Tuesday, November 13, 2018

AMERICA'S ROAD TO CIVIL WAR II


Poll: 61 Percent of Democrats Say Republicans Are ‘Racist,’ ‘Bigoted,’ ‘Sexist’



Ds vs Rs
Getty Images /AFP / Darren Hauck / Nicholas Kamm
2:43

A majority of Democrats — 61 percent — describe Republicans as “racist, “bigoted,” and “sexist,” according to a Monday-published poll commissioned by Axios. Thirty-one percent of Republicans describe Democrats the same way.

The online poll surveyed 3,215 U.S. adults, and has a margin of error of three percentage points.
Fifty-four percent of Democrats view Republicans as “ignorant,” with 49 percent of Republicans similarly viewing Democrats.
Fifty percent of Republicans cast Democrats as “evil,” with 44 percent of Democrats doing the same with Republicans.
Minorities of Democrats described Republicans as “fair” (four percent), “thoughtful” (three percent), and “kind” (two percent). Similar fractions of Republicans described Democrats as “fair” (four percent), and “thoughtful.”

Democrats are twice as likely (six percent) as Republicans (three percent) to be “extremely disappointed” if a close family member were to marry a Republican. Axios wrote:
The suspicion runs so deep that a third of all Americans say they’d be disappointed if a close family member married someone whose partisanship didn’t match their own:
  • The percentage saying they’d be at least somewhat bothered by this jumps to 50% among liberal Democrats; it’s 32% among conservative Republicans.
  • For both parties, more moderate affiliates are about 20 percentage points less likely to say they’d be disappointed.
Sixty-three percent of Democrats said President Donald Trump’s political slogan “Make America Great Again” is a message calling for “fewer immigrants” and “less multiculturalism.”
All aforementioned descriptive terms — “racist/bigoted/sexist,” “ignorant,” “spiteful,” “evil,” “fair,” “thoughtful,” and “kind” — were provided to polling subjects via multiple-choice questions.
Forty percent of those polled described themselves as Republicans (31 percent) or leaning Republican (nine percent), with 43 percent describing themselves as Democrats (31 percent) or leaning Democrat (12 percent). Fourteen percent described themselves as “independent.”
Axios’s assessment of its own poll’s results makes no mention of news media outlets such as CNN or the New York Times shaping Democrats’ views of their political detractors as “racist,” “bigoted,” and “sexist.”


THE NEW PRIVILEGED CLASS: Illegals!

This is why you work From Jan - May paying taxes to the government ....with the rest of the calendar year is money for you and your family.

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, with his fake Social Security number, he gets an "earned income credit" of up to $3,200..... free.

He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps.

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.

He requires bilingual teachers and books.

He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI.

Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense.

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.

Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after Paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.




Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people! 



What’s Happening at the Center
In a new report, Andrew Arthur provides an overview of birthright citizenship and the 14th amendment, explaining that an executive order from President Trump could finally force the Supreme Court to settle the issue. He notes the staggering fiscal cost of births to illegal aliens and that many countries have abandoned birthright citizenship in recent decades. No country in Western Europe offers birthright citizenship without exceptions to all children born within their borders.

Dan Cadman analyzes President Trump's options to stem the flow of Central American caravans and human trafficking. These include military deployment, suspending asylum applications, and shutting the border down.



Commentary
Will Today’s New Asylum Rules Do Any Good?
By Mark Krikorian, National Review
New rules funneling asylum seekers to ports of entry may help reduce the asylum backlog and will make the process a bit more orderly, but larger changes to asylum loopholes will require Congress.
Featured Blog Posts

DOJ Again Asks SCOTUS to Take Up DACA
By Andrew Arthur
Now that the Ninth Circuit has finally stopped dragging its feet and issued its decision, the path would appear to be clear for the Supreme Court to hear the case. It is time for the Supreme Court to act on this issue, once and for all.

Scrapping the Per-Country Cap Helps the Companies that Shun U.S. Tech Workers
By Jessica Vaughan
If the per-country cap were to be lifted, then for the next 10 years, nearly all of the green cards in the ordinary professional worker category would go to citizens of India.


Why Not a Domestic Guestworker Program?
By Preston Huennekens The H-2B visa program brings in foreign guestworkers who compete with the most disadvantaged Americans, such as single mothers and ex-felons, for low-skill jobs. Why not replace it with a domestic program?
  Synopsis of the Mass Migration Presidential Proclamation and Asylum Interim Final Rule
By Art Arthur
In essence, the interim final rule bars aliens who enter illegally between the ports of entry from being found eligible for credible fear, although the proclamation does not bar aliens from applying for withholding of removal.
    More Blog Posts
    Video
    The practice of shielding criminal aliens in violation of U.S. law has gone from an isolated practice to one that is widespread in jurisdictions across the country. Dan Cadman highlights the policies, the impacts, and the myths.

    Visit Websit

    No comments: