the nation’s
public school system. In fact, a few years ago a study determined that Americans pay
around $52 billion to educate the children of illegal aliens and that the
figure is sure to skyrocket because the number of anchor babies nearly doubled
in just a few years and will likely keep growing. It costs the government tens
of millions more to provide the kids with welfare benefits like healthcare and
food stamps.
And
how do these anchor babies thank Uncle Sam for his generosity? They take him to
court! A few years ago dozens of anchor babies, represented by a coalition of
immigrant advocacy groups, sued
the U.S. government to
prevent their illegal alien parents from being deported. Only in America!
*
Drug lord’s family seems to like giving birth in the USA
Tuesday, October 16,
2012
The United States seems to be a good
place to be, if your dad or granddad is a big-time Mexican drug lord.
The news out of San Diego is that the pregnant daughter of Joaquin
“El Chapo” Guzman, Alejandrina Gisselle Guzman Salazar, was arrested trying to
enter the United States from Mexico at the San Ysidro border crossing. (See the
court paper posted below)
This comes on the heels of a report
last year that Guzman’s wife, Emma Coronel, gave birth to twin girls at a Los
Angeles area hospital.
Guzman is the reputed head of the
Sinaloa Cartel and the subject of a $5 million reward offered by the U.S.
government.
He is, without a doubt, the most wanted
man in the hemisphere.
Why would they do it? Being born in the
United States means automatic U.S. citizenship for the child, and as they grow
up, gives them the option of fleeing enemies in Mexico for the relative safety
of the United States.
The word is that other major drug
lord’s such as Ramon Arellano Felix, also sent family to the United States to
give birth.
SAN DIEGO- Alejandrina Gisselle Guzman
Salazar, who is the daughter of the leader of the cartel of Sinaloa “El Chapo”,
was detained on Friday at the San Ysidro entrance, accused of fraud, illegal
use of visas, permits and other official documents.
Guzman Salazar informed U.S.
authorities that her father was Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, which then the
officials alerted the Mexican authorities about the detention.
The two U.S. agents who made the
detention, only made declarations under the condition of maintaining themselves
as anonymous.
*
“A recent Pew poll indicated
that a very large percentage of Americans of Mexican descent regard themselves
as Mexicans. Not Mexican-Americans, not American-Mexicans. Just Mexicans.”
*
AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS – Comments
Posted on Washington Post
One of the reasons anchor
babies are such a burden to the US is the practice of chain migration. That
baby gets to bring in his parents, siblings and in some cases grand parents and
no one needs to be economically "sponsored" so all are eligible for
the welfare state bennies. Parkland
Hospital in Dallas recently went bankrupt due to the maternity ward where most,
perhaps all the babies were born to illegals and their cost of care never paid.
While it is quite understandable that some one from a poor country or any
country for that matter might like to give the gift of citizenship to their
offspring, it is the sole right of the sovereign nation to grant that gift. We
exploit the poor and undocumented and it is time to stop. Your cheap cleaning
lady or lawn guy is very expensive for the nation as a whole. Pay a living wage
for what you don't want to do and the problem may, in part, disappear.
3/30/2010 9:58:56 PM
*
An
argument to be made about immigrant babies and citizenship
GEORGE
F. WILL
Sunday, March 28, 2010; A15
A
simple reform would drain some scalding steam from immigration arguments that
may soon again be at a roiling boil. It would bring the interpretation of the
14th Amendment
into conformity with what the authors of its text intended, and with common
sense, thereby removing an incentive for illegal immigration.
To
end the practice of "birthright citizenship," all that is required is
to correct the misinterpretation of that amendment's first sentence: "All
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state
wherein they reside." From these words has flowed the practice of
conferring citizenship on children born here to illegal immigrants.
A
parent from a poor country, writes professor Lino Graglia of the University of
Texas law school, "can hardly do more for a child than make him or her an
American citizen, entitled to all the advantages of the American welfare
state." Therefore, "It is difficult to imagine a more irrational and
self-defeating legal system than one which makes unauthorized entry into this
country a criminal offense and simultaneously provides perhaps the greatest
possible inducement to illegal entry."
Writing in the Texas Review
of Law and Politics, Graglia says this irrationality is rooted in a misunderstanding of
the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." What was this
intended or understood to mean by those who wrote it in 1866 and ratified it in
1868? The authors and ratifiers could not have intended birthright citizenship
for illegal immigrants because in 1868 there were and never had been any
illegal immigrants because no law ever had restricted immigration.
If
those who wrote and ratified the 14th Amendment had imagined laws
restricting immigration -- and had anticipated huge waves of illegal
immigration -- is it reasonable to presume they would have wanted to provide
the reward of citizenship to the children of the violators of those laws?
Surely not.
The
Civil Rights Act of 1866 begins with language from
which the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause is derived: "All persons
born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States." (Emphasis added.) The explicit exclusion of Indians from
birthright citizenship was not repeated in the 14th Amendment because it was
considered unnecessary. Although Indians were at least partially subject to
U.S. jurisdiction, they owed allegiance to their tribes, not the United States.
This reasoning -- divided allegiance -- applies equally to exclude the children
of resident aliens, legal as well as illegal, from birthright citizenship.
Indeed, today's regulations issued by the departments of Homeland Security and
Justice stipulate:
"A
person born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic officer accredited to
the United States, as a matter of international law, is not subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States. That person is not a United States citizen
under the 14th Amendment."
Sen. Lyman Trumbull of
Illinois
was, Graglia writes, one of two "principal authors of the citizenship
clauses in 1866 act and the 14th Amendment." He said that "subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States" meant subject to its
"complete" jurisdiction, meaning "not owing allegiance to
anybody else." Hence children whose Indian parents had tribal allegiances
were excluded from birthright citizenship.
Appropriately,
in 1884 the Supreme Court held that children born to Indian parents were not
born "subject to" U.S. jurisdiction because, among other reasons, the
person so born could not change his status by his "own will without the
action or assent of the United States." And "no one can become a
citizen of a nation without its consent." Graglia says this decision
"seemed to establish" that U.S. citizenship is "a consensual
relation, requiring the consent of the United States." So: "This
would clearly settle the question of birthright citizenship for children of
illegal aliens. There cannot be a more total or forceful denial of consent to a
person's citizenship than to make the source of that person's presence in the
nation illegal."
Congress has
heard testimony estimating that more than two-thirds of all births in Los
Angeles public hospitals, and more than half of all births in that city, and
nearly 10 percent of all births in the nation in recent years, have been to
mothers who are here illegally. Graglia seems to establish that there is no constitutional
impediment to Congress ending the granting of birthright citizenship to those
whose presence here is "not only without the government's consent but in
violation of its law."
*
A recent Pew poll
indicated that a very large percentage of Americans of Mexican descent regard
themselves as Mexicans. Not Mexican-Americans, not American-Mexicans. Just
Mexicans.
OBAMA’S AMERICA: Open & Undefended Borders
AS HE SQUANDERS BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS
“What we're seeing is our
Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them.
Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens
now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal
alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may
obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your
children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
No comments:
Post a Comment