HOW OBAMA SOLD OUT AMERICANS (Legals) TO BUILD
HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS… Who gets the tax bills for all Mexico’s
looting?
·
·
Increased
welfare benefits for immigrants and their families;
·
Broad
family unification for extended family, including elderly grandparents;
·
Easier
requirements for skilled and unskilled foreign worker visas
·
Lenient
asylum regulations; and
·
To
appease Republicans, stricter penalties for employers who hire undocumented
immigrants.
Newsmax
Obama’s Immigration-Welfare Complex
Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:01 AM
By: James Walsh
President Dwight David Eisenhower, in his 1961 farewell address,
alerted the nation to the potential excesses of a military-industrial complex.
Today, the nation again faces potential excesses, this time linked to an
immigration-welfare complex being advanced by the administration of President
Barack Obama.
Now that Obamacare — itself a giant welfare program — has been
ruled constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court, the president appears ready to
tackle immigration.
The White House is leaking information that once the nation’s
fiscal problems are resolved, the next step will be comprehensive immigration
reform (CIR). This revelation is meant to quell the angst of the Hispanic
community.
If past is prologue, the president faces a struggle on his
immigration reform legislation. He need only consider the troubles that
surrounded the 1986 Immigration and Reform Act (IRCA) and the failed 2005-07
McCain-Kennedy attempt at comprehensive immigration reform. Each required
several years of hearings and legislative give and take before congressional
votes were taken — yea in 1986, nay in 2007.
U.S. Representative Solomon P. Ortiz, D-Texas, in unveiling The
Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of
2009 (CIRASAP), declared, “This is about ending illegal immigration . . .”
Obama had no interest in pushing immigration reform in the midst
of a re-election campaign; however CIRASAP, designed as a carrot for the 2012
Hispanic vote, was smart politics.
Just as Obamacare, despite the opposition of most U.S.
citizen-voters, became the cause célèbre of Obama’s first presidential term, so
immigration reform promises to be the cause célèbre of his second term, events
allowing. The president’s promises, other than those made to the radical left,
tend to be ephemeral.
Democrat-proposed immigration legislation will be far more liberal
than the McCain-Kennedy bill defeated by the overwhelming opposition of U.S.
citizen-voters, despite bipartisan support in the House, the Senate, and George
Bush’s White House. On December 10, 2012, Obama declared that comprehensive
immigration reform must contain a “pathway to citizenship” with the following
provisions:
·
Increased
welfare benefits for immigrants and their families;
·
Broad
family unification for extended family, including elderly grandparents;
·
Easier
requirements for skilled and unskilled foreign worker visas
·
Lenient
asylum regulations; and
·
To
appease Republicans, stricter penalties for employers who hire undocumented
immigrants.
The Obama bill will provide for presidential authority to control
immigration and nullify existing enforcement provisions. Under the guise of
increased border security measures, the bill will “increase oversight” of
border patrol agents to “protect” the “civil liberties” of those caught
entering or residing in the country without documents.
The U.S. Census Bureau’s demographic and population estimates
through 2030 project “high” immigration based on flexible government policies,
especially if Obama’s CIR is passed. The president’s open-door policy will
increase immigration numbers to unseen levels.
The Hispanic population is projected to increase to about 27
percent of the U.S. population by 2030. Such a projection appears low in light
of a contemplated open-door policy.
Meanwhile, the black population is projected to be about 12.5
percent, as it has remained between 11.5 and 13.5 percent for the last 70
years.
The Asian population may rise to about 7 percent, while the white
population is projected to continue decreasing to 49.9 percent. These Census
Bureau numbers do not account for 3.6 percent of the U.S. population, which may
be excused as governmental mathematical slippage or close-enough-for-government
work.
Just as the nation’s major immigration acts of 1965 and 1986 had
unintended consequences, so may the Obama legislation. Democrat efforts to use
immigration to “change” the USA into a socialist nation may succeed. An
official of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which supports
Obama’s CIR, is quoted as saying, “We expect a strong fight” from Republicans.
This is unlikely, as Republicans are in disarray without strong leadership.
Voting demographics have changed beyond comprehension. Hispanics
no longer vote in accordance with their values of family, faith, education, and
freedom. Those voting for Democrats in 2012 included young people, ages 18-29,
who put aside their concerns about high unemployment, underemployment, and
student loans.
Single women voted for Obama, apparently ranking social
entitlements above financial well-being, national solvency, and national
security.
The most dangerous voters, however, were the social-justice
automatons. Fed the pabulum of socialism and one-world communism by academic ideologues
and far-left clergy, they jumped aboard the ultra-liberal bandwagon. Among the
most fanatical were those Catholic do-gooders mesmerized into social-justice
zombies.
As public uproar over non-citizen voting in U.S. elections abates,
Obama Democrats appear to take a note from the 19th century railroad
tycoon Cornelius Vanderbilt. When asked by the press about public uproar over
his policies, Vanderbilt replied, “The public be damned.”
James H. Walsh was associate general counsel with the U.S. Department
of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1983 to 1994. Read more
reports from James Walsh — Click Here Now.
*
OBAMA
HAS PROMISED HIS LA RAZA “THE RACE” PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS AMNESTY, NO
E-VERIFY, NO I.D. FOR REQUIRED OF ILLEGALS VOTING… OR AT LEAST CONTINUED
NON-ENFORCEMENT!
OBAMA
HANDS MASSIVE WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, ALONG WITH OUR JOBS TO BUY THE ILLEGALS'
ILLEGAL VOTES!
THE LA RAZA PARTY EXPANDS THE DREAM
ACTS IN CA – LEGALS COULD NOT VOTE FOR THIS, BUT ARE FORCED TO PAY FOR IT!
*
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts
by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully
belong to citizens and legal workers.
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the
jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas,
co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
*
Newsmax
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday,
January 10, 2011 08:28 AM
The
truth about the DREAM Act
Published
March 20, 2012
The
DREAM Act has become a rallying cry for President Obama, members of his
administration, and liberal Democrats everywhere. President Obama has vowed to
“keep fighting for the DREAM Act,” which would grant amnesty to millions of
illegal immigrants.
It’s
true when listeners or those polled don’t know the facts that the DREAM Act has
some appeal. After all, we are all naturally sympathetic when children are
involved.
But
the descriptions of the DREAM Act voiced by President Obama and his cohorts are
not accurate. And the consequences are never told.
DREAM
Act supporters claim that only children would benefit from such a bill, but the
facts tell another story. Under most DREAM Act proposals, amnesty would be
given to individuals up to the age of 30—not exactly children. And some other
proposals don’t even have an age limit.
These
supporters also maintain that illegal immigrants can’t go college without the
DREAM Act. But the truth is that illegal immigrants can already go to college
in most states.
And
ultimately, most versions of the DREAM Act actually don’t even force illegal
immigrants to comply with all the requirements in the bill, such as going to
college or joining the military. The administration can waive requirements
because of “hardship”at its complete discretion.
DREAM Act proposals are
also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal immigrants will fraudulently claim they
came here as children or that they are under 30. And the federal government has
no way to check whether their claims are true or not.
Such massive fraud occurred after the 1986 amnesty for illegal
immigrants who claimed they were agricultural workers. Studies found two-thirds
of all applications for the 1986 amnesty were fraudulent.
(ANYONE THAT THINKS THERE ARE ONLY 11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN OUR
BORDERS SHOULD COME VISIT CA! LOOK AROUND AND TRY TO FIND A NON-HISPANIC
ENGLISH SPEAKING LEGAL! CA IS NOW 40% ILLEGAL. NEVADA IS NOW 33% ILLEGAL.
COLORADO IS NOW 20% ILLEGAL. AND LA RAZA IS NOW MOVING INTO THE AMERICAN SOUTH)
And
this amnesty did nothing to stop illegal immigration. In 1986, there were about
three million illegal immigrants living in the U.S. Today, there are an
estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. and about seven million of
them work here, unfairly taking jobs from unemployed Americans.
While DREAM Act
supporters claim that it would only benefit children, they skip over the fact
that it actually rewards the very illegal immigrant parents who knowingly
violated our laws. Once their children become U.S. citizens, they can petition
for their illegal immigrant parents and adult siblings to be legalized, who
will then bring in others in an endless chain.
This
kind of chain migration only encourages more illegal immigration, as parents
will bring their children to the U.S. in hopes of receiving citizenship.
President Obama tried to
get the DREAM Act passed during a lame duck session about a year ago but it
faced bipartisan opposition in Congress. This hasn’t stopped the administration
from passing its agenda. The Obama administration does everything it can to let
illegal immigrants stay here, which compounds the problem.
Political
appointees at the Department of Homeland
Security recently issued new deportation guidelines that amount to
backdoor amnesty and strike another blow at millions of unemployed U.S.
workers.
Under
the administration’s new deportation policy, DHS officials review all incoming
and most pending cases before an immigration court to determine if the illegal
immigrant can remain in the U.S. Since the administration has made clear that
many illegal immigrants are not considered priorities for removal, including
potential DREAM Act beneficiaries, this could open the door to allow millions
of illegal immigrants to live and work in the U.S. without a vote of Congress.
The Obama administration
has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants
to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal
workers. And the list goes on and on – this administration has a pattern
of ignoring the laws and intent of Congress.
The United States is based on the rule of law but the Obama
administration already has dirty hands by abusing administrative authority to
grant amnesty to illegal immigrants. The DREAM Act doesn’t stop illegal
immigration—it only encourages more of it by rewarding lawbreakers.
Rep.
Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee
SOARING POVERTY FOR AMERICANS… SOARING WELFARE AND OUR JOBS FOR LA RAZA
ILLEGALS!
600 HOMELESS CHILDREN UNDER OBAMA’S WHITE HOUSE NOSE, WHERE LA RAZA
OPERATES FOR AMNESTY AND CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT… while the County of Los
Angeles hands out $600 million per year in welfare to illegals, primarily
ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.
THIS
IS THE AMERICA THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BUILDING… NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN
AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)
*
600 children living in Washington, DC homeless shelter
By Naomi Spencer
14 February 2013
14 February 2013
Washington, DC, offers one of the starkest portraits of the social
crisis in America. At the District’s former General Hospital, a shelter for
homeless families houses 372 adults and some 600 children in tiny living
quarters. Families sleep with their scant belongings in areas barely bigger
than office cubicles.
The city’s homeless crisis has exploded since the onset of the
recession. Lack of work and unaffordable rent have pushed the number of
families living in the streets up by 74 percent in the past five years. Last
year alone, the number of homeless families rose 18 percent.
Advocates estimate that as many as 1,014 families in the city are
now homeless, a group that includes at least 1,600 children.
Applicants for rent vouchers face years-long waiting lists and a
safety net system that is terminally underfunded, understaffed, and overloaded.
“It’s like paperwork on top of paperwork—they have to prove they don’t have a
safe place to stay,” Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless attorney Marta
Beresin told the Washington Post in an article published February 11.
At the same time that homeless services are overwhelmed, the city
has a budget surplus of $417 million. Democratic mayor Vincent Gray recently
announced a $100 million budget for affordable housing, most slated for 10,000
senior and low-income housing units. Even with the funding, however, an
analysis by the DC Fiscal Policy Institute found the apartments may be
inadequately subsidized to help the poorest residents, especially those who are
homeless and jobless.
While poverty deepens in many neighborhoods of the nation’s
capital, D.C. has some of the highest rent rates in the country, a state of
affairs that is widening along with the income gap. Driving the high housing
costs is a tiny segment of the population, many working in government or
military services, who have seen their wealth soar. One in seven D.C. residents
fall in the top 5 percent of the income distribution, earning more than
$191,500 per year. A construction boom catering to this layer has produced
penthouses and luxury townhomes costing millions of dollars. Neighborhoods
across the city have seen their cost of living soar as a result.
The Washington Post notes that overcrowding in the D.C.
General shelter is due in part to a decision by the city to cut back on
subsidies to temporarily house homeless families in motels along New York
Avenue. This year, about 50 families are being put up in motel rooms, compared
to some 200 families last winter. The city spent $3 million on the
accommodations last year because of a law mandating that residents must be
sheltered in motels when the city’s emergency housing facilities are full and
the temperature is below freezing.
That arrangement produced crises for numerous families. Homeless
mothers living in the motels were warned by shelter officials that they could
be investigated by the child welfare agency for endangerment. Fearing that
their children would be taken away from them because of the precarious living
arrangements, many mothers left the homeless system altogether. This put
families into situations potentially more dangerous, including living out on
the streets and moving back in with abusive spouses or relatives.
At the General Hospital shelter, families face the misery of a
refugee camp. The Post describes parents struggling to bathe their
children in cold showers and feeding them poor-quality microwaveable food.
Residents are not allowed to cook or bring food that is not microwaveable. The
shelter provides only breakfast and dinner; its $300,000 lunch budget was cut
last year.
“Outside a few activity rooms, there is no real place to play,”
the Post notes. “For a few weeks last month, the heat went out in some
rooms, and there weren’t enough cribs for all the babies.” Legal aids have
pointed to the danger posed by the hard hospital floors for infants not
confined to a crib, noting that failure to provide safe bedding is a violation
of the city’s code. One mother who brought a crib too large to fit in her
allotted space was told to “go buy one,” according to the Washington Legal
Clinic for the Homeless.
“It’s like rock bottom for me,” said a 21-year-old mother of a
4-year-old. “I’m tired of seeing four walls. It’s like I’m in prison or
something.” A 37-year-old mother of five described sharing a room with all of
her children. “It’s stressful, it’s really stressful. Some days I literally sit
in the room and my kids are asleep and I’m sitting and just watching them,
feeling…I just feel displaced. My kids feel displaced.” The children do their
homework lying on their beds. “There’s no tables, no desks, no nothing…. I just
think about getting out of here.”
For fun, the children run through the empty halls of the hospital,
which was closed in 2001. Volunteers with a homeless youth advocacy group visit
a couple of times a week to provide activities. There is no playgound.
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless reports that since
January 7, D.C. General has been running at its full capacity of 271 family
units. The impact of the shelter being full has meant that “Families sleeping
in places like parks and cars with children when the temperature is just barely
above freezing will have no access to shelter.” Once it is spring, families
presently staying in the shelter will be turned out, meaning that “D.C.
children will once again go more than half a year without any emergency shelter
safety net, leaving them in dangerous settings.”
Many families are split up or rejected apparently because their
needs are too great for the shelter to meet. “A woman who was more than eight
months pregnant was turned away…and told to return when she delivered the
baby,” the Legal Clinic reported. “In multiple cases, the father of the
children, the fiancé of the mother or an over-18-year-old child was not allowed
to be placed with the family in the shelter.”
The Legal Clinic reported that the General Hospital has had heat
outages in many common areas and rooms since Christmas. “One client, who had an
infant daughter, reported that she had been requesting a space heater from
staff for three weeks to no avail,” the advocacy organization stated. She was
not moved to a room with heat until the organization confronted city’s housing department
about the problem.
Families have also reported that the building is “infested with
mice, bedbugs, and water bugs. Some families also reported being bitten by
spiders.”
This humanitarian catastrophe has been met by city officials with
indifference and denial. Mayor Gray, questioned by Washington Post
reporter Courtland Milloy about the Legal Clinic findings, declared, “I’m over
at that shelter all the time, and I don’t think anybody can credibly say that
we aren’t doing things to help the homeless.”
“I haven’t seen any bedbugs,” Gray said. “I’m always interacting
with those young people over there and, frankly, I’ve never seen any evidence
of what that advocacy group is talking about.”
*
2003: Mexican
population in U.S. reported to have increased 10 percent in just three years,
mostly as a result of illegal immigration. Mexicans encouraged to breed at all
costs. "A baby a year" Mexican pride slogan emerges
Congress
has heard testimony estimating that more than two-thirds of all births in Los
Angeles public hospitals, and more than half of all births in that city, and
nearly 10 percent of all births in the nation in recent years, have been to
mothers who are here illegally. GEORGE WILL on ANCHOR BABY WELFARE IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS
ANGELES
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH – get on their
E-NEWS!
Mexican Drug
Lords Have U.S. Anchor Babies
A
Texas newspaper column known as “Narco
Confidential”
reveals that the women in a renowned Mexican drug lord’s family like delivering
their babies in the United States, further fueling the already heated anchor
baby controversy.
The
story comes up because last week the pregnant daughter of Joaquin “El Chapo”
Guzman, got busted trying to enter the U.S.
from Mexico at San Diego’s San Ysidro border crossing. Guzman is the head of
the Sinaloa Cartel and the U.S. government has offered a multi-million-dollar
reward for his capture. He’s considered one of the world’s most wanted drug
lords and his heavily-armed cartel controls trafficking along much of the U.S.
border with Mexico.
*
AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS –
Comments Posted on Washington Post
One of the reasons anchor
babies are such a burden to the US is the practice of chain migration. That
baby gets to bring in his parents, siblings and in some cases grand parents and
no one needs to be economically "sponsored" so all are eligible for
the welfare state bennies. Parkland
Hospital in Dallas recently went bankrupt due to the maternity ward where most,
perhaps all the babies were born to illegals and their cost of care never paid.
While it is quite understandable that some one from a poor country or any
country for that matter might like to give the gift of citizenship to their
offspring, it is the sole right of the sovereign nation to grant that gift. We
exploit the poor and undocumented and it is time to stop. Your cheap cleaning
lady or lawn guy is very expensive for the nation as a whole. Pay a living wage
for what you don't want to do and the problem may, in part, disappear.
No comments:
Post a Comment