THE GREATEST THREAT AMERICA HAS EVER FACED IS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY! I can no longer remain in today’s Dem Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue and stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, are hostile to people of faith, demonize the police, and protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders. TULSI GABBARD
Friday, June 29, 2018
NANCY PELOSI'S PARTNERSHIP WITH THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT EXPOSED
“Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is
calculated to enhance her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how
porous borders will affect the security of everyday American citizens?”
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for the AMERICAN THINKER.COM
Pelosi's Stake in Illegal
Immigration FRONTPAGEmag
The Minuteman
Project, founded by Jim Gilchrist (who is also the co-author of the book
Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America’s Borders), is made up of citizen
volunteers who watch our border with Mexico and report illegal entry to the
border patrol. For performing that thankless task in full compliance with the
law, Gilchrist and his colleagues have been falsely maligned as fascists,
racists, and even murderers. They have been driven off the speaker’s platform
at Columbia University and vilified by Leftist politicians and their
handmaidens in the liberal press.
So it was no
surprise that the mainstream media chose to ignore a recent press release,
issued by his publisher, in which Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy
Pelosi’s ethics that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American –
including those immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here
the proper way: “Do we really need a
House Speaker whose every action is calculated to enhance her own financial
interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders will affect the security
of everyday American citizens?”
Gilchrist did
not stop there. He demanded an investigation into Pelosi’s “economic stake in
just the kind of illegal alien exploitation that we deplore in Minutemen.” But
you would never know it from the liberal media, who - while ignoring this
demand - have had no compunctions in calling for Speaker Hastert’s head in the
wake of the Foley page controversy.
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks
ago in FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa
Valley where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign
labor – is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal
immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even more proof of this than I
previously reported, Pelosi does not want employers like her to be required to
pay the cost of illegal aliens’ hospital care. She voted against a bill that
would make employers liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee
seeks medical attention. And she voted in favor of rewarding illegal aliens
from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
At the same
time, Pelosi has led the Democratic opposition to any effective border controls
or documentation requirements. She opposed the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed
into law by President Bush, and voted against final passage of a border
security and enforcement bill in 2005 which required that all businesses must
use an electronic system to check if all new hires have the legal right to work
in this country. She voted against a bill to bar drivers' licenses for illegal
aliens in 2005. This year she opposed
legislation requiring presentation of a legitimate government-issued photo ID
to prove eligibility to vote, claiming that “there is little evidence anywhere
in the country of a significant problem with non-citizen voters.” She is
dead wrong. For example, an accused terrorist by the name of Nuradin Abdi was
just recently reported to have illegally registered to vote at the Ohio Bureau
of Motor Vehicles. Nuradin Abdi was indicted earlier this year as part of a
conspiracy to blow up the Columbus Mall.
How many other
terrorist suspects may have slipped through the system because Leftists like
Pelosi oppose any meaningful screens? Instead she continues to advocate our
recognition of the flimsy, non-validated ID card that the Mexican consulates
provide to illegal aliens before they cross over our border, called the
“matricula consular”, which gives them phony documentation to set up bank
accounts, apply for jobs, obtain social benefits, board airplanes, identify
themselves to police, enter buildings that require IDs, obtain drivers’
licenses and then perhaps use those drivers’ licenses to try to illegally
register to vote in our elections.
Pelosi also
believes in giving sanctuary to illegal aliens. She opposed legislation to deny
federal homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to
share information they learn about an individual's immigration status with
Federal immigration authorities. Pelosi’s
hometown of San Francisco is one of the sanctuary cities she voted to protect
for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi even voted against strengthening our
immigration law with regard to the deportability of alien terrorists.
Jim Gilchrist
cut to the chase with this devastating observation that the mainstream media
does not want you to read:
"As we’ve
shown again and again in ‘Minutemen,’ the Democrats aren’t just hypocrites, but
are working actively to subvert our legislative system to their own ends. Their
only goal is votes, votes and more votes, no matter where they come from, no
matter if they’re cast legally, no matter whether the person casting them is
dead, alive, a citizen or an illegal alien."
Pelosi sees
Jim Gilchrist’s Minutemen Project as a threat to her pro-illegal alien agenda. More illegal aliens mean more votes for the
Democrats and more grape-pickers for Napa Valley vineyards like hers. So
she even voted against a measure that would have cut off the use of U.S.
taxpayers’ funds to tip off illegal aliens as to where the Minutemen citizen
patrols may be located! She obviously wants to see the Minutemen put out of
business – permanently. She can count on the liberal press to distort the work
of the Minutemen and to keep out of the public eye Gilchrist’s pointed
questions about her motivations for helping illegal aliens during the run-up to
the mid-term elections that may make her the next Speaker of the House.
Gilchrist, of
course, is accustomed to being vilified and prevented by the Left from getting
his message out. In early October, he was prevented from finishing his speech
at the "Minutemen Forum" sponsored by the Columbia College
Republicans. Gilchrist had spoken for just a few minutes and managed to utter
the words “I love the First Amendment” when a group of radical protestors took
the stage and interrupted him, displaying a big banner saying "There are
no illegals." More protestors then stormed the stage. Chaos erupted and
the audience members who had come to hear Gilchrist speak never got the chance,
which was precisely the protestors’ objective. As reported online by the staff
of Columbia’s undergraduate newspaper, “a mosh pit of triumphal students and
community members danced and chanted outside, "Asian, Black, Brown and
White, we smashed the Minutemen tonight!" They also put out a statement
declaring:
“The Minutemen
are not a legitimate voice in the debate on immigration. They are a racist,
armed militia who have declared open hunting season on immigrants, causing
countless hate crimes and over 3000 deaths on the border. Why should
exploitative corporations have free passes between nations, but individual
people not? No human being is illegal.” (Emphasis added)
We have come
to the point in this country where a bunch of radical protestors get to decide
who is and who is not a legitimate voice in the debate on as critical a public
policy issue as immigration. Such Leftists think that migration in a borderless
world is a basic human right. They want no barriers, no guards, and no proof of
lawful residency. They certainly do not want the Minutemen watching the border
and reporting illegal entry to the authorities.
Leftist
slogans like “no human being is illegal” are red herrings. It is not the human
being who is illegal; it is what the human being does that may be illegal.
One’s conduct is the test, not simply who one is. Immigrants who follow our
rules are welcome here. Those who do not abide by our laws have no right to be
here. A person who breaks into your house without your permission does not
deserve room, board and a job as a reward, even if the intruder may be much
poorer than you. He has broken the law and deserves to be punished for what he
has done. Our country’s boundaries and rules for entry and residency similarly
define who is permitted to be here and how we choose to protect ourselves. We
are a land of immigrants, but we are also a land of laws with certain core
values. Those seeking to enter our country and remain here must learn to
accommodate to our laws and values, not the other way around. That is the way
prior generations of immigrants did it, including those who passed through
Ellis Island. Why should the law be thrown aside now?
What we are
witnessing is a frontal challenge to our nation’s sovereignty. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary wants to drag us
before the United Nations for intending to build a fence on our side of the
border with our money to keep out aliens who seek to enter our country
illegally. They will probably get a sympathetic ear as some UN bureaucrats
believe there should be no such thing as “illegal” immigrants in the first
place. For the first time in our history, Americans are being asked to cede the
right to decide how we define ourselves as a nation and protect our own borders
to a globalist governance body. Will Pelosi lead her liberal loyalists as House
Speaker to support the UN against America’s right to control its own borders?
Do we really want to risk finding out?
It is high
time, as Jim Gilchrist demanded in the press release ignored by the mainstream
media, that Pelosi come clean under oath as to her personal stake in the
illegal immigration issue before she can do even more damage as House Speaker.
CALL NANCY PELOSI...ask her how many illegals she hires and how many voted for her!
Washington , DC - (202) 225-4965 San Francisco , CA - (415)
556-4862
USE THE EMAIL AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS POSTING AND SEND A COPY TO LA
RAZA PELOSI
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
THE PLUNDERING BARONESS PELOSI:
Nancy Pelosi triples her loot since the banksters
nearly destroyed America’s economy and demands endless hordes of illegals to
keep wages depressed!
MAKES YOU WONDER HOW MANY ILLEGALS SHE EMPLOYS AT HER
ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY …. The same county where an ILLEGAL started a fire that
killed dozens and did millions of dollars in property damage!
WAR ON THE AMERICA
WORKER: FEINSTEIN, PELOSI, OBAMA, and the CLINTON CRIME DUAL
“Senator
Dianne Feinstein warned, at the time, they had to solve this crisis now—of
immigrants coming in illegally and getting these jobs.”
THE COST OF THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY’S OPEN BORDERS AND MORE WELFARE FOR INVADING MEXICANS HAS BEEN
STAGGERING!
“Liberal governing has
transformed beautiful California into the poverty
capital of America with the worst quality of life. Crazy taxes, crazy high cost of living, and crazy overreaching regulations have crushed the
middle class, forcing the middle class to exit the Sunshine
State. All that is left in California are illegals feeding at the
breast of the state, rapidly growing massive
homeless tent cities, and the mega-rich.” LLOYD MARCUS
ANYONE KNOW IF THE OL’ BARONESS AND CLOSET REPUBLICAN USES
ILLEGALS AT THER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY? SHE’S LOTHE TO PAY LEGALS A LIVING
WAGES. BUT THEN THE CATASTROPHIC NAPA FIRE WAS CAUSED BY ONE OF HER ILLEGALS,
SO PERHAPS HER PLACE BURNED DOWN!
Pelosi's corrupt insider passing of bills that make her rich.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home House District includes
San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home
district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor
to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of
the Samoan workforce.
Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of
Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to
$7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would
not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less
expensive than their competition's.
Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an
earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an "economic
development credit in American Samoa".
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "corrupt".
Critical to the contentious and ongoing immigration debate is the undeniable fact that low-skilled jobs, requiring little to no formal education, are disappearing or being phased out of almost every industry in America. In the age of a rapidly changing work force, the Democrat initiative to flood the country with people who can't compete in today's job market is myopic, not to mention fiscally irresponsible.
Unlike in the United States, the process of legal immigration in Australia is strict. It's highly regulated and involves a lengthy process for anyone wishing to relocate permanently to the land down under. In fact, part of the Australian immigration application process is proof of employment – prior to arriving – in addition to a proven ability of every applicant to financially support himself. Preference is given to potential new citizens who have a college degree or skill set in engineering, medicine, and technology. Work visas are granted, but the number is abysmally small compared to the number the government receives each year. Furthermore, the official language of Australia is English. In order to be employed in almost every sector of industry, applicants must speak, read, and write English fluently.
Australia is just one example of a handful of countries that require immigrants to bring something to the table. In other words, the immigrant must first prove that he will not be a financial drain on society and will contribute positively to the community.
First and foremost, people crossing the U.S. southern border are uneducated, illiterate, and lacking any real-world skill set. Strike one: They are, for the most part, shut out of the highly competitive, educated American work force, consigned to manual labor in the service, restaurant, agriculture, or hospitality industry. With that in mind, there is a finite number of low-skilled labor jobs available – there are only so many lawns to mow, toilets to clean, restaurant dishes to wash, and hotel rooms to be vacuumed.
Despite the Democrat canard about immigrants doing the jobs that Americans refuse to do, even some of those jobs are disappearing – for example, taking fast food orders at the counter. The CEO of McDonald's recently announced that all McDonald's restaurants in the U.S. will be outfitted with computer order kiosks over the next few years. No doubt, other fast food restaurants will follow the lead of McDonald's. That alone equates to a sharp reduction in employees, many of whom are low-skilled, barely educated immigrants, young and middle-aged.
The same kind of technology innovations are also occurring in the agriculture industry; automated harvesting machines are replacing human hands. Ever see a machine shake a pecan tree and catch falling pecans in a steel hopper? I have.
Strike two: The vast majority of new arrivals, whether they be illegal aliens or refugees, don't speak English. A first-generation immigrant will never bother learning to read or write English, either. They don't have to. If allowed to stay in the U.S., they gravitate toward predominantly minority neighborhoods, where everyone speaks some form of their native tongue. Firsters may acquire enough English to get by, but for the most part, they will continue to speak their native languages at home, in their communities, and within their family circles, which severely limits their employment opportunities. If they do seek work outside the home, they will be in the company of people much like themselves: uneducated, low-skilled manual laborers.
Unfortunately, this segment of American society has one of three paths of livelihood in the U.S.: destined to stagnate in a service industry job with little upward job mobility, government dependence, or a life of crime.
The correlation between chronically unemployed foreign entrants to the U.S. and every category of violent crime in the United States is no coincidence. There's a good reason why President Trump, with the help of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is chasing down, rounding up, arresting, and deporting MS-13 gang members. The majority of foreign-born MS-13 gang members have taken advantage of the easily accessible southern border for the sole purpose of expanding the drug trade in the United States. Strike three for America.
Until stricter, highly regulated, and closely monitored border access is achieved, hordes of people who bring nothing to the table will continue to plague America
Nancy Pelosi Demands Zero Border Enforcement: Detention of Illegal Aliens Is ‘Form of Child Abuse’
President Donald Trump’s executive order which modifies his “zero tolerance” policy at the United States-Mexico border has leftDemocrats and the open borders lobby fighting for an end to all border enforcement, inviting floods of illegal immigration and cheap foreign labor into the country.
The zero-tolerance policy mandates that all illegal border crossers — including illegal alien adults who cross the border with children — be prosecuted and eventually deported from the U.S. This policy results in border-crossing parents having their children taken into federal custody. This is a loophole known as the Flores SettlementAgreement.
In an effort to modify and strengthen his zero-tolerance policy, Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that keeps border crossing family units in detention together while they are prosecuted. These border crossing families will be held in facilities run by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) rather than being released into the interior of the U.S. through the “Catch and Release” program.
No comments:
Post a Comment