http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/la-raza-hillary-clinton-backs-mexican.html
VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
(DO A SEARCH FOR THE CLINTON’S LONG HISTORY WITH THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” NOW CALLING ITSELF UNIDOSus.)
July 23, 2018
Losing America
By John Scotto
Not too long ago we as a
people could generally agree upon a certain set of core values. Today a smaller
majority of the American people still believe in the US Constitution and many
people are starting to lose focus on the things that really matter the most.
When did certain members
of our society all of sudden become selective regarding the laws they wished to
be enforced ?
When exactly did some US
citizens lose their basic instinct for survival ?
The Democratic Party's
leadership not too long ago believed illegal immigration was wrong (video).
Why have their minds now suddenly shifted ? Has importing a new
Democrat voter base into this nation become just too appealing an idea for them
not to take advantage of? A voter base which would be
beholden to big government from cradle to grave. A voting bloc of people that
would cast their votes depending upon what government could provide them.
Most rational citizens
understand that unfettered and unchecked illegal immigration is a recipe for
disaster. Yet huge factions of the new radical leftist Democrats currently
believe illegal immigration is some kind of noble cause involving social
justice. Many within the current party leadership have become all too willing
to completely toss away the former US immigration melting pot model and happily
replace it with a new "salad bowl" model.
Reality and history have
proven to all of us that a nation simply we cannot safely absorb relentless
waves of unassimilated immigration and expect to survive. Illegal
immigrants bring with them so many different languages and cultures, and many
of them have no desire to assimilate or learn the English language. Diversity
is not always necessarily a strength. Change is not always a positive thing.
Illegal immigrants who refuse to assimilate and learn our language are placing
a heavy burden upon us.
Illegal aliens who are
willing to work for extremely low wages are helping to eliminate the US blue
collar middle class. These illegal aliens currently flooding
the US labor force are driving down the wages of American workers. I am sick of
hearing the line, "Americans are not willing to do those jobs." In
reality Americans would be willing to do those jobs, but obviously not for
slave wages.
Illegal immigration is
placing an enormous financial burden upon our health care system. It has become
common place for illegal aliens to use the emergency rooms of US hospitals as
their personal doctors. This inevitably drives up the cost of healthcare for
all of us.
A decade-and-a-half ago, a
former liberal Democrat named Dick Lamm gave a prophetic five minute speech on
how a nation like America could easily self-destruct. The former governor of
Colorado was issuing a warning to all of us in the United States who were
willing to listen. Lamm unveiled a chilling point by point hypothetical
plan on how to destroy America through the immigration process. Every
citizen within this country should consider listening to this five
minute audio clip and hear the chilling prophetic words of Lamm
ring out so loud and true today.
A nation that makes
allowances for illegal immigration, especially without any significant time for
assimilation, eventually becomes a nation under invasion,
something which then eventually results in colonization.
The rule of law becomes a
moot point when corrupt agenda-driven politicians within the government get to
pick and choose the laws they wish to be enforced. When this type of selective
law enforcement is facilitated, our country becomes nothing more than a banana
republic.
The many remaining
law-abiding citizens, along with Republican politicians, need to start
adamantly calling out the Democrats for their irrational supportive stance
regarding illegal immigration. We all need to confront the radical Democrats
head on. They are the party whose senior members have the audacity to lecture
and virtue signal conservatives on how evil and uncaring we have all become.
Constantly painting those of us on the right as the bad guys. Simply because we
conservatives dare to hold our American sovereignty sacred and know our borders
need to become more safe and secure. All the rational people within this
country are demanding the immigration process be a legal and closely monitored
one.
Immigration could be a
winning issue for Republicans in November. But they need to hammer this issue
home with courage and fortitude, not backing down for fear of being called a
racist or xenophobe. If the Republicans expect to win in November, they need to
highlight all the negatives of uninterrupted waves of illegal immigration. A
non-stop flow of illegal immigration being shoved down our throats by the
Democrats and their puppet media.
We conservatives all need to
stand as one with President Trump and affirm his policies regarding
immigration. Trump's immigration plan adheres to basic common sense. Trump is
putting individual American citizen's lives above political correctness, and
this is making us all safer.
Illegal immigration has become
the catalyst for big changes in this country. Changes within a nation which
inevitably become irreversible if we fail to act. Change for the sake of change
is a most dangerous thing.
An America that ignores the
problems that come attached to open borders and illegal immigration is doomed
for destruction. A citizenry which no longer believes in the rule of law and
which pays lip service to our US Constitution is no longer free. A people who
are no longer willing to hold their leaders accountable in regard to enforcing
the rule of law, eventually become enslaved within a tyranny.
Photo credit: Markistos via Wikimedia
Commons
OC Judge Fast-Tracks Huntington Beach Lawsuit Against ‘Sanctuary State’
An Orange County Superior Court Judge decided July 19 to fast-track the City of Huntington Beach’s lawsuit challenging one of California’s “sanctuary state” laws, and set a date for a September 27 trial.
The Huntington Beach City Council voted April 2 to be the first California city to sue the state to overturn Senate Bill 54 (SB 54), titled the “California Values Act.” Mayor Mike Posey and Councilman Erik Peterson that sponsored the closed session agenda item that passed on a 6 to 1 vote in closed session, called SB 54 “constitutional overreach.” The council directed City Attorney Michael Gates to to invite other cities and counties to join the suit, according to the local Los Alamitos Patch.
Mayor Posey issued a press release the next morning that stated that unlike other cities that had passed ordinances and resolutions protesting the SB 54, Huntington Beach had independent authority as a “charter city” to file its own lawsuit to preserve local residents’ right to protections under the California and U.S. Constitutions.
California Deputy Attorney General Jonathan Eisenberg filed an early July motion to halt Huntington Beach’s lawsuit on the grounds it would be more efficient to delay the state court action until judgement was rendered in two similar federal lawsuits filed earlier this year.
A federal judge upheld SB 54 earlier this month, along with one other “sanctuary state” law, while blocking part of AB 450, a law that penalized California businesses for voluntary cooperation with federal immigration law enforcement.
The Los Angeles Times reported that at the July 19 trial setting hearing, Judge Crandall denied the State of California’s request to delay trial, writing that the “two federal actions do not cover the same subject matter” as the Huntington Beach lawsuit.
City Attorney Gatesto said he was pleased with the ruling and believed “the court is interested in taking up the matter.” Gatesto added that SB 54 improperly forbids certain types of general fund spending on law enforcement by municipalities.
The Federation for Immigration Reform argues that SB 54 effectively makes California a “sanctuary state” by legalizing and standardizing statewide non-cooperation policies between California law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities.
CRIMINALS WIN BIG IN CALIFORNIA
SANCTUARY RULING
Bush appointee
upholds protections for false-documented illegals.
“California beats Trump in sanctuary state battle’s first
round,” read the
page-one Sacramento Bee headline last Friday. As readers
discovered, it was actually a split decision and Trump scored a big hit.
U.S. District Court Judge John Mendez, an
appointee of George W. Bush, ruled that the state could not prevent private
employers from denying federal immigration authorities from worksites. Mendez
found that AB 450 “which imposes monetary penalties on an employer solely
because that employer voluntarily consents to federal immigration enforcement’s
entry into nonpublic areas of their place of business or access to their
employment records impermissibly discriminates against those who choose to deal
with the federal government.”
On the other hand, Mendez upheld the law’s
requirement that companies inform workers within 72 hours of any federal
request to examine employment records. So in the style of Oakland mayor Libby Schaaf, employers can still provide lookout services for
false-documented illegals.
Mendez denied the federal request against
SB 54, the state’s sanctuary law. As author Kevin de Leon told reporters,
“today, a federal judge made clear what I’ve known all along, that SB 54, the
California Values Act is constitutional and does not conflict with federal law.
California is under no obligation to assist Trump tear apart families. We
cannot stop his mean-spirited immigration policies, but we don’t have to help
him, and we won’t.”
As Mendez ruled, “refusing to help is not
the same as impeding.” The federal judge also upheld AB 103, allowing the state
attorney general to inspect detention facilities. Current attorney general
Xavier Becerra, once on Hillary Clinton’s short list as a running mate
and a key player in the Democrats’ IT scandal, proclaimed, “The Constitution gives the people of California,
not the Trump Administration, the power to decide how we will provide for our
public safety and general welfare.”
Californians had a right to wonder about
the “safety” part. In this 2-1 split decision the biggest winners are criminal
illegals.
Senate Bill 54, the Bee report
noted, “has eliminated much of the discretionary power that local law
enforcement previously had to privately share information with federal
immigration agents about people who have been arrested and put in county
jails.” So despite the protestations of hereditary, recurring governor Jerry
Brown, California is protecting criminal illegals. With that in mind,
legitimate citizens might look ahead to the November election.
Brown, a three-time presidential loser,
recently signed off on a budget that spends tens of millions of dollars to help
illegals fight efforts to deport them. This includes some $45 million in legal
services steered to state colleges, and $10 million to help younger illegals,
including “undocumented migrants.” This outlandish spending is hardly the
state’s only way to privilege false-document illegals.
A 2015 law, “streamlines” the process of
voter registration and kicks in when someone gets a driver’s license at the
DMV. As of March, 2018, more than one million illegals have received licenses.
Secretary of state Alex Padilla touts “firewall” protections against ineligible
voters. This is the same official who refused to cooperate with a federal
probe of voter fraud, so legal residents and taxpayers have good reason to
wonder what he is hiding.
Senate boss Kevin de Leon, author of SB
54, is on record that half his family would be eligible for deportation under
Trump’s executive order because they used false Social Security cards and other
bogus identification. In his own case, as Christopher Cadelago of the Sacramento Bee explains, “The name on his birth certificate isn’t Kevin de León.”
On his birth certificate and voter rolls,
“the 50-year-old politician is Kevin Alexander Leon,” born on December 10, 1966
at California Hospital on South Hope Street in Los Angeles. The birth
certificate “describes his father, Andres Leon, as a 40-year-old cook whose
race was Chinese and whose birthplace was Guatemala. De León’s mother, Carmen
Osorio, was also born in Guatemala, the document states.” As a child, “de León
spent time on both sides of the border,” but he “identifies strongly with
Mexican culture.”
Around Sacramento many found the story
incredible but it now takes on new significance. Senate boss de Leon
spearheaded the smackdown of Sen. Janet Nguyen’s free-speech rights and ordered the Republican, a refugee from Communist
Vietnam, carted off the senate floor. The senate boss also appointed a false-documented Mexican national to a state
position, a violation of Proposition 209, a voter-approved law that forbids racial and ethnic preferences in state
employment, education and contracting.
The public never voted on de Leon’s
sanctuary bill, but the author is now on the November ballot contending with fellow Democrat
Dianne Feinstein for a seat in the U.S. Senate. Republicans are again shut out of the senate race because in
California primaries the top two vote-getters advance regardless of
party.
As a State Department investigation
confirms, false-documented illegals have been voting in local,
state and federal elections for decades. Legitimate citizens and legal immigrants now have a stronger
case for ID checks on voters and candidates alike. Under the Mendez ruling many
more illegals, including criminals, will be seeking protected, privileged
status in California.
June 16, 2018
Skyrocketing crime rate in
California called 'good progress' after jails emptied
Here's a thought experiment: what happens if you release
criminals, a lot of them, from jail?
If you asked a liberal in California, he would tell you these criminals
were unjustly jailed in the first place (think racism on the part of liberal
inner-city judges, juries, and prosecutors) and that these unjustly imprisoned
would return to become productive parts of society.
Imagine their surprise to learn, then, that after reducing or
eliminating sentences for certain property crimes, the rate of property
crimes has
only increased!
California voters' decision to reduce penalties for drug and
property crimes in 2014 contributed to a jump in car burglaries, shoplifting
and other theft, researchers reported.
Larcenies increased about 9% by 2016, or about 135 more thefts per
100,000 residents than if tougher penalties had remained, according to results
of a study by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California released
Tuesday.
Thefts from motor vehicles accounted for about three-quarters of
the increase. San Francisco alone recorded more than 30,000 auto burglaries
last year, which authorities largely blamed on gangs.
Proposition 47 lowered criminal sentences for drug possession,
theft, shoplifting, identity theft, receiving stolen property, writing bad
checks and check forgery from felonies that can carry prison terms to
misdemeanors that often bring minimal jail sentences.
Do you think liberals have learned anything from
this? Think again:
California still has historically low crime rates despite recent
changes in the criminal justice system aimed at reducing mass incarceration and
increasing rehabilitation and treatment programs, said Lenore Anderson, the
executive director of Californians for Safety and Justice and a leader in the
drive to pass Proposition 47.
"This report shows we are making progress," she said in
a statement calling for less spending on prisons and more on programs to help
reduce the cycle of crime.
The ballot measure led to the lowest arrest rate in state history
in 2015 as experts said police frequently ignored crimes that brought minimal
punishment.
They say a conservative is a liberal who has been
mugged. If that's true, then it must also be true in California that
a liberal is a liberal who has had his car or home broken
into. Indeed, people in San Francisco have had their cars broken
into so frequently that they think this is the "new normal," and
people talk laughingly to each other about how often their cars have been
broken into, as if it's a subject of conversation as common as the doings of
the local sports team.
Reality will never intrude on a liberal's ideology. An
illegal alien could shoot a woman dead on Fisherman's Wharf, and liberals would
still never see a problem with sanctuary cities. Homeless people can
roam the streets like swarms of giant rats, leaving fetid excrement and bloody
hypodermic needles in their wake, and people would accept it, because it is
part of their ideology.
That's how they can call this abomination "progress."
Will
Californians Prevail Against the Little Picture of Hell?
https://townhall.com/columnists/arthurschaper/2018/06/05/draft-n2487359
The state of California has descended into
a modern-day version of Dante’s Inferno, where treachery of all kinds occupies
the bottom circle. Public sector unions are running (or rather ruining) the
state into bankruptcy, betraying the public trust while charging the taxpayers
for the perverse privilege. Republicans collude with the supermajority of
Democrats to raise taxes, fees, and unrelenting regulatory burdens.
The public schools indoctrinate their
young charges to hate this country and the rule of law. Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public services
while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety for all
citizens. The federal government has filed lawsuits against Sanctuary
California, and ICE is rounding up illegals in their homes and in workplaces.
However, demonic pro-illegal forces still parade in the streets and cross our
borders, defying American sovereignty. Larger cities have more homeless than homes
for citizens.
The natural disasters are hitting crisis
level, too. The Bible depicts torturous flames with respite in hell without
respite, (Luke 16: 24). So too parched conditions have engulfed California.
Wildfires have become a year-round terror, yet the state’s leadership refuses
to prepare emergency water storage. This past week, two hundred firefighters
had to quell another massive conflagration in south Orange County, and summer
hasn’t even begun yet. To make matters legislation to make the current drastic
water rationing permanent!
Even wealthy coastal elites have found
that the cost of living in California is slowly exceeding its value. Money
can’t create water, and financial gain provided nothing for West Los Angeles
socialites when a few homeless transients set a blaze along the 405 Freeway
overpass along the Santa Monica mountains.
All of this is a testimony to the damage
wrought by progressive policies which have transformed California into a
picture of hell. That’s precisely what Evangelical preacher Franklin Graham
called California … or at least that’s what he called the sanctuary cities.
During an interview on the Todd Starnes Show, Graham
commented:
"People are leaving the state. The
tax base is eroding. They are turning their once beautiful cities into
sanctuary cities, which are just a little picture of Hell," Graham said.
"Just go to San Francisco and go to this once-beautiful city and see what
has happened to it."
But why did the son of the renowned
Reverend Billy Graham take time to comment on the harrowing horrors of
California? For his latest Gospel Crusade, he visited ten cities in the
once-Golden State. Starting on May 20 in Escondido (one of several cities to challenge
SB 54, aka the Sanctuary State law over the past three month), Graham is
bringing the message of the Good News to the dispirited wasteland along the
Left Coast.
Returning to Pastor Graham’s signature
statement from the Starnes interview, finally a pastor of stature and renown is
condemning sanctuary city policies, and a welcome response from the
all-too-quiet church leadership in California and across the country. Pastors
should be the first to denounce this misnamed, misleading agenda. The concept
of sanctuary comes from the Bible, better known as “cities of refuge” (cf.
Numbers 35:11-28), locations reserved for those who had accidentally killed
someone. To avoid retribution, they would flee to those cities.
In California, sanctuary policies bar local
and state law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials
to arrest and deport illegal aliens. These cities are not safeguarding
otherwise innocent people, but are protecting criminals who have broken into
the United States and reside illegally to this day. Pundits left and right
contend that these policies actually protect otherwise law-abiding residents to
seek help and report crimes. Nothing could be further from the truth.
However, is it fair to tie the long list
of hellish outcomes from these left-wing enclaves to their refusal to enforce
federal immigration laws?
Yes.
What has happened to sanctuary city San
Francisco, for example? The progressivism that made God nothing and man’s
“ideas” everything created the s***-hole dystopia that resides there today.
It’s an overpriced progressive utopia, to put it charitably. For the
vast-majority of residents, even for those who can afford it, a salary of
$100,000 a year barely pays the rent. Roommates doubling up is the norm,
especially among the Big Tech interns who take the bus to Silicon Valley to
work all day on the latest app for the Google, Facebook, EBay overlords.
For the price they pay to live in the
city, San Franciscans aren’t getting their money’s worth. Intravenous drug needles
litter the streets everywhere. Homelessness is more common than homeownership.
“S***hole” better describes the streets of the city, where the feces piles have
so overwhelmed the streets, that visitors receive maps on how best to navigate
away from the crap and corruption. Street fights among transients and the
mentally ill have exploded, rampant moral decline has overshadowed the once
great city. Tourists find enough to see, then flee.
Freedom of speech and freedom of religion
have lost their place, even though Graham’s latest crusades have succeeded in
otherwise unfriendly territory, like Berkeley. Last year, the Patriot Prayer
movement, headed by Joey Gibson, attempted to throw two rallies for freedom of
speech and thought. The elected officials of San Francisco (including Nancy
Pelosi) and the now-deceased mayor Ed Lee, smeared the peaceful program as a
“White supremacy rally.” Gibson is half Japanese, by the way.
Where Gibson had tried and failed,
Graham’s message of hope accomplished peaceful gatherings with a call to action
to California’s Christians. And I say it’s about time. There have been flickers
of hope in spite of the deranged left-wing agenda ravaging my home state.
Californians in general, and Christians in particular, need to step up. They
are called to be light in a dark, hellish world, but nothing good will happen
if they don’t vote for their values, then educate the public how to fight
against the devilish lawlessness foisted upon us by our political leaders and
the cultural elites running—or rather ruining—the state.
June 5, 2018
The one topic Democrats
don't dare bring up in today's SoCal primary
The airwaves in Southern
California are flooded with Democratic candidate ads, with most openly touting
extremely loony far-left positions – promises of free health care for all, free
college for all, beefed up public funding for Planned Parenthood, full gun
control, pretty much the full Bernie Sanders plate of pie-in-the-sky
goodies. Democrats, whether in the House, Senate, governor, or
assembly races, are all openly offering all the free stuff on the far left's
wish list, not holding back at all. Fiscal discipline isn't in fashion
with this bunch. If I had to speculate, I'd say it's because at the
time these platforms were formulated, Democrats were convinced that a blue wave
was upon them. In a crowded field, and at primary time, where only
the most committed voters show up, extremism seems to be the way to stand out
and get ahead of the pack.
There's one topic among
these offerings that isn't being touched – not even in one campaign ad:
Illegal immigration.
As the sign says:
"Caution."
We all know that Democrats
favor open borders, given the potential for muscling mendicant votes in the
state's poorest cities from their well oiled political machines. Democrats
favor DACA, DAPA for the parents, amnesty, state benefits for illegals – from
driver's licenses to free health care – an end to deportations, and no border
wall, let alone National Guardsmen at the borders. You can find
vague admissions of these stances on candidates' websites, buried deep.
But somehow, this topic
isn't one they want to bring up in the heat of the primaries, at least not in
ads, where they have an overcrowded slate of candidates on the June ballot, and
face the real prospect of seeing no Democrats making it to the slate in
November.
Illegal immigration seems to
be the electric third rail.
That says a lot about the
sentiment of the voters in illegal alien-filled California, which houses one
quarter of the nation's illegals. Nobody's brought up the Democratic
plan for free health care for illegals, now wending its way through the
California statehouse. Nobody's asked Gavin Newsom, the frontrunner
for the Democratic nomination for governor, what he thinks of the state's
inundation of illegals, and he's certainly said nothing to the broad public
about it in his ads. The costs of illegal
immigration are being carefully
hidden by Democrats.
Meanwhile, city after city
and county after county in Southern California has joined the lawsuit against
the state for its "sanctuary state" laws, which require them to house
and feed illegals instead of turn them over to the feds for breaking the
law. It's probably significant that increasingly blue San
Diego and Orange Counties, the two areas Democrats have placed all
their hopes and cash on for winning the House back, have joined this movement.
It all suggests that this
topic is dry tinder among voters, the internal polls look bad for Democrats on
their free everything for illegals, and the Democratic Party line is far more
unpopular than anyone on the left is willing to admit.
President Trump should have
a field day enacting his orderly immigration agenda, even in California, when
crunch time comes at the November midterms.
It Pays to be Illegal in California
It
certainly is a good time to be an illegal alien in California. Democratic State
Sen. Ricardo Lara last week pitched a bill to permit illegal immigrants to
serve on all state and local boards and commissions. This week, lawmakers
unveiled a $1 billion health care plan that would include spending
$250 million to extend health care coverage to all illegal alien adults.
“Currently,
undocumented adults are explicitly and unjustly locked out of healthcare due to
their immigration status. In a matter of weeks, California legislators will have
a decisive opportunity to reverse that cruel and counterproductive fact,”
Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula said in Monday’s Sacramento Bee.
His
legislation, Assembly Bill 2965, would give as many as 114,000
uninsured illegal aliens access to Medi-Cal programs. A companion bill has been
sponsored by State Sen. Richard Lara.
But that
could just be a drop in the bucket. The Democrats’ plan covers more than
100,000 illegal aliens with annual incomes bless than $25,000, however an
estimated 1.3 million might be eligible based on their earnings.
In
addition, it is estimated that 20 percent of those living in California
illegally are uninsured – the $250 million covers just 11 percent.
So, will
politicians soon be asking California taxpayers once again to dip into their
pockets to pay for the remaining 9 percent?
Before
they ask for more, Democrats have to win the approval of Gov. Jerry Brown, who
cautioned against spending away the state’s surplus when he introduced his $190 billion budget
proposal in January.
Given
Brown’s openness to expanding Medi-Cal expansions in recent years, not to
mention his proclivity for blindly supporting any measure benefitting
lawbreaking immigrants, the latest fiscal irresponsibility may win approval.
And if he
takes a pass, the two Democrats most likely to succeed Brown – Lt. Gov. Gavin
Newsom and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa – favor excessive social spending and are actively courting
illegal immigrant support.
THE ILLEGALS’ AND THEIR CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Heather Mac Donald
of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that
in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for
illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were
illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the
18th Street gang, were illegal aliens.
No comments:
Post a Comment