Tuesday, February 27, 2018

OPIOIDS - IS BIG PHARMA KEEPING AMERICAN ADDICTED FOR BIGGER PROFIT MARGINS?

 The Washington-imposed economic policy of mass-immigration floods the market with foreign labor and spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions. NEIL MUNRO

US Senate report details funding of patient advocacy groups by opioid manufacturers

By Brian Dixon 

Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill issued a report last week exposing the financial connections between the major opioid manufacturers and ostensibly independent patient advocacy groups.
The report, which is the outcome of a nearly year-long investigation, was released amidst the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States where more than 600,000 people died from drug overdoses between 2000 and 2016, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In 2016 alone, over 42,000 Americans died from opioid drug overdoses, 40 percent of which involved prescription painkillers. In other words, on average 115 Americans die every day from opioid overdoses.
Based on disclosures by the manufacturers of the five major opioid products—Purdue Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Mylan, Depomed and Insys Therapeutics—made in response to requests by McCaskill, the report found that these companies donated nearly $9 million to 14 patient advocacy groups between 2012 and 2017. These companies paid doctors affiliated with these groups an additional $1.6 million, bringing their total funding to over $10 million.
The report did not include information on other major opioid manufacturers, such as Allergan, Pfizer, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Endo Health Solutions.
Purdue Pharma, maker of the painkiller Oxycontin, gave the greatest amount to these organizations, totaling $4,153,554. Insys Therapeutics, maker of the fentanyl product Subsys, gave more than $3 million. Both companies are known for aggressively and deceptively promoting their highly addictive products to doctors.
Not surprisingly, these patient advocacy organizations, whose policy positions are given more credibility since they are supposedly independent of drug companies, favorably promoted the treatment of pain with opioids. Only a handful of advocacy organizations working on pain-related issues do not accept donations from the drug industry.
“These groups,” notes the report’s executive summary, “have issued guidelines and policies minimizing the risk of opioid addiction and promoting opioids for chronic pain, lobbied to change laws directed at curbing opioid use, and argued against accountability for physicians and industry executives responsible for overprescription and misbranding.”
Opioid manufacturers are interested in these groups because advocacy organizations can influence health policies that impact the drug industry. According to the report, they “play a significant role in shaping health policy debates, setting national guidelines for patient treatment, raising disease awareness, and educating the public.”
However, the financial relationships between the drug companies and advocacy organizations are not always transparent.
For example, one study published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year and cited by the report found that at least 83 percent of the 104 organizations examined received industry funding and 39 percent included a former drug industry executive on their board, but only 57 percent disclosed donation amounts (often given in ranges, rather than exact figures).
Similarly, a study published last year in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that while 67 percent of the 245 organizations it looked at received industry funding—12 percent received more than half their funding from industry—only 65 percent of the organizations released information on their funding from for-profit sources. Moreover, 8 percent of the respondents “reported [that] pressure to conform their organizations’ positions to the interests of industry funders is of concern.”
Among those patient advocacy groups receiving the most funding from opioid manufacturers were the Academy of Integrative Pain Management, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the American Chronic Pain Association and the American Geriatrics Society.
Around 30 percent of the total contributions made by the major opioid manufacturers, and the largest donation category, went towards restricted grants that specify the use of their money. Non-education grants—despite the name of the category, these funds are used for initiatives related to patient and public education and scientific research—constituted 26 percent of all donations, followed by payments for advertising (18 percent) and sponsorship (14 percent).
The report also detailed payments from the opioid companies to physicians affiliated with these advocacy organizations totaling over $1.6 million. For example, based on data from CMS open payments, between 2013 and 2016 Dr. Steven Stanos of the American Academy of Pain Medicine received over $90,000 in payments, while Dr. Charles Argoff, president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine Foundation, received over $600,000.
The report notes that these groups, financially supported by opioid manufacturers, “amplified or issued messages that reinforce industry efforts to promote opioid prescription and use, including guidelines and policies minimizing the risk of addiction and promoting opioids for chronic pain.”
According to a complaint from the City of Chicago cited by the report, the Academy of Pain and Medicine and the American Pain Society allegedly issued guidelines to physicians in 2009 that promoted opioids as “safe and effective” for chronic pain. That same year, the American Geriatrics Society issued guidelines for patients with persistent pain recommending that they use opioids instead of aspirin or ibuprofen if acetaminophen (Tylenol) proves insufficient.
“It looks pretty damning when these groups were pushing the message about how wonderful opioids are and they were being heavily funded, by the manufacturers of those drugs,” Lewis Nelson, a professor of emergency medicine at Rutgers University and expert on prescription drug misuse, told the Center for Public Integrity after the release of the report.
The advocacy groups also lobbied to defeat legislative measures that would have restricted the over-prescription of opioids and opposed the 2016 guidelines issued by the CDC recommending non-opioid therapies for chronic pain (outside of active cancer treatment and end-of-life care) and generally limiting opioid prescriptions for acute pain to three to seven days.
The report states that these groups registering opposition with the CDC “while receiving funding from the opioids industry raises the appearance—at the very least—of a direct link between corporate donations and the advancement of opioids-friendly messaging.”
This conclusion coincides with that of a 2017 article in JAMA Internal Medicine, which looked at more than 150 organizations that submitted comments to the draft CDC guidelines, and found that “opposition to the guidelines was significantly more common among organizations with funding from opioid manufacturers than those without funding from the life sciences industry.”
Some of the advocacy groups even challenged efforts by the government to hold accountable physicians overprescribing opioids and industry executives engaged in fraudulent marketing.
For example, the National Pain Foundation defended Dr. William Hurwitz after he prescribed excessive amounts of oxycodone, up to 1,600 pills in one day: “The conviction [in the trial court] broke ground by holding that a doctor acting in the good faith belief that he was serving the best medical interest of his patient could be found to be a drug dealer.”
The report concludes by quoting from a 2011 study in the American Journal of Public Health that “a tension exists between the status of advocacy organizations as ‘among the most influential and trusted stakeholders in U.S. health policy,’ and the reality that their ‘positions closely correspond to the marketing aims of pharmaceutical and device companies.’”

OBAMA AND HIS CRONIES IN BIG PHARMA AT WORK!

AMERICA’S SUICIDE:


PATHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE, OPIOID 

ADDICTION, STAGGERING POVERTY, 

SOARING JOBLESSNESS FOR LEGALS 

AND POVERTY FOR ALL….. While the rich 

only get SUPER RICH!


PRINCETON REPORT:

American middle-class is addicted, poor, jobless and suicidal…. Thank the corrupt government for surrendering our borders to 40 million looting Mexicans and then handing the bills to middle America?


 WALL STREET TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: DIE YOUNG… your company pension dies with you!


OPIOID AND ALCOHOL ADDICTION KILLS OF MIDDLE AMERICA


SOARING POVERTY AND DRUG ADDICTION UNDER OBAMA
"These figures present a scathing indictment of the social order that prevails in America, the world’s wealthiest country, whose government proclaims itself to be the globe’s leading democracy. They are just one manifestation of the human toll taken by the vast and all-pervasive inequality and mass poverty. 

 AMERICA UNRAVELS:

Millions of children go hungry as the super- rich gorge themselves and ILLEGALS SUCK IN BILLIONS IN WELFARE!

"The top 10 percent of Americans now own roughly three-quarters of all household wealth."

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/america-unravels-millions-of-children.html

"While telling workers there is “not enough money” for wage increases, or to fund social programs, both parties hailed the recent construction of the U.S.S. Gerald Ford, a massive aircraft carrier that cost $13 billion to build, stuffing the pockets of numerous contractors and war profiteers."


Unclaimed bodies pile up as opioid overdose death rates soar and burial costs overwhelm the government

 

·         In 15 states, the government sets aside money to cover the cost of cremating and burying the deceased who left no assets behind 
·         Other states push the financial burden down to the local level 
·         A 2004 report estimated that there are 40,000 unclaimed bodies stored in morgues across the US, and experts say that number has risen in recent years
·         More than 115 people die from opioid overdoses each day
·         The most affected populations are those in lower income groups who are less likely to leave money behind to cover burial costs 
·         Hundreds of unclaimed remains are stored in the basement of a funeral home in Worcester, Massachusetts, some dating back to the 1800s

Unclaimed bodies are piling up across the US as state and local governments struggle to keep up with payments to the funeral homes that spend thousands to bury them.
A 2004 report estimated that there are 40,000 unclaimed bodies stored in morgues across the US, and experts say that number has risen dramatically in recent years in part due to the opioid crisis. 
More than 115 people die from opioid overdoses each day, and the most affected populations are those in lower income groups who are less likely to leave money behind to cover burial costs.  
Funeral homes across the US have been overwhelmed by the number of bodies that need to be taken care of as they shoulder the cost and wait for government reimbursement.
+8
·          
Peter Stefan, pictured, is the funeral director at a home in Worcester, Massachusetts, that handles dozens of unclaimed bodies each year. He is pictured in the basement where several of the bodies are stored
+8
·          
In Massachusetts, funeral directors are paid $1,110 for each unclaimed body buried. The money is intended to cover the cost of labor, the casket, corpse transportation and burial plot
'These are human beings, someone's mother, father, sister, brother,' Peter Stefan, a funeral director who buries dozens of unclaimed bodies a year in central Massachusetts, said. 
'What do you do with these people? If I leave this place this way, the poor won't have too many options.'
In 15 states, the government sets aside money each year to cover the cost of cremating and burying the deceased who left no assets behind. Other states push the financial burden down to the local level. 
The number of bodies that require government funding has grown as the opioid epidemic - which claimed the lives of more than 64,000 last year - worsens.
Opiates are now the leading cause of death for adults under 50.  
In West Virginia, drug overdose victims have used up nearly all the state government money budgeted for the unclaimed dead.
West Virginia has the highest rate of opioid deaths in the country, accounting for 52 per 100,000.
The state saw a 25 percent increase in opioid-related deaths from 2015 to 2016.
According to executive director of the state funeral directors association Robert Kimes, homes that bury the indigent and unclaimed from March on will have to try to recoup money from the state later, but there's no guarantee that they will be paid back.
Lawmakers are considering lowering the payment from $1,250 to $1,000 to make the fund last longer, Kimes said.
In Massachusetts, a dwindling number of funeral homes are willing to shoulder the cost of cremation or burial of unclaimed bodies because the state has failed to keep up with reimbursements.
Funeral directors in the state are reimbursed $1,110 for each unclaimed body buried.
That payment, which is intended to cover the cost of labor, the casket, transportation of the corpse and burial plot, hasn't risen in 35 years despite an estimated 150 percent inflation rate in that period.
Many funeral directors have said the actual cost of burying an unclaimed body is double what the government pays them.
Cremation is a cheaper option for disposing of unclaimed bodies, but it is only possible if a family member signs off. On average, cremation costs about one third of what burial does.
Hundreds of cremated remains of unclaimed bodies are stores in the basement of Stefan's funeral home, some dating back to the 1800s
Stefan said that Massachusetts lawmakers should require local health boards to approve cremation when relatives don't come forward within 30 days.
He and his supporters, including Democratic state Senate President Harriette Chandler, say they believe it would make more funeral homes willing to help out with abandoned bodies.
Directors recently became eligible for an extra $1,000 if they accept bodies from the Massachusetts medical examiner's office, which investigates suicides and suspicious and accidental deaths, but that accounts only for some bodies.
Robert Lawler, director of a funeral home in Boston that buries about 100 bodies each year, said:
'As long as you have two or three funeral homes that are willing to do this, it's not a problem. But what happens when we decide we can't do it anymore?'
Stefan arranged the burial of Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev, is often the go-to funeral director for police, nursing homes and hospitals.
+8
·          
Employees at a funeral home in Massachusetts lower a casket containing the body of James Oram, 82, into the ground.  Oram died in a nursing home and his body was left unclaimed
+8
·          
 Stefan eventually discovered that Oram died with about $2,000, money that paid for his burial instead of the state
Stefan recounted the details of when a man named James Oram, 82, arrived at his funeral home in Worcester hours after dying at a nursing home in January.
Oram's body spent about a month in an unfinished basement in a large refrigerator where Stefan can keep three bodies as he looks for relatives, money and burial space. Other bodies are placed in caskets and stored in a room kept cold.
Stefan eventually discovered that Oram died with about $2,000, money that paid for his burial instead of the state.
The basement also holds hundreds of containers of cremated remains that were never picked up by relatives, some of which date to the 1800s.
The state of Ohio used to pay $750 to homes, but has now shifted the burden to local governments.
Today some communities offer a set fee, while some smaller towns often won't budget for it and funeral directors have to fight to just get paid $350, according to Scott Gilligan, general counsel for the National Funeral Directors Association.
'A lot of times, they just do it as good citizens,' Gilligan said.
In Georgia the costs are also handled on the local level.
Floyd County coroner Gene Proctor said he handled about 90 unclaimed sets of remains last year.
Last year he had to call five or six funeral homes every time he had an unclaimed body before he could find one willing to bury it for the $1,250 the county provided, he said.
'I couldn't blame them because ... they're a business and they have to make money to survive, and here I am asking them to cost themselves money,' he said.
The county recently passed an ordinance that allows cremation of the unclaimed and pays $750, which Proctor said has made a big impact.
+8
·          
+8
·          
Oram's body is carted out of the home by funeral director Paul St Germaine and driver Richard Derosiers and placed into the hearse so it can be taken to the cemetery
+8
·          
Stefan puts on a tie before heading out to the cemetery for Oram's burial on February 1, 2018
+8
·          
St. Germaine draws a cross in the dirt over Oram's grave directly after the ca

No comments: