AMERICA: ONE PAYCHECK AND TWELVE
ILLEGALS AWAY FROM HOMELESSNESS!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/rick-moran-los-angeles-mexicos-second.html
A dashcam video of downtown Los Angeles on
Christmas day reveals a stunning sight: hundreds of tents and lean-tos on the
sidewalks that serve as shelter for the homeless. The scene is reminiscent of a
third-world country. RICK MORAN / AMERICANTHINKER
com
THE
BREEDERS for welfare:
WILL
MEXICO DOUBLE AMERICA’S POPULATION?
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/09/the-breeders-will-mexico-double-us.html
“Through love of having children we're going to take
over."
Augustin
Cebada, Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers
of Aztlan shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los
Angeles, 7/4/96
Anchor Baby
Population in U.S. Exceeds One Year of American Births JOHN BINDER
THE INVITED INVADING HORDES: IT’S
ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED!
"In the decade following the
financial crisis of 2007-2008, the capitalist class has delivered powerful
blows to the social position of the working class. As a result, the working
class in the US, the world’s “richest country,” faces levels of economic
hardship not seen since the 1930s."
"Inequality has reached
unprecedented levels: the wealth of America’s three richest people now
equals the net worth of the poorest half of the US population."
Shocker: Study shows the number of illegals double what was previously thought
However big you thought the problem of illegal aliens in America was, a trio of Yale researches says it's double what everyone thinks.
The three university-affiliated researchers say that the previous estimate of 11.3 million illegals is based on one study with problematic methodology. The researchers took an entirely different approach and came up with the shocking number of 22 million.
“Our original idea was just to do a sanity check on the existing number,” said one of the study’s authors, Edward Kaplan, a professor of operations research at the Yale School of Management. “Instead of a number which was smaller, we got a number that was 50 percent higher. That caused us to scratch our heads.”“There’s a number that everybody quotes, but when you actually dig down and say, ‘What is it based on?’ You find it’s based on one very specific survey and possibly an approach that has some difficulties. So we went in and just took a very different approach,” said another of the study’s authors, Jonathan Feinstein, a professor of Economics and Management.To arrive at their estimate, the authors used operational data such as deportations and visa overstays as well as demographic data such as death rates and immigration rates.“We combined these data using a demographic model that follows a very simple logic,” Kaplan said. “The population today is equal to the initial population plus everyone who came in minus everyone who went out. It’s that simple.”“The analysis we’ve done can be thought of as estimating the size of a hidden population,” he added. “People who are undocumented immigrants are not walking around with labels on their foreheads. . . . There are very few numbers we can point to and say, ‘This is carved in stone.'”The researchers said their goal in crunching the numbers was not a political one.“We wouldn’t want people to walk away from this research thinking that suddenly there’s a large influx happening now,” Feinstein commented. “It’s really something that happened in the past and maybe was not properly counted or documented.”
The study's data covers a 26 year period from 1990 to 2016. And while the methodology sounds interesting, it's very hard to say how accurate the data is.
But I think it's a safe bet that the 11.3 million illegal alien figure is wrong. Twenty two million sounds very high given what we know about the strain on our welfare, health care, and public education systems already. It's bad, but double the number of illegals would almost certainly be noticeable in public spending - unless the illegals are so far underground they don't use any public systems. If that were the case, how do you count them?
Many researchers always used the caveat "at least" 11.3 million illegals in the US. Now we're pretty sure it's much higher than that.
There has been very little critical commentary on the study, which isn't surprising given that it was just published on Friday. The bottom line is that decades of neglect, non-existent enforcement, and the deliberate application of policies that make entering the country illegally attractive and lucrative have resulted in a dilution of the value of US citizenship.
62M Immigrants and Their U.S.-Born Children Now Reside in
America
There are now an unprecedented nearly 62
million immigrants and their United States-born children residing in the
country, new analysis from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) finds.
Over 4M Foreigners Resettled in U.S. from Refugee-Producing
Countries Since 2000
In less than two decades, more than 4.1 million foreigners have legally
immigrated to the United States from countries that produce large numbers of
refugees.
Immigration
Moratorium Followed Last Period of Record U.S. Foreign-Born Levels
HERITAGE
FOUNDATION:
AMNESTY
WOULD DOUBLE U.S. POPULATION, POVERTY, HOUSING AND HOMELESS CRISIS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2010/03/heritage-foundation-amnesty-would-add.html
"Critics argue
that giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have
an immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically
black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct
competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien
population." JOHN BINDER
Census: Population to 420 million in 2060,
2/3rds immigrants, 79 million
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/census-population-to-420-million-in-2060-2-3rds-immigrants-79-million
Year Record
The immigrant percentage of the U.S.
population has hit 13.7 percent, near the 1910 record of 14.7 percent,
according to the latest release by the Census Bureau.
62M Immigrants and Their U.S.-Born Children Now Reside in
America
AP
Photo/David J. Phillip
20 Sep 20181,304
There are now an unprecedented nearly 62
million immigrants and their United States-born children residing in the
country, new analysis from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) finds.
Newly released analysis from CIS
researchers based on Census Bureau data reveals that there are about 61.6
million immigrants and their U.S.-born children — given birthright citizenship
— living across the country. There were 17.1 million U.S.-born minor children
of immigrants in the country as of 2017.
Immigrants and their U.S.-born
children now represent about one in five residents in America, a population
that is expected to increase should current legal immigration levels continue
unchanged and uncontrolled.
The U.S. is nearly alone in granting birthright citizenship to the children of
foreign nationals. For example, the U.S. and Canada are the two only developed
nations with birthright citizenship. On the other hand, countries such as
France, the United Kingdom, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, Italy, and Germany
all have either outlawed birthright citizenship or never had such a policy to
begin with.
Between 2010 and 2017, about 9.5
million immigrants resettled in the U.S. The total foreign-born population is
now 44.5 million, a 108-year record high, making up nearly 14 percent of the total country’s population.
In 1970, the total foreign-born
population was 9.5 million.
Every year, the U.S. admits more
than 1.5 million immigrants. By 2023, CIS researchers estimate that the legal
and illegal immigrant population of the U.S. will make up nearly 15
percent of the entire U.S. population.
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard about the high number of
Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison
It's not just a
short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment
approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of
healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as
a nation.
MEXICO WILL DOUBLE U.S.
POPULATION
By Tom Barrett
At the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also
through Canada) the United States will be completely over run with illegal
aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US
law to become citizens. In less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion,
ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will be the dominant population in the
United States.
MEXICO WILL DOUBLE U.S.
POPULATION
By Tom Barrett
At the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also
through Canada) the United States will be completely over run with illegal
aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US
law to become citizens. In less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion,
ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will be the dominant population in the
United States.
Over 4M Foreigners Resettled in U.S. from Refugee-Producing
Countries Since 2000
RAINER JENSEN/AFP/Getty Images
17 Sep 201837
In less than two decades, more than 4.1 million foreigners have legally
immigrated to the United States from countries that produce large numbers of
refugees.
Data
released by the White House on Monday revealed the mass legal immigration
levels at which the U.S. has admitted more immigrants than any other country in
the world.
As Breitbart News reported,
President Trump will reduce the number of refugees allowed to enter the U.S.
for Fiscal Year 2019 to no more than 30,000 admissions. This is merely a
cap for refugee resettlements and does not represent the number of refugees
that the administration seeks to resettle. For example, less than 20,000 foreign
refugees have been resettled in the country.
On
top of the more than 1.5 million foreign refugees resettled in the U.S. since
2000 — outpacing the population of Philadelphia — there have been more than 4.1
million legal immigrants admitted to the U.S. from refugee-producing countries.
In
t0tal, there have been nearly 11 million foreign
nationals admitted and resettled in the U.S. in the last decade. This is nearly
three million people larger than the population of New York City.
Immigration Moratorium Followed Last Period of Record
U.S. Foreign-Born Population Levelshttps://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/14/immigration-moratorium-followed-last-period-of-record-u-s-foreign-born-population-levels/ …
Immigration
Moratorium Followed Last Period of Record U.S. Foreign-Born Levels
The latest data from
the U.S. Census Bureau marks a nearly 108-year record high of immigration to
the country. In 2017, the foreign-born population boomed to 13.7 percent,
encompassing 44.5 million immigrants.
The
last time the U.S. foreign-born population was this high was in 1910 when
immigrants made up 14.7 percent of the total country’s population.
The
country’s last immigration boom — between 1900 and 1920 — was eventually met
with a near 16. Between 1925 and 1966, the yearly
U.S. legal immigration level did not exceed 327,000 admissions, a
four-decades-long near moratorium that allowed the massive inflows of
immigrants from before 1925 the ability to assimilate.
Every
year, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 foreign nationals, with the vast majority
deriving from family-based chain migration. By 2023, the Center for Immigration
Studies estimates that the legal and illegal immigrant population of the U.S.
will make up nearly 15 percent of the entire U.S. population.
HERITAGE
FOUNDATION:
AMNESTY
WOULD DOUBLE U.S. POPULATION, POVERTY, HOUSING AND HOMELESS CRISIS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2010/03/heritage-foundation-amnesty-would-add.html
"Critics argue
that giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have
an immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically
black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct
competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien
population." JOHN BINDER
"Additionally, under current legal immigration
laws, if given amnesty, the illegal alien population would be allowed to bring
an unlimited number of their foreign relatives to the U.S. This population
could boost already high legal immigration levels to an unprecedented high. An
amnesty for illegal aliens would also likely triple the number of
border-crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border." JOHN BINDER
Census: Population to 420 million in 2060,
2/3rds immigrants, 79 million
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/census-population-to-420-million-in-2060-2-3rds-immigrants-79-million
by Paul Bedard
An
immigrant woman from Honduras carries her baby inside the Catholic Charities of
the Rio Grande Valley on Saturday, June 23, 2018, in McAllen, Texas. Families,
who have been processed and released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
wait inside the facility before continuing their journey to cities across the
United States.
David
J. Phillip/AP
A new analysis of the impact on
unrestricted immigration into the United States shows that the nation’s
population will jump to 420 million by 2060, driven by an explosion in
immigrants and their offspring.
Using Census Bureau data, the
group Negative Population Growth said that
current policies suggest that 79 million immigrants will boost the population
during the period.
“Under current immigration policy
U.S. population will rise to 420 million in 2060, versus 341 million if no
immigration was allowed over the 2012 to 2060 period. This implies that
immigrants arriving over the next 45 years, and their U.S. born children and
grandchildren, will add 79 million to U.S. population by 2060. More than
two-thirds of U.S. population growth over this period will be due to
immigration,” said the new analysis.
The report reviews some of the costs
of legal and illegal immigration on the country and taxpayers and makes the
case for a national population policy that considers that impact.
It highlights, for example, the 1965
reforms to the Immigration and Nationality Act which were to limit immigration
but actually fed it through so-called “chain migration,” where one new
immigrant, in an example shown, could bring in some 19 relatives.
The report also puts a spotlight on
the children of illegal immigrants born in the United States who automatically
become citizens. It describes those babies as “deportation insurance.” The
report said:
The U.S.-born baby is, of course, a
U.S. citizen, whose illegal alien parents are eligible to receive, on the
baby’s behalf, food stamps, nutrition from the Women, Infants, and Children
(WIC) program, and numerous tax benefits, including the EITC.
Most importantly, the newborn is deportation
insurance for its parents. Illegal aliens facing deportation can argue that to
deport one or more parents would create an “extreme hardship” for the new baby.
If an immigration officer agrees, we’ve added a new adult to the nation’s
population. At age 21 the former birthright citizen baby can formally apply for
green cards for parents and siblings, and they, in turn, can start their own
immigration chains
Hit 44.5 Million, Near 108-
Year Record
AP Photo/Jae C. Hong
14 Sep 2018638
The immigrant percentage of the U.S.
population has hit 13.7 percent, near the 1910 record of 14.7 percent,
according to the latest release by the Census Bureau.
In 2017, 13.7 percent of people (one
in 7.3 people) in the United States were immigrants, up from 13.5 percent in
2016, and up from 5 percent (one in 20 people) in 1970, according to the
bureau’s data.
The rising share means 44.5 million
people in a population of 325.7 million people were born abroad. That 44.5
million includes roughly 22 million naturalized citizens, 11 million
other residents, including more than 1.5 million foreign temporary
visa-workers, plus roughly 11 million illegal immigrants, according to the
bureau:
The millions of migrants are
concentrated in the coastal metropolises, such as Los Angeles and New
York, but many are migrating into interior states. According to the New York Times:
New York and California, states with
large immigrant populations, both had increases of less than six percent since
2010. But foreign-born populations rose by 20 percent in Tennessee, 13 percent
in Ohio, 12 percent in South Carolina and 20 percent in Kentucky over the same
period.
The recent inflow includes
a rising percentage of Asians from China, Vietnam, India, said the New York Times.
Brookings Institution analysis of
that data shows that 41 percent of the people who said they arrived since 2010
came from Asia. Just 39 percent were from Latin America. About 45 percent were
college educated, the analysis found, compared with about 30 percent of those
who came between 2000 and 2009.
The Asian inflow
include includes many college graduates because many of them are
immigrating via the various business-backed programs for college-graduate
visa-workers.
The Census Bureau may have
undercounted the number of illegal immigrants, ensuring the immigrant
population now exceeds the 1910 percentage, NBC News reported:
Illegal immigrants can be more
difficult for surveyors to locate due to informal living arrangements, and some
may avoid being included in surveys for fear of being reported to the
government, researchers say.
Jeffrey Passel, a demographer at Pew
Research Center, has estimated that the actual immigrant population is likely 3
percent to 5 percent higher than the number in the Census Bureau’s American
Community Survey.
A chart by
the Washington Post suggests
that this huge wave of migrants has changed politics by giving Democrats’
identity-politics ideology an electoral lock in counties where
immigrants comprise more than 20 percent of the population:
The New York Times report, however, demurely ignored
the political and economic impact of this huge wage of workers,
consumers, and renters.
Some economic impacts are obvious,
for example, immigrants expand the economy by working, consuming and renting
real-estate. Some also raise the productivity of Americans by inventing new
products, importing new goods, or develop novel services that allow Americans
to produce more wealth or enjoyment per hour.
But many less-skilled migrants play
their largest role by simply shifting small slices of wealth from person to
person, for example, by competing up rents in their neighborhood or by
competing down wages in their workplace. The crudest examples can be seen in
agriculture.
European farms tend to buy
labor-saving machines from well-paid European manufacturing workers because
their farmworkers’ wages are high, but many U.S. farm companies simply use
cheap legal and illegal immigrant labor while sharing the savings from not
buying machines between profit-seeking investors and penny-counting consumers.
Next
time you enjoy radishes in your salad, remember the farmworkers like these
Oxnard workers, who harvest the food that we eat. #WeFeedYou #Calor #Ovetime4FarmWorkers
Of course, that cheap-labor business
practice leaves Americans taxpayers to carry the off-work costs of immigrants,
such as welfare programs, civic turmoil, Diversity, education
costs for migrants’ children, and the occasional murder of an Iowa jogger,
a massacre in a Florida nightclub, or the destruction of the Twin Towers in
2011.
But the immigration is not happening
in a vacuum — it is happening as a vast wave of technology allows companies and
investors to move products and assets (such as cheap migrant labor) around the
world, at very low cost. This technological change has liberated societies to
vastly enrich themselves — see China for example — even as it also seems to
centralize power and wealth.
There is plenty of data to suggest that this combination of technological change
and Congress’ passage of the 1965 immigration law have together since shifted a
huge volume of wealth from younger, working Americans towards the older
Americans who own real-estate, stocks, or companies.
That wage-pressure process began
first among the interchangeable, blue-collar, unskilled Americans — such as
farm workers — but it is shifting up the economic ladder to hit
interchangeable, college-educated Americans. In President Donald Trump’s
economy, blue-collar Americans are gaining amid modest restrictions on
immigration while middle-class Americans are seeing slower gains as companies import more cheap college-graduates and also export their jobs to expanding foreign populations of clever, hardworking college-graduates.
This economic shift is reflected in
another important economic change — the declining importance of Americans’
wages and salaries compared to other Americans’ dividends and stock prices. As
the New York Times noted September 12:
Data from the Federal Reserve show
that over the last decade and a half, the proportion of family income from
wages has dropped from nearly 70 percent to just under 61 percent. It’s an
extraordinary shift, driven largely by the investment profits of the very
wealthy. In short, the people who possess tradable assets, especially stocks,
have enjoyed a recovery that Americans dependent on savings or income from
their weekly paycheck have yet to see. Ten years after the financial crisis,
getting ahead by going to work every day seems quaint, akin to using the phone
book to find a number or renting a video at Blockbuster” …
In 2016, net worth among white
middle-income families was 19 percent below 2007 levels, adjusted for
inflation. But among blacks, it was down 40 percent, and Hispanics saw a drop
of 46 percent. For many, old-fashioned hard work has simply not been a viable
path out of this hole. After unemployment peaked in the fall of 2009, it took
years for joblessness to return to pre-recession levels. Slack in the labor
market left the employed and unemployed alike with little leverage to demand
raises, even as corporate profits surged.
Maybe it was inevitable that when
half the population watches its wages stagnate while the other half gets rich
in the market, the result is President Donald Trump and Brexit.
Unsurprisingly, many legislators are
under severe pressure from donors to preserve the current national economic
strategy of growth-by-immigration. In February 2018, for example, a loose
alliance of business-first Republicans, pro-migration Democrats, and
progressive media blocked President Donald Trump’s “Four Pillars” immigration
reforms which would shift the United States back towards a
low-immigration/high-wage economy.
Economists, investors, talking heads
and political advocates in the Democratic and Republican parties are deeply reluctant to draw any connection between the immigration inflow of
consumers, workers, and renters, and the economic shift from wages to stocks.
But the linkage is often hinted at.
For example, Noah Smith, a pro-immigration, pro-diversity writer for Bloomberg News empire, wrote a column in
July 2018 saying that the 1924 immigration cutbacks helped create the
1929 crash:
The housing crash of the mid-1920s
might well have been a direct result of the curtailment of immigration. And if
the Great Depression and/or the stock crash of 1929 was caused or exacerbated
by that housing crash, there’s a clear and direct link between immigration
restriction and the U.S.’s worst economic crisis of the 20th century. The
reduction in agglomeration effects reported by Ager and Hansen probably also
contributed to lower corporate earnings and sapped vitality in American cities.
Yet Smith is silent about the
flip-side of immigration cuts — the impact of the 1965
immigration expansion law, which has added up to 44.5 million consumers,
workers and renters to the United States’ marketplace.
Immigration Economics
Overall, the Washington-imposed economic
policy of economic growth via immigration shifts wealth from young people
towards older people by flooding the
market with cheap white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor.
Four million young Americans will
join the workforce this year, but the federal government will also
import 1.1 million legal immigrants, and allow an army of at least 2
million visa-workers to work U.S. jobs, alongside asylum-claiming migrants and
illegal aliens.
That flood of outside labor spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar
and white-collar employees. The policy also drives up real estate prices, widens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and
their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions. Immigration also pulls investment and wealth away from
heartland states because investment flows towards the large immigrant
populations living in the coastal states.
.
Note to
Dems: High immigration population equals lower GDP
Immigration
Brief: Steven Camarota Details the Immigrant Population
Anchor
Baby Population in U.S. Exceeds One Year of American Births
The number of United States-born children who
were given birthright citizenship despite at least one of their parents being
an illegal alien living in the country now outnumbers one year of all American
births.
Rep. Yoder’s India Lobby Offers $$$ to Jump Line for Green Cards
A group of Indian visa-workers is offering to pay the federal government
$1,500 per family to jump the line for green cards, according to a
friendly report by the McClatchy news bureau.
Note to
Dems: High immigration population equals lower GDP
Back in 2010, when the investing community was still eager about
the emerging economies, there was the BRIC ETF you could buy (still can), which
represented a basket of investible companies in Brazil, Russia, India, and
China. The theory was that with the former two, natural resources
would be pillaged in low-regulation environments, and the latter two had to do
with an economic growth model being inextricably linked to booming
populations.
The theory was that the two production economies of Brazil and
Russia, mainly oil, would be balanced out by two emerging consumption
economies. The problem was that shortly thereafter, the government
of Brazil took possession of Petrobras in a thuggish move, and investors got
scared of these economies of socialist and oligarchic fiat (read:
Venezuela). In addition, the price of oil eventually dropped as U.S.
production ramped up and an oil glut kept prices eternally low.
So all the ETF had at that point was India and China, the two
behemoth nations in terms of robust breeding and the emerging consumer
story. But that theory has not born out. What we are
instead seeing is that human population growth stories are not automatically
investible winners. Not anymore. Technology and
automation are increasingly making dense population countries unstable, as
low-skilled manual jobs are not as necessary as they once
were. China is more worried about pacifying an open revolt if its
1.4 billion people ever get hungry enough to engage in another Tiananmen Square
demonstration, where easily over 10,000 people were slaughtered. And
India can't seem to get out of its own clumsy way long enough to make any
traction with its GDP – partially because it is addicted to smothering
regulations, but also, it has so much exposure to cultural poverty due to its
inundated population zones without concomitant employment.
Population growth stories are supposedly consumption-based
economic models but instead are saddled with relatively higher welfare demands
placed on the subject countries in order to pacify the
poverty. Consumption does not produce prosperity any more than
eating a dozen Krispy Kremes produces a handsome physique. Effort is
required for that. Production is required for wealth creation. Consumption
means only that subsistence is reached. Nothing more. And
no real wealth accrued beyond subsistence.
And yet, here at home, we have Democrats who preach that we need
more immigrants and refugees for our economic growth. What planet
are they living on? Okay: We know they are being their usual
disingenuous selves and that they want foreign mercenaries hired by welfare to
vote for them, but their base buys the low-information agit-prop as if it were
something that should be taught in college.
No, wait – maybe
it actually is.
Consumption-based economies are all the rage in Democrat
circles. "Supply-siders," aka production economies, that
require investment (read: tax cuts) are all about those evil
Republicans. To the left, you don't need capital accumulation or
savings to produce growth. All you need is government
handouts.
What we are seeing is that further immigration into the U.S. from
Mexico is creating greater drains on our welfare rolls as well as
infrastructure, our schools, and our emergency rooms and hospitals. It
also removes low-skilled jobs from American citizens. Citizens then
go out and apply for unemployment insurance because they can't find employment
due to illegals occupying those low-skilled spaces, a double-whammy, and all of
it just to help Democrats get elected.
No, immigration does not automatically convert to a nation's
wealth. It can do quite the opposite, in fact, and drain it that
much faster and liquidate the treasury, a treasury that the Democrats are all
too eager to pillage in order to buy votes from other foreign nationals who
walk across our border and give them the vote as fast as possible.
Immigration
Brief: Steven Camarota Details the Immigrant Population
CIS Video, January 9, 2018
Video: https://www.cis.org/Camarota/Immigration-Brief-Immigrant-Population
Anchor
Baby Population in U.S. Exceeds One Year of American Births
Associated
Press
The number of United States-born children who
were given birthright citizenship despite at least one of their parents being
an illegal alien living in the country now outnumbers one year of all American
births.
A new Congressional Budget Office
(CBO) report reveals the booming number of U.S.-born children to illegal
aliens who are given automatic citizenship, forever anchoring their families in
the U.S.
These children are commonly known as “anchor babies,” as they
are able to eventually bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the
U.S. through the process known as “chain migration.” Every two new immigrants
to the U.S. brings an estimated seven foreign relatives with them.
In
1993, Harry Reid famously said on the Senate floor that "no sane
country" would grand birthright citizenship to anchor babies. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/26/cbo-at-least-4-5m-anchor-babies-in-u-s/ …
Rep. Yoder’s India Lobby Offers $$$ to Jump Line for Green Cards
AP Photo/Aijaz Rahi, File
13 Sep 2018144
A group of Indian visa-workers is offering to pay the federal government
$1,500 per family to jump the line for green cards, according to a
friendly report by the McClatchy news bureau.
The proposed trade would send just
$1,500 from each Indian family to the federal treasury in exchange for a
fast-track to the hugely valuable prize of citizenship for at least 100,000
outsourcing-workers and their family members.
That small payment would save the
Indians from paying lawyers’ fees, allow them to compete directly against
American professionals for jobs, and allow them to quickly begin the
chain-migration process for their many parents and siblings. The
money could be used to fund the Federal Emergency Management Agency,
say the advocates, who are also hoping their proposal will be supported by
their ally, Kansas GOP Rep. Kevin Yoder.
“It goes from insulting to
preposterous to propose such a thing,” countered Jessica Vaughan, policy
director at the Center for Immigration Studies. She continued:
It is insulting for them to think they should get to jump in line ahead
of others for paying a ridiculously low sum of money, and it is
preposterous [for them] to think they somehow are preferred immigrants over
millions of others who have been sponsored and are waiting their turn in
No comments:
Post a Comment