Friday, February 15, 2013

RUBIO VOWS TO HISPANDER MORE THAN OBAMA FOR ILLEGALS' VOTES In a Shift for GOP, Marco Rubio Demonstrates the Power of Spanish - NationalJournal.com

In a Shift for GOP, Marco Rubio Demonstrates the Power of Spanish - NationalJournal.com


HOW OBAMA SOLD OUT AMERICANS (Legals) TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS… Who gets the tax bills for all Mexico’s looting?


·          

·         Increased welfare benefits for immigrants and their families;

·         Broad family unification for extended family, including elderly grandparents;

·         Easier requirements for skilled and unskilled foreign worker visas

·         Lenient asylum regulations; and

·         To appease Republicans, stricter penalties for employers who hire undocumented immigrants.

 

Newsmax

Obama’s Immigration-Welfare Complex

Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:01 AM

By: James Walsh

President Dwight David Eisenhower, in his 1961 farewell address, alerted the nation to the potential excesses of a military-industrial complex. Today, the nation again faces potential excesses, this time linked to an immigration-welfare complex being advanced by the administration of President Barack Obama.  

 

Now that Obamacare — itself a giant welfare program — has been ruled constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court, the president appears ready to tackle immigration.

 

The White House is leaking information that once the nation’s fiscal problems are resolved, the next step will be comprehensive immigration reform (CIR). This revelation is meant to quell the angst of the Hispanic community.

 

If past is prologue, the president faces a struggle on his immigration reform legislation. He need only consider the troubles that surrounded the 1986 Immigration and Reform Act (IRCA) and the failed 2005-07 McCain-Kennedy attempt at comprehensive immigration reform. Each required several years of hearings and legislative give and take before congressional votes were taken — yea in 1986, nay in 2007.

 

U.S. Representative Solomon P. Ortiz, D-Texas, in unveiling The Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009 (CIRASAP), declared, “This is about ending illegal immigration . . .”

 

Obama had no interest in pushing immigration reform in the midst of a re-election campaign; however CIRASAP, designed as a carrot for the 2012 Hispanic vote, was smart politics.

 

Just as Obamacare, despite the opposition of most U.S. citizen-voters, became the cause célèbre of Obama’s first presidential term, so immigration reform promises to be the cause célèbre of his second term, events allowing. The president’s promises, other than those made to the radical left, tend to be ephemeral.

 

Democrat-proposed immigration legislation will be far more liberal than the McCain-Kennedy bill defeated by the overwhelming opposition of U.S. citizen-voters, despite bipartisan support in the House, the Senate, and George Bush’s White House. On December 10, 2012, Obama declared that comprehensive immigration reform must contain a “pathway to citizenship” with the following provisions:

·         Increased welfare benefits for immigrants and their families;

·         Broad family unification for extended family, including elderly grandparents;

·         Easier requirements for skilled and unskilled foreign worker visas

·         Lenient asylum regulations; and

·         To appease Republicans, stricter penalties for employers who hire undocumented immigrants.

The Obama bill will provide for presidential authority to control immigration and nullify existing enforcement provisions. Under the guise of increased border security measures, the bill will “increase oversight” of border patrol agents to “protect” the “civil liberties” of those caught entering or residing in the country without documents.

 

The U.S. Census Bureau’s demographic and population estimates through 2030 project “high” immigration based on flexible government policies, especially if Obama’s CIR is passed. The president’s open-door policy will increase immigration numbers to unseen levels.

 

The Hispanic population is projected to increase to about 27 percent of the U.S. population by 2030. Such a projection appears low in light of a contemplated open-door policy.

 

Meanwhile, the black population is projected to be about 12.5 percent, as it has remained between 11.5 and 13.5 percent for the last 70 years.

 

The Asian population may rise to about 7 percent, while the white population is projected to continue decreasing to 49.9 percent. These Census Bureau numbers do not account for 3.6 percent of the U.S. population, which may be excused as governmental mathematical slippage or close-enough-for-government work.

 

Just as the nation’s major immigration acts of 1965 and 1986 had unintended consequences, so may the Obama legislation. Democrat efforts to use immigration to “change” the USA into a socialist nation may succeed. An official of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which supports Obama’s CIR, is quoted as saying, “We expect a strong fight” from Republicans. This is unlikely, as Republicans are in disarray without strong leadership.

 

Voting demographics have changed beyond comprehension. Hispanics no longer vote in accordance with their values of family, faith, education, and freedom. Those voting for Democrats in 2012 included young people, ages 18-29, who put aside their concerns about high unemployment, underemployment, and student loans.

 

Single women voted for Obama, apparently ranking social entitlements above financial well-being, national solvency, and national security.

 

The most dangerous voters, however, were the social-justice automatons. Fed the pabulum of socialism and one-world communism by academic ideologues and far-left clergy, they jumped aboard the ultra-liberal bandwagon. Among the most fanatical were those Catholic do-gooders mesmerized into social-justice zombies.

 

As public uproar over non-citizen voting in U.S. elections abates, Obama Democrats appear to take a note from the 19th century railroad tycoon Cornelius Vanderbilt. When asked by the press about public uproar over his policies, Vanderbilt replied, “The public be damned.”

 

James H. Walsh was associate general counsel with the U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1983 to 1994. Read more reports from James Walsh — Click Here Now.



 

*

OBAMA HAS PROMISED HIS LA RAZA “THE RACE” PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS AMNESTY, NO E-VERIFY, NO I.D. FOR REQUIRED OF ILLEGALS VOTING… OR AT LEAST CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT!

OBAMA HANDS MASSIVE WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, ALONG WITH OUR JOBS TO BUY THE ILLEGALS' ILLEGAL VOTES!

 


 

 

THE LA RAZA PARTY EXPANDS THE DREAM ACTS IN CA – LEGALS COULD NOT VOTE FOR THIS, BUT ARE FORCED TO PAY FOR IT!


*

The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.

 


 

THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!

 

"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."

*

Newsmax

 

Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America

 

Monday, January 10, 2011 08:28 AM

 


 

The truth about the DREAM Act

 


 

Published March 20, 2012

 

·Text Size

 

The DREAM Act has become a rallying cry for President Obama, members of his administration, and liberal Democrats everywhere. President Obama has vowed to “keep fighting for the DREAM Act,” which would grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.

 

It’s true when listeners or those polled don’t know the facts that the DREAM Act has some appeal. After all, we are all naturally sympathetic when children are involved.

 

But the descriptions of the DREAM Act voiced by President Obama and his cohorts are not accurate. And the consequences are never told.

 

DREAM Act supporters claim that only children would benefit from such a bill, but the facts tell another story. Under most DREAM Act proposals, amnesty would be given to individuals up to the age of 30—not exactly children. And some other proposals don’t even have an age limit.

 

These supporters also maintain that illegal immigrants can’t go college without the DREAM Act. But the truth is that illegal immigrants can already go to college in most states.

 

And ultimately, most versions of the DREAM Act actually don’t even force illegal immigrants to comply with all the requirements in the bill, such as going to college or joining the military. The administration can waive requirements because of “hardship”at its complete discretion.

 

DREAM Act proposals are also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal immigrants will fraudulently claim they came here as children or that they are under 30. And the federal government has no way to check whether their claims are true or not.

 

Such massive fraud occurred after the 1986 amnesty for illegal immigrants who claimed they were agricultural workers. Studies found two-thirds of all applications for the 1986 amnesty were fraudulent.

 

(ANYONE THAT THINKS THERE ARE ONLY 11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN OUR BORDERS SHOULD COME VISIT CA! LOOK AROUND AND TRY TO FIND A NON-HISPANIC ENGLISH SPEAKING LEGAL! CA IS NOW 40% ILLEGAL. NEVADA IS NOW 33% ILLEGAL. COLORADO IS NOW 20% ILLEGAL. AND LA RAZA IS NOW MOVING INTO THE AMERICAN SOUTH)

 

And this amnesty did nothing to stop illegal immigration. In 1986, there were about three million illegal immigrants living in the U.S. Today, there are an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. and about seven million of them work here, unfairly taking jobs from unemployed Americans.

 

While DREAM Act supporters claim that it would only benefit children, they skip over the fact that it actually rewards the very illegal immigrant parents who knowingly violated our laws. Once their children become U.S. citizens, they can petition for their illegal immigrant parents and adult siblings to be legalized, who will then bring in others in an endless chain.

 

This kind of chain migration only encourages more illegal immigration, as parents will bring their children to the U.S. in hopes of receiving citizenship.

 

President Obama tried to get the DREAM Act passed during a lame duck session about a year ago but it faced bipartisan opposition in Congress. This hasn’t stopped the administration from passing its agenda. The Obama administration does everything it can to let illegal immigrants stay here, which compounds the problem.

 

Political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security recently issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor amnesty and strike another blow at millions of unemployed U.S. workers.

 

Under the administration’s new deportation policy, DHS officials review all incoming and most pending cases before an immigration court to determine if the illegal immigrant can remain in the U.S. Since the administration has made clear that many illegal immigrants are not considered priorities for removal, including potential DREAM Act beneficiaries, this could open the door to allow millions of illegal immigrants to live and work in the U.S. without a vote of Congress.

 

The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers. And the list goes on and on – this administration has a pattern of ignoring the laws and intent of Congress.

 

The United States is based on the rule of law but the Obama administration already has dirty hands by abusing administrative authority to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants. The DREAM Act doesn’t stop illegal immigration—it only encourages more of it by rewarding lawbreakers.

 

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee

 


SOARING POVERTY FOR AMERICANS… SOARING WELFARE AND OUR JOBS FOR LA RAZA ILLEGALS!

600 HOMELESS CHILDREN UNDER OBAMA’S WHITE HOUSE NOSE, WHERE LA RAZA OPERATES FOR AMNESTY AND CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT… while the County of Los Angeles hands out $600 million per year in welfare to illegals, primarily ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.

THIS IS THE AMERICA THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BUILDING… NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!


 

BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)


 

*

Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI)

600 children living in Washington, DC homeless shelter

By Naomi Spencer
14 February 2013

Washington, DC, offers one of the starkest portraits of the social crisis in America. At the District’s former General Hospital, a shelter for homeless families houses 372 adults and some 600 children in tiny living quarters. Families sleep with their scant belongings in areas barely bigger than office cubicles.

The city’s homeless crisis has exploded since the onset of the recession. Lack of work and unaffordable rent have pushed the number of families living in the streets up by 74 percent in the past five years. Last year alone, the number of homeless families rose 18 percent.

Advocates estimate that as many as 1,014 families in the city are now homeless, a group that includes at least 1,600 children.

Applicants for rent vouchers face years-long waiting lists and a safety net system that is terminally underfunded, understaffed, and overloaded. “It’s like paperwork on top of paperwork—they have to prove they don’t have a safe place to stay,” Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless attorney Marta Beresin told the Washington Post in an article published February 11.

At the same time that homeless services are overwhelmed, the city has a budget surplus of $417 million. Democratic mayor Vincent Gray recently announced a $100 million budget for affordable housing, most slated for 10,000 senior and low-income housing units. Even with the funding, however, an analysis by the DC Fiscal Policy Institute found the apartments may be inadequately subsidized to help the poorest residents, especially those who are homeless and jobless.

While poverty deepens in many neighborhoods of the nation’s capital, D.C. has some of the highest rent rates in the country, a state of affairs that is widening along with the income gap. Driving the high housing costs is a tiny segment of the population, many working in government or military services, who have seen their wealth soar. One in seven D.C. residents fall in the top 5 percent of the income distribution, earning more than $191,500 per year. A construction boom catering to this layer has produced penthouses and luxury townhomes costing millions of dollars. Neighborhoods across the city have seen their cost of living soar as a result.

The Washington Post notes that overcrowding in the D.C. General shelter is due in part to a decision by the city to cut back on subsidies to temporarily house homeless families in motels along New York Avenue. This year, about 50 families are being put up in motel rooms, compared to some 200 families last winter. The city spent $3 million on the accommodations last year because of a law mandating that residents must be sheltered in motels when the city’s emergency housing facilities are full and the temperature is below freezing.

That arrangement produced crises for numerous families. Homeless mothers living in the motels were warned by shelter officials that they could be investigated by the child welfare agency for endangerment. Fearing that their children would be taken away from them because of the precarious living arrangements, many mothers left the homeless system altogether. This put families into situations potentially more dangerous, including living out on the streets and moving back in with abusive spouses or relatives.

At the General Hospital shelter, families face the misery of a refugee camp. The Post describes parents struggling to bathe their children in cold showers and feeding them poor-quality microwaveable food. Residents are not allowed to cook or bring food that is not microwaveable. The shelter provides only breakfast and dinner; its $300,000 lunch budget was cut last year.

“Outside a few activity rooms, there is no real place to play,” the Post notes. “For a few weeks last month, the heat went out in some rooms, and there weren’t enough cribs for all the babies.” Legal aids have pointed to the danger posed by the hard hospital floors for infants not confined to a crib, noting that failure to provide safe bedding is a violation of the city’s code. One mother who brought a crib too large to fit in her allotted space was told to “go buy one,” according to the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless.

“It’s like rock bottom for me,” said a 21-year-old mother of a 4-year-old. “I’m tired of seeing four walls. It’s like I’m in prison or something.” A 37-year-old mother of five described sharing a room with all of her children. “It’s stressful, it’s really stressful. Some days I literally sit in the room and my kids are asleep and I’m sitting and just watching them, feeling…I just feel displaced. My kids feel displaced.” The children do their homework lying on their beds. “There’s no tables, no desks, no nothing…. I just think about getting out of here.”

For fun, the children run through the empty halls of the hospital, which was closed in 2001. Volunteers with a homeless youth advocacy group visit a couple of times a week to provide activities. There is no playgound.

The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless reports that since January 7, D.C. General has been running at its full capacity of 271 family units. The impact of the shelter being full has meant that “Families sleeping in places like parks and cars with children when the temperature is just barely above freezing will have no access to shelter.” Once it is spring, families presently staying in the shelter will be turned out, meaning that “D.C. children will once again go more than half a year without any emergency shelter safety net, leaving them in dangerous settings.”

Many families are split up or rejected apparently because their needs are too great for the shelter to meet. “A woman who was more than eight months pregnant was turned away…and told to return when she delivered the baby,” the Legal Clinic reported. “In multiple cases, the father of the children, the fiancé of the mother or an over-18-year-old child was not allowed to be placed with the family in the shelter.”

The Legal Clinic reported that the General Hospital has had heat outages in many common areas and rooms since Christmas. “One client, who had an infant daughter, reported that she had been requesting a space heater from staff for three weeks to no avail,” the advocacy organization stated. She was not moved to a room with heat until the organization confronted city’s housing department about the problem.

Families have also reported that the building is “infested with mice, bedbugs, and water bugs. Some families also reported being bitten by spiders.”

This humanitarian catastrophe has been met by city officials with indifference and denial. Mayor Gray, questioned by Washington Post reporter Courtland Milloy about the Legal Clinic findings, declared, “I’m over at that shelter all the time, and I don’t think anybody can credibly say that we aren’t doing things to help the homeless.”

“I haven’t seen any bedbugs,” Gray said. “I’m always interacting with those young people over there and, frankly, I’ve never seen any evidence of what that advocacy group is talking about.”

*

2003: Mexican population in U.S. reported to have increased 10 percent in just three years, mostly as a result of illegal immigration. Mexicans encouraged to breed at all costs. "A baby a year" Mexican pride slogan emerges

 

Congress has heard testimony estimating that more than two-thirds of all births in Los Angeles public hospitals, and more than half of all births in that city, and nearly 10 percent of all births in the nation in recent years, have been to mothers who are here illegally. GEORGE WILL on ANCHOR BABY WELFARE IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES

 

FROM JUDICIAL WATCH – get on their E-NEWS!

Mexican Drug Lords Have U.S. Anchor Babies

October 18, 2012 | No Comments

A Texas newspaper column known as “Narco Confidential” reveals that the women in a renowned Mexican drug lord’s family like delivering their babies in the United States, further fueling the already heated anchor baby controversy.

The story comes up because last week the pregnant daughter of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, got busted trying to enter the U.S. from Mexico at San Diego’s San Ysidro border crossing. Guzman is the head of the Sinaloa Cartel and the U.S. government has offered a multi-million-dollar reward for his capture. He’s considered one of the world’s most wanted drug lords and his heavily-armed cartel controls trafficking along much of the U.S. border with Mexico.

*

AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS – Comments Posted on Washington Post

One of the reasons anchor babies are such a burden to the US is the practice of chain migration. That baby gets to bring in his parents, siblings and in some cases grand parents and no one needs to be economically "sponsored" so all are eligible for the welfare state bennies. Parkland Hospital in Dallas recently went bankrupt due to the maternity ward where most, perhaps all the babies were born to illegals and their cost of care never paid. While it is quite understandable that some one from a poor country or any country for that matter might like to give the gift of citizenship to their offspring, it is the sole right of the sovereign nation to grant that gift. We exploit the poor and undocumented and it is time to stop. Your cheap cleaning lady or lawn guy is very expensive for the nation as a whole. Pay a living wage for what you don't want to do and the problem may, in part, disappear.

 

No comments: