UK - BUT IT'S
AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PICTURE IN MEX-OCCUPIED AND LOOTED U.S.
DURING
OBAMA'S FIRST TERM 2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.
WORKPLACE
ENFORCEMENT PLUMMETED 70% AND OBAMA SETABOUT SABOTAGING E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE
ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS.
MEANWHILE THE
LA RAZA 'THE RACE" WELFARE STATE HAS EXPANDED TO ALL 50 STATES.
WE ARE
MEXICO'S JOBS, WELFARE AND JAILS SYSTEM.
Under his plans, access to Britain's National
Health Service will be curbed, new migrants will have to wait up to five years
for social housing, fines for employers who hire illegal workers will be
doubled, and landlords who let to illegal immigrants could face fines too.
Britain's PM
Cameron unveils sweeping immigration crackdown
By Andrew Osborn
LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron will unveil
a sweeping immigration crackdown on Monday aimed at discouraging migrants from
Romania and Bulgaria from moving to Britain when EU restrictions on their right
to travel and work there expire next year.
Under his plans, access to Britain's National Health Service
will be curbed, new migrants will have to wait up to five years for social
housing, fines for employers who hire illegal workers will be doubled, and
landlords who let to illegal immigrants could face fines too.
The lifting of European Union freedom of movement
restrictions on Romanians and Bulgarians has triggered warnings in the
right-leaning press of "hordes" of welfare-hungry migrants descending
on Britain at a time when the economy is stagnant and public resources are
being squeezed.
Cameron's initiative reflects a change in the political
mainstream after years of politicians shying away from the issue. All three
main parties now talk tough on immigration after polls showed it had become one
of voters' main worries ahead of a 2015 election and a once derided
anti-immigration party surged in the polls.
In a speech that may stir controversy in Romania and
Bulgaria, Cameron will say he wants to stop Britain's welfare system being
"a soft touch" for migrants, saying that access to core public
services is something newcomers should earn rather than automatically receive.
"Net migration needs to come down radically from
hundreds of thousands a year to just tens of thousands," he will say,
outlining measures that will apply to other EU nationals too.
The UK Independence Party or UKIP, has thrived in the polls
after campaigning against "open-door" immigration, humiliating
Cameron's ruling Conservative party in a vote for a parliamentary seat three
weeks ago.
Cameron is expected to say: "While I have always
believed in the benefits of immigration I have also always believed that
immigration has to be properly controlled.
"As I have long argued, under the last government this
simply wasn't the case. Immigration was far too high and badly out of
control."
"SOMETHING FOR NOTHING CULTURE"
IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, ILLGALS COLLECT $600 MILLIION PER YEAR IN WELFARE, PRIMARILY
ANCHOR BABY BREEDING. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO TALK ABOUT CURBING MEXICAN
LOOTING. IN FACT, ILLEGALS ARE ELECTING LA RAZA SUPREMACIST TO THE STATE
LEGISLATURE TO PASS BILL AFTER BILL BENEFITING ILLEGALS. THE LAST WAS A LAW
THAT PROHIBITS EMPLOYERS FROM USING E-VERIFY.
He will announce new measures to make it more difficult for
nationals from the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes Romania and
Bulgaria, to claim welfare benefits after six months. They will take effect in
early 2014.
He will also promise to close a loophole that allows some
people who have no right to work in Britain to claim benefits and subject
newcomers to a much harder test to see if they are eligible for income-related
benefits.
"Ending the something for nothing culture needs to
apply to immigration as well as welfare. We're going to give migrants from the
EEA a very clear message. Just like British citizens, there is no absolute
right to unemployment benefit," he will say.
Under the plans, newcomers would also have to wait for up to
five years before they could join a waiting list for social housing, and face
"stricter charging" to use the health service or be obliged to have
private health insurance.
"We should be clear that what we have is a free
National Health Service, not a free International Health Service," Cameron
will say.
His initiative has already been criticized by David Walker,
the Bishop of Dudley, who told The Observer newspaper that politicians were
exaggerating the immigration problem and considering
"disproportionate" measures.
Last Friday, Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister and
leader of the Liberal Democrat party, the junior member of Cameron's coalition,
said Britain was considering obliging visitors from "high-risk"
countries to hand over a returnable cash bond to deter them from overstaying
their visas.
He also abandoned a promise to amnesty illegal immigrants
after ten years.
Nigel Farage, the leader of UKIP, said on Saturday that the
unexpected success of his own party had shifted the debate on immigration.
"If UKIP had not taken on this immigration debate, the
others would not be talking about it at all," he told his party conference.
(Editing by Robin Pomeroy)
*
IS
THE SAME THING HAPPENING IN AMERICA? ARE COMMUNITIES SO OVERRUN BY MEXICANS
THAT ONE ONY HEARS SPANISH, AND ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO SEE THE MEX FLAG WAVING
THAN ANY AMERICAN?
IN LA
RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES, AT THE SANTEE EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX, A PUBLIC HIGH
SCHOOL WHERE THE STUNDENTS ARE OVERWHELMINGLY ILLEGALS OR ANCHORS, CLASSES ARE
TAUGHT IN SPANISH, BOOKS AND HANDOUTS ARE IN SPANISH AND STUDENTS SIT ON THEIR WELL-FED
ASSES WHEN THE AMERICAN NATIONAL ANTHEM IS PLAYE AND SCHOOL ASSEMBLIES END IN
VIVA MEXICO! VIVA MEXICO!
TYPICALLY
AT AMERICA’S EXPENSE, MEXICANS ARE BREEDING A POPULATION EXPLOSIONG. LOS
ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLGALS,
PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE!
*
YOU
WILL NOT FIND THE FOLLOWING BELOW IN AMERICA WHERE THE LA RAZA DEMS ARE
OPEN-HANDED IN HANDING LA RAZA DREMA ACTS OF WELFARE, OUR JOBS, HIGHER
EDUCATION DISCOUNTS, FREE LOWER EDUCATION, OBAMAcare, FREE EMERGENCY ROOM CARE
AT ANY FREE ENTERPRISE HOSPITAL AND ANCHOR BABY WEFLARE!
British
taxpayers do not owe immigrants a living through benefits, warns Cameron as he
announces restricted access to health care and housing
- New EU migrants will be stripped of jobless benefits after six months
- Part of a raft of new measures announced by David Cameron
- He plans to restrict access to healthcare, social housing and handouts
- He says that net migration to the UK needs to 'come down
radically'
- Bishop of Dudley: Immigration fears 'bear little relationship' to
reality
By Matt Chorley and Jason Groves
Britain's benefits system is to be
overhauled to end the idea that it will payout to anyone who moves here, David
Cameron pledged today. (“FREE” EMERGENCY
ROOM CARE AT CA HOSPLITALS ALONE COST $1.4 BILLION PER YEAR! MEXICO’S “FREE”
MEDICAL IS A BIT COSTLY!)
Housing, health and unemployment support will
be restricted to people who have lived in the UK for several years or can prove
they are entitled to state-funded help.
Mr Cameron used a major speech at University
Campus Suffolk in Ipswich in Suffolk to promise to 'strengthen' tests to ensure
only those who have paid into the system are able to receive handouts.
But the much-trailled crackdown was dismissed
by critics who argued that many of the limits on benefits were already in place
and the real fear for many in the UK was the threat posed to jobs by an influx
of cheap labour.
Prime Minister David Cameron used a speech at
the University Campus Suffolk in Ipswich to unveil a raft of measures to deter
migrants from coming to Britain
Mr pledged to end end Britain’s ‘something
for nothing’ reputation, although a more radical plan to ban new arrivals from
claiming benefits at all in their first year was dropped for fear of breaching EU
law.
Mr Cameron claimed net migration needs to
‘come down radically’ after getting ‘badly out of control’ under Labour.
He said: 'Right now the message through the
benefit system is all wrong.
More...
'It says if you can’t find a job or drop out
of work early, the British taxpayer owes you a living for as long as you like
no matter how little you have contributed to social security since you arrived.
'My view is simple. Ending the something for
nothing culture needs to apply to immigration as well as welfare.'
The Prime Minister said rules on accessing
benefits, housing and health would be tightened
Mr Cameron claimed that the message from the
benefit system is 'all wrong' and encouraged foreigners to think they could
live off the British state
AT-A-GLANCE: KEY POINTS
FROM THE PM'S IMMIGRATION SPEECH
David Cameron set out a raft of ideas in his
speech on immigration today. They include:
Housing
Councils to introduce a local residency test,
which will mean someone would have to live in an area for 2 or 5 years before
they can join the waiting list for social housing.
Residence test
The Habitual Residence Test, which decides if
someone is eligible to claim income-related benefits, will be toughened with
more emphasis on being able to speak English.
Jobless benefits
New rules from January 2014 will mean that
after six months anyone from the European Economic Area — the EU plus Iceland,
Liechtenstein and Norway — will lose out of work benefits if they cannot prove
they are on the verge of getting a job. But critics point out that anyone who
is unemployed now faces sanctions if they claim benefits for more than six
months.
Outstaying visas
A loophole means someone can claim benefits
even once their visa has expired, if they have paid National Insurance
contributions. This will be closed so someone with no right to work in
the UK cannot receive state help.
Health
Ministers will look to introduce stricter
charging for NHS services or require people from outside the EEA to have
private health insurance.
Illegal immigration
Fines for gangmasters and business which
employ illegal immigratnts to double to £20,000. Landlords will have to check
the migration status of new tenants, so they are not renting to an illegal
immigrant.
The centrepiece of his reforms is a limit of
six months on the right of EU nationals to claim out-of-work benefits.
From January, those who cannot show they are
on the verge of securing a job will have their benefits stopped.
But Chris Bryant, Labour's shadow immigration
minister, said such restrictions were already in place.
He said current regulations say that EU
migrants cannot claim benefits after six months if they are not ‘genuinely
seeking work and have a reasonable chance of being engaged’.
Mr Cameron said migrants can only claim after
six months if ‘they can prove not just that you are genuinely seeking
employment but also that you have a genuine chance of getting a job’.
Mr Bryant said: 'It’s exactly the same, isn’t
it, there’s no difference at all, this isn’t a new announcement.'
The Prime Minister also unveiled a crackdown
on so-called health tourism, with hospitals ordered to start charging foreign
visitors. Those from outside the EU will need health insurance before being
granted a visa.
There will be a major shake-up of council
housing rules designed to keep immigrant families off waiting lists for at
least two years and possibly as many as five.
Town halls will have to stop allowing
migrants to jump the queue – last year around 32,000 of the 360,000 available
council homes went to foreigners.
Mr Cameron said: 'New
migrants should not expect to be given a home on arrival.
'And yet at present almost one in ten new
social lettings go to foreign nationals.
'So I am going to introduce new statutory
housing allocations guidance this spring to create a local residence test.
'This should mean that local people rightly
get priority in the social housing system.
'And migrants will need to have lived here
and contributed to this country for at least two years before they can
qualify.'
The measures were described as ‘amongst the
toughest in the world’ by immigration minister Mark Harper.
They are a response to public fears of an
influx of thousands of migrants from Romania and Bulgaria when movement
restrictions are lifted at the end of this year.
The Government is also anxious about growing
support for the UK Independence Party, which has fed on concern about the
impact of mass immigration.
There is nothing however in the proposals to
stops migrants travelling here from the poorer parts of Eastern Europe.
The bid to cap eligibility for benefits to
six months will put the Government on collision course with Brussels, which
zealously guards the right to free movement across Europe.
Ministers will make the case that after six
months migrants will have ‘exhausted’ their right to look for work in this
country.
Sources say they are confident of winning an
expected legal challenge at the European Court of Justice.
The Government will also seek to close a
loophole which enables illegal over-stayers to continue claiming benefits when
their visas expire.
And ministers will try to toughen up the
rules on the habitual residency test which governs how quickly migrants
can start claiming in-work benefits such as tax credits.
VIDEO Watch
Cameron's speech warning migrants of tougher new rules
Cameron toughens up on migrants seeking
handouts
EU migrants will be stripped of jobless
benefits under the plans to be outlined by David Cameron
The plans could cause a clash with Brussels,
which protects the right to free travel across Europe
David Walker, Bishop of Dudley, said
immigration fears bear 'little relationship to the actual reality'
Tory councillor Jonathan Glanz, responsible
for housing in Westminster, said: 'We welcome these powers on residency because
there have been a lot of people who have come along with unrealistic
expectations about their ability to be housed in central London.
'We have almost insatiable demand in
Westminster from people arriving who say they would like to live here. We have
people living here we would like to favour, and hopefully this legislation will
allow us to do so.'
However Tory councillor Mike Jones, speaking
for the Local Government Association, criticised the housing proposals.
He said: ‘If they are in the country legally
we have a responsibility to do things that are right for people and that’s
housing.’
And the Bishop of Dudley, David Walker, said:
‘Public fears around immigration are like fears around crime. They bear little
relationship to the actual reality.’
Jonathan Portes, director of the National
Institute for Economic and Social Research, said immigrants were
"significantly less likely" to claim benefits than people born in the
UK - and that those coming from EU countries put more into the economy than
they took out.
He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that
arrivals were mostly younger people whereas the bulk of spending went on healthcare
and pensions for older people.
'All the evidence suggests that people who
come here from within the European Union make a substantial net contribution to
the public finances - they pay in far more than they take out,' he said.
He also played down the impact of health
tourism as a 'minuscule' part of a wider funding issue.
JEREMY HUNT VOWS TO
CLAMPDOWN ON COSTLY HEALTH TOURISM
The Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has vowed to
end 'health tourism'
Jeremy Hunt last night vowed to end the scandal
of ‘health tourism’, which is thought to cost the NHS hundreds of millions of
pounds a year.
The Health Secretary told the Daily Mail that
hospitals will be ordered to start charging foreign nationals for
treatment.
Critics claim the NHS is ‘wide open’ to
abuse, with doctors and hospitals making few checks on the eligibility of
patients who may have flown to Britain solely to get free healthcare.
Under the crackdown, visitors from outside
the EU could be required to take out health insurance or pay a bond before they
are granted a visa. Ministers are also investigating whether to extend charging
for foreign visitors to GP services.
It is part of a wider package of measures to
curb migrants’ free access to services being unveiled by the Prime Minister today.
Mr Hunt said: ‘The NHS is a National Health
Service, not a global health service, and we must stamp out abuse of the
system.’
Hospitals can already charge foreign visitors
for treatment. In theory they can also reclaim the cost of treating EU visitors
from their home governments.
But in many cases they do not, because it is
easier to claim the money from NHS funds. Ministers will consult on setting up
a central claims unit which would chase payments.
An estimate a decade ago said health tourism
could be costing more than £200million a year
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298561/British-taxpayers-owe-living-benefits-Cameron-warns-foreigners-real-fear-threat-jobs.html#ixzz2OadWMLTe
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
*Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298561/British-taxpayers-owe-living-benefits-Cameron-warns-foreigners-real-fear-threat-jobs.html#ixzz2OadWMLTe
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
A
mega mosque in a suburb that was 90 per cent white 30 years ago and the polite
apartheid dividing Britain
- David Goodhart argues that a new patriotism can unite our nation again
- We will have an ethnic minority population of around 25 per cent by
2020
- Goodhart says a confident and inclusive national identity can emerge
PUBLISHED: 17:52
EST, 24 March 2013 | UPDATED: 18:58 EST, 24 March 2013
On Saturday, the leading liberal commentator
David Goodhart described the profound effect mass immigration has had on social
cohesion. He admitted that, for decades, liberals like him failed to realise
its implications. Today, concluding his series, he sets out his vision of how a
new Britishness can bind the nation’s fractured communities.
Large-scale immigration has created an
England that is increasingly full of mysterious and unfamiliar worlds — as I
discovered one day sitting in an enormous minareted mosque in a sedate London
suburb among thousands of men in Pashtun dress listening to the words of an
elderly man.
Mirza Masroor Ahmad is not any old preacher. To
a couple of million Muslims of one particular sect, the Ahmadiyans, he is the
holiest man on the planet.
New landscape: Merton's mosque, which
dominates the skyline of the south London suburb, and can accommodate 10,000
people
The mosque in Merton, which dominates its
neighbourhood, replaced an Express Dairies bottling plant which provided a few
hundred jobs for local people and lots of milk bottles — an icon of an earlier,
more homogenised age.
The symbolism is not lost on the mainly white
older residents, who, when I was there researching the effects of mass
immigration on British society, did not seem to be embracing diversity with as
much enthusiasm as the proponents of multiculturalism think they should.
They are not unusual. Thanks to over-rapid
immigration in recent years, Britain is heading for an ethnic minority
population of around 25 per cent by the end of this decade.
And in Merton in South-West London, and too
many places like it, a polite apartheid reigns: an accommodation rather than an
integration. The white population has more or less reluctantly shuffled along
the bench and allowed others to sit down.
Since 1980, Merton’s minority population has
risen from 10 per cent to over 50 per cent today. Its primary schools — which
were still majority white as recently as 2003 — are now 64 per cent ethnic
minority. The area has become, in the jargon, ‘super diverse’.
More...
- New immigrants told: You must pay to see a GP, and
can't have a council home
- SATURDAY ESSAY: Why we on the Left made an epic mistake
on immigration
There is no dominant minority in Merton,
which helps to make the changes feel less threatening; but there is not much
evidence of a common life being built together either. London is not the
happily colour-blind multi-racial city that many people like to imagine.
You can see it in action at weekends in a
small park close to Morden station. On a sunny day, the place is usually full
but divided along ethnic lines: large groups of Pakistani women picnicking with
children, Polish guys drinking beer, young Indian men playing cricket, Africans
playing basketball.
Changing: Large-scale and rapid immigration
has had an effect on social cohesion, particularly in big British cities
There is quite a large East European group in
Merton which tends to keep itself to itself. Several of the more
entrepreneurial communities, such as the Indians and Tamils and
Iraqi Kurds, create jobs but they invariably go to members of their own
community.
Some minorities import historic feuds.
Orthodox Muslims in the area are suspicious of the Ahmadiyans; Tamil youths
fight among themselves, as do Somalis; and the historic black (Caribbean and
African) versus Asian antipathy is also played out on some streets.
YES, GIVE ASYLUM - BUT NOT
FOREVER
There is a strong case for tightening the
legal framework for asylum.
According to the UN Refugee Convention,
anyone is entitled to asylum if they are being persecuted on grounds of ‘race,
religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political
opinion’.
These are wide-ranging categories. As
Charles Clarke, former Labour Home Secretary, has observed: ‘They probably
cover hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people.’
But many of the largest groups, such as
Somalis, applying to enter Britain and other rich countries as refugees are not
facing individual persecution but rather are caught up in regional conflicts, civil
wars or natural disasters. They are not the people for whom the Convention was
designed.
However, in Britain in recent years, they
have often been granted exceptional leave to remain — or what is now called
‘humanitarian protection’.
Between 1997 and 2010, about 700,000
asylum seekers arrived in Britain. Less than a third were granted asylum or
leave to remain, but three-quarters are believed still to be in the country.
There continue to be serious difficulties in
removing this large backlog — because of legal constraints and the reluctance
of many countries to take them back.
There is no reason why the leave to remain
should be permanent (in theory, in Britain it is reviewed after five
years). Civil wars and natural disasters come to an end, and countries need
rebuilding.
Rich countries should try to provide shelter
from the storm for people badly affected — but then ensure that they return
when the storm is over.
Economically, many minority Mertonites are
doing pretty well in their enclaves. The Indians and Chinese are doing best of
all in school and in jobs, closely tracked by Koreans and Tamils. As in the
national picture, the white British are somewhere in the middle.
But not everyone is happy with this
situation, whatever the local politicians might claim. To many poorer and older
white people, there is a sense of loss.
‘We don’t like it, but we don’t have much
choice, do we?’ the owner of a hairdressing salon said about competition from a
Muslim hair-cutter who had set up shop two doors along.
Poorer working-class whites are doing worst
of all in Merton, as in many similar parts of the country. Such people have
mainly opted out: they seldom vote, and a lot of the younger people are ‘Neets’
— not in employment, education or training.
For many of the white people who have
remained as the area’s personality has changed, the disappearance of familiar
mental and physical landmarks has happened too fast — symbolised by that
giant Ahmadiya mosque with its capacity for 10,000 worshippers (plus six
smaller, mainstream mosques in the borough).
The Ahmadiyans are model immigrants in many
ways. They preach an ecumenical form of Islam and are grateful to be given
refuge in this country. They even took out posters on London buses
congratulating the Queen on her Diamond Jubilee.
But to many locals, that’s not the point. As
one man — described as White Heritage Elder Male in the jargon of race
relations — told a Merton council focus group: ‘We’ve lost this place to
other cultures. It’s not English any more.’
Local political leaders will often
privately admit to the same concern — though, as in all areas of high minority
settlement, they have no choice but to celebrate the new diversity.
And from their vantage point, things do often
look more integrated than they really are. For at the gatherings they
attend, there will usually be a cross-section of the local minority elites
mingling happily together and sharing the same interests and concerns.
(Some cynics note that the places where the
deepest common life is being forged between the new and the old tribes of urban
England is in the local political class and the drug gangs.)
But what we need to do now is to find a
surer way of binding our communities together. One essential tool, I believe,
is a national story that everyone can tap into: a story that can underpin
a sense of ‘emotional citizenship’; a belief that despite many different values
and backgrounds, we’re also part of the same team.
One of the failings of the separatist
multiculturism that developed in the Seventies and Eighties is that it
prevented the emergence of a new sense of Britishness — one that absorbed
newcomers while keeping a central place for the traditions of the existing
society.
Because no clear national identity was on
offer, when new citizens arrived here their own ethnic and religious identities
filled the gap, leading to charges that ‘They keep themselves to
themselves’ or ‘They don’t want to fit in’. Misunderstanding built
on misunderstanding, mistrust on mistrust.
Identity: David Goodhart argues that
accommodating people of different beliefs does not mean that we have to abandon
a sense of national unity
We now need a narrative to inspire and guide
us, a new British Dream that encompasses both old and new citizens into this
country of ours with its remarkable past.
For historical reasons to do with our
imperial past, some parts of the British elite are uncomfortable with the idea
of ‘nation’.
As a public schoolboy Leftie who was
then briefly attracted to Marxism while at university, I considered any
expression of attachment to my country as stupid (with the exception of the
England cricket and football teams).
Boundaries and borders were for the
small-minded and the provincial. They were just so uncool. I now believe this
disdain of mine was immature and premature, as well as loftily dismissive
of majority opinion.
And a nation state cannot just be a machine
for providing individuals with rights, wealth and passports. It needs emotional
ballast, too. We need to reinforce the idea of a ‘citizen nation’ that crosses
class and ethnic boundaries.
An unembarrassed and un- chauvinistic
attachment to this country — its language, its history, a sense of a common
home — has long been the sensible, low-key national feeling of ordinary
Britain.
Now, two generations after we stopped being an
Empire, the opportunity is here for a benign, confident identity to
emerge, which is an aid, not an obstacle, to integrating newcomers.
National feeling is not primarily about
institutions but is rooted in everyday life, from sprawling conurbations to
small villages; in shared experience and mutual interests; in a certain kind of
humour; and in a rich language.
Very few British people think you have to be
white to be part of this.
And most minority Britons, especially those
born here, do join the ‘we’, do know something about the history of this
country and connect to it, do speak the language as a native, and so on.
They may retain an attachment to other
traditions and memories, but there have always been many different, hybrid ways
to be English or British.
Immigration problems: British Prime Minister
David Cameron and Home Secretary Theresa May, right, visiting the UK Border
Agency staff in London
In accommodating people of different
backgrounds and beliefs, we do not need to abandon a sense of national history,
or our popular democratic ‘ownership’ of the country we live in. An inclusive
and strong national identity is possible.
To develop it, we need a few more stories
like the following one. The Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh told me recently of her
elderly Irish father sitting in the gallery of the House of Lords shaking his
head in pride and disbelief as he watched his other daughter, Margaret, being
elevated to the peerage.
He had come to England in the late Forties to
work as a labourer, met and married an Irish nurse and they had two daughters.
Both did well. One daughter became an MP, the
other became general-secretary of the Labour Party.
And as he watched one of his girls becoming a
baroness, he muttered under his breath: ‘Only in England … only in England.’
He was not technically correct — these things
happen in other places, too — but they happen here far more than we admit, and
it’s time that our national story reflected them.
This is not about deference, but gratitude
for the best features of an open society. After losing an Empire, perhaps
Britain has finally found a role: just being itself.
Adapted from The British Dream by David
Goodhart, to be published by Atlantic Books on April 1, 2013 at £20. © David
Goodhart. To order a copy for £14 (including p&p), call 0844 472 4157.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298553/A-mega-mosque-suburb-90-cent-white-30-years-ago-polite-apartheid-dividing-Britain.html#ixzz2OaZir3Zl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
*
NO
AMERICAN (Legal) BELIEVES THE UNEMPLOYMENT LEVEL IS BELOW 7%. IF YOU’RE AN
AMERICAN OVER 50, IT’S TWICE THAT. IF YOU’RE A BLACK AMERICAN IT IS THREE TIMES
THAT FIGURE.
AND
YET OBAMA CONTINUES TO ASSAULT THE AMERICAN WORKER TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO
OUR JOBS AND INTO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!
Fed projects high US unemployment into 2015
By
CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER
WASHINGTON
(AP) — The Federal Reserve foresees
unemployment remaining high into 2015, suggesting it will keep short-term
interest rates near record lows at least until then.
*
THE GREAT HISPANDERER KEEPS PROMISE TO DISMANTLE OUR BORDERS
TO EASE MORE OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS OVER THESE BORDERS and INTO
OUR JOBS AND VOTING BOOTHS!
*
WHO
IS OBAMA’S LATEST LA RAZA FASCIST FOR SECRETARY of LABOR?
*
THE REALITY OF OBAMA’S IN-SOURCING US
INTO A THIRD WORLD DUMPSTER THAT WILL KEEP HIS WALL STREET PAYMASTERS HAPPY AND
GENEROUS!
"Wage-cutting,
speedup and the imposition of sweat shop conditions are at the heart of Obama’s
strategy for doubling US exports by 2015. He has repeatedly boasted of his
administration’s success in “insourcing” jobs back to the US, omitting to
mention that these jobs often pay half their previous wages.
The
danger, as Washington Post economics columnist Robert Samuelson argues,
is that of “importing poverty” in the form of a new underclass—a permanent
group of working poor.
*
IN AMERICA, NOT LEGAL NEED APPLY!
Report details massive wealth
loss for youth in US
By Nick Barrickman
18 March 2013
18 March 2013
A recent report from Washington DC-based Urban Institute (UI)
shows that overall percentage of wealth in society for those in “Generation X
and Y” (those in their 20s and 30s) has been consistently dropping and is
currently at a level which may be unprecedented.
*
DURING BARACK OBAMA’S FIRST TERM,
2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.
IT’S ALL ABOUT MAKING
BILLIONAIRES BY KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED.
Silicon Valley Poverty Is Often
Ignored By The Tech Hub's Elite
*
AMERICANS
(LEGALS) HAND THEIR JOBS OVER TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS,
PAY FOR THE ANCHOR BABY BREEDING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE, AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE…
but have NO vote in amnesty?
BUT
THE DEMS ARE REALLY NOT CONCERNED ABOUT AMNESTY PASSING AS OBAMA WILL CONTINUE
NON-ENFORCEMENT UNTIL ILLEGALS ARE VOTING FOR THEIR OWN LA RAZA WELFARE STATE
like MEXIFORNIA!
AMERICANS SAY NO
TO AMNESTY!American Politicians Say FUCK YOU GRIBGO! WE NEED TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED!
Poll: 64% of Americans Oppose Citizenship for Illegals in Gang of 8 Immigration Plan
http://www.alipac.us/content.php?r=1567-Poll-64-of-Americans-Oppose-Citizenship-for-Illegals-in-Gang-of-8-Immigration-Plan
Obama's
'Hispanicazation' of America
*
Most Illegal Immigrant Families Collect Welfare… ALL
GET AMERICAN JOBS???
April 05, 2011
Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S.
families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on
behalf of their American-born anchor babies.
*
CRIMES
AGAINST AMERICA: Barack Obama, His Criminal Banksters and the Mexican Drug
Cartels
“I’m
not here to punish banks!” Barack Obama in the faces of the American People his
bankster donors looted – State of the Union Message
“Records show that four out of Obama's
top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman
Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup
($358,054).”
*
THE
MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA IS FUNDED BY BARACK OBAMA WITH AMERICAN TAX
DOLLARS AND OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER OBAMA APPOINTEE CECILIA MUNOZ
*
No comments:
Post a Comment