BLACK AMERICA. HE WAS TOO BUSH SABOTAGING
AMERICAN BORDERS, LAWS AND INSTITUTIONS FOR HIS
PARTY BASE, THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
"The Race", WHICH OBAMA FUNDED WITH AMERICAN
TAX DOLLARS AND OPERATED OUT OF THE WHITE
HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA V.P. CECILIA MUNOZ.
Now that he’s gone from the White House (forever, one hopes), it is time to ascertain when Barack Obama became an overt black racist. Some will opine that he always has been, which may be true, but is less important than the racial divisi...
March 3, 2017
When Did Barack Obama Become an Overt Black Racist?
Now that he’s gone from the White House (forever, one hopes), it is time to ascertain when Barack Obama became an overt black racist. Some will opine that he always has been, which may be true, but is less important than the racial divisiveness that occurred on the national scene between 2009 and 2017. I shall eschew commenting on his record as a youth, a community organizer, and an Illinois politico. Let’s stick to his legacy at the national level.
Some say Obama’s dislike of America undergirds what he did, but anti-white sentiments better explain his behavior, especially after 2012.
The historian in me says it’s too soon to have the perspective needed to make any definitive judgments on this topic. The political scientist in me, on the other hand, says Obama has a record and we need to explore it. Since my ultimate graduate degree is in Political Science, I shall apply that discipline’s standards.
Obama emerged on the national scene with his keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. We begin there.
If you read the transcript of that speech, you’d believe that the Barack Obama of 2004 sincerely believed in America’s unity. Aspiring candidates for national office give lip service to views that will “play in Peoria,” but set that aside. At one point, he told the delegates “[t]here’s not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” He added, “[w]e are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.”
In his only direct reference to race, Obama criticized “the slander that says a black youth with a book is acting white.”
Elected to the U.S. Senate in 2006, Obama was actively seeking the presidency within months. The gist of his campaign in 2007 and 2008, insofar as it related to the race issue, was to be post-racial. As a product of a mixed-race relationship, Obama could not escape the question of race, which was made even more pertinent following revelations of incendiary remarks by his long-time pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Obama tried to defuse the more divisive implications of Wright’s rants in a major address given in mid-March, 2008.
Although his acolytes in the mainstream media (MSM) quickly opined that Obama had defused the issue, a careful reading of that speech suggests otherwise.
Although, at points, Obama seemed to challenge Wright’s belief that racism was endemic and a perpetual feature of American society, he also asserted that the Constitution, even though it contained the principles that would end the institution, “was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery.” He also asserted that he could no more disown Wright than he could either the black community or his white grandmother. Obama stated that blacks and whites “all want to move in the same direction,” but he eventually made clear that America had much to do to perfect that part of its union pertaining to race, presumably because Americans “have never really worked though” racial questions.
Obama also called for black men to take more responsibility for the children they sired in his 2008 Father’s Day speech in Chicago. That speech, however, caused an outcry among some African American spokesmen. Subsequent Father’s Day addresses did not have overt racial connections.
Even after he became Chief Executive, Obama tried to maintain a façade of racial even-handedness, although his nomination of Eric Holder to be Attorney General should have alerted us to potential problems. Almost as soon as Holder became AG, he refused to imprison two New Black Panthers found guilty of voter intimidation in Philadelphia. It wasn’t long before the Obama/Holder-led Department of Justice manifested an unwillingness to prosecute African Americans accused of racially motivated violations of whites’ civil liberties.
A turning-point in Obama’s statements regarding race occurred in mid-July 2009 when, after Cambridge (MA) police arrested Harvard Professor Henry Gates, Obama’s friend, for disorderly conduct, Obama said that, although he did not know all the facts, Cambridge police “acted stupidly” in arresting Gates. Soon thereafter, Obama was forced to hold a “beer summit”between himself, Vice President Joe Biden, Prof. Gates, and Cambridge policeman, Sgt. James Crowley.
Thereafter, Obama’s even-handedness in matters of race became less evident.
In the aftermath of “white Hispanic” George Zimmerman’s killing of African American Trayvon Martin in 2012, for example, Obama made his sympathies for the latter very obvious. He blurted out that, “[i]f I had a son, he would look like Trayvon.” The Obama administration and the DOJ provided assistance to the prosecution’s ultimately unsuccessful effort to convict Zimmerman.
The Obama administration also pursued one-sided policies in the aftermath of the killing of African American Michael Brown by a white Ferguson (MO) policeman on August 9 2014. When race riots immediately broke out, the Obama/Holder-led DOJ sent agents to investigate the “gentle giant’s” death, but had to accept a grand jury’s decision not to charge Darren Wilson, a decision followed by another round of race riots.
By late summer, early fall of 2014, any sense that Obama was interested in racial healing was threadbare.
One consequence of the crisis in Ferguson was the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement, an overtly black racist organization which had begun after the Zimmerman-Martin incident, but had not received nationwide attention.
Shortly after a raucus demonstration against police in New York City, Obama invited leaders of this racist clique to visit the White House.
In short, Obama’s tack vis-á-vis race had shifted full-bore away from racial harmony.
Public opinion polls provide insights into public perceptions of trends in American race relations. Look at the Gallup poll, which asked the same question on several occasions: “Would you say relations between whites and blacks are very good, somewhat good, somewhat bad, or very bad.”
In mid-2008, 70% of whites said race relations were “very/somewhat” good, 29% opined they were “somewhat/very” bad, and 2% had no opinion. In mid 2016, 55% thought they were “very/somewhat” good, 44% opined they were “somewhat/very” bad, and 1% had no opinion. Among blacks in 2008, 61% thought race relations were “very/somewhat” good, 37% believed they were “somewhat/very” bad, and 1% had no opinion. By 2016, 49% of blacks still thought race relations were “very/somewhat” good,” but 50% said they were “somewhat/very” bad, and less than one percent had no opinion.
Some polls show larger shifts in opinions about the state of race relations before and after Obama entered the White House, and they are always toward worsened perspectives, especially among African Americans. Far from being a racial uniter, Obama was a divider.
In short, both whites’ and blacks’ views of race relations soured while Obama was Chief Executive. If Obama believed that by becoming more overtly racialist, he would witness improvements in blacks’ perceptions of race relations, he had to be disappointed. One wonders, therefore, what the price of a president’s overt black racism is.
Obama’s record on race relations indicates what may happen when the MSM refuses to vet an aspiring presidential candidate.
OBAMA’S MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY OF LA RAZA “The Race”
Most Americans (legals) would be appalled to know that from day one the Obomb has funded the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” with U.S. tax dollars and this racist party has operated out of the white house under LA RAZA V.P. Cecilia Munoz.
THE OBAMA WAR ON AMERICA: His OFA Party is Dedicated to Destroying American and Building the Obama Muslim-style dictatorship funded by crony banksters.
Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY) “OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever was.”
"Obama is no fool and he understands -- having encouraged Black Lives Matter and the war on police and law enforcement, having facilitated ballooning welfare rolls and doubling student debt to $1.35 trillion, having presided over a flood of immigrants illegally crossing the southern border, and having pushed unprecedented deficit spending that added nearly a trillion dollars annually to the federal debt and doubling that debt in eight years to $20 trillion -- that the U.S. is nearer collapse than at any previous time. And every Marxist knows that socialist transformation first requires collapse of the old order."
THE LEGACY of BARACK OBAMA: MUSLIM PSYCHOPATH AND BANKSTER RENT BOY WHO CAME NEAR TO CREATING A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP BY SABOTAGING AMERICA’S HOMELAND SECURITY AND FUNDING THE MEXICAN FASCIST RACIST PARTY of LA RAZA.
The WSWS has reported several times that during Obama’s administration the wealth of the richest 400 Americans grew from $1.57 trillion to $2.4 trillion and the stock market enjoyed one of its most successful runs in history.
Judicial Watch: Only Crimes in Russia Scandal Are from ‘Obama Gang’
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Government transparency activist group Judicial Watch has filed a against the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Department of the Treasury (DOT) seeking records related to the investigation of retired United States Army Lieutenant General Michel Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Breitbart News spoke exclusively to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, who said, “We’ve been looking into this story for months now and the only crimes connected to this Russian scandal we’ve been able to find so far are the illegal leaks of information and the violations of privacy by the Obama gang.”
Judicial Watch filed a FOIA on January 25, 2017 and only filed the lawsuit after the agencies failed to respond. The FOIA request was for “Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to the investigation of retired Gen. Michael Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak between October 1, 2016 and the present.”
The suit claims that “Defendants are violating FOIA by failing to search for and produce all records responsive to Plaintiff’s requests or demonstrate that the requested records are lawfully exempt from production.”
In a prepared statement, Tom Fitton commented:
President Trump is on to something. The Obama-connected wiretapping and illegal leaks of classified material concerning President Trump and General Flynn are a scandal. Judicial Watch aims to get to the truth about these crimes and we hope the Trump administration stands with us in the fight for transparency.
The lawsuit points out that on January 23, 2017, that the government was investigating Flynn, former national security adviser to President Trump, and said:
The calls were captured by routine US eavesdropping targeting the Russian diplomats, according to the intelligence and law enforcement officials. But the officials said some of the content of the conversation raised enough potential concerns that investigators are still looking into the discussions, amid a broader concern about Russian intelligence-gathering activities in the United States.
The officials all stressed that so far there has been no determination of any wrongdoing.
Radio host Mark Levin has outlined a sequence of events — — that shows how, starting in June 2016, the Obama administration filed requests with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications targeting Donald Trump and several advisers. Just prior’s to CNN’s report cited by Judicial Watch, the that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the CIA, the National Security Agency (NSA), and the Treasury Department were monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign.