When Biden took office, one of his first acts was the elimination of our border security. Like a power-hungry dictator, Biden simply decided to ignore our immigration laws. His catastrophic border policy resulted in untold millions of unidentified foreign citizens from around the world pouring into our country. Its impact is now being felt in cities across the country. The worst is yet to come. PETER LEMISKA - AND WE'RE ALREADY THERE!!!
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
JAZZ SHAW - ENDORSED BY NARCOMEX, KAMALA HARRIS RUNS FOR PRESIDENT ON THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY & WELFARE OPEN BORDERS PLATFORM
Is
Kamala Harris Running For President Already? You Betcha
There are still
many months and many miles of campaign trail to go before the midterms, but
much like the Republicans in 2010, it’s not too soon for the Democrats to begin
ginning up their base for the presidential primary to come. Assuming that
Donald Trump doesn’t find some way to boost his popularity up out of negative
territory, the Democrats feel that he should be easy pickings. (Much as they thought
in 2016.) Today, The Hill looks at one
of the least surprising names we expect to see in that contest and one who is
making little effort to hide her nascent POTUS ambitions. That would be
California Senator Kamala Harris.
Sen. Kamala Harris is increasingly positioning herself for a
what is expected to be a crowded Democratic primary for the White House in
2020.
The former
California attorney general, who is just at the beginning of her second year in
the Senate, is taking positions that could endear herself with the Democratic
base while allowing her to stand out from a group of Democrats who might seek
the progressive mantle.
Harris voted
against a Senate immigration bill backed by centrists from both parties earlier
this month, waiting until the last minute to break with other liberals such as
Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who both backed
the measure.
“While this bill would put
Dreamers on a pathway toward citizenship, the appropriation of $25 billion for
a border wall is a waste of taxpayer money,” she said. “A wall will not secure
our border and I remain concerned those billions of dollars may also be used to
implement this Administration’s anti-immigrant agenda — one that targets
California and its residents.”
The signs are all
there. Harris is practically tripping over herself to rush to a television
camera every time there’s an opportunity to criticize President Trump and doing
so in the loudest, most extreme way possible. And when it comes to the current
gun control debate, when she’s not going after Trump she’s describing the NRA
as the essence of all evil in the world. You may recall when she quickly got on
MSNBC after the Florida shooting to say, “We cannot tolerate a society and live
in a country with any level of pride when our babies are being slaughtered.”
(Insert here your brief reminder that Harris is fiercely pro-abortion.)
Harris
is making use of a natural advantage she has which may serve her well with much
of the base now but could spell serious trouble later on. The younger and
louder elements of the party don’t want the same old, middle ground politics of
the Democratic Party of their parents. They want some far, far left red meat
served up in blistering hot takes. Repeal the Second Amendment, open borders…
all that socialist goodness. Coming from California, Harris is in no danger of
ticking off her own voters acting this way.
But what many of
these new, younger liberals seem to fail to realize is that hers is an act
which plays well in California, New York City and a couple of other cities… but
not so well everywhere else. If you run screaming too far to the left you won’t
even be able to carry your primary voters in a lot of flyover country or in the
south. And even if you do manage to squeak out a primary win with a platform
like that, you’re going to run into a brick wall in the general election.
That’s probably exactly the sort of candidate that Donald Trump dreams of
running against. (Whereas a Joe Biden candidacy likely keeps him awake at
night, though he’d never admit it.)
The other factor
to consider is that Harris brings with her the same “closet” problem that
Barack Obama had and it showed up constantly after he was elected. She may talk
a good game, but when it comes to executive or even legislative experience, she’s
pretty much an empty suit. She worked in the law enforcement end of
things (an admirable and important job) for most of her career before even
running for Attorney General (still not an executive or legislative role) eight
years ago. She’s only been in the Senate for one year and two months. Her
governing experience is almost nil, though her legislative experience isn’t all
that much greater.
Do the Democrats
really want to try to elect another candidate who can give a good speech but
brings nothing much to the table in terms of proven experience? If so, best of
luck to them. EXCLUSIVE: Michael Savage Unveils Platform for Possible California Senate Run: Borders, Language, Culture
NEW YORK — As Michael Savage contemplates a run for the U.S. Senate in California, the radio star on Monday unveiled a platform of borders, language and culture.
In an email to Breitbart News, Savage outlined his plan for the Golden State if he decides to jump into the race:
Seal the borders, build the wall like a citadel, deport illegal aliens.
English is the only language permitted on government documents, including ballots used for voting. Again: English only voting
Fix the homeless problem in the big cities of California – get rid of the needles, feces and trash off the streets.
Bring the state taxes of California down to 9%.
No more racism as a way of life among the political class.
Be strong on the environment.
On his national program on Friday, “The Savage Nation” host said he was asked by “some very important people” to run as an independent against Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Listen to the audio here:
Savage told his audience: “Some very important people have come to me and said ‘Savage, would you like to run as an independent for the U.S. Senate in the of California against the esteemed Dianne Feinstein?’”
“Now you may say ‘you don’t have a ghost of a chance.’ With all those illegal aliens, with all that union money, with no press on your side, how could you David run against the Goliath of Feinstein? […] I’ve been holding down the fort for 24 years this March. 24 years in the radio business and I am younger than Dianne Feinstein.
“That’s right. I’ve been asked by a number of very powerful, important people to run as an independent for the U.S. Senate in the state of California and I am contemplating whether I really want to leave what I’ve worked for all my life and roll in the mud because politics is the dirtiest business on the planet.”
Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him onTwitter @AaronKleinShow.Follow him onFacebook.
JOHN BINDER
CALIFORNIA MOVES CLOSER TO FINAL ANNEXATION BY MEXICO
DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP PER LA RAZA:
NO TEST, NO BACKGROUND CHECKS ON CRIMINALITY, NO BACK TAXES, NO
FINES.... JUST JUMP STRAIGHT TO VOTING BOOTHS! AND VOTE OFTEN!!!
In 2013, California lawmakers passed legislation that allowed illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses if they can prove to the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) their identity and state residency. The plan was one of the largest victories to date by the open borders lobby.… JOHN BINDER – BREITBART.com
THE MURDEROUS MEXICANS….
Everyday there are 12 Americans murdered and 8 children molested by Mexicans!
Steinle’s murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
"While walking with her father on a pier in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s arms."
Adios, California A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse. By Steve Baldwin American Spectator, October 19, 2017 What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs. Liberals claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true. It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6 billion, or at least $1,800 per household. Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming. Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.
"If the racist "Sensenbrenner Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually labor union power can merge with the immigrant civil rights and "Immigrant Sanctuary" movements to enable us to either form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing Democratic Party. The next and final steps would follow and that is to elect our own governors of all the states within Aztlan." Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.
THE ENDLESSLY HISPANDERING DEMOCRAT PARTY funded by Wall Street’s biggest criminals says it is “ALL NEW”…. Meaning open borders to keep wages depressed and no regulation of plundering banks!
There was a time when this would have seemed remarkable, but since we’re talking about California in 2018 it’s probably par for the course. The Democratic Mayor of Oakland, California, Libby Schaaf, sent out a public warning this weekend which was supposedly designed to “protect the residents” of her city. Only this particular public service announcement wasn’t intended for all of Oakland’s residents. It was only applicable to the illegal aliens residing there.
She was warning them of “credible information” she had received, indicating that the next big ICE sweep would be targeting illegals in her city. She was not seeking to induce any sort of “panic” there, mind you. She just wanted to keep people safe. (Fox News)
The mayor of a sanctuary city in California issued a warning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could be conducting a raid in the area as soon as Sunday — ratcheting up tension with the feds while giving her constituents an early heads-up.
Libby Schaaf, the Democratic mayor of Oakland, shared the warning — which she said she “learned from multiple credible sources” — in a press release on Saturday, “not to panic our residents but to protect them,” Fox 2 reported.
The mayor said she didn’t know further details of the ICE operation, but claimed she felt it was her “duty and moral obligation as Mayor to give those families fair warning when that threat appears imminent.”
Here’s the thing. When you’re an elected official and you warn people about a flu epidemic, a wildfire approaching the city or a water main break, you’re responsibly protecting your residents. When you warn a criminal that law enforcement is coming for them you’re engaged in something known as “harboring.” (Specifically, to clandestinely shelter, succor, and protect improperly admitted Aliens.)
Is this some sort of general guideline or suggestion? No. It’s actually embedded in federal law and has been for as long as anyone reading this has been alive. Here’s how it’s structured, courtesy of the Cornell Law School.
8 U.S. Code § 1324 (a) (1) (A) (iii)
Any person who, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
8 U.S. Code § 1324 (a) (1) (B) (ii)
A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
Do we really need to say much more than this? The White House has shown no hesitation in pursuing a termination of federal funding for cities engaging in this behavior. The President seems to be a big fan of the idea of “lock them up” when it comes to such violations. Why is the Mayor of Oakland exempt from this law?
Not to mention the fact that this isn’t some average citizen we’re talking about. This is the chief executive of a major city who was elected and took an oath to uphold the law. Rather than doing so, she is actively thwarting the efforts of federal law enforcement officials. Clearly, the legislators and the general populace of Oakland would have no interest in removing her from office, but she’s certainly not immune from federal prosecution. Nobody is. It’s simply insane that we’re now living in a society where such a thing has been normalized.
No comments:
Post a Comment