Wednesday, January 16, 2019

DOUG PETRIKAT - REVOLUTION IN FRANCE AND THE MUSLIM INVASION OF PARIS

GLOBALISM: IT'S ALL ABOUT OPEN BORDERS FOR "CHEAP" LABOR AND THEN PASS ALONG THE TRUE COST TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS!



Macron and the Fall of France



It had been over twenty years since I had been in Paris when I visited again in July of 2018.  The contrast between my memory of the city and the current reality was astonishing.  Instead of resembling a European center of culture, fine food, and fashion, it seemed as if I were in a third-world country in North Africa.  It could have passed for a former French colony, since I did see some French signs, but not that many French people.  Many buildings and the subway system were in a state of decay, sanitation was poor, and homelessness seemed to be rampant.
Some French people I did see were the occasional groups of four or five armed soldiers on patrol.  When I was in the Louvre Museum, after going through a security check that you might expect at a major airport, an unaccompanied backpack was spotted on the floor in a large open area against a wall.  A few soldiers along with a man in civilian clothing walked over to the backpack and talked with concerned looks on their faces.  I was watching from about 20 or 30 feet away.  The man in civilian clothes walked over to me and asked me if it was mine.  Right after I told him that it wasn't, another man walked over and claimed it without incident.
The demographic and cultural transformation of France has been one of the main issues of concern for the yellow vest protesters who started demonstrating in November over a gas tax hike in the most heavily taxed nation in Europe.  They have been supported by 80% of the French people.  While 80% also believe that immigration should be stopped or much more strongly controlled, President Emmanuel Macron has chosen to ignore the views of the people he was elected to represent and has turned out to be one of Europe's strongest proponents of mass migration from the Third World.  The increase in violent crime and terrorism and the huge public expense incurred in providing state benefits to migrants does not seem to be of any great concern to him.
In an interview conducted in April 2018, Macron stated that due to explosive third-world population growth, Europe will be entering an age of unprecedented mass migration from Africa and that the people of the two continents have a shared destiny.  He was referring to an estimate that within the next few decades, the number of Africans living in Europe will increase from nine million to as many as 200 million. 
The continent of Africa is larger than the U.S., China, Japan, India, and most of Europe combined and is rich in valuable natural resources.  A more rational leader might have mentioned that, along with how the people should stay home and work on improving their own nations.  After the mass migration mess of the last few years, which flooded Europe with approximately 3 million mostly male economic migrants from third-world countries in the Middle East and Africa, resources are being stretched to the limit as Europeans deal with more violent crime and terrorism.  An additional 200 million could make that look like a relaxing Sunday afternoon picnic in the park.
And last month, Macron sent a representative to Marrakesh, Morocco to sign the U.N. Migration Pact, which aims to facilitate the regular movement of people from the Third World to developed countries.  He did this over the objections of the yellow vest protesters as well as a group of retired generals who stated in a published letter that signing the pact would be treasonous
While most U.N. members did sign the pact, a number of nations also objected and did not sign, including the U.S., Japan, Austria, Hungary, Poland, Italy, the Czech Republic, Israel, Chile, and Australia.  The migration issue has also caused serious strains among nations of the E.U. as pro-migration Macron and German chancellor Angela Merkel, who share similar views, have been at odds with counterparts such as Hungarian leader Victor Orbán and Italian deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini, who have stressed the importance of protecting Europe's borders.
On November 11, 2018 in Paris at a ceremony commemorating the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I, Macron gave a speech in which he criticized nationalism, calling it the opposite of patriotism.  This was obviously meant for some of the world leaders in attendance who have expressed nationalist views.  It was implied that nationalism caused the war and that its resurgence will result in new conflicts.  However, this claim is a misleading attempt to further a globalist agenda.
The political philosopher Yoram Hazony has convincingly argued that the assertion that nationalism caused the two world wars is simplistic.  The anti-nationalist rhetoric is in reality part of an ideological conflict over the political organization of the world.  Nationalism calls for the world to be organized around sovereign nation-states that each take into account the unique characteristics, culture, and needs of their people while respecting the sovereignty of other nation-states.  Globalists oppose nationalism because they believe that nation-states should be subject to laws imposed by international organizations, gradually giving up their rights as sovereign nations, and ultimately wither away to fall under one-world government.  Each side in this ideological conflict believes that following its own views will result in more stability, peace, and prosperity.
Macron once said that there is no such thing as French culture.  It was ridiculous to say such a thing, but culture is part of national identity.  To flood your nation with millions of economic migrants from the Third World is certainly a way to alter culture and national identity. 
I don't believe that Macron is a stupid man.  He must occasionally look out a window and see what is happening in Paris.  Maybe he believes that accepting millions of migrants in Europe will help bring the world closer to a globalist utopia, and that the people who will suffer the consequences before we get there are just collateral damage.  However, the yellow vest protests continue all over France, with over 80,000 participating last Saturday, and Macron's approval rating has hit as low as 18%
Macron's days as president of France may be numbered, but the direction France will then go remains to be seen.  I hope Macron's globalist dream will not become Europe's nightmare.
Photo credit: Pelle De Brabander.

ISLAM: THE SCOURGE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

A radical Muslim wants to cut your head off. A peaceful Muslim is praying that a radical Muslim cuts your head off.


Why are we defended the borders of these Muslim dictators when we can’t defend our own borders against NARCOMEX?
“The Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where young boys are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI

Robert Spencer’s The History of Jihad: From Muhammad to ISIS is an amazing book, extraordinary in its detail and riveting in its narratives and analysis.  This book documents the history of horrors, violence, brutality, oppression, conquests by the sword, beheadings of hundreds of thousands (probably millions), destruction of civilizations and cultures, corruption, deception, and lies that are part of the Islamist culture, and every other evil that you can imagine that one group of humans could impose on others in the name of an ideology or, in this case, a pseudo-religion.  


Yellow Vest Popularity in France Surges as Protests Find New Momentum



A 'yellow vest' (gilet jaune) protestor holds a banner reading 'Macron in jail' during an anti-government demonstration in downtown Lille, northern France, on January 5, 2019. - The 'yellow vest' movement began in rural France over fuel taxes and quickly ballooned into a wider revolt against the 41-year-old president's pro-business …
PHILIPPE HUGUEN/AFP/Getty Images)
 157
2:14




Support for the Gilets Jaunes (Yellow Vests) waned somewhat over the Christmas period but has found newfound momentum as a poll shows nearly 70 percent of French people now back it.

The results, released by polling firm Elabe, show a rebound in support for the movement, from 60 percent to 67 percent, following another nation-wide protest over the weekend, compared to 13 percent moderately opposed to the movement and 12 percent overtly hostile to it.


When broken down by political affiliation, the largest backers of the Yellow Vests remain the supporters of the populist parties on both the right and the left.
81 percent of supporters of Marine Le Pen’s National Rally said they were behind the movement and 88 percent of the supporters of the far-left Unsubmissive France party, led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon, backed the Yellow Vests. 54 percent of French added that they wanted the weekly protests to continue.
The so-called “Grand Debate” spearheaded by French president Emmanuel Macron has not been nearly as popular with the French public, according to the poll, with only 40 percent saying they will even participate in it, and 40 percent believing the Macron government most likely will not listen to the suggestions.
Seven in ten French people said they do not think the “Grand Debate” will change the style or method of Macron’s governing in any way.
Macron’s “Grand Debate” comes after the Yellow Vests demanded the government approve of the Citizen Initiated Referendum (RIC) proposal that would allow citizens to pass and repeal laws, remove officials from elected office, and even amend the French constitution through popular referendums, which was backed by 80 percent of French people, according to one poll.
Last Saturday’s “Act IX” protest saw around 32,000 participants and 100 arrests. The Yellow Vest movement has seen more arrests than any French social movement in recent history, with over 4,500 arrests since the movement began in November.


Follow Chris Tomlinson on Twitter at @TomlinsonCJ or email at ctomlinson(at)breitbart.com




Why Democrats Oppose The Wall: Trump Will Actually Build It




The conservative consensus is that Democrats don't want to fund President Trump's  wall because they hate him.  Well, yes, Democrats do indeed hate President Trump, and yes, it's a deep-seated hatred, a visceral, soul-rotting hatred, but that's not the real reason they won't fund the wall. 
The biggest reason Democrats won't even partially fund the wall is their absolute certainty that given the money, the president will actually build the thing. 
President Trump's  not some out-of-the-loop politician who can be outmaneuvered by a Deep State whose embedded bureaucrats will tell him everything's going swimmingly while they sabotage the project with cost overruns and endless delays.  No, the president will know how much it should and will cost, how long it should and will take, and how to overcome government roadblocks.  This is his wheelhouse.  He's done it his whole adult life.
And, since the wall is his signature issue, his personal passion, President Trump's going to be all over the construction.  That looming steel show-stopper will be blocking invaders in record time, under budget and ahead of schedule. 
Knowing that the wall will become a reality if the President gets the cash brings out the cheap-labor-express, wealthy power brokers like the Billionaires for Open Borders: Michael Bloomberg; Rupert Murdoch; other distinguished members of the Forbes 500; and, as Lou Dobbs often reminds us, the "globalists, the Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, Koch brothers and Wall Street." 
But it's not just the Washington insiders who like cheap renewable labor.  Retailgiants like Target, Walmart, and others reap the benefits of illegal immigration.  In fact, most industries get in on the deal.
A 2012 study shows a breakdown of unauthorized alien workers:
  • 22% in legal services, advertising, employment services, landscaping and waste management, dry cleaning, nail salons, car washes and religious organizations.
  • 18% in the leisure and hospitality sector, lodging, food services, theme parks, transportation, and other tourism oriented products and services
  • 16% in the construction industry 
  • 12% wholesale and retail trade
So most of the corporate world has some interest in stopping a border wall.  It's a top priority for many.  These interests make for a powerful force, and they will not back down.
The second reason Democrats will never fund the wall is their voter base – not unions or teachers, but illegal aliens, who broke our laws, crashed our border, and now infringe on American's sacred right to elect their government by illegally casting votes. 
One glaring example was the 2016 presidential election, where Hillary Clinton "garnered more than 800,000 votes from non-citizens."  How many of those illegal votes decided congressional or state races? 
Democrats continue to find creative ways for illegals to vote.  There's ballot-harvesting, where a third party collects ballots from voters then drops them off at polling places.  Once on the rolls, political campaigns have free license to go find that person, or even if they don't find him, just turn in a ballot in his name.
Then there's the Motor-Voter debacle: a million illegal aliens in California have Driver's Licenses.  California admitted that over 1,500 people were illegallyregistered under new automatic voter registration. 
California's not an anomaly.  Twelve states and the District of Columbia have now enacted laws to allow illegal aliens to obtain a driver's license – the gold standard for identification. 
So there's cheap labor and a growing Democrat base, but those issues were there when Democrats voted for previous "barriers," so what's the real problem? 
The deal-breaker is a missing out clause.  As I said, construction is President Trump's wheelhouse, so the wall will go up quickly.  No time to pull the legislation back or rewrite it, as they did with President Bush.
Bush signed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 into law after it was passed by huge bipartisan majorities in the House and Senate.  The law ordered the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to construct 700 miles of fencing along the southern border and authorized the addition of lights, cameras, and sensors to enhance security.  The law explicitly required the wall to be constructed of "at least two layers of reinforced fencing."
When Democrats took control of Congress a few months later, an amendmentwas added to the 2008 spending bill that gutted the law.  So Democrats and open-border Republicans were able to avoid a politically unpopular vote against the wall, then quietly gut its construction.  President Trump will not allow that recourse.
Herein lies the real threat to the open-border gang: that the wall a will be built and is a permanent fixture, not a fence drug dealers can build a ramp to roll over and deliver their poisonous drugs.  It is not a fence easily scaled or easily dismantled by future Democrat presidents.
No, the Trump wall will be steel, will be permanent.  If a Democrat is elected POTUS at a future date, he will not be able to simply undo the wall and reopen the border.  That's the non-negotiable piece: the fact that a steel wall is irreversible.  No escape clause. 
Is the Trump wall impenetrable?  No, even a steel wall can be breached.   A Department of Homeland Security test of a steel slat prototype proved that it could be cut through with a saw, a "common tool".
DHS Spokeswoman Katie Waldman responded:
The steel bollard design is internally reinforced with materials that require time and multiple industrial tools to breach, thereby providing U.S. Border Patrol agents additional response time to affect a successful law enforcement resolution.  In the event that one of the steel bollards becomes damaged, it is quick and cost-effective to repair.
Rush Limbaugh said the conventional wisdom is that the president will declare a national emergency to build the wall, then reopen the government, making Schumer and Pelosi the winners on the government shutdown, the ones who held the line. 
I'm all in for the national emergency, but hopefully the President will then resume negotiations.  At that point, the wall will no longer be a sticking point, so surely Democrats will fund drones, 750 U.S. Border Patrol agents, 2,000 new officers for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), more judges and attorneys to reduce the 650,000 immigration case backlog;" and new technology along the southern border".
After all, Democrats advocate for many of these solutions instead of a wall, so why wouldn't they eagerly embrace these security measures once the wall's off the table?  Or is their position going to be no border security of any kind?
The standoff over the wall looks like a lose-lose, a Mexican standoff, but the president can be totally victorious in this battle.
In every battle there comes a time when both sides consider themselves beaten, then he who continues the attack wins. Ulysses S. Grant
Stay strong, Mr. President, the American people are with you.


GEORGE SOROS AND THE CLINTON GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR BANKSTERS AND WIDEOPEN BORDERS
*

NEW YORK — Demand Justice, an organization founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and associated with a “social welfare organization” financed by billionaire activist George Soros, is raising money for an eventual court fight against what the group describes as President Trump’s proposed “racist, unnecessary wall.”

*


*

“Obama would declare himself president for life with Soros really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”

*

“Hillary was always small potatoes, a placeholder as it were. Her health was always suspect. And do you think the plotters would have let a doofus like Tim Kaine take office in the event that Hillary became disabled?”

MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPATION and LOOTING OF AMERICA by INVITATION OF THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY
"Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed ranting AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. “America is now Mexico’s social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."

"The man likely to be the next president of Mexico just called for mass migration to the US" RICK MORAN

“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.” RICK MORAN


FACTS ON THE “REAL LATINO AMERICA” OF MEXICAN OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES:

This is another "fact" spun from the 2004 op-ed by Heather Mac Donald, whose article refers to a single Los Angeles gang and the conjecture of an unnamed federal prosecutor.


1.      "40% of all workers in L.A. County are working for cash and not paying taxes. . . . This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a green card." The Mexican tax-free economy in Los Angeles County is estimated to be in excess of $2 billion dollars a year.

2.     "95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens . . . "


3.     "75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens."

4.    "Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers." The County of Los Angeles hands Mexico’s anchor baby breeders more than a BILLION DOLLARS a year in welfare.


5.     "Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally." California has the largest and most expensive prison system in the country. Half the inmates are now Mexicans. Half the murders in California are by Mexican gangs.

6.    Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.


7. "The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border."

8. "Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal."
immigrants.

9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish.


MEXICO WILL ELECT HER!

https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/01/michelle-obama-ill-be-baracks-third.html

The main objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to get elected; it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her. There are people who govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and the Clintons are the latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral gains under Obama and the Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who still care about their party still support the very people who have brought it down.

“Of course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president for eight long years.   MATTHEW VADUM



 Editorial Reviews: Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?



Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. TIMOTHY P CARNEY


Trump Has the Democrats Cornered

No sooner had the Democrats taken back the majority in the House of Representatives than they proved their harshest critics correct – the party no longer concerns itself with the interests of the American people.  And by refusing to provide a dime for a physical barrier on our border, they did it in the starkest terms possible.
Led by far-left Nancy Pelosi, who held off a challenge to her leadership from the even farther left, the House Democrats promptly put themselves in the position of being seen taking the side of foreigners entering the country illegally over the security and economic prosperity of American citizens.  They reduced themselves to the absurd position that "walls don't work."
I'm not one who necessarily believes that President Trump is a master negotiator or is playing 3D chess.  But whether by design or because of pressure from his restive base, he now has the winning hand to build his wall and go on to re-election in 2020.
What's important now is that Trump plays his winning hand and resists the growing calls from the opposition media and cheap-labor Republicans to compromise with Nancy and Chuck.  Doing so would just throw them a lifeline.  Instead, Trump should use the power granted presidents by Congress, declare a national emergency, and begin construction of the wall.
Sure, the Democrats and open-border zealots will run to the thoroughly discredited 9th Circuit and get an activist Obama judge to stand the law on its head and issue a bogus restraining order.  But the president will be on solid legal footing, and that ruling will be overturned by the Supreme Court on the expedited basis that an emergency declaration demands.
It took a while for them to admit it, but even liberal legal scholars now grudgingly recognize that the National Emergencies Act of 1976 grants the president the authority to reprogram military construction funds for emergency projects.  And sorry, CNN, but it's the president and the president alone who decides what's an emergency.  The Secure Fence Act passed by Congress in 2006 further strengthens Trump's case for declaring an emergency.
This will put the Dems in the awkward position of arguing that wasteful Army Corps of Engineer projects in Iraq and Afghanistan are more important than one protecting America's border.  While many of those projects were of dubious value to begin with, many more have already been built, have been destroyed, and are waiting to be rebuilt to be destroyed again.
While all this plays out, the Democrats will be all over the opposition media, declaring Trump a tyrant for having the audacity to secure the nation's borders.  It will be Trump Derangement Syndrome on parade as one wild-eyed leftist after another vehemently argues against what Americans can plainly see is common sense.
Trump's greatest value is as a disruptor, and all this disruption is just too delicious, as it forces the Dems to play their losing hand.
While Trump should quickly end the partial government shutdown to take away that issue, he shouldn't give an inch on DACA or any other form of amnesty.  Doing that would muddy the waters and fracture his base and congressional Republicans.  That argument can wait for another day and for more substantial concessions from the Democrats like an end to chain migration.  In the meantime, let the Dems twist in the wind.
This would also be a good time for the administration to get its communications act together and correct several fallacies the opposition media have ingrained into the public's consciousness – fallacies like that the wall is an exorbitant expense, when in reality it will save far more through reduced costs associated with illegal immigration, which currently costs the nation well over $150B each and every year.  Heck, it will save money on the reduced need for border patrol personnel alone.  Then there is the fallacy that a 2,000-mile border barrier is some major engineering challenge, when the U.S. has built over 46,000 miles of interstate highways, each mile of which required more complex engineering than setting a steel-bollard wall.  And there is the self-obvious fallacy that agenda-driven politicians, open-borders advocates, and opposition media pundits know more about how to secure the border than border patrol agents who overwhelmingly are calling for a physical barrier.
Having regained one house of Congress, the Democrats immediately boxed themselves into a losing position.  That position is in opposition to the main issue that elected Trump to the presidency: securing the border.  Their fellow travelers in the media can deceive the uninformed portion of the electorate for only so long before it becomes painfully clear that voting for Democrats imperils the nation.
The author hosts Right Now with Jim Daws, a video webcast on news, politics, and culture from an American nationalist perspective.  http://twitter.com/RightNowJim Daws

For EVERY DACA handed amnesty, their entire extended family gets in!
THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY’S DACA DREAMERS HOAX TO DOULBE THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS AND DEPRESS WAGES EVEN MORE
*
THE DEM CONSPIRACY HITS SAN DIEGO
Let’s briefly review the sordid history of DACA. DACA was a program concocted by the Obama administration to overcome the failure of Congress to pass a massive amnesty program known as Comprehensive Immigration Reform and the follow-up attempt to pass a massive amnesty program known as “The DREAM Act.” By Michael Cutler
*
*

The concept behind the DREAM Act and DACA was to exploit the well-known empathy and compassion Americans have for children. Both of those efforts were sold as means of helping children who were brought to the United States by their parents. By Michael Cutler
*
study by Tom Wong of the University of California at San Diego discovered that more than 25 percent of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That totals about 200,000 anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens. This does not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified illegal aliens. JOHN BINDER

THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY TO SERVE THE RICH, BANKSTERS AND EXPAND THE MEX WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA TO KEEP THEM COMING

Greenspan, Schumer and their cohorts are determined to create a $15.00 per hour “standard wage” to be paid to all workers irrespective of education or the nature of their jobs.  This is called Communism! 
"They are willing to rend the fabric of this nation in order to protect their privilege and lifestyle.  While the vast majority of Americans will ultimately pay the price, the current ruling class and their progeny will have far more to lose." STEVE McCANN

ANN COULTER: WILL THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR BANKSTERS AND BILLIONAIRES DESTROY AMERICA?
I would also go to all of the working class that are in America, construction workers in particular. Their salaries have not just stagnated, they have gone down in the last 20 years. These are the least among us. We are the only ones not speaking out of self-interest. …
Most of the people who are advocating for open borders … they have a vested in interest in having either the cheap labor or the Democratic voters. Their neighborhoods aren’t the ones being overwhelmed. They get the cheap maids, the cheap nannies, and then they strut around like they’re Martin Luther King.
No, you are talking in your self-interest, Chamber of Commerce, and Koch brothers, and Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer. It’s Donald Trump and our side who are actually caring about our fellow Americans — the kids who are getting addicted to black tar heroin. …

The heroin problem in this country is 100 percent a problem of not having a wall on the border. And 70,000 Americans are dying every year. That’s more that died in the entire Vietnam War. That is a national emergency.  ANN COULTER

 

No comments: