THE SAUDI HATRED OF AMERICA
…. Their expanding Muslim invasion in the United States
THEY INVADED US 9-11 AND MURDERED
THOUSANDS OF OUR PEOPLE. THEY’RE STILL TRYING TO MURDER US AND WE’RE HANDING
THEM THE ARMS TO DO IT!
Who does not remember the Obomb bending over to
kiss the hem of the 9-11 invading Saudi dictator, King Lardbucket the
Fornicator?
THE SAUDI HATRED OF AMERICA
THE SAUDIS ROYAL
LARDBUCKETS and their boy Obomb:
Let
us see if the SAUDIS invaders will finance Obomb’s
PRESIDENTIAL
LIBRARY like they did Bush and Billary’s!
Selling Out America and Sucking
In the Bribes!
THE OBAMA AND SAUDIS PARTNERSHIP:
WILL THEY FINANCE HIS LIBRARY AND MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP
IN THE MAKING?
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/02/barack-obama-his-saudis-wahhabi.html
Palace coup in Saudi
Arabia
By
Jean Shaoul
23 June 2017
Saudi Arabia’s 82-year-old King Salman has issued a series of
decrees proclaiming his favourite son, the 31-year-old Mohammed bin Salman, as
his immediate successor. He supplants Salman’s nephew, the head of internal
security and deputy prime minister, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef.
Salman also consolidated Mohammed’s power base, appointing the
34-year-old Abdulaziz bin Saud bin Nayef, who is very close to the new crown
prince, to head the million-strong interior ministry, responsible for the
suppression and intimidation of the Saudi people in the name of “fighting
terrorism.”
The new crown prince, previously second in line to the throne,
already holds the defence and economy portfolios, and chairs the highest board
of Aramco, the world’s largest oil company. The appointment makes him king in
all but name, presiding over a royal household of more than 7,000 princes riven
with factional infighting.
He sought support for his accession to the throne by reversing
cuts to civil service salaries implemented last September and granting an
additional week’s holiday, announced to mark the end of Ramadan. According to
the Economist, this will add a further US$13 billion
to the budget deficit, projected at US$86 billion or 12 percent of GDP this
year.
He also orchestrated a series of moves to isolate bin Nayef and strengthen
his own position, including appointing his younger brother, Prince Khalid, as
ambassador to Washington to strengthen his relations with the Trump
administration.
Relations with former President Barack Obama’s White House became
increasingly fraught after Washington failed to follow up on its threat to
attack Syria in 2013 and reached a nuclear accord with Shi’ite-ruled Iran that
Riyadh vehemently opposed.
Mohammed bin Salman also appointed a cousin and ally as deputy
governor of the oil-rich Eastern Province, whose governor is Mohammed bin
Nayef’s brother, Saud bin Nayef.
Salman’s dethroning of a second crown prince (he pensioned off
Prince Muqrin in April 2015) since his accession to the throne in January 2015
reflects the increasingly turbulent situation in which the House of Saud, the
world’s largest oil producer and crucial US ally, finds itself.
The palace coup is a desperate attempt to resolve the military,
political and economic conflicts that stem from the decades of US-led wars in
the region at the expense of the Saudi masses. It portends ever-more autocratic
rule, economic hardship and an escalation of regional wars of which the ongoing
hostile moves by Saudi Arabia against Qatar and Iran are the most dramatic
indication.
The economic crisis gripping the country has been acerbated by the
murderous, but largely unsuccessful war instigated by Mohammed bin Salman
against the rebel Houthis and their ally, former President Ali Abdullah Saleh
in Yemen, who still control the capital and most of the northern part of the
country. The war has led to 4,773 confirmed civilian deaths and 8,272 injured,
mass starvation and cholera, with a child dying every 10 minutes and 7 million
people at acute risk of starvation in what the United Nations has called the
worst humanitarian disaster since 1945.
The war has served to destabilise Riyadh’s relations with its
traditional allies. Pakistan has refused repeated requests to send troops to
fight the Houthis, while Oman has stayed out of it and Egypt has provided only
token assistance.
Riyadh has also poured tens of billions of dollars into arming
reactionary Islamist militias, designated as “rebels” in the US-backed war to
overthrow the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad and isolate Iran,
Syria’s main backer in the Middle East. The six-year-long war has killed nearly
half a million people. Four million people have fled the country while upwards
of 6.3 million are internally displaced.
The Saudis have whipped up sectarian tensions between Sunni and
Shia throughout the region and opposed Iran’s support for Riyadh’s political
rivals in Lebanon, Bahrain and Iraq.
Mohammed bin Salman, as minister of defence, has adopted a
particularly bellicose attitude towards Iran, framing tensions with Tehran in
sectarian terms, stating that Iran’s goal is “to control the Islamic world” and
to spread its Shiite doctrine, and vowing to take “the battle” to Iran.
Emboldened by President Donald Trump’s first overseas visit to
Riyadh last month, he precipitated a crisis in the Gulf Cooperation Council by
trying to isolate Qatar, accusing it of supporting ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood
and Iran.
His purpose was to dragoon Qatar behind the Saudis’ stand against
Iran and its other predatory policies, including unstinting support for Egypt’s
military regime. He organised an economic blockade, tantamount to a declaration
of war, upsetting the defence establishment in Washington, which has a crucial
American military base in Qatar, and further destabilising the region. Turkey
has come to Qatar’s aid as has Iran, while Pakistan, Oman and Kuwait remain
neutral.
Iran has accused the US and Saudi Arabia of being behind the ISIS
terror attacks in Tehran two weeks ago that killed at least 12 people and
injured dozens more when gunmen and suicide bombers attacked the parliament and
the mausoleum of Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic.
Social tensions are explosive. The fall in oil prices, upon which
Saudi Arabia depends for 70 percent of its revenue, has led to a drastic
cutback in public expenditure, the imposition of a value-added tax and the
proposed sale of 5 percent of Aramco to fund an economic diversification
programme.
In the face of massive budget deficits, plummeting foreign
reserves and growth of less than 1 percent, the lowest for almost four years,
Mohammed overturned the Kingdom’s decades-long policy of buying political
quiescence with a social contract that has provided some security—via low
utility prices, social subventions and public-sector jobs—for the Saudi
population, and promoted a wave of Sunni-based Saudi nationalism.
It was he who, last September, slashed housing, vacation and
sickness allowances and reduced some civil service salaries by a third.
Utility bills rose as subsidies fell, fuelling poverty levels
while he splashed out US$500 billion on a yacht.
This month, the government tightened restrictions on foreign
workers, who constitute about 12 million of the country’s 33 million
population, in a bid to reduce unemployment among Saudi nationals, reserving
retail jobs for Saudis. One million are expected to leave in the next few
weeks.
The official unemployment rate of 12.1 percent is widely believed
to be an underestimate. Other estimates suggest it is 27-29 percent, rising to
33 percent among young people between 20 and 24 years of age and 38 percent for
24-to-29-year-olds, in a country where two thirds of the population are under
30. Some 1.9 million Saudis out of a total citizenry of 20 million are expected
to enter the workforce in the next decade.
While Saudi Arabia’s huge oil wealth is owned by a royal family
that lives in the lap of luxury, at least 20 percent of Saudis suffer
“crippling” or “severe” poverty, and between 2 and 4 million people live in
poverty in Riyadh alone.
Saudi Arabia’s Shia minority in the oil-rich Eastern province
suffer from crushing poverty following decades of economic neglect and
political marginalisation. Their villages and towns such as Qatif, al-Hasa and
particularly al-Awamiya, the hometown of the executed Shia cleric, Sheikh Nimr
Baqih al Nimr, lack the infrastructure of their Sunni counterparts.
Migrant workers, mainly from the Indian
subcontinent and Southeast Asia, who
number about 12 million, fare even worse,
with low wages and financial hardship,
exacerbated by an exploitative sponsorship
system.
subcontinent and Southeast Asia, who
number about 12 million, fare even worse,
with low wages and financial hardship,
exacerbated by an exploitative sponsorship
system.
IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY
AND MASSIVE MUSLIM MINERET TO CALL MUSLIMS TO PRAYER
AND HATRED OF AMERICA.
The Obama Presidential Library Will Be Funded by America's 9-11 Invading Saudis Who Ban Christians and Jews From Their Dictatorship.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-obama-presidential-library-will-be.html
The Obama Presidential Monument to a Psychopath Will
Provide Call to Prayers in the Muslim Tradition With One Massive Minaret
UNDER THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OBAMA, THE MEX DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE BORDER TO UNDEFENDED BORDER
Mexican cartel smugglers have taken full
advantage of the system in order to maximize their profits from human smuggling
as well as the smuggling of illegal aliens. In 2014, Mexico’s Gulf Cartel was
able to make
approximately $38 million in a matter of months off human smuggling alone.
ASK HOW MUCH THE BILLARY PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY
HAS SUCKED IN, AND THE BUSH FAMILY’S SAUDIS-CARLYLE GROUP, Inc AND THE BUSH
LIBRARY!
HILLARY
AND OBOMB’S DIRTY SAUDIS DICTATORS…. How much as she sucked in?
THE CLINTONS SERVE THEIR 9-11 INVADING SAUDIS PAYMASTERS!
DANCING WITH DICTATORS.... BOTH THE CLINTONS ARE EXPERT DANCERS!
MUSLIMS: GLOBAL
RAPIST AND
MURDERERS!
MURDERERS!
But she
was blindfolded, beaten with plastic cables, suspended by her arms
for some time and then raped.
Koran 2:191 “Slay the
unbelievers wherever you find them.”
Koran 3:28 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.”
Koran 3:85 “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.”
Koran 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”
Koran 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran.”
Koran 8:60 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.”
Koran 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.”
Koran 9:5 “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.”
Koran 9:28 “The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.”
Koran 9:30 “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”
Koran 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.”
Koran 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.”
Koran 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them."
Koran 3:28 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.”
Koran 3:85 “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.”
Koran 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”
Koran 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran.”
Koran 8:60 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.”
Koran 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.”
Koran 9:5 “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.”
Koran 9:28 “The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.”
Koran 9:30 “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”
Koran 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.”
Koran 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.”
Koran 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them."
MUSLIMS: GLOBAL
RAPIST AND MURDERRERS!
But she
was blindfolded, beaten with plastic cables, suspended by her arms
for some time and then raped.
MUST
change the language like the left does. A simple islam is against human rights
will do. According to Sharia law:• Theft is punishable by amputation of the
right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death (see Allah moon god).
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death (compulsion in religion).
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (Muhammad’s words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination (see Religion of Peace).
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits (see Errors in Quran).
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be “Halal”.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
Muslims also believe that homosexuality is punishable by death. Oh and halal death for animals means as long and painful a death as possible for the poor animal. At least with yesterday's march it is now clear beyond any reasonable doubt that the left is against human rights
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death (see Allah moon god).
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death (compulsion in religion).
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (Muhammad’s words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination (see Religion of Peace).
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits (see Errors in Quran).
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be “Halal”.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
Muslims also believe that homosexuality is punishable by death. Oh and halal death for animals means as long and painful a death as possible for the poor animal. At least with yesterday's march it is now clear beyond any reasonable doubt that the left is against human rights
THE SAUDIS HATRED OF AMERICA
…. Their expanding Muslim invasion in the United States
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/06/rick-moran-should-we-keep-arming-and.html
MUSLIMS: GLOBA RAPIST BECAUSE THEY DE-CLIT
THEIR WOMEN!
MUSLIMS AND
MURDER… IT’S GLOBAL, IT’S
DAILY, IT’S PURE MUSLIM HATRED!
DOZENS MURDERED ATTENDING PALM SUNDAY
SERVICES…. You really want more Muslims admitted to this country?
AMERICA CRUMBLES as we hand global Muslim dictatorships
BILLIONS to rebuild their empires of hate and death!
BILL CLINTON
SUCKS IN BRIBES FROM ISIS DONORS!
The Muslim Sheikhdom Qatar is a
major sponsor of ISIS and global anti-American terrorism. How disturbing is it
that Bill Clinton sucked in a bribe of ONE MILLION DOLLARS under the guise of a
birthday gift? There is NO one the Clintons will not sell us out to and have
already!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-muslim-conspiracy-in-america-will.html
Gulf of Aqaba Treaty: a Saudi Repudiation of the Camp David
Accords
June 26, 2017
Gulf of Aqaba Treaty: a Saudi Repudiation of the Camp David
Accords
After
more than a year of a heated debate, Egypt finally ceded two small Red Sea Islands to Saudi Arabia, giving KSA control
over the Straits of Tiran and the Gulf of Aqaba. These waterways separate the
Sinai Peninsula from the Arabian mainland and portions of the
coastline are owned by Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.
Giving ownership of Tiran and Sanafir Islands and control of the gulf and
straits to Saudi Arabia is a strategic mistake and a security threat for five
reasons.
1)
Almost every regime in Saudi Arabia has furthered expansionist, imperialistic
agendas. Historically, Saudi rulers have attempted to lead the Muslim Umma
(nation) by conquest or political and religious imperialism. King Salman bin
Abdulaziz Al Saud’s seizure of power in 2015 wasn’t smooth, there were and still are attempts to
overthrow him. The Saudi internal conflict will most likely escalate after King
Salman’s historic precedent to move the Saudi succession from the house of
Abdulaziz ibn al-Saud to the house of Salman. King Salman may believe that
asserting his territorial control of Gulf of Aqaba will help him strengthen his
domestic position by increasing his regional and international power. Whether
the Tiran treaty, and succession coup stunt works or backfires is yet to be
seen.
2)
King Salman has allegedly
agreed to a portion of the
Camp David Accords, which guarantees Israel unfettered access through the
Straits of Tiran. This acquiescence creates a serious catch-22 for the King.
While the deal increases King Salman’s regional power, an agreement with the
Jewish state threatens his domestic authority, because he is bound by Islamic
Sunni jurisprudence. For example, the Saudi view of treaties with Israel was
expressed by King Salman supporter and Saudi celebrity Sheikh, Salman
al-Ouda. When Mr. al-Ouda was asked about the legitimacy of treaties with
Israel, he answered with a Fatwa issued in 1988-1989 and signed by 60 Sunni
scholars. It declared jihad against Israel adding, “under no circumstances is a
person or an entity to recognize Jewish authority over any fraction of the land
of Palestine.”
If
King Salman were to actually abide by any element of the Camp David Accords,
his rule would become illegitimate according to Saudi Arabia’s fundamentalist
Islamic system. These are the views Saudi rulers indoctrinate their citizens to
adopt as the sole legitimate Islamic position towards Israel.
3)
According to the Sunni Saudi narrative, suicide bombings against Jews and
non-Muslims is a legitimate form of dissent. For example, a member of Saudi
Arabia’s Supreme Council of Scholars and Advisor at the Saudi Royal Court,
Abdallah Ibn Man'a previously stated in an official
Fatwa, “The best form of jihad for Allah, is martyrdom in his cause.
Whoever dies in such an operation, is a martyr.”
Moreover,
Saudi Arabia indoctrinates its security officers into adopting the belief in
suicide bombings. For example, former security police officer and current
Muslim sheikh Sami bin Khalid Awad el-Hamoud, received his Master’s degree
in Islamic jurisprudence from King Saudi University in Riyadh. His thesis was titled, “Suicide Operations: Its forms and
its jurisprudence,” where he argued that any region governed by non-Muslim laws
is a “house of war,” where jihad in all its forms, should be exercised.
Since
Salman has never shown any intention of abandoning Islamic jurisprudence, which
is Saudi Arabia’s raison d'être, his only solution under Sunni theology would
be to officially agree to the accords, but unofficially continue to support
militant Islamic activities.
It’s
puzzling why Egypt and Israel would agree to further associate with King
Salman, who was accused by the New York Times for
direct involvement in financing terrorism in Pakistan and Bosnia. While Israel
is officially granted freedom of passage in Gulf of Aqaba by the Camp David
Accords, there is absolutely no evidence that Salman will abide by the accords
or that he would not abuse his power in the Gulf of Aqaba. This would deeply
endanger both Egypt and Israel.
4) The
possibility that King Salma will facilitate a jihadist migration into Sinai,
given his history as a terror financier, is not far-fetched. The presence of
more jihadists in Sinai, would endanger both Egypt and Eilat. Sadly, this
scenario is likely given the fact that KSA plans to build a bridge linking Sinai to Arabia. Many have
taken KSA’s newfound control of the Gulf of Aqaba at face value and celebrated
it as a Saudi adoption of part of the Camp David Accords. The treaty should be
more accurately viewed as a Saudi repudiation of the accords, given the
negative possible outcomes for both Egypt and Israel’s security.
A
warning about Saudi control of Tiran and Sanafir, was communicated in a 1957
CIA intelligence brief titled, “Prospects of an Armed
Clash in the Gulf of Aqaba.” The brief warned -- “Saudi Arabia, which controls
the east coast of the Straits of Tiran, could conceivably take unilateral
action to prevent entry of Israeli or Israeli-bound vessels into the Gulf.” The
briefing continued, “In the event that Saudi forces were to occupy the islands
they might attempt to control shipping through the straits of Tiran from
positions on the islands.” It’s still 1957 in Saudi Arabia, and if Salman and
his son are overthrown, the possibility of replacing them with an Iranian
friendly option, such as Prince Ahmed bin Abdel Aziz al-Saud, would mean that a
Saudi-Iran coalition could be created.
5)
Signs of other security concerns caused by the treaty have already begun to
manifest. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Turkey-based Egyptian Revolutionary Council (ERC), has
basically declared jihad in Gulf of Aqaba in an official statement on its official Facebook page. The ERC
called upon Egyptians living in the cities overlooking the Red Sea, to
“struggle to liberate” the Islands and the Gulf of Aqaba and treat them as,
“occupied territories.”
In
another veiled call for terrorism, the statement also urged citizens to “treat
all Saudi companies and institutions, as occupying forces.” Not only does this
destabilize Egypt’s security, more dangerously, it can inspire a coup d'état in
Egypt. A coup could be launched with the excuse of defending Egyptian land,
which may work given President el-Sisi’s plummeting popularity after the treaty
signing.
The
issue of the Red Sea islands is part of a broader and reoccurring
question of whether or not the free world should be making deals and
treaties with Islamic theocracies. The international community would be well
advised to refrain from further official treaties with Sunni and other
theocratic nations, until these regimes reform their governments and recognize
the modern international laws and treaties, to which they have already
committed. Until that time, it is irresponsible to make treaties, which have
repeatedly backfired. The Saudi control of the Gulf of Aqaba, is almost as
dangerous to regional peace as President Barack Obama’s Iranian nuclear deal.
No comments:
Post a Comment