(CNSNews.com) – Despite “an unprecedented
surge of illegal border crossings in the Rio Grande
Valley,” 52,701 fewer illegal aliens were deported
during Fiscal Year 2104 than during the previous
year, according to a report by U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO ARRESTS BARACK OBAMA…..
SAYS HE WILL DETAIN OBAMA IN A MEX INVADERS’
CAMP UNTIL
IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS ARE
CONCLUDED.
HERE COME THE OBAMA HORDES…..
“They are in the process of hiring 1,000 full-time staff
to quickly approve applications for the president’s illegal amnesty, which will
provide work permits, photo IDs, Social Security and Medicare to illegal
immigrants — all benefits rejected by Congress,” Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.,
said earlier this month. “This action will mean that American workers, their
sons, their daughters, their parents, will now have to compete directly for
jobs, wages, and benefits with millions of illegal immigrants.”
Even members of Congress have splintered into race-biased
groups, such as the Hispanic Caucus lead by Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a known
anti-rule-of-law proponent of illegal immigration and original signatory to the
unconstitutional Kennedy/McCain "comprehensive amnesty" bill proposal
expected to cost taxpayers an estimated $7
to $36 trillion dollars over 30-years if approved. [5.2] (He is not alone in his
disdain or the Constitution and law or anti-Americanisms, given Democratic
House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi's blocking of all progress on the SAVE Act,
which would markedly end illegal immigration by forcing criminal employers to
quit hiring illegal aliens
DEPORTATION LIES:
Obama’s conspiracy to
surrender to our borders to Mexico as he
surrender to our borders to Mexico as he
fights for the
borders of Muslim dictators over
there.
DEPORTATION LIES: Obama’s endless lies
about Homeland
about Homeland
security as he sabotages our borders and laws to build the LA RAZA
DEM
party base of illegals:
THE CONSPIRACY TO DESTROY THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS WITH
AMNESTY: Obama’s lies on deportation
GUILTY! OBAMA AND THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE HE INVITES
OBAMA’S CYNICAL JOKE of HOMELAND SECURITY
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even
a goal of the department.
Obama’s Promise of Homeland Security
to Americans (Legals) and
his Vow to Illegals of Open and Undefended Borders
With
Narcomex
NAFTA BORDERS and BILLIONAIRES
AMNESTY: America’s death warrant
THE CONSPIRACY to DESTROY AMERICA’S BORDERS… Obama
and his Wall Street banksters
“This nation no longer is a democratic
republic...rather it has
become a tool of the super-rich members of the above
mentioned elite who preselect our presidents based on their
cooperation and complicity with the elite’s ultimate goals.
Obama has, in their opinion done superbly carrying out the
plans well laid out for him by his backers.”
become a tool of the super-rich members of the above
mentioned elite who preselect our presidents based on their
cooperation and complicity with the elite’s ultimate goals.
Obama has, in their opinion done superbly carrying out the
plans well laid out for him by his backers.”
BILLIONAIRES
partner with MEXICO, OBAMA and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to assault the
AMERICAN WORKER…. Amnesty, it’s all about keeping wages depressed and passing
along the real cost of all that “cheap” mex labor to the American middle class.
OPEN BORDERS AND
ENDLESS HORDES OF IMMIGRANTS POURING IN IS ONLY ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED
To
cite just one example, if there is a shortage of U.S. engineers, are 1.5
million Americans with engineering degrees either unemployed or working in other
fields? In all too many cases, U.S. tech companies prefer foreign workers on
temporary visas because they are cheaper and more exploitable than Americans.
RASMUSSEN POLL: Voters reject the Democrat
Party’s invitation to Mexico to expand the LA
RAZA welfare state in America’s open borders
and hand millions more jobs to illegals through
amnesty.
MEXICO’S
INVASION:
THEY EXPORT
CRIMINALS, ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR WELFARE, POVERTY, HEROIN and METH…
HEROIN
WHY THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS LOVE OBAMA:
SURGE IN MEX DRUGS THROUGH OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS
According to the report, the amount of heroin seized at the southern U.S. border increased 232% between 2008 and 2012 — apparently the result of greater Mexican heroin production and a growing incursion by Mexican traffickers into U.S. markets. It notes that the U.S. is experiencing a “sizable increase” in the number of new heroin users.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/11/obamas-open-and-undefended-borders.html
Obama’s State of Delusion
22 January 2015
The delusional character of Obama’s State of the Union address on Tuesday—presenting an America of rising living standards and a booming economy, capped by his declaration that the “shadow of crisis has passed”—is perhaps matched only in its presentation by the media and supporters of the Democratic Party.The general tone was set by the New York Times in its lead editorial on Wednesday, which described the speech as a “simple, dramatic message about economic fairness, about the fact that the well-off—the top earners, the big banks, Silicon Valley—have done just great, while middle and working classes remain dead in the water.”
The attempt to present Obama’s remarks as a clarion call to combat social inequality runs first of all into the inconvenient fact that the individual supposedly making this call has been the head of state for the past six years. The Times writes as if the policies of the Obama administration—the multitrillion-dollar bailout for the banks, the coordinated assault on wages, relentless cuts to social programs and the social counterrevolution in health care known as Obamacare—have nothing to do with the record levels of social inequality that prevail in the United States.
The Times quotes Obama’s question delivered toward the beginning of the speech: “Will we accept an economy where only a few of us do spectacularly well? Or will we commit ourselves to an
economy that generates rising incomes and chances for everyone who makes an effort?”
Anyone listening to the speech with even a passing knowledge of the record of his presidency would immediately respond that, for Obama and for the entire political establishment that he heads, the answer is clearly the former.
As for the proposals themselves—including tuition assistance for community colleges, tax credits for child care and college education, an increase in the minimum wage and paid maternity leave—they consist of insincere and paltry measures, tailored to the interests of big business, that no one, least of all Obama, expects will pass.
The Times itself acknowledges, “Mr. Obama knows his prospects of getting Congress to agree are less than zero.” White House officials freely admitted ahead of the State of the Union that Obama had no expectations that the measures he proposed would be taken up on Capitol Hill. “We will not be limited by what will pass this Congress, because that would be a very boring two years,” White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer told the press before the speech.
Previous State of the Union speeches have produced similar wish lists aimed at generating illusions that Obama sought to advance a “progressive” agenda, proposals dropped as soon as the president completed the obligatory tour of photo-ops and speeches at college campuses.
In his 2014 State of the Union, Obama called for ending tax loopholes for corporations that ship jobs overseas, investing tens of billions in infrastructure projects to create jobs, making pre-kindergarten available to every four-year-old child, regardless of family income, and enacting equal pay for women. Instead, one million people were cut off food stamps, long-term unemployment remained stubbornly high, poverty increased, and wages stagnated.
On the other hand, every major initiative by Obama in domestic policy—the 2009 stimulus program, the 2010 health care reform legislation, the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul, countless budget deals with the congressional Republicans, right up to the executive order on immigration issued a month ago—was dictated by the needs of corporate America, and, in many cases, drafted by corporate lobbyists.
The consequences for working people—record long-term unemployment, a tidal wave of home foreclosures, the slashing of wages in basic industry, the steady decline in living standards over all—were not accidental. They were the deliberate goal of government policy, for both Democrats and Republicans, because mass suffering by the working class was required to obtain the resources needed to bail out the financial aristocracy.
The main purpose of Obama’s remarks was to give the various publications and organizations that orbit the Democratic Party—the Times, the Nation magazine (whose columnist John Nichols described the spech as a “serious effort to address income inequality”), the trade unions, and the network of pseudo-left organizations that present themselves as “socialist”—fodder for promoting the Democrats in the 2016 elections.
Thus, Obama’s speech was peppered with references aimed at the upper-middle class practitioners of various forms of identity politics (Time magazine, for example, enthused that Obama “made history Tuesday night” by the inclusion in his speech of one word: “transgender”).
Here is how to paint the Democratic Party in progressive colors, he was telling them. Here is how the Democratic Party will seek to fool the American people as it collaborates with the Republicans in enacting ever more right-wing policies over the next two years, combined with endless war abroad and the assault on democratic rights.
The delusions, self-delusions and lies of Obama and his supporters cannot, however, alter the underlying reality of American political life: the unbridgeable gulf between the entire state apparatus and the vast majority of the population. It is notable that Obama’s speech, delivered less than three months after the midterm elections, made no reference to the debacle that the Democratic Party suffered at the polls—due primarily to the collapse in voter turnout produced by six years of right-wing policies from the “candidate of change.”
Perhaps the most striking delusion of all is the belief by the ruling class and its representatives that it can, through a few honeyed and lying phrases, forestall the tidal wave of social opposition that is on the horizon.
Patrick Martin and Joseph Kishore
No comments:
Post a Comment