Wednesday, October 4, 2017

NICHOLAS J. KASTER - DAVID BROOKS WANTS GOP TO EMBRACE LA RAZA SUPREMACY, OPEN BORDERS, NO LEGAL NEED APPLY TO FINISH OFF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY..... Unless Brooks thinks the illegal hordes are voting Democrat!

JOE LEGAL v LA RAZA JOSE ILLEGAL
Here’s how it breaks down; will make you want to be an illegal!




JUDICIAL WATCH:

ILLEGALS VOTING IN MASSIVE NUMBERS IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA




''California is going to be a Hispanic state," said Mario Obeldo, former head of MALDEF. "Anyone who does not like it should leave."


And M.E.Ch.A's goal is even more radical: an independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this organization  gives to the seven states of the U.S. Southwest – Arizona,  California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah."



The New York Times' resident faux conservative, David Brooks, believes that establishment Republicans ought to mount a "philosophical assault" on President Trump's immigration policy.  In his most recent opinion piece, Brooks c...

David Brooks wants the GOP to embrace open borders

The New York Times' resident faux conservative, David Brooks, believes that establishment Republicans ought to mount a "philosophical assault" on President Trump's immigration policy.  In his most recent opinion piece, Brooks contends that while the Trumpists "have a story to tell the country about what's gone wrong ... [t]he regular Republicans have no story, no conviction and no argument."
When Trump says "we need to build walls to keep out illegals," he is telling "a tribal story," Brooks contends.
Brooks wants establishment Republicans to tell a very different story.  "The whole point of America," he writes, "is that we are ... a universal nation, founded on universal principles."  The whole point?  There is a not a word in his screed about where those principles came from and who brought them over.
The founding principles set out in Declaration of Independence may be framed in universal language, but they are the product of a Western, specificallyAnglophone, culture.  If we cherish those principles, then it should follow that any immigration must be done slowly and carefully so that new entrants are properly assimilated.  But not according to Brooks.  There isn't a word in his essay about assimilation.
One can almost hear the orchestra swell.  "This striving dream is still lurking in every heart.  It's waiting for someone who has the guts to say no to tribe, yes to universal nation, no to fences[.]" (My emphasis).
Brooks's advice to the Republican establishment, in other words, is to openly advocate the "open borders" policies of George Soros.  I'm sure this would be wildly popular with bicoastal elites and a handful of policy wonks in D.C.  That Brooks thinks it would be embraced by heartland GOP voters shows how out of touch he is.

October 4, 2017

Illegal Immigration: An Economic Poison Pill


The conversation surrounding illegal immigration is deeply personal for many people -- it is emotionally-charged and politically divisive. Debates often devolve into mud-slinging contests, and arguments morph into feigned outrage, even violent protests. But from an economic perspective the question is settled science: illegal aliens cost taxpayers billions, impoverish American workers, and are completely unnecessary for America’s economic success.
To begin with, illegal immigrants are expensive. According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s 2017 report, illegal immigrants, and their children, cost American taxpayers a net $116 billion annually -- roughly $7,000 per alien annually. While high, this number is not an outlier: a recent study by theHeritage Foundation found that low-skilled immigrants (including those here illegally) cost Americans trillions over the course of their lifetimes, and a study from the National Economics Editorial found that illegal immigration costs America over $140 billion annually. As it stands, illegal immigrants are a massive burden on American taxpayers.
Although border control is a federal responsibility, state and local governments shoulder two-thirds of the costs associated with illegal immigration. Unsurprisingly, this costs California more than any other state: California spends$30.3 billion on illegal aliens annually -- 17.7 percent of the state budget. Texas is next: illegal immigration costs the State of Texas $12.4 billion annually, or roughly 10 percent of the state's budget. In third place is New York, which spends $7.4 billion on illegal immigration.
Of course, the tax burden is only part of the story: illegal immigration also distorts the labor market, hurting American workers. Ever hear of the law of supply and demand? It is how the free market determines prices: when demand increases, prices increase (more people bid-up the price); conversely, when supply increases, prices decrease (less scarcity means less urgency), and vice versa. Supply and demand underpins the price of everything from gasoline, to apples, to the value of a person’s labor -- surgeons command high prices because there is a limited supply of surgeons, whereas store clerks make minimum wage because anyone can be a store clerk.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/proxy/AVvXsEi1RrqZim6c4orewJ-sKBV2LkpHfkaGDgzE8KfBipdJ3RuzWJcLMILPTNNM0r-ZrH2I4HdUyo9vGEC4j_WylpKqgENCuvW66OO5qardGL4CVNj5LBytghzcKVIxH6gz_lqTBfve5EheAUG1xdadw8xnkaezV4agHVFAH5A3LD9l8eis63c=According to Pew Research, illegal immigration has flooded America’s labor market with at least 12 million new workers. This has dramatically, and rapidly increased the labor supply and therefore decreased wages for American workers. Ample evidence supports this claim. For example, before Hurricane Harvey, President Trump’s crackdown on illegal aliens had already caused wages for construction workers to rise by 30 percent in Texas (half of Texas’ construction workers were illegal aliens). Likewise,businesses in Maine were forced to hire American workers after the availability of visas for temporary foreign workers were restricted. As a result, unemployment decreased, wages increased, and working conditions improved in order to attract American workers. Illegal labor has distorted America’s labor markets, and hurt American workers in the process.
Finally, America’s economy will not collapse without easy access to illegal labor.
The standard refrain can be summed up as: “we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won’t do.” This is nonsense for two reasons. First, the claim is predicated upon the false assumption that America’s labor market is saturated and requires more workers to continue growing. This could not be further from the truth: right now fewer that 150 million Americans (out of 320 million) are employed, likewise there are 23 million Americans currently looking for work -- twice the number of illegal aliens in the country. Even assuming that every illegal aliens was employed, replacing them with American workers would still leave 11 million Americans unemployed.
Second, the claim is undermined by actual labor statistics. According to theBureau of Labor Statistics, millions of Americans -- of all races -- currently work as janitors, laborers, and agricultural workers. In fact, only four percent of American agricultural workers are illegal aliens, according to a report in theNational Review, putting to bed the myth that we would starve without illegal laborers. Clearly Americans are willing to work any job, provided they are compensated at fair market value -- this is not currently happening precisely because many illegals work under-the-table.
Believe it or not, states without illegal immigrants, like Montana or Ohio, are not economic backwaters with exorbitantly high costs of living -- people in Idaho can still afford McDonald’s and Starbucks, they just pay teenagers to work the drive-thrus. In fact, the cost of living in said states is often cheaper, because their governments do not require high taxes to subsidize legions of illegal aliens.
It is also worth mentioning that America is the only developed nation, until very recently, that imports millions of illegal immigrants to work in its service sector -- other rich nations like Japan and Canada, do not. Yet despite this, the GDP per capita of Japan has actually grown faster than America’s during the same period. The same is true of Canada and Australia. If illegal immigration is such an economic bonanza, why are Americans being left behind by nations without this “advantage”?
University professors, Silicon Valley CEOs, and politicians are not losing their jobs to illegals -- ordinary folk are. Illegal immigration is a contentious issue, but it remains important to couch policy discussions in facts -- not just abstract principles.

No comments: