Europe falls to the Muslims as
America did to the invading Mexicans!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/visit-austria-before-it-becomes-allahs.html
MUSLIMS ARE DOING TO EUROPE WHAT MEXICANS HAVE DONE
TO AMERICA....JUMP THE BORDERS, BREED ANCHOR BABIES FOR
WELFARE...
VOTE FOR MORE.
Jihad: Islam's Engine
Right from the start, violent jihad served as the engine of Islam under the command and supervision of Muhammad himself. To understand how quickly Islam spread around the world, we must see the timeline of Islam.
After Muhammad's death in 632 A.D., his friend Abu Bakr was named caliph and ruler of the Islamic community, or Ummah. Muhammad's followers in a short time occupied a vast geographic area; conversion to Islam was heightened by Islamic missionaries, who intermingled with local populations to promulgate the Islamic teachings. It resulted in Islam's spread outward from Mecca toward both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the creation of the Muslim world.
In no time at all, Islam spread like a pandemic. Once it attacked the mind of its victims, this debilitating disease was capable of transforming them into helpless pawns that had no choice but to execute what they were directed to do.
Here is the truth, as bitter as it may be. Islam is the culprit. Islam is anything but a religion of peace. Violence is at the core of Islam. Violence is institutionalized in the Muslim's holy book, the Qur'an, in many verses:
Qur'an: 9:5: "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."
Qur'an: 9:112: "The Believers fight in Allah's cause; they slay and are slain, kill and are killed."
Qur'an: 8:39: "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world)."
Qur'an: 8:65: "O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding."
Qur'an: 9:38: "Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to go forth and fight in Allah's Cause you cling to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you go forth, He will afflict and punish you with a painful doom, and put others in your place."
That's what the Qur'an commands the believer repeatedly – to make jihad on even the people of the book, Jews and Christians. Islam essentially invented the idea that Christians, Jews, and pagans are an abomination and offensive to Allah and that their very existence represents an attack upon the self-defined Islamic right to reign over the world. Allah thus enlists Muslim believers to eradicate by force those who offend him and, by disbelieving, prevent his rule. True Muslim believers therefore become the enforcers, hit men and mercenaries for their god, in order to establish a global caliphate for their parasitic clergy. Their targets are artificially constructed adversaries.
Muslim believers hence are instructed to fear the "great Satan" and are told that if they do not live up to Allah's calls to jihad, they themselves are offensive to Allah and to their families.
Now, the only question that remains is the extent of a Muslim's obedience to the Qur'an and the Sunna, the life examples of Muhammad. To be sure, a great many Muslims are not following the dictates of the Qur'an verbatim, as they should, since they consider it to be the literal immutable perfect words of Allah.
Furthermore, nowhere do I say all Muslims believe in shedding the blood of others. Yet the commandments of the Qur'an to believers are clear and emphatic. It is for this reason that an innumerable number of Muslims do engage in jihad and suicide volunteers vie with one another to offer their services to their handler leaders.
A true Muslim does not and cannot believe in freedom of choice. In the religion of Islam – Submission – everything is up to Allah, as clearly and repeatedly stipulated in the Qur'an. The raison d'ĂȘtre for the Muslim is to be unconditionally submissive to the will and dictates of Allah. Everything a "good" Muslim does is contingent upon the will and decree of Allah, he is indoctrinated to believe.
To cut to the chase, we need to eliminate some disinformation and myths about the "war on terror." We are not fighting terrorism. We are engaging in an ideological battle between freedom, conservatism, democracy, individual rights, capitalism, and "Christian" ethics and Islamofascism, communism-socialism, theocracy, and tyranny.
There are also internationalist, dictatorial, globalist forces that seek to use the conflict to create an international government and the unification of all religions by the destruction of nationalism, patriotism, individual rights, and sectarianism.
It is not "fanatical," "radical," or "extreme" Islam that we are fighting, but normal, orthodox, canonical, typical, accepted, traditional Islam, straight from the mouth of Muhammad. Islam is violent in direct proportion to its mission and scripture. The so-called fanatics and terrorists are only upholding the truth of their principles.
In short: We must begin to declare Islam evil, not from a sectarian perspective, but from a universal, humanist one. Every encroachment of Islam as a religion must be rejected and discouraged by all people everywhere. Any leftist who attempts to give aid and comfort to this religion of hate must be denounced and frustrated at every turn. Otherwise, get used to your radioactive suit and your fallout shelter, a standard of living – and a level of freedom – one tenth of what you have today.
The Islamist Terrorist as
Psychopath
There are basic interrelated questions
that any student of human history must ask. Why is human history filled with so
much evil, and why do good people so often do nothing in the face of evil?
Jamie Glazov’s new book, Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing,
and Devouring Us, addresses that troubling question.
The answer that he comes up with in Jihadist
Psychopath is a collusion that is not born only of simple radicalism,
but of the ways in which Islamic political movements play on our own emotional
weaknesses.
Jihadist Psychopath is a journey into the dark heart of
the Western world using the metaphor of the interplay between the psychopath
and his victims. That metaphor pervades Glazov’s text, structuring his understanding
of the growing terror death toll and the accompanying sympathy for the
terrorists.
Glazov, who has a BA in Political Science
and a PhD in History, had already made a study of Islamic terrorists. To
prepare for the writing of Jihadist Psychopath, he also made a
study of the most fascinating and deadliest element in the criminal life of
societies: the psychopath. Human societies are bound together by empathy.
Multiculturalism and diversity stretch and expand our sense of empathy to its
limits. The psychopath plays on our sense of empathy despite lacking any
empathy of his or her own.
The uses and abuses of empathy by the
psychopath and the Islamic terrorist are a major focus of Jihadist
Psychopath. Islamic terrorists take advantage of the empathy bonds that
multicultural societies use to bind diverse populations together into a single
functional entity whose members cooperate and even sacrifice for the benefit of
the group, without ever sharing in that sense of mutual responsibility.
Like psychopaths, Glazov argues, Islamic
terrorists create the illusion of a mutual relationship while viciously
exploiting and eventually destroying their victims by degrees. These victims
can be the individuals, the women who marry Islamic terrorists only to be used
by them to obtain legal status or to birth new Jihadists, but they are the
microcosm of our larger society which is also being charmed, seduced, and
destroyed by an ideology that turns our own values and our sense of self against
us.
“Once he succeeds in lodging his hooks
into his target’s body, he inflicts the key wound, convincing him that he (the
victim) is the actual offender and guilty party, and that the psychopath is the
actual victim,” Glazov writes.
The exchange of roles between perpetrator
and victim is crucial to the predation of weaker societies on stronger
societies. As predatory plants mimic the appearance of the prey of their
victims, the Jihadist appears to resemble a victim of Western civilization, of
colonialism, capitalism, and imperialism, turning guilt and grief into the
aphrodisiac of his monstrous appetite, before entrapping his civilizational
victim.
Victimhood is the protective coloration of
the psychopathic predator, both in his familiar role as the demon haunting a
thousand crime stories, thrillers, and action movies, and the less familiar
guise of CAIR, ISNA, and countless other Muslim Brotherhood front groups who
defend the predation of terrorists by reinventing them as the victims of the
very people whom they are killing and destroying.
And yes, the victims are neither truly
helpless nor innocent. As the con artist exploits greed, the psychopath’s
swollen sense of self-regard feeds upon the narcissism of his victims.
As Glazov notes in Jihadist Psychopath,
“It is crucial to emphasize that many victims in the con game possess a
tremendous narcissism, since in needing to believe that they are part of the
script and can actually change it, they incubate a pathological and
self-destructive ego.”
The boundless narcissism of the Left,
which convinces its true believers that their beverage choices and their menu
options can save or destroy the planet, that even their pettiest actions and
emotional states are deeply meaningful signifiers of great and terrible changes
in the world, makes it absurdly easy for the Islamist psychopath, who offers
the illusion of saving them and himself, to hook them on his line.
The Left hungers for victims to justify
its inflated sense of self-importance and its greed for power. Islamists
exploit their messianic delusions by playing the victims in need of rescuing.
The Islamist psychopath validates the twisted psychology of his radical victims
only to destroy his rescuers.
This same psychodrama has played out in
Iran, in Egypt, in the United Kingdom, and the United States. When the
alliances unravel, as they finally must, the socialist utopia instead becomes
the caliphate.
Jihadist Psychopath is an invaluable resource for
understanding and coming to grips with the human drama behind the headlines and
the radical emotions behind the radical march of political events. It gets at
the unacknowledged truth behind the political psychodramas of the Left, the
narcissistic notion that even the most destructive behaviors can feel good because
they make us feel good about who we are.
“Who we are” was the theme of a
number of Obama speeches. It is no coincidence that the politician who most
definitively straddled the cultural divide between Islam and the Left, while
uniting them politically in their mutual hatred of the United States of
America, could never get enough of telling us who we are.
The core of Jihadist Psychopath lies
in the conflict of identities, the slow sonorous clash of civilizations between
a West that is losing its sense of self and an East that is regaining it, and
between former conquerors losing their religion and renewed conquerors
regaining it, between monsters and victims.
“Islamic supremacism crushes all
individuality within itself. Its members cannot have their own identity or
beliefs, nor can they explore or nurture their own happiness or talents,” Jamie
Glazov writes.
And those same Islamic supremacists use
their conviction in the inferiority of the individual to destroy the identities
of their victims, temporarily adopting their borrowed identities as camouflage,
mirroring their victims, gaining their confidence, abusing them, destroying
their sense of self, and killing them.
Jihadist Psychopath is a compelling look at the process
by which the West is losing its life and its soul.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism
Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer
focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Muslim Brotherhood, Islamists Have ‘Infiltrated’ Swedish
Political Parties Since 1980s, Claims Academic
30 Nov 2018119
3:54
Academic Sameh Egyptson has claimed that the Muslim Brotherhood and
other Islamist groups have been systematically infiltrating Sweden’s political
system since the 1980s.
Penning an
opinion piece for Swedish newspaper Expressen, Mr Egyptson, a
researcher in interreligous relationships at Lund University, believes that the Egypt-founded
Muslim Brotherhood is attempting to bring forward an Islamic agenda in the West
by using democratic systems, in Sweden specifically through the Islamic League
in Sweden (IFiS) and Sweden’s Muslim Council (SMR).
CLOSE | X
Sweden Election:
Prosecutor Considers Alleged Votes For Building Permits Mosque https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/14/swedish-prosecutor-considers-investigating-mosque-offered-votes-building-permits/ …
Sweden Election:
Prosecutor Considers Alleged Votes For Building Permits Mosque
“In my studies and research
documents, I found that Islamists already negotiated with political parties in
the 1980s about voting in elections. A report in Arabic
written by Sweden’s Muslim Council (SMR) 2001 described a historical chapter
that not many people know about,” he wrote, quoting the document as saying:
SMR collaborates with IFiS to
establish an Islamic political group to co-operate and coordinate with the
Swedish parties to educate political cadres. These cadres will mingle with the
parties and fight for the Muslim minority’s rights through these parties.
Mr Egyptson, who was born into a
Coptic Christian family in Egypt, adds: “For us who come from the Middle East
this is not a surprise. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood managed to
infiltrate two of the three parties that are the inheritors of [former Egyptian
President Gamal Abdel] Nasser’s Arab Social Union, both the Liberals and Social
Democrats.”
Sweden Election: Social Democrat Candidate
Claims Islamic Law More Important than Swedish Law https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/08/sweden-social-democrat-candidate-claims-islamic-law-more-important-than-swedish-law/ …
Sweden: Social
Democrat Candidate Says Islamic Law Trumps Swedish Law
In
an interview with Dagen on
Wednesday, Mr Egyptson said that
Islamism had begun to influence the country’s political agenda, noting that
“there are special laws for Muslims, Muslim schools, gender separation, and
more.”
He then claimed to have been in
contact with members of the Muslim Brotherhood who told him how they had
influenced politics in Sweden through “our brother in the defence committee” —
referencing a “moderate” member of the Rikstag.
“They could say this to me because
they thought I was a Muslim,” he explained.
One
of the examples the academic gives of “political Islam” placing candidates
into Swedish politics is of the former minister for housing and urban
development, Green Party member Mehmet Kaplan, who resigned from the government’s
cabinet in 2016 after photographs of him dining with members of Turkish ultranationalists,
including the neo-fascist Grey Wolves, exposed his links to extremism.
Another
is Omar Mustafa, the former chairman of the IFiS, who was elected to the
left-wing Social Democrats’ party board but was forced to resign seven
days later in April 2013 after disclosure of his alleged relationship to the
Muslim Brotherhood, as well as for inviting known anti-Semites to a conference
and for his views on women and gay people.
Swedish Left-Wing
Party Takes Action over ‘Islamised’ Youth Winghttps://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/01/sweden-social-democrats-islamised-youth/ …
Swedish Social
Democrats Take Action over ‘Islamised’ Youth Wing
Asked
by Dagen how it
was possible for the MB to have “infiltrated” Swedish politics, when the
fundamentalist Islamic group claims not to have contacts in Sweden, the author,
who recently published the book Holy
White Lies: Muslim Brotherhood in the West – Case Sweden, said, “It’s
white lies,” explaining how he discovered in 1999 that Muslim representatives in Egypt claiming
to engage in ‘religious dialogue’ spoke differently to Western visitors than
they did to the Christian Egyptians.
“There was no religious dialogue, it
was white lies,” said Mr Egyptson said.
The author and academic warned
Swedish parties to “investigate the infiltration of Islamists and return to
their ideological values. For each new disclosure, the parties lose
confidence. Among the losers we find, in particular, the Muslim voters who
do not agree with the Islamists.”
In
September. Breitbart London reported that a candidate for
the Social Democrats was removed from the national list ahead of Sweden’s
federal elections for saying that Islamic law was more important than Swedish
law.
The
Social Democrats had also been warned to take action over its
“Islamised” youth wing after it emerged that members from its migrant-populated
no-go zones expressed views on LGBT matters that conflicted with the party’s
progressive position.
‘Justice
Democrat’ Ilhan Omar Argued Against Bill on Female Genital Mutilation
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/21/justice-democrat-ilhan-omar-opposed-law-to-ban-female-genital-mutilation/
21 Nov 20186,825
2:40
Ilhan Omar, the newly-elected U.S. representative from Minnesota’s 5th
congressional district, and a member of the left-wing “Justice Democrats,”
argued against a 2017 bill in her state that increased penalties for female
genital mutilation.
Omar is being celebrated as one of the first two Muslim women
elected to Congress, and a member of a new cohort of young, “progressive” and
“diverse” representatives who purportedly represent the future of the
Democratic Party.
welcome to the future of the democratic
party
Yet Omar’s stance on female
genital mutilation (FGM) is anything but “progressive.”
In
2017, she questioned a bill in the Minnesota State House against the
practice, making it “a felony for parents to subject their daughters to the
procedure and calls for loss of custody and prison terms from five to 20 years,
depending on the extent of the injuries,” as well as “increas[ing] penalties
for those who perform the procedure,” the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported.
While
she agreed that the practice was “heinous,” and ultimately voted for the bill — contrary to
at least one report — Omar claimed that FGM
should not be singled out by a new law, and that parents should be charged
under existing laws. She was quoted in local news as
arguing: “I don’t want us to create laws because we want to get into the media
and because we want a flashy headline.” She also reportedly opposed removing
victims from their parents’ custody, according to Alpha News.
The
issue came to the fore Tuesday after a federal judge in Michigan tossed out federal criminal
charges against a group of Muslim defendants who had carried out FGM on young
girls, ruling the federal ban unconstitutional. The state laws against the
practice are valid, but the federal law overstepped constitutional boundaries,
the judge ruled.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He is
a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the
co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of
a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
Update: While she argued against the bill, Omar ultimately voted
for it. The article has been updated to reflect that fact.
MUSLIMS ARE THE GODLESS
CULT OF MURDER, RAPE AND HATE
November 21, 2018
When Muslims Rape European
White Women, Whose Fault Is It?
European
women are to blame for being raped by Muslim men. Such is the latest
position – the latest apologia – being offered by those dedicated to
exonerating undesirable Muslim behavior, particularly in the context of
accepting more Muslim migrants into the West.
On
October 14, seven Muslim migrants raped a
teenage German girl in a park, after drugging her at a disco in
Freiburg. (At least she survived; in a similar case that occurred a
week earlier in Italy, the drugged rape victim was left
murdered.) Bernhard Rotzinger, the police chief of
Freiburg, responded bysaying,
"We cannot offer citizens an all-risk insurance [against crime], but I can
advise this: Don't make yourself vulnerable by using alcohol or drugs."
Similarly,
after mobs of Muslim migrants sexually assaulted as many as one
thousand women on New Year's Eve 2016 in Cologne, Germany, the
city's mayor, Henriette Reker, called on
the women, the victims – not their male rapists – to make changes: "The
women and young girls have to be more protected in the future so these things
don't happen again. This means they should go out and have fun, but
they need to be better prepared, especially with the Cologne carnival coming
up. For this, we will publish online guidelines that these young
women can read through to prepare themselves."
Such
advice against alcohol, drugs, and reckless behavior would be more respectable
had it not been made under duress. As it is, it is a
cop-out. Or, as a November 8 report discussing
the aforementioned rape in Freiburg puts it, "[t]he focus on prevention is
a good thing, but also shows how German authorities and media barely hold the
migrant crisis responsible for the disaster that is unfolding in
Germany. Political correctness has caused officials to put the blame
for the criminal acts on the women instead of Merkel's guests."
These
are hardly the first times officials "put the blame for the criminal acts
[of Muslim men] on the women." Nor is this phenomenon limited
to Germany. For instance, after a 20-year-old Austrian woman waiting
at a bus stop in Vienna was attacked,
beaten, and robbed by four Muslim men – including one who
"started [by] putting his hands through my hair and made it clear that in
his cultural background there were hardly any blonde women" – police
responded by telling the victim to dye her hair:
At
first I was scared, but now I'm more angry than anything. After the
attack they told me that women shouldn't be alone on the streets
after 8pm. And they also gave me other advice, telling me I
should dye my hair dark and also not dress in such a provocative
way. Indirectly that means I was partly to blame for what happened
to me. That is a massive insult.
Likewise,
Unni Wikan, a female professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo
in Norway, insists that
"'Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these
rapes,' because Muslim men found their manner of dress
provocative. The professor's conclusion was not that Muslim men
living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite:
'Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt
themselves to it.'"
So
much for the feminist claim that women are free to dress and behave as
promiscuously and provocatively as they want – and woe to any man who dares
cite this as justifying his sexual aggression. Apparently, this
feminist refrain does not apply to Muslim men.
But
perhaps the greater irony of all these excuses is that, from the very start of
Islam 14 centuries ago, European women – even chaste nuns – have always been
portrayed by Muslims as sexually promiscuous by nature.
This
is easily discerned by examining medieval Muslim perceptions – and subsequent treatment
– of European women, as documented throughout Sword
and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (see
American Thinker review here). Consider
Muslim views concerning neighboring Byzantine women, who came to represent all
European or Christian women to Islam.
As
one Western academic of Muslim origin (rather euphemistically) explains:
The
Byzantines as a people were considered fine examples of physical beauty, and
youthful slaves and slave-girls of Byzantine origins were highly valued. ...
The Arabs' appreciation of the Byzantine female has a long history
indeed. For the Islamic period, the earliest literary evidence we
have is a hadith (saying of the Prophet). Muhammad is said to have
addressed a newly converted Arab: "Would you like the girls of Banu
al-Asfar [the yellow (haired?) or pale people]?"
Muhammad's
question was meant to entice the man to join the Tabuk campaign against the
Romans and reap its rewards – in this case, the sexual enslavement of
attractive women. In other words, as "white-complexioned blondes, with
straight hair and blue eyes," to quote another academic, Byzantine women
were not so much "appreciated" or "highly valued" as they
were lusted after. (All quotes in this article are sourced from and
documented in Sword and Scimitar.)
Any
sense of compliment ends there. Muslims habitually portrayed
Europe's Christian women, as contemptible and corrupt infidels, beginning with
those they first encountered in neighboring Byzantium, as sexually promiscuous
by nature – perhaps simply to support the fantasy that they were eager to be
sexually enslaved. Thus, for Abu Uthman al-Jahiz (b. 776), a
prolific court scholar, the females of Constantinople were the "most
shameless women in the whole world"; "they find sex more
enjoyable" and "are prone to adultery." Abd al-Jabbar
(b. 935), another prominent scholar, claimed that "adultery is commonplace
in the cities and markets of Byzantium" – so much so that even "the
nuns from the convents went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to
monks."
For
all these reasons and more, European women, typified by neighboring Eastern
Roman women, became Islam's "beautiful femme fatale who makes men lose
their self-control," as Nadia Maria el-Cheikh, author of Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs,
explains:
Our
[Arab-Muslim] sources show not Byzantine women but writers' images of these
women, who served as symbols of the eternal female – constantly a potential
threat, particularly due to blatant exaggerations of their sexual
promiscuity. In our texts, Byzantine women are strongly associated
with sexual immorality[.] ... While the one quality that our [Muslim] sources
never deny is the beauty of Byzantine women, the image that they create in
describing these women is anything but beautiful. Their depictions are,
occasionally, excessive, virtually caricatures, overwhelmingly negative.
Such
fevered fantasies – which "are clearly far from Byzantine reality" –
existed only in the minds of Muslim men and "must be recognized for what
they are: attempts to denigrate and defame a rival culture. ... In fact, in
Byzantium, women were expected to be retiring, shy, modest, and devoted to
their families and religious observances. ... The behavior of most women in
Byzantium was a far cry from the depictions that appear in Arabic
sources."
Clearly,
little has changed some 1,400 years after the founding of Islam: European women
continue to be seen as naturally promiscuous and thus provoking Muslim men into
raping them.
Thus,
in the United Kingdom, a Muslim man explained to a British woman why he was
raping her: "you
white women are good at it." Another Muslim man
called a 13-year-old virgin "a
little white slag" – British slang for "loose, promiscuous
woman" – before raping her.
In
Germany, a group of Muslim "refugees" stalked a 25-year-old woman,
hurled "filthy" insults at her, and taunted her for
sex. They too explained their logic to her – "German
girls are just there for sex" – before reaching into her blouse
and groping her. A Muslim man who almost killed his 25-year-old
German victim while raping her – and shouting "Allah!" – asked
afterward if
she enjoyed it.
In
Austria, an "Arabic-looking man" approached a 27-year-old woman at a
bus stop, pulled
down his pants, and "all he could say was sex, sex, sex,"
prompting the woman to scream and flee.
In
Australia, a Muslim cabbie groped and insulted his female passengers, including
by saying, "All
Australian women are sluts and deserve to be raped."
In
short, the ancient Islamic motif concerning the alleged promiscuity of European
women is alive and well – irrespective of the latter's behavior – and continues
justifying the Muslim rape of Western women.
Yet,
even in this, Islam can turn to those "progressive," godless elements
that dominate Western society for cover. For, just as "the
Left" has worked long and hard to portray Islamic intolerance, violence,
and terrorism as the West's fault – because of the crusades, because of
colonialism, because of cartoons, because of Israel, because of freedom of
speech – it now adds "because of Western promiscuity" to the list of
reasons that "provoke" Muslims to behave like Muslims.
(For many more examples of Muslims sexually objectifying Western
women throughout history, see the author's new book, Sword
and Scimitar.)
Reports: Saudi
Authorities Tortured and Sexually Abused Human Rights Activists
21 Nov 2018203
4:12
Human rights organizations including Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch accused authorities in Saudi Arabia on
Tuesday of torturing and sexually abusing some of the country’s most
high-profile dissidents and human rights activists.
According to detailed testimony published
by Amnesty International, “activists were repeatedly tortured by electrocution
and flogging, leaving some unable to walk or stand properly,” leading to one of
the victims repeatedly trying to take her own life:
In one reported instance, one of the
activists was made to hang from the ceiling, and according to another testimony,
one of the detained women was reportedly subjected to sexual harassment, by
interrogators wearing face masks.
According to the testimonies
obtained, the human rights defenders were unable to walk or stand properly, had
uncontrolled shaking of the hands, and marks on the body. One of the activists
reportedly attempted to take her own life repeatedly inside the prison. Prison
authorities in Dhahban Prison have also reportedly warned detained activists
against disclosing any accounts of torture or prison procedures to family
members.
This testimony was also corroborated by “informed sources” who spoke with Human Rights Watch,
who reported on similar cases of torture and sexual abuse:
The reports allege that torture by
Saudi authorities included administering electric shocks, whipping the women on
their thighs, and forcible hugging and kissing, Human Rights Watch said today.
The sources were concerned that they and the activists would suffer reprisals
if the women were identified publicly.
The sources say that masked Saudi
interrogators tortured the women during the initial stages of interrogation,
but it was unclear whether they were seeking to force the women to sign
confessions or merely to punish them for their peaceful advocacy. Following the
interrogations, sources said, the women showed physical signs of torture,
including difficulty walking, uncontrolled shaking of the hands, and red marks
and scratches on their faces and necks. At least one of the women attempted to
commit suicide multiple times, the sources said.
The Saudi government has held the
activists in the Dhahban prison on the western Red Sea coast since May,
following a crackdown on
women’s rights campaigners charged with trying to “destabilize” the
Kingdom and supposed links with “suspicious” entities working outside the
country.
The women were principally
campaigning for the establishment of equal women’s rights in the face of Crown
Prince Mohammed Bin Salman’s reforms to various aspects of Saudi’s religious
law, which include allowing women
to drive cars.
On Wednesday, the Saudi government
strongly denied all
allegations of torture, claiming the activists were subject to the “standard
judiciary process.”
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s
judiciary system does not condone, promote, or allow the use of torture.
Anyone, whether male or female, being investigated is going through the
standard judiciary process led by the public prosecution while being held for
questioning, which does not in any way rely on torture either physical, sexual,
or psychological,” a Saudi official said.
The Islamic kingdom has come under
growing international condemnation in recent weeks following the murder of
Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the country’s embassy in Istanbul last month. Principal
suspects in the case include members of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman’s inner circle, although he has denied any connection to the killing.
On Tuesday, President Donald
Trump confirmed that
the U.S. would not pursue the allegations against the country involving
Khashoggi further for fear of jeopardizing business and security relationship,
despite growing criticism of the country’s appalling human rights record.
“It’s a very simple equation for me.
I’m about making America great again and I’m about America first,” Trump said
in his statement. “We may never know all of the facts surrounding the murder of
Mr. Jamal Khashoggi. In any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. They have been a great ally in our very important fight against Iran.”
“QURAN SAYS KILL PEOPLE LIKE YOU. WE WILL KILL
YOU.”
Not much attention is
paid to the rising Islamic influence in Scotland. Aside from the Glasgow
Airport attack, there hasn't been much in the way of terrorism. And so it's
flown under the radar.
The likes of Osama Saeed and Hamza Yousaf are the
SNP's new defenders of Scottish values. Osama Saeed was also a Scottish
National Party candidate and an adviser to Prime Minister Salmond.
Osama Saeed, named one of Scotland's Top 100 thinkers and
opinion formers, wrote an article for The Guardian championing the
return of the Caliphate. "A restored caliphate," Osama explained,
"is entirely compatible with democratically accountable
institutions." It would be just like the EU, except its leader would be
called a Caliph, its law would be Sharia and if the US and Britain are really
sincere about helping Muslims, they should support the restoration of the
Caliphate.
In an astoundingly short time, the Scottish National Party has
gone from collaborating with Nazis, to collaborating with Islamists. Its talk
of Scottish values has become a farce. SNP candidate Humza Yousaf took his oath
of allegiance in the Scottish Parliament in Urdu. Jahangir Hanif became
known as the Kalashnikov Councilor over a video of him firing an
AK-47 in an armed camp in Pakistan. And the SNP has funneled hundreds of
thousands of pounds to the Scottish Islamic Foundation
Paigham Mustafa and his family have been offered protection
by police after several fundamentalists branded him a
"Kafir", which means disbeliever, and issued death threats.
Mustafa claims to be living under a fatwa issued in 2001 by 15
imams in Glasgow after he published a series of articles questioning
mosque teachings. The married father of three later published his book The
Quran: God's Message to Mankind, his interpretation of the central religious
text of Islam.
Last week, a letter written by Mustafa questioning the practice
of fasting during Ramadan was published and subsequently posted on Facebook.
In a series of threatening messages under the post, one critic
said: “Shut up or else you will get your head chopped off … shut up or else you
will be beheaded … shut up you Kafir dog … you will get beheaded … we will kill
you kafir.”
A separate message sent privately by another critic said: “Quran
says kill people like you. You deserve to be killed. We will kill you.”
Another post by a third critic warned: “Don’t talk about Islam
you Kafir. Remove this post Kafir. Or else you will get killed like Rashad
Khalifa.”
Mustafa fears he will be targeted by fundamentalists in the UK
and compared himself to Asad Shah, who was stabbed to death in a
religiously-motivated murder in Glasgow in 2016. Shah’s killer, Tanveer Ahmed,
said Shah had “disrespected the messenger of Islam, the Prophet Muhammad”.
No place is safe. No
place is immune. Not when the doors to migration are open.
JOHN BOLTON PRAISES JAMIE GLAZOV'S NEW BOOK, “JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH”
President Trump's National Security Adviser gives a glowing thumbs up.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/271214/john-bolton-praises-jamie-glazovs-new-book-frontpage-editors
September 3, 2018
We are excited to announce that Frontpage Editor Jamie Glazov's new book, Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us, has received glowing advance praise from President Trump's National Security Adviser, John Bolton. (Jamie discusses this great honor HERE).
Jihadist Psychopath, which is Amazon's #1 New Release in the “Medical Mental Illness” category, offers an original and ground-breaking perspective on the terror war. Like no other work, it unveils the world of psychopathy and reveals, step by step, how Islamic Supremacists are duplicating the sinister methodology of psychopaths who routinely charm, seduce, capture, and devour their prey.
Jihadist Psychopath unveils how every element of the formula by which the psychopath subjugates his victim is used by the Islamic Supremacist to ensnare and subjugate non-Muslims. And in the same way that the victim of the psychopath is complicit in his own destruction, so too Western civilization is now embracing and enabling its own conquest and consumption.
As Jamie discusses in his video, John Bolton says about Jihadist Psychopath:
Hard as it is to believe, many in the West simply will not take the time and trouble to understand the threat posed by radical Islamicist terrorism. James Burnham once wrote of a similar problem with international Communism in his masterful Suicide of the West. Now, Jamie Glazov has written this century's counterpart to Burnham's classic work and will doubtless upset those determined not to analyze for themselves the nature of the underlying phenomenon.
With a Foreword written by Michael Ledeen, advance praise also comes from Dennis Prager, Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson and many other titans and scholars in the international arena. (See Amazon page for many of the blurbs).
Dennis Prager affirms that Jihadist Psychopath is "...one of the most important books of the present time."
And that's why you have to Order Jihadist Psychopath Today!
No comments:
Post a Comment