AMERICANS (Legals) are one paycheck and 12 illegals away from being homeless!
"The US jobs report for November,
released Friday, provides
further evidence that the much vaunted economic “recovery”
in the United States has overwhelmingly benefited Wall
Street, whose stock bonanza is based above all on stagnant
wages and the destruction of working-class living standards."
Majorities Say
Government Does
Too Little for Older
People, the Poor and
the Middle Class
Partisan, age gaps in views of government help for younger people
Majorities of Americans say the federal government does not provide enough help for older people (65%), poor people (62%) and the middle class (61%). By contrast, nearly two-thirds (64%) say the government provides too much help for wealthy people.
Opinions are more divided about the amount of help the government provides for younger people: About half (51%) say the government does not do enough for younger people, 29% say the government provides about the right amount of help, while 13% say it provides too much.
The national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted Jan. 10-15 among 1,503 adults, finds that views on government help for the poor, the middle class and the wealthy – as well as for older people – have changed little in recent years. This is the first time this series has included a question about younger people.
There are partisan differences in views of government support for all groups included in the survey. However, the gap is somewhat narrower in views of government help for older people than for other groups. While 73% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say the federal government does not do enough for older people, a smaller majority of Republicans (58%) say the same.
The partisan gap is much wider in views of government help for younger people. Nearly seven-in-ten Democrats (69%) say the federal government does not provide enough help for younger people. Republicans are divided: Nearly equal shares say the government does too little (29%) and too much (27%) for younger people, while 36% say it provides about the right amount of help.
In addition, there are sizable age differences in views of government help for younger people – but not in how much the government does for older people. A majority of those younger than 50 (58%) say the government does not do enough for younger people, compared with 44% of those 50 and older. Nearly identical shares of those under 50 (65%) and those 50 and older (66%) say the federal government does not do enough for older people.
Views of government help for poor, wealthy, middle class
The partisan divide in views of government aid for the poor is wider than for other groups. Fully 82% of Democrats say the federal government does not provide enough help for poor people, compared with just 36% of Republicans. About as many Republicans say the government does too much for the poor (33%) as say it does too little; 27% say the help the government provides is about right.
Pew Research Center’s recent report on the public’s political values found that partisan differences in attitudes about aid to the poor and needy have widened considerably over the past two decades. In that study, 71% of Democrats said the government should do more to help the needy even if it meant going deeper in debt, compared with 24% of Republicans.
Democrats and Republicans also differ in their attitudes about the help the government provides to wealthy people. A large majority of Democrats (77%) say the federal government provides too much help to the wealthy. As with views about government help to the poor, Republicans are divided. Nearly half of Republicans (46%) say the federal government provides too much help for wealthy people, 42% say it provides about the right amount, while 6% say it does not provide enough help.
Partisan differences in opinions about the federal government’s help for the middle class are not as pronounced. Seven-in-ten Democrats say the government does not provide enough help for the middle class, compared with about half of Republicans (51%).
Republican attitudes about government help to the poor, middle class and wealthy differ significantly by family income. Democratic opinions vary much less across income levels.
Nearly half of Republicans with incomes under $40,000 (47%) say that the government does not provide enough assistance for poor people. This is considerably higher than those who make between $40,000 and $75,000 or $75,000 or more; only about three-in-ten in these income brackets say that poor people do not receive enough assistance (32% and 28%, respectively).
A similar pattern is seen on opinions about government help for the middle class. A majority (59%) of lower-income Republicans say the middle class does not receive enough help. That compares with about half of Republicans with higher family incomes.
And while 58% of Republicans with incomes of less than $40,000 say the government provides too much help to wealthy people, only about four-in-ten (41%) of those with incomes of $40,000 or more say the same.
Large majorities of Democrats across income categories say the federal government does not provide enough help for the poor and middle class, and that it provides too much help for the wealthy.
THEIR
BILLION DOLLAR WELFARE STATE ON OUR BACKS!!!
70% OF
ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!
“According to the Centers for Immigration
Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some
type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
So when cities across the country declare that they will NOT be
sanctuary, guess where ALL the illegals, criminals, gang members fleeing ICE
will go???? straight to your welcoming city. So ironically the people fighting
for sanctuary city status, may have an unprecedented crime wave to deal with
along with the additional expense.
*
$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the
American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
*
$12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary
school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word
of English.
*
$22 billion is spent on (AFDC) welfare to illegal aliens each
year.
*
$2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs
such as (SNAP) food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal
aliens.
*
$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Does
not include local jails and State Prisons.
*
2012 illegal aliens sent home $62 BILLION in remittances back to
their countries of origin. This is why Mexico is getting involved in
our politics.
*
$200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are
caused by the illegal aliens.
*
Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In
The United States.
"If
the racist "Sensenbrenner Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is
no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually
labor union power can merge with the immigrant civil rights
and "Immigrant Sanctuary" movements to enable us to either
form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing
Democratic Party. The next and final steps would follow and that is to elect
our own governors of all the states within Aztlan."
THE STAGGERING COST OF THE WELFARE STATE MEXICO
AND THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE BUILT BORDER to OPEN BORDER’
According to the Federation
for American Immigration Reform’s 2017 report, illegal
immigrants, and their children, cost American taxpayers a net $116 billion
annually -- roughly $7,000 per alien annually. While high, this number is not
an outlier: a recent study by the Heritage
Foundation found that low-skilled immigrants (including those here
illegally) cost Americans trillions over
the course of their lifetimes, and a study from the National
Economics Editorial found that illegal immigration costs America over $140
billion annually. As it stands, illegal immigrants are a massive burden on
American taxpayers.
POPULATION EXPLOSION FOR GRINGO WELFARE
THE HORDES OF ILLEGALS KEEP COMING…. Despite
America’s jobs, housing and Mexican crime tidal wave.
"If
the racist "Sensenbrenner Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is
no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually
labor union power can merge with the immigrant civil rights
and "Immigrant Sanctuary" movements to enable us to either
form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing Democratic
Party. The next and final steps would follow and that is to elect our own
governors of all the states within Aztlan."
LA made
$1.3B in illegal immigrant welfare payouts in just 2 years
TRUMP’S SECRET
AMNESTY, WIDER OPEN BORDERS DOCTRINE TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
"During the same month that Schlafly had backed Trump for his “America First” agenda, Nielsen’s committee released an ideologically-globalist report, promoting the European migrant crisis as a win for big business who would profit greatly from a never-ending stream of cheap, foreign migrants."
AMERICA: ONE PAYCHECK AND TWELVE
ILLEGALS AWAY FROM HOMELESSNESS!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/rick-moran-los-angeles-mexicos-second.html
A dashcam video of downtown Los Angeles on
Christmas day reveals a stunning sight: hundreds of tents and lean-tos on the
sidewalks that serve as shelter for the homeless. The scene is reminiscent of a
third-world country. RICK MORAN / AMERICANTHINKER
com
HOMELESS CRISIS IN LOS ANGELES,
MEXICO’S SECOND LARGEST
CITY, WORSENS BY THE DAY…. Approximates the great depression
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/11/homeless-crisis-in-mexicos-second.html
93% of the murders in Los Angeles are by
Mexicans
HOMELESS AMERICA’S HOUSING CRISIS as 40
million illegals have climbed U.S. open borders.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/homeless-in-america-hundreds-of.html
EVERY AMERICAN (Legal) only one paycheck and
two illegals away from living in their cars.
Drug Rehab Centers are
Fueling Homeless Epidemic
in California
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/12/19/drug-rehab-centers-are-fueling-homelessness-in-california/
Getty Images
Drug rehabilitation or “rehab” centers are increasingly being seen
as a contributing factor in the homeless epidemic that has swept across
the Golden State.
“There’s
evidence to suggest a portion of the growth [of homelessness] in some Orange
County cities, and to a lesser degree in Los Angeles, can be attributed to the
rehab industry’s aggressive recruitment of addicts – and their lucrative
insurance payments – from around the country,” the Orange
County Register noted in a recent article.
The issue rests in the fact that the drug rehab centers’
business models actually wind up leaving addicts stranded on the streets. The
rehab model is also highly lucrative, bringing in hundreds of thousands to
millions of dollars per year.
Often, once a patient’s insurance money runs out, rehab homes
and facilities will kick him or her out on the street, which results in
relapse and, often, homelessness.
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, over 60
percent of people who receive drug rehabilitation will relapse. Many of these
individuals wind up homeless.
The
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependency estimates that over 23 million Americans (age 12 and older)
are addicted to alcohol and other drugs. According to the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), just under 11% (2.5
million)
received care at an addiction treatment facility in 2012. SAMHSA also estimates
that the market for addiction treatment is about $35 billion per year.
According to Los Angeles County’s annual homeless count, the
region’s homeless population has grown 23 percent since 2016. The study
also found that the number of homeless people in L.A. County whose last
residence was out of state increased by 21 percent.
The Register points out that in
Florida, there is a strong link between rehab and drug-treatment facilities and
homelessness, and particularly in Palm Beach County, where government
counts reportedly found a 73 percent increase over the past two years in the
number of homeless youth between the ages of 18 and 24.
“The (rehab
patients) are not going back home to the Northeast,” Palm Beach County State
Attorney Dave Aronberg, who leads the county’s Sober Home Task Force, told
the Register. “The
incentives are too great to remain here: the free rent, the free
transportation, the lifestyle. They’ve set up these individuals for failure.”
Adelle
Nazarian is a politics and national security reporter for Breitbart News.
Follow her on Facebook and Twitter.
RVs Become Only Housing
Option for Many in
Unaffordable San Francisco
Housing prices and the homeless epidemic in Northern California are two
factors that have contributed to what is being described as a “crisis” in which
trailers and recreational vehicles (RVs) have become the only viable option for
residents of the Bay Area.
“We’ve never
seen it like this,” Tom Myers, executive director of Community Services Agency
of Mountain View, told the San Jose Mercury News. “We have to be prepared
that this will be the new normal for us. It’s a crisis.” According to the
publication, San Francisco averages more than three complaints a day about RV
communities.
“I
have to do whatever I have to do,” Robert Ramirez, 54, who lives on lives on
government assistance and collecting recyclable items, told the Mercury News. He has been living
in his RV for six months. He is currently in San Jose but will likely be asked
to move in a short amount of time.
The
median cost of a two-bedroom apartment is approximately $2,500 in San Jose and
$2,200 in Oakland.
RV
residents, while they do not consider themselves homeless, are reportedly often
included in overall homeless counts. Since 2015, the number of homeless people
has jumped to nearly 40 percent.
The
stretch along South 7th Street in San Jose has become an RV haven for people
who cannot afford the city’s skyrocketing rents.
During
her annual State of the City address last month, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf
called on her constituents to open their doors and residences to the city’s
homeless. “Give up that Airbnb. Fix up that back unit,” Schaff reportedly said.
In
2015, SF Weekly noted: “Although it’s illegal to
inhabit a vehicle in San Francisco between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., police rarely
enforce that law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment