Across the dimensions of her memory, her relationships, and her morality, all indications are that Christine Blasey Ford is either lying or deluded.
Memory
Her memory array is not plausible, given the events in her allegation. Have you ever been in a situation of natural disaster, crime, or accident wherein you were momentarily in fear of losing your life? Do you remember the location you were in? At such moments, the sensory portals open wide, creating an array of indelible memories, especially regarding the location. In the case of an attack, the avalanche of sensory input involved in the will to survive tends to obscure rather than clarify the identity of the attacker. This is why there are so many false accusations of rape. You also do not remember what you ate for lunch that day.
Blasey Ford's memory array is inconsistent with traumatic memory formation. She does not remember the location. She remembers "100%" the identity of Brett Kavanaugh, the fact that she conveniently drank only one beer enabling a clear head to remember only Brett. The assault is often described as a horrible crime. That is felony inflation. The only thing that made the incident important is the identity of the accused, which is also the only alleged fact Christine Blasey Ford claims to remember.
Nor is this a scenario where a so-called repressed memory develops. Repressed memories typically develop when the sexual abuse is of such shock and betrayal, such as incestuous rape, that the mind dissociates from reality and the unbearable memory submerges into the unconscious. It is not plausible that a fifteen-year-old girl at a party momentarily held down by an acquaintance and prevented from screaming would develop a repressed memory, said memory unlocked thirty years later at the time of a home remodeling project. This is just nonsense.
Here is a psychodynamic speculation that would not hold up in a court of law, so I won't send a bill. As an unconscious defense mechanism, the mind tends to transfer memories of trauma, or expiate its own guilt, by projecting the least threatening and most physically safe person into the role of perpetrator. It's also smart in terms of the accused not coming back around and knocking your block off. Blasey Ford confabulized a drama wherein the most gentlemanly and highest achieving boy became her attacker, while type casting another popular boy, Mark Judge, as her rescuer. Judge also denies being at the party and witnessing the event.
Relationships
The people who know Christine Blasey Ford are nowhere to be found. When Brett Kavanaugh was accused, hundreds of friends and associates going back to his childhood gathered around him to attest to his character and integrity. No one, parents, family, friends, or colleagues, is standing by Christine Blasey Ford. Not only is no one (save the husband, somewhat) corroborating her charges, but no one is choosing to publicly attest to her character or integrity. During the hearing, Kavanaugh's supporters surrounded him. Blasey Ford was alone with the lawyers Dianne Feinstein sent her to. It appears the people closest to her either don't believe her or don't trust her.
Morality
Christine Blasey Ford has wrapped herself in the moral cloak of civic responsibility, yet she is acting like a character from a dumb blond joke. Apart from the objective falsehoods such as the lies that she can't fly commercial and that she passed a lie-detector test, her behavior is a far cry from a civically responsible adult. She seems like a middle school girl peeking out from the hair that covers her face. Blasey Ford is avoiding the most basic facts about this monumentally significant case, though it is driven by her words. She didn't know who is paying her attorneys, or who arranged for her lie-detector test, or if she took it on the same day as her grandmother's funeral. Incredibly, she claimed that she didn't know that the Senate Judiciary committee had offered to interview her in a confidential setting in California. Everyone in America but her knew that. If true, her ignorance resulted from a major ethical offense committed by her attorneys. They needed her in front of the cameras, whatever harm might befall her or her children. If her claim was sincere, then she stopped accepting information about the case weeks ago.
Dr. Ford offered only two pieces of documentary evidence supporting her claim: lie-detector results and therapy notes from 2012. In both cases, the underlying data were withheld. This is not the behavior of an ethical, published psychologist. She is a professional number-cruncher. How many blonds does it take to find out about a cool half-million in a GoFundMe account? At least one blond more than Christine Blasey Ford, who chooses to dwell in uninterrupted California dreamin' and let the grown-ups tell her what to do.
Anyone who calls Christine Blasey Ford a credible witness has been brainwashed by the "white privilege" and "toxic masculinity" cults and is in need of kidnapping and deprogramming to regain his common sense.
SEXUAL PREDATORS AND THEIR ACCOMPLICES GO AFTER KAVANAUGH
From Hillary Clinton to George Soros.
October 1, 2018
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism
Hillary Clinton, the spouse of a serial sexual predator, did a tour of the morning shows to attack Republicans and Brett Kavanaugh.
On MSNBC, Clinton told Rachel Maddow that the benefit of the doubt belonged not to the accused, but the accuser.
In a smarmy chat session with Stephen Colbert, whose old boss and patron was just forced to resign for numerous counts of sexual harassment and at least one outright sexual assault, Hillary insisted on an FBI investigation.
"It would be very easy for the FBI to go back and finish the background investigation, to investigate these charges," insisted a woman who had described her own husband's accusers as "bimbo eruptions".
Juanita Broaddrick, who had accused Bill Clinton of raping her, also accused Hillary of threatening her.
Bill Clinton’s alleged assaults were not carried out in high school. But there will be no investigation of what a powerful politician did. There’s no interest among Democrats in revisiting the Clinton case. And yet Hillary’s hypocrisy in demanding an investigation of Brett Kavanaugh, despite her work covering up her husband’s victimization of women, is typical among the Democrats and their media allies.
Senate Democrats launched their smear of Kavanaugh despite the fact that two top figures within their ranks had become notorious for their abuse of women. Ted Kennedy’s crimes were so severe that they have become practically legendary. Al Franken was forced to resign, after numerous women came forward to accuse him of groping them, but retains strong support among the Democrat donor base.
That includes George Soros, who attacked Senator Kirsten Gillibrand over her criticism of Franken.
Senator Whitehouse’s staff recently relayed a smear of Kavanaugh falsely claiming that the nominee had raped someone on a boat in Rhode Island in 1985. That smear has since been retracted, and has become the subject of a Senate Judiciary Committee criminal referral of the smearer. But Senator Whitehouse was far less enthusiastic when he was asked about the Democrat attacks on Gillibrand over Franken.
The militant Kavanaugh basher refused to defend Gillibrand against attacks from Dem donors and of Franken, only said, "I think this was a very tough result for Al, but he did make his own choice. And I leave that for him to have made.”
While Soros-funded organizations protest Kavanaugh, the leftist grandmaster has been vocal in his support for Franken. Soros complained about due process for Franken, but wants to deny due process to Kavanaugh.
Soros funded groups have been caught handing out cash to anti-Kavanaugh protesters. But where were these protesters, some who claim to be victims of sexual assault, when Franken was in the Senate?
If they’re really there to agitate for victims of sexual assaults, why are they taking money from George Soros, who has sided with an accused sexual predator over the women who claim to be his victims?
Soros’ MoveOn activist group has been distributing a fundraising letter for Senator Joe Donnelly, after his refusal to approve Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, by Senator Kamala Harris. While MoveOn touts the willingness of Dem senators to “believe” Christine Blasey Ford, its funder is quite reluctant to believe the numerous women who came forward to speak out against Franken. Meanwhile Ford’s lawyer, Debra Katz, is the vice chair of the board of an organization funded by, among others, George Soros.
Then there’s Planned Parenthood, which has been loudly assailing Kavanaugh. That’s the same organization which issued a statement mourning the loss of Senator Ted Kennedy, a serial predator whose actions led to the death of at least one woman, and who assaulted a number of other women.
"As Gaviglio enters the room, the six-foot-two, 225-plus-pound Kennedy grabs the five-foot-three, 103-pound waitress and throws her on the table," a GQ story related. "Several glasses and a crystal candlestick are broken. Kennedy then picks her up from the table and throws her on Dodd, who is sprawled in a chair. With Gaviglio on Dodd's lap, Kennedy jumps on top and begins rubbing his genital area against hers, supporting his weight on the arms of the chair."
Dodd is former Senator Chris Dodd. Despite his alleged actions, he got a job heading Hollywood’s Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). That’s the same entertainment industry that claims to be battling sexual harassment and whose celebrities rush to outdo each other in attacking Kavanaugh.
The former Senator had allegedly also tried to block the release of a movie critical of Ted Kennedy.
Planned Parenthood had also fiercely touted serial sexual predators like Bob Filner, Bill Clinton and Al Franken. Planned Parenthood had actually described Franken, whose victims included a feminist choir member as, “a leader for women”.
It claimed that Bob Filner, the Democrat who groped half of San Diego, “has defended women”.
“It tells survivors of sexual assault that they don’t matter,” a Planned Parenthood email now declares. "And it sends a message that partisan politics trumps not only fairness, but basic human compassion. Speak out now: This nomination is a disgrace. Brett Kavanaugh must withdraw.”
Planned Parenthood possesses as much “basic human compassion” for women as it does for children. It has repeatedly promoted Democrat serial victimizers of women for purely partisan reasons.
And when Senator Flake and Senator Coons went to take their victory lap for forcing an FBI investigation of Kavanaugh’s high school years, they did it on 60 Minutes, a show whose former executive producer, Jeff Fager, was recently forced to resign over sexual harassment allegations, on CBS, whose boss, Les Moonves, was recently also forced out over sexual harassment and sexual assault allegations.
Then Saturday Night Live, Franken’s old show whose alumni had issued a statement of support for the alleged groper, then invited Matt Damon, who has admitted, after first denying it, that he was aware of some of what Harvey Weinstein, the serial rapist who made his career, had been doing to women, to mock Kavanaugh.
The gang coming after Kavanaugh consists of sexual predators and their accomplices.
The ranks of the Democrats are rotten with rapists and with their enablers, collaborators and colluders. The news networks taking cheap shots at Kavanaugh are staffed by men who are one story away from being forced to resign. The entertainment industry passionately advocating against Kavanaugh is run by compulsive predators. And the Senate Democrats and the lefty groups attacking Kavanaugh are guilty of the very crimes that they are trying to lay on the heads of Kavanaugh and the Republicans.
When an alleged rapist’s wife appears a network formerly run by an alleged rapist to condemn Kavanaugh, it’s time for Republicans to stop playing defense and go on the offense instead.
Nolte: Gallup Hides Big News that Hillary Clinton’s Favorability Just Hit Record Low
Hillary Clinton’s favorability rating hit a record low of 36 percent, Gallup reluctantly reports — even though the polling firm has measured Clinton’s favorability going all the way back to 1992.
Gallup’s laughable attempt to bury this bad news for Madam Hillary can be found in its ridiculously generic headline: “Hillary Clinton’s Favorable Rating Still Low.”
Obviously, that is not the news in this poll; the news is that Hillary has hit a record low.
Gallup’s sub-headlines also bury the lede. The first reads, “Hillary Clinton’s favorable rating at 36%.”
Again, nothing about this being a record.
The second sub-headline reads “Clinton remains a polarizing political figure,” as though 64 percent of Americans not seeing her as favorable is not about as close to a consensus as you will find in a country split 50/50 on pretty much everything else.
Finally, at the end of the first paragraph, we are at long last informed that this is a “record low.”
Prior to this poll, Hillary’s record low favorable rating was 39 percent.
What’s more, President Trump’s favorability rating is a full 5 points higher than Hillary’s — 41 percent, and this is despite the fact we have a corrupt establishment media battering and blistering him 24/7, while Hillary is treated like the wronged woman who would be president were it not for those damn dirty Russians.
Moreover, Gallup is always an outlier, an unreliable pollster that for some inexplicable reason polls “all adults,” instead of aiming for the much more reliable numbers you get when screening for “registered voters” or “likely voters.”
Oh wait, it is not “inexplicable” at all — “all adult” polls always come out better for Democrats.
A good example of this is Gallup’s weekly poll gauging Trump’s job approval. If you look at the Real Clear Politics poll of polls, Gallup is the only pollster polling the utterly useless “all adults.” Because of this, Gallup usually comes in with the lowest approval ratings for Trump — at least until the even more unreliable Quinnipiac stumbles in.
But think about how partisan a polling company has to be to hide the big news that a major public figure like Hillary Clinton has just hit a record low in favorability — her lowest in more than a quarter century of polling.
In this world of social media, where headlines are everything, if you want clicks, you put your big news in that headline. So it is obvious Gallup did not want that headline out there — did not want Twitter and Facebook spreading the news that Precious Hillary is scraping an all-new barrel bottom.
Another deception in Gallup’s so-called analysis is the ludicrous premise Hillary has retreated from the political stage.
“She has tended to be quite popular when she is no longer seen as a purely political figure,” Gallup accurately explains, before adding this bunk: “Clinton’s 2016 loss has largely thrust her off the political stage, though she released a memoir of the campaign last year and has made periodic public appearances.”
What in heaven’s name is Gallup talking about? Hillary is everywhere — on top of her sore loser book tour, she’s all over — on Twitter, on talk shows, speaking engagements, interviews, and Murphy Brown cameos.
In my 30-plus years of watching politics, never before have I seen a losing presidential candidate so desperate to remain in the limelight. This even includes John Kerry and John McCain, who returned to the U.S. Senate after their respective ’04 and ’08 losses.
What makes Hillary’s record low even more remarkable is that during the early ’90s, most especially in the early days of her husband’s ’92 presidential campaign and in ’93 and ’94 when, as First Lady, she lobbied to make Hillarycare (government-run healthcare) the law of the land, few people in America were more disliked than Hillary. She was never more off-putting, dishonest, and polarizing. But even that cannot top her latest era, the era of the sore loser with the secret email server who refuses to leave the stage.
As of now, only 77 percent of Democrats have a favorable opinion of Hillary, which statistically ties with a previous low of 76 percent. Only 30 percent of Independents and four percent of Republicans agree.
Meanwhile, since winning the election, Trump’s favorability has climbed from 34 percent to 41 percent — even in this dumb poll.
Will the Kavanaugh fallout impact Democrats at the polls?
Earlier this year, House Democrats disclosed their slogan for the midterm elections: "For the People." The slogan was unveiled by Illinois rep. Cheri Bustos, co-chair of House Democrats' messaging arm, and her colleagues after a private meeting with members. While "For the People" sounds all-inclusive, recent events and comments by a number of Democrats have cast serious doubt on the sincerity of this message. More particularly, in the past month, Democrats have verbally attacked some in the judiciary, homosexuals, and men. This could end up costing them come November.
Judiciary
The confirmation process involving Judge Kavanaugh provides a sad yet perfect example of the hypocrisy of the Democratic slogan. Since his appointment, Judge Kavanaugh and his family have been the victims of a vicious and vile character assassination for the sole purpose of keeping a conservative-minded judge off of the bench.
The Senate Democrats, including Dianne Feinstein, launched this attack toobstruct and delay Kavanaugh's confirmation until after the midterms in hopes that they regain the Senate (which would allow them to block any of President Trump's conservative appointments for the Supreme Court). The devastating attack on Kavanaugh and his family had nothing to do with helping the people of this country. To the contrary, and according to Thomas Jipping, "Democrats have slowed the confirmation process to a slog because they can, but it's taking a serious toll on the judiciary. Vacancies are now more than 30 percent higher than when Trump took office, and at the level they are today, the American people who must bring matters to the courts are getting shortchanged."
This politicized attack on Kavanaugh and his family has led people to Walk Away from the Democratic Party. This could have an impact at the polls in the upcoming elections.
Men
Not only did some Democrats verbally attack Kavanaugh and his family, but Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) of the Senate Judiciary Committee instructed the men of this country to "shut up." Hirono expected "the enlightened men in our country" to "rise up to say, 'We cannot continue the victimization and the smearing of someone like Dr. Ford.'" She then blamed men for perpetuating this type of action.
Hirono's ill advised comments about the men of the country do not align with the Democrats' purported desire to work "for the people." To the contrary, her unwarranted generalizations about all men were nonsensical and divisive. According to Senator Lindsey Graham, "I know I'm a single white male from South Carolina and I'm told I should shut up, but I will not shut up, if that's okay," adding that the experience had been "hell" for Kavanaugh and "the most unethical sham since I've been in politics."
Hirono's statement also fired up the Republican base:
The sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh have sparked a wave of unbridled anger and anxiety from many Republican men, who say they are in danger of being swept up by false accusers who are biased against them."This eruption of male resentment now seems likely to play a defining role in the midterm elections just five weeks away, contrasting with a burst of enthusiasm among women propelling Democratic campaigns and inspired by the national #MeToo reckoning over sexual assault and gender roles.
Time will tell how this translates at the voting booth.
Sexual Orientation
Following Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, Senator Lindsey Graham sent a tweet strongly defending Judge Kavanaugh. In response, Rosie O'Donnell verbally attacked Graham, calling him a "closeted idiot." Kathy Griffin "joined in on the gay-bashing," referring to Graham as a "she" and calling him "Miss Lindsey Graham" in a tweet. Jimmy Kimmel also "engaged in gay-bashing, comparing Graham to Liberace, a famous gay performer." Finally, "HBO host Bill Maher went even lower, not only joking about Graham being gay, but poking at the late John McCain as well. Maher joked that Graham needed the 'stabilizing influence of his dead boyfriend.'"
These statements are not unifying; they malign people based on their sexual orientation.
While it is commendable for the government to work "for the people," recent comments and statements by various Democrats raise some red flags. There is an old saying that "if your actions do not prove the truth of your words, then your words are nothing more than lies." While Democrats want the American public to believe they are "for the people," recent comments against people in various sects of society have cast serious doubt about the sincerity of this message. In the past month alone, Democrats have verbally attacked a member of the judiciary and his family, stigmatized all of the men in the country following the alleged incident involving Dr. Ford, and mocked one or more people based on their (alleged) sexual orientation.
Come November, if the American people reject this slogan as an insincere ruse, it could cost the Democrats at the polls!
Mr. Hakim's articles have been published in The Daily Caller, The Federalist, The Western Journal, American Thinker, WND, and other online publications.
https://thoughtfullyconservative.wordpress.com
Twitter: @Elad3599
Kamala Harris Presents Letter Claiming Kavanaugh & Friend Repeatedly Raped ‘Jane Doe’ in Car
The Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh last Wednesday regarding a letter delivered to Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) in which an anonymous woman claims she was repeatedly raped by the judge without providing any details to investigate.
According to committee transcripts released Sunday, the accuser, who signed the mysterious letter as “Jane Doe,” alleges Kavanaugh and a friend raped her “several times” after giving her a lift home from a party — making no attempt to claim a time or place for the lurid story.
The accuser claims Kavanaugh groped her, slapped her, and force her to perform sexual acts. “They forced me to go into the backseat and took 2 turns raping me several times each. They dropped me off 3 two blocks from my home,” the accuser wrote, claiming the pair told her, “No one will believe if you tell. Be a good girl.”
The letter, marked with the word “urgent,” did not include a return address, nor did it offer clues regarding the accuser’s background. “A group of white men, powerful senators who won’t believe me, will come after me” if I reveal the incident, the accuser wrote, prompting observers to speculate the sender could be a minority.
The accusation was met with a vehement denial from Kavanaugh, who characterized the allegation as nothing short of “ridiculous.”
“Nothing ever – anything like that, nothing,” the Supreme Court nominee told senators concerning the accusation. “I mean, that’s – the whole thing is just a crock, farce, wrong, didn’t happen, not anything close.”
Read the full letter below (Spaces added for easier reading):
Dear, Senator Grassley, et al.The current situation regarding the accusations made by Dr. Ford against Brett Kavanaugh have prompted me to write you today. I have moved on with my life since he forced himself on me as well. The times were so different, and I didn’t expect to be taken seriously, embarrass my family, be believed at all. I was at a party with a friend. I had been drinking. She left with another boy, leaving me to find my own way home. Kavanaugh and a friend offered me a ride home. I don’t know the other boy’s name. I was in his car to go home. His friend was behind me in the backseat. Kavanaugh kissed me forcefully.I told him I only wanted a ride home. Kavanaugh continued to grope me over my clothes, forcing his kisses on me and putting his hand under my sweater. ‘No,’ I yelled at him. The boy in the backseat reached around, putting his hand over my mouth and holding my arm to keep me in the car. I screamed into his hand. Kavanaugh continued his forcing himself on me. He pulled up my sweater and bra exposing my breasts, and reached into my panties, inserting his fingers into my vagina. My screams were silenced by the boy in the backseat covering my mouth and groping me as well. Kavanaugh slapped me and told me to be quiet and forced me to perform oral sex on him. He climaxed in my mouth. They forced me to go into the backseat and took turns raping me several times each.They dropped me off two blocks from my home. ‘No one will believe if you tell. Be a good girl,’ he told me. Watching what has happened to Anita Hill and Dr. Ford has me petrified to come forward in person or even provide my name. A group of white men, powerful senators who won’t believe me, will come after me. Like Dr. Ford, I’m a teacher, I have an education, a family, a child, a home. I have credibility. Just because something happens a long time ago, because a rape victim doesn’t want to personally come forward, does not mean something can’t be true.Jane Doe, Oceanside, California.
On Monday, the White House issued revised guidance to the FBI that agents can interview anyone they deem relevant as part of their investigation of Kavanaugh. President Donald Trump ordered the FBI to reopen Kavanaugh’s background investigation Friday after several women accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
Speaking at a White House Rose Garden event, President Trump told reporters that he continues to support Kavanaugh, describing him as a “fine man.” “I think he’s a great scholar … he focused on being number one at Yale, on being number one in high school, at being number one at law,” the president added. “I can so understand that.”
Kavanaugh has strongly denied all allegations, issuing the following statement through the White House on Friday:
“Throughout this process, I’ve been interviewed by the FBI, I’ve done a number of ‘background’ calls directly with the Senate, and yesterday, I answered questions under oath about every topic the Senators and their counsel asked me. I’ve done everything they have requested and will continue to cooperate.”
According to multiple reports, the investigation could wind down as earlier as Monday or Tuesday.
GOP senator tells me that @senatemajldr told WH Friday the 3 key GOP Senators wanted the FBI to interview 4 people: PJ Smyth, Leland Keyser, Mark Judge & Deborah Ramirez. Senator tells me with that limit - FBI could be done by today or Tuesday #Kavanaugh
In a Senate floor speech Monday afternoon, Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) vowed lawmakers will vote this week on Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court. “The goalpost keeps shifting, but the goal hasn’t moved an inch. Not an inch,” said the Kentucky senator. “Let me make it very clear. The time for endless delay and obstruction has come to a close. Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation is out of committee. We’re considering it here on the floor… We’ll be voting on it this week.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Kavanaugh circus well into Twilight Zone territory
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/10/kavanaugh_circus_well_into_twilight_zone_territory.html
Arizona prosecutor Rachel Mitchell has sent a summary report of her assessment of the accusations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. She concludes that the charge would not meet the standard for prosecution, not even success in a civil court proceeding. With 25 years of sex crimes prosecutorial experience, she is qualified to give her opinion.
This will not satisfy the opposition, but it may serve as protection for the wobbly Republican senators Flake, Collins, and Murkowski.
Mitchell has provided nine reasons for doubting the Blasey Ford account:
1. Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.
2. Ford has struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.
3. When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.
4. Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question – details that could help corroborate her account.
5. Dr. Ford's account of the alleged assault has not been corroborated by anyone she identified as having attended – including her lifelong friend.
6. Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of the alleged assault.
7. Dr. Ford has struggled to recall important recent events relating to her allegations, and her testimony regarding recent events raises further questions about her memory.
8. Dr. Ford's description of the psychological impact of the event raises questions.
9. The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford's attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford's account.
Beyond these points are other inconsistencies, recently noted by J.R. Dunn. Dr. Ford is not a licensed psychologist. She was not honest about her reported fear of flying. Further, she described her need for a second front door as initiating the disruption in her marriage that led to the counseling sessions that exposed this allegation of sexual assault against Judge Kavanaugh. However, she made these changes to her house in 2008, four years prior to the therapy sessions. Added together, this information makes Dr. Ford less believable.
Yet polling data show that the public is split on whether the accuser or the judge is more truthful. In a Rasmussen Reports poll released Oct. 1, 39-38% believe Judge Kavanaugh over Dr. Ford. Ten days earlier, the public favored Kavanaugh by 5 points. This does not consider the veracity of her statements, which are not collaborated by the four people she has named.
With scant evidentiary support for the Ford allegations, her lawyer, Debra Katz, has friends seeking any dirt or information regarding the slang used in Kavanaugh's high school yearbook. Andrea Caputo Rose urged people to "use their voice" to prevent Kavanaugh from sitting on the Supreme Court. The curious thing for us is that Rose attended the Stone Ridge School of the Sacred Heart and claims to have socialized with and been a friend of Kavanaugh, who attended Georgetown Prep. Ford attended Holton-Arms High School, which is nearby. You can't make up this story. Rose is also soliciting information that might support Julie Swetnick, who attended Gaithersburg High School and was a college student at the time of her alleged incidents. Rose would also like information that would support Deborah Ramirez's accusations, which Ramirez claims occurred while attended Yale University with Kavanaugh.
The media have been irresponsible and published stories requiring modification. For instance, NBC News had to amend its article implying that Kavanaugh lied when he stated he first heard of the Ramirez claims in the New Yorker article. NBC forgot to mention that he told the Senate investigators he had heard about her claims before the article appeared. The New York Times reported that the judge threw ice at someone while a student at Yale. Yet the byline includes a strongly anti-Kavanaugh activist, Emily Blazelon, a Yale Law School graduate. You can't make this stuff up!
As the allegations by Ramirez appear to melt away, her lawyer, John Clune, has requested that the FBI question up to 20 potential witnesses to verify her claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself at a party while an undergraduate student. So far, no one has come forward. Even in the New Yorker article, there was no collaboration. Again, you could not write this novel.
The most ludicrous story was presented by Julie Swetnick, who claimed that while she was a college student, she witnessed parties in which Kavanaugh and friend Mark Judge ran a gang-raping operation ("train"). In the NBC interview, she had to admit that she never witnessed Kavanaugh spike drinks or rape anyone. But he was there! How can these two men have managed this feat while high school students? Chevy Chase, Md. is a close-knit community. How does this happen without any other person being aware? How did they get so many girls to show up? Why would a college girl go to a high school party? Michael Avenatti, her lawyer (of porn star fame), answered this question by saying she was doing research. Her ex-boyfriend, Richard Vinneccey, challenges her claims and also says she threatened his child.
This time, the Democrats may have picked on the wrong person. Even their supportive press enablers can't find enough serious defects in Brett Kavanaugh's life to ruin him. They claim that his anger at the Thursday hearings must disqualify him, for lack of judicial temperament. Even Senator Flake questioned this anger. Wow, this is the new Democratic talking point on the Senate floor, given by Senator Schumer and others.
Real life is often the basis of many novels. But how could anyone imagine that the man who carried the nuclear codes while serving as President George W. Bush's staff secretary could be such a raging liar, alcoholic, and sexual predator and pass several FBI investigations previously? Only in the Twilight Zone. Are you listening, Senators Flake, Collins, and Murkowski?
“Senator
Dianne Feinstein warned, at the time, they had to solve this crisis now—of
immigrants coming in illegally and getting these jobs.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/05/senator-dianne-feinstein-looking-to-buy.html
WAR PROFITEERS!
SENATOR DIANNE
FEINSTEIN AND PARASITE HUSBAND RICHARD “BRIBSTERS” BLUM
Blum has long
handed out bribes in the form of “campaign contributions” to other corrupt
Democrat politicians so they keep their mouths shut about the staggering
corruption that has profitably followed Feinstein from day one!
*
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan THEAMERICAN THINKER.com
$ERVANT OF RED
CHINA FOR RAW CA$H, $ENATOR FEIN$TEIN’S DRIVER IS A $PY FOR HER CHINE$E PAYMA$TER$!
“All in all, it was an
incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for Red
China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
WAR PROFITEER and
her DADDY WARBUCKS
FEINSTEIN HAS SPENT
HER ENTIRE POLITICAL LIFE STALKING THE HALL OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS THAT
HAVE PUT MILLIONS IN HER HUSBAND, RICHARD BLUM’S BOTTOMLESS POCKETS!
IN
THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional ethics reform.
And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the ethical behavior
of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been beset by her own
ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics experts.
*
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST KAMALA HARRIS:
“Free my heavy breeding Mexicans….. to loot and vote democrat
for more!
WAR ON THE AMERICA
WORKER: FEINSTEIN, PELOSI, OBAMA, and the CLINTON CRIME DUAL
“Senator
Dianne Feinstein warned, at the time, they had to solve this crisis now—of
immigrants coming in illegally and getting these jobs.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/05/senator-dianne-feinstein-looking-to-buy.html
“The Democrats had abandoned their working-class base to chase
what they pretended was a racial group when what they were actually chasing was
the momentum of unlimited migration”. DANIEL GREENFIELD / FRONT PAGE
MAGAZINE
THE CLINTONS AND
RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian charity,
all to obscure its origins."
BURN THE WITCHES AT
THE STAKE and then BOIL THEM IN GREASE!
Where were these
evil women when serial rapist BILL CLINTON, BILL COSBY and CLINTON CRONY,
HARVEY WEINSTEIN were on a roll???
FEINSTEIN, BOXER,
CLINTON, HITLERMALA, PELOSI, WARREN and MAXINE WATERS… faces of staggering
corruption and evil!
Her lawyers and Dianne Feinstein have
abused her horribly and used her as their tool to ruin Kavanaugh. PATRICIA
McCARTHY / AMERICANTHINKER
No comments:
Post a Comment