THOUSANDS of
AMERICANS (Legals) LAID OFF… as Dems put millions of Mexicans in our jobs!
"They hauled them down to the
border," Sakuma said. "Three days later, they were standing in our
office, but they had a different name and a different Social Security
number."
THIS COUNTRY NOW HAS A MASSIVE
WELFARE STATE JUST TO PAY FOR MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. THE ANCHORS EXPAND
WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS AND ANCHOR AND EXPAND MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA.
NEXT TO DRUGS AND CRIMINALS,
MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORT IS ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.
MEX-INFESTED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR
BABY BREEDERS!
Jeb Bush: U.S. Economy Needs
‘More Fertile’ Immigrants
Catherine Thompson 10:51 AM EDT, Friday June 14, 2013
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R), a longtime immigration reform advocate,
said Friday that because immigrants are "more fertile" they are a
crucial source of labor for the United States.
"Immigrants create far more businesses than native-born Americans,”
Bush said at a Faith and Freedom Coalition conference, as quoted by the Washington Post. “Immigrants are
more fertile, and they love families, and they have more intact families, and
they bring a younger population. Immigrants create an engine of economic
prosperity.”
Bush was criticized for seemingly
flip-flopping on support for a path to citizenship after he co-authored a book,
“Immigration Wars: Forging An American Solution,” but ultimately supported
immigration reform legislation being hammered out in Congress.
*
IN
MEXIFORNIA IT IS A DIFFERENT STORY. MEX CONSULATES OPERATE TO HELP LA RAZA LOOT
THE STUPID GRINGOS!
OBAMA
and MEXICO LOOT PRIVATE ENTERPRISE HOSPITALS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR “FREE”
HEALTHCARE FOR LA RAZA MEXICANS… What’s left for Americans (Legals)???
NO ENFORCEMENT PROMISED TO BORDER JUMPERS AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS:
“I’m afraid we’ll have a
deal like in 1986 where the amnesty provisions become law and the enforcement
doesn’t occur,” Sessions said Wednesday on the Senate floor. “We don’t have the
kind of commitment to law enforcement at this point that gives the American
people the confidence that we’re moving on the right path. So this is no sure
thing.”
A CASE OF ONE ANCHOR
BABY BREEDING MEXICAN FAMILY
THEY DO SO ON BEHALF
OF THEIR GREEDY BIG AG BIZ DONORS!
Jose Herria emigrated illegally from Mexico to Stockton, Calif., in 1997 to work as a fruit picker. He brought with him his wife, Felipa, and three children, 19, 12 and 8 -- all illegals. When Felipa gave birth to her fourth child, daughter Flor, the family had what is referred to as an "anchor baby" -- an American citizen by birth who provided the entire Silverio clan a ticket to remain in the U.S. permanently.
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer
funds for services to non-citizens --- was the last gasp of white America in
California." --- Art
Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA RAZA
SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack Obama and LA RAZA.
A
week later, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said the immigration bill was “far worse”
than ObamaCare: He described the bill as an attempt by Senate Democrats “to
establish another monolithic voting bloc” among Hispanic Americans.
Jeb Bush generated
quite a bit of publicity for his new book yesterday by suggesting that
amnestied illegal immigrants should not be eligible for citizenship. Instead, he’s suggesting they be given some kind of
permanent status that would provide them work cards, Social Security numbers,
driver’s licenses, and the right to travel abroad and return, but not allow for
eventual naturalization — in effect, a kind of permanent guestworker program or
a green-card-lite, rather than an actual green card. This is consistent with
suggestions from other pro-amnesty Republicans, including Senator Rubio
and a group of House members working up an amnesty deal.
Jeb
Bush, as you would imagine, has long been in favor of citizenship for illegal
aliens. This “evolution” in his thinking is a
tactic to offer a “compromise” version of amnesty that is somehow less
distasteful to Republican lawmakers, as a way of duping them into voting for
it, or giving them cover to dupe their constituents into thinking it’s not really
an amnesty. And it’s being offered as an option opposed by the Left, and
the Left is playing its role, calling the move a “blunder of huge
proportions” and the like.
THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
IS FUNDED BY BARACK OBAMA WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS AND OPERATES OUT OF THE
WHITE HOUSE UNDER OBAMA APPOINTEE CECILIA MUNOZ
ANOTHER BUSH CAPITULATES TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY – NEXT MOVE IS TO
HISPANDER LIKE AN OBAMAnation AND PROMISE MUCHO GRINGO-PAID LA RAZA WELFARE,
“FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING=18 YEARS of WELFARE, AND A GRINGO JOB FOR EVERY
ILLEGAL THAT VOTES!
Jeb Bush:
I'm 'in Sync' With Lindsey Graham on Immigration Reform
By George
Stephanopoulos | ABC OTUS News – 2 hrs 22 mins ago
During
an interview for "This Week," former Florida
governor Jeb Bush told me that he was "in sync" with South
Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on the issue of immigration reform.
Graham,
a key member of the bipartisan group of senators pushing for immigration
reform, took Bush to task after the former Florida
governor said Monday that he did not support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, which is a key component of
the plan being pushed by the Senate group. Bush
subsequently reversed course and said he could in fact support a plan that
included a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants already living in the
United States.
"Senator
Graham and I talked. He was responding to concerns that were expressed before
the book was actually published," Bush said. "I told him that I
support his efforts and I applaud what he's doing. And he concluded, after he
heard what the thesis of the book is that we're in sync. We're on the same - on
the same path."
"The
basic premise needs to be that coming to the country legally should be easier
with less cost than coming to the country illegally. And if you can create a
system like that as is being discussed in the Senate and in the House- through
a path to citizenship, that's fine," Bush said. "But my guess is that
will take a long, long time to achieve. In the interim, it's important to take
people out from the shadows to allow them to have- the dignity of being- having
legal status."
Florida
governor Jeb Bush told me that he was "very encouraged" about the
possibility of comprehensive immigration reform - a legislative achievement
that has eluded lawmakers for more than a decade - becoming law by the end of
the year.
"I'm
very encouraged. There are some big sticking points about how do you deal with
making sure that there's enough seasonal workers, temporary worker programs
that have been quite successful in the past," Bush said. "There's a
lot of work being done, really good work, courageous work, 'cause this is
complex and may not be popular, but I think it's- it is possible that comprehensive
reform can be done."
Turning
to President Obama's new effort to reach out to his colleagues on right - which
included inviting the GOP's 2012 vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan to lunch
- Bush complimented the president, comparing his actions to those of Ronald Reagan, an icon of the Republican Party.
"I'm
very encouraged by the fact the president is trying to restore some personal
connection with policymakers in Congress. I'm at the Reagan Library today and
that's kind of what Ronald Reagan did. He didn't scorn his adversaries, he
embraced them and got a lot done," Bush said. "This is very positive
in my mind. It makes it harder to reach agreement when there's not trust. It's
just human nature. And so this is maybe a good, positive first step."
Bush
qualified his praise for the president, tweaking him for a lack of
"seriousness" when it came to the president's efforts to reach a deal
to reduce the national debt and specifically his willingness to embrace
entitlement reform as part of a potential bargain with Republicans.
"I
haven't seen the seriousness of the president's efforts. I'd love to see a
specific plan that really did reform- bend the cost curve for Medicare and the
entitlement system. I haven't seen it, so if there is through these talks, some
kind of consensus that emerged, I don't think you should say, 'no, no, no'
about anything'" Bush said.
"Frankly,
there was already been one of the largest tax increases in American history a
month ago. And frankly, we ought to be focused on sustained economic growth,
which grows more revenue for people and for government than any tax increase
that's been suggested, so there are a lot of things that could be done to
create a real grand bargain. And let the process work. I'm hopeful that the
president's sincere about this," Bush said.
Bush
also insisted during out conversation that he is not positioning himself for a
2016 presidential run as he promotes his new book "Immigration Wars,"
even as speculation grows that he aims to be the third member of the Bush
family to occupy the oval office.
"I'm
not viewing this as a political reentry either. I just don't view it that
way," Bush said. "Everything's viewed with a political lens in
Washington and that's just the nature of the beast and it is what it is."
*
Jeb Bush generated
quite a bit of publicity for his new book yesterday by suggesting that
amnestied illegal immigrants should not be eligible for citizenship. Instead, he’s suggesting they be given some kind of
permanent status that would provide them work cards, Social Security numbers,
driver’s licenses, and the right to travel abroad and return, but not allow for
eventual naturalization — in effect, a kind of permanent guestworker program or
a green-card-lite, rather than an actual green card. This is consistent with
suggestions from other pro-amnesty Republicans, including Senator Rubio
and a group of House members working up an amnesty deal.
Unfortunately, it’s a trick.
Jeb
Bush, as you would imagine, has long been in favor of citizenship for illegal
aliens. This “evolution” in his thinking is a
tactic to offer a “compromise” version of amnesty that is somehow less
distasteful to Republican lawmakers, as a way of duping them into voting for
it, or giving them cover to dupe their constituents into thinking it’s not really
an amnesty. And it’s being offered as an option opposed by the Left, and
the Left is playing its role, calling the move a “blunder of huge
proportions” and the like.
This enables the organ of the pro-amnesty
movement to label it “a middle-ground option” when it is nothing of the kind. (That was also the
point of last month’s “leaking” of
Obama’s immigration bill.) Once the illegal population is legalized, the game
is over — the amnesty will obviously never be revoked, and the Democrats will
then launch a campaign against Republicans accusing them (correctly) of
imposing on helpless Latinos a Jim Crow–style system of second-class status,
something more appropriate to Saudi Arabia. If they go this way, the GOP
candidate in 2016 will look back fondly on Romney’s 27 percent of the Hispanic
vote — and he’ll have sabotaged his own base as well, resulting in an even
further drop in blue-collar white turnout and Republican share.When I say this whole debate over a “compromise” form of amnesty is kabuki, scripted out months ago by the open-borders crowd, I don’t mean that metaphorically. The pre-planned nature of this struck me at the House Judiciary Committee hearing a few weeks ago. San Antonio mayor Julian Castro (whose part-time job consists solely of chairing city-council meetings, by the way) insisted under questioning that a path to citizenship is the only option that Congress should consider, and was itself a “compromise” between open borders and mass deportation.
But then, his handler, Angela Kelley, head of immigration matters at the Center for American Progress and a key White House proxy on the issue, leaned forward and whispered in Castro’s ear. After that, he changed his tune slightly, saying a path to citizenship was the best outcome but that a lesser status might be acceptable. It wouldn’t surprise me me if Angela Kelley and White House immigration coordinator Cecilia Muñoz have actually done conference calls with staff for Rubio and Bush gaming out this strategy.
The question before us is not how illegal immigrants should be legalized, but whether they should be amnestied at all. And until we have a real enforcement infrastructure in place, the answer has to be “no.”
*
IN REALITY MEXICANS LOATHE THIS NATION AND HAVE NO DESIRE TO
BECOME AMERICANS. THEY SIMPLY JUMP OUR BORDERS TO LOOT. HERE’S WHAT LA RAZA
WANTS FIRST:
“ Under his proposal, illegal immigrants would receive amnesty
in the sense of permanent status — work cards, Social Security numbers,
driver’s licenses, and so forth — but not a path to citizenship”
Jeb Bush and amnesty lite
Jeb Bush has come up with a compromise approach to
immigration reform. Under his proposal, illegal immigrants would receive amnesty
in the sense of permanent status — work cards, Social Security numbers,
driver’s licenses, and so forth — but not a path to citizenship. Citizenship
would only be available if they left the U.S. and applied from their home
country, a course of action few would be likely to take.
Bush would also try to secure the border.
However, as I understand it, a certification of “success” in this endeavor
would not be a prerequisite for the amnesty.
In theory, amnesty but no path to citizenship
is a sensible compromise. We aren’t going to deport many illegal aliens under
any regime; nor do I believe that mass deportation would, on balance, be a
desirable policy. For me, the deal breaker on immigration reform is not amnesty
per se, but rather rewarding illegal aliens with United States citizenship.
But Mark
Krikorian argues that Bush’s compromise is a ruse that
will pave the way for an eventual grant of citizenship:
Once the illegal population
is legalized, the game is over — the amnesty will obviously never be revoked,
and the Democrats will then launch a campaign against Republicans accusing them
(correctly) of imposing on helpless Latinos a Jim Crow–style system of
second-class status, something more appropriate to Saudi Arabia. If they go
this way, the GOP candidate in 2016 will look back fondly on Romney’s 27
percent of the Hispanic vote — and he’ll have sabotaged his own base as well,
resulting in an even further drop in blue-collar white turnout and Republican
share.
I agree that Bush probably is trying to pull a
fast one. He has long backed a path to citizenship for illegal aliens. So why
the change, just as momentum is building for such a path? Bush supplied part of the answer when he
told Charlie Rose that he wrote the book last year (i.e., before the momentum
began to build). However, Bush continues to offer his compromise because, I
suspect, he has an eye on the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. Most
likely, his true preference remains a path to citizenship for illegals, but he
understands that this is a unacceptable to most Republicans.
On the merits, Krikorian is also correct that
it would be quite difficult to hold the line at “amnesty lite.” But it is
already proving difficult to resist legislation that would provide illegal
immigrants with a path to citizenship.
Depending on the exact lay of the legislative
land, it might make sense to accept a compromise that, for now, denies the path
to citizenship. Who knows? Republicans may one day behave like a serious
political party — one that rewards the people who vote for it, not those who
vote against it — rather than like masochists.
As for Bush’s proposal to proceed with amnesty
before the border is certified as secure, it doesn’t bother me that much. The
certification process will likely be a sham, in all events. And to the extent
that there’s any progress in border security in the run-up to certification,
that progress will always be subject to reversal.
Finally, as I understand it, the illegal
immigrants to whom Bush would deny a path to citizenship are those who entered
the U.S. illegally as adults and who choose to remain in the U.S. rather than
return to their native countries to go through the lawful immigration process.
Those who accompanied them as children would have path to citizenship. This
represents a huge reward — on top of amnesty — for the adults who entered
illegally. In my view, it is problematic.
*
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
*
Immigrating America Into a Colony of Mexico
We’ve got an even more
ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the
reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of
Mexico. With 9.2 million Mexicans now living in America, their goal of colonizing
our country back into Mexico moves forward. A more sobering reality stems from
the evidence that it’s Mexican-American citizens in the forefront of this
disintegration of our country.
Americans (Legals) have become a
passive society while Mexico loots and occupies.
Here’s what the Democrat Party and
Mexico have done to CA.
CALIFORNIA: MEXICO’S LOOTED WELFARE
STATE
*
Importing Poverty:
Immigration and Poverty in the United States: A Book of Charts
By Robert Rector
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.
*
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
OBAMA’S
AMNESTY HOAX TO LEGALIZE MEXICO’S LOOTING, DESTROY THE GOP WITH 40 MILLION NEW
DEMS, AND KEEP WAGES FOR GREATER PROFITS FOR THE PAYMASTERS OF CORRUPT DEMS’
HERITAGE FOUNDATION: OBAMA’S AMNESTY
WOULD ADD 100 MORE ILLEGALS AND COST AMERICANS (Legals) BILLIONS AND BILLIONS
the staggering cost of Mexico’s
looting:
No comments:
Post a Comment