Justin Trudeau’s Canada Embraces a World Without Borders
The Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is set to sign the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration at an intergovernmental meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on December 10, 2018.
Few Canadians are aware of what this UN Global Compact represents; even fewer have been consulted, and without any mandate except for a parliamentary majority, Justin Trudeau is committed in signing Canada into an agreement with far-reaching conseque
nces -- not only for Canadians. Canada agreeing to abide by the agreement will also have consequences for Americans, as among migrants entering Canada might well be those intending to sneak into the United States across the world’s longest open border.
nces -- not only for Canadians. Canada agreeing to abide by the agreement will also have consequences for Americans, as among migrants entering Canada might well be those intending to sneak into the United States across the world’s longest open border.
The UN Global Compact spells out, in 34 pages of fine print, requirements for member-states to adopt as policy accommodating unfettered mass migration from the global South to the North.
Human migration is as old as human history. But in modern times, especially in the period following the end of the Second World War, resulting in massive dislocation of the European population, settlement of migrants was arranged and conducted by national governments with support of their citizens. The Global Compact, instead, is a UN top-down arrangement to deal with the migration problem turned into the most disruptive global crisis in recent years. This time, the crisis is the result of the massive failure of UN-engineered policies of socio-economic development of post-colonial societies in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America.
What we have witnessed since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the end of the Cold War in 1992, is a spike in wars, genocide, failed states, and terrorism. These have cumulatively resulted in mass migration as an escape from the collective failure of people in those countries to build and administer an orderly society, despite trillions of aid dollars provided by countries of the North, directly or through the UN agencies.
And despite this record of the failure of UN-driven development policies, the UN remains insistent on demanding more of the same in its 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Global Compact is a critical part of this agenda, based on the notion that “Migration contributes to positive development outcomes.”
There is little or no evidence of migration from the global South providing for positive development in the developing countries of that global South. Instead, the Global Compact turns migration into a human rights issue and confers “rights” on migrants that are the same as those of the citizens of the host countries, “rights” those governments are obliged to “respect, protect and fulfil.”
Any relationship at a minimum has two parties involved. The Global Compact claims for itself “a 360-degree vision of international migration…to optimize benefits of migration.” But it focuses entirely on the needs and rights of one party, the migrants, without taking into account the rights of the people of host countries, given the mounting evidence of how costly, unsettling and disruptive the “invasion” of migrants from the global South to the North has been.
The so-called Arab Spring of 2011, heralding demands for democracy and overthrow of repressive authoritarian governments, very rapidly turned into Arab nightmare. Civil wars in Libya and Syria, with poorly planned interventions by the UN, became uncontainable and spread anarchy. As central authorities collapsed, internal movements of people turned into a mass migration from the Middle East and North Africa, and joined by people from Central Asia and sub-Saharan Africa as economic migrants, headed for Europe.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s invitation in 2015 to Syrian migrants was a detonator of what has now become the migration crisis from the global South to Europe and North America.
The current wave of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa might only be the harbinger of an approaching tide gathering force to head north in the near future. It is expected that the African population will double to 2.5 billion by 2050. Africa will remain the poorest continent, and this doubling of population will make it the most crowded continent with a military age cohort of young men ready to march. The trajectory of African migration can only be in one direction: due north.
The answer to this ballooning migration crisis came from Angela Merkel in Berlin in the week when the world marked the 100th anniversary of the end of World War One. In speaking to an audience of German parliamentarians and foreign guests, Merkel said, “In this day nation-states must today – should today, I say – be ready to give up sovereignty.”
And to whom, we may ask?
Since nation-states are obsolete in Merkel’s view, they should fold up and make way for a world without borders administered by multinational organizations under the authority of the UN. But, ironically, Merkel’s advice is primarily directed to the long-standing old and stable nation-states of Europe and North America, and not to the newly established post-colonial states of the global South, such as China, India or South Africa.
The Global Compact that Justin Trudeau has already committed to sign is one among the many agreements the UN has been pushing in the making of a borderless world, including also the Paris Agreement for climate change and R2P or “Responsibility to Protect.”
The UN needs advanced democracies of the North to become signatories and help finance UN-prepared agreements and treaties as international laws, regardless of the customs and legal traditions of these long existing independent sovereign nation-states.
There are, however, a number of developed countries – Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Poland, Slovakia, the United States – that have indicated they will not sign the Global Compact in Morocco.
The Global Compact is also Shariah-compliant, since the 57-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the largest bloc of member-states in the UN. And OIC partnership with the EU in the UN makes for a formidable Red-Green alliance in European and North American politics of the traditional Left joining hands with the Shariah-promoting Islamic organizations, such as the Muslim Brotherhood.
In accordance with the OIC demand at the UN, the European Human Rights Court has ruled any criticism or insult of Islam and its prophet is not protected free speech, and it might be penalized under “hate speech” provisions of criminal codes.
Similarly, Justin Trudeau’s Liberal parliamentary majority in 2017 adopted motion M-103, which condemns any critical discussion of Islam and Muslims as “Islamophobia,” and under the “hate speech” provision of the human rights commissions in Canada might be subject to prosecution.
Moreover, the Global Compact requires, in terms of UN-speak a controlled media that abides by the UN norms and censors any critical discussion of UN policies relating to migrants as not “ethical.”
The recently announced hand-out of $600 million to the Canadian media over 5 years by Justin Trudeau is in keeping with with the Global Compact’s requirement for a docile media trained in UN-speak to enable the making of a UN-envisioned borderless global order.
Justin Trudeau’s readiness to sign the Global Compact comes as no surprise, since in his publicly stated view, Canada is a post-nationalist state with no core identity. Hence, in Trudeau’s version of Canada, there is no tradition to revere, no sacred values to defend, and no identity or history worth preserving.
Justin Trudeau is the poster face of the UN-envisioned borderless world. And into this UN-designed global order for the 21st century Trudeau-led “Canada without borders” is headed.
Graphoc credit: United Nations
Salim Mansur teaches at Western University, London, Canada and is the author of The Qur’an Problem and Islamism (2017).
THE BILLIONAIRES’S GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER
OPEN BORDERS
the true cost of all that “cheap” labor is passed
along to the middle class.
"This doesn't include the costs
of illegal immigration to society, which provides health care, housing, education, child
care, and legal services to illegal aliens. Even though immigration
advocates claim that illegal aliens do indeed pay taxes, the dollar
amount pales
in comparison to
the cost of the many services they receive."
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-globalist-democrat-party-for-wider_29.html
Meanwhile, despite the
highest taxes in the nation, California is $1.3 trillion in debt – unemployment
is at a staggering 11%. California's wacko giveaways to illegals
include in-state tuition, amounting to $25 million of financial aid. Nearly
a million illegals have California driver's licenses. L.A. County has 144% more registered voters
than there are residents of legal voting age. Clearly, illegals
are illegally voting.
THE (REALITY) OF THE GLOBALIST
DEMOCRAT PARTY AS IT SERVES THE RICH:
Anti-Semitic, open borders for
cheaper labor and funded by criminal banksters… and these pols are making vast
fortunes sucking the blood of America!
We must not let them cheat their
way to power over the rest of us. Their ongoing vote fraud must be
stopped and the Democrats need to take a look at themselves and at what they
have become. It's not a pretty picture. What they have become
threatens to destroy the greatest nation on the planet and they are doing it on
purpose. They have nothing but contempt for the US as founded and
for those of us who love this country. PATRICIA McCARTHY – AMERICAN THINKER
“Then we suffered the rattling election of
Barack Obama, whose active membership in a white-, Jewish-, and America-hating
church was well known to the electorate. His close personal
relationship with the likes of his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan
was no secret. Obama was open about his goals. He told us
he was out to "fundamentally transform America" and the world.” ALAN BERGSTEIN
“There is a deep racist and anti-Semitic disease in the leadership of
the Democrats. As Senator Cory Booker brings his hatred for the Jewish State to
the Senate, he should be asked whether he agrees with his hero, “The only good
Zionist is a dead Zionist we must take a lesson from Hitler”. DANIEL GREENFIELD
“The radicals seek nothing less than
secession from the United States whether to form their own sovereign state or
to reunify with Mexico. Those who desire reunification with Mexico are
irredentists who seek to reclaim Mexico's "lost" territories in the
American Southwest.” Maria Hsia Chang
Professor of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno
THE OBAMA – CLINTON – GLOBALIST CONSPIRACY:
Finish off the middle-class and build a “cheap” labor Mex servant class.
“Our
entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become
a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This
is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen
McQuillan THEAMERICAN THINKER.com
THE BILLIONAIRE
CLASS WAGES WAR ON AMERICA!
"GOP estb. is
using the $5 billion border-wall fight to hide up to four blue/white-
collar cheap-labor
programs in lame-duck DHS budget. Donors are worried that
salaries are too
damn high, & estb. media does not want to know."
TOP EVIL CORPORATIONS LOOTING
AMERICA
Goldman Sachs TRUMP CRONIES – CLINTON CRONIES
JPMorgan Chase OBAMA CRONIES
ExxonMobil
Halliburton BUSH
CRIME FAMILY CRONIES
British American Tobacco
Dow Chemical
DuPont
Bayer
Microsoft
Google CLINTON CRONIES
Facebook OBAMA CRONIES
Amazon
Walmart
GET THIS BOOK!
Obamanomics:
How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends,
Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special
interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting
handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small
businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter
Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White
House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering
corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate
America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s OBAMANOMICS TO
SERVE THE RICH AND GLOBALIST BILLIONAIRES.
BARACK OBAMA
GLOBALIST FOR BANKSTERS AND THE SUPER RICH and
OPEN BORDERS TO FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/barack-obama-and-his-muslim-style.html
“Democrats Move Towards ‘Oligarchical
Socialism,’ Says Forecaster Joel Kotkin.”
FAKEBOOK and GOOGLE ASSAULT FREE SPEECH TO BUILD THE
GLOBALISTS’ BILLIONAIRES’ DICTATORSHIP FOR THE RICH
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/facebook-and-google-assault-free-speech.html
THE INVITED INVADING
HORDES: IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED!
"In the decade
following the financial crisis of 2007-2008, the capitalist class has delivered
powerful blows to the social position of the working class. As a result, the
working class in the US, the world’s “richest country,” faces levels of
economic hardship not seen since the 1930s."
"Inequality has
reached unprecedented levels: the wealth of America’s three richest people
now equals the net worth of the poorest half of the US population."
MACRON ENCOUNTERS THE WRATH OF THE
FRENCH PEOPLE
Backlash protests against Macron’s globalist policies.
December
5, 2018
French President Emmanuel
Macron is learning the perils of defying the will of his own people to serve a
globalist agenda. The French president has made it his mission to lead the
globalist assault on fossil fuels to stem further increases in man-made
greenhouse emissions. He vowed to “make our planet great again,” after sharply
criticizing President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the
Paris Agreement on Climate Change. After convening the first One Planet Summit
in Paris in late 2017 and continuing to lecture the world about the need for
drastic actions to combat climate change, President Macron showed he was willing
to use his own people as sacrificial lambs. He proposed steep fuel-tax
increases to take effect this January, with more to come in subsequent years.
The purpose was to raise the price of carbon use in France. The French people
rose up in protest at a level not seen since the 1960’s. The yellow vest became
the symbol of what began as protests by French drivers against higher diesel
fuel prices. The protests, at times accompanied by violence, expanded to vent
the grievances of ordinary people feeling squeezed by President Macron’s
economic agenda. At first, President Macron would not budge. However, as the
street protests in Paris and other parts of France showed no signs of abating,
the Macron administration decided Tuesday to suspend the planned fuel tax increases for at least 6
months. France’s Prime Minister Edouard Philippe, not the aloof
President Macron, announced the suspension decision. “No tax is worth
jeopardizing the unity of the nation,” Prime Minister Philippe said in
explaining the government’s decision.
President Trump had acted
on the belief that the Paris Agreement on Climate Change represented a windfall
to many other countries to the detriment of American workers. President Macron,
on the other hand, remained oblivious to the economic plight of his own people,
who have been plagued by an overall jobless rate of 8.9%. The unemployment rate
for French youth (ages 15–24) has been reported to be as high 24.6 percent.
It is worth noting that
Prime Minister Philippe, not President Macron, used the phrase “the unity of
the nation” in announcing the suspension decision. That’s likely because Mr.
Macron sees himself more as a global citizen than as a citizen of the country
he was elected to lead. Unity of the world to address climate change is more
important to him than preserving the unity of the French nation by focusing
primarily on the economic needs of the French people.
The French president
showed his disdain for nationalism in remarks he delivered during a gathering
in Paris of world leaders, including President Trump, to observe 100 years
since the end of World War I. In a line that only a globalist could mouth,
President Macron exclaimed, “Patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism.
Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism.” Mr. Macron thought he was being
clever with his veiled attack on President Trump’s “America First” policies. However,
President Trump is having the last laugh. President Trump’s approval rating stands at approximately 46
percent currently. President Macron's approval rating has fallen to 23 percent. The French people, who
are suffering under President Macron’s globalist stewardship, presumably prefer
a “France First” president.
Mr. Macron repeats the
same globalist tripe that we heard for eight years from former President Barack
Obama and one that we hear all the time at the United Nations. It is based on the
false premise of multilateralism for its own sake. Globalists make the red
herring argument that the only alternative to multilateralism as they define it
is what Mr. Macron in his speech to the UN General Assembly last
September described as a unilateralist “survival-of-the-fittest
approach.” The real choice, however, is between manic multilateralism that
globalists believe in, versus rational multilateralism that respects national
sovereignty.
Manic multilateralism is
an uncritical deference to global norms and consensus, irrespective of the
consequences. The late Charles Krauthammer described its
ultimate purpose: to “reduce American freedom of action by making it
subservient to, dependent on, constricted by the will–and interests–of other
nations. To tie down Gulliver with a thousand strings… the slavish pursuit of
‘international legitimacy’ – and opposition to any American action undertaken
without universal foreign blessing.”
Rational multilateralism,
on the other hand, strives for cooperation among sovereign nations to address
issues of common concern. It seeks to promote possible practical solutions to
manageable problems transcending national boundaries that are fair to all
concerned. The United States remains among the most dedicated multilateralist
countries in the world. Americans generally support international cooperation
when effective in fighting a common threat such as global terrorism. The United
States has contributed more than any other member state to the United Nations
(including its specialized agencies and peacekeeping operations) to keep it in
business. We work through NATO in Europe, the Organization of American States
in Latin America, and U.S. alliances with Asian countries. We actively support
the work of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and legions of
multilateral relief agencies. None of that has fundamentally changed under
President Trump. What has changed, however, is that President Trump will not
tolerate funding arrangements that unfairly burden American taxpayers. He also
refuses to go along with UN-endorsed agreements not ratified by the U.S. Senate
that he deems to be contrary to the best interests and security of the American
people. As President Trump explained in his speech to the UN General Assembly on September 25, 2018, “America will always
choose independence and cooperation over global governance, control, and
domination.”
Globalists reject the
primacy of national sovereignty. They believe, for example, that by reflecting
some sort of international “consensus” in resolutions and other
"official" documents the United Nations has conferred special moral,
political and even legal legitimacy on the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris
Agreement on Climate Change. They argue that the Trump administration cannot disavow
these agreements without threatening to destroy the whole so-called
“rules-based international order.” Nonsense. President Trump saw
through the fundamental flaws in both agreements, neither of which are legally
binding treaties ratified by the U.S. Senate. He properly decided to act in the
interests of the people who elected him.
The Iran nuclear deal
provided a cash windfall to the dictatorial Iranian regime, which its leaders
are using to fund their ballistic missile program and to fund terrorism.
Obama’s deal kicked the Iran nuclear can down the road by not stopping
altogether the regime’s ability to develop nuclear weapons and the capability
to deliver them. The Paris climate agreement allowed China, the largest emitter
of greenhouse gasses, to do virtually nothing of consequence to reverse the
growth of its emissions until 2030. At the same time, Obama pledged further
rapid cuts in U.S. emissions with job-destroying new regulations. He also
agreed to a redistributionist funding scheme that would have picked American
taxpayers’ pockets to the tune of billions of dollars a year starting in 2020.
The fact that other nations’ leaders are either too stupid to heed President
Trump’s warnings, or have too much a stake in selfishly reaping economic gains
for their own countries, does not mean that President Trump must accede to
their wishes.
President Trump by word
and deed has laid out a vision that lauds international cooperation where
warranted but under which he “will never surrender America’s sovereignty to an
unelected, unaccountable, global bureaucracy.” President Macron, in
his own speech to the UN General Assembly last September, claimed that he does
not believe “in one great globalized people.” He believes deeply, he said, “in
the sovereignty of peoples.” Note that he uses the expression “sovereignty of
peoples” rather than “national sovereignty.” He said in the same speech that
“in no way will I yield the principle of the sovereignty of peoples to
nationalists.” The French people rioting in the streets of France against
President Macron’s proposed globalist fuel tax increases want a more
nationalist president who shows true concern for their well-being as French
nationals. Mr. Macron should start taking a lesson from Mr. Trump’s playbook if
he wants to remain president of the sovereign French nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment