THE RIGHT-WING
CONSPIRACY TO SURRENDER OUR BORDERS FOR GREATER CORPORATE PROFITS. THE
ENTIRE CONSPIRACY BEHIND AMNESTY IS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED AND TRANSFER THE
REAL COST (WELFARE) OF THAT “CHEAP” LABOR TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS.
"NAFTA has become symbolic of the fears and apprehensions of globalization in general. "Despite promises that NAFTA would help keep Mexicans at home, illegal immigration to the U.S. has accelerated.
"NAFTA has become symbolic of the fears and apprehensions of globalization in general. "Despite promises that NAFTA would help keep Mexicans at home, illegal immigration to the U.S. has accelerated.
About two-thirds of the estimated 12 million
illegal immigrants in the United States have
arrived since 1995, according to the Pew Hispanic
Center.
NAFTA IS THE FOUNDATION OF OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS!
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer
funds for services to non-citizens --- was the last gasp of white America in
California." --- Art
Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA RAZA
SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack Obama and LA RAZA.
A
week later, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said the immigration bill was “far worse”
than ObamaCare: He described the bill as an attempt by Senate Democrats “to
establish another monolithic voting bloc” among Hispanic Americans.
HERITAGE FOUNDATION: OBAMA’S
AMNESTY WOULD ADD 100 MILLION
MORE ILLEGALS AND COST
AMERICANS (Legals) BILLIONS AND
BILLIONS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2010/03/heritage-foundation-amnesty-would-add.html
AMNESTY WOULD ADD 100 MILLION
MORE ILLEGALS AND COST
AMERICANS (Legals) BILLIONS AND
BILLIONS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2010/03/heritage-foundation-amnesty-would-add.html
NAFTA, the
BUSH, CLINTON(S), and OBAMA
DEVICE TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE-CLASS…. Is it working?
DEVICE TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE-CLASS…. Is it working?
“This
nation no longer is a democratic republic...rather it has become a tool of the
super-rich members of the above mentioned elite who preselect our presidents
based on their cooperation and complicity with the elite’s ultimate goals.
Obama has, in their opinion done superbly carrying out the plans well laid out
for him by his backers.”
MORE ON THE NAFTA CONSPIRACY TO SURRENDER OUR
BORDERS TO NARCOMEX TO ASSURE A STEADY FLOOD
OF “CHEAP” LABOR LOOTING MEXICANS
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
GO TO THIS LINK FOR MORE ON THE NAFTA CONSPIRACY:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045
“Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) warned his colleagues in Congress that Americans
will vote them out of office in November if they do not act this week to thwart
President Barack Obama's plans to grant work permits and amnesty to up to eight
million more Americans via executive fiat.”
BUT
WHAT IF THERE ARE REALLY 40 MILLION LOOTING ILLEGALS AND THEIR BREEDING ANCHOR
BABIES LIKE BUNNIES FOR GRINGO WEFLARE!
FROM
WASHINGTON STATE…. if you thought Mexico ONLY occupied and looted the former
American southwest!
"They hauled them down to the
border," Sakuma said. "Three days later, they were standing in our
office, but they had a different name and a different Social Security
number."
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE BY TOM HALL IS FROM THE WORLD
SOCIALIST PARTY, WHICH IS AN ANTI-AMERICAN COMMUNIST FRONT THAT SIDES WITH
EVERY FASCIST DICTATORSHIP ON THE GLOBE.
SANDERS STANDS UP TO THE KOCH BROTHERS AND THEIR NAFTA
CONSPIRACY TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED WITH ENDLESS HORDES OF MEXICANS JUMPING OUR
BORDERS. THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS WOULD STILL GET THE TAX BILLS FOR MEXICO’S
WELFARE STATE IN OUR OPEN BORDERS.
Sanders’ wording cannot be dismissed as
a gaff.
On the contrary, it conforms to his political
record. In 2007 and 2009, he co-sponsored bills
with Republican Congressman Chuck Grassley
that would have restricted the federal visa
program, citing the need to protect American
jobs. He has opposed trade deals with China on
the grounds of protecting American jobs and
“sovereignty,” and denounced transnational
corporations for making profits overseas
instead of at home, which he portrays as
tantamount to treason.
On the contrary, it conforms to his political
record. In 2007 and 2009, he co-sponsored bills
with Republican Congressman Chuck Grassley
that would have restricted the federal visa
program, citing the need to protect American
jobs. He has opposed trade deals with China on
the grounds of protecting American jobs and
“sovereignty,” and denounced transnational
corporations for making profits overseas
instead of at home, which he portrays as
tantamount to treason.
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE BY TOM HALL IS FROM THE WORLD
SOCIALIST PARTY, WHICH IS AN ANTI-AMERICAN COMMUNIST FRONT THAT SIDES WITH
EVERY FASCIST DICTATORSHIP ON THE GLOBE.
Bernie Sanders pits US
workers against
immigrants in Vox interview
immigrants in Vox interview
By Tom Hall
30 July 2015
30 July 2015
The campaign of
Bernie Sanders, the self-described “socialist” senator running for the
Democratic presidential nomination, continues to attract widespread support.
Many workers, youth and students, deeply alienated from establishment politics,
are intrigued by the prospect of a socialist candidate.
As Sanders has
climbed in the polls, however, the pro-capitalist and nationalist content of
his politics has become increasingly clear. An interview with Sanders released
Tuesday by former Washington Post writer Ezra Klein for the Vox web site
is particularly revealing in this regard.
About halfway through
the interview, Klein asks Sanders about his attitude towards immigration. “You
said being a democratic socialist means a more international view,” Klein says.
“I think if you take global poverty that seriously, it leads you to conclusions
that in the US are considered out of political bounds. Things like sharply
raising the level of immigration we permit, even up to a level of open
borders.”
SANDERS SAYS “OPEN
BORDERS”? NO, THAT’S A KOCH BROTHERS PROPOSAL…. THAT’S A RIGHT-WING PROPOSAL,
WHICH SAYS ESSENTIALLY THERE IS NO UNITED STATES…. IT WOULD MAKE EVERYBODY IN
AMERICA POORER.”
At this point, Sanders
abruptly cuts off Klein, saying, “Open borders? No, that’s a Koch brothers
proposal.” “Really?” Klein responds, apparently taken aback. “Of course,”
Sanders replies. “That’s a right-wing proposal, which says essentially there is
no United States… It would make everybody in America poorer.”
“RIGHT-WING PEOPLE IN
THIS COUNTRY WOULD LOVE AN OPEN BORDER POLICY. BRING IN ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE,
WORK FOR $2 OR $3 AN HOUR. THAT WOULD BE GREAT FOR THEM.”
Sanders continues:
“You’re doing away with the concept of a nation state, and I don’t think
there’s any country in the world that believes in that… What right-wing people
in this country would love is an open border policy. Bring in all kinds of
people, work for $2 or $3 an hour. That would be great for them… You think we
should open the borders and bring in a lot of low-wage workers, or do you think
maybe we should try to get jobs for those [American] kids?”
Sanders is here
referring to Charles and David Koch, the Republican billionaires who have
pledged to spend nearly a billion dollars in the 2016 election cycle to promote
right-wing candidates. In characterizing an open immigration policy as a “Koch
brothers proposal,” Sanders is apparently alluding to their support for limited
immigration “reform” of the kind that passed through the Senate in 2013,
combining limited avenues for citizenship for current undocumented immigrants
with a draconian militarization of the US-Mexico border.
Sanders’ own position
more closely aligns with the Republican right than even that of the Koch
brothers. Wisconsin Governor and Republican presidential candidate Scott
Walker, whose claim to fame is forcing through reactionary anti-worker legislation
over mass opposition in 2011, echoed Sanders’ argument virtually word-for-word
on the Glenn Beck Program in April, declaring: “The next president and the next
Congress need to make decisions about a legal immigration system that’s based
on, first and foremost, protecting American workers and American wages.”
Sanders’ argument
that open borders would “make everybody in America poorer” takes for granted
the enforced division between American and immigrant workers and the
super-exploitation of the latter. It also implicitly accepts as permanent the
continued monopolization of wealth in the US by a tiny financial aristocracy.
The expropriation of this parasitic social layer would, in and of itself,
provide substantial resources to raise the wages and living standards of all
workers in the US, native-born and immigrant alike.
Sanders has called
for a “political revolution” against the “billionaire class.” But his
chauvinist position on immigration not only demonstrates his opposition to the
unification of the working class, it also underscores his refusal to propose
any measures that seriously challenge social inequality. That is because to do
so requires championing an attack on entrenched wealth and capitalist private
ownership of the banks, corporations and natural resources.
WSWS.ORG WILL NEVER BE FOUND CRITIZING THE MEXICAN DICTATORSHIP FOR DOING NOTHING FOR THEIR PEOPLE BUT EXPORTING THEM TO LOOT AMERICA!
WSWS.ORG WILL NEVER BE FOUND CRITIZING THE MEXICAN DICTATORSHIP FOR DOING NOTHING FOR THEIR PEOPLE BUT EXPORTING THEM TO LOOT AMERICA!
Sanders opposes any
such struggle. Hence, his claim that allowing workers of all nations to come to
the United States and live and work with full citizenship and democratic
rights—a basic principle of genuine socialism—would “make everybody in America
poorer.”
By promoting economic
nationalism and protectionism, Sanders implicitly argues in favor of American
workers lining up behind “their” bosses and government against workers of other
countries. So much for his supposed hostility to the American “billionaire
class!”
While Democratic
politicians, along with their agents in the trade union bureaucracy, have long
utilized the supposed threat of foreign labor to whip up nationalist sentiment
within the working class, Sanders takes this position to its logical
conclusion, openly promoting the sanctity of the American nation state.
The implications of
this position are profoundly reactionary. Sanders’ insinuation that open
borders would lead to the dissolution of the United States is an argument whose
logic leads to fascistic conclusions. Sanders is not a fascist, but his
suggestion that immigrants pose a threat to the American nation state recalls
the type of arguments and slogans utilized in Germany during the Nazi period.
These included the notion of “überfremdung”—the inundation of the Fatherland by
foreign, non-Aryan elements.
Sanders’ wording cannot be dismissed as
a gaff. On the contrary, it conforms to his political record. In 2007 and 2009,
he co-sponsored bills with Republican Congressman Chuck Grassley that would
have restricted the federal visa program, citing the need to protect American
jobs. He has opposed trade deals with China on the grounds of protecting
American jobs and “sovereignty,” and denounced transnational corporations for
making profits overseas instead of at home, which he portrays as tantamount to
treason.
The democratic right
of workers to live and work wherever they choose is a basic principle of
socialism. It is bound up with opposition to nationalism, which is the
essential ideology of the bourgeoisie, and promotion of internationalism, i.e.,
the recognition of the fundamental identity of interests of all workers,
regardless of nationality, race, ethnicity, religion or gender, and the
struggle to unite workers across national borders against their common
exploiters, the capitalists of all countries.
Socialism strives for
the dismantling of the nation-state system, which is rooted in capitalist
private ownership of the means of production, and which, like private ownership,
collides at every point with the progressive and rational development of man’s
productive forces. The contradiction today between the global economy and the
nation-state system is the breeding ground for conflicts between the major
powers that threaten mankind with a nuclear Third World War. Only the
mobilization of the international working class against imperialist war based
on the fight for world socialism can prevent such a catastrophe.
Democrat politicians partner with Mexico and the
Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “The Race” to
loot America and then send the tax bills to the
American middle-class whose jobs LA RAZA owns.
Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “The Race” to
loot America and then send the tax bills to the
American middle-class whose jobs LA RAZA owns.
AMNESTY: America’s death warrant
THE CONSPIRACY to DESTROY AMERICA’S BORDERS… Obama
and his Wall Street banksters
“This nation no longer is a democratic
republic...rather it has become a tool of the super-rich members of the above
mentioned elite who preselect our presidents based on their cooperation and
complicity with the elite’s ultimate goals. Obama has, in their opinion done
superbly carrying out the plans well laid out for him by his backers.”
BILLIONAIRES partner with
MEXICO, OBAMA and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to
assault the AMERICAN WORKER…. Amnesty, it’s all about keeping wages depressed and
passing along the real cost of all that “cheap” mex labor to the American middle class.
assault the AMERICAN WORKER…. Amnesty, it’s all about keeping wages depressed and
passing along the real cost of all that “cheap” mex labor to the American middle class.
OPEN BORDERS AND
ENDLESS HORDES OF IMMIGRANTS POURING IN IS ONLY ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/08/billionaires-for-la-raza-supremacy.html
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/08/billionaires-for-la-raza-supremacy.html
To cite just one
example, if there is a shortage of U.S. engineers, are 1.5 million Americans
with engineering degrees either unemployed or working in other fields? In all
too many cases, U.S. tech companies prefer foreign workers on temporary visas
because they are cheaper and more exploitable than Americans.
UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS
OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
“At
the hearing, Dr. Rakesh Kochar, Associate Director for
Research at the Pew Hispanic Center, testified that in the year
following the official end of the recession (June 2009), foreign-
born workers gained 656,000 jobs while native-born workers lost
an additional 1.2 million jobs.”
Research at the Pew Hispanic Center, testified that in the year
following the official end of the recession (June 2009), foreign-
born workers gained 656,000 jobs while native-born workers lost
an additional 1.2 million jobs.”
"We
have a situation where the job market — the bottom fell out, yet we kept legal
immigration relatively high without even a national debate," he said.
"As a consequence, a lot of the job growth has been going to
immigrants."
Mr.
Obama did take action this year to grant many illegal immigrants up to 30 years
of age a tentative legal status that prevents them from being deported and
authorizes them to work in the United States.
Some
Republicans in Congress have criticized Mr. Obama's policy, saying it violates
his powers and will mean more competition for scarce jobs.
The term “illegal migrant” should never be
used. As any other
person, migrants are not “illegal.” They are in an “irregular”
situation or “undocumented”. The term “illegal” is not accurate; it
is misleading, contributes to negative stereotyping and criminalizes
migrants. Irregular entry and stay are administrative offenses, not
criminal offenses. – Media Friendly Glossary on Migration.
person, migrants are not “illegal.” They are in an “irregular”
situation or “undocumented”. The term “illegal” is not accurate; it
is misleading, contributes to negative stereotyping and criminalizes
migrants. Irregular entry and stay are administrative offenses, not
criminal offenses. – Media Friendly Glossary on Migration.
Fact Check: This “glossary” is the product of
George Soros’ Opens Society Foundations. The multi-billionaire Soros funnels
money through these foundations to weaken American sovereignty by promoting
open borders and other globalist agendas. The glossary is being sent to the
media to persuade them not to describe illegal aliens as Illegal, and use other
terms such as the thoroughly dishonest term “undocumented.” Its use would have
us believe
that their lack of legal documents has nothing
to with their being here illegally.
that their lack of legal documents has nothing
to with their being here illegally.
Obviously Glossary’s authors intend to change
public perceptions with the manipulation of language. The goal is to make us
believe that it is no big deal when foreigners violate our immigration laws and
disrespect our national sovereignty. Indeed, these manipulators seek to shift
censure away from foreign lawbreakers to those who object by depicting the
latter as bigots who practice “negative stereotyping.”
Also, the Glossary aims to strengthen the
claim increasingly used by illegal alien advocates that illegal residence in
the U.S. is not a crime, but an “administrative offense” (whatever that is).
This claim simply isn’t true.
As Mike Nicely, writing for the Center for
Immigration Studies observes, “Federal [law] (8 USC 1325) outlines the elements
of illegal entry and establishes penalties for the crime. A first offense may
be charged as a misdemeanor and the violator is subject to a fine and imprisonment
for not more than six months. Subsequent violations may be charged as a felony
with the violator exposed to a fine and imprisonment for not more than two
years.”
Evidently, illegal alien advocates don’t
regard misdemeanor violations (for a first offense) as a significant law
violation, even though it carries a penalty of up to six months imprisonment.
Another point to keep in mind is that illegal aliens residing in the U.S. for
any length of time use fraudulent documents to obtain jobs and social benefits.
Such use is a felony offense.
Soros and those who share his agenda don’t
care
about the immigration laws that uphold and
safeguard our national sovereignty. The reason, it
would seem is that they don’t think our
nationhood and sovereignty are significant.
about the immigration laws that uphold and
safeguard our national sovereignty. The reason, it
would seem is that they don’t think our
nationhood and sovereignty are significant.
AMERICA: NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!!!
It started the day Obama moved into the White House and
commenced the perpetration of his “hope & change”.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in
U.S.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in U.S.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in U.S.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in U.S.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in U.S.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in U.S.
24,639,000: Record Number of Foreign-Born Hold Jobs in U.S.
"We could cut
unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal
workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the
American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help
citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than
fail to enforce immigration laws."
MEXICANS ABOVE THE LAW IN AMERICA… a nation under LA RAZA occupation
MEXICANS ABOVE THE LAW IN AMERICA… a nation under LA RAZA occupation
U.S.
capitulates (again) to LA RAZA SUPREMACY (mexifornia)
NARCOmex
AMBASSADOR ORDERS LA RAZA SUPREMACY FOR MEXICANS
ILLEGALLY LOOTING IN AMERICAN BORDERS and JOBS.
ILLEGALLY LOOTING IN AMERICAN BORDERS and JOBS.
U.S. CAPITULATES ON THE SPOT!
With colossal impertinence, the Mexican
government attacked Texas Gov. Rick Perry for sending National Guard troops to
guard our Southern border, saying that Mexico "deeply rejects and condemns
the deployment." The Mexicans accused Perry of taking this action to
advance his political ambitions.
INCOME PLUMMETS UNDER OBAMA… most jobs go to
illegals.
AS HIS CRONY BANKSTERS CONTINUE TO LOOT, INCOMES PLUMMET FOR
AMERICANS (LEGALS).
GOOD TIME FOR AMNESTY FOR MILLIONS OF LOOTING MEXICANS?
MORE HERE:
“The yearly income of a typical US household dropped by a
massive 12 percent, or $6,400, in the six years between 2007 and 2013. This is
just one of the findings of the 2013 Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer
Finances released Thursday, which documents a sharp decline in working class
living standards and a further concentration of wealth in the hands of the rich
and the super-rich.”
UNIONS AFL-CIO
OBAMA BROKE
PROMISE ON IMMIGRATION??? Not really! Illegals are pouring over our borders in
response to Obama’s bit by bit amnesty.
AND UNIONS?
What promise have they kept to the AMERICAN (Legals) worker?
THE REASON WHY OUR BORDERS ARE WIDE OPEN, EVEN IN TIMES OF GLOBAL TERRORISM, IS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/08/afl-cio-president-richard-trumka-smells.html
AND WHAT HAS THE BLOOD SUCKING UNIONS DONE ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN WORKER?
AND WHAT HAS THE BLOOD SUCKING UNIONS DONE ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN WORKER?
AMNESTY: America’s death warrant
BILLIONAIRES partner with
MEXICO, OBAMA and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to assault the AMERICAN WORKER….
Amnesty, it’s all about keeping wages depressed and passing along the real cost
of all that “cheap” mex labor to the American middle class.
NAFTA
OBAMA’S AGENDA OF A BORDERLESS LOOTING ZONE FOR LA RAZA!
OBAMA’S AGENDA OF A BORDERLESS LOOTING ZONE FOR LA RAZA!
THE OBAMA – McCAIN STEALTH
SURRENDER of OUR BORDERS
“What
we're seeing is our Congress and
national leadership dismantling our laws by
not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the
norm, just like Third World corruption.
Illegal aliens now have more rights and
privileges than Americans. If you are an
illegal alien, you can drive a car without a
driver's license or insurance. You may obtain
medical care without paying. You may work
without paying taxes. Your children enjoy
free education at the expense of taxpaying
Americans.”
national leadership dismantling our laws by
not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the
norm, just like Third World corruption.
Illegal aliens now have more rights and
privileges than Americans. If you are an
illegal alien, you can drive a car without a
driver's license or insurance. You may obtain
medical care without paying. You may work
without paying taxes. Your children enjoy
free education at the expense of taxpaying
Americans.”
AMNESTY: WILLIAM GHEEN (ALIPAC)
EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA TO SURRENDER OUR BORDERS TO MEXICO
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Dem administration advancing 'North American
Union' agenda
THE
ROAD TO TYRANNY: LET ME COUNT THE WAYS
By
Dave Hodges
NewsWithViews.com
NewsWithViews.com
Humanity is under attack from so many directions, it is
difficult to count the ways.
We are under attack from the skies and through the poisoning
of our air through massive chemical spraying complete with Alzheimer’s and dementia
causing aluminum sulfate and cancer causing barium.
Fukashima radiation, Corexit spraying and the resulting toxic rain from
the Gulf oil spill is running rampant over our country and not one ounce of
mainstream media coverage is afforded to these dangers. Prevention and
remediation from these dangers are not put into place by our present
government.
Our water is being systematically removed from the country
by Nestle, and our water
tables are being systematically compromised by environmental toxins and of
course many Americans are consuming water permeated with IQ-lowering rocket
fuel (i.e., fluoride).
Our food is being poisoned through the rampant use of
cancer-causing MSG products, and the unlabeled, unregulated and cancer-causing
Monsanto GMO's.
Under the guise of fighting terrorism, Americans are now
facing illegal detention, torture and murder. The Military Commissions Act and the John Warner Defense Authorization Act.
The average citizen is now labeled as a terrorist by Homeland Security as their
inspired documents, such as the MIAC Report, define domestic
terrorism as the mere act of criticizing our governmental leaders, supporting
Ron Paul, being a Libertarian, being a member of the Constitution Party, being
a Second Amendment supporter and demanding that our leaders follow the
Constitution. By virtue of the fact that you have visited this web site, you
could now be considered to be a domestic terrorist.
Our
national sovereignty and manufacturing base has been
destroyed through NAFTA and CAFTA which has resulted in
totally open borders culminating in the overwhelming of our
infrastructure, hospital emergency rooms and our educational
institutions by the human onslaught which will be soon be at
unprecedented levels which promise to bring 150 million
additional immigrants to our country by 2040.
destroyed through NAFTA and CAFTA which has resulted in
totally open borders culminating in the overwhelming of our
infrastructure, hospital emergency rooms and our educational
institutions by the human onslaught which will be soon be at
unprecedented levels which promise to bring 150 million
additional immigrants to our country by 2040.
Obama’s administration has openly engaged in human smuggling
as well as drug and gun trafficking to criminal cartels, in programs such as “Fast and Furious.”
Bush and Obama have illegally entered America into the sovereignty snatching
SPP through the implementation of the North American Union.
Our property rights and water rights as well as our right to
farm in traditional ways are being destroyed through the implementation of the
pseudo-environmentalist, Agenda 21 programs at the
local level. As a result, massive food shortages and outright famines are right
around the corner.
America is being de-industrialized through the global
warming scam and the accompanying illegal cap and trade schemes. Meanwhile, as the New York Times reports,
Ugandan villages are being burned down and replaced with trees in the name of
saving the planet through carbon offset programs. This insane application of
carbon trading is now being enforced by American military boots on the ground
in Uganda. Next year, you will see roving blackouts and the doubling of utility
rates as Obama makes good on his campaign promise of “necessarily skyrocketing utility rates.”
Americans will soon be subjected to the death panels of
Obama care in which citizens over the age of 70 are officially
referred to as “units” and are targeted for comfort care but not given life
saving measures. This is an undeniable, unmitigated
and naked version of Eugenics cast in the same flavor as that practiced by
Margaret Sanger and Adolph Hitler.
In the meantime, our youth are under attack through mercury laden vaccines which also contains the immune
system destroying properties of the flu vaccine adjuvants of MF 59, Squaylene
and now we find that the active ingredient for Lyme disease is in the
patent for the current flu vaccine. One in 58 boys are now autistic
courtesy of the pollutants in the vaccines.
America is now witnessing the final stages of the
installation of a police state surveillance grid through the creation and
installation of video cameras and microphones in the Homeland Security funded Intellistreet light poles. The National
Security Administration listens to our every call, their computers read every
email and fax, courtesy of Echelon. Americans are being encouraged, by Big Sis, to spy on another as we
purchase the Chinese slave labor products at Walmart.
Our homes are being stolen through the use of fraudulent robo signers and illegal repossessions without the mortgage note in order that the six mega banks can double and triple their illegitimate profits off each home they are able to steal and resell again and again.
Our homes are being stolen through the use of fraudulent robo signers and illegal repossessions without the mortgage note in order that the six mega banks can double and triple their illegitimate profits off each home they are able to steal and resell again and again.
This week, Americans have discovered that the Federal Reserve (i.e., Goldman Sachs) is giving
our money away to their private banking interests, (aka) their subsidiary holdings,
in Europe.
Additionally, more of our money has been stolen with the complicit participation of ex-Goldman Sachs federal government overseers like Gary Gensler who has failed to deliver even one indictment of his ex-Goldman Sachs partner, John Corzine, and his MF Global theft ring resulting for the “loss” of $3 billion dollars in private accounts. John Corzine and his governmental partner in crime, Gary Gensler, have established the legal precedent of stealing from private American accounts. The net effect is that YOU have no retirement. YOU have no social security. YOU have no bank account. Soon, everything YOU own will all belong to the banksters!
Our “public servants” in Congress (e.g., Nancy Pelosi) self-admittedly, on 60 Minutes, routinely engage in stock market insider trading which they have made legal for themselves, but would send you to prison for doing the same.
Additionally, more of our money has been stolen with the complicit participation of ex-Goldman Sachs federal government overseers like Gary Gensler who has failed to deliver even one indictment of his ex-Goldman Sachs partner, John Corzine, and his MF Global theft ring resulting for the “loss” of $3 billion dollars in private accounts. John Corzine and his governmental partner in crime, Gary Gensler, have established the legal precedent of stealing from private American accounts. The net effect is that YOU have no retirement. YOU have no social security. YOU have no bank account. Soon, everything YOU own will all belong to the banksters!
Our “public servants” in Congress (e.g., Nancy Pelosi) self-admittedly, on 60 Minutes, routinely engage in stock market insider trading which they have made legal for themselves, but would send you to prison for doing the same.
Every day, the TSA conducts heinous acts against the
American people, such as strip searching and injuring 85 year old ladies,
grabbing the genitals of our children and wives and largely engaging in acts
which, if performed by you, would land you in jail for five years. Your body
and your self-respect belong to the globalists and their minions.
Even with all of these hideous events now hiding in plain
sight, I have never called for a revolution against our increasingly
illegitimate government, or, should I say against the banksters who have
hijacked our Republic, until now. There are so many more heinous acts being
committed against the American people that it is difficult to count all the
ways that tyranny is being installed in America. Even Ray Charles could see the
depth and scope of this all out war which has been declared on all of us.
Our Congress has an all-time low 9% approval rating and as a
result, Congress has taken up sides with those who would exterminate most and
enslave the remainder of us with the new indefinite detention bill, S. 1867.
Very soon, we will live in an America in which the
government can declare peaceful dissent, public criticism, and the failure to
comply to globalists’ trickle down tyranny as an act of terror in which YOU are
subject to secret arrest, torture and even murder. The dead spirits of Mao,
Stalin and Hitler are coalescing in the hall of congress and you are their
newest target! These congressional criminals have declared war on you and your
families. Many of our countrymen have been given a death sentence, but are
sadly oblivious to the new place in history that we all occupy. The finishing
touches of the establishment of a tyrannical government are being put into play
as I write these words.
Many of you, because of your political and moral advocacy,
have a bull’s eye on your back. As with all patterns of tyranny from Stalin to
Hitler to Mao, the chess pieces have been laid into place for your final
demise. The police state grid is in place as are the FEMA death camps. WWWIIII
will soon be upon us. They will be coming for your guns under the coming
martial law which will accompany the coming war. As with all tyrannical
governments which confiscate guns, they will be coming for you following the
disarming of the American people. Read your history! The playbook of the
globalists is located in your former 10th grade World History books. This is
the unmistakable pattern of tyranny!!!
To those who think that S. 1867 will result in many of us
being transported to your neighborhood FEMA camp to await an unknown fate is
tin foil hat territory; please consider that KBR, a subsidiary of Halliburton, is in the
process of activating the FEMA camps according to a leaked memo.
As if America needs anymore proof of the tyranny which lies ahead, perhaps the
remaining doubters would like to email Bob Siefert at Bob.siefert@kbr.com
the KBR administrator in charge of this action and ask him why the camps are
being activated. Thanks to the Alex Jones staff for publicizing this memo.
While in the Soviet Gulag Alexsandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn
and his fellow victims, lamented that they did not mount a resistance when the
Secret Police came and dragged people out of their homes and sent them to
Siberia. We will soon be faced with the same choice.
Our entire governmental leadership is a self-admitted
criminal enterprise system as it lawless; it is devoid of empathy, compassion
or has any remaining vestiges of the system of Constitutional fair play which
was bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers.
The 300 or so banksters who have hijacked our government are
mentally ill. They are sociopathic serial killers. They (e.g., George Soros,
Warren Buffet, David Rockefeller, etc.) destroy economies, ferment violent
revolutions and start wars which kill millions. In short, they are the modern
day version of the money changers that Jesus chased from the Temple.
To the police and the military that are going to be told to
enforce this globalist, tyrannical takeover and subsequent subjugation of
America, I ask all of you: Which side of history will you be on? Are you going
to mindlessly obey the soon-to-be illegitimate orders emanating from these
despots, or, are you going to uphold your sworn oath to protect and defend the
Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic? Do you really think
that your military retirements and police pensions are going to be waiting for
you when your tyrannical deeds are done? Again, Mr. Law enforcement official
read your history.
What did Hitler do with the very people who helped him gain
control over the German government? The simple answer is that Hitler killed all
of them without blinking an eye. If you, as a law enforcement official or
member of the military obey these banksters and minions, you better hope that
this globalist takeover is successful and complete.
For if the real terrorists on this planet are not successful
in gaining absolute control over America, there will be nowhere that you can
hide if you commit despotic acts against our fellow Americans. The vengeance of
the people of this country will be carried out against all of those who would
dare raise an illegitimate hand against the American people in the servitude of
these banksters which will begin with trials which will make the Nuremburg Trials look like a traffic court.
As a result of the passage of Senate bill 1867, Ninety three
United States Senators have drawn a line in the sand which will result in the
bifurcation of America into two distinct camps. There are those who will serve
the satanic globalist regime and then there is everybody else. The fundamental
question remains for all military and law enforcement personnel, what side are you
on and what are the rest of us going to do about it?
“Tis Time to Part” -Thomas Paine
Dave Hodges is an award winning psychology, sociology,
statistics and research professor, a college basketball coach as well as a
former mental health counselor. Dave also serves as the spokesperson to the
newly formed national coalition, The American Coalition to Protect Personal
Property Rights, which is designed to combat the growing erosion of personal
property rights across America.
Often referred to America’s most independent talk show host,
Dave Hodges is the host of the nationally syndicated, hard-hitting and exciting
investigative radio talk show called “The Common Sense Show.” “The Common Sense
Show” airs on the Republic Broadcasting Network every Sunday evening from
9-11pm Central. The show features an array of impressive guests coupled with an
in-depth analysis of important personal, social and geopolitical issues which
are largely unreported in the mainstream media. The wide variety of show topics
ranges from the loss of constitutional liberties, to the subsequent
implementation of a police state under world governance, to exploring the
limits of human potential. The primary purpose of “The Common Sense Show” is to
provide the listening audience with the tools necessary to reclaim both their
individual freedoms and national sovereignty.
To learn more about his radio talk show please visit:
Clinton
Tests Out Populist Approach... it's her "Hope & Change" huckster's approach.... but haven't we heard that crap before???
Obama Cites NAFTA in Questioning Her Criticism of Corporate
World
By Perry Bacon Jr. and Alec MacGillisWashington Post Staff
WritersMonday, February 25, 2008; A01
PROVIDENCE,
R.I., Feb. 24 -- Blasting "companies shamelessly turning their backs on
Americans" by shipping jobs overseas and railing that "it is wrong
that somebody who makes $50 million on Wall Street
pays a lower tax rate than somebody who makes $50,000 a year," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton increasingly sounds like one
of her old Democratic rivals, former senator John Edwards
of North Carolina.
Eager
to recapture the white, working-class voters who favored her in some of the
early primaries but who have since shifted to Sen. Barack
Obama, Clinton traded her usual wonky style this weekend for a fiery,
populist tone in speeches in Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island.
Instead
of giving precise policy details, she repeatedly pointed her finger skyward,
declared that Americans "got shafted under President
Bush" and cast herself as a fighter, as Edwards often described
himself, promising to help most Americans, not just the "wealthy and the
connected."
In
an appearance here Sunday afternoon, she mocked Obama's hopeful rhetoric,
declaring that it is not the answer to fighting entrenched interests.
"I
could stand up here and say, 'Let's just get everybody together, let's get
unified, the sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be
singing, and everyone will know we should do the right thing and the world will
be perfect,' " she said, as people cheered and laughed. "You are not
going to wave a magic wand and have the special interests disappear." AREN'T THESE THE VERY "SPECIAL INTERESTS" THAT HAVE FLOODED HER PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY WITH TENS OF MILLIONS???
On
Saturday, Clinton charged Obama with sending out a mailer that unfairly quoted
her as saying that NAFTA had been a "boon" for America, a word that
Obama acknowledged Clinton had not used. But the senator from Illinois kept up his attack on Sunday while speaking to
dozens of workers at a gypsum plant in Lorain, Ohio.
"Yesterday,
Senator Clinton also said I'm wrong to point out that she once supported NAFTA.
But the fact is, she was saying great things about NAFTA until she started
running for president. A couple years after it passed, she said NAFTA was a
'free and fair trade agreement' and that it was 'proving its worth.' And in
2004, she said, 'I think, on balance, NAFTA has been good for New York state and America.' "
The
senator from New York has tried to distance herself from NAFTA, which is
unpopular among workers in manufacturing who believe the deal has contributed
to the movement of jobs overseas. In Ohio on Saturday, Clinton argued that
while NAFTA "passed" during husband Bill
Clinton's administration in 1993, President George
H.W. Bush actually "negotiated" the deal. Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland (D), a Clinton backer, told Bloomberg News this weekend that Bill Clinton told him
Hillary Clinton had opposed NAFTA in 1993.
In
Lorain, Obama blamed NAFTA for the loss of 1 million jobs since 1994, including
50,000 in the Buckeye State, and ridiculed Clinton's efforts to distance
herself from the trade deal. "It was her own husband who got NAFTA
passed," Obama said. "In her own book, Senator Clinton called NAFTA
one of 'Bill's successes' and 'legislative victories.' "
Clinton
is trying to assume the populist mantle of Edwards -- whom she described in
December as "screaming," in his critiques of special interests --
with March 4 looming as the decisive day for her candidacy. Four states will
vote that day, but Bill Clinton, among others, has said that his wife must win
the two largest -- Ohio and Texas -- to continue her campaign.
Her
campaign aides say wooing both working-class voters and middle-income people
concerned about the economy is crucial, particularly in Ohio.
"These
are the voters who are up for grabs," said Doug Hattaway, a Clinton
adviser.
During
the campaign, Clinton has often criticized trade agreements and the movement of
jobs overseas. Over the weekend, she adopted a far more pointed tone and spent
a lot of time emphasizing her populist message, reducing mentions of issues
such as balancing the budget that have been standard in her speeches. She spent
less time on the intricacies of her health-care plan and her proposal to
withdraw troops from Iraq, heeding advice from
aides who have urged her to speak in broader terms.
Clinton
is seeking to get past the loss of 11 straight contests to Obama and to shore
up the support of groups that have been key to her candidacy. In the states
where she has performed strongly, Clinton has won among households with less
than $50,000 in income, among people without college degrees and among families
with at least one member in a labor union. But in last week's primary in Wisconsin, she lost all three groups.
White,
working-class men, in particular, are a key voting bloc in a race where blacks
have overwhelmingly supported Obama and white women have backed Clinton. A Washington Post-ABC News
poll last week showed Clinton leading overall in Ohio, where she led among
white men, while the candidates were tied in Texas, where Obama had an
advantage among white men.
James
Rivard, a Cleveland technician who was polled and
whose family makes less than $50,000, said he is leaning toward Obama but wants
to hear more about the economy. "My income has been stagnant for like 12
years now, but my expenses have continued to go up, while all of this capital
is leaving the country every year," he said.
NAFTA
has had its trade-offs for the U.S.
Consumers and global
companies benefitted, but critics see pitfalls.
By Marla Dickerson
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 3, 2008
MEXICO CITY — Four campaign seasons have come and gone since
presidential hopeful H. Ross Perot warned that NAFTA would
create a "giant sucking sound" of jobs going to Mexico, and the
trade pact is still generating plenty of noise.
MEXICO CONTROLLED BY
ORGANIZED CRIME.
By Marla Dickerson
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 3, 2008
MEXICO CITY — Four campaign seasons have come and gone since
presidential hopeful H. Ross Perot warned that NAFTA would
create a "giant sucking sound" of jobs going to Mexico, and the
trade pact is still generating plenty of noise.
Calls to renegotiate the 14-year-old deal are
rising from both sides of the border.Thousands of protesters paralyzed traffic
in Mexico's capital in January to demand a redo of the pact, which they said
had hurt Mexican farmers. In the U.S., the North American Free Trade Agreement
looms large in states such as Ohio, which hosts a crucial presidential primary
Tuesday.The Rust Belt has shed hundreds of thousands of factory jobs since
1994, when the U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade bloc was implemented. Ohio alone had
lost a net 50,000 jobs as a result of NAFTA, according to a 2006 analysis by
the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary
Rodham Clinton, who are campaigning for the Democratic nomination, say the deal
needs to be retooled to protect American workers."Let's get real about
NAFTA. It simply isn't working for all Americans," Clinton said at a
recent rally in Youngstown, Ohio. If elected, she said, she would call for a
temporary freeze on new trade pacts and a thorough review of existing ones.
Obama wants stronger labor and environmental provisions put into NAFTA and
other accords.Whether talk of revamping NAFTA amounts to more than
election-year stumping remains to be seen. Three-way trade has soared and
unemployment in the U.S. is substantially lower now than it was 14 years ago --
4.9% in January 2008 compared with 6.6% in January 1994. American shoppers have
benefited from lower prices on imported goods, and U.S.-based multinational
companies have boosted their competitiveness by whittling production costs.Yet
there is growing wariness among the public that the U.S. is giving away more
than it's getting. After all, the nation has lost 3.1 million manufacturing
jobs since 1994, and its trade deficit with Mexico and Canada has risen to
$138.5 billion last year from $9.1 billion in 1993.Lawmakers who are critical
of the Bush administration's trade policies picked up 37 congressional seats in
the 2006 election, according to Global Trade Watch, a Washington-based advocacy
group. Although Congress approved a free trade pact with Peru in December,
pending deals with Colombia, Panama and South Korea are stalled.It's not just
Democrats who want a time out. Six in 10 Republican voters said that free trade
had hurt the U.S. and that they would support tougher import restrictions,
according to a Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll in October."We're seeing
the strongest opposition to free trade expansion in recent memory," said
Eric Farnsworth, vice president of the Council of the Americas, a
Washington-based business group that promotes open markets in the Western
Hemisphere. "NAFTA has become
symbolic of the fears and apprehensions of
globalization in general. "Despite promises that
NAFTA would help keep
Mexicans at home,
illegal immigration to the U.S. has accelerated.
About
two-thirds of the estimated 12 million
illegal immigrants in the United States have
arrived since 1995, according to the Pew Hispanic
Center.
Many hail from rural
Mexico -- casualties, critics say, of a trade deal that pitted highly
subsidized U.S. and Canadian agribusiness against Mexican producers working
tiny plots.
BUT THEN ISN’T D.C.
CONTROLLED BY WALL ST’S ORGANIZED CRIME???
By Xelan Bonn
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Now risen to the level of an insurgent war, the
battle between the falling Kleptocratic Mexican government and supra-wealthy
organized crime groups who now control much of Mexico's land areas, police
forces, and even some of its military has hit a new milestone.
Exasperating political climates, the violence,
bloodshed, and hatred for Americans South of the border, coupled with rising
injustices and racism against and by US citizens, compounded by an incompetent
federal government North of the border, are propagating the fires of civil
discontent on both sides and about to strip-away the last veneers of civility.
ASK YOURSELF WHAT THE DEMS HAVE DONE FOR YOU,
THEN COMPARE IT TO WHAT THEY’VE DONE FOR LA RAZA!!! DEMS ARE THE PARTY of
ILLEGALS!
Toss into the ugly political salad the mix of
illegal immigration, free trade, high treason, disdain for the Constitution
by US leaders, anti-rule-of-law anarchists groups and members of Congress (i.e.
pro-open borders, pro-illegal immigration groups), and increasing economic
pressures and uncertainties on both sides of the border, the climate is now
ripe for growing a civil war.
Corrupted Mexican officials are driving an
ever-increasing political wedge against Americans, demanding non-existent
rights for millions of their invading hordes in direct violation of the Treaty
of Guadalupe--giving the US the unilateral legal right to militarily invade
Mexico and seize its oil fields and other natural assets. However, at the
highest level of government, both countries remain safe from such political
unthinkables--but then the choice as to whether the US goes to war with Mexico
is not in either government's hands.
Somewhere, anywhere, perhaps along any stretch
of the border where Mexican militants are becoming extremely aggressive, or
within any US city where illegal aliens have coalesced, a violent event is now
likely to unfold that could trigger a powerful domino effect, bringing both
countries to war with lightening speed--citizen national against citizen
national!
Along the borders, many patriotic Americans are
often working side by side to prop up a greatly understaffed Border Patrol, as
well as aid what many pundits claim is an incompetent, bureaucratically
quagmired Department of Homeland Security. Such private groups, uncensored
by government regulations, are now reporting that aggressive actions by both
armed and unarmed Mexican citizens, coupled with high tensions on both sides of
the border, are threatening to erupt into full-scale war--a war that neither
government will be able to quell once ignited, they suggest. [1]
Gun fights between Mexicans and Americans on the
borders are not unusual and many Border Patrol agents have lost their lives
while others have been used, and even jailed, as international political fodder
in a fight fraught with political and economic complexities and racial and
nationalistic tensions.
Hatred is now growing on all sides of the issues
and fences.
"The Brown Berets de Aztlan [in the US]
have undertaken an
active campaign to recruit more soldiers and form new
chapters throughout Aztlan," said Chairman David Rico this
month. (Aztlan
is defined by this group as Southwest United
States and parts of Mexico--to be
a new country ruled by
militant Mestizos--i.e. Mexicans).[3]
Making matters worse is the fact that Mexican
human and
drug smugglers have hired gang members, such as the
international
Mara Salvatrucha street gang, to kill U.S. Border
Patrol agents.[4]
Across the country in cities like Los Angeles and
Chicago, Latino gangs made-up of largely illegal aliens, are routinely
practicing race-based murder against Whites and Blacks. [5]
YOUR LA RAZA DEMS AT WORK… for illegals!
Even members of Congress have splintered into
race-biased groups, such as the Hispanic Caucus lead by Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a
known anti-rule-of-law proponent of illegal immigration and original signatory
to the unconstitutional Kennedy/McCain "comprehensive amnesty" bill
proposal expected to cost taxpayers an estimated $7 to $36 trillion dollars
over 30-years if approved. [5.2] (He is not alone in his disdain for the
Constitution and law or anti-Americanisms, given Democratic House Majority
Leader Nancy Pelosi's blocking of all progress on the SAVE Act, which would
markedly end illegal immigration by forcing criminal employers to quit hiring
illegal aliens).
[PUA Note: Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid have both refused to support the Safe America Act,
which would seal our borders within 6 months and repatriate all illegal aliens
within 16 months, permanently ending illegal immigration, and more--its the
bill proposal of its kind that would actually save taxpayers trillions of
dollars and help reduce the national debt while increasing security for all
Americans.]
In the mean time, White and Black supremacist
groups have remained largely benign, showing little retaliation against illegal
alien Latino gangs to date, which could be a sign of a dangerous smoldering
time bomb looking for an excuse to explode.
Activist groups, as well as state law makers,
are routinely pointing out that the federal government has breeched its
Constitutionally required duty under Article IV, Section IV to protect citizens
and states from foreign invasion, instead choosing to play politics with the
law and mislabeling the invasion (of an estimated 11-16 million armed and
unarmed Mexican citizens and another 4-8 million nonMexicans) as merely
unfortunate--ignoring the $300+ billion yearly impact on local and state
governments and landslide of negative impacts on Americans.[6]
Each year, foreign invaders murder an estimated
4,380 Americans in their undeclared war on Americans, a death toll totaling
more than the 5 years of war in Iraq combined. [7] Compounding the impacts,
another 4,735 innocent Americans are slaughtered by illegal alien drunk drivers
who should not be in the country at all but are allowed to remain by local,
state, and federal law enforcement. [sic] Equally sickening is the fact that
over 243 innocent children are brutally molested or raped each month by foreign
intruders--tragic crimes that could have been avoided by simply enforcing our
immigration laws--clearly Pelosi and Gutierrez stand against American children,
given their Draconian positions and respective outcroppings. [sic]
Many journalist and researchers now conclude that
President Bush and Congress have raised their collective incompetency to the
level of criminal negligence, and even treason, for failing to deal with these
issues as required by law and Constitution.[8] Criticism, legal, and political
issues aside in the US, the war South of the border continues to escalate and
threaten the US.
A United Nations survey of security and
criminalization of 38 countries ranked Mexico "number one" in the
category of "violent crime" in the use of firearms--a country where
privately owned guns are largely illegal--much to the detriment of its
defenseless citizens.[9]
In the state of Sinaloa, unarmed and unprotected
families have locked themselves inside their homes in fear of being gunned down
by pervasive local drug cartels who have killed over 46 Mexicans so far this
month.[10] State and federal leaders have gathered in secret locations in a
desperate attempt to figure out how to retake control. [11]
Organized crime, which collectively earns an
estimated $23 to $40+ billion annually from the illegal drug and human
trafficking markets in the US, are growing bolder throughout Mexico and using
their funding to corrupt anything and everything that stands in their way. They
have hit an all-time high in both infiltration of government, as well as murder
of prominent families, police, and army officials--racking up 102 executions
nationally in just the last seven days.[12] Mexican armies are now spread thin,
trying to quell the violence and warfare across one third of its territories
but are losing ground--government leaders are highly alarmed. [13]
The raging war in Mexico has gotten so bad that
three high ranking federal officers resigned their posts and asked the US
government for "political asylum" last month.[13.2] The obvious
implication is that the Mexican government can no longer protect its own and is
now being seen as a political threat to upstanding citizens--such is the infiltration
and corruption level within government by organized crime that now appears to
be running much of the government (for all intents and purposes).
In the city of Tijuana, Wild West style shoot-outs
on city streets have become common place between the forces of good and evil,
with evil largely winning with impunity. A major cash cow for Mexican
mafias, kidnapping along the border areas of both American and Mexican citizens
has escalated to such a point that mayors of cities from Tijuana to Juarez have
requested help from the Mexican Secretary of Government. [sic]
Even the US has entertained the idea of sending a
billion dollar stipend to Mexico's deep dark financial hole (where so much
money is known to mysteriously disappear). [14] Ironically, given the state of
the Mexican government's corruption at all levels, such funds may ultimately
end up in the hands of the very organized crime groups it was meant to
fight--imagine Americans funding their own foe and demise!
THE NAFTA CONSPIRACY TO SURRENDER
AMERICA'S BORDER FOR BIGGER CORPORAT PROFITS.
Fueling the war fires by showing their lack of
concern for opening
the deadly Pandor'a Box onto American society,
President Bush,
Mexican President Calderon, and Canadian Prime
Minister Harper
are pressing forward aggressive plans to
permanently open the
border with Mexico to the US in advancement
of their free trade
agenda under the Security and Prosperity
Partnership (SPP). The
SPP, according to many research analyst,
journalist, state
legislators and other officials, has been deemed
the precursor to the
North American Union (NAU). The goal, they claim,
is to
eventually combine the US, Canada, and Mexico into
one country
under one currency--the "Amero"-- much
like the European Union.
It is a claim the three leaders flatly deny, but
their actions, and
those of all three governments, dictate the plan is
well underway.[15]
The result has been that state legislators, like
Arizona's State Senator Karen Johnson, have taken bold steps to stop the NAU
and have threatened to secede their states from the union in the event
unconstitutional mandates such as the SPP are attempted by the federal
government. [16] Twelve states have some form of anti-SPP/NAU laws either
secured or in the works. [17]
Citizens across the US are awakening to the facts
with much anger and bitterness, pointing hatful fingers at both federal leaders
and millions of unwanted foreign invaders stealing their resources and
opportunities.
Compounding problems, Mexico's government has
proven itself equally incompetent.
Admitting its own abuse of immigrants coming to
Mexico from
its South, the Mexican oligarchy of
super-wealthy families who
puppet-master the Congress and President, have
perennially
proven themselves unwilling and unable to deal
with their own
country's economic and immigration problems, or
its endemic
corruption. Their last resort agenda for
their own failures has
been to push their citizens out of Mexico and
into the US
toward keeping their economy from
collapsing--using the ploy
of blaming the US for criminalizing the trespass
of its borders
while crying racism--even though Mexico is
comprised of many
races and ethnicities--counting on the ignorance
and assistance
of the national mainstream new media in the US
to swallow the
bait and promote its smoke-screen rhetoric. [18]
Mexico will become one of the main expellers of
its countrymen because of the high degree of violence and insecurity, according
to Marion Hoffmann, regional representative of the U.N. High Commissioner for
Refugees in the Distrito Federal.[19]
Then there are, of course, the drug and human
trafficking wars still raging on and threatening the US in too many ways.
Mexican border cities everywhere can be exampled by
Juarez where deadly violence has become a mainstay and is spilling across into
the US with tragic consequences--that city alone reported 31 dead for the first
twelve days of May.
Characterized as " very
dangerous"..."potentially deadly" by Rob Daniels of Border
Patrol, Mexican gunmen stormed an armed National Guard unit in Arizona between
Lukeville and Nogales showing their disdain for the US and its security
measures. [20]
"There has been an over-100 percent
increase in
the last fiscal year in border violence aimed
at
our Border Patrol agents, and that ranges
from
gunshots fired across the border to rocks
being
thrown, sometimes flaming rocks," said
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.
[21]
Mexicans have heavily armed themselves and are
increasingly prepared to use force to ensure their continued US invasion via
both drug and human trafficking.[22]
"They've got weapons, high-tech radios,
computers, cell phones, Global Positioning Systems, spotters and can react
faster than we are able to," said Shawn P. Moran, a 10-year U.S. Border
Patrol veteran who serves as vice president of the National Border Patrol Council
Local 1613 in San Diego. [sic]
"And they have no hesitancy to attack the
agents on the line, with anything from assault rifles and improvised Molotov
cocktails to rocks, concrete slabs and bottles," he said. "There are
so many agent 'rockings' that few are even reported anymore. If we wrote them
all up, that's all we would be doing," he said. [sic]
BLOG COMMENT:
NEARLY HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN
GANGS. MORE THAN 2,000 (DATED) CALIFORNIANS
HAVE BEEN MURDERED BY MEXCIANS THAT FLED
BACK OVER THE BORDER TO AVOID PROSECUTION.
TEXAS HAS HAD MORE THAN 3,000 AMERICANS
MURDERED BY INVADING MEXICANS!
In Arizona and California, Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) scratched the
surface of criminal overspill into the
US from
Mexico when they raided two dwellings to save
over a hundred illegal
alien kidnapped victims
being held hostage by Mexican organized
crime. [22.1]
crime. [22.1]
The political artifice that unsecured borders and
immigration is merely a minor issue unworthy of solving by US leaders contrasts
the hard reality that we are now engaged in a low level war with Mexico--a war
that could escalate at any moment.
Compounding the violent aspects are the racist
aspects from both camps, on both sides of the border.
In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the
vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans.
[22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism,
yet in denial, having never endured the social
development of a Civil Rights movement like in
the US--Blacks are harshly treated while foreign
Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact,
racism as workplace discrimination can be seen
across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino
works--the vast majority of the workforce is
usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites,
Asians, and others. [22.4] This has not gone
unnoticed by US citizen workers.
In the US, growing worker frustration from wage
devaluation and job losses due to illegal immigration and free trade, as well
as a faltering economy is spurring increased intolerance for both illegal
aliens and those in the Hispanic communities who are increasingly seen as
co-conspirators for their failure to speak-out loud and clear against the
foreign invasion. Hate crimes have been on a steady increase since 2005 with
7,722 reported in 2007 alone (the majority race-based), according to the FBI.
[23]
Raising its ugly head in 2002 and making a recent
comeback, the Flash video game known as Border Patrol is again
increasing its popularity across the US on the Net. In what is seen as racist
or hate-mongering content, the video features the US-Mexican border and illegal
aliens trying to cross--points are scored for killing illegal aliens.
Such social trends tend to show increasing
frustrations and underlying anger of US citizens that is fueling an
undercurrent mix of nationalism and racial tensions between Americans and
Mexicans in particular. [24]
Adding unwanted fuel to race tensions is the
mainstream news media's insistence on not reporting the facts on illegal
immigration or the dangers of open borders while focusing on the agendas and
rhetoric of race-based groups. For example, pro illegal
immigration activist Alfredo Gutierrez, an
alleged Latino racist, revealed the group's
agenda and strategy that is still in use to this
day.
“We call things racism just to get attention.
We
reduce complicated problems to racism, not
because it is racism, but because it works.”
[25]
Such statements have been turned into a mainstream
news media platform, which has been consistently brought forward in the press
and is actually racist in and of itself--for it promotes the race-based agenda
of those who support illegal immigration, which devalues fact exploration,
rule-of-law, Constitutional respect, and logical conclusions surrounding highly
complex issues that are severely and negatively impacting Americans--and now
skewing both camps toward a war footing.
The sad irony is that illegal aliens come in all
races and ethnicities, including Euro-whites, so while race clearly plays a
role on both sides of the issue toward fueling hatred in both camps, race
itself in not the central issue--not by a long shot.
This administration and this Congress are and
will be responsible for the deaths of thousands of our citizens for their
failure to secure our borders and they should be held [legally] accountable,
said Lou Dobbs, of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight. [26]
If anything is clear from these trends and
developments, it is that Congress's dereliction of duty to ensure the
enforcement of our current laws, and the President's preoccupation with his
treasonous SPP project that is undermining trust in government and fueling
nationalism, are two major underlying weights pressuring a frustrated citizenry
toward a predilection for violence that has, as yet, remained well constrained.
For there are two camps of citizens in America--those who clearly see the
threats and are ready to fight for their country--and those who have kept their
heads in the sands and are ready to run away from their country--the former
will likely do all the deciding for the latter.
The issue, although clearly not about race at its
roots, is quickly becoming a political wildfire about race and nationalism due
to the rudderless and incompetent national leadership of two countries whose
failed policies and lack of solution-making on behalf of their citizens, is
outcropping us all toward yet another preventable catastrophe. Citizens are
being forced to the solve the problems government refuses to deal with, and as
we all know, that's when things go to hell.
Americans will never tolerate an open border
with Mexico and they want control of their country, immigration, borders, and
security returned to them, while Mexico's citizens will likely tire of living
in fear in their own land--they will, at some point, as in their historical
past, rise up to take matters into their own hands. We could very well be in
the midst of the starting stages of the next Mexican Revolution where both
mafias and governments may soon learn to fear the people--but it's a civil war
more likely than not to ignite first on American soil--where one stupid act
mislabeled as "racism" by one side or the other, could trigger it all.
One thing is certain for both country's
citizens--they each deserve better from their government and leaders--and they
each deserve a country that works!
Xelan Bonn is founder of the Patriot Union of
America, a nonpartisan, nonprofit citizen's advocacy. Learn more at www.patriotunion.org
******************
References
[1] Borders, movie 5-11-08
(http://www.bordermovie.com/), and field reports from Cochise County Militia
(on file with PUA)
[3] Aztlan Net 5-1-08 (Brown Berets de Aztlan
are recruiting and forming new chapters)
[4] Daily Bulletin 1-10-06 (Border Agents Unaware
Of Gang Death Threat)
[5] Patriot Union of America 12-7-07 (Operation
Safe America report)
[5.2] PUA 9-27-07 (Could "Amnesty"
Bankrupt US Economy?)
[6] Wooldridge/Patriot Union of America 4-12-08
(Enormous Cost Of Illegal Immigration: Criminal Aliens)
[7] World Net Daily 11-28-06 (Illegal Aliens
Murder 12 Americans Daily)
[8] CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, 5-12-08 (Lou's
Commentary), and various article quotes found in the PUA Website.
[9] El Imparcial (Hermosillo, Sonora) 4/23/08
[10] El Universal, Mexico City 5-11-08
[11] El Universal, Mexico City 5-11-08, El Debate,
Culiacan, Sinaloa 5-11-08
[12] La Jornada (Mexico City) 5/10/08
[13] New York Post 8-9-07 (Narco
Insurrection: mexico's Own Terror War)
[13.2] CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight 5-14-08
[14] Stop The Drug War Newsletter 1026-07 (Bush
Reveals Plan Mexico, Proposes $1.4 Billion Anti-Drug Aid Package)
[15] Patriot Union Of America 4-22-08 (For
The 110th Congress)
[16] East Valley Tribune 11-29-06 (Johnson
See US Mexico Plot)
[17] Lou Dobbs Tonight 4-6-08 ( 12 States
Fight Bush's North American Union And the Dismantling Of Democracy )
[18] La Jornada (Mexico City) 4/30/08
[19] Diario Xalapa (Xalapa, Veracruz) 5/1/08
[20] Arizona Nightly News 5-21-07
[21] Reuters, 2-10-06, Prison Planet 5-12-08,
Christian Science Monitor 2-15-06
[22] Washington Times, 11-14-07 (Border Violence
Rising Against Authorities)
[22.1] CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight 5-15-08
[22.2] Zogby poll 1-2-08 (Mexicans Hate
Americans)
[22.3] New York Times 5-15-08 (Racism: Mexico
In Denial)
[[22.4] I.E.-- Swift plant raids, fast food
restaurant chains across Southwest, majority of construction work sites, etc.
[23] FBI Crimes Statistics 11-19-07 (Hate
Crimes In The US)
[24] ABC News, 5-1-06 (Racist Video Game Incites
Anger)
[25] Phoenix Gazette, 3-14-1992
[26] CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, 5-12-08
Additional References
[A] El Diario (Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua) 5/10/08,
Norte (Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua 5/12/08
[B} The Conservative Voice 5-4-08 (Mexico's
Racism Against Gringos)
[C] Patriot Society 12-7-07 (Operation Safe
America)
TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED, ONLY ILLEGALS GET JOBS IN AMERICA!
Report shows continuing stagnation in US jobs, wages
By Tom Hall
8 August 2015
The latest jobs report by the US Labor Department has been the subject of mild praise in the corporate media, which has portrayed the figures as an indicator of a slow but steady recovery in the American labor market.
As with previous reports, however, the anemic figures released on Friday actually demonstrate that American workers face continuing economic stagnation.
The economy added only 215,000 new jobs in July, slightly below analysts’ already low expectations. Through the first half of the year, the job market is on pace to grow at a much lower rate than last year, which averaged 246,000 jobs a month.
The added jobs were not enough to affect the
official unemployment rate of 5.3 percent.
However, it is widely acknowledged that the
official unemployment rate is largely
fictitious, with the head of the Gallup polling
agency going so far as to call it a “Big Lie”
earlier this year.
fictitious, with the head of the Gallup polling
agency going so far as to call it a “Big Lie”
earlier this year.
The Economic Policy Institute, a Washington think tank, estimated that there were around 3.4 million “missing workers” last month, defined as those who would be looking for work if the job market were better. If these workers are included, the unemployment rate would rise to 7.3 percent. In addition, a large number of people are still underemployed. Some 6.3 million people were classified as “involuntary part-time workers” in July, meaning they worked part-time because they were unable to find full-time jobs.
The main factor in the fall in the unemployment rate is not a growing job market, but a falling labor force participation rate—a measure of the percentage of the population that is actively seeking employment. This remained constant at 62.6 percent in July, its lowest level since 1977. Particularly pronounced is the fall in labor force participation among those in the prime of their working career.
According to the EPI, the employment-population ratio for people aged 25-54 was only 77.1 percent in July. This figure has stagnated or declined since the beginning of the year, following years of extremely slow growth. During the the early 1990s and 2000s, the employment-population ratio for 25-54 year-olds never dropped below 78.1 percent.
The number of people in long-term unemployment, defined as the percentage of the population that has been out of work for 27 weeks or more, remained constant at 2.2 million people in July, or 26.9 percent of all unemployed.
The jobs situation facing young people is especially bleak. The labor force participation for teenagers was only 41.3 percent in July, the lowest level in the post-war period. The official unemployment rate for teenagers was a staggering 16.2 percent.
A defining feature of the American economy seven years after the 2008 collapse is the prevalence of low-wage jobs. Wages grew by only 0.2 percent last month, according to the report. This follows on the heels of a previous report by the Labor Department that found that employment costs in the second quarter of the year rose by only 0.2 percent, the lowest quarterly rise since 1982. Over the past year, wages have only risen by 2.1 percent, barely enough to keep up with inflation.
The increase in employment in July skewed toward the retail industry, which added 36,000 jobs. The median hourly wage for retail salespeople in July was a poverty-level $10.29.
Significantly, the Labor Department statistics show a decline in employment in the mining sector of 5,000 jobs, reflecting a wave of layoffs and bankruptcies due to a collapse in the price of coal and of commodity prices. Last month, the world's fifth-largest mining conglomerate, Anglo American, announced that it would cut 53,000 jobs worldwide in the near future.
What is revealed in these monthly figures is the restructuring of class relations in the United States after the 2008 recession. The economic recovery that officially began in 2009, far from leading to any benefits for American workers, has been largely predicated upon their impoverishment. What remains of the social and economic gains made by American workers after World War II are being systematically dismantled, and the United States converted into a low-wage platform.
Friday’s report was considered especially significant because of its implications for the Federal Reserve’s widely-expected decision to begin raising interest rates sometime later this year. Although the report was slightly below analysts’ expectations, it spooked investors worried by the prospect of the Federal Reserve beginning to turn down the spigot of virtually free money.
This caused a brief sell-off throughout the middle of the day on the stock market. At one point, the Down Jones Industrial Average was down by more than 135 points, before closing the day down by 46 points, the seventh day in a row the index had fallen.
The Federal Reserve’s near-zero interest rate policy, far from fueling new investment in productive capital, has encouraged an orgy of the sort of financial speculation by Wall Street firms that produced the 2008 financial crisis in the first place. This is expressed in the boom in share values on the stock market, which have almost tripled since 2009, even as the real economy has stagnated.
SINCE 2000 ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS
AMERICA the failed Nation that Invited Mexico to Invade and loot and then Handed Amnesty to 40 Million Invaders
LAURA INGRAHAM:
The solution to Mexico’s invasion, occupation and ever expanding welfare state in American borders.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/07/laura-ingraham-what-politicians-will.html
AMERICA: NO LEGAL NEED APPLY
…. but we still get the tax bills for Mexico’s welfare state in our open borders!
HERE COME THE OBAMA LA RAZA HORDES…..
“They are in the process of hiring 1,000 full-time staff to quickly approve applications for the president’s illegal amnesty, which will provide work permits, photo IDs, Social Security and Medicare to illegal immigrants — all benefits rejected by Congress,” Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said earlier this month. “This action will mean that American workers, their sons, their daughters, their parents, will now have to compete directly for jobs, wages, and benefits with millions of illegal immigrants.”
SEN. RICK SANTORUM:
“Part of the problem, Santorum said, has been the arrival of millions of unskilled immigrants — legal and illegal — in the United States."American workers deserve a shot at [good] jobs," Santorum said. "Over the last 20 years, we have brought into this country, legally and illegally, 35 MILLION mostly unskilled workers. And the result, over that same period of time, workers' wages and family incomes have flatlined." SEN. RICK SANTORUM
SINCE 2000 ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS
AMERICA the failed Nation that Invited Mexico to Invade and loot and then Handed Amnesty to 40 Million Invaders
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS, WHILE THE GOP WATCHED, TURNED AMERICAN INTO MEXICO’S JOBS, WELFARE AND DRUG MARKET.
“The percentage of foreign-born workers in the U.S. labor force has more than tripled over the last four decades and while the U.S. represents just 5 percent of the world’s population it attracts 20 percent of the world’s immigrants, according to a new report.”
SEN. JEFF SESSIONS (R)
“No party can win without working and middle class voters. The path forward for the GOP is to become the party of the American worker. The party of higher wages. The party of full employment.
The Democratic Party has already cast its lot: its members have endlessly enabled the President’s anti-worker policies, including his wage-cutting agenda of uncontrolled immigration and the bleeding of American manufacturing wealth overseas.”
OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA WITH NARCOMEX:
Sarah Saldaña, who will head Immigration and Customs and Enforcement (ICE). She will be the first Hispanic woman to lead the agency.
“She will continue the pattern of lawlessness perpetuated by the president and the political leadership at the Department of Homeland Security,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said. Congress cannot and must not confirm anyone to lead an agency in DHS or other law enforcement agency who supports executive amnesty.”
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining
control is not even a goal of the department.
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining
control is not even a goal of the department.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/03/sen-john-mcamnesty-mccain-and-la-raza.html
Download a PDF of this Backgrounder
Steven A. Camarota is the Director of Research and Karen Zeigler is a demographer at the Center for Immigration Studies.
Government data collected in December 2014 show 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the United States who arrived in January 2000 or later. But only 9.3 million jobs were added over this time period. In addition, the native-born population 16 and older grew by 25.2 million. Because job growth has not come close to matching immigration and population growth, the share of Americans in the labor force has declined dramatically — a clear indication there is no labor shortage. Despite this, Congress is considering proposals to increase legal immigration even further; and during the last Congress the Senate actually passed the Schumer-Rubio bill (S.744), which would have doubled legal immigration and legalized illegal immigrants.1 Congress's disregard for the absorption capacity of the U.S. labor market has profound consequences for American workers.
The key question for policymakers is whether it makes sense to allow in this number of legal immigrants and tolerate this level of illegal immigration when long-term job growth has not come close to matching these numbers. Moreover, this record immigration has occurred at a time when job growth has not even kept pace with natural population increase, let alone new immigration. Unfortunately, policy-makers have given little though to the adsorption capacity of the U.S. labor market when formulating immigration policy."
Of course, the argument is often made that immigrants create more jobs than they take. The last 14 years are a good test of that argument. Since 2000, 18 million immigrants have arrived, yet job growth has been very weak despite record immigration. In fact, the number of immigrants that arrived was about twice the number of new jobs. While employment rises and falls with the economy and temporary changes in the business cycle matter little when considering a big policy question like immigration, when we examine long-term trends we find that the level of immigration (mostly legal) and natural population increase have completely swamped job growth. As a result, there has been a long-term decline in the labor force participation rate of working-age (16 to 65) natives. This is certainly not the long-term pattern we would expect if immigration is the boon to native employment that so many immigration advocates argue.
Data Source. The arrival data, population growth figures, labor force participation, and employment rates reported in this analysis all come from the public-use files of the Current Population Survey (CPS) collected by the Census Bureau and analyzed each month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). We focus on the December 2014 data and prior Decembers for comparison to control for seasonality.10 The growth in the number of jobs reported here comes directly from the BLS website. The BLS measures the number of jobs using what is officially known as the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey, more often referred to as the "establishment survey".11
End Notes
1 Congressional Budget Office projections indicate that if the Schumer-Rubio bill (S.744) had become law, the number of new legal immigrants allowed into the country would have roughly doubled to 20 million over the next decade, adding to the 42 million immigrants (legal and illegal) already here. A Congressional Budget Office cost estimate (Table 2, p. 14), reports that by 2023 there would have been 10.4 million additional U.S. residents if the bill had passed, including 1.2 million U.S.-born children of new immigrants. This increase is in addition to the legalization of illegal immigrants already in the country. The primary argument for this dramatic increase is, as Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) has argued, that without it the country faces "labor shortages". The National Restaurant Association, National Association of Home Builders, National Association of Manufacturers, Business Roundtable, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and numerous other companies and business associations have all argued that immigration should be increased because there are not enough workers in the country, both skilled and unskilled.
2 The Current Population Survey (CPS) collected by the Census Bureau and analyzed each month by the Bureau of Labor Statics includes a question asking immigrants when they came to the United States. In December 2014, 18 million immigrants, referred to as the foreign-born by the Census Bureau, indicated that they had come to America in 2000 or later. Of these post-2000 arrivals, 9.97 million were employed. The number of new arrivals is almost certainly larger than 18 million for several reasons: First, the monthly CPS generally undercounts new arrivals relative to other Census surveys. For example, the most recent data available from the much larger American Community Survey (ACS) show about 600,000 more arrivals compared to the July 2013 monthly CPS. (The ACS is controlled to a July 1 total so it is necessary to compare it to the CPS from July.) This indicates that there is about a 4 percent undercount in the monthly CPS compared to the ACS in the number of recent arrivals. Second, even though the ACS captures a slightly larger share of the foreign-born compared to the monthly CPS, the Department of Homeland Security still estimates that the ACS undercounts the post-1980 immigrant population (legal and illegal) by 5.4 percent. See Table 2 (p. 4) in "Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2012", Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics, March 2013. So the actual number of new arrivals 2000 to 2014 is almost certainly closer to 20 million. It is also the case that the 18 million figure does not represent the growth in the immigrant population, but rather the number of new arrivals. New arrivals are offset by deaths and return migration. Comparing the January 2000 CPS to the December 2014 CPS shows a net growth in the immigrant population of 12 million. The total immigrant population grew by 12 million and not 18 million because some six million immigrants (roughly 430,000 annually) already here in 2000 had died or had returned to their home countries by 2014, so the net growth in this population was 12 million. This is only a rough estimate of deaths and return migration, and is based on the raw data provided by the Cen¬sus Bureau; no adjustments have been made for breaks in the continuity of the CPS from 2000 to 2014.
3 The Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys employers using the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey. The CES asks employers each month about the number of employees they have. This table at the BLS website shows the number of jobs in the United States based on that survey. One simply needs to select the years desired. It is also possible to use the CPS rather than the CES to measure employment growth (number of people working) rather than job growth. The BLS explains the differences between the two sources here.
4 Of all new arrivals, 10 million or 55 percent were working in December 2014. The latest estimates of the illegal immigrant population from the Department of Homeland Security show that, of the total illegal population of 11.4 million in January 2012, 4.8 million had entered the country from 2000 to 2011 (see Table 1 in "Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2012"). DHS also estimated 1.54 million new arrivals from 2005 to the end of 2011, or about 220,000 on average annually. Extrapolating out these numbers through the end of 2014 would mean 5.46 million illegal immigrants in the country in 2014 who arrived from 2000 to 2014. The actual number would be lower because some of the 4.8 million post-2000 illegal immigrants in the country in January 2012 would have died, returned home, or gained legal status by the end of 2014. Also the 4.8 million figure is adjusted upward by 10 percent relative to the Census Bureau data on which it is based to reflect what DHS believes is the undercount of illegal immigrants in the data. The CPS data used here for employment and new arrivals have not been adjusted. Nonetheless, these numbers allow us to roughly estimate that illegal immigrants accounted for between one-quarter and one third of the 18 million arrivals. The Pew Hispanic Center's most recent estimates of illegal immigrants through 2012 show 4.55 million illegal immigrants (40.6 percent of the total) who have been in the country for less than 10 years. Unfortunately, Pew does not provide the number who have come since 2000, as does DHS. However, they do estimate that in 2012 there were 1.85 million illegal immigrants who had arrived in the country in the five years prior to 2012. Assuming that illegal immigration continued at that level in 2013 and 2014, there would be five to six million post-2000 illegal immigrants in the country by the end of 2014. Again, this would mean that between one-fourth and one-third of the 18 million arrivals in the December 2014 CPS were illegal immigrants. See Table A2 in "As Growth Stalls, Unauthorized Immigrant Population Becomes More Settled", Pew Hispanic Center, 2014.
5 Population growth is based on the January 2000 CPS and the December 2014 CPS.
6 Figures are from the December 2000, 2007, and 2014 CPS. Labor force participation had already started to decline slightly by the end of 2007 as the Great Recession began in the fourth quarter of that year. So a better comparison with December of this year might be the December 2006 CPS, before the Great Recession. In that month, labor force participation was still only 75.1 percent, significantly below the 76.9 percent in December 2000. To see other figures that show the same trends for the first quarter of each year 2000 to 2014, see Figures 6 and 7 in "All Employment Growth Since 2000 Went to Immigrants: Number of U.S.-born not working grew by 17 million", Center for Immigration Studies, 2014.
7 Figures are from the December 2000 and 2014 CPS. The number unemployed (share looking for work) is also higher now than in 2000.
8 As with all other data in this report, arrival data are from the December 2014 CPS and job growth is from the BLS website.
9 Figures are from the December 2007 public-use file of the Current Population Survey. The December 2014 CPS shows 10.2 million people living in the country who indicated that they arrived from 2000 to 2007. The difference partly reflects sampling variability and changes in survey weighting. The lower number in December 2014 represents deaths and out-migration of the 2000-2007 cohort by December 2014.
10 The labor force participation rates reported in Figure 1 are seasonally unadjusted.
11 The CES asks employers each month about the number of employees they have. This table at the BLS website provides the number of jobs in the United States based on that survey. One simply needs to select the years desired. The CES covers non-farm jobs. The exclusion of the farm sector has no meaningful impact on this analysis because it is only a tiny share of U.S. employment. The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that all farm and agriculture service workers made up "less than 1 percent of all U.S. wage and salary workers" in 2012. They also reported that farm employment was actually slightly lower in 2012 compared to 2000. So if these workers were included in the CES it would mean that immigration outpaced job growth by an even wider margin. Finally, job growth in this report is focused on January 2000 and December 2014 and farm employment is lowest in the winter months. See the USDA website.
JEFF SESSIONS on the OBAMA ASSAULT on the AMERICAN (Legal) WORKER:
“The President is providing an estimated 5 million illegal immigrants with social security numbers, photo IDs, and work permits—allowing them to now take jobs directly from struggling Americans during a time of record immigration, low wages, and high joblessness.”
“The President’s plan also calls for boosting foreign worker programs for IT companies that experts tell us displace U.S. workers and keep wages low,” Sessions said. “The President’s unconstitutional action is a direct threat to our Republican system of government and will have catastrophic consequences for the American people. It must be stopped. And the way to stop it is by using Congress’ power of the purse.”
For Every New Job, Two New Immigrants
Since 2000: 9.3 million new jobs, 18 million new immigrants
Steven A. Camarota is the Director of Research and Karen Zeigler is a demographer at the Center for Immigration Studies.
- In December 2014 there were 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the country who had arrived since January 2000.2 But job growth over this period was just 9.3 million — half of new immigration.3
- Between two-thirds and three-fourths of the new arrivals are estimated to be legal immigrants.4 Of the new arrivals 89 percent were potential workers 16 and older.
- In addition to the 18 million new immigrants, the native-born working-age population (ages 16 to 65) grew by 16.5 million since 2000; if we count natives over age 65, total native population growth was 25.2 million since 2000.5
- Job growth has not come close to matching new immigration and natural population increase; as a result, the labor force participation rate (the share working or looking for work) of native-born Americans 16 to 65 shows a significant long-term decline.
- The share of native-born Americans 16 to 65 in the labor force was 77 percent in December 2000, 75 percent in December 2007, and 72 percent in December 2014.6
- The number of working-age natives not in the labor force (neither working nor looking for work) increased by 13 million from December 2000 to December 2014.7
- If we look at the period after the Great Recession began, 7.8 million new immigrants arrived from 2008 to 2014, yet net job growth was just two million from the beginning of 2008 to the end of 2014.8
- If we look at the period before the Great Recession, from January 2000 to December 2007, 11.1 million immigrants arrived and job growth was still only 7.3 million.9
The key question for policymakers is whether it makes sense to allow in this number of legal immigrants and tolerate this level of illegal immigration when long-term job growth has not come close to matching these numbers. Moreover, this record immigration has occurred at a time when job growth has not even kept pace with natural population increase, let alone new immigration. Unfortunately, policy-makers have given little though to the adsorption capacity of the U.S. labor market when formulating immigration policy."
Of course, the argument is often made that immigrants create more jobs than they take. The last 14 years are a good test of that argument. Since 2000, 18 million immigrants have arrived, yet job growth has been very weak despite record immigration. In fact, the number of immigrants that arrived was about twice the number of new jobs. While employment rises and falls with the economy and temporary changes in the business cycle matter little when considering a big policy question like immigration, when we examine long-term trends we find that the level of immigration (mostly legal) and natural population increase have completely swamped job growth. As a result, there has been a long-term decline in the labor force participation rate of working-age (16 to 65) natives. This is certainly not the long-term pattern we would expect if immigration is the boon to native employment that so many immigration advocates argue.
Data Source. The arrival data, population growth figures, labor force participation, and employment rates reported in this analysis all come from the public-use files of the Current Population Survey (CPS) collected by the Census Bureau and analyzed each month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). We focus on the December 2014 data and prior Decembers for comparison to control for seasonality.10 The growth in the number of jobs reported here comes directly from the BLS website. The BLS measures the number of jobs using what is officially known as the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey, more often referred to as the "establishment survey".11
End Notes
1 Congressional Budget Office projections indicate that if the Schumer-Rubio bill (S.744) had become law, the number of new legal immigrants allowed into the country would have roughly doubled to 20 million over the next decade, adding to the 42 million immigrants (legal and illegal) already here. A Congressional Budget Office cost estimate (Table 2, p. 14), reports that by 2023 there would have been 10.4 million additional U.S. residents if the bill had passed, including 1.2 million U.S.-born children of new immigrants. This increase is in addition to the legalization of illegal immigrants already in the country. The primary argument for this dramatic increase is, as Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) has argued, that without it the country faces "labor shortages". The National Restaurant Association, National Association of Home Builders, National Association of Manufacturers, Business Roundtable, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and numerous other companies and business associations have all argued that immigration should be increased because there are not enough workers in the country, both skilled and unskilled.
2 The Current Population Survey (CPS) collected by the Census Bureau and analyzed each month by the Bureau of Labor Statics includes a question asking immigrants when they came to the United States. In December 2014, 18 million immigrants, referred to as the foreign-born by the Census Bureau, indicated that they had come to America in 2000 or later. Of these post-2000 arrivals, 9.97 million were employed. The number of new arrivals is almost certainly larger than 18 million for several reasons: First, the monthly CPS generally undercounts new arrivals relative to other Census surveys. For example, the most recent data available from the much larger American Community Survey (ACS) show about 600,000 more arrivals compared to the July 2013 monthly CPS. (The ACS is controlled to a July 1 total so it is necessary to compare it to the CPS from July.) This indicates that there is about a 4 percent undercount in the monthly CPS compared to the ACS in the number of recent arrivals. Second, even though the ACS captures a slightly larger share of the foreign-born compared to the monthly CPS, the Department of Homeland Security still estimates that the ACS undercounts the post-1980 immigrant population (legal and illegal) by 5.4 percent. See Table 2 (p. 4) in "Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2012", Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics, March 2013. So the actual number of new arrivals 2000 to 2014 is almost certainly closer to 20 million. It is also the case that the 18 million figure does not represent the growth in the immigrant population, but rather the number of new arrivals. New arrivals are offset by deaths and return migration. Comparing the January 2000 CPS to the December 2014 CPS shows a net growth in the immigrant population of 12 million. The total immigrant population grew by 12 million and not 18 million because some six million immigrants (roughly 430,000 annually) already here in 2000 had died or had returned to their home countries by 2014, so the net growth in this population was 12 million. This is only a rough estimate of deaths and return migration, and is based on the raw data provided by the Cen¬sus Bureau; no adjustments have been made for breaks in the continuity of the CPS from 2000 to 2014.
3 The Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys employers using the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey. The CES asks employers each month about the number of employees they have. This table at the BLS website shows the number of jobs in the United States based on that survey. One simply needs to select the years desired. It is also possible to use the CPS rather than the CES to measure employment growth (number of people working) rather than job growth. The BLS explains the differences between the two sources here.
4 Of all new arrivals, 10 million or 55 percent were working in December 2014. The latest estimates of the illegal immigrant population from the Department of Homeland Security show that, of the total illegal population of 11.4 million in January 2012, 4.8 million had entered the country from 2000 to 2011 (see Table 1 in "Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2012"). DHS also estimated 1.54 million new arrivals from 2005 to the end of 2011, or about 220,000 on average annually. Extrapolating out these numbers through the end of 2014 would mean 5.46 million illegal immigrants in the country in 2014 who arrived from 2000 to 2014. The actual number would be lower because some of the 4.8 million post-2000 illegal immigrants in the country in January 2012 would have died, returned home, or gained legal status by the end of 2014. Also the 4.8 million figure is adjusted upward by 10 percent relative to the Census Bureau data on which it is based to reflect what DHS believes is the undercount of illegal immigrants in the data. The CPS data used here for employment and new arrivals have not been adjusted. Nonetheless, these numbers allow us to roughly estimate that illegal immigrants accounted for between one-quarter and one third of the 18 million arrivals. The Pew Hispanic Center's most recent estimates of illegal immigrants through 2012 show 4.55 million illegal immigrants (40.6 percent of the total) who have been in the country for less than 10 years. Unfortunately, Pew does not provide the number who have come since 2000, as does DHS. However, they do estimate that in 2012 there were 1.85 million illegal immigrants who had arrived in the country in the five years prior to 2012. Assuming that illegal immigration continued at that level in 2013 and 2014, there would be five to six million post-2000 illegal immigrants in the country by the end of 2014. Again, this would mean that between one-fourth and one-third of the 18 million arrivals in the December 2014 CPS were illegal immigrants. See Table A2 in "As Growth Stalls, Unauthorized Immigrant Population Becomes More Settled", Pew Hispanic Center, 2014.
5 Population growth is based on the January 2000 CPS and the December 2014 CPS.
6 Figures are from the December 2000, 2007, and 2014 CPS. Labor force participation had already started to decline slightly by the end of 2007 as the Great Recession began in the fourth quarter of that year. So a better comparison with December of this year might be the December 2006 CPS, before the Great Recession. In that month, labor force participation was still only 75.1 percent, significantly below the 76.9 percent in December 2000. To see other figures that show the same trends for the first quarter of each year 2000 to 2014, see Figures 6 and 7 in "All Employment Growth Since 2000 Went to Immigrants: Number of U.S.-born not working grew by 17 million", Center for Immigration Studies, 2014.
7 Figures are from the December 2000 and 2014 CPS. The number unemployed (share looking for work) is also higher now than in 2000.
8 As with all other data in this report, arrival data are from the December 2014 CPS and job growth is from the BLS website.
9 Figures are from the December 2007 public-use file of the Current Population Survey. The December 2014 CPS shows 10.2 million people living in the country who indicated that they arrived from 2000 to 2007. The difference partly reflects sampling variability and changes in survey weighting. The lower number in December 2014 represents deaths and out-migration of the 2000-2007 cohort by December 2014.
10 The labor force participation rates reported in Figure 1 are seasonally unadjusted.
11 The CES asks employers each month about the number of employees they have. This table at the BLS website provides the number of jobs in the United States based on that survey. One simply needs to select the years desired. The CES covers non-farm jobs. The exclusion of the farm sector has no meaningful impact on this analysis because it is only a tiny share of U.S. employment. The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that all farm and agriculture service workers made up "less than 1 percent of all U.S. wage and salary workers" in 2012. They also reported that farm employment was actually slightly lower in 2012 compared to 2000. So if these workers were included in the CES it would mean that immigration outpaced job growth by an even wider margin. Finally, job growth in this report is focused on January 2000 and December 2014 and farm employment is lowest in the winter months. See the USDA website.
No comments:
Post a Comment