Thursday, May 4, 2017





During Obama’s 8 year bankster regime, he openly operated and funded the Mexican fascist racist party of LA RAZA “The Race” from the White House under La Raza VP Cecilia Munoz…. Google Obama and LA RAZA!

The deal that supposedly reined in the Iranian nuclear program has proven to be a windfall for the Iranian military. Lifting sanctions on the Islamic Republic has allowed their military to increase the budget by 145%, giving the Iranians an offens...

Iran defense budget increases 145% thanks to cash from nuke deal

The deal that supposedly reined in the Iranian nuclear program has proven to be a windfall for the Iranian military.
Lifting sanctions on the Islamic Republic has allowed their military to increase the budget by 145%, giving the Iranians an offensive military capability they lacked until President Obama gave it to them.
Washington Free Beacon:
Iranian officials announced late last month that Iran's defense budget had increased by 145 percent under President Hassan Rouhani and that the military is moving forward with a massive restructuring effort aimed at making it "a forward moving force," according to regional reports.
Iranian leaders have stated since the Iran deal was enacted that they are using the massive amounts of cash released under the agreement to fund the purchase of new military equipment and other armaments. Iran also has pursued multi-million dollar arms deals with Russia since economic sanctions were nixed as part of the deal.
One of those deals included the sale of the Russian's highly sophisticated S-300 anti aircraft missile system. The S-300 is a huge leap forward in Iran's ability to shoot down US warplanes.
Leading members of Congress and U.S. officials working on the Iran portfolio suspect that at least a portion of the Obama administration's $1.7 billion cash payment to Iran  has been used to fund and support terrorists in the Middle East.
The latest disclosure about Iran's military buildup is further fueling concerns that U.S. cash assets returned to the country—which were released with no strings attached by the Obama administration—are helping Iran pursue a more aggressive military stance against U.S. forces in the region.
"President Obama flat-out caved in to Iran when he handed them the disastrous nuclear deal and $1.7 billion in cash payments that could assist Iran's military," Rep. Sean Duffy (R., Wis.), an opponent of the nuclear deal, told the Washington Free Beacon. "So it's no surprise that the world's lead sponsor of terrorism would feel emboldened to become more aggressive in the region and flex its military muscle."
Iranian Brigadier General Kiumars Heidari announced the military buildup during Iran's annual Army Day. While the announcement did not grab many headlines in the Western media, national security insiders have been discussing the announcement for weeks, according to conversations with multiple sources.
Iran's goal is to turn its army into an "offensive" force, a major shift from its historic role as a support agent for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, or IRGC, Iran's extremely well funded primary fighting force.
Iran hopes to revamp its army from top to bottom, including improving logistical capabilities, weaponry, and other armaments.
Mahan Abedin, an Iran analyst writing in Middle East Eye, described the announcement as a major shift in Iranian military policy that would allow the Islamic Republic to intervene in the Persian Gulf region, where the U.S. military has a significant presence.
Our Gulf State allies are extremely nervous about this build up and simultaneous US pullback in the Middle East. The Iranian posture is certain to set off a conventional arms race in the region and may even convince the Saudis to go nuclear. 
Did the Obama administration anticipate the Iranian military buildup. We were told at the time that it was probable that the Iranians would increase funding for their terrorist activities, but very little was said about the windfall for their conventional arms. President Obama deliberately set out to make Iran a regional superpower that soon - despite his claims to the contrary - will possess nuclear weapons.
It may be the dumbest, most reckless, most dangerous thing a US president has ever done. 



Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY) “OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever was.”

“Barack Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their

ostensible machinations to undermine an election and then a presidency if 

it were not for the fecklessness of the Republican  Party and the blind eye as well

as the tacit support of the mainstream media.”

 Final Death of the American White Middle Class

Under the Obama administration, more Americans have found themselves consigned to economic ghettos, living in neighborhoods where more than 40 percent subsist below the poverty level.

Millions more now live in “high poverty” districts of 20-40 percent poverty, according to recently released report by the Brookings Institution.

THE OBAMA BOOK DEAL: Sixty-five million dollars—or even $267.5 million—is a small price to pay for the contribution the former president made to enriching the already fabulously rich, defending the American ruling elite’s geopolitical interests around the world and continuing the assault on the wages, benefits and living standards of the working class.

Who does not remember the Obomb bending over to kiss the hem of the 9-11 invading Saudi dictator, King Lardbucket the Fornicator?



Let us see if the SAUDIS invaders will finance Obomb’s

PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY like they did Bush and Billary’s!

Selling Out America and Sucking In the Bribes!

It was always a given that Barack Obama would end up with a monument, no matter how much chaos he sowed in his two terms as president. A presidential library and museum became the participation trophy of American presidencies in the middle of the las...

Clichés abound as design for Obama presidential library unveiled in Chicago

It was always a given that Barack Obama would end up with a monument, no matter how much chaos he sowed in his two terms as president. A presidential library and museum became the participation trophy of American presidencies in the middle of the last century.  Add in the historic milestone of being the first African-American president (albeit one who came by this title without ancestors who were enslaved in this country) and the pretensions that adhere to anyone who has ever adopted the job title of “community organizer,” and you have a level of ambient righteousness that inevitably generates fatuous rhetoric the way a stagnant pond generates mosquitoes on hot summer day in the Midwest.
So when Barack and Michelle Obama tore themselves away from writing their $60 million worth of memoirs to unveil drawings of what is intended to become “The Barack Obama Presidential Center,” located just south of the Museum of Science and Industry on Chicago’s Southside, the fake humility and deference to “the community” reached escape velocity, threatening to rend the space-time continuum, and catapult the entire neighborhood into an alternate universe in which the Obama years saw genuine racial healing – the very promise that brought 2 terms in office to Obama.
You can immediately banish the notion that the “presidential center” is mostly a monument.  The Chicago Tribune reports that the ambitions expressed for it involve that mystical “community” – the ur-cliché of Obama’s entire career:
Calling it a "transformational project for this community," the former resident said he and Michelle Obama envisioned a vibrant setting that would be akin to Millennium Park — a destination for those drawn to the presidential center and the park itself.
Actually, the very first transformational impact on the community will be traffic jams:
But to achieve this, the plans call for closing Cornell Drive, a major access route used by thousands of commuters a day.
But worry not:
"It's not just a building. It's not just a park. Hopefully it's a hub where all of us can see a brighter future for the South Side," he told an audience of about 300 political and community leaders at the South Shore Cultural Center.
A hub for viewing the brighter future of the South Side! One where the murder rate compares favorably with Baghdad, perhaps? It is not clear how the monument will help bring that about, but maybe the gang bangers will be overcome with admiration of Obama and give up their violent ways.
Rest assured, the monument will not be an ego trip. The New York Times:
Sometimes they [presidential libraries]  are a monument to the past, he said, standing on stage in an auditorium on Wednesday; a record of accomplishments. “And a little bit of an ego trip,” he added. “‘See what I did.’” (snip)
“The main thing that Michelle and I contributed was just saying, ‘What is it that we want to see 10 years from now?’” he said, recounting his conversations with the architects who designed the center. “And we don’t want to see some big building that’s dead, and kids are getting dragged to it for a field trip. What we wanted was something that was alive, and that was a hub for the community and for the city and for the country.”
Does a building that is “alive” constitute the ideal home of a Constitution that is a “living document”?
As for the design unveiled yesterday itself, my first impression is of whiteness. There is just a whole lotta of whiteness going on here:

How all that whiteness will do over the years, as soot, grime, brutal winters, and acid rain take their toll is unknown. Future generations will get to draw their own conclusions.
A slightly pear-shaped museum tower will be the highest point on campus at 180 feet. That’s high enough to see gang shootings the brighter future of the South Side. As for the splaying of the museum, it kind of looks like big hips. Not sure what that reference is all about since the former president is slender.
The tower is mostly windowless, a fashion that has been with modern architecture for decades. The little cut-out at the base of the tower showing a glimpse of four floors reminds me of the way rats chew on mouldling in a slum apartment. Perhaps a bit of inspiration from slumlord Valerie Jarrett?
The layout includes an artificial hill, supposedly for sledding down in winter.

"He is intent on maximizing the damage he inflicted on the 

country during the two terms of his faux presidency, having 

now set up shop in Washington to pursue a post-presidency 

agenda advancing a left-wing insurgency, civil unrest, racial 

conflict and the destabilizing activities of a shadow."

May 4, 2017
Obama, the Anti-President
The Western Schism of the 13th and 14th centuries saw five antipopes contest the legitimate succession to the pontifical throne. The schism was officially put to rest by the Ecumenical Council of Constance in 1417, although three of the five papal charlatans continued unsuccessfully to rebel against the authority of the Council. What we might call the American Schism of our day resembles a bizarre rerun of that sectarian clash, albeit in a secular dimension. For eight years Washington was not Washington, but Avignon on the Potomac, presided over by Anti-President Barack Obama II.
Many observers feel that the controversial ascension of Obama to 

the White House is no longer newsworthy. The sun has 

apparently set on Obama’s destructive stewardship

of the country. He must be allowed to fade into political 

irrelevance while the country tackles without distraction the 

enormous problems that confront it. “There’s a lot of work to do,” 

writes one commenter to a recently posted article of mine, “Let’s 

start by consigning Obama to the dustbin of history, and repeat his 

name no more.”
This is a relatively common sentiment, but it is, I believe, a blinkered view of the Obama phenomenon. The sun is still at its zenith as the reality and repercussions of Obama’s tenure remain in force. Obama isn’t going away. He is intent on maximizing the damage he inflicted on the country during the two terms of his faux presidency, having now set up shop in Washington to pursue a post-presidency agenda advancing a left-wing insurgency, civil unrest, racial conflict and the destabilizing activities of a shadow government. His Alinskyite community organizing, 501(c) (4) nonprofit operations, advocacy with DNC backing for the “fundamental transformation” of America, a $60 million book contract, and the lure of obscenely lucrative speeches, clearly meant to further his former executive policies (as well as line his pockets), all continue to promote, as Mathew Vadum writes“the social polarization and ethno-cultural balkanization he encouraged while president.” Not even post-presidential interventionists like the heroic Teddy Roosevelt or the irritating nuisance Jimmy Carter saw fit to establish tactical headquarters in the city on the hill. Unlike any of his 43 predecessors, Obama is without shame or compunction in his violation of post-presidential tradition, conduct befitting the program of an anti-president.
But this is by no means the whole story.
American presidents swear an oath of office to honor the Constitution and defend the nation’s interests. Obama has done neither. If fact, he has labored assiduously against the social integrity, economic viability and political well-being of the country, burdening it with runaway debt and unemployment, initiating a program of lemon socialism (the stimulus package) and a form of national mortmain (GM, Chrysler), doubling down on scandals like Global Warming (that isn’t happening) and Obamacare (that isn’t working), repeatedly lying to the electorate, turning government institutions like the IRS against his own people, legitimizing theft via wealth redistribution, ruling through a camarilla of unaccountable special advisors or “czars,” dismantling the nation’s border controls, favoring theMuslim Brotherhood terrorist organization at home and abroad, surveilling across the national spectrum, acting, according to the New York Post, as a “stooge” for the Russians, and effectively vandalizing the country’s international image, prosperity and security. This is Obama’s so-called “legacy,” a kind of Herostratic honor (after a 4th century Ephesian named Herostratus who destroyed the Temple of Artemis in order to immortalize his name). Such a list of sinister “accomplishments” alone would amply qualify him for the title of Anti-President.
Further, as is common knowledge, the biographical dossier we have at our disposal is radically incomplete. All Obama’s vital documents are sequestered: his name change, baptism and adoption records, Noelani Elementary School records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, record with Illinois State Bar Association, and his law client list, medical records and passport records, among others. He has also suppressed the marriage license of his parents. His backdated Selective Service form remains unexplained and hisMassachusetts Social Security Number appears to be invalid. Moreover, the digital copy of Obama’s birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011 remains contentious; its authenticity has been disputed by many expert analysts. And there is considerably more that suggests we are dealing with a factitious personage, which would also qualify him for the title of Anti-President.
For these three reasons -- Obama’s intimate and continuing presence on the political scene, his Herostratic legacy, and his problematic dossier -- the Obama phenomenon cannot be pretended away as a matter of dwindling significance or as a peripheral distraction from present concerns. On the contrary, the election of Obama and all that it has entailed constitute an unprecedented rupture in the continuity of the American republican system of governance, ushering into power an interloper with imperial pretensions and a questionable history. What we are remarking is a break in habitual expectation regarding the presidential succession and a symptom of a profound malady in the body politic that demands remedial treatment.
One way or another, Americans must deal with the rip in their own political space-time continuum that brought a disruptive influx of dark energy into their world. As Chief Executive, Obama was the primary facilitator of the neo-Marxist revolution that is splitting the nation into warring moieties. He remains both its operational mover and symbolic architect. Such are the wages of an anti-presidency, whose effects will persist until they are recognized and materially resisted.
A change in the political culture of the U.S. would have to supervene. The present administration should do away with the scourge of pervasive voter fraud, a criminal offense that in all likelihood helped to bring Obama over the top and worked in favor of Hillary Clinton’s presidential bidMotor Voter would need to be repealed and mandatory Voter ID legislated to replace it.

Most crucially, a law requiring the public exposure of all biographically sensitive, campaign-financing, civil status and professional data pertaining to a presidential candidate might form part of the solution, removing the stigma and guarding against the return of the Obama effect. Such a move would be the American counterpart of the deliberations of the Council of Constance, eliminating the specter of an anti-president once and for all. There can be no doubt that the issue needs to be discussed, probed and resolved to ensure that a Schism of this nature does not happen again.

No comments: