BARACK OBAMA
– JP MORGAN’S RENT BOY? OR SIMPLY A SERVANT OF WALL STREET’S BIGGEST CRIMINAL
BANKSTERS, ALL OF WHICH END UP WORKING IN THE CORRUPT OBAMA WHITE HOUSE!
PROBABLY THE ONLY TRUTH OBAMA
EVER TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WAS THAT HE WAS “NOT HERE TO PUNISH BANKS!”…
NOPE, AND HE NEVER HAS. THEIR CRIMES, LOOTING AND PROFITS HAVE SOARED UNDER
OBAMA.
YOU WOULD NOT HAVE FOUND
OBAMA’S DOJ GOING AFTER OBAMA’S PALS AT JP MORGAN. HOLDER IS TOO BUSY
HISPANDERING FOR LA RAZA, SUING AMERICAN STATES AND SABOTAGING OUR LAWS AND
BORDERS SO THE OBAMANATION CAN BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.
“Records show
that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial
industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase
($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”
OBAMA’S OLD PALS J.P.MORGAN STILL mUCKING OVER CONSUMERS… IT’S LIKE OLD
TIMES FOR THE BANKSTERS!
Headline:
California lawsuit alleges illegal collection practices by JPMorgan Chase FUCKING OVER AMERICAN STUDENTS
THE
LONG HISTORY of BARACK OBAMA and HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS JP MORGAN… STILL
LOOTING AMERICA AND THE WORLD!
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
This is the unadulterated voice of finance capital
speaking. It should be recalled that JPMorgan is deeply implicated in the
speculative operations that have devastated the lives of hundreds of millions
of workers around the world. In March of this year, a US Senate committee
released a 300-page report documenting the criminal practices and fraud carried
out by JPMorgan, the largest bank in the US and the world’s biggest dealer in
derivatives. Despite the detailed revelations in the report, no action will be
taken against the bank’s CEO, Jamie who enjoys the personal confidence of the
US president.
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcas
DID OBAMA PUNK
US OR IS HE SIMPLY A FAILED PRESIDENCY?
OBAMA, THE MAN THAT NEVER VOTED DURING THE BRIEF PERIOD HE
WAS IN THE SENATE, OWNED AND OPERATED BY BIG BANKSTERS, IS NOTHING BUT A CON
JOB CALLED “CHANGE”… OR DICTATOR IN THE MAKING.
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
EITHER WAY HE IS THE MOST FAILED PRESIDENCY IN MODERN
AMERICAN HISTORY.
BANK
PROFITS
YES, UNDER THE BANKSTER-OWNED PRESIDENT OBAMA, LIFE IS GOOD
FOR HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS. THEIR PROFITS and CRIMES ARE SOARING AND SO
ARE FORECLOSURES.
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
“Records show
that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial
industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase
($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”
A CASE OF INCEST! OBAMA PARTNERS WITH WALL STREET’S BIGGEST
CRIMINAL BANKSTERS, MOST OF WHOM NOW WORK IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION!
CRONY CAPITALISM: OBAMA PROTECTS JP MORGAN, THE BIGGEST
BANKSTER CRIMINALS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, AND ONE OF OBAMA’S BIGGEST BANKSTER
DONORS!
Nearly five years after the greatest financial crash since
the Great Depression, triggered by rampant illegality and fraud on the part of
the major banks, not a single major institution or leading bank executive has
been indicted, let alone tried, convicted and jailed.
The criminal charges are part of an attempt by the Obama
administration to create the appearance that it is cracking down on Wall Street
criminality, while it continues to shield top executives and allow banking
fraud and criminality to continue unabated.
“Records show
that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial
industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase
($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”
CRONY CAPITALISM: JP MORGAN’S RENT BOY, BARACK OBAMA HAS HELPED HIS
CRIMINAL BANKSTERS LOOT AMERICA BIG TIME!
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
…it’s probably all he’s ever done well in in his pathetic corrupt
political life!
…no
filthy politician in American history has taken more loot from looting
banksters than the WALKING CON JOB BARACK OBAMA… and not one bankster has gone
to prison! HOW’D THAT
HAPPEN?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?$?
“Records
show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial
industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase
($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”
Report details massive
wealth loss for youth in US
By Nick Barrickman
18 March 2013
18 March 2013
A recent report from Washington DC-based Urban Institute (UI)
shows that overall percentage of wealth in society for those in “Generation X and
Y” (those in their 20s and 30s) has been consistently dropping and is currently
at a level which may be unprecedented.
*
THE AMNESTY ASSAULT on
AMERICA’S YOUTH – It’s all about keeping wages depressed!
Here
are some key facts presented by the CBO: 1) There are now 40 million
foreign-born people living in the United States, making immigrants a bigger
share of our national population than at any time since 1920. 2) Twenty-two
million — a majority of the foreign born — are non-citizens. 3)
Eleven-and-a-half million — a majority of the non-citizens — are illegal aliens.
Amnesty's Message: Send Us Your
High School Dropouts
*
DURING BARACK OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, 2/3s OF ALL
JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.
IT’S ALL ABOUT MAKING BILLIONAIRES BY KEEPING
WAGES DEPRESSED.
SHOULD WE KEEP IMPORTING FOREIGN BORN TECH
WORKERS YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR?
“Tech tycoons like Larry Ellison and
Mark Zuckerberg have gotten rich while wages in the technology sector have
stagnated.”
Silicon Valley Poverty Is Often Ignored By The Tech Hub's Elite
Silicon Valley Poverty Is Often Ignored By The Tech Hub's Elite
TECH
GIANT APPLE COMPUTER SAYS HELL NO TO PAYING TAXES and HELL NO TO HIRING AMERIANS!
KEEP THE BOATLOADS OF CHINESE AND INDIANS COMING!
Tech firms fight hiring rules in
immigration bill
Americans would "be shocked to know that most
of the H-1B visas … are going to outsourcing companies," Sen. Dick Durbin,
D-Ill., said during a recent hearing.
Story Highlights
- Bill provision that would require firms
to post jobs for Americans is targeted
- Technology firms have spent millions
on lobbying on immigration
- Judiciary Committee set to start
working on bill
The measure, part of a sweeping compromise bill drafted by a bipartisan group of eight senators, would require job openings to be posted on a new government website for 30 days and order companies to first extend job offers to "equally or better qualified" U.S. workers. It would give the U.S. Labor Department the power to review and challenge those hiring decisions.
Proponents say the measures are needed to curb abuses by companies who they say use the visa program to hire cheaper labor. Technology companies say the proposed rules would cripple their ability to hire the best employees from a global workforce and represent inappropriate government intrusion in internal hiring decisions.
The fight over hiring practices is part of the massive lobbying campaign underway on the immigration measure and will offer a fresh test of the technology industry's growing influence in Washington. The companies involved in the computer and Internet sectors spent nearly $140 million in lobbying last year -- more than twice the $69 million the industry poured into influencing Washington a decade earlier, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political spending.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to begin work on the bill Thursday.
The hiring battle centers on the program that grants H-1B visas, which go mostly to college-educated foreigners in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields. Technology companies say they face a chronic shortage of qualified workers in these fields. The United States sets an annual limit of 85,000 visas for these companies, and the competition for them is intense: This year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services opened up the application process April 1, and the cap was reached within a week.
Industry groups have made big gains in the Senate's immigration proposal. The bill, for instance, Would increase the H-1B cap to 205,000 annually. However, tech officials warn the new recruiting requirements could drive companies to move their skilled jobs overseas, rather than comply. A commonly cited example: Microsoft's decision to open a software center in Vancouver, British Columbia, after Congress failed to pass immigration legislation in 2007 that would have significantly increased the number of H-1B visas.
Under the bill, "employers are going to have an arbitrary government standard imposed on every hiring decision," said Robert Hoffman, the top lobbyist for the Information Technology Industry Council, a trade group. The proposed rule, he said, ignores subjective factors that influence hiring. "A perfect example: How does one define whether or not someone has the personality to fit into a corporate culture?" he said.
"We are not trying to change any of the fundamental policy goals that they are trying to achieve" in the Senate, Hoffman said. "We are just trying to tweak it, so that these goals and other goals, like retaining the best and brightest and growing in the United States, so that those types of goals are advanced as well."
Ron Hira, an associate professor of public policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology, has criticized the visa program, saying it allows firms to hire "cheap indentured labor."
"The technology industry is asking the government to come in and intervene in the normal functioning of the U.S. labor market, specifically on their behalf," Hira said.
Bruce Morrison, a former Connecticut congressman who lobbies on behalf of a group that represents American engineers, said the organization will object to any effort to "dilute worker protections" as the measure moves through the Senate. "The arguments from the companies is that there aren't any Americans to take these jobs," he said, "so there shouldn't be any problem."
The biggest users of H-1B visas are not brand-name companies, but little-known staffing companies that provide foreign workers on a temporary basis to U.S. companies — including banks, health insurance companies and big retailers. Cognizant, a New Jersey-based company that employs 27,000 people in the USA, is the top user of the temporary visas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records show. Most of its workers come from India.
In addition, three India-based outsourcing companies rank among the top five recipients of H-1Bs, according to the federal data.
Americans would "be shocked to know that most of the H-1B visas … are going to outsourcing companies," Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., one of eight senators who drafted the immigration bill, said during a recent hearing. "They're going to these firms, largely in India, who are finding workers, engineers, who will work at low wages in the U.S."
Durbin is a driving force behind the hiring requirements in the Senate proposal.
The measure would make business harder for staffing companies dependent on foreign workers. It would impose higher fees on firms that rely on overseas employees for more than 30% of their workforce. Starting in 2016, the bill would bar granting any new temporary visas for foreign workers at companies with more than half their workers on the visas. Both measures apply to companies that employ more than 50 people.
Cognizant spokesman John Procter said he did not have a breakdown on the percentage of the company's workers in the USA on H-1B visas. He said the bill imposes an "arbitrary, detrimental restriction on the number of skilled immigrants."
"It would really change the way America does business," he said. "The company is very focused on educating legislators and making sure this language doesn't make its way into any final outcome."
Cognizant hired its first federal lobbyist in 2010 andby last year, it had spent nearly $1 million on federal lobbying, congressional records show. Its team includes Democratic power broker Heather Podesta, who did not return a telephone call. Other companies also have stepped up their political activity.
Last month, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, Netflix's Reed Hastings, Google's Eric Schmidt and other technology executives teamed up to underwrite an advocacy group to promote their views on immigration. Two of its subsidiaries began a seven-figure advertising campaign to shore up voter support for key senators in the immigration debate.
The tech industry "has clearly come of age," said Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation. "In the last decade, we've seen this tremendous recognition from Silicon Valley of the need to play in the power circles — to both protect their bottom line and to alter the political scene to their advantage."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/05/06/tech-firms-lobbying-against-labor-immigration-measure/2137837/
"Barack Obama's kind of change is where you sit down
and you cut a deal with the corporate world," Edwards Campaign Manager
David Bonior said during an interview with MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough. "If
you look at his record in Illinois when he had a major — sponsored a major
health bill that's what he did. He watered down with the help of the corporate
lobbyist and they got a weak product out of that."
Scarborough asked: "Are you saying that Barack Obama is
a sellout to corporate interests?"
Bonior replied: "He was four years ago in Illinois. All
you have to do is look at the legislation I'm referring to."
Bonior was referring to health care legislation that Obama
was instrumental in passing when he was an Illinois state senator five years
ago, in part because he worked with insurance companies to make additions to
the bill that would ensure their approval of the measure.
*
All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest - from drug companies to auto unions to doctors - in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.
All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest - from drug companies to auto unions to doctors - in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.
DENVERPOST.com
opinion
Krauthammer:
The decline of Obama
By Charles
Krauthammer
What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down further than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post-Nixon pardon)?
All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals
with every manner of special interest - from drug companies to auto unions to
doctors - in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.
The
conventional wisdom is that Obama made a tactical mistake by
farming
out his agenda to Congress and allowing himself to be pulled left by the
doctrinaire liberals of the Democratic congressional leadership.
ALL
THREE, OBAMA, REID AND PELOSI MAKE JUDICIAL WATCH’S 10 MOST CORRUPT EVERY YEAR!
But
the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous.
Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chavista ex-terrorist William
Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter Jeremiah Wright?
But
forget the character witnesses. Just look at Obama's behavior as president,
beginning with his first address to Congress.
Unbidden,
unforced and unpushed by the congressional leadership, Obama gave his most
deeply felt vision of America, delivering the boldest social democratic
manifesto ever issued by a U.S. president. In American politics, you can't get
more left than that speech and still be on the playing field.
In a
center-right country, that was problem enough. Obama then compounded it by
vastly misreading his mandate. He assumed it was personal.
This,
after winning by a mere seven points in a year of true economic catastrophe, of
an extraordinarily unpopular Republican incumbent, and of a politically weak
and unsteady opponent.
Nonetheless,
Obama imagined that, as Fouad Ajami so brilliantly observed, he had won the
kind of banana-republic plebiscite that grants caudillo-like authority to
remake everything in one's own image.
Accordingly,
Obama unveiled his plans for a grand makeover of the American system, animating
that vision by enacting measure after measure that greatly enlarged state
power, government spending and national debt.
Not
surprisingly, these measures engendered powerful popular skepticism that burst
into tea-party town-hall resistance.
Obama's
reaction to that resistance made things worse. Obama fancies himself tribune of
the people, spokesman for the grass roots, harbinger of a new kind of politics
from below that would upset the established lobbyist special-interest order of
Washington.
Yet
faced with protests from a real grass-roots movement, his party and his
supporters called it a mob - misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged,
bordering on racist.
All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals
with every manner of special interest - from drug companies to auto unions to
doctors - in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.
"Get
out of the way" and "don't do a lot of talking," the great
bipartisan scolded opponents whom he blamed for creating the "mess"
from which he is merely trying to save us.
If
only they could see. So with boundless confidence in his own persuasiveness,
Obama undertook a summer campaign to enlighten the masses by addressing
substantive objections to his reforms.
Things
got worse still. With answers so slippery and implausible and, well, fishy, he
began jeopardizing the most fundamental asset of any new president - trust.
You
can't say that the system is totally broken and in need of radical
reconstruction, but nothing will change for you; that Medicare is bankrupting
the country, but $500 billion in cuts will have no effect on care; that you
will expand coverage while reducing deficits - and not inspire incredulity and
mistrust. When ordinary citizens understand they are being played for fools,
they bristle.
After
a disastrous summer - mistaking his mandate, believing his press, centralizing
power, governing left, disdaining citizens for (of all things) organizing -
Obama is in trouble.
Let's
be clear: This is a fall, not a collapse. He's not been repudiated or even
defeated. He will likely regroup and pass some version of health insurance
reform that will restore some of his clout and popularity.
But
what has occurred - irreversibly - is this: He's become ordinary. The spell is
broken. The charismatic conjurer of 2008 has shed his magic. He's regressed to
the mean, tellingly expressed in poll numbers hovering at 50 percent.
For a
man who only recently bred a cult, ordinariness is a great burden, and for his
acolytes, a crushing disappointment. Obama has become a politician like others.
And
like other flailing presidents, he will try to salvage a cherished reform - and
his own standing - with yet another prime-time speech.
But
for the first time since election night in Grant Park, he will appear in the
most unfamiliar of guises - mere mortal, a treacherous transformation to which
a man of Obama's supreme self-regard may never adapt.
No comments:
Post a Comment