EVERY CORRUPT and SELF-SERVING POLITICIAN OUT THERE KNOWS SHE CAN LIE TO THE STUPID GRINGOS ONLY SO LONG ON THE TOPIC OF "HOPE & CHANGE" BEFORE NO ONE (LEGALS) WILL VOTE FOR THEM. AT THAT POINT THE HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS' VOTES KICKS IN.
ONLY OBAMA HISPANDERS MORE THAN HILLARY!
ONLY OBAMA HISPANDERS MORE THAN HILLARY!
MEXICO and OBAMA’S CONSPIRACY to destroy America’s
borders to build the LA RAZA WELFARE STATE in AMERICA
and keep wages depressed with endless hordes of heavy breeding
Mexicans pouring over our borders.
ONLY BARACK OBAMA HAS TAKEN MORE BRIBES FROM THE BANKSTERS
THAN HILLARY!
“Mrs. Clinton was the industry’s home state senator, and
the financial sector was the second-largest giver to her presidential campaign
in 2008. In her post-State Department life, she has been showered with lucrative speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, J. P.
Morgan and other financial firms. In her talks, she says it is unproductive to
vilify the industry, and she avoids the kind of language that puts off
financial executives, as when President Obama referred to “fat cat” bankers in
2009.”
Wall Street
Offers Clinton a Thorny Embrace
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and AMY CHOZICKJULY 7, 2014
As its relationship with Democrats hits a historic low, Wall Street sees a
solution on the horizon: Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Mrs. Clinton was the industry’s home state senator, and the financial sector
was the second-largest giver to her presidential campaign in 2008. In her
post-State Department life, she has been showered with lucrative speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, J. P.
Morgan and other financial firms. In her talks, she says it is unproductive to
vilify the industry, and she avoids the kind of language that puts off
financial executives, as when President Obama referred to “fat cat” bankers in
2009.
But as Wall Street hopes for a warm embrace from the former secretary of
state, Mrs. Clinton must grapple with a populist surge coursing through
politics, on both the right and the left.
Attacks on Wall Street bailouts are a staple of Tea Party campaigns.
Republicans, many of whom deliberately stood on the sidelines during the
legislative battle over the Dodd-Frank legislation and have quietly reaped the
benefits of Wall Street’s disenchantment with Mr. Obama, are now reeling from
the primary election defeat of Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the
former majority leader. Mr. Cantor’s opponent, David Brat, won in part by attacking Mr. Cantor’s ties to the financial world.
Mrs. Clinton, as the
home state senator to Wall Street, made a visit to the New York Stock Exchange
on Aug. 3, 2004. Credit Richard Drew/Associated Press
In Mrs. Clinton’s years away from politics, income inequality has become a
defining political issue in the Democratic Party, elevating a
new generation of stars like Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who has
pushed for the breakup of large financial institutions.
Late last month, Ms. Warren campaigned in Kentucky for Alison Lundergan
Grimes, the Democratic candidate for Senate, a sign that some in the party
believe the Massachusetts senator’s message resonates well beyond the left.
(Mrs. Clinton has not yet campaigned on behalf of Ms. Grimes, though an adviser
said she will likely do so this fall.)
“I think there’s a potential window for Democrats to come back, but if it
is one wing of the party pushing the populist line — anti-big banks, punishing
people whether or not they had anything to do with the crisis — they’ll lock
this crowd into a Republican alternative,” said Bill Daley, a former chief of
staff to Mr. Obama and commerce secretary under President Bill Clinton who is
now a hedge fund executive.
During her 2008 primary campaign against Mr. Obama, Mrs. Clinton emphasized
her husband’s economic record. But running on the 1990s will not work in 2016,
Mr. Daley suggested. “She has to figure out where she is going forward,” Mr.
Daley said.
At stake is not merely tens of millions of dollars in campaign money, but
the shape of debates about social mobility, taxation and regulation. In the
next few years, lawmakers may consider proposals to allow American corporations
to “repatriate” overseas income at a reduced tax rate; change how the
government backs home mortgages; eliminate the “carried interest” loophole that
allows private equity managers to avoid paying higher tax rates; and more
tightly regulate commodities trading.
“Secretary Clinton’s time in the Senate was characterized by a willingness
to work with all of the stakeholders, but she left the Senate just as the
crisis was hitting its low point,” said Francis Creighton, the top lobbyist for
the Financial Services Roundtable, a trade association representing the largest
banks and financial firms. “As an industry, we’re not sure how her views have
evolved over the last five years on what we do. The question is: Will her
perspective have changed?”
The last time Mrs. Clinton waded deeply into these issues, she was locked
in a heated primary and the country was on the verge of the worst economic
crisis since the Great
Depression. She was early to call for tougher regulation of financial
derivatives and private-equity markets, and in a 2007 speech called for major
federal intervention in the market for subprime loans, arguing that “we need to
acknowledge that Wall Street has played a significant role in our current
problems, and in particular the housing crisis.”
Several people who advised Mrs. Clinton on her 2008 presidential campaign
said the speech angered some of her Wall Street donors, who complained about
what they viewed as her increasing antagonism to the industry. Mrs. Clinton has
also called for eliminating the carried interest tax loophole.
“If you look at her positions, in my view, she was very aggressive on
ensuring that Wall Street was better regulated and her argument about all these
proposals is that this is going to be better for all of us,” said Neera Tanden,
who was Mrs. Clinton’s policy director during the 2008 campaign.
A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, declined to describe her
positions on a variety of current regulatory and Wall Street issues but said in
an email: “Reducing inequality and increasing upward mobility has been an
uninterrupted pursuit of hers through every job she’s held, and it continues to
this day in her work at the Clinton Foundation.”
If Mrs. Clinton runs for president, she will step into a heated debate
about the interplay between financial regulation,
growing inequality and the economic squeeze of the middle class.
The Third Way, a center-left think tank founded by two former Clinton
administration aides, has assailed Ms. Warren, saying her economic populism
would be “disastrous for Democrats.”
As Democrats debate whether to get tougher on Wall Street, the industry
appears to have taken notice. Securities and investment firm employees have given
a smaller proportion of their political donations to Democrats over the
last three years than any period for which data is available, according to the
Center for Responsive Politics.
Enough with dynasties. Half of Congress is filled with people whose family
members were elected politicians; most of D.C. Is a revolving...
Financial regulation has also become a pivotal issue in the jockeying over
who will become chairman of the Senate Banking Committee should Democrats keep
control of the Senate.
Some Wall Street donors have been unwilling to give to Senate Democrats’
re-election efforts, according to two Democratic lobbyists, because one of the
leading contenders for the chairmanship of the Banking Committee is Senator
Sherrod Brown of Ohio, who is pushing for a host of measures resisted by Wall
Street, including higher capital requirements for big banks and a closer look
at potential manipulation of commodities trading.
“I think most Democrats agree that
Wall Street is too powerful,” Mr. Brown said. “I understand some don’t — talk
to them about why. Too many in my party are too close to Wall Street.”
Few political families are closer to Wall Street than the Clintons. Their
family foundation has raised millions from financiers and the foundations of
big banks, and recently held its annual briefing for donors in the auditorium
of Goldman Sachs’s headquarters in Manhattan. Major financial firms are stocked
with Clinton alumni.
And the Clintons often interact with the titans of finance on the Manhattan
charity circuit and during their vacations in the Hamptons. Last month, Mr. and
Mrs. Clinton sat at a table with Hamilton E. James, president of the Blackstone
Group, and mingled with the billionaire David H. Koch at a benefit
for the Wildlife Conservation Society.
Mrs. Clinton has recently staked some ground in the debate over wealth and
opportunity, sprinkling speeches with calls to address what she has called the
“cancer of inequality.” In an opinion article in The Denver Post, Mrs. Clinton wrote: “No
matter who you are or where you come from, if you work hard and play by the
rules, you should have the opportunity to build a good life.”
Continue
reading the main story 76Comments
But Mrs. Clinton has also taken heat for recent comments she has made about
her family’s own wealth, including the lament about being “dead broke” after
leaving the White House.
And some on the left say Mrs. Clinton’s less combative approach to issues
of taxation, Wall Street regulation and growth — “We’re all in this mess
together,” as one person who had attended several of Mrs. Clinton’s paid
speeches described her message — was out of step with the current political
climate.
In 2016, said Michael Lux, a political consultant who worked in the Clinton
White House, “People are going to be in a surly mood, a populist mood. To have
a Democrat too close to Wall Street, raising too much money from them, having a
‘We’re all in this together’ message is a big mistake.”
A version of this article appears in print on July 8, 2014, on page A1 of
the New York edition with the headline: Wall Street Offers Clinton a Thorny
Embrace.
How Barack Obama and his cronies destroyed America’s economy
while his LA RAZA party base of illegals destroyed U.S. borders and built the
MEXICAN WELFARE STATE
IT’S OFFICIAL! The American Dream is Dead. BUT WALL STREET’S
LOOTING IS NOT OVER… It’s only just begun!
The American middle class to follow.
OBAMA’S CRONY CAPITALISM – A NATION
RULED BY CRIMINAL WALL STREET BANKSTERS AND OBAMA DONORS
Culture of Corruption: Obama and His
Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies
by Michelle Malkin
In her shocking new book, Malkin digs deep into the records
of President Obama's staff, revealing corrupt dealings, questionable pasts, and
abuses of power throughout his administration.
How Barack Obama and his cronies destroyed America’s economy
while his LA RAZA party base of illegals destroyed U.S. borders and built the
MEXICAN WELFARE STATE
IT MAY TAKE A CENTURY TO UNDO THEIR
LOOTING AND PAY THEM BACK FOR THEIR CRIMES.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/07/obama-and-his-crony-banksters-destroy.html
WHO ARE THE REAL CRIMINALS? CLINTION OR SNOWDEN?
Clinton on Edward Snowden: Who are the real criminals?
HILLARY CLINTON… just follow the dirty money… IT ONLY LEADS TO THEIR DIRTY DEEDS
WHO ARE THE REAL CRIMINALS? CLINTION OR SNOWDEN?
Clinton on Edward Snowden: Who are the real criminals?
HILLARY& BILLARY… getting filthy rich serving the filthy rich… And what have they done for America again??? Ah, er…. I forget!
HILLARY DAMAGE CONTROL $$$
THEY LIE LIKE POLITICIANS, HISPANDER LIKE THE OBAMANATION, AND SERVE THE 1% AS ALWAYS. THEIR “SPEAKING FEES” IN THE MILLIONS ARE SIMPLY PAY OFFS OR BRIBES FROM THE SPECIAL INTERESTS THEY HAVE ALWAYS SERVED.
“The Clintons still feel the need to feign that they are still in touch with the struggles of regular Americans,” said Tim Miller, the communications director for America Rising. “He laments being the president with the ‘lowest net worth’ which is akin to saying his floors are made of the cheapest marble. Then he goes on to say that they talk with people in their town. They live in one of the most elite, moneyed towns in America.
“The Clintons have lived in a 1 percent bubble for so long, their experience has become warped, and that’s a major problem in a presidential campaign,” Miller added. The couple’s home is in Chappaqua, N.Y.
HILLARY and BILLARY… collecting their back-end bribes from all the rich they served so well!
GETTING RICH FOR SERVING THE RICH… and what have they done for America again??? I forget… again!
HILLARY CLINTON… just follow the dirty money… IT ONLY LEADS TO THEIR DIRTY DEEDS
…….
there was a reason why the banksters invested so many bribes in BARACK OBAMA
even before his first term!
No bank or executive has been criminally charged in relation to
these crimes.
It is
impossible to fully calculate the human suffering that has resulted from these
crimes. Since 2003, a typical US household has lost 36 percent of its wealth,
while the poorest quarter of households have lost 68 percent of their wealth
during the same period.
No comments:
Post a Comment