Sunday, March 10, 2013

Jeb Bush Capitulates to LA RAZA SUPREMACY and Vows to Out Hispander Obama

ANOTHER BUSH CAPITULATES TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY – NEXT MOVE IS TO HISPANDER LIKE AN OBAMAnation AND PROMISE MUCHO GRINGO-PAID LA RAZA WELFARE, “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING=18 YEARS of WELFARE, AND A GRINGO JOB FOR EVERY ILLEGAL THAT VOTES!

Jeb Bush: I'm 'in Sync' With Lindsey Graham on Immigration Reform

By George Stephanopoulos | ABC OTUS News – 2 hrs 22 mins ago

During an interview for "This Week," former Florida governor Jeb Bush told me that he was "in sync" with South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on the issue of immigration reform.

Graham, a key member of the bipartisan group of senators pushing for immigration reform, took Bush to task after the former Florida governor said Monday that he did not support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, which is a key component of the plan being pushed by the Senate group. Bush subsequently reversed course and said he could in fact support a plan that included a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants already living in the United States.

"Senator Graham and I talked. He was responding to concerns that were expressed before the book was actually published," Bush said. "I told him that I support his efforts and I applaud what he's doing. And he concluded, after he heard what the thesis of the book is that we're in sync. We're on the same - on the same path."

"The basic premise needs to be that coming to the country legally should be easier with less cost than coming to the country illegally. And if you can create a system like that as is being discussed in the Senate and in the House- through a path to citizenship, that's fine," Bush said. "But my guess is that will take a long, long time to achieve. In the interim, it's important to take people out from the shadows to allow them to have- the dignity of being- having legal status."

Florida governor Jeb Bush told me that he was "very encouraged" about the possibility of comprehensive immigration reform - a legislative achievement that has eluded lawmakers for more than a decade - becoming law by the end of the year.

"I'm very encouraged. There are some big sticking points about how do you deal with making sure that there's enough seasonal workers, temporary worker programs that have been quite successful in the past," Bush said. "There's a lot of work being done, really good work, courageous work, 'cause this is complex and may not be popular, but I think it's- it is possible that comprehensive reform can be done."

Turning to President Obama's new effort to reach out to his colleagues on right - which included inviting the GOP's 2012 vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan to lunch - Bush complimented the president, comparing his actions to those of Ronald Reagan, an icon of the Republican Party.

"I'm very encouraged by the fact the president is trying to restore some personal connection with policymakers in Congress. I'm at the Reagan Library today and that's kind of what Ronald Reagan did. He didn't scorn his adversaries, he embraced them and got a lot done," Bush said. "This is very positive in my mind. It makes it harder to reach agreement when there's not trust. It's just human nature. And so this is maybe a good, positive first step."

Bush qualified his praise for the president, tweaking him for a lack of "seriousness" when it came to the president's efforts to reach a deal to reduce the national debt and specifically his willingness to embrace entitlement reform as part of a potential bargain with Republicans.

"I haven't seen the seriousness of the president's efforts. I'd love to see a specific plan that really did reform- bend the cost curve for Medicare and the entitlement system. I haven't seen it, so if there is through these talks, some kind of consensus that emerged, I don't think you should say, 'no, no, no' about anything'" Bush said.

"Frankly, there was already been one of the largest tax increases in American history a month ago. And frankly, we ought to be focused on sustained economic growth, which grows more revenue for people and for government than any tax increase that's been suggested, so there are a lot of things that could be done to create a real grand bargain. And let the process work. I'm hopeful that the president's sincere about this," Bush said.

Bush also insisted during out conversation that he is not positioning himself for a 2016 presidential run as he promotes his new book "Immigration Wars," even as speculation grows that he aims to be the third member of the Bush family to occupy the oval office.

"I'm not viewing this as a political reentry either. I just don't view it that way," Bush said. "Everything's viewed with a political lens in Washington and that's just the nature of the beast and it is what it is."

*
IN REALITY MEXICANS LOATHE THIS NATION AND HAVE NO DESIRE TO BECOME AMERICANS. THEY SIMPLY JUMP OUR BORDERS TO LOOT. HERE’S WHAT LA RAZA WANTS FIRST:
“ Under his proposal, illegal immigrants would receive amnesty in the sense of permanent status — work cards, Social Security numbers, driver’s licenses, and so forth — but not a path to citizenship”
Posted on by Paul Mirengoff in Immigration, Republicans
Jeb Bush and amnesty lite

Jeb Bush has come up with a compromise approach to immigration reform. Under his proposal, illegal immigrants would receive amnesty in the sense of permanent status — work cards, Social Security numbers, driver’s licenses, and so forth — but not a path to citizenship. Citizenship would only be available if they left the U.S. and applied from their home country, a course of action few would be likely to take.
 
Bush would also try to secure the border. However, as I understand it, a certification of “success” in this endeavor would not be a prerequisite for the amnesty.

In theory, amnesty but no path to citizenship is a sensible compromise. We aren’t going to deport many illegal aliens under any regime; nor do I believe that mass deportation would, on balance, be a desirable policy. For me, the deal breaker on immigration reform is not amnesty per se, but rather rewarding illegal aliens with United States citizenship.

But Mark Krikorian argues that Bush’s compromise is a ruse that will pave the way for an eventual grant of citizenship:

Once the illegal population is legalized, the game is over — the amnesty will obviously never be revoked, and the Democrats will then launch a campaign against Republicans accusing them (correctly) of imposing on helpless Latinos a Jim Crow–style system of second-class status, something more appropriate to Saudi Arabia. If they go this way, the GOP candidate in 2016 will look back fondly on Romney’s 27 percent of the Hispanic vote — and he’ll have sabotaged his own base as well, resulting in an even further drop in blue-collar white turnout and Republican share.

I agree that Bush probably is trying to pull a fast one. He has long backed a path to citizenship for illegal aliens. So why the change, just as momentum is building for such a path? Bush supplied part of the answer when he told Charlie Rose that he wrote the book last year (i.e., before the momentum began to build). However, Bush continues to offer his compromise because, I suspect, he has an eye on the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. Most likely, his true preference remains a path to citizenship for illegals, but he understands that this is a unacceptable to most Republicans.

On the merits, Krikorian is also correct that it would be quite difficult to hold the line at “amnesty lite.” But it is already proving difficult to resist legislation that would provide illegal immigrants with a path to citizenship.

Depending on the exact lay of the legislative land, it might make sense to accept a compromise that, for now, denies the path to citizenship. Who knows? Republicans may one day behave like a serious political party — one that rewards the people who vote for it, not those who vote against it — rather than like masochists.

As for Bush’s proposal to proceed with amnesty before the border is certified as secure, it doesn’t bother me that much. The certification process will likely be a sham, in all events. And to the extent that there’s any progress in border security in the run-up to certification, that progress will always be subject to reversal.

Finally, as I understand it, the illegal immigrants to whom Bush would deny a path to citizenship are those who entered the U.S. illegally as adults and who choose to remain in the U.S. rather than return to their native countries to go through the lawful immigration process. Those who accompanied them as children would have path to citizenship. This represents a huge reward — on top of amnesty — for the adults who entered illegally. In my view, it is problematic.

*
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America  


*
Immigrating America Into a Colony of Mexico

We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico. With 9.2 million Mexicans now living in America, their goal of colonizing our country back into Mexico moves forward. A more sobering reality stems from the evidence that it’s Mexican-American citizens in the forefront of this disintegration of our country. 

Americans (Legals) have become a passive society while Mexico loots and occupies.
Here’s what the Democrat Party and Mexico have done to CA.

CALIFORNIA: MEXICO’S LOOTED WELFARE STATE

*
Importing Poverty: Immigration and Poverty in the United States: A Book of Charts
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/01/americas-biggest-imports-from-mexico.html


By Robert Rector
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.

 

*

THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/03/assualt-on-american-worker-joe-legal-vs.html
 

"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."

 

 

 

 

No comments: