AMERICA’S ROAD TO REVOLUTION:
THE BANKSTER REGIME WILL BE TOPPLED AND
MEXICO PUSHED OUT OF AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS!
"The
report was drafted in conjunction with a survey conducted among nearly 1,000
banking and business executives, government officials and academics, which
found that 93 percent of them feared a worsening of confrontations between the
major powers in 2018. Fully 79 percent foresaw a heightened threat of a major
“state-on-state” military conflict."
"The report was drafted in conjunction with a survey conducted among nearly 1,000 banking and business executives, government officials and academics, which found that 93 percent of them feared a worsening of confrontations between the major powers in 2018. Fully 79 percent foresaw a heightened threat of a major “state-on-state” military conflict."
Democrats Would Lose the Second Civil War, Too
It’s
obvious that the central tenet of the Democrat Party platform is now hatred and
contempt for Normal Americans. Taking their cue from the elites in Europe and
Canada who are stripping dissenters of their free speech rights and religious
freedoms, the leftist elite is moving to solidify its hold on power here with
the eager assistance of tech companies and the moral support of the Fredocons who yearn to return to
pseudo-relevance as the ruling class’s slobberingly loyal opposition. In
California, the leftist government is practically firing on Fort Sumter. And
nationally, these aspiring fascists are especially eager to disarm Normal
Americans – doing so would be an object lesson in who’s the boss, as well as
solving that frustrating problem of the Normals having the ability to resist.
Probably because I’ve spent time where they actually had a civil
war, many people ask me – people whose names you know – whether I think this
turmoil will all end in a Second Civil War. They are seriously concerned, and
not without cause – the left’s hatred for Normal Americans and its dedication
to totally stripping the people who are the backbone of this country of their
ability to participate in their own governance is threatening to rip the
country apart.
Do I think there will be a civil war? No, but there could be.
This is the Age of Black Swans, and anything is possible – we could easily see
the country split into red and blue. Civil war is unlikely, but
never underestimate Democrat stupidity and hatred. The Schlichter family
learned that lesson a century and half ago, the last time the Democrats decided
to try to impose their hatred of basic human rights on the rest of the country, when an army of
Democrats burned our family hometown.
Oh,
they paid for it. And they would pay again. Democrats are 0-1 in insurrections,
and if they went for another round, they would be 0-2. It’s a matter of
terrain, numbers, and morale.
Democrats, who think history began when Obama was elected, don’t
understand the dangerous game they are playing when they talk about how they
want to impose their brown shirt vision upon red America. The keyboard
commandos of the left seek to hand wave away the massive strategic challenge of
imposing control by force upon a well-armed, decentralized citizenry occupying
the vast majority of the territory, so they babble about drones and tanks as
counterinsurgency trump cards. But there are no trump cards in war. There are
men, with rifles, standing on patches of dirt, killing the people trying to
push them off. That’s the ugly reality of war. And multiply the usual brutality
of war by ten when it’s a civil war.
There are two Civil War II scenarios, and the left is poorly
positioned to prevail in either one. The first scenario is that the Democrats
take power and violate the Constitution in order to use the apparatus of the
federal government to suppress and oppress Normal Americans. In that scenario,
red Americans are the insurgents. In the second scenario, which we can even now
see the stirrings of in California’s campaign to nullify federal immigration
law, it is the blue states that are the insurgents.
The Democrats lose both wars. Big time.
Let’s talk terrain and numbers. Remember the famous red v. blue voting map? There is a lot of red,
and in the interior the few blue splotches are all cities like Las Vegas or
Denver. That is a lot of territory for a counter-insurgent force to control,
and this is critical. The red is where the food is grown, the oil pumped, and
through which everything is transported. And that red space is filled with
millions of American citizens with small arms, a fairly large percentage of
whom have military training.
Remember what two untrained idiots did in Boston with a couple
of pistols? They shut a city down. Now multiply that by several million, with
better weapons and training.
Let’s look at the counter-insurgent forces in the Democrat
oppression scenario should they attempt to misuse our law enforcement and
military in an unconstitutional manner to take the rights of American citizens.
There are a lot of civilian law enforcement officers, but the vast majority of
the agencies are local – sheriffs, small town police departments. They will not
be reliable allies in supporting unlawful oppression of their friends and
neighbors. The major cities’ police departments are run by Democrat appointees,
so the commands would be loyal. But the rank-and-file? A small percentage would
be ideologically loyal. More would be loyal because that’s their paycheck –
they could be swayed or intimidated to support the rebels. Others would be
actively sympathetic to the insurgents. This is true of federal law enforcement
agencies as well.
And the military? Well, wouldn’t the military just crush any
resistance? Not so fast. The military would have the combat power to win any
major engagement, but insurgents don’t get into major engagements with forces
that have more combat power. They instead leverage their decentralized ability
to strike at the counter-insurgents’ weak points to eliminate the government’s
firepower advantage. In other words, hit and run, and no stand-up fights.
For example, how do a bunch of hunters in Wisconsin defeat a
company of M1A2 Abrams tanks? They ambush the fuel and ammo trucks. Oh, and
they wait until the gunner pops the hatch to take a leak and put a .30-06 round
in his back from 300 meters. Then they disappear. What do the tanks do then? Go
level the nearest town? Great. Now they just moved the needle in favor of the
insurgents among the population. Pretty soon, they can’t be outside of their
armored vehicles in public. Their forces are spending 90% of their efforts not
on actual counter-insurgency operations but on force protection. Sure, they own
their forward operating bases, and they own a few hundred meters around them
wherever they happen to be standing at the moment, but the rest of the
territory is bright red. As my recent novel illustrates, American guerillas
with small arms are a deadly threat to the forces of a dictatorship.
But the military is so big it would overwhelm any rebels, right?
Well, how big do you think the military is? And, more importantly, how many
actual boots on the ground can it deploy? Let’s put it in terms of brigade
combat teams, which total about 4,500 troops each. There are about 60 brigades in
the Army, active and reserve, here and abroad, and let’s give the
Marines another 10 brigades, for about 70 brigades. Sounds impressive. But
that’s deceptive.
Let’s put aside a big consideration – the existence of red
states that would provide for an insurgent government structure and possibly
attract the loyalty of some National Guard and even federal brigades. For
example, if President Hillary Clinton put down her chardonnay long enough to
sign a ban on privately owned guns, it’s not unreasonable to expect the
governor of Texas to reject federal authority – after all, California just
taught us that this is totally cool. But in this case, look for several
brigades located there to hoist the Lone Star flag.
So, now the blue states are facing unconventional and conventional
forces.
Let’s ignore that problem and focus on a different challenge.
Even a normal unit has about 10% non-deployable members. Now, if these troops
were assigned to combat operations against other Americans, you would have
significant additional losses through desertion. Many of the senior leaders
would participate – the Obama generation – and there is a certain type of
junior officer only too happy to curry favor by sucking up in defiance of their
oath (which is to the Constitution, not to some leftist president). You can
identify them because they usually have “strategist” in their Twitter bios. But
a lot of key, capable officer and NCO leaders, and enlisted troops, would
vanish. That is proper. It is a violation of their oath to unconstitutionally
oppress fellow Americans; their duty would be to refuse such unlawful orders.
So, you have significantly understrength units going in. Now,
how many of the troops in a brigade are actually even front line combat troops?
About a third – the rest are support. So a brigade is really about 1500
riflemen tops before you count losses. Cut those in half for sleep, training,
and refitting at any one time (which is very generous) and your brigade is
really 750 troops on your best day with everyone showing up. Realistically,
it’s 300.
That holds one mid-sized town. And there are hundreds of
mid-sized towns. Plus there are millions of Normal Americans who would fight
back. Nothing would move without their permission – a few guys shooting up big
rigs along the interstate would shut down the entire trucking industry. Bottom
line: there simply are not enough military forces to clear and hold red
America.
What about drones and bombers? Both are useful. But the minute a
bombing strike kills some red civilians the families of counter-insurgent drone
operators and pilots will be knocking at the base gates to be let inside. Now
you’ll need many of those brigades to protect the civilians you now need to
protect from retribution.
Civil wars are harsh. That’s why you avoid them.
How about the blue insurgency scenario? That goes even worse for
the Democrats. You have the federal government apparatus in the hands of red
America, and the insurgents are the opposite of decentralized and armed. They
are conveniently centered in gun-unfriendly blue cities. In other words, the
blue civilian population is much less of a threat.
A red counter-insurgency avoids the problem of a decentralized
insurgency and insecure logistical lines. In the case of California, whose
secessionist antics are approaching the point where President
Trump could legitimately employ his power to crush insurrections, the tactical
problem is relatively simple. For example, San Francisco is a hotbed of
treason, but the populace is largely unarmed and is trapped in a confined area.
You put a brigade on securing the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges, then put a
brigade on the San Francisco Peninsula to cut off the I-280 and US-101
corridors. Next you go to the Crystal Springs Dam and
cut off the water. Then you watch and wait as the tech hipsters run out of
artisanal sushi rice and kombucha.
After about a week, they surrender. After all, you can’t eat and
drink smugness. LA is just bigger in scope – more corridors to cut off, but in
the end the population concentrations in large liberal urban areas that are
their strength also make them extremely vulnerable to logistical pressure.
Then there’s another factor, an intangible but a crucial one.
It’s commitment. The Democrat threat to peace is based on its policies designed
to deprive Normal Americans of their right to speak freely, to worship freely,
and to defend themselves and their rights with firearms. Make no mistake –
millions of Normal Americans are willing to risk death to defend those rights.
In fact, many swore to do so when they entered our military and law
enforcement. But who is the leftist big talker willing to die to impose the
fascist dream of censorship, religious oppression, and disarmament on Normal
American citizens? Is the screeching SJW at Yale going to suit up in Kevlar? Is
the Vox columnist
going to grab a M4? Is the Hollywood poser going to switch her gyno-beanie for
a helmet?
No. Hell, we just heard our liberal opponents explaining why a
cop shouldn’t be expected to go fight a scumbag murdering kids because it’s
scary. America might split apart,
but it’s highly unlikely Team Kale n’ Vinyl would
fight should their big talk finally push Normal
America too far.
PRINCETON REPORT
American middle-class is addicted, poor, jobless and suicidal….
Thank the corrupt government for surrendering our borders to 40 million looting Mexicans and then handing the bills to middle America?
Unsurprisingly, Trump’s recent comments
calling for the death of drug peddlers who
“kill 5,000 people with drugs ... [and] are
making a lot of money” were not a reference
to the big-shot criminals, the CEOs and
major stockholders of the pharmaceutical
manufacturers and distribution companies,
but rather to the street-level drug sellers
who are the retail minions of the corporate
bosses.
calling for the death of drug peddlers who
“kill 5,000 people with drugs ... [and] are
making a lot of money” were not a reference
to the big-shot criminals, the CEOs and
major stockholders of the pharmaceutical
manufacturers and distribution companies,
but rather to the street-level drug sellers
who are the retail minions of the corporate
bosses.
Trump calls for execution of drug dealers at Pennsylvania rally
By Nick Barrickman
12 March 2018
In a Saturday campaign rally in the suburbs of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Republican president Donald Trump called for the execution of convicted drug dealers. This call came at a rally for a Republican congressional candidate in a district heavily affected by the closure of steel mills and the ravages of a drug epidemic that has claimed the lives of thousands in working-class communities.
“Do you think the drug dealers who kill thousands of people during their lifetime, do you think they care who’s on a blue-ribbon committee?” the president rhetorically asked his audience. He continued, “The only way to solve the drug problem is through toughness… I don’t think we should play games.”
Trump compared the supposedly lenient drug laws in the United States to the “zero tolerance” laws existing in countries such as Singapore and China, saying “I think it’s a discussion we have to start thinking about. I don't know if we’re ready—I don't know if this country’s ready for it.”
Trump made similar comments at a White House summit late last month, presenting the execution of drug traffickers as a means of stemming the opioid epidemic. The Washington Post reported Friday that the White House was considering a new policy to allow prosecutors the right to pursue the death penalty against convicted drug dealers.
Trump’s statements come amid a rapidly
expanding social crisis, in which over 64,000
Americans lost their lives to a drug overdose
in 2016, the last year for which statistics are
available. Despite the recommendations of a
six-member, bipartisan commission
established last March, the Trump
administration has produced nothing to
address the social devastation which is
responsible for the crisis. Instead, the
president has relied increasingly on
authoritarian and police-state measures.
expanding social crisis, in which over 64,000
Americans lost their lives to a drug overdose
in 2016, the last year for which statistics are
available. Despite the recommendations of a
six-member, bipartisan commission
established last March, the Trump
administration has produced nothing to
address the social devastation which is
responsible for the crisis. Instead, the
president has relied increasingly on
authoritarian and police-state measures.
In January, Democratic Representative Patrick Kennedy, a member of Trump’s commission, stated the president’s work on the drug crisis has been a “charade.” But the Democrats have generally gone along with the pretense of action, praising Trump’s declaration of a 90-day “national emergency” even though it was backed by little new funding. The Trump administration’s proposed budget slashes funding for mental health and drug treatment.
Rather than supplying funds for drug treatment, counseling and other life-saving measures, the Trump administration has sought to curtail access. In January, Seema Verma, Trump’s administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMMS) unveiled plans to introduce work requirements for low income recipients of Medicaid, which would cut drug treatments for the poor and unemployed.
The viciousness of the Trump administration’s pursuit of low-level drug offenders is matched perhaps only by its hypocrisy. In October, Trump was forced to withdraw his nomination of Pennsylvania Republican Representative Tom Marino to head the federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) after it was revealed that the congressman had spearheaded efforts to cripple the agency’s ability to regulate the pharmaceutical industry’s dispersal of cheap prescription painkillers.
Unsurprisingly, Trump’s recent
comments calling for the death of drug
peddlers who “kill 5,000 people with
drugs ... [and] are making a lot of
money” were not a reference to the big-
shot criminals, the CEOs and major
stockholders of the pharmaceutical
manufacturers and distribution
companies, but rather to the street-
level drug sellers who are the retail
minions of the corporate bosses.
comments calling for the death of drug
peddlers who “kill 5,000 people with
drugs ... [and] are making a lot of
money” were not a reference to the big-
shot criminals, the CEOs and major
stockholders of the pharmaceutical
manufacturers and distribution
companies, but rather to the street-
level drug sellers who are the retail
minions of the corporate bosses.
THE ENDLESSLY HISPANDERING DEMOCRAT PARTY funded by Wall Street’s biggest criminals says it is “ALL NEW”…. Meaning open borders to keep wages depressed and no regulation of plundering banks!
It’s Obama’s wet dream!
OPIOID ADDICTION IN AMERICA:
OBAMA AND HIS CRONIES IN BIG PHARMA AT WORK!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/10/addicted-america-in-meltdown-obama-and.html
OPEN BORDERS:
IT'S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES
DEPRESSED AND PASSING ALONG
THE ILLEGALS' WELFARE AND CRIME
COSTS TO THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE CLASS!
“That Washington-imposed policy of mass-immigration floods the market with foreign labor, spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate prices, widens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.” ---- NEIL MUNRO
TRULY, DO YOU THINK WE
HAVE A DEMOCRACY, OR IS THIS COUNTRY REALLY RULED BY CRIMINAL, PLUNDERING CRONY
BANKSTERS?
Nearly 40% Of
Americans Say They’ve Lost Faith In American Democracy
“People’s expressed faith in democracy is
tightly coupled with their partisanship in ways that threaten the system
itself.”
“Concern
about voter fraud peaks among Rs, while worry about hacking by foreigners is
significantly higher among Ds.”
AXIOS Posted
at 4:45 pm on March 11, 2018
axios.com/americans-lose-faith-democracy-754a034d-2a8a-4b20-b1d4-fbd4127385a5.htm
The thuggishness of
Barack was clear early on. There was his land deal, wherein he enriched
himself with Tony Rezko in Chicago. All his political wins came by
nefariously taking out his political opponents rather than beating them fairly
in the arena of ideas. Everyone should have known.
BARACK OBAMA and
ERICK HOLDER: BUILDING OBAMA’S MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP requires destroying
white middle class first. BLACKS HAVE ALREADY SELF-DESTRUCTED!
No comments:
Post a Comment