CALIFORNIA and the RISE OF THE LA RAZA MEXICAN
FASCIST WELFARE STATE
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/08/they-invading-horde-waving-their.html
"The costs of illegal immigration are being carefully hidden by Democrats."
Accounting
for these differences reveals that California's
real poverty rate is 20.6 percent – the highest in America, and nearly twice the national
average of 12.7 percent.
"The
public schools indoctrinate their young charges to hate this country and
the rule of law. Illegal aliens continue overwhelming the state,
draining California’s already depleted public services while endangering
our lives, the rule of law, and public safety for all citizens."
MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPTION and LOOTING OF AMERICA by INVITATION OF THE
LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY
"Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that
Obrador has previously proposed ranting AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS.
“America is now Mexico’s social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the
Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."
"The man likely to be the next president of Mexico just called for mass migration to the US" RICK MORAN
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all
the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,”
Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in
the United States.” RICK MORAN
JAMES WALSH
THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA… first ease millions of illegals over our borders and into our voting
booths!
How the Democrat party
surrendered America to Mexico:
“The watchdogs
at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama
administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices
Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington
Times
"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the
Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN,
belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and
California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers
via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney
General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of
migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per
year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials
only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two
pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain.
“The cost
of the Dream Act is far bigger than the Democrats or their media allies admit.
Instead of covering 690,000 younger illegals now enrolled in former President
Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty, the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3
million illegals, according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy
Institute.”
We’ve got an even
more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or
the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of
Mexico….. AND THE ENEMY IS THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY!
WHO REALLY PAYS THE COST OF OPEN BORDERS?
More than
7-in-10 households headed by immigrants in the state of California are on
taxpayer-funded welfare, a new study reveals.
The
latest Census Bureau data analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS)
finds that about 72 percent of households headed by noncitizens and immigrants
use one or more forms of taxpayer-funded welfare programs in California — the
number one immigrant-receiving state in the U.S. JOHN BINDER
This week, lawmakers unveiled a $1 billion health care plan that would
include spending $250 million to extend health care coverage to all illegal
alien adults. JENNIFER G.
HICKEY
Two groups of
Central American migrants made separate marches on the U.S. Consulate in
Tijuana Tuesday, demanding that they be processed through the asylum system
more quickly and in greater numbers, that deportations be halted and that President Trump either let them
into the country or pay them $50,000 each to go home. MONICA SHOWALTER
This annual income for an impoverished American family
is $10,000 less than the more than $34,500 in federal funds which are spent on
each unaccompanied minor border crosser.
A study by Tom Wong of the
University of California at San Diego discovered that more than 25 percent of
DACA-enrolled illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That totals
about 200,000 anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled illegal
aliens. This does not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified illegal
aliens. JOHN BINDER
For EVERY DACA handed amnesty, their entire extended
family gets in!
THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY’S DACA DREAMERS HOAX TO
DOULBE THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS AND DEPRESS WAGES EVEN MORE
THE DEM CONSPIRACY HITS SAN DIEGO
Let’s briefly review the sordid history of DACA. DACA was a
program concocted by the Obama administration to overcome the failure of
Congress to pass a massive amnesty program known as Comprehensive Immigration
Reform and the follow-up attempt to pass a massive amnesty program known as
“The DREAM Act.” By Michael Cutler
The
concept behind the DREAM Act and DACA was to exploit the well-known empathy and
compassion Americans have for children. Both of those efforts were sold as
means of helping children who were brought to the United States by their
parents. By Michael Cutler
A study by Tom Wong of the University of California at San Diego
discovered that more than 25 percent of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens in the
program have anchor babies. That totals about 200,000 anchor babies who are the
children of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens. This does not include the anchor
babies of DACA-qualified illegal aliens. JOHN BINDER
DACA for a wall?
The Drudge Report features a rare editorial as one of its headers: a call from the Dallas Morning News for President Trump and Congress to swap legalization for DACA recipients for a border wall. It's something that on the surface sounds like a reasonable enough compromise.
The government shutdown is in its fourth week, with no end in sight because our leaders in Washington don't seem to want an end that doesn't amount to political humiliation of the opposition.But imagine for a moment that President Donald Trump and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer could see their way to a compromise that Americans would support and that would greatly benefit this country.To us, it would look like this: The president would get the funding he seeks to enhance border security, including some 230 miles of physical barrier, but also with more technologically sophisticated solutions.In return, the president would agree to a sweeping deal to protect young people who were brought to this country without authorization at ages when they had no say over what happened to them.
It's for sure a compromise, and it's likely that a compromise is going to be required to get the government reopened at all, given the intransigence of the Democrats over this piddly little request from Trump, very small in the scheme of federal funding.
President Trump is expected to give a major address on the shutdown today, so with Drudge running this editorial, one wonders if he knows that this might be what's ahead.
That said, such a swap is going to be a problem.
The wall halts incentives to migrate illegally. Rewarding DACA recipients is going to supercharge the incentive to migrate illegally, even if the compromise specifically says it won't include new migrants. It's an amnesty, and every amnesty brings in more migrants, all of them waiting for the next subway train to stop, because they know it will.
Now consider the impact of an amnesty with a wall. The wall won't completely cover the terrain, given the limits of geography, so the 230-mile or so stretch of it will merely drive migration out to the desert badlands. People will be incentivized to come with kids – in the hands of human-smuggling cartels – through the desert badlands instead of through the areas closer to urban centers with services. That sounds like a recipe for migrant child deaths. There likely will be, and lots of news coverage blaming the wall. None of the focus will be on the bad decisions of the migrants who are acting on the DACA incentive, that draw or pull that makes them want to undertake such a risky journey. If the journey looks risky now, imagine what it will look like with a wall up and the incentives to immigrate illegally still there.
All the same, a compromise means giving up something, so maybe the status quo will be preserved. The Dallas Morning News argues that DACA should be expanded, and all the people who were rejected for it due to their criminal records should be added in. (I don't think so – already DACA recipients are allowed at least two "free" misdemeanors to qualify, which pretty well signals a life of crime ahead.) Far better to allow kids who missed the cutoff for age by a few years than these budding thugs. Instead of expanding it by crime record, it would be better if DACA were narrowed, to strictly non-criminal applicants, with proof they haven't cast an illegal ballot to cancel out the vote of a U.S. citizen as well. There also should be no chain migration to reward the law-breaking parents, who really should be in the dock for child abuse as well as breaking immigration law, given that they've put their children into the hands of pirates on dirty, dangerous desert pathways. Perhaps a new law increasing penalties for such lawbreakers would be appropriate – anyone found bringing kids into illegal migration schemes can never become a citizen. Or perhaps all illegal migrants must provide the names and particulars of the cartel smugglers they paid in order to get any consideration for U.S. residency, whether by asylum or ordinary application. Helping to break up smuggling cartels, which profit so handsomely on the U.S.'s lax and easily manipulated immigration laws, might be a fair exchange for the interests of the U.S. citizens (and Mexican citizens, given the havoc the financially powerful cartels have wrought) if a wall is even to work.
There need to be some checks and balances so the incentive to migrate illegally becomes less attractive than the incentive to come legally. I'd be all in for asking DACA recipients to fly back to their home countries and apply legally, same as all other migrants. They could come back as they waited due to DACA provisions. That would make their immigration more of a normal thing, and we might even get some productive citizens out of it.
The incentive door remains open with a DACA-for-wall deal. If a wall is going to mean anything, that needs to be shut tight.
No comments:
Post a Comment