Mark Levin: ‘No Civil Society Can Survive Open Borders’
Nationally syndicated radio talk
show host, TV host, author and American lawyer Mark Levin (Screenshot)
On his nationally syndicated
radio talk show “The Mark Levin Show” on Thursday night, host
and American lawyer Mark Levin said, “No civil society can survive open
borders.”
“No civil society can survive
open borders,” Mark Levin stated. “None has. None will. We’re a nation-state.
We have borders. Borders are to be respected by foreigners. If foreigners want
to visit our country, they need permission. If they want to come here
permanently, they need permission. If they want to be citizens, they need
permission.”
Levin’s remarks came after
President Donald Trump announced his intention to sign an executive order
ending birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants.
Below is a transcript of Levin’s remarks from his show on Thursday:
“Ladies
and gentlemen, you’re on the right side of history. No civil society can
survive open borders. None has. None will. We’re a nation-state. We have borders.
Borders are to be respected by foreigners. If foreigners want to visit our
country, they need permission. If they want to come here permanently, they need
permission. If they want to be citizens, they need permission.
“That’s
the way it works, except if you want to destroy America from within, if you
don’t believe in the Constitution, if you want rule by judges, if you want to
trash law and order, police, if you want to weaken our military.
“This
is the poison from within that Lincoln talked about, that Joseph Story talked
about, that Jefferson talked about, and so many have talked about. That is, if
this nation is to fall, it will fall from within, much like Rome did, much like
Athens did.
“A
big strong nation, the greatest economy on the face of the earth, the greatest
military on the face of the earth; nobody can defeat us but ourselves.”
MARK LEVIN:
‘Unbridled Immigration, Legal and Illegal, Is
Taking the Country Down’
“Through love of having children we're going to
take over." Augustin Cebada,
Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers of Aztlan
shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los Angeles, 7/4/96
This annual income for an impoverished American family
is $10,000 less than the more than $34,500 in federal funds which are spent on
each unaccompanied minor border crosser.
A study by Tom Wong of the
University of California at San Diego discovered that more than 25 percent of
DACA-enrolled illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That totals
about 200,000 anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled illegal
aliens. This does not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified illegal
aliens. JOHN BINDER
Every Legal is one paycheck and One Hundred
Illegals away from homelessness…. a rape,
murder or molestation!
NANCY PELOSI’S VISION OF AMERICA: 49 MORE
MEXIFORNIAS AND A 50 STATE EXPANDED ANCHOR BABY WELFARE STATE
"Most Californians, who have seen their
taxes increase while public services deteriorate, already know the impact that
mass illegal immigration is having on their communities, but even they may be
shocked when they learn just how much of a drain illegal immigration has
become." FAIR President Dan Stein
But not everything is great for all Californians, with Breitbart
News reporting that
Silicon Valley has the highest
income
inequality
in the nation and the U.S. News &
World Report naming California as the worst
state for “quality of
life,” due to the
high cost of living.
THE
INVASION SPONSORED BY THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
Congressional
Democrats are apparently fine with catch-and-release policies because they see
the likely electoral benefits. According to Customs and Border Protection (CPB),
of the 94,285 Central American family units apprehended last year, 99 percent
of them remain in the country today. CPB also reports that 98 percent of the
31,754 unaccompanied minors from the Northern Triangle of Central America
remain in the country. CAL THOMAS
Democrats care about illegal aliens, not you
A buddy shared a heart-wrenching story with me during dinner. His mom was killed Christmas Eve by a drunk-driving illegal alien. The illegal had been caught four times driving drunk by police, never deported. My buddy is number nine of his amazing mom's thirteen kids. She was old-school Italian, waking up 3 A.M. five days a week to bake fresh bread and prepare meals for their family. Dad cooked on weekends.
Christmas Eve 2002, she decided to make a quick run to the store for a few ingredients she needed to bake pies. You can imagine the devastating horror their family felt upon being notified by police that their mother had been killed.
The illegal alien drunk driver received seven years and served only three and a half. Two of my buddy's brothers attended the illegal alien's parole hearing to keep him behind bars, to no avail. The multiple-offender illegal alien drunk driver was set free to roam the streets of America, not deported.
As I watched my buddy struggle to maintain his composure, my heart went out to him. I thought, "Why are all of mainstream media's and Democrats' compassion and sympathy always given to illegals and nothing for Americans?"
While strolling with her dad on a San Francisco pier, 32-year-old Kate Steinle was shot and killed by an illegal alien. Kate's killer had a long criminal record. The sanctuary city repeatedly welcomed back the illegal, deported five times and a seven times convicted felon, with open arms. A liberal San Francisco jury found Kate's killer not guilty. President Trump said their verdict was disgraceful. Kate's dad recalls her last words as he held her in his arms: "help me, Dad."
San Francisco politicians, mainstream media, and Democrats celebrated the leftist jury's outrageous not guilty verdict. These leftists did not express an ounce of sympathy for American citizen Kate Steinle and her family.
Sixteen-year-old Kayla Cuevas was brutally murdered by MS-13 gang members who illegally invade our country. Did Democrat Nancy Pelosi express an ounce of sympathy for Kayla's mom, Evelyn Rodriguez? No. Pelosi angrily attackedTrump for calling MS-13 gang members animals. No compassion or sympathy for Americans.
Folks, I could fill this article with incidences in which American lives have been devastated by illegal repeat criminals and illegal gangs coddled by Democrats who run sanctuary cities.
Democrat California governor Jerry Brown actually signed a bill making California a "sanctuary state." Brown's bill says his state will not cooperate with federal immigration law enforcement, putting American lives at risk. Why is Brown gifting illegals rights while denying the rights of his American constituents? While Californians struggle to find housing, Brown is assisting illegals with housing. Illegals in California receive college tuition and numerous other benefits unavailable to legal citizens.
So why are mainstream media and Democrats obsessed with opening our borders for the free flow of illegals and getting them addicted to government freebies? One reason is that we have allowed old hippies to indoctrinate our kids in public schools for decades. This has created a generation that believes that America is the greatest source of evil in the world, founded by white straight Christian men who stole everything from the rest of the world. Our youths believe that it is morally unjust for America to have borders. We must share what we stole.
Insidiously, the second reason why Democrats desire to flood the country with illegals is to gain political power. Immigrants have contributed greatly to our culture. The vast majority of illegals are unskilled workers easily seduced by Democrat politicians who promise to take care of them. Democrats will do to illegals what they have done to blacks for decades: give them just enough to keep them poor, on welfare, and faithfully voting for Democrats.
This is why mainstream media and Democrats pretend to have all the compassion and sympathy in the world for illegals while ignoring the dire consequence coddling illegals has on the lives of Americans.
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Help Lloyd spread the Truth: http://bit.ly/2kZqmUk
http://LloydMarcus.com
Help Lloyd spread the Truth: http://bit.ly/2kZqmUk
http://LloydMarcus.com
WEST HOLLYWOOD WELCOME MAT FOR ILLEGALS… Not a single employer of illegals ever prosecuted in this LA RAZA SANCTUARY CITY where they print voting ballots in Spanish so illegals can vote for more!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/does-reformation-hardware-in-west.html
Sessions, the left, and hypocrisy
In the end, Trump had them marching for a man they hate.
The scuttlebutt currently in Washington, D.C., is that Robert Mueller is drafting his final report, wrapping up his nearly two-year-long probe. There’s no timetable for its release, but, presumably, once it’s out, we’ll find out how suburban soccer moms in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, were tricked into voting Trump by hypnotic Facebook ads planted by shtetl-dwelling trolls.
Before all that, Mueller has to survive a change of leadership. Just after the midterm elections when Democrats took back the House of Representatives, President Trump insisted on and received the resignation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The move, which came in the President’s patented news-dropping form of a tweet, was hardly surprising. Congressional Republicans hinted that Trump would force Sessions out following the elections. What was unexpected was Democrats’ reaction to the firing of the nation’s top lawman.
Just hours after his dismissal, liberals, fearing that the Mueller probe was now in danger, marched on Union Square in New York City to voice their disagreement with Sessions’ firing. The protesters’ sign bore the cant synonymous with liberal sloganeering: “Hands off Mueller,” “Repeal, Replace Trump,” “This is what democracy looks like.”
The next day, protests took placenationwide in deep-blue metropolises like Seattle and Boston. Many were organized by MoveOn.org, the liberal advocacy site founded to protect Bill Clinton after he lied under oath. Integrity under the law, it would seem, is only a Republican matter.
The rallies were a sight to behold: thousands of middle-to-upper-class white liberals gathered in de facto support of Sessions, a man whom they spent the better part of two years impugning.
Congressional Democrats weren’t immune to cognitive dissonance. Likely speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi called Sessions’ ousting a “blatant attempt” of Trump’s to undermine Mueller. Just last year, Pelosi designated Sessions “not fit to serve as the top law enforcement officer of our country and must resign.”
Presumed 2020 presidential candidate and Native American impersonator Elizabeth Warren criticized Sessions’ firing despite also once demanding his resignation. “Sessions cannot continue to serve. He should resign,” she tweeted last year. Now she’s treating Trump’s granting of her wish like a smallpox blanket.
If elected Democrats or their picketing toadies had any semblance of principle, they’d be cheering Sessions departure. The long-time Alabama senator was brutal on issues close to liberals’ hearts: unapologetically prosecuting illegal drug use; vigorously enforced immigration law; increasing deportations; separating and interning families illegally crossing the southern border; ending an Obama-era proscription on selling military weaponry to local police; putting financial pressure on so-dubbed sanctuary cities where localized law enforcement refuses to cooperate with federal immigration officials.
Sessions was a stickler for the rule of law. His philosophy was simple and inelegant: What’s written is enforced -- no exceptions, no loopholes, no penumbras. Ann Coulter has argued quite convincingly that Sessions was “the one member of Trump’s Cabinet making good on his campaign’s immigration promises.”
We don’t yet know how Sessions’ acting replacement, Matthew Whitaker, will be as the nation’s number-one law enforcer. Will he act on his previous criticism of the Mueller probe and protect the President from the special counsel’s overreach? Will he be a hardliner on law enforcement, or take a more arbitrary approach? Will his recess appointment even stand up to a constitutional challenge?
None of these questions matter to liberals, who have dropped years’ worth of grievances to find yet another reason to whinge about Trump. Theirs was never a principled objection. It was just another means to weaken a president they didn’t elect in order to secure power for themselves.
Our current politics increasingly and regrettably resembles powermongering over honest disagreement on the common good. The crocodile tears over Sessions’ firing are just another example of liberals stomping on sincerity to score political points.
“The most significant lesson of the Trump era in American politics is that no one actually cares about so-called ‘norms’ or ethics or hoary phrases like ‘separation of powers,’ observes Matthew Walther. Democrats have adopted this nihilism without a hint of self-awareness. This doesn’t bode well for the country should they take back even more control of the federal governmental apparatus.
No comments:
Post a Comment