|
|
IMMIGRATION ANARCHISTS' LIES DEBUNKED
It's as easy as child's play.
So much of what has come to pass for “common
knowledge” is actually an example of how the principle of “The Big Lie”
can alter the public’s understanding of critical issues. Immigration has
proven to be particularly vulnerable to this tactic.
BLOG: THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY, NOW CALLING
ITSELF UNIDOus, HAS LONG OPERATED ON THE SAME PRINICIPLES AS THE THIRD REICH.
UNFORTUNATELY THEY ALSO OPERATE ON U.S. TAX DOLLAR SUBSIDIES AND GENEROUS
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500.
Under that principle, officials intentionally
concoct falsehoods and repeat them at every possible opportunity to convince
the masses that the lies are the truth. This principle was adopted
by Nazi Germany in order to con the German populace into accepting the
unfathomable depravity of the Third Reich.
Because humans think with words, control of
language ultimately results in control of thought. This was the
underlying principle of my recent article, Language Wars, The Road to Tyranny is Paved
With Language Censorship.
Today the attention span of most Americans can be
measured in minutes, if not seconds, further exacerbating the susceptibility of
folks to fall victim to language manipulation tactics. The tactics employed
by the open-borders/immigration anarchists to further
their cause are so easy to disprove that even a child could see
through their warped logic.
First off, consider the game of “Musical Chairs,”
which most children are familiar with. In this game, as music
plays,' kids circle a line of chairs that alternate in the way that the
chairs are facing. When the music stops each child scrambles to sit in
one of the chairs. What makes the game challenging is that there is one
fewer chair than the number of kids playing. Consequently, one child is
unable to find a chair and is removed from the game along with one chair.
Once again there is one chair fewer than the number of participating
children. The music starts again and the kids circle the remaining chairs
until the music stops. Each time one chair and one child are removed
until the contest comes down to two kids and one chair. Whichever kid
manages to sit is declared the winner of the game.
If you wonder what this has to do with
immigration, imagine that during the game one of the adults supervising the
game opens a door and allows many more children to flood into the room,
however, the number of chairs is not increased. This way the odds of the
children already playing the game will succeed in grabbing a seat has just been
decreased due to the number of new players introduced into the game.
It should be expected that the children will
scream that what has just happened is unfair and of course they would be
right.
Now let’s imagine that we are not talking about a
childhood game and that the chairs are available jobs and the children are
adult workers who are desperate to find a job. The “doors” that have been flung open are America’s borders
and those entering the room (labor pool) are many foreign workers,
deleteriously impacting jobs and wages across a wide spectrum of industries and
skill levels.
Incredibly, many Americans cannot figure out the
parallel between these two situations. The Democrats who refused to stand
for the State of the Union Address when President Trump noted how unemployment
levels for American blacks and Latinos were at the lowest point in years were
clearly unhappy. Could it be that they have been depending on making Americans
more dependent on the “crumbs" that they offer? I use the term
“crumbs” because this was the very word used by Nancy Pelosi to describe the
thousand-dollar bonuses a number of companies provided to their employees
because of the Trump tax cuts.
Next let’s think back to the days of “Hide and
Seek” where one child covers his/her eyes and counts to ten and then attempts
to find another child who went hiding when the first child closed his eyes.
Today that game is being played by illegal aliens
with great success because the number of ICE agents, and the number of INS
agents that preceded the creation of ICE, has always been insignificant
when compared with the huge number of illegal aliens who have entered the
United States without inspection or violating the terms of their lawful admissions.
Sanctuary city policies
make it ever more difficult for the overwhelmed ICE agents to track down and
apprehend illegal aliens, even when those aliens are engaged in criminal or
terror-related activities.
Of course, the mayors of sanctuary cities and
governors of sanctuary states hypocritically draw parallels between their
actions and the actions of leaders of the Civil Rights movement who put their
lives on the line to right the wrongs of slavery, racism, segregation and
discrimination.
Although this parallel is an enormous
falsehood, it has been repeated in the news media and by a long list of
immigration anarchists and consequently many have fallen for this outrageous
analogy. Illegal aliens are certainly protected by due process when they
are charged with a crime. But due process is not the same as Civil
Rights. The entire point to Civil Rights laws is to guarantee all Americans,
particularly American blacks, equal opportunities to be successful in
America and be full participants in American society. Elements of
this include access to quality in education, job opportunities and housing.
Illegal
aliens are not supposed to work, and knowingly providing shelter for illegal
aliens can be construed as harboring and shielding, elements of a felony under
federal law, Title 8 U.S. Code §
1324.
Where
aliens and jobs are concerned, even many categories of nonimmigrant aliens
(temporary visitors) including aliens who lawfully enter under the Visa Waiver
Program or with tourist visas may not work in the United States and immediately
become subject to removal (deportation) if they seek gainful employment.
Prior to WWII the Labor Department was
in charge of immigration. The greatest concern, back then, was to
shield American workers from foreign competition. This is how the middle
class was nurtured and grew to become the envy of the world and came to be
known as the “American Dream.”
Incredibly when President Trump, in his State of
the Union Address proclaimed, “American are dreamers too” the members of the
Democratic Party reacted with sheer hostility, not only towards the President,
but hostility and contempt for Americans.
Awhile back
I wrote an article about the veiled
attack on the middle class. In that article I reported on how on April
30, 2009, Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank,
testified at a hearing advocating the
passage of Comprehensive Immigration Reform legislation, conducted by Chuck
Schumer, then Chairman of the Senate Immigration Subcommittee.
Greenspan
was “all in” on legalizing illegal aliens, creating a guest worker program for
aliens and for hugely increasing the number of H-1B visas as Bill Gates, whom
he quoted, recommended.
As for the impact on American workers and
American cities where illegal alien workers were concerned, Greenspan said:
Some evidence suggests that unskilled illegal
immigrants (almost all from Latin America) marginally suppress wage levels of
native-born Americans without a high school diploma, and impose significant
costs on some state and local governments.
That “marginal suppression of wages” for
America’s working poor is likely a significant cause of unemployment of
Americans and a record levels of homelessness of Americans.
Greenspan’s advocacy for greatly increasing the
number of H-1B foreign worker included this justification:
The second bonus would address the increasing
concentration of income in this country. Greatly expanding our quotas for the
highly skilled would lower wage premiums of skilled over lesser skilled. Skill
shortages in America exist because we are shielding our skilled labor force
from world competition. Quotas have been substituted for the wage pricing
mechanism. In the process, we have created a privileged elite whose incomes are
being supported at noncompetitively high levels by immigration quotas on skilled
professionals. Eliminating such restrictions would reduce at least some of our
income inequality.
Greenspan actually had the unmitigated chutzpah
to refer to high-tech American workers as the “privileged elite” who are being
shielded from foreign competition. As an economist Greenspan understand
“supply and demand” and seeks to greatly increase the supply of compliant and
exploitable foreign workers in the labor pool to drive down everyone’s wages.
The Democrats frequently equate providing a minimum
wage of $10.10 per hour or $15.00 per hour with “wage equality.” This is
clearly not about wage equality but about establishing a “standard wage” which
would eradicate the middle class.
The "reforming" of our immigration laws
for Greenspan and his globalist cohorts is an effort to actually re-form our
immigration system to speed the destruction of the middle class.
Since that hearing Greenspan has persisted in his
calls for re-forming the immigration system.
Hypocrisy is usually a clear indicator of a con
job. Schumer has called for creating a federal law with
a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison for those who trespass on critical
infrastructure or national landmarks. Yet Schumer demands that aliens who trespass on America be granted
United States citizenship.
A child could see through their lies.
Publication 1. Denaturalization and Gang Membership: A brief examination of relevant statutes and due process protections both pre- and post-H.R. 4996 Blog Posts 2. How Some Chinese Students with Little English Get Admitted to U.S. Colleges 3. 'Do As I Say, Not As I Do' Hypocrisy from the UN Commissioner for Human Rights 4. Evil Deeds Flow Both Ways with the K-1 (FiancĂ©) Visa 5. Another Sanctuary Mayor Willing to Go to Jail over Immigration Law 6. Welcoming New Americans 7. Hypocrisy Thrives in Darkness 8. Double-Dealing EB-5 Lawyer Sued by SEC 9. The Most Recent Senate Efforts at Amnesty Legislation: Too Little, Too Late 10. Department of Justice Strikes Back at California's Sanctuary Laws 11. Harboring and Shielding Aliens and Other Federal Felony Offenses: A Thought Experiment 12. Attorney General Moves to Streamline Immigration Adjudications 13. An Unusual Amicus Argument 14. Mexican Presidential Candidate Visits Los Angeles 15. No-Go Zones and Assimilation 16. What to Do About California’s Sanctuary Cities 17. Chicago Dilutes Right to Vote by Designating Illegal Alien ID Card as a Registration Document 18. DOJ to Expand the Board of Immigration Appeals 19. Oakland Mayor Once Again Flirts with Federal Felony Charges for Obstructing Immigration Enforcement Efforts 20. Northern California ICE Operation Nets 150 Aliens in Three Days 21. SCOTUS Returns Order to Bond Determinations for Aliens 22.Oakland Mayor Invites Panic in Immigrant Communities 23. Can Amnestied Aliens Who Naturalize Be Denied the Right to Petition for Their Parents? 24. DHS Nibbles at H-1B Program, Delays Action on H-4s (Working Spouses) 25. SCOTUS Denies Review in DACA Lawsuit 26. Feds Provide Almost $2 Billion in Subsidies to Hire Alien Grads Rather than U.S. Grads 27. Failure to Include a Remittance Surcharge in the Tax Bill Was a Lost Opportunity 28. New Leader for USCIS Appeals Office Could Mean More Transparency 29. USCIS Changes Its Mission Statement 30. Latest Development in Decade-Long OPT Litigation 31. ICE Arrests 357 in Sanctuary Operations |
No comments:
Post a Comment