Notice how we never hear the phony populist
Trump talking about E-VERIFY!
AMERICA: NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
“The percentage of
foreign-born workers in the U.S. labor force has more than tripled over the
last four decades and while the U.S. represents just 5 percent of the world’s
population it attracts 20 percent of the world’s immigrants, according to a new
report.”
Open the floodgates of our welfare
state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the world and in
a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone.
Those most impacted are middle class
and lower middle class. It is they whose jobs are taken, whose raises are
postponed, whose schools are filled with non-English speaking children that
absorb precious resources for remedial English, whose public parks are trashed
and whose emergency rooms serve as the local clinic for the illegal underground.
THE SECRET REPORT ON ILLEGALS TAKING
MIDDLE AND HIGH END JOBS…. What? You thought they only took the sh//// -it
jobs?
Members of Congress broadly oppose a legislative nationwide E-Verify mandate for employers because “they know it will work,” said NumbersUSA’s Rosemary Jenks, explaining why E-Verify is not being pushed in congressional negotiations for an amnesty deal for recipients of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Jenks further noted that both parties are beholden to special interests supportive of “mass migration.”
Jenks offered her analysis during a Monday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with Breitbart News’s Senior Editors-at-Large Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak.
Mansour asked Jenks why most Republicans were not supporting a legislative nationwide mandate for E-Verify use by employers. “Why do you think that this isn’t being pushed, then? It seems like a no-brainer. Why is this not being included in all the negotiations?” she said.
“I think [E-Verify] is not being pushed precisely because members of Congress know it will work,” said Jenks. “I think that is exactly the reason it’s not being pushed. Democrats, for sure, don’t want mandatory E-Verify because they know it will discourage illegal immigration, which will discourage the push for the next amnesty. And, let’s face it, the establishment Republicans don’t want it because they know it will be effective and eliminate their cheap labor pools.”
Special interests, including “big business,” “organized religion,” and “ethnic advocacy groups,” subvert popular American will via their funding and political agitation, said Jenks, adding, “It’s about the donors and about the Democrat Party wanting mass immigration. Those are the two factors that rule every immigration debate. It’s always the big business donors, organized religion, the ethnic advocacy groups. All of the money is behind mass immigration, and then, there’s the American people on the other side. That’s the problem we have had. That’s why we haven’t controlled immigration in the last five decades.”
Legislating a national mandate for E-Verify use by employers is more important than construction of a southern border wall, argued Jenks. “In our view, mandatory E-Verify is more important than a wall. So that is the one place where we’re hoping that we can move the administration to saying E-Verify is a must-have.”
Approximately half of “the illegal population” is composed of foreigners who lawfully entered the homeland and overstay their visas, said Jenks. An E-Verify mandate on employers, she added, would “mostly shut down” the lure of employment for illegal aliens.
E-Verify usage by employers would facilitate more effective enforcement of immigration law by allowing federal authorities to target businesses abstaining for its use, said Jenks. “They have a clearer target for enforcement measures.”
Jenks listed the following elements as “must-haves” for any legislative amnesty proposal:
1) limiting the amnesty to the DACA population;
2) ending chain migration;
3) ending the “Diversity Visa Program” lottery;
4) implementation of effective border security and interior enforcement measures; and
5) implementation of a national mandate for employer use of E-Verify.
1) limiting the amnesty to the DACA population;
2) ending chain migration;
3) ending the “Diversity Visa Program” lottery;
4) implementation of effective border security and interior enforcement measures; and
5) implementation of a national mandate for employer use of E-Verify.
Breitbart News Tonight airs Monday through Friday on SiriusXM’s Patriot channel 125 from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern (6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific).
LISTEN:
GOP Amnesty Negotiator John Cornyn Wants More White-Collar Immigrants
Texas GOP Sen. John Cornyn today called for an immigration deal to increase the supply of foreign graduates for the white-collar jobs sought by debt-burdened, college-graduate Americans.
Cornyn is under pressure from the many business groups who recognize that cheap white-collar immigrants cut payroll costs and raise profits. The greater supply of skilled labor forces down salaries for American professionals in many jobs, including technology, business, medicine, education and even journalism.
Cornyn is the second-ranking GOP Senator, and he argued that reductions to the visa-lottery and chain-migration programs can allow increases in skilled immigration programs, such as green cards for the foreign graduates of Americans colleges. He said:
We might to maybe reassign some of those visas to merit-based immigration, people who have graduated with skills that we need here in the United States, including the STEM field — science, technology, engineering, math.I think that would — I think that makes a lot of sense. but obviously, I am not going to decide this by myself. we’re going to have to build a coalition of Democrats and Republicans, and I think we can.
Under current laws, companies employ a roughly 2 million foreign graduates under various types of visa programs, including the H-1B, OPT, L-1 and J-1 visas. In 2017, Texas universities and companies got 25,000 H-1B new visas, suggesting a resident population of at least 100,000 H-1B workers in the state.
Many of the foreign graduates work at very low wages in universities, healthcare, technology, teaching, accounting, business, and fashion, partly because they will get a deferred bonus of citizenship from the federal government. The cheap-labor policy is backed by many business groups, including Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us.
If implemented, Cornyn’s proposal could add more than 300,000 foreign graduates to the labor marketplace each year, alongside the 800,000 indebted Americans who graduate as doctors, business managers, architects, accountants, teachers, designers, statisticians, and therapists.
But Cornyn’s proposal to transfer — not eliminate — the 50,000 visa lottery visas and the roughly 250,000 chain-migration visas would also force many Americans graduates downwards to compete for jobs against blue-collar Americans. That movement would pressure wages in the United States, and conflict with Trump’s “Buy Americans, Hire American” policy, which has helped raise Americans’ salaries in 2017 by curbing overall immigration inflows.
Cornyn’s call for raising the number of white-collar immigrants may become part of the second round of negotiations after Congress and the President come to a deal on the first four issues, said one source. In the first round, Cornyn “has been solid” in support the president’s four objectives, the source said.
In his Senate speech, Cornyn also said:
Any solution we come up with … must also protect the 320 million Americans who already live in the country … We need to correspondingly assure the American people that we are serious about border security and enforcing our laws.
Cornyn and House GOP Majority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy are the two GOP members of the four-man panel now trying to develop some legislative package that meets Trump’s popular immigration priorities. Those priorities are labeled under four categories — ending chain-migration, ending the visa lottery, building a border wall with needed enforcement legal changes, and providing some form of amnesty to the 690,000 registered DACA enrollees.
In contrast, Democrats and some liberal Republicans have been pushing to provide an amnesty for perhaps 8 million people, without offering anything significant on chain migration, the visa lottery or the wall. That package was decisively rejected January 11 by Trump, prompting the Democrats to filibuster the federal 2018 budget.
On January 22, after Senate Democrats ended their filibuster, the White House slammed the “Gang of Six” plan:
Their proposal provides a path to citizenship or legalization to at least 8 million unlawful immigrants: “dreamers”, their siblings and their parents. Flake-Graham-Durbin want to leave extended-family chain migration in place which means millions more relatives in foreign countries would be able to come to America, bringing the total covered population past 10 million …The Flake-Graham-Durbin proposal embodies every reason Americans do not trust Washington. It puts people who are in this country unlawfully ahead of our own American citizens. The Trump Administration remains committed to bipartisan responsible immigration reform that truly secures the border and puts the interests of the American people first.
After the vote, Trump also invited several GOP Senators to the White House to discuss the next stage of the debate. They included Cornyn, Sen. Tom Cotton, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Sen. James Lankford, Sen. David Perdue, and Sen. Thom Tillis.
Four million Americans turn 18 each year and begin looking for good jobs in the free market.
But the federal government inflates the supply of new labor by annually accepting 1 million new legal immigrants, by providing work-permits to roughly 3 million resident foreigners, and by doing little to block the employment of roughly 8 million illegal immigrants.
That inflow is applauded by many GOP and Democratic Senators who face constant pressure from business groups for more cheap workers.
The Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via mass-immigration floods the market with foreign labor, spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate prices, widens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.
The cheap labor policy has hit college graduates, not just blue-collar workers.
The cheap-labor policy has also reduced investment and job creation in many interior states because the coastal cities have a surplus of imported labor. For example, almost 27 percent of zip codes in Missouri had fewer jobs or businesses in 2015 than in 2000, according to a new report by the Economic Innovation Group. In Kansas, almost 29 percent of zip codes had fewer jobs and businesses in 2015 compared to 2000, which was a two-decade period of massive cheap-labor immigration.
Because of the successful cheap-labor strategy, wages for men have remained flat since 1973, and a large percentage of the nation’s annual income has shifted to investors and away from employees.
Raul Labrador:
Majority Leader McCarthy’s Future Depends on Amnesty Fight
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
House Majority Leader Kevin
McCarthy won’t disappoint Republican voters during the argument over
immigration policy and amnesty for illegals, said Rep. Raul Labrador, one of
four GOP co-authors of a major immigration and amnesty policy bill.
“I think he will be strong on this,” Labrador told Breitbart
News. Labrador continued:
I think he likes our bill. I don’t know if he’s going to champion
it, but he also has a future that he needs to think about. He needs to decide
whether he will stand with the American people or not and I think he will …
I think it is imperative that we stand strong on this issue.
Right now the Democratic base is energized and if you want to energize the
Republican base, the best thing you can do is keep your promises [to
voters]. The worst thing you can do in 2018 is cave to Democrats on
immigration because the base will not show up, so the Democrats will then take
over the House and the Senate
The issue is a test for McCarthy’s leadership, Labrador said:
The [2018] national campaign for both the House and the Senate
needs to be that the Republicans understand the importance of security at the
border and security at home, and the Democrats are willing … to protect an
illegal population. I just don’t see how that is a winning formula.
Labrador is elected from Idaho and will leave the House this year
to run for governor. He chairs the judiciary committee’s panel on immigration
and border security, and he co-authored the GOP’s “Securing America’s Future Act”
immigration-and-amnesty bill.
McCarthy’s growing role has been a pleasant surprise for
immigration reformers who are already worried about the prominent role in
the amnesty dispute being played by GOP Sen. John Cornyn.
Cornyn and McCarthy are the two GOP leaders who have been planning
negotiations on amnesty with top Democrats, Sen. Dick Durbin and Rep. Steny
Hoyer. The pair of Coryn and McCarthy has overshadowed the role played by
leading GOP immigration experts, including Sen. Chuck Grassley and Rep.
Bob Goodlatte, who chair the Senate and House judiciary committees.
McCarthy represents an agricultural district where there is
intense business pressure for imported cheap labor, despite the growing variety
of labor-saving agricultural machinery. He is based in California, where
massive legal and illegal immigration has also allowed Democrats to grab
complete domination of state politics — and the ability every ten years to
reshape political districts to their advantage. Both those political
factors pressure McCarthy away from embracing the populist demand for a
low-immigration/high-wage national economic policy.
But McCarthy stunned immigration reformers at the January 9 White
House meeting when Democratic Sen. Diane Feinstein asked Trump to endorse a
quick, no-strings ‘DACA’ amnesty while postponing border security measures to a
subsequent debate. McCarthy intervened, saying:
Let’s be honest. Security was voted on just a few years ago,
and, no disrespect, there’s people in the room on the other side of the aisle
who voted for it. If I recall, Senator [Hillary] Clinton voted for
it. So I don’t think that’s comprehensive; I think that’s dealing with
DACA at the same time. I think that’s really what the President is
making. It’s kind of like three pillars: DACA, because we’re all in the room
want to do it; border security, so we’re not back out here; and chain
migration. It’s just three items … And the [visa] lottery.
“That blew me away,” said Rosemary Jenks, director of government
relations at NumbersUSA.com.
“I was impressed,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the
Center for Immigration Studies. “It led me to hope that Republicans had come to
an agreement among themselves for what have to be the minimum requirements for
a deal to give the DACAs amnesty,” Vaughan said.
McCarthy also attended the January 12 White House meeting
when Trump forcefully rejected the amnesty-plus deal offered by Durbin and GOP
Sen. Lindsey Graham. The deal offered amnesty to a population of up to 3.25
million young illegals plus the parents who brought the young illegals into the
United States, without offering any significant reform of chain-migration rules
and the visa lottery.
“At the meeting yesterday when he saw what the proposal from the
Senate was I think that only helps him to understand what happens in these
negotiations,” said Labrador. He continued:
What happens in these negotiations is that Democratic senators
and moderate Republicans get together and they think they can do some weak bill
… [but] that is just not going to fly in the Republican House.
McCarthy also understands that the GOP caucus in
the House chooses its leadership based on their
ability to handle the immigration issue, said Labrador.
The reality is that McCarthy — just like [House Speaker] Paul
Ryan — understands the volatility of the issue. Remember, this was one of the
issues that brought down [House Speaker] John Boehner …
Boehner started moving further and further to the left on immigration and that is when people started realizing it was time
for a change of leadership. So I’m very optimistic that Paul Ryan and Kevin
McCarthy know that this is an issue that could do them in.
Polls show that Trump’s American-first immigration
policy is very popular. For example, a December poll of
likely 2018 voters shows two-to-one voter support for Trump’s pro-American
immigration policies, and a lopsided four-to-one opposition against the
cheap-labor, mass-immigration, economic policy pushed by bipartisan
establishment-backed D.C. interest-groups.
Business groups and Democrats tout the misleading,
industry-funded “Nation of Immigrants” polls
which pressure Americans to say they welcome migrants, including the roughly
670,000 ‘DACA’ illegals and the roughly 3.25 million ‘dreamer’ illegals.
The alternative “priority or fairness”
polls — plus the 2016 election — show that voters in the polling booth
put a much higher priority on helping their families, neighbors,
and fellow nationals get decent jobs in a high-tech, high-immigration, low-wage economy.
Four million Americans turn 18 each year
and begin looking for good jobs in the free market.
But the federal government inflates the
supply of new labor by annually accepting 1 million new legal immigrants,
by providing work-permits to roughly 3 million resident foreigners, and by
doing little to block the employment of roughly 8 million illegal immigrants.
The Washington-imposed economic policy of
economic growth via mass-immigration floods the market with foreign
labor, spikes
profits and Wall Street values by cutting
salaries for manual and skilled labor offered
by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real
estate prices, widens
wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech
investment, increases state and
local tax burdens, hurts kids’
schools and college
education, pushes Americans away from
high-tech careers, and sidelines at
least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now
struggling with opioid
addictions.
The cheap-labor policy has also reduced
investment and job creation in many interior states because the coastal cities
have a surplus of imported labor. For example, almost 27 percent of zip codes
in Missouri had fewer jobs or businesses in 2015 than in 2000, according to a
new report by the Economic Innovation Group. In Kansas, almost 29 percent of zip codes had fewer jobs and businesses
in 2015 compared to 2000, which was a two-decade period of massive cheap-labor
immigration.
Because of the successful cheap-labor
strategy, wages for men have remained flat since 1973, and
a large percentage of the nation’s annual income has shifted to investors and
away from employees.
|
|
TRUMP'S PROMISE TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, MEXICO, THE MEX FASCIST
PARTY of LA RAZA AND EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS:
1.) NO (real) WALL
2.) NO (real) ENFORCEMENT
3.) NO CUTS IN WELFARE TO THE INVADERS
4.) NO (real) PROSECUTION OF THE MILLIONS OF EMPLOYERS OF
ILLEGALS
VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY? TAKE A LOOK AT MEXIFORNIA AND SEE FOR
YOURSELF!
No comments:
Post a Comment